Military Review

In India, they proposed to strike a blow at the interests of Chinese Huawei: a response to a clash on the border

48
In India, they proposed to strike a blow at the interests of Chinese Huawei: a response to a clash on the border

In India, they came up with a proposal on how to answer China for the death of their troops in the Galvan Valley. We are talking about a skirmish between the Chinese and Indian military, during which it came to the use of stones and metal fittings with pointed tips. Also, wooden batons were subsequently discovered at the scene of the collision, the upper part of which was wrapped with barbed wire.


In India, they continue to say that it is China that is the main culprit of the incident that occurred in Ladakh (Beijing considers some of these territories to be Chinese, calling Aksaychin).

Indian diplomats propose to act with "asymmetric methods." So, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs and the former Indian Ambassador to Russia, Kanwal Sibal, offers to give a “tough economic and technological response.”

Kanval Sibal:

India should announce the immediate official exclusion of Huawei from 5G tests on its territory. This blow to the interests of the Chinese company will have an international resonance and will serve as a lesson to China.

In addition, the Indian diplomat proposes to intensify a technological partnership with the so-called QP (Quadplus) group - Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the USA.

Kanval Sibal:

We need to build new supply chains. Yes, this at the first stage will lead to an increase in economic costs, but now we have no other choice - we will have to get rid of dependence on Chinese companies.

Among other proposals from Indian diplomats: to invite a representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Taiwan for an official visit, to raise the issue of protests in Hong Kong and "infringement of the rights of Uyghurs" in the PRC on the international scene.

It is believed that such Indian initiatives may especially appeal to Washington. And therefore, at least part of them, the Indian authorities may well take on political arms. Individual “hotheads” are not going to follow the path of civilized agreements and de-escalation either in India or in China, which can only aggravate the conflict.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 21 June 2020 15: 07 New
    0
    In India, proposed to strike at the interests of Chinese Huawei
    this is from the category in spite of mom’s frostbitten ears, there are no real competitors
    1. Benedict
      Benedict 21 June 2020 15: 12 New
      -15
      Hindus you roll a barrel on whom ..? China will be odd to you ... They’ll want to immediately and the United States and Israel will not help you with weapons .. Russia will definitely not conflict with China!
      You already got everyone, your dances .. Ugh damn it.
      1. The Little Humpbacked Horse
        The Little Humpbacked Horse 21 June 2020 15: 16 New
        +4
        Quote: Benito
        They’ll want to immediately and the United States and Israel will not help you with weapons


        Why they won’t help, they will even help me a lot, I think the USA has a dream to banish billiard China and India with the same population
        1. Benedict
          Benedict 21 June 2020 15: 43 New
          -9
          Quote: Humpbacked Horse
          Why they won’t help, they will even help me a lot, I think the USA has a dream to banish billiard China and India with the same population

          Better if China and Russia pit .. Here is their ins and outs of a dream!
          And then dunk the winner, etc.
        2. TermNachTer
          TermNachTer 21 June 2020 17: 18 New
          -2
          Yes, it fits into the theory of a few extra billions on the planet.
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 21 June 2020 16: 15 New
        +7
        Quote: Benito
        Hindus you roll a barrel on whom ..? China you odd
        Something is suddenly not a couple ?! Both countries with a billion people and a huge mobilization resource. Both countries have nuclear weapons in service, both countries have powerful and well-armed armies.
        1. Gorecc
          Gorecc 21 June 2020 22: 02 New
          -1
          China’s GDP is 5 times that of India. Since China, against the backdrop of backward India, is an overdeveloped country. Since China produces almost all of its weapons on its own scale. And India is critically dependent on imports of weapons and military equipment. Since the Chinese army is better equipped and better organized.
          Yes, in mountainous conditions you will not particularly turn around, but if a large-scale war breaks out between India and China, then I am more than sure that India will lose. And this I still do not take into account Pakistan at their side, which also probably wants to participate in the conflict)
          1. syndicalist
            syndicalist 21 June 2020 22: 29 New
            +3
            Russia is trying to confront the same US, although the ratio of GDP here is even worse.
          2. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 21 June 2020 23: 28 New
            +3
            GoreccSince the Chinese army is better equipped and better organized.

