The launch of the M51 ICBM from the French submarine led to accusations from Iran

58
The launch of the M51 ICBM from the French submarine led to accusations from Iran

Iran commented on French tests of ballistic missiles capable of carrying several nuclear warheads. According to Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi, launching a new generation of ICBMs is “incompatible with article 6 of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty weapons and France’s commitment to nuclear disarmament. ”

Mousavi:



We urge official Paris to return to fulfilling its international obligations in the field of nuclear disarmament.

These statements from the Iranian Foreign Ministry were made after testing a new version of the M51 intercontinental ballistic missile. ICBMs were launched from the board of the Le Temeraire submarine.

It was previously reported that France during the tests sent ICBMs to one of the areas of the Caribbean.

Why, then, did Iran make indictments against Paris?

The reasons are as follows. This is a kind of response from Tehran to the charges that were brought against him in February this year. Then Iran was engaged in launching its satellite into orbit. From a number of countries, including France, the United States and Israel, statements were made that in such a way “Iran is trying to cover up ongoing development as part of its nuclear missile program.”
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    21 June 2020 09: 49
    Such launches are not prohibited.

    Another thing is that France would do good for the world if it destroyed its nuclear weapons before it became a caliphate. And before that, according to demographics, 30 years are left .... a little., Yes ..
    1. -26
      21 June 2020 09: 57
      Demographers from channel 1?

      Arabs are migrants in the 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, they are different people. Especially in France. A Frenchman is a collective nation, not an ethnic group at all.
      1. +12
        21 June 2020 10: 05
        Quote: Courier
        Demographers from channel 1?

        Arabs are migrants in the 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, they are different people. Especially in France. A Frenchman is a collective nation, not an ethnic group at all.


        And how long has it become such a "collective", and for what reason? Can you explain, as an expert on French demography?
      2. +12
        21 June 2020 10: 13
        Quote: Courier
        Demographers from channel 1?

        From the first French and others
        Quote: Courier
        Migrant arabs in 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, this different people.

        Certainly: the first still somehow worked.

        The second ones do not work at all
        Quote: Courier
        Frenchman collective nation

        What kind of beast is this? belay

        It’s good that the Frenchman does not even know this. Yes
        1. +12
          21 June 2020 11: 32
          Why don’t they work? They even work ... all drug traffickers are in the hands of second-wave migrantswassat
          1. +4
            21 June 2020 13: 25
            Quote: lonely
            Why don’t they work? They even work ... all drug traffickers are in the hands of second-wave migrants

            Sorry, I, in the old fashioned way, still consider WORK for work recourse

            You are right-drugs, prostitution control, racketeering, social benefits- basically. and live. (most).
            The most harmless, give birth to many children and live on ... children's benefits. And live well!
      3. +7
        21 June 2020 10: 16
        Muslims (these are not only Arabs, but also Kabil, Berbers and Negroes from Muslim countries) in the second and third generation in France are much more susceptible to radical Islamist propaganda and much more willing to live under Sharia than migrant workers of the 1960s and 1970s who fled from their countries to France.
      4. +3
        21 June 2020 10: 38
        Do the French themselves know about this, or were you embarrassed to inform them?
      5. +2
        21 June 2020 10: 43
        Quote: Courier
        A Frenchman is a collective nation, not an ethnic group at all.

        Yes collective, of those EUROPEAN peoples who lived and live on the territory of France.
        1. +2
          21 June 2020 12: 09
          All nations were formed ..... at different times. Collectively and not entirely voluntarily. Remember the song of Dartanyan ... Burgundy ...
        2. -1
          21 June 2020 16: 45
          Quote: svp67
          of those EUROPEAN peoples

          Pancake! And I did not know that Algeria is a European country !!!! fellow
          1. 0
            21 June 2020 20: 55
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            Pancake! And I did not know that Algeria is a European country !!!!

