Military Review

Former US State Department adviser: Trump must stop pushing Putin into China's arms

79

Trump must realize that the main opponent of the United States is not Russia, but China. Therefore, it is pointless to continue to put pressure on Moscow with sanctions, especially since it is primarily beneficial to Beijing.


So in his article published by the National Interest publication, Christian Wheaton, a former senior adviser to the United States Department of State during the reign of George W. Bush and Donald Trump, argues.

According to Wheaton, US sanctions against Russia are meaningless. When they were introduced six years ago, the goal was the reintegration of Crimea and Donbass into Ukraine. But to date, these territories have not only not begun to draw closer to Ukraine, but have finally moved away from it. Not the last role in this was played by the aggressive policy of Kiev.

In addition, sanctions harm America more than Russia, because China turned out to be the main beneficiary, and Washington is forcing Moscow to draw closer to it. In the United States, they must realize this and stop doing harm to themselves.

Putin has repeatedly demonstrated his position. It is not difficult to understand his message that the resolution of conflicts and disagreements anywhere in the world most easily occurs through dialogue between the largest world powers.

America should have long recognized that China is its main geopolitical competitor. Of course, Christian Wheaton does not think that Russia will become an ally of the United States in the fight against Beijing, but he hopes that Moscow can be persuaded to remain neutral:

The goal of the interaction should not be a grand breakthrough, but simply a reasonable hope that Russia will have some kind of incentive to remain neutral and not help our opponents.
Photos used:
www.kremlin.ru
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 23 June 2020 09: 34
    +2
    Former US State Department adviser: Trump must stop pushing Putin into China's arms
    fool The Senate pushes sanctions.
    sanctions do more harm to America than Russia, because China turned out to be the main beneficiary, and Washington is forcing Moscow to draw closer to it.
    Who is arguing? Just the United States does not take into account the interests of others.
    China gets a reliable rear.
    1. WILL
      WILL 23 June 2020 09: 41
      +7
      It seems that the Brain begins to work for the Mattress managers - Only after the Resignation! request
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      fool The Senate pushes sanctions.

      Republicans in the Senate - Most. Trump is a Republican.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 23 June 2020 10: 10
        0
        Quote: ANIMAL
        It seems that the Brain begins to work for the Mattress managers - Only after the Resignation!

        If the brains of the mattress toppers did not fall into a coma after September 3, 1945, but continued to work, then their retired managers (and acting) would not have to scratch the back of the head with one hand and the lower back with the other.
      2. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 23 June 2020 11: 43
        -1
        Quote: ANIMAL
        Republicans in the Senate - Most. Trump - Republican

        And sho? Trump does not have a majority in Republicans.
    2. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 23 June 2020 09: 44
      +4
      Former US State Department adviser: Trump must stop pushing Putin into China's arms

      Trump seems to live by the principle: "The less a woman we love, the more she likes us!" The ex-adviser to the State Department is right: this does not work with Russia!
      1. mikh-korsakov
        mikh-korsakov 23 June 2020 12: 41
        +3
        An interesting pattern in America. As soon as an official resigns, he immediately becomes a defender of Russia's interests. What is it for?
        1. paco.soto
          paco.soto 23 June 2020 14: 23
          0
          immediately becomes a defender of Russia's interests. Why would it be? ©
          Probably the success of the work of the Russian intelligence departments ?!
    3. SS-18
      SS-18 23 June 2020 09: 59
      11
      "America should long ago realize that China is its main geopolitical rival. Of course, Christian Wheaton does not think that Russia will become an ally of the United States in the fight against Beijing, but he hopes that Moscow can be persuaded to remain neutral:"

      -Christian Wheaton is a competent person, with a sober analytical mind!
      1. dauria
        dauria 23 June 2020 11: 50
        +2
        -Christian Wheaton is a competent person, with a sober analytical mind!