            In percentage terms, the share of modern B and BT in India is greater ...
            As part of the Indian Army AK divisions and brigades, and as part of the PLA Armies, they, as well as the Russian Federation, completely switched to the brigade system (with rare exceptions), only ours caught on in time and again deployed 1-2 divisions in strategic directions in each TA / Oah ...
            Yes, in mountainous conditions you will not particularly turn around, but if a large-scale war breaks out between India and China, then I am more than sure that India will lose.

            Look at the composition of the NE of India and the PLA and their locations, in the disputed area are about 70 percent. all the Indian armed forces ... the Indian army is more prepared to conduct military operations in the mountains ... India alone has more than a dozen GPAs and the ability to build up forces and assets in India is higher, if you look at the geographical map of the PRC, you will see that the PRC will be difficult to transfer overland additional troops from the eastern countries of the PRC ...
            And I don’t take Pakistan into account at their side, which also probably wants to participate in the conflict)

            Does he need it? There were already three border clashes between the PRC and Pakistan during them did not support the PRC militarily, why will it do it now ...?
            1. Gorecc
              Gorecc 22 June 2020 00: 06 New
              0
              In percentage terms, the share of modern B and BT in India is greater ...

              come on? and besides unfounded statements than confirm?
              I won’t even comment on brigades and divisions ...

              it is more than obvious to me that China’s aviation and navy are better than India’s. The same goes for air defense systems. China also has a quantitative and qualitative advantage in strike means of typical cruise and ballistic missiles. And most importantly, I repeat that China itself produces all this, while India relies on imports for the most part .. Indians have the same zoo of military equipment .. all this will very quickly make itself felt in a large-scale military clash with China. And in such a clash, you can’t limit yourself to the conditional Ladakh .. Therefore, it is better for the Indians to sit on the priest exactly, their level is Pakistan, they can’t take out China, there is too much class difference between the rivals)

              A border clash is one thing, and a large-scale military conflict with the People's Republic of China, which will develop into a war, is quite another. And here Pakistan, with a high degree of probability, can join in order to win Kashmir back, you can’t imagine a better case when all the attention and strength of the Indians will be concentrated on China ..
    2. avg
      avg 21 June 2020 16: 46 New
      -4
      You correctly noticed:
      Quote: _Ugene_
      it’s from the category to spite mom’s frostbitten ears,

      And I would add.
      to invite the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Taiwan for an official visit, to raise the issue of protests in Hong Kong and "infringement of the rights of Uyghurs" in the PRC on the international scene.

      This is all so, just do not forget that "when you live in a glass house you should not throw stones."
      1. Mitroha
        Mitroha 21 June 2020 23: 18 New
        -2
        Interesting girls are dancing. Clashes between the armies of the two states, tensions are also at the state level, and they want to punish a private company. Huawei gets it for everyone, they pull it on right away.
    3. Revolver
      Revolver 21 June 2020 18: 31 New
      +3
      Quote: _Ugene_
      In India, proposed to strike at the interests of Chinese Huawei
      this is from the category in spite of mom’s frostbitten ears, there are no real competitors

      In America, the 5th generation is no longer being tested, but it is being used at all, and from Huawei there is no cog in this. Banned. And in India, if they want, they will do without.
      1. _Ugene_
        _Ugene_ 21 June 2020 18: 38 New
        -3
        In America, the 5th generation is no longer being tested, but it is being used at all, and from Huawei there is no cog in this. Banned. And in India, if they want, they will do without.
        But in India there are no developers and manufacturers for the widespread adoption of 5G, and all Huawei competitors offer the same much more expensive, i.e. you can do without Huawei, but this position will cost a lot of money
        1. Revolver
          Revolver 21 June 2020 18: 44 New
          +1
          Someone will answer "national sovereignty is not for sale," and someone "let my ears freeze in spite of my mother." And some thread "Tata" will jump out and say that they, they say, will do no worse and no more. And there the main thing is to get a contract, then it will be possible, citing objective reasons, to exceed the price.
  2. sav
    sav 21 June 2020 15: 12 New
    0
    India should announce the immediate official exclusion of Huawei from 5G tests on its territory. This blow to the interests of the Chinese company will have an international resonance and will serve as a lesson to China.