            A replica is not appropriate. The French nation was formed long before France acquired the colonies.
            1. 0
              22 June 2020 00: 56
              Sir, look at the holy calendar!
              A lot of Algerians have passports of the Fifth Republic! France recognizes the institution of dual citizenship.
              Formally, they are the same citizens of the country as Bologna or Gascon!
              This is a problem with mentality ... So this is a matter of multiculturalism policy ...
              1. 0
                22 June 2020 07: 06
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                A lot of Algerians have passports of the Fifth Republic!

                Yes, even if they have what they have, but that will not change the story.
      6. 0
        21 June 2020 14: 34
        Demographers from channel 1?


        Yes no. These are the same demographers that predicted 90 million people in Russia. Oh, how they determined it only they know. There was an article about it recently.
        Do you feel sorry for the French? or is the prospect of not dying in Paris upset, as every self-respecting, insensitive intellectual dreams of?

        Arabs are migrants in the 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, they are different people


        Comfort yourself with this thought. that is why in all cities of Europe and the USA there are areas where, in principle, it is not recommended that the indigenous people and strangers be present. and Paris is no exception North and West stations - enclaves of compact habitat of Arabs and immigrants from North Africa
      7. 0
        21 June 2020 21: 52
        Quote: Courier
        Frenchman, this is a collective nation

        A deeply ignorant judgment. But it doesn’t even matter.
        Caliphate defines religion. Caliphate is a theocratic Islamic state. And it doesn’t matter at all whether a collective nation or ethnic group proclaims it in itself.
    2. +1
      21 June 2020 10: 11
      Quote: Olgovich
      Such launches are not prohibited.

      what kind? the French or the Iranians?
      1. +3
        21 June 2020 10: 27
        Quote: poquello
        what kind? the French or the Iranians?

        none
    3. -4
      21 June 2020 10: 18
      Quote: Olgovich
      And before that, according to demographics, 30 years are left ...

      Well, just the life of warheads is 25 years, as far as I remember. Further, plutonium degrades) And of the Muslims, nuclear weapons are only in Pakistan, and that, obviously, they didn’t do it, but now China helps combat readiness ...
    4. 0
      21 June 2020 10: 20
      Such launches are not prohibited.

      Those. satellite output is "nizzy", and intercontinental output (by default - military development, from a military boat), is it possible? Or did the French celebrate the captain's day in this way?
      1. +2
        21 June 2020 10: 31
        Quote: kot423
        Those. satellite output is "nizzy", and intercontinental output (by default - military development, from a military boat), is it possible? Or did the French celebrate the captain's day in this way?

        . Where did you see this "ie" ? belay

        "Those." invented by you.

        And it is possible for funks and Iranians.
        1. -1
          21 June 2020 10: 47
          If it sounds vague to you i.e. (that is), replace with "means". Your post is also vague just for understanding, like "francs can."
        2. nks
          -1
          22 June 2020 14: 19
          Everything is simple here - Iran violates UN Security Council resolution 2231 (2015) by its launch, and France does not violate the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (by the way, Iran is violating it again). The issue of the existence of UN Resolution 2231 is a separate issue (although it is connected with the same violation by Iran of the said Treaty on Non-Race ...) Iran, in principle, could say its "feu" by withdrawing from the UN, but it does not.
          1. 0
            23 June 2020 07: 14
            Quote: nks
            Everything is simple - Iran, by its launch, violates UN Security Council resolution 2231 (2015),

            There is NO ban on such a launch in the Resolution
            Quote: nks
            France does not violate the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Iran, by the way, violates it again, by the way).

            France does not violate and Iran, by the way, does not violate
            Quote: nks
            The issue of the existence of UN Resolution 2231 is a separate one.

            Quote: nks
            The issue of the existence of UN Resolution 2231 is a separate one.