        Well, "Equality on the Mainland" wasn't invented by him. And the British, and for a long time. They helped the Germans or the French, depending on who was weaker.
        So the Americans - raised China against the USSR, but went too far with the dosage. It’s too early to help Russia, and to no avail. Hindus need to be grown, even if their nuclear weapons and missiles are brought to the level of unacceptable damage to China.
        In a word, Americans are stuck. Like the British, they raised Hitler as opposed to France, and she took and raised her paws. And I had to shoot the French fleet! sit behind a puddle and wait for Hitler to turn his neck.
    4. NDR-791
      NDR-791 23 June 2020 11: 41
      +2
      Who is arguing? Just the United States does not take into account the interests of others.
      China gets a reliable rear.

      However, the Chinese themselves sacredly observe American sanctions. What do you want? Ahh ... block the work of Sberbank in China? You're welcome!!! And we will still be a reliable rear. My friend died due to this lock. I traded with China and used to travel with a card, and after this nice decision I had to go with cash. The result is sad.
    5. bayard
      bayard 23 June 2020 21: 03
      0
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Just the United States does not take into account the interests of others.

      Now American interests in the neutrality of Russia in their showdown with China.
      It will cost .
      And a lot.
      And now, if the ugliness ends and they no longer interfere with the solution of Russian issues ... I would love to stand in a neutral position to watch the Yankees and Chinese fight with interest.
      With great pleasure . yes
      And with pleasure I would repay the Chinese with the same coin that they have paid us since 2014.
      For blocked and closed accounts of Russian companies and firms in China, for blocked credit cards, for a ban on the supply of critical components and components, for a ban on our banks from financing our business (after the departure of Western banks), after the delivery of unusable engines for our ships .. . for technology theft.
      And at the same time, Russia will have the opportunity to make very good money (while maintaining a neutral status) on trade with the same "friendly" China.

      But if the US politicum does not hear this good advice from this person, then kirdyk will come to their country. Complete and final. For they have made enemies ... a lot.
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 24 June 2020 05: 59
        0
        Quote: bayard
        It will cost . And a lot.
        negative Rome does not pay to traitors. repeat
        Yes, and we do not need their sticky pieces of paper. angry
        1. bayard
          bayard 24 June 2020 06: 57
          0
          But am I talking about money? bully I mean that the States will have to leave the clearing of Russian interests. Cancel at least part of the sanctions, stop hostile actions and not prevent us from making the ruble a reserve currency ("nationalization of the Central Bank" or its abolition and establishment, as it should be for a sovereign state, the State Treasury and the State Bank of Russia).
          And with smaller offers it is better not to come to us. smile
          And "Rome" is no longer Rome, but Carthage, which, as you know, must be destroyed.
          It is destroyed.
          Like a former Rome.
          Barbarians. lol

          If it does not even burn out in a civil war, it will come out of the crisis weak and sick.
          But if it comes out and wants our neutrality, then we will have to give us everything that we have taken over (I, again, not about money), and pay on top.

          The order in the world is changing radically.
          bully
          1. Mavrikiy
            Mavrikiy 24 June 2020 09: 34
            -1
            Quote: bayard
            I mean that the States will have to leave the glade of Russian interests. Cancel at least part of the sanctions, stop hostile actions and not stop us from making the ruble a reserve currency

            Let them remain in our glade of interests, the longer they remain, the deeper the pit where they crash. Waste of resources (I'm not talking about money). Let the sanctions remain, they can still add (the sinner to hell with hell: Have you forgotten how to work at all? It's cold!) The Italians were the first to yell for lifting the sanctions, Germany, France ..... Mayonnaise will soon result from the monolithic, solid EU as a result of sanctions. While with the US at the table, they will promise everything and stop hostile actionsand the eyes are blue-blue ....
            do not stop us from making the ruble a reserve currency And who is stopping, the full nationalization of the monetary system and forth ...
            Look back less and do business.
            1. bayard
              bayard 24 June 2020 09: 55
              0
              I am now listening to the chronicle from the USA ... and it seems to me that soon there will be no one to agree with.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 23 June 2020 09: 35
    +3
    Therefore continue and further pressure on Moscow with sanctions is pointless, especially since it is primarily beneficial to Beijing.
    However, a mature thought occurred to the mericatos!
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 23 June 2020 11: 37
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      However, a mature thought occurred to the mericatos!