    I think that China will not be very upset by such a "lesson"
    1. Nosgoth
      Nosgoth 23 June 2020 18: 59 New
      0
      With Huawei maybe, but with Taiwan and other "blisters" ... it's like the Turks reminding about the Armenian genocide. At the domestic level they simply snort, but when at the interstate, they are immediately offended and worn out.
  3. Ravil_Asnafovich
    Ravil_Asnafovich 21 June 2020 15: 39 New
    +1
    It will be infinite, no one will concede.
  4. knn54
    knn54 21 June 2020 16: 01 New
    -1
    “India, Japan are huge markets, and if they support Huawei, it will have a significant impact on the global telecommunications infrastructure,” Andy Keyser, a former member of the Congressional Intelligence Committee.
    “Huawei is at the forefront of 5G today, and this cannot be ignored. All technologies have some security vulnerabilities or complaints, so excluding Huawei would be wrong,” said a spokesman for the Indian government.
    “Although India has become largely pro-American over the years, I would not say that anti-Chinese positions have prevailed in the country,” Gopal Pillai, former Minister of the Interior of India.
    One “cool” fight changed everything.
    There are more than 700 nationalities in India. A bunch of separatist Sikhs, Dravids / Tamils, Highlanders.
    There are quite a few Maoist movements, so one should be more careful with the Uighurs (which even Pakistan does not support), Taiwan and Hong Kong.
  5. Cowbra
    Cowbra 21 June 2020 16: 02 New
    -4
    As always, Indians punish only themselves. Firstly, no one except the Huawei, now the 5G network just does not do. Secondly, even if we assume that there is some kind of supplier, that it will turn its EXPERIENCED network in India into a working one, India is wasting time and money. Who is losing more? 5G in demand while demand exceeds supply
    1. konstant213
      konstant213 21 June 2020 16: 52 New
      +4
      Huawei is not the only one that offers 5G networks Nokia is also engaged in them.
      1. Cowbra
        Cowbra 21 June 2020 18: 08 New
        -4
        Have you built at least one? So AT&T too saysthat builds)))
    2. Revolver
      Revolver 21 June 2020 18: 35 New
      +2
      Quote: Cowbra
      nobody but the Huawei, now 5G just doesn’t do working networks.

      In America, the 5th generation is no longer being tested, but it is being used at all, and from Huawei there is no cog in this. Banned. And in India, if they want, they will do without Huawei.
      1. Cowbra
        Cowbra 21 June 2020 18: 49 New
        -4
        Just AT & T, and it’s just they messed up something with Huawei. It is precisely there that the topic is very unclear. In the United States, only last year officially proposed to counteract the Huawei, and this year:
        Technology and Media, Feb 04, 23:29

        USA started development own 5G networks as an alternative to Huawei

        Read more at RBC:
        https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/04/02/2020/5e39c5e99a79475650707c4a

        In February - only the BEGINNING wink
        1. Revolver
          Revolver 21 June 2020 19: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: Cowbra
          In February - only the BEGINNING