            From what .... separate?
            Quote: nks
            Iran, in principle, could say its "fairy" by leaving the UN, but it does not.

            everyone can.
            with what fright?
            1. nks
              0
              23 June 2020 15: 28
              Quote: Olgovich
              There is NO ban on such a launch in the Resolution

              Strictly speaking, nothing is forbidden to Iran there (resolutions cannot prohibit - states can undertake obligations only voluntarily) - financial sanctions are imposed, etc. on individuals and organizations. And to the state of Iran

              "appeals not to carry out any activity related to the development and creation of ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including _ballistic missile launches_, until a date eight years after the date of adoption of the JCPOA,
              or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the expanded opinion, whichever comes first. "
              This is what Iran does not comply with, as stated in the statement of France


              Quote: Olgovich
              From what .... separate?

              separate from the topic of this news - I just don’t want to breed a flame here and go into the jungle of the Iranian nuclear program, although I briefly mentioned the essence.
              1. 0
                23 June 2020 15: 48
                Quote: nks
                Strictly speaking, nothing is forbidden to Iran there (resolutions cannot prohibit - states can undertake obligations only voluntarily) - financial sanctions are imposed, etc. on individuals and organizations. And to the state of Iran

                What is it about: there is no ban, no violation (there is nothing to violate), which you incorrectly indicated.
                1. nks
                  0
                  23 June 2020 16: 49
                  Not only prohibitions can be violated, but I don't see any particular reason for a terminological dispute here (let it be "does not fulfill"), and I think I have explained the essence of the issue quite clearly
      2. 0
        21 June 2020 12: 10
        This, of course, is PR. Soviet space was also secondary.
    5. -2
      21 June 2020 13: 27
      How is the situation in Moscow?
    6. -1
      21 June 2020 16: 41
      Russia has even less time given the trend ..
  2. +3
    21 June 2020 09: 58
    Now the "ball" is on the side of France.
  3. +4
    21 June 2020 10: 12
    Then Iran was engaged in launching its satellite into orbit. From a number of countries, including France, the United States and Israel, statements were made that in this way “Iran is trying to cover up ongoing development as part of its nuclear missile program.”

    Well, Iran is rightly raising this topic .. After all, someone in the world can do EVERYTHING, but someone is immediately bombed for disobedience .. Double standards on the face .. They even piss in the eyes all "dew of God" ..
    1. +4
      21 June 2020 12: 11
      Sure. Moreover, some "critics" have nuclear weapons themselves (unregistered) and BR.
      1. -6
        21 June 2020 12: 20
        Among "some critics" no one calls for the destruction of other states and does not hold millions of rallies with the slogans "death to Iran."
        1. +3
          21 June 2020 13: 15
          But it does not kill the enemies of the regime in other countries
          1. -1
            21 June 2020 13: 20
            Actually kills.
            1. 0
              21 June 2020 13: 21
              Syria does not count
              1. 0
                21 June 2020 15: 04
                I'm talking about the murder of an Iranian judge in Europe.
                1. +3
                  21 June 2020 15: 23
                  Anything can happen. Compare with the obedient list of Israel.
                  1. 0
                    22 June 2020 13: 55
                    In Israel, political killings are extremely rare and condemned by everyone.
        2. +1
          21 June 2020 15: 08
          According to יהוה (Elijah, or YHWH) He said: I יהוה will gather the enemies of Iran on Mount Elburs and they will be like a grain, where birds (death) will peck them, the people and their kingdom will destroy. over the past 2500 years, more than 40 empires have attacked Iran, everything is gone! Do not forget the screamers from Israel, it was Iran that saved you from the Babylonian captivity, gave its gold to rebuild the temple of Solomon, and gave land, and how many wars did Iran do for this? after which יהוה scattered you around the world, and said that you destroy each other and cursed until the end of time. you don’t have to go far; Israeli Alley program; make a war; force the Jews to leave their places and move to Israel !!!!
        3. 0
          22 June 2020 00: 37
          Quote: ZeevZeev
          Among "some critics" no one calls for the destruction of other states

          Yeah. They tentatively declare that such a state does not exist and are pushing to destroy what they claim already does not exist. Pharisaism has not become more logical over the centuries
          1. 0
            22 June 2020 13: 56
            That is how Iran behaves.
      2. +1
        21 June 2020 13: 13
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Sure. Moreover, some "critics" have nuclear weapons themselves (unregistered) and BR.

