What will NOT be in the Constitution

Yes, we have already talked about and will write a lot about what will be in the package of amendments. It is a pity that sometimes a not very pleasant impression develops that not all writers and speakers understand what is at stake. Especially on TV, it is clearly striking. Someone is engaged, someone truly believes. To each, as they say, his own.

But now we will not talk about what WILL be, we will look at things that WILL NOT be in the Constitution. This, in my opinion, is more serious than the “perestroika” that awaits us.

Item number 1. The ability to influence power

At all? The Constitution is a document that in fact regulates how the people (electorate, voters, no matter what they call) can influence the government.

Yes, today we have this minimum opportunity, every six years an electoral show with a vote on the principle of “no one else”, well, the opportunity to snatch something from the locals rushing for deputies. Playground, porch repair and so on.

And then it will not be in principle. A bond is formed such as the president - the Federation Council - the State Duma - the government.

In general, Putin today has more than just broad powers. Apparently, there is never a lot of power, because most of the package of amendments is dedicated to ensuring that there is even more power.

Because it will be that no one can challenge Putin’s decisions, but he will appoint members of the government, the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, senators ... And no one can really do anything, if that. Even the State Duma. She is already tame and without the slightest opposition, but she will vote properly as it should, because if something goes wrong, she will simply be dissolved by Putin’s decree and new elections will be called.

Therefore, the State Duma is immediately excluded from the list of possible interference. And then, do we have a "random" person from the street can become a deputy? Can not.

Next we have the Federation Council. Consists of people who are sent by governors. Can a person from the street become a governor? Not. Even considering that governors are not appointed, but elected. Elections, elections ...

In addition, our native Constitution does not prescribe the procedure for registering political parties and the rules for holding elections. All this is determined by federal law. Everything would be fine, but who makes laws in our country? Yes, United Russia, to which Putin has nothing to do. Therefore, with the registration of ANY parties, we are now completely calm, and it is simply impossible to do this.

As a picture, I can bring my visit to the party of Zakhar Prilepin, which is “For Truth”. In my own city. Where a representative who came from Moscow proudly stated that they were ALLOWED to register because there were fears that many votes in the upcoming Duma elections would go to Navalny.

There is a situation in which the appearance of at least some opposition, in addition to that authorized by the authorities, does not and will not. As there will be no alternative presidents. As unnecessary. Elections on the principle of “but no one else” is a very convenient thing.

About the courts are literally two words. Courts (Supreme Court and Constitutional Court) cease to be independent and independent. Judges are appointed by Putin; judges are dismissed by Putin. That's all. A person, even if he is at least three times honest and independent, if he doesn’t take the decisions Putin needs, he will not stay in court for a long time.

Total: manual upper house of parliament (Sovfed), manual lower house (State Duma), fully controlled by the Supreme and Constitutional Courts. The government is also under the full control of the president. Everything is controlled by the president - from and to. Assigned, removed, dissolved, dismissed. Prime Ministers, Senators ...

By the way, ministers. Now they are of two categories. The first, important (power and economic ministers), are appointed directly by the president. Minor ones - the prime minister with the approval of the State Duma, but if there are plugs, then in the end they will be appointed by the president, bypassing the State Duma.

Do you see people here? And I do not see. But it is probably not especially necessary for the people. However, if I am mistaken, then we will see it after July 1.

Item number 2. About pensions and salaries

Pensions are mentioned in a very interesting context. Yes, probably, the fact that the Constitution says that pensions should be and should be indexed at least once a year is interesting. But no more than that, because there specifics - zero.

Indexation of pensions "in the manner prescribed by federal law" - this, of course, sounds. How much? When? How? If all this is already in the law, then why shove it into the Constitution?

Here it is worth a look to Europe. In many countries, social programs in general and pensions in particular are not announced in the Constitution. And the state does not guarantee anything constitutionally. But if you look at Germany, Austria, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, then there are no guarantees on paper. There is social programs and pensions. Just eat it. Yes, such that in some countries there is no end to those who wish to live there.

Salaries. Well, it's just a laugh. Salary should not be lower than the established living wage. And who sets the cost of living? Correctly mentioned above. Which this very minimum is left at one or two dinners in a restaurant. And then they are surprised how the people rushed for a ten thousandth allowance, well this is not money at all!

About experiments about living on a living wage, I don’t even want to talk. It is impossible to live in Russia for this “living wage”.

So these fad are about nothing.

Item number 3. Protecting History and Language

Again the items are about nothing. History rewrites the state by the ministry of culturelessness and the ministry of stupidity. However, I already spoke about this. Bees versus honey and so on.

Item number 4. State control over prices

That would be interesting to see. But who is robbing his own, right? No, electorate, this will not happen. We have a market. Capitalist. For details, go to Dudu, he will tell you how cool it is to live in a capry.

And we will observe an unprovoked increase in prices for the same fuel, and the subsequent increase in prices for everything else.

Example: in my city in May-June gas went up by 4 rubles. From 22.50 to 26.50. Diesel fuel - from 46.10 to 48.00. Why? And everything is simple. Money is needed for those who trade. What is the market economy, what is the dependence on world prices, what are you talking about? Demand fell on the people, they began to ride less - here, get it! Traders will get theirs anyway! At the expense of those who could not pinch.

What about masks? Yes, those same masks that are from the virus. There were 3,50 rubles a piece. And at the peak of steel at 100 rubles.

And what could / wanted our government to do? Never mind. Demonstrated complete impotence in this regard. Well, except for Sobyanin, who bought a mask for himself and ordered all Muscovites to wear masks.

The maximum that the president and the government are capable of in terms of prices is to issue statements on the theme that "we will not allow ... we will not allow ..." But these are words, words for which there is no deed. And the prices for fuels and lubricants are rising as if nothing had happened. And no one decree to them, nor world prices, nor Putin, nor the government.

And never such a thing as state guarantees for compliance with pricing policies will not appear anywhere. Especially in the Constitution. Because it can first of all oblige the government to work.

Although we have a lot of things written in the laws and what they don’t even look at. And nothing.

Item 5. On foreign assets

It's funny too. This means that officials and government officials cannot have a second passport and a bank account. Bad, ugly. But, in fact, it has long been spelled out in the relevant laws of the federal level. That's just not much to stop anyone. Because if you really want to or a good person ... As you know, any law in our country is easily handled in such circumstances.

But why the impossibility of owning property abroad was made to the accounts and passports in the Constitution? Sorry, a house in Spain - it can bring income no less than a contribution to Deutsche Bank or American Express.

But this is silent. It is impossible. It’s not good to offend your own. Therefore, Mr. Klishas (co-chair of the amendment commission) will still own real estate in Switzerland, United Russia deputy Vladislav Tretyak will be the owner in Latvia, his party and State Duma colleague Valery Gazzayev will be in Spain. Etc.

Item number 6. Ruble

Yes, we have repeatedly said that it would be nice to have a free, dollar-independent currency. It would be nice if the Russian Central Bank was commanded by a man who would be vilified in the UK in all corners, and not recognized as the best banker of the year. So that the ruble does not fall and does not hit historical lows, depending on the price of oil and the dollar.

We would love to live in a country with hard currency. But, alas, it is still liquid and gaseous with us and depends on how much oil and gas and at what price they will buy from us.

Although in gas station countries such as the UAE or Qatar, things are completely different ...

Item number 7. Medicine

I am very sorry that there will be no clause which says that the state guarantees the right to life and health at its own expense. What they have turned medicine into in general is not even a conversation for the Constitution, but for the Criminal Code, since it is a crime.

But no lesser crime is to doom Russian citizens to fooling for their children. For humiliated extortion of money from compassionate fellow citizens and, as a result, saving children not at the expense of the state, but at the expense of the electorate again.

I want to summarize. The main task of the Constitution is to ensure that power is controlled, that its institutions are accountable to each other and the people have the opportunity to ask and have the opportunity to influence.

When voters can convey their will and opinion to deputies, senators, ministers, as is the case in the USA, for example, when the government understands the need to hear popular opinion (not like it will be on July 1), then the government itself will protect the integrity of the territory, index retirement and keep a story.

And guarantee the Whiskas seals every day.

When this is not the case, at least put everything into the Constitution, but if the government has not done this before, it will continue to do its own thing.

Unfortunately, for some reason the electorate here does not understand this. I personally get the impression that many are in some kind of pink dreams, now we’ll accept the amendments - and the milk rivers will flow with the jelly banks. Wow, this will be spelled out in Our Constitution!

The fact that all this has long been in the laws, but it does not bother everyone, especially the performers, does not bother anyone. The main thing is to accept. And there the wheel of samsara will spin in the opposite direction and a new life will begin with us.

Yes, it will begin. But without the above. And all this tinsel with the institution of marriage, God and other things is about nothing.

All amendments to the Constitution can very easily be spread out not even into eight folders, as I said before, three are enough.

First: Putin must rule another 16 years. Minimum.

Second: Putin must possess not just the fullness of power, but the imperial level. Why would he do this? I have already said that it is not yet clear. But for some reason, yes, otherwise why all this booth?

The third. Any small things like gays, family, god, seals and other things. Carrying nothing, but serving to mask the first two.

It is clear that with such a level of statements that Putin has already made two weeks before the election that 60% of the population will come and 70% will vote “for”, so that the new text of the Constitution is already printed and is waiting for it to be delivered to the shops, - it is clear that everything will be so.

Someone like this prospect very much, I agree, we have a lot of monarchists. Someone doesn’t. The question of everyone's choice.

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas.

Comments

[iouris]

Personally, he "did not see". The market economy implies that the ability to work is sold at the market price. In other words, the capitalist buys the ability to work at the minimum price (this was discovered by K. Marx). If something doesn't suit you, find yourself another capitalist.

[Svarog]

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas.

Roman, you are just a sensible person .. Personally, I also did not see anything that would at least hint in the future could be reflected in positive transformations. At the same time, zeroing, strengthening of the sole authority, irresponsibility (or non-jurisdiction) is clearly visible .. in general sadness ..

[Nicholas C.]

Quote: Roman Skomorokhov

The state rewrites history using the ministries of culturelessness and the ministry of stupidity.

Of course, sovereignty is not interesting. We give back $ 50 billion. Hodor, $ 500bn. for a plane shot down by Sumerians, what else they say and how much they say - and then Roman will have a good life.
It became interesting about the lack of culture and stupidity. Whom did you define as a measure? Here is the Military Review site again! launched a series of articles at the same time about the wonderful king! Rus! (Orthodox!) Danilo Galitsky, simultaneously spitting on Alexander Nevsky. That, in general, there is no one who would know the history of that period, at least in the school volume, in order to see dill and Russophobia? Then you definitely need to be corrected.

[parusnik]

We give back $ 50 billion. Hodor, $ 500bn. for a plane shot down by Sumerians, what else they say and how much they say - and then Roman will have a good life.

... They gave 3 lard to Ukraine for gas, 1,5 lard to Poland, for gas, and you know, life has become better, life has become more fun, breathing more freely ... Don’t you?

[aerspb]

That’s why they gave 1.5 lard to Poland, because so far under the Constitution there is a primacy of international laws over domestic ones. So find yourself and rejoice

[2 Level Advisor]

And how will the prescribed primacy of our laws help if, as it was, the consulate in the USA is simply confiscated and that’s all? And other real estate and assets on account of debt .. How will the constitutional letter help to avoid this? Please tell me, but something is not clear ..

[aerspb]

Well, so we confiscate. Believe me, they have no less assets in our territory, and maybe even more than ours. I think that everyone understands and will not get to this. They may limit themselves to the temporary arrest of some of our sailboats (as it was already - Kruzenshteyn seems to have been arrested or something :), but then they still gave it away. Nobody needs financial war of this kind and don’t hope :)

[2 Level Advisor]

For some reason, Alexander, in 2017, they took our stripes away and didn’t give it back and say they won’t give it back .. But we still haven’t confiscated anything and are not going to ..

[aerspb]

Well, the time has not come. Sooner or later, "our potential partners" pay for all, in one way or another. Don't worry, nerve cells don't regenerate :)

[Revival]

The time has not come? Wimps are easy.
From July 02, will the time come or not again?

[ruivit1988]

Why did ours give a senior answer to the enemy, namely, they expressed terrible concern and, in fact, everything. Finally, admit the fact that our state is not as powerful as it was in the USSR, it’s just telling our brother in a box about the significance of Russia. Well, in fact, what strong countries will tell us is what we are doing.

[CSKA]

Quote: ruivit1988

Finally, recognize the fact that our state is not as powerful as it was in the USSR

Well, you somehow already understand that the USSR unfortunately does not exist. And he was not so powerful as you think.

Quote: ruivit1988

Well, in fact, what strong countries will tell us is what we are doing.

What are you? Right? That tells us the United States does not support Assad, but we support. They say give Crimea, but we do not give. Japan says the Kuril Islands give, but we do not give. In Europe they say LDNR do not support, but we support.

[Dmitry10SPb]

And the result? Stagnation in the economy. But the amendments are nothing new. Originality not found. Pure Qin Dynasty with the irreplaceable Cixi. The year is so 1910. On the eve of ....

[CSKA]

Quote: Dmitry10SPb

And the result? Stagnation in the economy.

))))) Interestingly you attracted foreign policy to the economy. As usual, the opposition threw in an interesting word and no one really understands it everywhere sculpts. And what kind of stagnation do we have? So let's look at 2018. The growth in the Russian Federation is 2,3%, in France 1,7%, in Germany 1,4%, in the UK 1,4%. Here we are in Russia, together with leading EU countries, sitting and stagnating.)))) Well, for you, it’s probably just a great example of Rwanda, there are 8,7%. Do you want yours? Here they do not stagnate.

Quote: Dmitry10SPb

But the amendments are nothing new.

You really don’t know what's new?

[ruivit1988]

That's why I love the numbers as such, their flexibility, for example, how to show a good result in the absence of such one. For example, if compared with the previous month, 50% more boots were made. In numbers it sounds in place of ten pairs; fifteen pairs of boots were made. Whether this is a good result, well, the next team makes several thousand pieces. You say well, and where does the economy and I will answer you here are other numbers. In 2019, our country had 1 trillion. 610,381 billion dollars, that is, 10970 went to each Russian; thousand dollars Take the same Germany and so Germany’s GDP for 19 3 trillion. 963.8 billion dollars. where every German earned $ 47670 Take the same France 2 trillion. 761.6 billion dollars, and each Frenchman earned $ 41176. Now, if you look like this at the economy of our country and these two. As a percentage of growth as it does not inspire. So the numbers are very flexible and they can show the situation as you like.

[CSKA]

Quote: ruivit1988

Now, if you look like this at the economy of our country and these two. As a percentage of growth as it does not inspire. So the numbers are very flexible and they can show the situation as you like.

What are you? First, why do you take the GDP (face value)? Although I myself will answer. It is very convenient for the opposition. But you want Russia to be lower in the list of world economies. Although any normal economist says that the level of the economy shows GDP (PPP). Secondly, who told you jokes about the fact that the standard of living shows GDP per capita?