          ??
          In 2019, 5G and AT&T and Verizon were already in full swing. Samsung S-10 was sold in two versions, with 5G and without; the one that 5G cost a couple hundred dollars more. And this year, almost all high end phones come with 5G without options.
          1. Cowbra
            Cowbra 21 June 2020 20: 19 New
            -4
            What claims to me? How much bought - then sold:
            About it writes The Wall Street Journal with reference to the chief economic adviser to US President Larry Cadlow.
            A magazine with a name, and the link is not to Uncle Vasya, maybe he is in the subject? I’m talking about that, and I’ve heard about the launch of the AT and T grid back in 2018, and there they voted that it was generally “the first in the world”, and that they would be in 12 cities. Yeah, it just turned out to be an ordinary mattress cut, and the nets were test ones, fraud. Specifically look, WHERE are 5G networks working in the USA now? Oops ... About routers on sale - I also know. Where are the nets? And by the way, about the routers - not gu-gu, where they assembled, whose components ... A company such as the African - further - deafly. like in a tank
            1. Revolver
              Revolver 21 June 2020 21: 10 New
              +4
              Quote: Cowbra
              Specifically look for WHERE in the USA there are now working 5G grids?

              In particular, where I live (a suburb of New York City).
              https://www.att.com/idpassets/sales/uf/assets/5g/ATT_5G_Maps_NY.pdf
              More globally, both coasts are almost completely covered. In the outback between the coasts, 5G coverage is only specks, in some places there is no 4G.
              1. Cowbra
                Cowbra 21 June 2020 21: 28 New
                -3
                Listen, since it’s no secret, providers? In the case of Nat))) But honestly - surprised EXTREMELY. Exactly the opposite is infa
                1. Revolver
                  Revolver 21 June 2020 21: 33 New
                  +1
                  This particular card is from AT&T, but Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint offer something similar. They have a free roaming agreement among themselves, i.e. the client doesn’t care if his phone is at one point or another on another network, they don’t take extra money for this.
                  1. Cowbra
                    Cowbra 21 June 2020 22: 01 New
                    -2
                    Quote: Nagan
                    This particular card is from AT&T, but Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint offer something similar. They have a free roaming agreement among themselves, i.e. the client doesn’t care if his phone is at one point or another on another network, they don’t take extra money for this.

