Military Review

Western users tried to ridicule the Russian Tu-95 after another interception over Alaska

103
Western users tried to ridicule the Russian Tu-95 after another interception over Alaska

The US military command reports that for the second time in a week, fighters in Alaska had to fly into the air because of the appearance of “Russian military aircraft near the US airspace” aviation».


The report said that Russian aircraft "reached the US air border at a distance of about 32 nautical miles" (about 59 km).

From the summary:

The air group consisted of two bombers and an early warning aircraft. They walked along the coast of the United States without violating the American air border.

After some time, information appeared that the flight to the east of the Russian borders was carried out by strategic bombers Tu-95MS VKS of Russia. As a few days earlier, fifth-generation F-22 fighters were sent into the air to “escort” them.
Recall that earlier in the USA they announced the appearance of Russian strategic bombers, accompanied by Su-35 fighters of the 4 ++ generation.

From an early post from the NORAD press service:

F-22 Raptors, with the support of the Stratotankers KC-135 and the on-board warning and control system E-3, successfully carried out two interceptions of Russian bombers entering the air defense identification zone of Alaska.



If such photos appeared with the American strategic bombers captured on them, then the Pentagon would immediately have declared the traditional "Russian pilots acted unprofessionally, making dangerous rapprochement." In their case, of course, they are not talking about any danger in the US Department of Defense.

In the comments of Western users on the North American command post on social networks, a collage appeared with an attempt to ridicule Russian strategic aviation:


In the American accounts of social networks added that "Russia continues to raise its" irrelevant old men "into the air.

The user was clearly going to demonstrate how the US fighter aircraft is developing amid the fact that Russia has the same Tu-95s in service. But for the sake of honesty, the same user should have published photos with American strategic bombers - those that have been in the US arsenal for more than half a century, and all this time they continue to carry out their tasks. The B-52 has been in service with the United States since the mid-1950s, and, according to Washington, has not lost its relevance. Against the cancellation of these strategic bombers are actively opposed by the Committee on Defense and Arms of the US Congress.
Photos used:
NORAD, Twitter / Bonner terraplanista
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Bashkirkhan
    Bashkirkhan 19 June 2020 08: 03
    33
    Tu-95 immortal plane. Time is not domineering on him.
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 19 June 2020 08: 08
      +8
      US user was clearly about to demonstratehow the US fighter aircraft is developing amid the fact that Russia has the same Tu-95 in service.

      There is a saying in Russia that "each sandpiper praises its swamp"!
      1. figwam
        figwam 19 June 2020 08: 37
        51
        The report said that Russian aircraft "reached the US air border at a distance of about 32 nautical miles" (about 59 km).
        If he applies what he carries, about five thousand, then no raptor will rise anywhere.
        1. Interlocutor
          Interlocutor 19 June 2020 10: 31
          +8
          will not rise anywhere.


          It will be in time to rise, but perhaps there will be nowhere to return.
      2. seregatara1969
        seregatara1969 19 June 2020 08: 41
        23
        But what is silent about the incident in the Norwegian sea? Not in a vein? When two of those 142 went into the unknown from five interceptors. The same old people fly slowly
      3. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 19 June 2020 09: 09
        11
        Quote: Tatiana

        The US user was clearly going to demonstrate how the US fighter aircraft is developing amid the fact that Russia has the same Tu-95 in service.

        To this in Russia there is a saying that "every sandpiper praises his swamp"!

        And forgetting, moreover, that the same B-52s of the 1955 release are in the ranks of the American Air Force.
        1. bayard
          bayard 19 June 2020 18: 07
          +4
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Russia has the same Tu-95 in service.

          Those, but not those. wink
          Those that were built in the 50s / 60s have long been decommissioned. But those that are now in service are built in the late 70s / early 80s. So the planes are quite fresh, of the latest modification and fully comply with the requirements for long-range bombers - carriers of long-range missiles.
          Rђ RІRѕS,
          Quote: tihonmarine
          in the ranks of the US Air Force are the same B-52 release of 1955.

          , and the youngest B-52 - 62 release.
          We also have photos with interceptions of B-52 by our fighters. yes
          1. Ilya Nikitich
            Ilya Nikitich 20 June 2020 12: 30
            +1
            Quote: bayard
            We also have photos with interceptions of B-52 by our fighters.