[ruivit1988]

Secondly, who told you jokes about the fact that the standard of living shows GDP per capita?

I completely agree with you, but there is one thing. Here are some more interesting numbers. Germany has a salary of $ 31746,4, and a GDP of $ 47670,88, France a GDP of $ 41176,73 and a salary of $ 26000,3. Well, now Russia has a GDP of $ 10974 and a salary of $ 7411,8. You can certainly kill more than one week, NATO that would fit into the ears in the numbers of salaries and food prices. But then I think it will be where it looks depressing, and there will be no joy in the growth of GDP by three percent or even five percent.

[CSKA]

Quote: ruivit1988

Here are some more interesting numbers.

Well, let's figure it out. Firstly, it is already clear that there is no stagnation, what the initial conversation is about. We have the same "stagnation" as in Germany or France. Secondly. You have moved to the standard of living. Take the average Z.P. and compare it to GDP per capita. All this seems to be fine except for one thing, the difference in purchasing power and currency. Precisely because GDP per capita is measured in dollars, it is not an indicator of the standard of living. You can hardly live a month on the minimum wage in Germany, believe me. And in the Russian Federation you can easily live for 3 months.

Quote: ruivit1988

You can certainly kill more than one week, NATO that would fit into the ears in the numbers of salaries and food prices. But then I think it will be where it looks depressing, and there will be no joy in the growth of GDP by three percent or even five percent.

There will be nothing depressing. I know the prices in Germany very well and know how they live there. You have moved from GDP growth to living standards. We know very well that there are no dairy rivers and jelly banks anywhere. And just like the Germans work from morning to night, they buy cars on credit and apartments for mortgages, so do we. GDP per capita looks beautiful, but do you really think that everyone lives happily in Macau or Brunei? Everywhere its nuances. If I in Krasnodar would get average Z.P. then a third would be spent on an apartment, and in Germany, with their average, half would fly away in Berlin, and in Frankfurt even more. This is one example.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: aerspb

Well, the time has not come.

[BecmepH]

Quote: aerspb

Well, the time has not come. Sooner or later, "our potential partners" pay for all, in one way or another. Don't worry, nerve cells don't regenerate :)

We have already been burying Ukraine and the states for several years., And so far we have been paying (((Both to Ukraine and Am and Poland and to anybody ...

[aglet]

"Well, we also confiscate. Believe me, they have no less assets on our territory,"
Well, this is not our method, we cannot violate international treaties and cause harm to our partners. in short, scotskotno, at least where and where to write

[adler87]

And after that, back to the USSR since the 30s.

[Lynx-z]

you are mistaken ... we have fewer assets of these adversaries

Quote: aerspb

Well, so we confiscate. Believe me, they have no less assets in our territory, and maybe even more than ours. I think that everyone understands and will not get to this. They may limit themselves to the temporary arrest of some of our sailboats (as it was already - Kruzenshteyn seems to have been arrested or something :), but then they still gave it away. Nobody needs financial war of this kind and don’t hope :)

[atakan]

There are many assets and there are a lot of them, a lot of resource-mining was given into the wrong hands, that not a month, then articles in the newspaper, they say they again stole gold and were taken to London, but in real life these enterprises simply belong to these from London.
Recall nickel - platinum miners, at least, the United States has outlived what it wanted, it has been talked about a lot, but now everything is quiet, because whoever has taken the shares and places in management, and the Kremlin cannot speak against.
Unpromising).

[Lynx-z]

yes, only here it’s the opposite ... these are our assets in their hands ...

[zenion]

And what about the president’s wedding night? I read it from left to right and vice versa, then from the bottom to the top I tried to search through the mirror and did not find it, but it was written somewhere and will be executed. There was no such thing that the tsar did not have the right to the first wedding night, what kind of tsar is this if this netuti ?! But everything else is just written that way, for the closest. But the king had and will have subjects. If the people want power, then they must have the right to elect this power themselves. If the people do not want this, and the people will choose the power, then the people will have the very tomatoes, each with a seal in their hand, or with an admission for some amount of the right to cripple.

[parusnik]

That is, international treaties in connection with the amendments can not be concluded? And if you conclude, then be sure to prescribe, for example: Disputes arising in connection with the execution of this agreement are resolved in the Arbitration Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory

[Harry cuper]

And why conclude international treaties that are contrary to their own constitution? Is it either cheating or incompetence

[parusnik]

Is the supply of oil, gas, grain, weapons, the construction of nuclear power plants abroad a treason?

[Harry cuper]

Of course not. My remark was intended for the guardians of "national priority" over international law

[Vikxnumx]

Is the supply of oil, gas, grain, weapons, the construction of nuclear power plants abroad a treason?

For the buyer's money - business.
For the money of taxpayers of the Russian Federation (on credit at a purely conditional percentage ...) - treason.

[Grading]

I’ll tell you a terrible secret and be sure to tell your teammates of the Kremlin boats from Lakhta about this, you can terminate international agreements without amending the constitution, but Gazprom will have to pay Poland in any case

[akunin]

here is digging up, everything is not unique

Accordingly, in connection with this, in part 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation states that “Generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system.” In accordance with Part 1 of Art. 17 “In the Russian Federation, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen are recognized and guaranteed in accordance with generally recognized principles and norms of international law and in accordance with this Constitution.”

But directly the “priority” of international law is enshrined in the second sentence of Part 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation "If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply."

This constitutional norm follows, first of all, from the principle of binding international treaties enshrined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Is this “priority” absolute, i.e. What is the role of international law in the hierarchy of Russian legislation?

No, it is not absolute - only the Constitution of the Russian Federation has absolute supremacy.

This position is reflected in the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 14.07.2015, 21 N 15-P .: “Since Russia, in the sense of Articles 1 (parts 4 and 79), 125 and 6 (part XNUMX) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, is not entitled to conclude international treaties, not corresponding to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, but the rules of an international treaty, if they violate constitutional provisions, which are undoubtedly especially important for Russia, they cannot and should not be applied in its legal system based on the supremacy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation ... ”

Thus, there is "priority", but it is not absolute. But nevertheless, since Part 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the amendments do not affect, then it is not necessary to talk about the elimination of "priority" in this part in any case, but at the same time, as indicated above, this priority lies in the priority of the norms enshrined in the treaties of the Russian Federation, which the Russian Federation itself signed ... Those. certain norms of international law that are applied in the event of a conflict with the norms of Russian legislation, apart from the will of the Russian Federation, cannot appear in its legal space, since there are specific forms of expressing the consent of the Russian Federation to be bound by an international treaty "ratification", "approval", "acceptance "and" joining ".

[aglet]

"... They gave 3 lard to Ukraine for gas, 1,5 lard to Poland, for gas, and you know, life has somehow become better, life has become more fun, breathe more freely ... Don't you think?"
drowned in the water sp-2, buried the power of Siberia in the ground, finally it became good. "OK, Grigory? excellent, Constantine!"

[Lannan Shi]

Quote: Nikolai S.

Of course, sovereignty is not interesting. We give back $ 50 billion. Hodor, $ 500bn. for a plane shot down by Sumerians, what else they say and how much they say - and then Roman will have a good life.

In the constitution of the Russian Federation you can write anything. Although the priority of our legislation over the world, even Putin as the god of the sun and the lord of the ocean. However ... I will draw what kind of international arbitration a fine for something, and we will pay. For it is deeply violent to arbitration what Mr. Putin invented there. And we will pay. Despite all the notes. For the arrests of accounts, etc. will go.

[Stas1973]

You first figure out about Nevsky. Who, where, when and for what.

[210ox]

Tell me. And how will the amendments to the Constitution prevent the arrest of the property of Russian companies over the hill? This is to the question "give to Hodor"

[zontov79]

You, dear, have now farted into a puddle, to be honest, how will our constitution affect the arrest of our property abroad ??

[210ox]

No effect. So why these amendments on the priority of Russian legislation over foreign? Pure populism. For in reality it will not work; courts in London or Stockholm will impose sanctions and recover in all available ways. They do not care what the Russians have written there.

[CBR600]

if these courts are presented as "International Law", then it is even easier to present Russia and the rest of the world with this right. It remains to find out which countries recognize the sovereignty of Russian law from international law. It sounds again that the USSR has no allies except the army, aviation and navy. This is how the Second World War happened. All countries rallied around fascist Germany. Now the country is not needed either; International Law is enough. New Warsaw Treaty, such as the "Organization of the Eurasian Treaty", the return of the republics, the golden ruble ...

[dim6600]

Very interesting about sovereignty. What changes are proposed in the constitution? Article number in the studio.

[SRC P-15]

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas.

Well, would many new promises be made to the Constitution and what, would Roman’s life improve from this? Doubtful! Remember the paragraph in the old Constitution on pensions - at 60 and 55. Well, how did this help in raising the retirement age to 65 and 60? So with any other points it would be and will be the same!

[snake]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Well, would many new promises be made to the Constitution and what, would Roman’s life improve from this? Doubtful!

That's right.

[Deck]

Everything there is what you need. Not to you? But who cares!

[Uncle lee]

We are not in the center, do not expect!

[Malyuta]

Quote: Svarog

Personally, I also did not see anything that would at least hint in the future could be reflected in positive transformations. At the same time, zeroing, strengthening of the sole authority, irresponsibility (or non-jurisdiction) is clearly visible.

The task of the current government since 1991 is to plunder the Soviet legacy and mineral resources, but any crime should be punished, now the newcomers want to hide behind the constitution.

[AU Ivanov.]

And what was there to rob? Except for a few industries that are now successfully operating. As for the rest, it’s a wonderful marquise, either to turn over ancient equipment to metal, or invest crazy billions into modernization, without any guarantees that the products of these enterprises will at least come close to similar ones from developed countries.

[Kronos]

Anti adviser is always lying

[AU Ivanov.]

Putin is completely right about the galoshes. We were able to make weapons, nuclear technology, missile - those industries in which we competed with developed countries. What they did for the domestic market: cars, consumer goods, agricultural machinery, did not climb into any gate, it was a shame for the country that first sent people into space. No wonder the people voted in rubles for imported goods, preferring them to domestic, as soon as the choice appeared.

[Kronos]

Cars and consumer goods were sold abroad for a long time all your lies were dismantled by the storm messenger

[AU Ivanov.]

Where to abroad? To the countries of Africa? To Cuba? To other vassals. Have you seen a lot of our products in developed countries? Isolated cases and then not for long. What kind of clothes were our citizens choking in the queues: for domestic or foreign? Which cars, at the earliest opportunity, were replaced by both motorists and pros? What kind of aircraft did the aircraft switch to as soon as the price of kerosene jumped? And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

[Kronos]

In the country's trap, including trade statistics of the USSR

[AU Ivanov.]

And more? There was a time and "Muscovites" went for export, went to the West, though not for long. Because you cannot keep the same model, even if it is successful, for years on the conveyor - you have to switch to a new model line. And where are these new lines, despite the fact that there were very decent new developments? Of course, the plan for the shaft and the shaft according to the plan is better, but the people still go for it - there was no way to buy an imported wheelbarrow. The country, which was ahead of everyone in space and nuclear energy, could not (or did not want) to make a worthy product for the people, the same notorious jeans? Shame.

[Serwid]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

Where to abroad?

Well, for example, in 1991 in Germany there were Lada car dealerships.

[AU Ivanov.]

In the early 90s, I often visited Germany, in its western part. It was almost impossible to see Lada on the road. As a rule, they were driven by "awns"

[Serwid]

Probably Aussie. But salons existed. And NIVA is still found. And it's not that rare.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

In the early 90s, I often visited Germany, in its western part. It was almost impossible to see Lada on the road.

That year, in the 90th, the Anglican police bought Niva.

[DVR]

Cars and consumer goods were sold abroad for a long time all your lies were dismantled by the storm messenger

About "Bulletin of the Storm", "Left Front" and many other similar resources and organizations have long been known: who feeds them, who supervises and what they want. They feed from the same trough as Navalny, I. Ponomarev, and other Gudkovs, Udaltsovs and Kasparovs.

The editor-in-chief and the “face” of The Herald of the Storm is Andrei Rudoy, ​​a history teacher by training, the author of the sites Left Front, Rabkor and Ekho Moskvy. Since 2015 - an active figure (now co-chair) of the Teacher union. The editor-in-chief of Rabkor magazine is Boris Kagarlitsky, director of the Institute for Globalization and Social Movements, recognized in December 2018 as a foreign agent for cooperation with the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation ...

Ore, who calls himself a "radical Marxist", since 2011 - member of the executive committee of the Nizhny Novgorod branch of the "Left Front", and in January 2013 at the Third Congress of the "Front" was elected, along with Ponomarev, to the board of the organization.

Here are a couple of quotes from Rudogo:

President Putin ... recorded himself among those who defend “the values ​​of a traditional family, a genuine human life, including religious life” ... “A traditional family” is no longer possible. It is destroyed by the historical process itself and cannot be restored ... By the way, in such circumstances it becomes possible to legitimize same-sex marriages ... To deny the pattern of coming to this seems pointless ...

I would recommend the left to speak in defeatist positions: Russia must lose the “Ukrainian game” ... I consider this outcome to be most beneficial not only for the left opposition in Russia, but also for the country and the people as a whole ... I sincerely wish Putin to lose in this matter. ..

[Kronos]

Expresses quite sound thoughts

[DVR]

Okay then)

[Kronos]

These quoted quotes exposing Rudogo I have already met the guards do not change

[DVR]

And Rudoi was able to refute these and many other other disclosures, including his quotes, or did not find it necessary?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: DVR

Okay then)

You give references to these quotes from Rudogo, please, otherwise they will catch phrases from the context, as usual. As for the inagents, according to current laws, if your, for example, a fund receives an anonymous donation in bitcoins, then there is already an indent. Today this is not an indicator.

[DVR]

https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1270376-echo/
https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1218043-echo/
Read in the original, the blog of Rudy himself on the site "Echo of Moscow".
Okay, don’t bother yourself with answers, we won’t spend time on each other.
And then you’ll start now about contexts and stuff. These quotes in any context for me are an abomination, well conveying the essence of man.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: DVR

https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1270376-echo/
https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1218043-echo/
Read in the original, the blog of Rudy himself on the site "Echo of Moscow".
Okay, don’t bother yourself with answers, we won’t spend time on each other.
And then you’ll start now about contexts and stuff. These quotes in any context for me are an abomination, well conveying the essence of man.

Thanks for the links, who wants to understand, read. I want to remind you that pieces of text connected by ellipsis that do not convey the idea of ​​the text are not quotations. This is common demagoguery. With such "quotes", according to Mein Kampf, I can prove to you that Hitler loved the Jews.

[DVR]

This is common demagoguery. With such "quotes", according to Mein Kampf, I can prove to you that Hitler loved the Jews.

Prove, don't be a cormorant.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: DVR

Prove, don't be a cormorant.