      The Chinese, as always, do not trynit a lot, but silently watch.
  3. Terenin
    Terenin 23 June 2020 09: 35
    +3
    So Christian Wheaton argues, former Senior Advisor to the United States Department of State during the reign of George W. Bush and Donald Trump.
    Another confirmation that the days of real politicians in power with an analytical mindset have passed in the USA.
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 23 June 2020 09: 50
      +5
      Quote: Terenin
      So Christian Wheaton argues, former Senior Advisor to the United States Department of State during the reign of George W. Bush and Donald Trump.
      Another confirmation that the days of real politicians in power with an analytical mindset have passed in the USA.

      In a year, this is the second American politician to promote the idea that excessive pressure on the Kremlin leads to a stronger alliance between Beijing and Moscow, which is fraught with Washington. Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was the first to talk about this "problem" six months ago, saying that the United States should strive to ensure that - "Relations between Washington and Beijing, relations between Washington and Moscow, should become better than relations between Beijing and Moscow. ". But along the way, the mattresses were late with this thought, since both Beijing and Moscow have already realized that through joint efforts they can debunk the "hegemon" and deprive him of the privilege of dictating to the whole world how to conduct business.
      1. Terenin
        Terenin 23 June 2020 09: 54
        +2
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        But along the way, the mattresses were late with this thought,

        This is so, but ... it will not always be like this, we must not lose time
  4. Woodman
    Woodman 23 June 2020 09: 38
    +2
    In addition, sanctions harm America more than Russia
    What a twist...
    Of course, Christian Wheaton does not think that Russia will become an ally of the United States in the fight against Beijing, but he hopes that Moscow can be persuaded to remain neutral:
    However, it is sensible to talk like this ... I thought it was no longer fashionable in the West. One sadness - the ability to sanity is manifested exclusively in the "former".
    reasons Christian Wheaton, a former senior adviser to the United States Department of State during the reign of George W. Bush and Donald Trump.
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 23 June 2020 09: 41
    0
    Ex-Advisor to the US State Department:

    Ex advisers, generals, officials begin to think ... or are bought cheaper!
    That does not believe in common sense and good intentions!
  6. AU Ivanov.
    AU Ivanov. 23 June 2020 09: 48
    +4
    The most interesting thing is that for Russia the main opponent in the future is not the United States, but China. USA overseas, China at our side. The USA is predictable, China is not. The Chinese dragon is still young, has not yet gained strength. When he grows up, we will sit with the States in the same trench.
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 23 June 2020 09: 59
      +3
      China will not be allowed to swear. One in the China field will not stand .. If you imagine that China will be sanctioned, something like that that has been imposed on Russia, then a krendan may come to the economy ... To employ so many people who have lost their jobs at once, export work is a blow ! Another thing is interesting, Chinese news agencies increasingly praise Russia, give flattering assessments to the weapons of Russia and so on, even hope for Russia's help in the process of returning Chinese gold from the United States, and its 600tn there. ! It seems that both the US and China are starting a fight for Russia ... It’s even interesting who can offer anything ...
    2. Soviet Union
      Soviet Union 23 June 2020 11: 11
      -1
      Nonsense.
      Take a look at the thousand-year history of China .... cows do not sing blood (something like that).
      And in the same trench with America (country) we can find ourselves ... to hold our throats (to choke .. not to choke .. separate conversation).
      1. AU Ivanov.
        AU Ivanov. 23 June 2020 11: 18
        +1
        China is not a cow, China is a boa constrictor. It will choke slowly but surely. And it is China that in the foreseeable future will be the world hegemon, squeezing America. And the conditions that he will dictate to the whole world are unlikely to be better than the current, state, given Chinese nationalism.
      2. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 24 June 2020 13: 05
        0
        Quote: Soviet Union
        Cows do not sing blood (something like that).

        How how? repeat
        1. Soviet Union
          Soviet Union 24 June 2020 18: 45
          0
          This is too complicated for you.
          1. Mavrikiy
            Mavrikiy 24 June 2020 21: 11
            0
            Quote: Soviet Union
            This is too complicated for you.

            That's for sure. Cows singing blood .... Dali? USE, Russian at 5? repeat
            1. Soviet Union
              Soviet Union 24 June 2020 23: 55
              0
              The creator of T9 has died .....
              Land him a down jacket
              Wash your beer.
              1. Mavrikiy
                Mavrikiy 25 June 2020 06: 28
                0
                Quote: Soviet Union
                Wash your beer.