        Yes, yes .. And most of all they scream ... And they’ll hi
  4. +3
    21 June 2020 10: 16
    Yes, the Persians of the French ate ... wassat
  5. +3
    21 June 2020 10: 19
    Iran is right that if there is any movement on its part, then the whole "progressive" world begins to condemn in unison, and the Americans prepare new sanctions. France is right that you want it or not, and it is necessary to carry out launches during tests at least periodically.
    1. -4
      21 June 2020 13: 31
      France is understandable and predictable. But Iran is incomprehensible and therefore unpredictable.
  6. +3
    21 June 2020 10: 20
    The launched missile did not carry a nuclear warhead. The launch itself was carried out in accordance with all international obligations of France in the field of testing. In particular, the section in the Sargasso Sea was closed for navigation.
    1. +4
      21 June 2020 10: 23
      Quote: knn54
      The launched rocket did not carry a nuclear warhead.

      Iranian rocket too.
      1. +1
        21 June 2020 12: 12
        She is generally peaceful and cosmic.
      2. -2
        21 June 2020 12: 23
        France is not in a hot confrontation with half the countries of the region and in Paris (for now) a group of religious fanatics does not rule.
        1. +1
          21 June 2020 19: 08
          Quote: ZeevZeev
          France is not in a hot confrontation

          Located.
          With Syria. They support terrorists there. Participated in the destruction of Libya 9 years ago. In the same year, participated in the overthrow of the president of the Ivory Coast. In year 13, military interventions in Mali and the Central African Republic

          A very and very aggressive country.

          Quote: ZeevZeev
          a group of religious fanatics does not rule.

          She is ruled by political fanatics.
  7. 0
    21 June 2020 10: 41
    "An eye for an eye..."
  8. -1
    21 June 2020 10: 46
    Quote: Courier
    Demographers from channel 1?

    Arabs are migrants in the 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, they are different people. Especially in France. A Frenchman is a collective nation, not an ethnic group at all.

    Something you have, dear Courier, with a rating here is not very. Demographic expert?
  9. 0
    21 June 2020 10: 59
    Well, they fired and fired, that's why they were missiles, what would they shoot. Another thing is interesting, how everything in the world is interconnected. Here the French fired a racket, and on the same day their nuclear submarine burned down right in the dock, but so thoroughly burned down that it could not be restored. On "VO" about this somehow they said briefly, and after all, for every fire in our Navy or other structures of the Ministry of Defense, there is a cry for a week. And here is silence. Don't want to upset your partners? In the course of the play, the French had a kind of hint: if you shoot missiles, you will burn! lol
  10. +1
    21 June 2020 12: 42
    Quote: Courier
    Demographers from channel 1?

    Arabs are migrants in the 1st generation, and their descendants in the second, they are different people. Especially in France. A Frenchman is a collective nation, not an ethnic group at all.

    Especially after the destruction of Gascons and Provence.
  11. 0
    21 June 2020 15: 09
    According to יהוה (Elijah, or YHWH) He said: I יהוה will gather the enemies of Iran on Mount Elburs and they will be like a grain, where birds (death) will peck them, the people and their kingdom will destroy. over the past 2500 years, more than 40 empires have attacked Iran, everything is gone! Do not forget the screamers from Israel, it was Iran that saved you from the Babylonian captivity, gave its gold to rebuild the temple of Solomon, and gave land, and how many wars did Iran do for this? after which יהוה scattered you around the world, and said that you destroy each other and cursed until the end of time. you don’t have to go far; the Israeli Alley program; build a war; make the Jews leave their places and move to Israel !!!! that's it
  12. -1
    21 June 2020 20: 04
    Quote: I. A. Krylov
    Ay pug, know she is strong

    Because for Iran and France - an elephant.