For example: "The Jews in this world will always rule ... and ... all correct concepts of the beautiful, the sublime, the noble and the good ... are invented by them."
https://mylib.pro/ru/book/adolf-gitler-1/moya-borba#google_vignette
In your opinion is this a quote? You can see the rules of citation here: https://orfogrammka.ru/OGL03/70091470.html
And today, intentionally or not, but you are a liar and a manipulator.

[DVR]

For example: "The Jews in this world will always rule ... and ... all correct concepts of the beautiful, the sublime, the noble and the good ... are invented by them."
https://mylib.pro/ru/book/adolf-gitler-1/moya-borba#google_vignette
In your opinion is this a quote? You can see the rules of citation here: https://orfogrammka.ru/OGL03/70091470.html
And today, intentionally or not, but you are a liar and a manipulator.

I usually don't respond to comments like this. To my sincere regret, you, like many of your like-minded people, reduce the discussion to the plane of insanity, moving away from the essence of the questions, I am not interested. I will make an exception, nevertheless I offered you to play the game "do not be a cormorant", and you agreed. Let's see what happened. Here you write:

I want to remind you that pieces of text connected by ellipsis that do not convey the idea of ​​the text are not quotations. This is common demagoguery. With such "quotes", according to Mein Kampf, I can prove to you that Hitler loved the Jews.

Let’s take the following excerpts from Rudogo’s blog:

President Putin ... recorded himself among those who defend “the values ​​of a traditional family, a genuine human life, including religious life” ... “A traditional family” is no longer possible. It is destroyed by the historical process itself and cannot be restored ... By the way, in such circumstances it becomes possible to legitimize same-sex marriages ... To deny the pattern of coming to this seems pointless ...

Now let's look at the context of Rudogo’s article without ellipses. At the beginning of the article, Rudoi criticizes the President because GDP expresses commitment to conservative values. Here is the exact text without ellipses:

Also he recorded himself among those who defend “the values ​​of the traditional family, genuine human life, including religious life"life, not only material, but also spiritual, the values ​​of humanism and the diversity of the world."

Then Rudoy talks about the "traditional family" that Putin mentioned, and interprets his words, descending into some kind of nonsense about the patriarchal family and the lack of rights of women.

What is “traditional family” in Putin’s view? What is formed as a result of marriage today, or the “primary unit of society” 50-70 years ago, or, perhaps, what existed 200-300 years ago? These are different models of the family - and this must be understood. It is impossible to “preserve” a family, proceeding at least from economic prerequisites.

Any sane person can understand what Putin meant when he spoke of the "traditional family." This is precisely what was reflected in one of the amendments to the Constitution. And where does Ruda, so protected by you, take us? Rudoy says that as a result of progress and emancipation, a "traditional family" is impossible. Here is literally:

The emancipation of women was the logical outcome of these processes, and now we see how the so-called "Weaker sex" gives odds to men in many areas. A free and economically independent woman does not need to endure a hated spouse; she has the opportunity to predetermine her future herself. In such circumstances, the “traditional family” is no longer possible. It is destroyed by the historical process itself and cannot be restored - everything goes exactly as Engels had predicted. By the way, it is in such conditions that the legalization of same-sex marriage becomes possible. The latter can be treated differently, but to deny the pattern of coming to this seems pointless.

Rudoi says same-sex marriage is a natural outcome of progress. To give his text a certain "intellectuality", Rudoy mentions Berdyaev and Hegel, but it is even absurd to comment on this, as well as the continuation of his article. Only a very poorly educated and narrow-minded person can recognize this writing as clever and intellectual. Rudoy asserts, twisting Hegel and Engels, that pederastic marriages are an inevitable result of evolution, and everything else (culture, traditions, religion, social rejection in the end, etc.) does not matter. Maybe Rudoy really wants this, since he makes such paradoxical conclusions? You it so zealously defend, calling me a manipulator and a liar? And where are my manipulations and lies? As you can see, all the ellipses in those excerpts from the Rudogo blog are set for only one purpose - to shorten the text, the content is not distorted, and even more embellished. In those excerpts, I did not reflect the whole abomination of Rudogo's mental thoughts. I agree with you in one 100%:

Thanks for the links, who wants to figure it out, read it.

I will cite these links to Rudoy's blog on the Echo Moskvy radio site once again, let people read and understand.
https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1270376-echo/
https://echo.msk.ru/blog/rudoyandrey/1218043-echo/
As for the second article from Rudoy's blog, everything is much simpler. In the text of Rudoy I quoted, the meaning is also not distorted. I cannot cite the entire article, but I am not distorting the meaning. The author's position is clear, in the article he reveals the reasons for such a position - hatred of Putin and the oligarchs. This is 100% Vlasov's position. You have lost the game you agreed to play. Do you have to put a lot of ellipsis in your "quotes", or did you think that people cannot check? But your logic is clear - the text consists of words, words from letters, therefore, almost any text can be used to make any text

[AU Ivanov.]

Are you about gay marriage? Undoubtedly a good idea.

[Grading]

People hawala 20 years what has changed?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

And what was there to rob?

Was there nothing? As usual, you carry "protective" nonsense.

[Vadim237]

A planned economy built from above for everything in the country is always a deficit and technical backwardness, especially if this economy is skewed towards the military-industrial complex in the USSR and shifted to this direction from the end of the 50s - the civilian sector is completely out of football marketing no high tech no materials are in short supply like specialists their defense industry enterprises took their developments and inventions privately; it’s impossible to do private business prohibited equipment tools and materials no innovation at enterprises prevents the implementation of the plan - since everything was scheduled for five years. That’s the answer why in the West, so many trillions produce and earn on this - their client base has been forming all 69 years in the market while we were engaged in planned garbage in the 90s and all civilian products were played out physically and mentally outdated there were no buyers for it and the giants remained plants without orders, almost nobody started bending and eventually bent, except for speculators, security guards and those who started to delve into the market at the end of the 80s and didn’t know what to do in the new market conditions - numerous scammers took advantage of this ignorance and robbed part of the population and the state taking the money of the enterprise and the factories that were able to work in the new conditions put the money in their pocket those that were bent over were let into scrap metal or for renting the premises and the country was in fact bankrupt, there was no money for anything, all taxes went past the cashier sent prices for free swimming began to borrow money the IMF collapsed in 1998, which led to default, it became yet another m a serious blow to the Russian economy.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Vadim237

it is always a deficit and technical backwardness especially if this economy is skewed towards

I willingly believe you))) Look at the development of Soviet industry in the 30s and 70s. I’ll tell you a secret, China still has a planned economy.

[AU Ivanov.]

China has long had a market economy, with elements of planning. Plus private ownership of the means of production, including large ones. This is the secret of their success.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

China has long had a market economy, with elements of planning. Plus private ownership of the means of production, including large ones. This is the secret of their success.

Has our shoot everywhere ripened? In China, the planned economy, there is something like the Soviet NEP, though it was very protracted.

[AU Ivanov.]

And under the NEP, there were such private industrial giants as Huawei, Lifan, BBK? Which work mainly on the foreign market, but not according to plan.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

Which work mainly on the foreign market, but not according to plan.

Are you sure not according to plan?

[AU Ivanov.]

Planning is in any economy, including even such a libertarian one as in the USA. This is infrastructure, energy, etc. But if the enterprise operates on the foreign market and successfully competes with other manufacturers, then it is clearly not planned.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

But if the company operates on a foreign market and successfully competes with other manufacturers, then it is clearly not planned.

What you wrote is sheer stupidity. In your opinion, if the fish farm sends part of the catch, for example, to Poland, then it is excluded from the planned economy?

[AU Ivanov.]

How can you plan the demand in the foreign market? Play prices in the competition, conduct exchange operations? A planned economy cannot do this; it is inflexible. Plan and competition are incompatible.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

How can you plan the demand in the foreign market? Play prices in the competition, conduct exchange operations? A planned economy cannot do this; it is inflexible.

It does a great job. Look at the example of China. Or do you think the leadership of the USSR did not plan export-import operations? It is all 70 years old, it turned out by itself?

[bk0010]

Even under Stalin there were cooperatives that worked for the defense industry.

[AU Ivanov.]

And here are the cooperatives? Under Stalin, were cooperatives independently trading in foreign markets?

[Motorist]

Quote: Vadim237

the economy is skewed towards the military-industrial complex in the USSR

Well, towards the military-industrial complex there was a bias for no reason, of course ... Put punctuation marks, please.

[didra]

I fully share your position on this issue！ Unfortunately, comprehension of history, especially the recent one, comes slowly and hard （we are too embedded in the historical process）. We do not pay attention to the minuses, they characterize the minus. In general, on this thread, if a person has more than 5 minuses, then this is a thoughtful person.

[ruivit1988]

Here are some interesting numbers.

"In 1979, the park of industrial robots in Japan was 7,5 - 10 thousand, in the United States - 4 thousand. It took almost 15 years for the fleet of industrial robots in the United States to reach 1983 thousand by 8.
In 1985, the USSR fleet of industrial robots reached approximately 40 thousand units.
In Russia in 2016, 359 industrial robots were sold. "In a planned economy, the introduction of automation or automated production lines into the industry is very important, since manual labor seriously violates these plans. So everything with the planned economy was good and it is much better. than the dictatorship of capital and the market. The fact that the USSR collapsed and the reason is not that the planned economy is worthless and not progressive, but that the litas of the USSR destroyed and betrayed the country and the working people. Because they wanted to live and boast of it. Source: https: //depot-robots.livejournal.com/28050.html

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vadim237

and the giants factories left without orders began to bend and eventually bent

Vadik, where did your grandfather get a workshop with a fraser machine?

[vVvAD]

Vadim, so that you know that modern Western economies have taken over from the USSR both economic planning and GOSTs (have you heard about HASP?), The brigade principle of work (now this is team work), and much more. And, yes: they can be called PLANNED with the only difference being that the level of planning is simpler.
Under Stalin's planned economy, artels, cooperatives and other options for private initiative developed, prices became cheaper, there was a surge in the birth rate, a technological leap, and the country destroyed by the war was rebuilt and became a superpower without any Marshall plans in the conditions of the world economic unleashed against it by the "civilized" and the "developed" Western world.

[210ox]

An example of China. Not..?

[AU Ivanov.]

China began to pursue market reforms in the late 70s, without shocks and disasters. So the result arrived.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

China began to pursue market reforms in the late 70s, without shocks and disasters. So the result arrived.

Remind me which party still continues to rule in China?

[AU Ivanov.]

The inscription on the barn does not always correspond to its contents. A communist party in whose ranks are dollar billionaires? The bearded classics in a coffin do not spin?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

The inscription on the barn does not always correspond to its contents. A communist party in whose ranks are dollar billionaires? The bearded classics in a coffin do not spin?

Not so long ago, you told me about the Communist Party and later the Communist Party spoke quite differently, and I wrote to you (if I'm not mistaken) about the barn. Does your position change depending on the circumstances?

[GELEZNII_KAPUT]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

And what was there to rob? Except for a few industries that are now successfully operating. As for the rest, it’s a wonderful marquise, either to turn over ancient equipment to metal, or invest crazy billions into modernization, without any guarantees that the products of these enterprises will at least come close to similar ones from developed countries.

I was here at the spirit of military factories, ancient equipment is still working, but for some reason there is no new one, and the owners are still not the oligarchs.

[AU Ivanov.]

So they are military, defense. If they were civilians, they would go broke in an instant on ancient equipment. Well, either modernized

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

So they are military, defense. If they were civilians, they would go broke in an instant on ancient equipment. Well, either modernized

The point is not, but the fact that the present state and "effective owners" do not want to invest money in modernization, they are only filling their pockets.

[AU Ivanov.]

Well, what can you do: I also went broke. My product was uncompetitive. This is the norm. The one who can offer the best survives.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

Well, what can you do: I also went broke. My product was uncompetitive. This is the norm. The one who can offer the best survives.

Including the defense industry?

[AU Ivanov.]

The defense industry enjoys state support. And initially this industry segment competed with the world's leading manufacturers, therefore, at the level.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: AS Ivanov.

The defense industry enjoys state support. And initially this industry segment competed with the world's leading manufacturers, therefore, at the level.

In our country, any large corporation enjoys state support, but they don’t want to invest money in modernization, they only fill their pockets. Nornickel is a prime example.

[Svarog]

Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT

I was here at the spirit of military factories, ancient equipment is still working, but for some reason there is no new one, and the owners are still not the oligarchs.

So take the energy sector ... for example, a hydroelectric power station ... have you built at least one new one? They use everything Soviet and do not worry, at the same time they do not forget to pour mud, they say there was nothing but galoshes ..

[AU Ivanov.]

8 nuclear power plants over the past 12 years is not enough?

[Motorist]

Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT

ancient equipment is still working, but for some reason there’s no new

I don’t know what’s at the military factories, but I’ll tell you this: in my industry, I would prohibit "modern" "high-tech" equipment in general due to low reliability and no maintainability!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Motorist

no maintainability!

A couple of days ago they went over an ordinary kitchen hood. This is a complete bummer. Everything was almost one-time, and in addition a couple of screws under the triangle, I had to grind the electrode to unscrew them.

[GELEZNII_KAPUT]

Quote: Motorist

I don’t know what’s at the military factories, but I’ll tell you this: in my industry, I would ban "modern" "high-tech" equipment in general because of low reliability and no maintainability!

The problem is that we simply do not manufacture this high-tech equipment and don’t understand a damn about it ... and yes, after exchanging nuclear strikes, the stone ax is the most reliable.

[WIKI]

Quote: Svarog

Personally, I also did not see anything that would at least hint in the future could be reflected in positive transformations

The president must ensure the progress of society, methods appropriate to the culture of this society. In our case, this is true, freedom and justice. On the face there are some cons in all positions. And what difference does it make, what color is a cat, if it did not catch mice earlier, then it will behave in the same way in the future. .

[iouris]

And how many terms in a row in economics and finance, HSE, etc. are the "leaders" all the same? And none of the "sane" about "zeroing" their terms does not stutter.

[Mazuta]

Don't you think this is a "game of thimbles"?

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

At the same time, zeroing, strengthening of the sole authority, irresponsibility (or non-jurisdiction) is clearly visible .. in general sadness ..

I always said that our nullified tsar-father would finally finish Russia.
Only me always for this minus or comments are deleted, and then another warning.

[siberalt]

Shame, of course, when the Constitution guarantees a salary of at least a healthy, working citizen of the Russian Federation, so as not to die of hunger.
With medicine, some kind of turbidity again,
type: subjects of the federation and municipalities will treat within their competence !? What is it like? And where did the municipalities get the money for this, if the local industry is destroyed and there is no work. Or there was no talk about equal pay for doctors without taking into account their place of work. BUT how to correlate responsible behavior in relation to animals and the Constitution of the state, they just boil. Or, the provision on the separation of church and state already spelled out in the Constitution to put God on a globe like an owl? And what has God to do with it, if faith is a voluntary matter, and what has the Constitution to do with it, if the Russian Federation is not a religious, but a civilized state? And who are "volunteers" on a par with respect for the Russian language? I did not see the amendment abolishing the supremacy of international law over national law. And if this norm is not canceled, then how will the new ones act, where everything is only through the Constitutional Court. Yes, cancel the old rule and the court will have less work to check each new treaty and decisions of international courts. Or is it scary to write it down? Is it not because the government hides behind the opinion of the people and arranged a universal suffrage, which is not spelled out either in the Laws or in the Constitution. Why the article on the termination of parliamentary powers at the request of voters has not been introduced. Why are we afraid to elect local judges and local police leaders? What is the danger for the state? But now we will beware of stepping on a hedgehog in the forest, unless, of course, they will still be allowed into the forest.
Roman full respect!