                Looks like a drowned man in beer. Such an avatar fucked up ....fool
                1. Soviet Union
                  Soviet Union 25 June 2020 20: 45
                  0
                  Ssssk ... the country needs heroes ..
                  Looking at you, fools are born.
    3. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 23 June 2020 12: 41
      +2
      "we sit with the States in the same trench." ///
      ----
      I think so too.
      Something like Lend-Liz-2 will be, one way, then the other.
  7. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 23 June 2020 10: 07
    -1
    Clever thoughts come after the resignation, they have such a job. Most likely oil and gas companies paid some money to this Wheaton. Lobbyism is called. They also do not have former ones. If China and Russia continue in the same vein, an explosive mixture for the USA is obtained. CHINA against RUSSIA is not in this life. China has spouted all coastal Africa, has taken control of the mining industry, and has never shot at that. Osel does his job with gold.
  8. unhappy
    unhappy 23 June 2020 10: 40
    +4
    They often repeat that Russia has two allies, an army and a navy.
    By analogy - America has no friends, or enemies or licking. request
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 23 June 2020 12: 48
      0
      Here you are wrong. America has NATO and the British Commonwealth. Three dozen industrialized countries of the world, with all resources (Canada, Australia), distributed across all oceans. Not everyone will send troops to fight for America, but they will provide resources and industry for military needs.
      In this regard, the situation of China is worse.
      1. unhappy
        unhappy 24 June 2020 09: 33
        0
        Alternatively, the Anglo-Saxons are basically those who hold on to the remnants of the former power and greatness in fear of the future. Those who were among the "golden billion" and see that the world is not changing in their favor.
        "The foreign countries will help us" and subserviently assent to the United States, only America is not the same, it recently had liquid diarrhea, the population became impoverished and rebelled.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 24 June 2020 09: 56
          +1
          It can be done in another way. China is developing rapidly, getting richer and getting stronger. He is on his way to the "golden billion" (then it will no longer be a billion, but 2.5 billion).
          Naturally, the US - the current leader - is alarmed by the military and economic strengthening of China. A country of a special eastern type, which the USA, Russia, and Europe are alien alike (all are white barbarians smile )
          1. unhappy
            unhappy 24 June 2020 10: 01
            0
            For the United States, all independent and proud people are equally alien.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 24 June 2020 10: 15
              +2
              There are 1.5 billion of these "independent and proud" people in China. And now with a huge army (every year they launch many more new ships than the WHOLE Russian navy) and a powerful economy.
              And the Chinese - the problem for Russia is the same as for the USA. Even more - America does not have a common border with China.
              1. unhappy
                unhappy 24 June 2020 10: 24
                -2
                The Chinese fleet is not our problem, our economy is "land-based". The Chinese economy is a consumer (buyer) of our resources. There are no territorial claims. China is against America and needs at least a neutral Russia.
                Do not scare us with our neighbor and do not try to drive a wedge between our countries.
                1. voyaka uh
                  voyaka uh 24 June 2020 10: 40
                  +1
                  The United States also has no territorial claims against Russia. US resources in bulk. There is almost no trade with Russia.
                  The ideology is the same: money, capitalism. laughing
                  1. unhappy
                    unhappy 24 June 2020 12: 29
                    0
                    The United States has no complaints about Russia. belay
                    A day later, one can hear from the State Department - "Russia must ...". And you have not heard about the sanctions.
                    The ideology of America is known - a weakened, isolated Russia. And money is not the main thing.
                    1. 3danimal
                      3danimal 24 June 2020 17: 03
                      +1
                      Where does this “ideology” sound, what is it for them? And what do you mean by weakness - the implementation of international treaties, the refusal to revise borders?
                      1. unhappy
                        unhappy 25 June 2020 11: 03
                        0
                        Where does this ideology sound? You are definitely out of the woods!
                        Google to help you - a white or blue or a different color book, which is published by official US authorities. It says very clearly that they consider Russia to be their enemy. Take off your pink glasses and see the reality.
                        As for the fulfillment of the treaties, this is towards the United States, as they assert themselves with an ABM treaty. Or how they promised to protect the Kurds ...
                      2. 3danimal
                        3danimal 26 June 2020 03: 19
                        0
                        Was an international treaty concluded with the Kurds?
                        About the blue book: how many years have we shouted from each (state) iron that America is an enemy and we are dusting it (silent, then we are dusting too). They noticed us, the goal has been achieved.
                      3. unhappy
                        unhappy 26 June 2020 09: 06
                        0
                        Who are the Kurds, pooh on them. The gentleman gave the floor, then took it back, then business.
                        Kurds do not, they started to bull by receiving oral guarantees from you know who.
                        The gentleman is not ashamed.
                        I don’t look at the State Council for a long time, I can find information, I can think.
                        I don’t see the connection between the blue book and the screams, there are also enough screams beyond the hillock - this kind of work is demonized.
                        If you do not understand - the blue book is a reality, they (the US state) consider us their adversaries, they have developed appropriate plans at their headquarters. But unlike countries that do not have Strategic Rocket Forces, we know that they will remain plans and fantasies.
                        Do you not like reality? There was no justice and equality, no, and never will be. Grow up.
                      4. 3danimal
                        3danimal 26 June 2020 12: 37
                        0
                        Too much neglect.
                        Cartoons with shelling of Virginia, the introduction of medium-range missiles (which supposedly is not). Many concrete actions have been done (except for PR) to attract attention.
                      5. unhappy
                        unhappy 27 June 2020 10: 35
                        0
                        That's it! We just wanted to draw attention to ourselves and therefore built nuclear submarines, created intercontinental missiles and other weapons.
                        Speaking through the lip is not what we do, the Anglo-Saxons do it all the time.
        2. 3danimal
          3danimal 24 June 2020 12: 04
          0
          You want to say that in the 2nd half of the 20th century there were no military operations with China due to territorial disputes ??
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. unhappy
      unhappy 24 June 2020 12: 36
      -1
      Maybe you came out of the forest, the news is that the territorial disputes between the countries have been resolved, an agreement has been signed (peace is chewing gum friendship). Maybe you are not in the forest, but in the basement, the diagnosis of sociopathy about you was also hidden.
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 24 June 2020 17: 01
        +1
        Agreements were also signed with the Nazis.
        A number of Chinese officials say unambiguous things (and even Mao began) about the unjustly “depressed” south of the Far East. Which from time immemorial was Chinese.
  • Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 24 June 2020 13: 07
    0
    Quote: unhappy
    By analogy - America has no friends, or enemies or licking.