            And we also have photos of how our fighters "knock down" the B-52 (for example, in Vietnam)
    2. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 19 June 2020 08: 23
      38
      In order to cause "unacceptable" damage, the Tu-95 does not need to approach the US borders at 32 nautical miles ... missile range - 5500 km, X - 102 in the nuclear version, for some reason users who prefer to laugh - Forget about it !
      Normal Operation of Strategic Aviation!
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 19 June 2020 18: 35
        +1
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Forget about it!

        They have not forgotten, they are just trying to make black with white.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 19 June 2020 08: 07
    25
    A normal plane ... nothing to grind ... Does it perform its functions? Performs! And how much fuel it saves with its turboprops ... laughing
    1. svp67
      svp67 19 June 2020 08: 14
      22
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Performs! And how much fuel it saves with its turboprops ...

      And the infrared equipment of the satellites is not detected ....
      1. Bashkirkhan
        Bashkirkhan 19 June 2020 08: 17
        32
        NATO classification bear.
        1. svp67
          svp67 19 June 2020 08: 20
          13
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          NATO classification bear.

        2. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 19 June 2020 09: 46
          14
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          NATO classification bear.

          The old horse, and the furrow is even and deep. soldier
        3. Fitter
          Fitter 19 June 2020 12: 34
          +4
          "Bear" comes out of the den :)
  3. bober1982
    bober1982 19 June 2020 08: 09
    15
    Yesterday, another American aircraft (F-18) crashed into the sea, as they say - the one who laughs last laughs well.
    1. 5-9
      5-9 19 June 2020 09: 51
      10
      You should not laugh at this ... ours also fall ... only he who does not fly does not fall ...
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 19 June 2020 09: 58
        +4
        Quote: 5-9
        only he who does not fly does not fall ...

        Gold words.
      2. Grits
        Grits 19 June 2020 13: 37
        -1
        Quote: 5-9
        only he who does not fly does not fall ...

        Given the fact that they have more aircraft, then they should fall more often.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 19 June 2020 18: 36
      0
      Quote: bober1982
      Yesterday another American plane (F-18) crashed into the sea

      I express my condolences to the family and loved ones.
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 19 June 2020 18: 49
        +1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        I express my condolences to the family and relatives

        So after all they were found and picked up, what condolences? Alive, and full of strength.
      2. Fast_mutant
        Fast_mutant 22 June 2020 07: 50
        -1
        I venture to grab the minuses, but my opinion is that I express my condolences at the death of the enemy is the best example of expanding the Overton window. Do not ride on the bones, but quietly rejoice. And then it’s already very close to expressing condolences to the parents of Hitler, or General Ishii.
  4. Slon1978
    Slon1978 19 June 2020 08: 11
    55
    Our American friends successfully intercepted the Tu-95, our AWACS aircraft successfully removed the F-22 EPR profile, everyone is happy. This is what mutually beneficial cooperation means. Since the interception operation is not the first, it can be assumed that the F-22 EPR is not removed for the first time and the radio reflection data of this aircraft from most angles are already in the file cabinet.
    1. depressant
      depressant 19 June 2020 08: 38
      10
      Nice to read a professional comment. Honestly, an unexpected point of view.
    2. vic02
      vic02 19 June 2020 09: 24
      15 th
      our AWACS aircraft successfully removed the E-F-22 profile
      He took a profile, just not the one. The F-22 profile is distorted by the Luneberg lenses installed on it. At the hour "H" (or "X", as you wish), these lenses will be removed and the profile will be different.
      1. shinobi
        shinobi 19 June 2020 12: 14
        +5
        The infrared signature of the exhaust horseradish than disguise. His exhaust from the orbit is visible. What is there.
        1. vic02
          vic02 19 June 2020 14: 46
          -3
          A friend told about the A-50. And where is the IR range?
    3. ancient
      ancient 19 June 2020 10: 45
      +3
      Quote: Slon1978
      Since the interception operation is not the first, it can be assumed that the F-22 EPR is not removed for the first time and the radio reflection data of this aircraft from most angles are already in the file cabinet.

      You may have forgotten, but all F-22 Raptors are equipped with Luneberg lenses, a special device that increases the aircraft's RCS in centimeter waves.
      They are designed to hide the true value of the EPR and the real mark of the target from a likely enemy in peacetime.
      As a result, the radar will not be able to correctly identify the type of target and the real range of detection.