[Dimmedroll]

And where did you see the zeroing and the sole Power. Apparently we read various amendments.

[bandabas]

Market price is one thing, another is an unprincipled and actual slave drive. That is precisely why in 1917 they did not begin to search for other capitalists. Current ones do not seem to want to understand this.

[iouris]

Quote: bandabas

Market price is one thing, another is an unprincipled and actual slave drive.

And the slave owner feeds the slaves. A slave is his property.
And Marx has a work on the situation of the English (!) Proletarians in England (!!), where he explores the problem: what will the proletariat do when the price of labor becomes lower than the minimum wage. Read. The answer is: he will lie under the fence and die, but will not work.

[Thrifty]

Please return the opportunity to put a minus article! How much can you read nonsense that we are nobody and our voices have nothing and never affect! So the author can agree on the need for a coup in Russia, as a way to change the Kremlin’s political course! To the author, leave the people the opportunity to decide whether to go to the polls, or not to go! Do not impose your opinion, using the fact that you are a site administrator! Write better about warships - at least you don't actively impose your opinion on them! !!!!

[Vladimir61]

The new column "Opinions" lowered VO to the level of authority of "Echo of Moscow", "Meduza" and "RusoBalt" among the majority of Russian citizens! It was not for nothing that the "Support" banner appeared, many simply left, probably those who sponsored the advertising, did not consider it more necessary to spoil their nerves.
There is only one cure! Either VO will return to its original appearance, or moderators will appear who will sweep out the entire vagrant and anti-Russian riffraff, or a new site will open which will discuss military news, military construction, military history and art, technical innovations and the international situation, which, in one way or another affects the security of the Russian Federation!

[Vladimir61]

Your cons to me ... balm for the soul! So, I made a bunch of Russophobes, connoisseurs of Western values ​​and other "lovers of Russia" get nervous.
Our ancestors at the front and in the rear defeated fascism and we will defeat you!
All a Happy Holiday! Hooray!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vladimir61

Our ancestors at the front and in the rear defeated fascism and we will defeat you!

My ancestors did not defeat fascism so that I would live in capitalism, a traitor.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Mordvin 3

My ancestors did not defeat fascism so that I would live in capitalism, a traitor.

Apparently you and your ancestors had a different homeland!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vladimir61

Apparently you and your ancestors had a different homeland!

I, like my grandfathers, who stormed Berlin and climbed into a minefield under shelling, have one Motherland. This is the Soviet Union.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Mordvin 3

Homeland alone. This is the Soviet Union

Yes! But they did not measure their homeland with a piece of fat and green candy wrappers ...

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vladimir61

But they did not measure their homeland with a piece of fat and green candy wrappers ...

That's it.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Mordvin 3

That's it.

So which of us is a traitor? You can’t answer, it’s not interesting ...

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vladimir61

You can’t answer, it’s not interesting ...

What, break the pattern? Think for yourself, your head is not only about wearing a cap.

[Russian jacket]

Fully headed by you. Sometimes I look at VO analytics and that's all .... VO apparently decided to beat the echo of matzah, rbk, rain, jellyfish and babr combined.

[bk0010]

Quote: Thrifty

To the author, leave the people the opportunity to decide whether to go to the polls, or not to go!

And what, does the author rob the people of the opportunity to decide? And something I did not see your indignant comments in the articles for the amendments, saying that there is nothing to drive people to the polls and force them to vote for the amendments. Why so one-sided?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Thrifty

Please return the opportunity to put a minus article! How much can you read nonsense that we are nobody and our voices have nothing and never affect! So the author can agree on the need for a coup in Russia, as a way to change the Kremlin’s political course! Auto RU, leave the people the opportunity to decide whether to go to the polls, or not to go! Do not impose your opinion, using the fact that you are a site administrator! Write better about warships - at least you don't actively impose your opinion on them! !!!!

Very correct comment. It is a pity that there is no technical opportunity to put you more than one plus.
PS- I also did not understand what confuses the author so much, if evaluating the above in general, we can conclude that the Old Constitution has not worked for a long time, and the new Constitution will still not work, that is, the guarantees guaranteed by the Constitution "under the guarantee" were not fulfilled, are not and will not be executed. Now what? Life in the old constitutional "field", as well as life in the new constitutional "field", is equally unsuitable "for fattening the" fat "masses of the people, and therefore it is necessary to change the country as a" grazing field ", together with registration? To do what? Should we vote for “no guarantees” in case of non-compliance with “existing” ones, or not go, and remain proudly unvoted within the framework of non-observed “existing” ones in spite of the future “no guarantee” ones? What was the call for?

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life

So it’s from the old Constitution, there’s practically nothing left

[Mazuta]

"...to do what..."
To begin with, turn on the brain, and this is what the author calls for ...

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Mazuta

"...to do what..."
To begin with, turn on the brain, and this is what the author calls for ...

Well, thanks to the author, your Mazuta brain has turned on, so what? After reading the article, and gaining incredible enlightenment, what you decided to live under the old-style Constitution, which judging by the author’s thoughts no longer promises a good life for him, or living under the new Constitution, which, according to the same author, doesn't promise yet good life? Which of the Constitutions (old or new) promises a good life for you personally, with the brain turned on? As for me, both of them do not answer what I would like to see in the end, because a request in society for a fair coexistence of the state and the citizen, is much wider and the option of returning the USSR model to the Constitution, would be preferable. But who will allow this?

[siberalt]

Minuses are needed for those who cannot think and have nothing to answer, look at the pictures of the picture, and even anonymously "mark" their presence. If we also minus author's articles, the site will turn into a repost of articles from the media and the Internet. Do you need it?

[TANKISTONE]

iouris (iouris) If something doesn’t suit you, find another capitalist.

Like, slave, find yourself a new master ???

[Talipov Rustam]

And who will let you find another capitalist? Remembering the same K. Marx, for a 300 percent profit, the capitalist will commit any crime, imagine that the obstacle is that you or your family will not be the obstacle to this profit? If you feel good today this does not mean that you will not feel bad tomorrow. The state is a social contract if one of the parties violates it, it turns out either dictatorship or anarchy horseradish radish is not sweeter the state will die anyway

[vVvAD]

iourus, and why on earth should I look for some kind of capitalist, if I did not vote for the dissolution of the USSR and did not approve of it, and I am not very interested in the twists and turns of the "market" economy?
In general, it is as market-oriented as the oligopoly and the cartel. And it can only pump out resources and pollute the planet in the name of endless enrichment. Its prospects are a dump or a nuclear desert.
The development of fundamental science, the scientific examination of political decisions, economic and social planning and urban planning, resource-saving technologies, rational nature management and the desire to ensure the maximum service life and thrifty attitude to things and food products, limiting production and consumption by a reasonable framework of objective needs; protection of the biosphere and health, social standards of life and the protection of family and childhood, universal education and development of talents of all members of society in the name of the common good; ensuring equal opportunities for people of different sexes, races, religions, worldviews, abilities and levels of affluence; the desire to openly defend one’s point of view, to negotiate and make decisions, to do this not by a minority or majority, but by universal consensus and, as a result, the desire for peace are NOT generated by capitalism, are NOT its attributes, moreover, they are contrary to the thirst for profit as its main driving force .
If in order for capitalists simply not to destroy humanity by any of the hundreds of methods they use to enrich and gain power, it is necessary to limit their appetites by state coercion, which they see as an obstacle to unlimited power, try to circumvent or subjugate, then why should I to support the realm of the absurd, called a market economy?

[snake]

Interestingly, there will still be a poll on voting on the VO? There were links to other media resources. Why not spend here?

[ximkim]

I am for the local polling station.

[kot28.ru]

in Zhytomyr or in Lviv

[ximkim]

For a survey on the site.

[kot28.ru]

a priori virtual survey will not really show anything
you know very well that registering even one user with many accounts for voting is not a problem
you can do it gradually, in advance
we don’t have a binding of a mailbox to a passport
all or almost all is possible
so all virtual votes for or against the firebox
By the way, there are special programs for voting

[snake]

Even if the scale of one site is an objective vote - a problem, then what happens on the scale of an entire country ..?

[Konstantin Shevchenko]

Countries or countries?

[Mazuta]

That is, a farce in several areas suits you?

[MBRSS]

I join the vote in the VO.

[SRC P-15]

Quote: serpent

Interestingly, there will still be a poll on voting on the VO? There were links to other media resources. Why not here

Do you need this brain rupture? Here - this is one thing, but in the wild so-o-o-all the other numbers!

[snake]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Here - this is one thing, but in the wild so-o-o-all other numbers

It will be more honest here, I think. Well, at the same time, it is curious to look at the mood of the participants in the VO.

[SRC P-15]

Quote: serpent

It will be more honest here, I think. Well, at the same time, it is curious to look at the mood of the participants in the VO.

Honest for whom? There may be a majority of users not from Russia at all! Well, why do I need their opinion about the structure of life in my country?

[kot28.ru]

here one michan has more than a dozen accounts
more honest ???
when logging in with mobile IP every time is different

[snake]

Quote: SRC P-15

There may be a majority of users not from Russia at all!

Okay, I get it. In general, you must first create a poll on the topic: "Should I conduct a poll on voting for amendments."

[SRC P-15]

Quote: serpent

Okay, I get it. In general, you must first create a poll on the topic: "Do I need to conduct a poll on voting for amendments

[AK1972]

Quote: serpent

Interestingly, there will still be a poll on voting on the VO?

I support, Sergey! Then we will have the opportunity to compare the results of the survey on the forum with the results that the CEC will announce to us. And for some reason I have no doubt that even taking into account the presence on the site of biased bots that work from several IP addresses, these results will be very significantly different from the TsIKovsky ones.
And there are three questions to ask: 1. Have you voted for the amendments? 2. Have you voted against the amendments? 3. Did you vote?

[snake]

Quote: AK1972

And there are three questions to ask: 1. Have you voted for the amendments? 2. Have you voted against the amendments? 3. Did you vote?

Maybe a little more:
1. Went - for (forced).
2. Went - for (of his own free will).
3. Went - against (forced).
4. Went - against (of his own free will).
5. Did not go (of his own free will).
6. Did not go (for some reason).
But this is if after the official vote.
And if before him, then it’s easier: I’ll go - for / against, I won’t go.

[codetalker]

What if the result is not the same as Comrade Skomorokhov convinces us?)

[rocket757]

Will the amendments change anything for the workers?
The question is not even rhetorical, it .... in short, it was not worth asking.
In the coordinate system that we have, everything is done for the ruling, privileged class and their servants, and the rest are .... in the forest, for example.
However, this is no exception, against the background of everyone else around us. It is a fact.

[unaha]

"find yourself another capitalist" - do we really have capitalism? When is the largest capitalist the state? And not just a capitalist, but also a monopolist in the mass of industries. And market mechanisms work exclusively in small businesses.
We have some kind of corporate feudal oligopoly.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: unaha

corporate feudal oligopoly.

[paul3390]

And what - someone expected that the non-ruling ruling class, the bourgeois, themselves will get into their own pocket or something? Or will they sacrifice at least some of their stolen profits for the sake of people? It's just not funny .. Bourgeois - he is, by definition, a fierce enemy of the people. Like any of his proteges in power .. With all that it implies ..

[mdsr]

Quote: paul3390

Bourgeois - he is by definition a fierce enemy of the people.

That's right. The dream of any employer is for people to work as much as possible and to pay them as little as possible or not at all. The dream of the capitalist state is to get as much money out of people as possible in the form of taxes and all kinds of fines, payments, and at the same time spend as little money on every citizen as possible. And, of course, so that he would die the very day after retirement. The current state is the worst enemy of the people.

[smart75]

That is why Henry Ford raised the minimum daily wage for workers from $ 1 to $ 5 (30 per week, about 30 now). He dreamed of robbing so that they could never buy his cars.
As a result, it began to produce and sell not 200, but 200 cars a year. Some bourgeois ride on them))

[Harry cuper]

Not the next, but the day BEFORE retirement!

[steelmaker]

I agree with the author 200% !!! Baykot election! Putin is not worthy of respect !!

[kot28.ru]

then don’t know that they voted for you as well

[a.hamster55]

You don’t like Putin, but will you like his receiver? Maybe you will remember him with longing, conducting a master class on eating baland and using bucket.

[mdsr]

Quote: a.hamster55

You don’t like Putin, but will you like his receiver? Maybe you will remember him longingly

Of course, listening to Putin's receiver is a pleasure so-so. But if you, suddenly, had in mind a successor, then you must immediately, at the stage of announcement, send him on a long erotic journey with his boss and with everything вedrom. Enough of putting up with the proteges of the oligarchs. Hurled for 30 years, stolen trillions of dollars, enough, time to pay the bills.

[a.hamster55]

If you are planning to send somewhere, then notify in advance, with the next pension I will send you an opposition kit (packing diapers, annual subscription to Kolyma Pravda)

[AU Ivanov.]

Do you naively think that the successor will not be from the proteges? One clan of oligarchy will be replaced by another and not the fact that it is less greedy.

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

You don’t like Putin, but will you like his receiver? Maybe you will remember him with longing, conducting a master class on eating baland and using bucket.

I did not like Yeltsin, but under Yeltsin there were at least specialists who were trained in the USSR.
Then Putin came and in the country everything became much worse.
I now, that Yeltsin should remember with a kind word or what?

[MBRSS]

That's right. I refuse to play in the extras of this cheap performance. What is noteworthy - a leaflet appeared on the porch door with an invitation to vote, in a frame and under glass. (There were no invitations to the Duma and presidential elections - neither at the entrance, nor in the mailbox.)

[To be or not to be]

"" "Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas" ""
"" - Tell me, Shura, honestly, how much money do you need to be happy? - asked Ostap. “Just count everything.”
“One hundred rubles,” Balaganov answered, regretfully tearing himself away from bread and sausage.
“No, you do not understand me.” Not today, but in general. For happiness. Clear? To make you feel good in the world.
Balaganov thought for a long time, smiling timidly, and finally announced that for complete happiness he needed 6400 rubles and that with this amount he would be very good in the world.
“Okay,” said Ostap, “get fifty thousand.” He unzipped a square bag on his lap and handed Balaganov five white bundles tied with twine. The flight engineer immediately lost his appetite. He stopped eating, hid the money in his pockets and no longer took his hands out of there.
- Is it really a plate? He asked admiringly.
“Yes, yes, plateau,” Ostap answered indifferently. - With a blue border. The client brought in the teeth. I waved my tail for a long time before I agreed to take it. Now I command the parade! I feel great. ”” (Ilf and Petrov Golden Calf)
But we do not expect too much from the capitalist state?