    Do they know that? More precisely, they are complex from this?
    Everything needs to be taken for granted and work with it. request
  • janin
    janin 23 June 2020 10: 45
    +9
    so don't push !! or in spite of the conductor? 7
  • Junior Private
    Junior Private 23 June 2020 10: 50
    0
    In hindsight, everyone is strong. Only the adviser forgot to say that America lives off robbery. Sanctions are one of its types.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 25 June 2020 10: 39
      0
      Can you expand on the budget items of the United States, what income comes from robbery?
      1. Junior Private
        Junior Private 25 June 2020 11: 52
        0
        Fed activity, export of democracy ...
        1. 3danimal
          3danimal 26 June 2020 03: 21
          0
          Too general. The world's largest volume of arms sold, revenues from film production, IT companies, the same Apple (taxes)?
          1. Junior Private
            Junior Private 26 June 2020 12: 46
            0
            All of the above, and much more, is traded for dollars, which the Fed prints uncontrollably and in any quantities (!). Robbery.
            1. 3danimal
              3danimal 26 June 2020 12: 51
              0
              You can not buy.
              High-tech products are produced. Do you have an Intel or AMD processor in your PC? Uncle Sam didn’t stand with the barrel at the box office?
              1. Junior Private
                Junior Private 26 June 2020 12: 55
                0
                Means of payment - dollars. With the basics of the economy, how are you?
                1. 3danimal
                  3danimal 26 June 2020 12: 58
                  0
                  Suggest an alternative? It is possible for euros, pounds. You can produce your own, only it will be more expensive and of worse quality.
                  Can you scientifically substantiate your version?
                  1. Junior Private
                    Junior Private 26 June 2020 13: 41
                    0
                    I substantiated the American robbery. I did not put forward any "versions".
                    1. 3danimal
                      3danimal 26 June 2020 14: 07
                      0
                      You talked about the "foundations of the economy." I wanted to hear about them.
                      1. Junior Private
                        Junior Private 26 June 2020 14: 12
                        0
                        Textbooks on economics will tell me better. It’s better to start with the Soviet ones.
                      2. 3danimal
                        3danimal 26 June 2020 16: 46
                        0
                        Obsolete and somewhat moldy, alas (Soviet). A lot of ideology in the basics. The result of the Union’s economy does not add credibility to them.
                        Perhaps you can recommend more modern ones?
  • Soviet Union
    Soviet Union 23 June 2020 11: 08
    -1
    Americans are always enemies, in the end, always! We must support and be on the side of their opponents.
    1. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 23 June 2020 11: 22
      +3
      The Chinese have never been friends with us and never will be. It is better to have a frank enemy in front of you than a friend like a friend with a knife behind him. And it is better to watch this scuffle from the side, observing neutrality, trying to derive benefit from it for yourself.
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 25 June 2020 10: 44
        0
        In the 20th century, problems in relations with the United States were ideological in nature, as well as in the expansionism of the Soviets. When at the end of WWII the Union came to Poland .. and stayed there. In contrast to the Americans that liberated Belgium and left. The same Belgians were afraid to repeat the story of the Poles, Chekhs and Slovaks, Hungarians.
        Without a “red” experiment over Russia, such a confrontation would not exist. Separate disagreements, cooling relations - possible.
    2. 3danimal
      3danimal 24 June 2020 12: 06
      0
      They told you so in childhood, they continued to speak as they became. Ask yourself: what can be real motives (not fictitious)?
  • askort154
    askort154 23 June 2020 11: 09
    +3
    Of course, China is a dark horse. But as for the Anglo-Saxons, the centuries-old "acquaintance" of Russia with them has convincingly shown that to believe them, and even more so to "be friends" with them, is not to respect oneself. They keep their promises - only under the gun of the Colt.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 24 June 2020 12: 08
      0
      Lend-Lease - at the sight of Colt? Humanitarian assistance after the Civil? Help in the early 90's, which we somehow sold (including the Sobchake department, led by the current president)?
  • Tatyana Sementsova
    Tatyana Sementsova 23 June 2020 11: 09
    +2
    Judging by the statements of the ex-adviser to Trump, and especially according to comments on the HE, the Russian Government is pursuing the right policy !!!
  • Doccor18
    Doccor18 23 June 2020 11: 30
    0
    reasonable hope that Russia will have some kind of incentive to remain neutral and not help our opponents.