      In addition, the AN / APG-77 radar will "work" either in passive mode or in general .. "for equivalent", and for the control center and the withdrawal of fighters to the attack (interception) line there is E-3A / B / C.
      Communication channels and data transmission are the same "closed" and operate on changeable frequencies.
      So the card index is most likely .. "visual aid" in peacetime soldier
      1. Ramzaj99
        Ramzaj99 19 June 2020 12: 42
        +7
        Quote: ancient
        So the card index is most likely .. "visual aid" in peacetime

        Jews in Syria vryatli fly with lenses flying with lenses) .... And they fly there almost over the heads of the S-400, naturally by agreement with the Russian side. So all these EPRs have long been in the file cabinet and from all angles .........
    4. Federal1
      Federal1 20 June 2020 12: 20
      -3
      it’s very subtly noticed that it’s somehow overlooked that the raptors are not approaching in a combat configuration, for example, with an open hatch or a suspended rocket, and yes to the point, the Americans are very stupid recourse recourseand if the Americans use the new technique and do it right, they paid money for it, it’s not inflatable with -300 in Syria that can’t shoot or impotent s-400 in hmeimime, something like that
  5. Ragnar Lodbrok
    Ragnar Lodbrok 19 June 2020 08: 14
    14
    "Russia continues to lift its" irrelevant oldies "into the air.
    The B-52 has been in service with the United States since the mid-1950s,

    1:1
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 19 June 2020 08: 50
      10
      Quote: Ragnar Lothbrok
      1:1


      So it would be, but the "trick" is that the "freshest" Boeing B-52 Stratofortress in service is much older and more mossy than the "irrelevant old man" Tu-95MS of the RF Aerospace Forces ...
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 19 June 2020 12: 16
        -7
        Quote: Insurgent

        So it would be, but the "trick" is that the "freshest" Boeing B-52 Stratofortress in service is much older and more mossy than the "irrelevant old man" Tu-95MS of the RF Aerospace Forces ...

        Especially for YOU about antiquity and mossiness B-52H
        Length: 49 m
        Maximum speed: 1 046 km / h
        Wingspan: 56 m
        Range: 14 162 km
        Weight: 83 250 kg
        Engine types: Pratt & Whitney JT3D, Pratt & Whitney J57
        The new active electron-scan radar, based on the APG-79 and APG-82 Raytheon, will increase the range at which the B-52 can detect targets, and increase the number of targets that the bomber can detect, according to Raytheon.
        Full-color LCD displays, updated computers and several new communication channels are implemented under the Combat Network Communication Technology program. The update will allow the B-52 to broadcast a stream in real time, which provides intelligence and other parameters during the flight
        To date, 60 of 76 aircraft have received these modifications modifications.
        In June 2019, the service revealed that in flight tests, the B-52 carried a hypersonic missile. Weapons known as AGM-183A, or ARRW
        LONG RANGE LARGE RANGE The LRSO will replace the AGM-86B air-launched cruise missile. LRSO can be equipped with either a nuclear or conventional warhead.
        JASSM more than doubles the range of the bomber's strike to 926 km. This allows the clumsy, B-52H to hit targets, while avoiding proximity to dangerous air defense systems, each B-52 for the first time can carry smart weapons inside and on its pylons.

        The B-52 rotary launcher, on which you can see up to eight LRSM cruise missiles, is being upgraded so that it can use fully digital smart weapons and decoys.
        This is very brief about "MOLD"
        1. nPuBaTuP
          nPuBaTuP 19 June 2020 12: 41
          +6
          In June 2019, the service revealed that in flight tests, the B-52 carried a hypersonic missile.

          What is it they have such a rocket?
          JASSM more than doubles the range of the bomber's strike to 926 km. This allows the clumsy, B-52H to hit targets, while avoiding proximity to dangerous, air defense systems

          Seriously? ..... 926 km?
          And the range of our missiles do not tell me? .....
          So with moss they slowly grow .... and their weapons ....
          1. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 19 June 2020 12: 58
            -2
            Quote: nPuBaTuP
            What is it they have such a rocket?

            1. I'm not going to measure it, I just gave the information that I need to know the opponent in person and hats of any size will not help.
            2. Read it.
            http://nevskii-bastion.ru/?s=AGM-158+JASSM
            1. nPuBaTuP
              nPuBaTuP 19 June 2020 13: 02
              +5
              Well, sometimes you turn your head on .... they say there is a brain ......
              Why write about hypersonic missiles from sailors if hee is not there and will not be there for a long time? .....
              and rewrite nonsense from other resources ......
              1. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 19 June 2020 13: 11
                -8
                Quote: nPuBaTuP
                sailors, if hee is not there and will not be there for a long time? .....