[parusnik]

But we do not expect too much from the capitalist state?

... For example: the milk rivers this time, the sour banks are two, the gingerbread houses are three and all this for 17000 ...

[parusnik]

To be or not to be Judging by the growing minuses to your comment ... books by Soviet authors will soon be burned at the stake. In public.

[To be or not to be]

The soldiers of the invisible front do not understand. That a negative result is also a result! And in my years the game in pluses and minuses is somehow funny

[parusnik]

On the one hand it’s funny. A little later it won’t be funny ... That's what saddens.

[Mazuta]

For Ilf and Petrov, only the "close-minded" can minus.
I do not share the position "to be ..."

[parusnik]

"Pro-American and Liberal" article. At the expense of the elections. It’s really bad. Someday, people will get tired of choosing the lesser evil and will vote for the greater. But even this more will be controlled by the ruling elite. For example, the same Navalny. He’s on a lead now. Do you want Navalny? There will come a time when they say Navalny - face!

[kotvov]

. The time will come when they say Navalny - face! ,,
I think Alexei, you understand that bulk, from the same team. The Kremlin just needs it to advance the interests of a certain group, from this team.

[Doccor18]

Item number 1. The ability to influence power

She was not de facto before, but now she will not be de jure.

Item number 2. About pensions and salaries

What future if PF are private. There are more and more pensioners working less and less. Not long is the day when it is officially banned.

Item number 3. Protecting History and Language

Well, how they cherish it - the Russian language can be seen at school. 2 foreign languages, English in the exam is compulsory, and hours of the Russian language are less and less. By the way, the physical education does not touch the clock. Our health is taken care of.

But why the impossibility of owning property abroad was made to the accounts and passports in the Constitution?

There is absolutely nothing sacred. Where to put it now?

I am very sorry that there will be no clause which says that the state guarantees the right to life and health at its own expense. What medicine has now been turned into in general is not even a conversation for the Constitution, but for the Criminal Code, since it is a crime

And I'm so sorry! But not for this, the Soviet health system, working like a clock, was ruined for 30 years to now guarantee honey. help. Only for money. And there is no money ... so it was better to engage in physical education at school ...

[loha]

As it was a non-binding leaflet, it will remain so,

[Ryaruav]

an ambitious napoleonchik and a liar, and people don’t want to see that every year the social group shrinks from socialism less and less, a poorly former party member and now deeply religious (probably does not observe the canons of Orthodoxy, a hypocrite, as he gave him the main pop divorce) studied in his bursa political economy and history hopes to die in his bed he has such chances, and then he does not think

[smart75]

"When voters can convey their will and opinion to deputies, senators, ministers, as is the case in the United States, for example, when the authorities understand the need to hear popular opinion."

Roman, have you been to the USA for a long time? In the know, how is the popular opinion of niggas getting to whites now? Or are you just too lazy to see the news, at least on the BBC, at least on CNN?

About the amendments - you deliberately forget about the continuity from the USSR and Russia, the status of the Russian language and the role of the Russian people, which was not present in ANY Constitutions.

And not "a trifle about gays and God" but about marriage between a man and a woman and the role of family and upbringing.
Unlike the Western world with 16 sexes and "parent # 2"

I am ashamed to write such an x..yun instead of criticizing the amendments!

[Olegater]

The author, as always to the point!
We exchange one flickin letter for another flicku letter. More convenient to the current updated. Just! Nothing new under the moon. As money was withdrawn abroad and had tamya rear, it will remain so. Tell me, does this literacy spell the rights of the people and their will? No, of course - why !!
I won’t go to vote, do I need it? It is upset later that my rights are not respected.
He lived without the former surviving and now with the new one you need to survive, not live.

[Sergej1972]

The author does not have a complete understanding of the functioning of the branches of power, of the relationship between the president, government, chambers of parliament, the formation of the Federation Council both now and in the new version of the Constitution. As a result, half-truth and partial misinformation. Why write about anything if you do not have a complete understanding of the functioning mechanism of various authorities?

[smart75]

The author does not need this. He fights with Putin, and does not notice the little things))

[AU Ivanov.]

Nuland is also fighting Putin. And how Poroshenko fought ...

[didra]

Because the fingers itch, so he scribbles.）

[mikh-korsakov]

I doubted whether to vote or not. This procedure with Tereshkova was painfully awkwardly arranged. But after reading an article by R. Skomorokhov. I decided - I definitely have to go, since he criticizes the amendments.

[parusnik]

I’m interested in one question: what will happen if they vote against, the amendments will not come into force, given that they have already been approved by the Federal Assembly, meetings of the constituent entities of the Federation. those. representatives of the people, and therefore the people?

[unaha]

What other "cons"? VTsIOM has already explained everything to you - 60% of the turnout, 70% for.
NO other sources (Levada, surveys in the TG, personal observations) confirm this result even closely. But for some reason there is confidence that this is the result that will be voiced by the CEC.

[parusnik]

Well, all the same .... if it is against, will the amendments be really canceled in the existing situation?

[bk0010]

There is no cancellation procedure. You can’t cancel them, just rewrite the constitution again.

[mikh-korsakov]

Alec, then Putin will resign because he will lose credibility. For all its shortcomings, he understands that power except bayonets is held by its authority. But democracy is a system of choices that are more agile and fun, but not the best. (Mikheev)

[parusnik]

Judging by the edits for which you are going to vote, he only thinks about it But everything is simple, this option is not provided for by law .... Py sy ... Your humor appreciated

[Egoza]

Bravo, Roman! Clear, short and to the point.

[demo]

We would love to live in a country with hard currency. But, alas, it is still liquid and gaseous with us and depends on how much oil and gas and at what price they will buy from us.

Although in gas station countries such as the UAE or Qatar, things are completely different ...

I read and doubted.
You need to get acquainted with the official data.

And what about "this case", say, in Saudi Arabia?
That's how.

This is a graph of the fluctuation of the national currency - riyal, in relation to the dollar.
From 01.10.1986/XNUMX/XNUMX to the present day "complete calm".
Well, who will explain to me "this miracle"?
Did they show this to Putin?
What about Nabiullina?
So that the "patriots" don't accuse me of something: https://ru.investing.com/currencies/usd-sar

[Zeev zeev]

Well here I can explain. The rial is tightly tied to the dollar, the rate is fixed and in relation to other currencies fluctuates along with the US currency.
Quote:
"To maintain the exchange rate of the national currency, Saudi Arabia uses the Monetary Council regime, in which the riyal is pegged to the US dollar (ISO 4217 code - USD) at a ratio of 3,75: 1"

[demo]

I know "this".
I'm interested in something else.
For the 34 years that the chart tells us, riyal has not changed its exchange rate.
We know the following.
The fall or growth of the national currency has many reasons.
One of which is surplus import or export.
Over the years, SA sold an increasing volume of oil.
Therefore, there should be a clear bias towards the dollar, the money supply.
What is clear is that all the "extra" dollars settled in the United States.
Those. The USA acted as a damper.
But those who want to live better today than yesterday, and tomorrow is better than today in this state of affairs does not become?
So with the growth of needs it is necessary to satisfy them.
Otherwise there will be a social explosion, but at the top.
This should have led the local central bank to print more local money.
Which, of course, happened.
But here comes the paradox.
There is no inflation in the country.
Which is unique in itself.

There is only one answer to the question about the stability of the currency.

The ban on the internal circulation of the dollar in the country.

Consequently, the growth or depreciation of the national currency is more an artificial manifestation of the desire of the rich to become richer than the natural processes of interaction of economies.
This is exactly what I was thinking and asking.

[parusnik]

This is what you have demonstrated, liberal and pro-American propaganda

[Aleksandre]

And the hamsters shouted "Uru"
And caps were thrown into the air.

[kotvov]

And the hamsters shouted "Uru"
And caps were thrown into the air,
Self-critical.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: kotvov

Self-critical.

It is unlikely that the potpots and zaputintsy will repeat this as a mantra, the templates will not allow it.

[kotvov]

You already decide. For the hamsters, just these same ,, potreota and zaputintsy ,, shout, even would say VOPSYUT. Although they themselves are, not just small animals, but mold eating the country.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: kotvov

You already decide. For the hamsters, just these same ,, potreota and zaputintsy ,, shout, even would say VOPSYUT. Although they themselves are, not just small animals, but mold eating the country.

You might think the so-called opps with antipathy never do stupid things and do not pronounce loud phrases. I confess in secret: it was addressed in principle to stupid of any colors, tints and shades that tomorrow bear what you put in them today, because they did not give birth to their opinions. And the nesting machine works Stakhanovsky, you can’t take it away from her.

[kotvov]

It depends on the quantity and quality. I do not consider myself an opp or what they are called there. I just understand, Putin led the country not there, and then a cliff.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: kotvov

I just understand, Putin led the country in the wrong direction, and then a cliff.

Yes, at times the same sensation swells in the gluteal muscles.

[prior]

The present constitution and its amendments legitimize pseudo-democratic slavery in Russia.

[alone]

Well, for complete joy, there is not enough amendment regarding the fact that the husband must fulfill his spouse's duty to his wife at least twice a week ..
P, C. If even the spouse fiercely does not digest the spouse

[Alf]

Quote: lonely

Well, for complete joy, there is not enough amendment regarding the fact that the husband must fulfill his spouse's duty to his wife at least twice a week ..
P, C. If even the spouse fiercely does not digest the spouse

I hope that this amendment will not specify that the spouse must be her own?

[alone]

Quote: Alf

I hope that this amendment will not specify that the spouse must be her own?

Well, about this we will find out after 2036

[ximkim]

Quote: kot28.ru

a priori virtual survey will not really show anything
you know very well that registering even one user with many accounts for voting is not a problem
you can do it gradually, in advance
we don’t have a binding of a mailbox to a passport
all or almost all is possible
so all virtual votes for or against the firebox
By the way, there are special programs for voting

Well, let's say that some of the users will use programs and bots on the site, they will tick one and the same. Let's look at the coin from the other side (without the CEC)

[codetalker]

There was one clever idea in the article, but its author for some reason did not want to develop it. But it’s a pity, because there is still hope that the author is not engaged in anti-Russian propaganda, but simply does not really understand what he is writing about.
“Can a person from the street become a governor? Not."
Really can not. And not only the senator, but also the minister, deputy, press secretary, etc.
And why? Putin banned? Not.
States (all) are not governed by positions, but by the management elite, which is organized into many corporate groups. Each has its own resource capabilities, managerial skills, ideological basis, moral principles and foreign ties. And each one takes care of creating its own personnel base (which for the most part includes all sorts of relatives and friends). Each person in the civil service was there due to the patronage of some group or the consensus of several. And the appointment procedure is a formalization of the result of this patronage or arrangements. To say that there is some kind of parliament, a court or something else (in any country) that is completely controlled by one person is simply impossible. Well, for example, Putin’s everything is so controlled that more than 75% of his instructions are not fulfilled ...
Changes that are being made to the appointment process for a number of posts increase the responsibility of elite groups for the activities of those individuals whom they “dragged”.
All other inventions of the author, unfortunately, do not even draw to the level of a school essay on social studies and do not deserve attention.

[unaha]

"Well, for example, Putin has everything under his control that more than 75% of his orders are not carried out" - oh well - orders! He, in fact, does not fulfill these promises ... Maybe he is not under his own control?

[Karabin]

Quote: unaha

Maybe he is not under his control?

Or maybe he ... isn't Putin?

[businessv]

Quote: codetalker

All other inventions of the author, unfortunately, do not even draw to the level of a school essay on social studies and do not deserve attention.

Are you sure about Russia? Didn't you hear VVP when it "dissolved" the previous cabinet of ministers? Are you not aware that appointments are made not according to knowledge of the material and professionalism, but according to the degree of loyalty to the President ?!
What and how happens with several levels of power below does not matter, due to the impossibility of these levels to influence the situation in the country as a whole, as well as the existing system of both power and the distribution of capital in the country. They, at these levels, are allowed to steal exactly as much as remains of the section above.

[codetalker]

appointments are not knowledge of the material and professionalism

Did I write such a heresy somewhere?

by degree of devotion to the President

Have you already thought of this? Can you give any confirmation of this tale in practice?

[Sergey Zhikharev]

Well, for example, Putin’s everything is so controlled that more than 75% of his instructions are not fulfilled ...

For 20 years he has been building the vertical of power, and one of four orders is being fulfilled. If such a situation (the director gives an order, but they do not fulfill it, and no organizational conclusions should be made) occurred in a regular company, then how soon would such a company go bankrupt?

[AleBors]

Article 3 of the Constitution says that the highest direct expression of the power of the people is a referendum and free elections. And what is a “nationwide vote”? Nowhere is it said that it is an expression of the power of the people. This is if casuistically approach ....
Does the all-Russian vote on amendments to the Constitution fall under the signs of a referendum? However, lawmakers do not call it a referendum for an understandable reason: the proposed rules for holding it strongly differ from the norms of the Federal Constitutional Law “On the Referendum of the Russian Federation”.
Instead, the deputies hastily came up with short voting rules and inserted them into the second article of the amendment law. And as a result: citizens are deprived of the guarantees that are provided for by law in a referendum: these are guarantees of checking the issue submitted to the referendum, the rules of campaigning for and against, the rules for financing such campaigning, the procedure for voting and vote counting under the supervision of representatives of various political forces, and responsibility for law violation.
And the main problem: whether the proposed order does not correspond to the letter of the Constitution, but to democratic principles: the amendments are a set of norms and their blocks that are not interconnected.
Has this not violated the provision of the Federal Law “On the Procedure for Adopting and Entering into Force of Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation”, according to which interconnected amendments should be covered by one law on amendments to the Constitution (So in 2008, two blocks of amendments not related to each other were introduced two different bills).
'Used information from legal social network https://www.9111.ru'
So there is noise from all sides, idiotic advertising using NLP. The essence of the upcoming event is a vote of confidence in the authorities. Came, then trust.

[Ross xnumx]

Novel! You told correctly and there’s nothing to supplement. Opinions are expressed, pluses are placed ...
Nobody here alone says that the authorities turned the basic law into a footcloth, which can be turned over if she rubbed her foot or got wet, and voting on the constitution is a farce.
The most suspicious of all these movements is haste and absolute profanity. Here they are not even shy to say that voting does not solve anything ...
I do not want and I will not procrastinate ...

[Harry cuper]

Everything about the case, Roman, Respect

[mag nit]

They spoiled the Constitution with their amendments.

[Vladimir Glinsky]

Quote: Nikolai S.

Of course, sovereignty is not interesting. We give back $ 50 billion. Hodor, $ 500bn. for a plane shot down by Sumerians, what else they say and how much they say - and then Roman will have a good life.