    And he already is. Children, bills, real estate over the hill.
  • Courier
    Courier 23 June 2020 11: 34
    -2
    In the fight against China, India is an order of magnitude more important than Russia.
    Strange Advisor. Suppose Russia is neutral, what is the use for the USA?

    The United States froze economic growth in Russia and caused a new "Brezhnev" stagnation. Why should they now lift the sanctions, in exchange for what. For neutrality? How it will be provided. Will Russia stop sending raw materials to China?

    The United States has other tricks, some obsession with Russia will only hinder.
    With or without Russia, China will remain China.
    The United States will crush China in key technologies, cut off Chinese companies from the dollar, recognize Taiwan’s independence, and in the worst case, they will end all issues by military means.
  • paco.soto
    paco.soto 23 June 2020 14: 20
    0
    Christian Wheaton, a former senior adviser to the United States Department of State during the reign of George W. Bush and Donald Trump. ©
    It’s cold - objective: here it is - the result of the work of foreign intelligence
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 24 June 2020 13: 39
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Here you are wrong. America has NATO and the British Commonwealth. Three dozen industrialized countries of the world, with all resources (Canada, Australia), distributed across all oceans. Not everyone will send troops to fight for America, but they will provide resources and industry for military needs.
    In this regard, the situation of China is worse.

    While the "industrial countries" laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 24 June 2020 13: 48
    0
    laughing We impose an arms race on the West. And it is right
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 27 June 2020 14: 55
      0
      Let's see who goes broke faster good