                    So it is that I just heard such songs - and more than once. How do you get to a specific point, provider, tariff ... That's what I hear about it. Lion. do you really think that having been engaged in networks, mainly satellite for more than a dozen years, well, I won’t say where with a voyage break - I don’t have any acquaintances on this subject in the USA and Canada?
                    1. Revolver
                      Revolver 21 June 2020 22: 39 New
                      +2
                      From the youthful age I grew up in the USSR. I am familiar with networks exclusively as a user. But in general, for me, as for the majority of the population, this is enough. But I look carefully at the bills from the telephone company, and if strange things appear there, such as roaming, I pay attention to this, call the company, and accordingly they reset it, because it is written in my contract.
                      1. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 21 June 2020 22: 50 New
                        0
                        I believe, NOT a loader ... Well, you tell me specifically - the tariff city? Or the site of the provider? Or so, all the disadvantages do?
                        Do not forget - the question was about the WORKING grid now? Ide?
                      2. Revolver
                        Revolver 21 June 2020 23: 00 New
                        -1
                        Minusil is not me. Regarding specific tariffs, look for yourself, Google to help. I didn’t order 5G, there’s no need, I don’t watch movies on the phone, I don’t play games, it’s enough for Google Maps 4G, so I know no more about tariffs than you do. Initially, it was said that without Huawei there is no 5G, I proved that there is.
                      3. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 21 June 2020 23: 15 New
                        0
                        The fact of the matter is that Google is NOT to help. and for your acquaintances - sorry. they are NOT users - they say that not a single one. Why I was surprised. Well, since you are a spectator. well enrich with knowledge?
                        Sir. in the paragraph that it is - not true
                      4. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 22 June 2020 08: 17 New
                        0
                        And he was NaKhan .. And he was a star .. He went to ask his m * deeds.
                        Himself not ashamed, Naganych?
                      5. Revolver
                        Revolver 22 June 2020 08: 34 New
                        0
                        Why be ashamed? You in that link that I posted looked? The fact that light blue is shaded, 5G coverage areas. Here, a frank star in advertising is fraught with material liability for the company, and if the company is AT&T size, then hundreds of millions will be responsible. And also a criminal liability for those whom the court finds guilty, if it turns out that they starred for selfish purposes, including imprisonment. So the cards are correct.
                      6. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 22 June 2020 08: 40 New
                        0
                        And I saw him for a long time. Swallow, edren root. Well do you really think I'm stupid at all? Price come on. tripod. Not me - you said. headquarters? Do you see them there? And here I am - no, brother. understand at a time - I'm not interested in finding out. who is right and who is lion. Affairs so. that if you’re running such a network in tripods, I’m curious to see at least where, but I don’t have it, except for the test ones, the Pentagon has gathered only this year - and that’s the problem, I know what. And you?
                      7. Revolver
                        Revolver 22 June 2020 08: 46 New
                        0
                        In that case, what are they under the guise of 5G users vparivat? After all, they trade exactly that 5G. Well, or at least that's what they call this service. These and all other providers are filling up my inbox with advertising, they say come to us, we already have commercial use of 5G. Only the plan you need to buy the appropriate and phone.
                      8. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 22 June 2020 09: 52 New
                        0
                        In-of. PonimE, this is another question for marketing - I - not ah. But the 5s are dumb, really. I’m not joking ... There’s a lot of interesting things with her. And what are they ... Zvidkel and rosum?
  • SS-18
    SS-18 21 June 2020 16: 14 New
    +3
    in countries of the "rotting" West, the decline in production .. and extra orders from China and India .. would help these countries raise their GDP, and dump old and new weapons from these treasures and sites from millions of millions.
  • iouris
    iouris 21 June 2020 16: 19 New
    0
    India, ... and according to Skoda.
  • Graz
    Graz 21 June 2020 16: 38 New
    -1
    Well, it will result in joint sanctions, so a double-edged sword
  • Klingon
    Klingon 21 June 2020 17: 33 New
    0
    Quote: konstant213
    Huawei is not the only one that offers 5G networks Nokia is also engaged in them.

    But didn’t Nokia become Chinese ??
  • Courier
    Courier 21 June 2020 18: 06 New
    0
    By August, Huawei will be left without chips thinner than 16 nm. Trump tried
    1. kot423
      kot423 22 June 2020 01: 18 New
      +1
      By August, Huawei will be left without chips thinner than 16 nm.

      Nu-nu ... How stupid personalities with the claim "yes I have a better mind than Einstein" touched me laughing
      MTK (Mediatek, branches from 16 to 7nm, in which the M70 5G modem is built-in) Taiwanese company (initially, only later it reached the world level with its departments also for mattresses and small-shaven ones, and it's not a fact that the mattresses did not steal the technology from them) . And now the question is for the Courier (Courier) - how many preziks of the mattress were enraged in the desire to withdraw Taiwan from under China? And why is Trump better that he promised something there by August? laughing So what red? So it didn’t work out for the black Hawaiian, and he barked abruptly than trump, shaking at the same time not only with his empty pumpkin and fists laughing
  • APASUS
    APASUS 21 June 2020 20: 16 New
    0
    India in a confrontation with China, can easily fall under the dependence of another country. But here we need a middle ground, you can’t solve the problem by flirting with the USA, but only exacerbate it
  • FIR FIR
    FIR FIR 21 June 2020 21: 55 New
    +1
    In India, they proposed to strike a blow at the interests of Chinese Huawei: a response to a clash on the border

    Of course, the PLA is weak, it is necessary for the Huawei.
  • veritas
    veritas 21 June 2020 22: 03 New
    +1
    In India, they proposed to strike a blow at the interests of Chinese Huawei: a response to a clash on the border

    To offer does not mean to refuse. We Zhirinovsky also offers a lot of things. Hindus will not shoot themselves in the foot, and the Chinese will not suffer from such demarches.