But I would like less demagoguery. Her and so in the amendments above the limit norms.

[businessv]

When this is not the case, at least put everything into the Constitution, but if the government has not done this before, it will continue to do its own thing.

Thank you, Roman, great article! It can greatly help hesitant, or doubters!

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas.

I absolutely support!

[Radical]

Quote: Nikolay S.

Quote: Roman Skomorokhov

The state rewrites history using the ministries of culturelessness and the ministry of stupidity.

Of course, sovereignty is not interesting. We give back $ 50 billion. Hodor, $ 500bn. for a plane shot down by Sumerians, what else they say and how much they say - and then Roman will have a good life.
It became interesting about the lack of culture and stupidity. Whom did you define as a measure? Here is the Military Review site again! launched a series of articles at the same time about the wonderful king! Rus! (Orthodox!) Danilo Galitsky, simultaneously spitting on Alexander Nevsky. That, in general, there is no one who would know the history of that period, at least in the school volume, in order to see dill and Russophobia? Then you definitely need to be corrected.

Correct is how? To jail ? Or can you dig a moat for those who disagree? And why are you better off - and the Anglo-American propagandists?
Turbopatriot is a new name for people like you! And yet, in catch-up - the darling of your words is fascist!

[Usher]

The author of the article "analnenok" especially touches the words

there is a situation in which the appearance of at least some opposition

My question is, what is the benefit of the opposition?

[Region68]

All the rights and benefits that you now have, you have due to the fact that in history there were such people who are opposition-minded ..
One of the tears from the tree, another refused to eat the man, the third claimed that it was not the sun that was spinning around the earth, but, on the contrary, the fourth demanded an eight-hour working day. And so on

[Usher]

Quote: Region68

All the rights and benefits that you now have, you have due to the fact that in history there were such people who are opposition-minded ..
One of the tears from the tree, another refused to eat the man, the third claimed that it was not the sun that was spinning around the earth, but, on the contrary, the fourth demanded an eight-hour working day. And so on

Only TA opposition offered alternative and progress. And our "opposition" in the form of anal, horse and other bio-debris is a path to the abyss. And your example is correct when the dominant power or idea is flawed. Tell me, how do you live now compared to, for example, 96 or 98? There were many cars in your village, were there houses with siding? Have new buildings been built? Libraries, hospitals and schools? Even in a depressed region like Buryatia (my small homeland), they are building something. Although of course there is room for improvement. But progress in comparison with the 90s is obvious. And not thanks to the opposition.

[Region68]

And iPhones were not in '98, yes

[AU Ivanov.]

There were no iPhones anywhere in the world. But the cars were. So the comparison on iPhones is incorrect. With cars - quite for yourself.

[Region68]

You will overlay a graph of oil prices with a graph of economic growth in the Russian Federation and everything will be visible .. I remember Nemtsov in some interview said that he dreamed that oil was at $ 25 and it seemed like paradise would be in Russia at that price ..

[AU Ivanov.]

And you will remember when we introduced a budget rule, according to which hydrocarbon revenues finally went to the budget.

[Region68]

You learn to look not at the moment of time, but at the whole situation in development ... In the 70s and 80s there was no opposition and the general secretaries ruled the country from the hospital ward .. As a result, the country came to the railway station in the 90s .. And after the 90s, it spilled golden oil rain ...
Here you have siding and cars ..

[AU Ivanov.]

When was the budget rule introduced? Without it, the rain would not have poured, or rather poured, but not on us. And there would be no car, no siding. Regardless of hydrocarbon prices.

[Region68]

The budget rule because of the flooded rain appeared and not vice versa

[AU Ivanov.]

This means one thing - the correct use of petrodollars.

[Region68]

It just appeared what to use.

[AU Ivanov.]

You can use it in different ways. In this case, used correctly.

[bk0010]

Quote: Usher

And our "opposition" in the form of anal, horse and other bio-debris is a path to the abyss.

This is the opposition that is shown to you so that you hate it. "Opposition of His Majesty," so to speak. They won't tell you about other options on TV.

[Usher]

Quote: bk0010

Quote: Usher

And our "opposition" in the form of anal, horse and other bio-debris is a path to the abyss.

This is the opposition that is shown to you so that you hate it. "Opposition of His Majesty," so to speak. They won't tell you about other options on TV.

Well tell me? Maybe the "opposition" is the pseudo-communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation?

[Mazuta]

Not understanding, they asked an idiotic question, and now you are trying to justify yourself with the same idiotic examples.
What does siding and cars have to do with it? !!!
The person you wrote about the iPhone correctly ...
About the Internet, computers, remember ...

[Usher]

Quote: Mazuta

Not understanding, they asked an idiotic question, and now you are trying to justify yourself with the same idiotic examples.
What does siding and cars have to do with it? !!!
The person you wrote about the iPhone correctly ...
About the Internet, computers, remember ...

And despite the fact that in the 90s when ardent liberals were at the helm in the likeness of anal, there was nothing to eat. Did you eat rhubarb soup?

[depressant]

Usher colleague, your negative attitude towards such an institution as the opposition is dictated by the fact that you associate it with Navalny, whom you do not trust, you see him as a corrupt person, which means an enemy. I fully agree with you. Because just like you, in Navalny I see a corrupt person, it means an enemy whose goal is to take Putin's place. But not in order to borrow, in order to promote the development of the country better than Putin, but in order to realize our mercenary interests, finally put us under the control of the West and, possibly, ruin Russia.
On the other hand, the lack of criticism of the current government by ordinary citizens does not allow the authorities to get a real picture of their miscalculations. You will not argue that the decisions made by our government are always flawless? At least once in a lifetime, each of us is mistaken. And well-known political scientists and economic experts, cherishing their position, are either cautious or say what the authorities like ...
Therefore, in conditions when there is no at least one more political party in the country, equal in influence to the conditionally ruling United Russia party, - such a party that you and I could call oppositional means that it is subjecting the authorities to criticism on legal grounds - in such conditions, criticism of the actions and decisions of the authorities by the people acquires special value for the authorities and the president. After all, we are ordinary citizens, none of us claims the presidency, we are all sincere patriots of our country, therefore our criticism is disinterested, it is a manifestation of the sense of justice of our people and often points to the authorities' miscalculations much more accurately than those, who is supposed to do it by position. And, imagine, the president takes our criticism into account, he listens to it.
So what confused you in an article by Roman Skomorokhov? And I will tell you that. His statements seem surprisingly similar to the slogans of Navalny. So, it’s not Skomorokhov who resembles Navalny, but Navalny, living on the handouts of the West and practicing soldering, but not having his own ideology capable of attracting wide sections of the population, eagerly picks up the thoughts of people-statesmen - such as Roman, passing them off as their own. He is just a political plagiarist, a petty thief of other people's ideas. Roman Skomorokhov is a patriot. It’s very difficult to distinguish, is it? Let's try to do it. Let's learn to distinguish the one whose pocket is still not full of dollars and its owner is very bad from this, from the one whose heart hurts for the country.

[Usher]

The author of the article has purely liberal "howls". No constructivism. Only criticism and a desire to change. And for what? It's like destroying a house in which you live during a thunderstorm, out of what you don't like, and then trying to build a new one without the skills and money.

[Usher]

Simple criticism without real offers, REAL, and not just increase pensions and salaries (where to get the money from). This is just a selling nag.

[depressant]

Well then, obviously, you have constructive proposals. So spell it out! Otherwise, your dissatisfaction with Roman Skomorokhov also falls into the category of whining. You do not want to be considered a whiner? Remember that your personal construct, different from that of Skomorokhov, is not yet available on the site.
Moreover, your statement on the website, that is, in writing, that Skomorokhov is corrupt falls into the field of legal responsibility, as it contains an insult to the person. Yes, everyone who receives a salary can be considered "corrupt". People tend to sell their work, don't they? But you mean otherwise. You say that the content of Skomorokhov's articles contradicts his convictions, or there are no such convictions at all. But now, paid - wrote the required. For money - "What will you please?"
If Roman wrote an article in accordance with his beliefs, you insulted him. If you don’t have evidence that Roman has beliefs that are contrary to the content of the article, or that he doesn’t have any beliefs at all, you have insulted him.
You have no evidence!
It turns out that you insulted our Author, colleague. Not good! And it is completely unacceptable to put Roman Skomorokhov on a par with a person who has officially completed an internship at Yell University under the program of organizing coups d'état. I am referring to Navalny, whose team includes people who communicate this "coup d'etat specialist" with the West. For example, Milov. It is also worth mentioning the widely disseminated opinion, confirmed by some facts, that Navalny is Putin's creature, that with the hands of Navalny, through public "revelations", Putin keeps his sworn friends in check. It turns out that Navalny is provably a servant of two masters, Skomorokhov is not, but you, having drawn Skomorokhov to Navalny, and putting these people on the same level, pour “righteous anger” on one of them for some reason.

[Usher]

You confuse the effect and the cause. I did not write an article. The man undertook to criticize, I wrote to him, but what can you offer? I do not criticize such frankly liberal cries.

[depressant]

Colleague, we probably don’t understand each other. I propose to clarify the boundaries of our misunderstanding, as well as what we agree on in the following topics of the site. It seems to me that you are a worthy and serious person. It was nice to chat))

[samarin1969]

The novel in a very rigid framework described the powers of the President. Hinted at the monarchy. This is in vain. The Duma and the oligarchy have powerful powers. Some of them pass laws, others believe that they "contain" the state and the electorate. And then there are the siloviki, the bureaucratic class ... Putin himself somehow defined his nothing more than "representative functions." This is not Peter for you, who reared the boyars and the clergy. Moreover, elderly rulers rarely initiate "constitutional plebiscites" themselves.

Who really and why started all this ... constitutional reform, we are unlikely to know. And even the analytical abilities and insider of Roman Skomorokhov will not clarify anything for us.

[Uran53]

GDP and started. The question is just for what? My opinion: something serious is being conceived and the amendments will eliminate potential threats to power from the fifth column

[Karabin]

Quote: Uran53

amendments will eliminate potential threats to the government from the fifth column

And who is this 5 column?

[Uran53]

All those who do not agree with Putin's policy and have the opportunity to "correct" it

[Karabin]

A kind of definition. Then Brezhnev and his comrades were the fifth column "correcting" Khrushchev

[Uran53]

Well, actually yes

[depressant]

Roman missed something. The link "president - Federation Council - State Duma - government" should be supplemented by the Security Council. A quiet organization, invisible. As if she is not in the world. But it is not known what kind of monster dictating her own rules she can turn into after the vote.
By the way, Roman’s article appeared on the site at 15:00, and on my phone at 20:00. Not the first case.
And further. I would supplement the Constitution with a definition of the task of power.

The highest authority in the country is obliged to create such conditions in the form of laws that ensure full employment of the population.

And then what happens. The laws are such that small and medium-sized businesses eke out a miserable existence long before the era of the coronavirus. Only one survived who agreed to a corrupt course of action, that is, shared with whom it was necessary. And such, having survived, now aggressively attack everyone, defending zeroing. Even here on the topic. This is normal? But MiS provided a huge number of jobs. Now there is no.
And the oligarchs? How could the case be set up so that the oligarchs went offshore? How could a country be made so unattractive for large business? Some diggers, rocking chairs and pumps in the form of large enterprises are being built. Brains are leaking.
But a certain biological organization with a multi-billion dollar budget has been created, clearly planning to work within the framework of criminal eugenics. And articles have already appeared, they say, we will separate the lamb from the goats, they say, no stuffing. This bothers me especially.

[Mazuta]

Then include the State Council there ...
What is it and why no one knows, but you need to quickly nod to the TV ...

[depressant]

A colleague, about TV - is that me?))
Over the past year, I watched only the Victory Parade.

[pepel]

And where did the author see the new Constitution?

[Uran53]

How few all the same those who read the proposed amendments to the Constitution and even delved into their contents. I agree with Roman completely!

[BAI]

1.

Judges are appointed by Putin; judges are dismissed by Putin.

So this is probably good. How to remove such a judge from the Constitutional Court:

The Russian Federation does not continue in law, but replaces on its territory illegally created state which obliges her to reckon with the consequences of his activities, including political repression ”

- a certain K. Aranovsky judge of the Constitutional Court.
2.

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life.

Probably, the author himself deleted my comment the other day.

You compare your goal / desire with what candidates offer you (in this case, the Constitution), you evaluate their personal qualities (honesty, legal capacity, etc.) as well as the POSSIBILITY of REALIZING what you want, and if your comparison, evaluation and feasibility is positive, go vote for it, if you don’t like it, don’t go

And now, almost as well.

[grumbler]

If something needs to be written in the constitution, for example, How, When and How Restricted We Can Be in Our Civil Rights .
What quarantine showed perfectly was that everyone was forcibly quarantined.
Many of these were ruined by business and literally doomed to poverty.
Not "pestilence and ulcer", but the State with its draconian measures. Enterprises suffered colossal losses. And on what basis?

Doctors still cannot agree on whether such measures were needed or not.
Many virologists are already claiming that there was nothing out of the ordinary in this epidemic (no better, but worse than "bird flu" or "swine flu"). The mortality rate is lower. And not because of any "extraordinary measures", but just such a strain. But this time for some reason they staged this whole "apocalyptic circus".

But the main thing, as it turned out, is that the whole country can be placed under "house arrest" without even introducing a State of Emergency. It is enough to order - "everyone to sit" and sat down like a tsutsiki. And this is actually illegal - either introduce a full-fledged state of emergency or do not threaten with your finger.
But for some reason no "amendments" are provided for this.

I am silent about the guarantees of political representation and the right to real opposition. There are many good words in the Constitution, but which of them is fulfilled?
Do we have a normal political life? - Everything is fiction, except for the authoritarian irremovable regime. And this "popular vote" itself? - do not even stutter about the referendum, but as it was to Putin - "in three readings" at once.

In general, I will not go to this disgrace. The necessary numbers will be "drawn" even without me by those who are paid a good salary for this and who will receive medals "for an outstanding contribution to patriotism." And I do not intend to participate in this pornography.

[Valter1364]

I read and understand that in our country there are many reasonable and good people. And at the same time it becomes insulting why we are ruled by mediocrities, bandits, buggers and ignoramuses?

[depressant]

Colleague Valter 1364, mediocrity, bandits, buggers and ignoramus rule us for two reasons.
1. The smarter, the more decent a person is, the more he is inclined to weigh the pros and cons, pondering the motivation for his own future action. To do something or not to do something? Seeing the slightest sign of negative consequences, such a person refuses to act. Even if this action will benefit many. But if in the future there is at least one offended, decent person abandons the plan. In this regard, the subjects listed by you (mediocrity, etc.) do not think about the consequences at all. Seeing the benefit for themselves personally, they act. Depending on the level of egoism, confidence in their right, the skills of subjugating their own kind, they bring themselves to the level of government. They are impudent and ruthless.
2. The task of the country's leadership is to bring smart and decent to leading levels. And the negative consequences in the form of people who are offended by the activities of smart and decent, the country's leadership should take on themselves, compensating for the losses offended and thereby freeing the conscience of smart from torment. In any case, the activities of the smart and decent will be much less destructive and much more creative than the activities of the mediocrity of bandits, pederasts and the ignoramus.
But since the replacement of mediocrity, bandits, pederasts and ignoramus in leadership positions in our country takes place only at the level of statistical error, the conclusion is inevitable about what the highest political leadership of the country is in its moral character. It remains to not only guess, but also to see at a glance the destructive consequences for the country of such a selection of leading cadres. In practice, such a selection, as you recall, was called negative. The supreme power came to him from the assumption that mediocrity, bandits, buggers and ignoramuses would not attempt to encroach on it, which would be able to agree with them. Oh oh
In any case, the authorities have brought the situation in the country to the point that smart and decent, overpowering their own desire to avoid the negative consequences of their actions, can begin unification. And this process can turn out to be unpredictably instant. Just as a sequential increase in salt concentration does not lead to anything at first, and then when the solution reaches saturation, a precipitate precipitates sharply. Along the way, mediocrity, bandits, buggers and ignoramuses can unite among themselves. And then power will come under attack from two sides. It seems to me that something like this is happening now. The authorities are trying to defend themselves with self-isolation and digitalization, imposing it on us as a way of life.
Thus, the negative selection of personnel, which inevitably led to negative economic growth, does not add up to any of us.
History shows that no one won the war on two fronts.

[Valter1364]

I agree with the author of the article. Just turned off the loudspeakers with military marches and songs. Residential area, the rumble from the speakers all day. What for? My grandfather fought here on Malaya Zemlya. I sacredly honor the memory of those who died during the Second World War. But why should I listen to the rumbling from the loudspeakers under my windows all day !!! ??? Before that, for days to fly, I was forced to listen to instructions on wearing masks and observing the strict quarantine regime! Some associations are not good, from feature films about the fascists: "Go to the registration! Who goes to the registration, he will bury bread and butter! Who does not go to the registration, he will bury his leather Komsomol bill!" After the adoption of the amendments for eternal reign, will there be a decree on the mandatory wearing of St. George ribbons?

[Valter1364]

Those who put cons, let them install the speakers in their outhouse, and listen to the speeches of the leaders non stop! And I still have the right to choose what and when to listen to me!

[Camrad]

Here, in Sevastopol, people are lured into voting by quizzes. “As far as I know, seven cars are planned to be raffled off, several dozen mobile phones. I think this will be an additional good motivator that improves the mood these days - the quiz will last for all seven days, the results will be summed up daily. Among those who will answer correctly to the question whether these wonderful prizes will be drawn, "said M. Razvozhaev (Acting Governor).

[Valter1364]

This is a normal practice at events of this kind. In Novorossiysk, children were given tokens. You could buy all sorts of things with tokens. Information about this was disseminated in schools. The teachers told the children what a happy life they would have if they brought their parents to the polling stations. Adults were not given tokens. Like this! As in old Russian fairy tales: "Hut, hut! Stand in front of me, and back to the forest!"

[Harry cuper]

In Soviet times, various deficits were traded directly at polling stations. However, by 9 o’clock in the morning the goods ran out

[Karabin]

] First: Putin must rule another 16 years. Minimum.
Second: Putin must possess not just the fullness of power, but the imperial level.

This was what had to be amended, if it burns like this, and not cast a shadow on the wattle fence, considering their own people as idiots. At least that would be more honest.

[depressant]

A very correct observation. However, Putin cannot directly tell the people everything as it is. For example, to say that the adoption of a repressive pension reform is a consequence of pressure from the IMF, and therefore the US Federal Reserve. Thus, openly designating the country as a colony of the West. And although the overwhelming majority of voters do not delve into this kind of political and economic subtleties, but seeing "negative economic growth", people will sharply listen to the few who have understood. Therefore, Putin avoids such frank statements that consolidate the people not around him, but against him. For people will say: where have you been before, darling? And why should we trust you now? Moreover, along the way, they will turn their indignant glances towards the State Duma, the Federation Council and the government. And then the indignant glances from these structures will turn to Putin. In general, in disguise, he survives.

[Camrad]

Quote: Valter1364

This is normal practice at similar events.

One thing is not clear to me, the source of funding for these "enticements". Are fines for violations of self-isolation and quarantine?

[Valter1364]

In no way! This was invented a hundred years ago, at the beginning of the reign of the GDP. The loot from the coronavirus squats was spent strictly on the personal needs of the "collective farm chairmen".

Alternative

On the road from the city of Murom, next to the highway to Nizhny Novgorod there is a village called Penza. Opposite it are the summer residences built back in the USSR by the employees of MZ RIP JSC.

I’m going to the country. On the way I stop at the general store, buy a grandfather of beer and cigarettes.

There are no problems with beer, but there is a hitch with cigarettes. There are two packs in the window, "Parliament" and "Belomorkanal."

I ask: “Girl, dear, but is there any other alternative with tobacco?”

After a pause, the young lady becomes in the “hands on her hips” position and gives out: “We do not need an alternative on the collective farm. "Parliament" for the chairman, and all the other cigarettes smoke! "

[Harry cuper]

Good joke

[Valter1364]

This is not a joke. These are stories from my life. There is still: https://proza.ru/avtor/valter1364

[Harry cuper]

Jokes all of life come from https://proza.ru/avtor/valter1364 - закладку положил

[SARANCHA1976]

-We are doing well .. -What is this with you? -...Never mind...

[Wertgan]

These articles of the novel are interesting to collect in a selection. Interestingly, the cycle will still be continued after the referendum passes and the amendments are adopted?

[Valter1364]

Roman, the person is right! I talked with him for a while when they raised money for the Russian Donbass. It’s a pity, only that my prophecy came true, about one thousand nine hundred and the first humanitarian convoy!

[Harry cuper]

The amendments are ALREADY accepted. And the fact that the 1st will not be a referendum, but ... But this is not known. Nothing of this action is provided.

[alecsis69]

The amendments were adopted by the Duma, but not signed by the president. The president said he would sign only if the people vote.

[MBRSS]

I talked to a friend today. He: "and who if not Putin?" How everything started .............
I propose instead of Putin, Alexei Kurinnoy (Communist Party). Your suggestions?

[alecsis69]

And who is your chicken one? What did he lead in his life? What is his business experience, but in international politics?

[Alexey Z]

Quote: alecsis69

And who is your chicken one? What did he lead in his life? What is his business experience, but in international politics?

And who was Putin? Especially in business activities.

[alecsis69]

Putin led the FSB did not hear, such a small desk. As an assistant, Sobchak worked in a small provincial town - St. Petersburg, maybe you know? Then the chairman of the government, and yes, he was no one.

[Jünger]

Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life

A good life is promised not by the constitution, but by hard work, patience, discipline and undemanding. And when the author understands this, it will become easier to relate to any blizzard for which we are asked to vote periodically. And it’s better to understand it early.

[DPN]

correct article.

[I think logically ... occasionally]

Roman Skomorokhov: "Putin should have not just full power, but an imperial level. Why would he? I already said that it is not clear yet."

Roman, maybe I'm wrong, but for me the answer to this question is very clear. Putin wants to go down in history as a wonderful and wise reformer politician. And I would very much like to surpass Peter the Great himself. And so without fail in history textbooks about his wisdom and his wonderful deeds for the good of Russia it was mentioned many, many times. And that he was the best ruler in Russia. Is that not so? Of course it is! Any statesman would like that. But 20 years of the reign of Mr. Putin pass. In the country, economic stagnation / stagnation, corruption is blooming, the standard of living of people has been falling for several years in a row, and it seems that people have started to complain. Opposition (bastards and bastards like Platoshkin) calls for turmoil. The situation is terrible and for history textbooks it’s not good at all. Who's guilty? Well, of course not him, Putin. Guilty are those who do not implement his priceless decrees and sway prohibitively long. What to do in such a situation? Well, of course, bring your power to the imperial level and extend the term of government in the hope that it will even help. Uncle, because of his limited (just expressing his possibly wrong opinion) mental abilities, does not understand that these changes will not help him. At the same time, the people will become ever angrier and angrier as the standard of living continues to fall. Putin does not understand that the main problem of Russia is widespread corruption. Reforms in Russia are impossible without the destruction of corruption at least at the top. Dude does not understand that he is weak, and he can not do it. It's just that his character is not the same. You need to understand that the current Russian corrupt officials are the lads from the 90s. Today they have cultivated. That is, they will not use outright criminality against those who interfere with them. But the police will throw you drugs, or someone will make a call and you will lose your job, or you will just go to the cottage and disappear along the road. The only way to fight corruption is to use more cruel measures than those used by current corrupt officials. That is, to introduce the former Soviet firing squad for embezzlement on a particularly large scale. For lesser cases, plant, and put in cells to the mentally ill and maniac killers. I am sure that Peter the Great or Stalin would have fought corruption by such methods. We know they were cruel when necessary. Putin, however, due to his mentality that is inappropriate for his high rank and his gentle nature, will not do such measures. He can extend the term of his reign as long as he wants, he is not able to do anything good for Russia. He must leave, and the sooner, the better for Russia and for him - otherwise, in the textbooks on History, far from what he wants will be written about him.

[depressant]

Colleague, I support, excellent comment. In fact, arrests and landings are underway; we read about them almost daily in the press. But there is no system in them, according to which everything is jurisdictional. And if you check the entire vertical, then you need to plant the whole. Putin cannot destroy what his power rests on. Arrests and landings - only those who are a weak link in the vertical, are knocked out of it, violating its integrity. Corruption is vertical glue. Only a new person can break this system. But I am not sure what will happen. Indeed, even the Bolsheviks inherited from the tsarist government a huge bureaucratic apparatus, thoroughly corrupt. Bureaucracy is a carrier of corruption, and even considers itself immortal. Maybe because of this, Putin is in a hurry with digitalization, and the press is constantly reporting that many bureaucratic links will disappear. Hmmm ... Some will disappear, others will appear. The bureaucracy has an amazing ability to reproduce to the detriment of the reproduction of ordinary citizens and is therefore immortal.

[andrew42]

The fight against corruption must be conducted on the basis of an ideological assessment. If the ideology is bourgeois, then this is not corruption, but simply a successful business. But the guarantor has already said, as he snapped, at one time: "our ideology is patriotism!" Without new / old Socialist ideology, no execution articles for embezzlement in the OCR. will not help. Unfortunately. It will be just settling scores with persons unwanted by the authorities, as in China.

[bk0010]

It would be necessary to turn the central bank into a state bank and ban juvenile justice. As well as prohibiting deputies with impunity to prohibit and impose fines (at a minimum: the composition of the Duma that has banned is dissolved, the new composition is taking a decision) and ignore the constitution (laws that do not comply with the constitution are not enforceable, persons guilty of their adoption and execution are declared out law).

[sleeve]

So where are our moderators? Where is the fight against insulting the feelings of believers. The author calmly brought God into the little things. But in general ... Well, everyone reads what he wants. But how is this amendment about Putin a loan. But if you hadn’t brought it in. Excluded. How would they comment then? Same? Well, after all, for Russia, the mother’s soul is torn by the author and others like him. For example, I read that in Europe, socialism. In pensions and social programs at least. It is not written at whose expense the truth. In other nuances, the same thing ... In short, down with Putin and that's it. But the point is different - the growth of protest content on the network. But for what-another question. But it’s like in a joke with the British Encyclopedia. You are all fools there. Do not write to us anymore. Two references in the British Encyclopedia are ready.

[ZAV69]

Complete distortion

[Andrey VOV]

Roman, at which gas station, or what operator’s gas station raised the price of diesel fuel to 48 rubles and when? Please give an example

[Fing]

Quote: Andrey VOV

Roman, at which gas station, or what operator’s gas station raised the price of diesel fuel to 48 rubles and when? Please give an example

A striking example is "KalinaOil"

[Andrey VOV]

Kalina Oil is not an indicator, you must admit... one gas station on the M4, almost empty... besides, a pure trader... not an indicator..

[Fing]

Well, M4 is not an indicator; within the city of Voronezh there are about 20 of them + in the region
Lukoil 47,70 - which is also not far from 48

[Andrey VOV]

Taking into account the fact that the main beneficiary was imprisoned for 2 years and he paid a lot of money. We need to somehow compensate for the losses. That’s the price tag and today there are only 13 of them... but that’s not the point, God bless her

[Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich]

Quote: iouris

Personally, he "did not see". The market economy implies that the ability to work is sold at the market price. In other words, the capitalist buys the ability to work at the minimum price (this was discovered by K. Marx). If something doesn't suit you, find yourself another capitalist.

In order to counteract the greed of the capitalist and the lack of rights of the hired worker, trade unions exist in civilized countries. But in our country, their role/powers/rights, alas, are not great...

[novice]

The authorities must, and apparently will soon, understand that in the “West” no one needs them. At the first opportunity, they will take everything away from everyone. Only strengthening the sovereignty of one’s country can give some peace of mind for one’s “hard-earned” assets. If the country is gobbled up, then all the oligarchs will be fired quickly. They need to think about this. In their place will be their turn.......

[andrew42]

On every point I agree with the author. Clearly brought into the light of day all the vile guts of this pseudo-concern for the Russian people and near-constitutional farce.

[lopvlad]

“Yes, even today we have this minimal opportunity, once every six years there is an election show with voting according to the principle “and there is no one else for”, and the opportunity to snatch something from the locals who are eager to become deputies. A children’s playground, repairs to the entrance and etc.
And then it won’t exist in principle. Such a connection is formed as the president - the Federation Council - the State Duma - the government."

The amendment does not cancel the elections, but only provides an opportunity for Putin to stand as a candidate in these elections. Or does the author want to limit the people in choosing candidates for the post of head of Russia?


"Can a man from the street become a governor?"


But, for example, in any capitalist country, can a person from the street immediately become a governor, or should he still be a famous person who, after years of achieving recognition in his profession. Move from a public figure, the head of a district, to the mayor of a city, and only then to the governor?




"In addition, our native Constitution does not prescribe the procedure for registering political parties and the rules for holding elections. All this is determined by federal legislation. Everything would be fine, but who makes our laws? Yes, United Russia"

In our country, as in any other democratic country, laws are passed by the party that received the majority of votes in the elections. Whether it will be United Russia or another party is a completely different question.
For me, the main reason that Edro is gaining a majority in the elections is the political amorphousness of other Duma parties.
Who work only to get a percentage of the Duma and comfortably criticize the “party in power”.

“Elections based on the principle of “and there is no one else for” is a very convenient thing.”

This would be asked in a country of “ideal” democracy by those who voted for Roosevelt three times in a row and would have voted a fourth if he had not died.




“Literally two words about the courts. The courts (the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court) cease to be independent and independent. Judges are appointed by Putin, judges are dismissed by Putin.
By the way, ministers. Now they are of two categories. The first, important ones (ministers of security and economics), are appointed directly by the president
Do you see people here?"

I see perfectly well. The people elect the president and the president receives additional powers. Unlike, for example, the USA where the people vote for electors and they, in turn, can vote as they want.


“Yes, probably, the fact that pensions should be and should be indexed at least once a year is included in the Constitution is interesting. But nothing more, because there are zero specifics there.

Indexation of pensions “in the manner established by federal law” - that certainly sounds like it. How long? When? How? If all this is already in the law, then why shove it into the Constitution?”

pensions are specifically indexed to the percentage of inflation, and the Constitution should stipulate that instead of indexation, officials do not get away with the phrase “There is no money, but you are holding on”


“But if you look at Germany, Austria, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, there are no guarantees on paper. They have social services and pensions. They just exist.”

As the coronavirus has shown in Europe, even paid policies are reset during emergencies and citizens who seem to have personally paid for the possibility of treatment die at home without any help.


"Go to Dudu for details"

Maybe it’s better to go straight to Vika Nuland? After all, why do we need intermediaries in the form of Dudya?


“Although in gas station countries like the UAE or Qatar, everything is completely different...”

Will the author give us the system that exists in the UAE and Qatar, and maybe also give us the lines of their Constitution, if there is one at all, where the priority of international laws over domestic laws in these countries is indicated?



“When this is not the case, at least put everything in the Constitution, but if the government has not done this before, it will continue to mind its own business.”

an attempt to pretend to be naive?.
We all know that in Russia the laws are divided into
a) local (city, region, district)
b) republican (constitution in republics)
c) federal (operating within the federation)
d) Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The main law is the Constitution of the Russian Federation and everything that is written in it cannot be ignored by the judiciary in any, even the most remote, subject of the Russian Federation, unlike, for example, even federal ones.


"First: Putin must rule for another 16 years. Minimum."

show me the amendment where it is stated that Putin is appointed president for 16 years and presidential elections will not be held during this period?



“Personally, I did not see anything in the new Constitution that would promise me a good life. Alas.”

Probably the outlook depends on the presence of an inner citizen in each of us. There is this citizen and we look from the position of whether the life of people in the country and the country itself will improve, and if there is no citizen inside, then we look only from the position of improving personal well-being.

[Iris]

Your argument is somewhat subtly reminiscent of the performance of a dummy witness to a game of Thimble somewhere at the Kazansky station, who convinces those present that just now (even he can still be seen) a man won “big money” and bought himself a ticket for the next train to Crimea.
Such a comparison may perhaps seem inappropriate and even offensive, but in fact it is nothing more than a figurative metaphor for the current state of affairs.
In fact: is "Thimble" a gangster robbery? In no case ! It's a game. It has rules, control, and freedom of choice: the player can choose any glass out of three - freely, to his liking.
There's just no winning. And it cannot be - just like “improving the lives of people in the country and the country itself.” But what may be quite realistic is the accusation that there is no citizen inside, if, due to a misunderstanding, someone opens his mouth to say that improvements are not visible even under a microscope.

[evgeniy.plotnikov.2019mail.ru]

About God - this is obscene. It is disgusting, shameless, Roman, to classify the Creator of the Universe as a trifle. Yes, your whole word is in small letters. Just like in the “atheistic” USSR, really... How desperately brave you are, however! You write Putin with a capital letter, and your Creator with a small letter. Do you fear, honor, respect Putin more than God? What you are doing is called blasphemy, if SHO.
You seem to be interested in History... It is customary for Russians to honor the Savior. Or don't you know about it?
It was not your portrait, nor Putin’s, nor even Alexander I’s that our ancestors brought out for worship before the Battle of Borodino, but the Orthodox icon of the Queen of Heaven with the Child of God - the Smolensk Icon of the Mother of God. And Kutuzov, bending his knees, kissed his “miracle heroes.” After all, they had to go to French knife-like bayonets (about 50 cm long), and not type nonsense on the computer in a chair.
The amendment about the Creator is a decent amendment to the Basic Law. Another thing is that all these are half measures and “empty troubles.” Time has passed and now other steps are more important.
What's the point that Shoigu knows how to baptize his head before the Parade? At the foot of the Spasskaya Tower...And what's on the tower? The pentagram is a symbol of the Antichrist, if the ray is upward. Symbol of Satan, if the ray is down. Freemason and Satanist Bronstein (Trotsky) brought this rubbish to the Red Army and the RSFSR in his time. No “amendments” will help either V.V. Putin personally, or his “marketers”, or the state of “Russia Capitalist”,（,,RK,）, unless the COURSE of this “educational” changes radically , quasi-states. No “amendments” will DEFINITELY help!
I'm terribly sorry for the LOST TIME. Lost on stupid things like building palaces, buying watches, showing off, worthless and expensive mass events, elections and re-elections and their falsification..
The authorities or the people can, Roman, rub in the glasses. With God this number will not work! We are in full view before Him.
What can one say about the stupid homo sapiens, that about the stupid state - “not a candle to God, not a poker to the devil.” It’s a shame, but that’s exactly what the Republic of Kazakhstan is at the moment. And it’s a leap year... And Putin’s team, like “sleeping on the move,” and “sleeping.” They say exactly: “Whoever God wants to punish, he deprives of reason.”
You are a good author, Roman, but it’s more important to be a good person. A good person is always with God. By. there is no other way. Either you are with the Creator, or you are with a hydrogen sulfide pompous idiot （see. a statue of Baphomet, real or ennobled, in a famous church）. Choose Good! There are enough two-legged piglets without you. Their path is known

[Evgeny Martynov]

Russia can only exist as an empire. So there must be an emperor. Previously it was the Secretary General, today it is the President. In general, it doesn’t matter what you title. The fact is important. The difficult experience of social experiments confirms this. This is just the beginning. Everything necessary for the reformation of society will subsequently be provided...including changes to the constitution.

[starshina78]

For me personally, this Constitution is simply a fiction that exists, but is not implemented. And even if the Guarantor comes up with at least three hundred amendments, there will still be no main one that would put everything in its place - the power of the people, and not the President and others like him. I will either not vote for the amendments, or I will vote “against”. I, as a working pensioner, was put “below the plinth”. Yes, and nothing depends on me or anyone else. The authorities will draw as much as necessary.

[lopvlad]

Quote: starshina78

there will still be no main thing that would put everything in its place - the power of the people, and not the President and others like him

Well, it was necessary to defend the USSR in 1991 and organize rallies and protests against the 1993 constitution. After all, you were an adult then.

otherwise it’s easy to pretend that

Yes, and nothing depends on me or anyone else. The authorities will draw as much as necessary.

and go with the flow without resisting but at the same time cursing the authorities.

[alecsis69]

It was necessary to spell out in the constitution - everything to protect the interests of Roman Skomorokhov! Then there would be a decent constitution.
And so the summary of the article is that everything is bad, so nothing needs to be changed.
Well, there’s just a little bit of lies about the amendments crammed in everywhere, so there’s no point in even analyzing it, to analyze it you need to write a whole article, and the volume is three times larger than this one.

[Aleks2000]

It will, it won't...
The main thing there will be lifelong power and irresponsibility.

And the traces of twisting/twisting the votes of those voting through State Services are already being discussed online.

“Do you see the gopher? No? Neither do I. But there is one.”

[Pavel57]

The next one after GDP will adopt new amendments.

Voting on each amendment would be more correct and technically simpler. But the authorities don’t need this.

I don’t like the point about historical truth - it was different in our history and changed depending on the political situation.

But in any case, the departure of GDP will cause turmoil, not now in 10 years.

[Iris]

Thanks to the author for his brief and informative coverage of the issue.

[Brigadier]

The author is absolutely right.

All this bacchanalia with Putin’s “amendments”, most of which are absolutely unnecessary, because... is already spelled out in the relevant laws, but some were not included in the “amendments” because rich creatures may not like the fact that they are deprived of their real estate over the hill, where they can go if something happens... and taken in high-speed mode, made only for one, most important, “amendment”, for the sake of which all this was started.
Is not it, "Mr" Putin?

As they say, rescuing a drowning person is the work of the drowning person himself! What we see...
Is not it, "Mr" Putin?

Personally, I have already “voted” early. And voted "AGAINST"!!!
Although I understand perfectly well what the result will be...
Is not it, "Mr" Putin?

[NordUral]

Solidarity, Brigadier! Although I’ll personally go to the station and tell my story NO!
Although, with 31 million absentee voters today, this will only be an expression of protest against the criminal gang in power.

[petrol cutter]

It's too late to write manuals. And spread your thoughts throughout the tree.
NW "More" has already taken part in early voting.
Me personally too.

[NordUral]

Exactly! There are 31 “voted” of you and all sorts of them.
Although there are some who voted, a certain number, I don’t argue, but not 31 lemons of hyperactive and timid citizens who are afraid to go to the polling station.

[Thomas the Unbelieving]

Funny. In order to figure out where our money is and why we remain silent when they spit in our faces, we don’t need any complications or long tables. Let's try to understand the situation using just 6 figures published by the Central Bank. To do this, let’s draw up a tiny balance of the country’s money supply as of January 1.1.2020, XNUMX, in trillions of rubles:
All money in Russia consists of three aggregates that form the money supply in the national definition:
1. Cash (CB tickets issued) -9.7
2. Settlement and current accounts for cashless payments 14.2
3. Money in fixed deposits (savings of the population and enterprises) - 27,8
Total money supply in the national definition - 51,7
These are the obligations of the country's banking system to its customers. Now let's see where our money is, for what purposes the banks used our money on their own behalf. There are only three such uses for this money:
1. Monetary gold, which is a guarantee of banking obligations in case of emergency-7,2
2. Internal credit, ie liabilities of banks to the state, enterprises and the population -57,7
3. Credit granted to foreign capital and governments - 39,6
Total amount of money used by banks in the country - 104,5
It turns out interesting: banks use an amount of 104,5 trillion rubles, but only 51.7 trillion have been issued into the country. So where is the difference, 41.2 trillion rubles, which is 80% (more precisely, 79.8%) of all the country’s money? According to the rules of banking, a bank can issue a loan only within the limits of the funds it has (and minus the reserve standards established by the Central Bank). It looks like in the film “Aibolit-66”: “normal heroes always take a detour.”
To answer this question, it’s enough to look at the balance sheet of an organization called the Central Bank, and in fact, in terms of banking, it plays the role of a vacuum cleaner pumping money out of the country. Let's see his annual report, submitted on May 20 to the State Duma and caused genuine enthusiasm among his receivers.
According to the balance sheet as of December 31.12.2019, XNUMX, the Central Bank had in the country, Russia, the following monetary obligations (rounded):
1. Cash in circulation - 10.6 trillion.
2. Funds of the Government of the Russian Federation - 10.7 trillion.
3. Funds of credit institutions (ours): -4.2 trillion.
4. Securities -1.9 trillion.
Total 28 trillion.
Let's see how he used them.
1. Precious metals-6.9 trillion.
2 Funds placed with non-residents and securities of foreign issuers-25.3 trillion.
3. Securities of the government and banks of the Russian Federation - 1.1 trillion.
Total 30.5
Not all balance items are indicated, but it is also clear that the Central Bank operates as a foreign bank in our country, using the funds of Russia to lend to foreign capital and foreign states, which are mostly hostile (according to our authorities), but make good use of our resources.
The result of these efforts: return on investment (in %%) - dollar - 1, euro - 0.4, yuan - 3.05, yen - 0.04. And the final stunning result for the Central Bank of any country is a loss over the last two years of 617.2 billion rubles. with personnel costs of 118 billion rubles.

[NordUral]

We discuss everything, talk and write, but these by mid-day on June 27th I had already voted (31) 000 000 citizens of the Russian Federation. I accidentally heard it on ORT while having tea. That's how it is, gentlemen and comrades. I don’t know if this is a clinic of power or an arrogant conviction of our stupidity and submissiveness.

[Thomas the Unbelieving]

Why are “analysts” always wrong when it comes to people’s actions? Some people don’t like “voting”, others don’t like “nullification”. In fact, we are again seeing the next action of our great drama, which began in June 1941. We have, at the instigation of one scumbag, who during the war failed an operation near Kharkov and only thanks to the benevolence of the Supreme Commander remained alive. But he later declared it a failure in 1941. In fact, on June 10, 1941, at an extended meeting of the Politburo, Stalin began his speech with a statement about the imminent war. Then there was Zhukov’s report on preparations for military action. But I remember even during the war, our historian, a retired captain of the Russian Imperial Army, explained to the young cadets the defeat of the Red Army at the beginning of the war in absolutely clear terms. The point is not surprise, but the enormous numerical superiority of a well-armed and experienced enemy. We had no experience of mass military operations. Spain and Khalkin-Gol, that's all.
Therefore, during the war, 27 million were not just destroyed. The bravest, most devoted and ideological fighters died. In 1946, at a meeting with the creative intelligentsia, Stalin said: “And humanity was saved by ordinary Soviet people who, without noise or fuss, in the most difficult conditions, carried out industrialization, carried out collectivization, radically strengthened the country’s defense capability and, at the cost of their lives, led by the communists, defeated the enemy. After all, in the first six months of the war alone, more than 500 thousand communists died on the fronts in battle, and in total during the war - more than three million. These were the best of us, noble and crystal clear, selfless and selfless fighters for socialism, for the happiness of the people. We miss them now... If they were alive, many of our current difficulties would already be behind us.”
Unfortunately, after the coup of 1954-1957, changemakers became the head of the party, who deprived the state power of the country of its real powers. The so-called “nomenklatura”, which later became “democrats”, and after the collapse of the USSR became “liberals” and “elite”. It is clear that this public, which despised the oath they had taken, gladly snatched up the wealth of our country and rushed en masse to the countries of the “golden billion,” realizing that the people they had betrayed would never forgive what they had done without the right of limitation. But in the West, this public, which bought the rights but did not buy how to drive, was also tolerated for a long time.
Putin gave them the fattest pieces of the economy and undertook to preserve what they had done. But since 2014, everything has gone wrong, and by the beginning of this year, the failure of many initiatives is visible. And then it became clear that for these people, worried only about themselves, there is no feeling of gratitude, no responsibility for their actions. With the “vertical of power” there is no diligence, no gratitude, these people have no mutual love.
Therefore, there are many, many amendments and powers. But the matter failed; it is known that a lot of things can be written on a barn.
And the situation is very serious. The theory of ethnology, proven by our great scientist L. N. Gumilyov (1912-1992), is justified. We are now in the penultimate phase of ethnogenesis—memorial. Her imperative: “Let’s remember how wonderful it was.” In the book “Woe from Illusions,” published in the last year of his life, 1992, he clearly warned that the course towards Europe would end badly for Russia. The next, final phase of the existence of an ethnos is degeneration. Her imperative: “We don’t need anything.” Everything is like in the old romance “peoples, their customs and fashions pass.” Gumilyov, in his brilliant book “The End and the Beginning Again,” perfectly shows the fate of many peoples that disappeared in historical time. But he also showed a possible way out when people appear in an ethnic group whose imperative becomes “We must fix the world, because it is bad.”