                1. Learn to lead a discussion and understand that I owe you nothing.
                2 Read not only Russian publications at the level of https://avia.pro/
              2. Federal1
                Federal1 20 June 2020 12: 28
                -4
                comrade retired privatur there just cartoons again for you began to admire, without it now no way!
        2. Insurgent
          Insurgent 19 June 2020 13: 04
          +6
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          Especially for YOU about antiquity and mossiness B-52H


          I understand that for hmm ... an ally, you are not only ready to tear a button accordion (accordion) ...

          But we are talking about antiquity and mossiness, we are talking about years of release ...

          Here CAM,specially for myself, inquire about the information when the "freshest" B-52 was released, and when the most rotten Tu-95 MS, from the operational units ...

          Check out the glider resources for yourself ...
          1. nPuBaTuP
            nPuBaTuP 19 June 2020 13: 14
            +7
            ask for information
            Yes, he is not interested .....
            The most important thing is to throw more of the known mass onto the fan ...... and then how it goes .....
            1. Vitaly gusin
              Vitaly gusin 19 June 2020 15: 07
              -5
              Quote: nPuBaTuP
              The most important thing is to throw more of the known mass onto the fan ...... and then how it goes ....

              There are cruise missiles in the arsenal of aircraft that can hit strategic targets. Moreover, the B-1B will not necessarily fly into the Russian air defense zone. This is about JASSM-ER, which are armed not only B-1B, but also B-52Has well as F / A-18. In the future, this missile will receive the F-35.
              This cruise missile was created almost ten years ago, but in the United States it was modernized specifically to bypass air defense systems.
              The guidance system is threefold: inertial, by GPS, and infrared in the final part of the trajectory. JASSM, or AGM-158, has a high degree of protection against electronic interference. Russia has achieved good results in this area, but JASSM was created to overcome such obstacles.
              The body of the warhead is made of tungsten alloy. Inside - 400 kg of low-sensitivity explosive AFX-757. It is also possible to equip a cluster warhead, and perhaps a nuclear one.
              Each rocket costs approximately $ 400 thousand. Composite materials are widely used in its design, and the body is entirely made of carbon fiber.
              In fact, this is an inconspicuous kamikaze drone. The United States used AGM-158 in 2018 in Syria.
              1. Charik
                Charik 20 June 2020 09: 56
                0
                Yes, Russia doesn’t care what kind of smart missiles and amers there are and what kind of planes are invisible — it will not happen between these countries of the war as you want it to happen — it doesn’t help all the invisibility and cleverness — it’s screwed up so that it’s possible to destroy everything — this weapon can only kill those who cannot defend itself and give change, but with Russia this will not work
                1. Vitaly gusin
                  Vitaly gusin 20 June 2020 11: 01
                  -4
                  Quote: Charik
                  will not happen between these countries of war how do you want her

                  1 Please provide where I wrote this.
                  2 My answer was to SUGGESTED B-52 without any threats, try not to cheat.
                  Quote: Charik
                  happen all this

                  "We, as martyrs, will go to heaven, but they will simply die."
                  The whole question is who it will be and what is the difference between this, so far no one has told.
                  1. Charik
                    Charik 20 June 2020 11: 22
                    +2
                    in your commentary teska, you mentioned Russia 2 times-1) B-52 is not included in the Russian air defense zone 2) Jasm was created in order to overcome the obstacles available to Russia. Here is your desire-opinion that American weapons are to fight against the Russian Federation, and if it is if something happens ("We, as martyrs, will go to heaven, and they will simply die"), it will be many of the living - Planet Earth
                    1. Vitaly gusin
                      Vitaly gusin 20 June 2020 12: 00
                      -2
                      Quote: Charik
                      in your comment, Teska, you mentioned Russia 2 times; 1) B-52 is not included in the Russian air defense zone 2) Jasm was created to overcome the obstacles that existed and took away the course of your Russian thought. and

                      Thank you, I understand your train of thought.
                      And against whom is everyone supernovaeimean analogies in the world?
                      2019 was the year of a real arms race for Russia, and Moscow shows that it is not afraid of this. Moreover: the top Russian leadership and the command of the armed forces declares the buildup of the country's military power with undisguised enthusiasm.
                      And you want to convince me that all this is for the destruction of barmaley in Syria.
                      Please do not consider others dumber than you.
                      1. Charik
                        Charik 20 June 2020 18: 49
                        +1
                        Yes, I don’t think it’s stupid - sayings - you just don’t have to drag Russia under the blows of American weapons - all the more so Russia's military power is being built up to attack anyone, attack Europe stupidly-tied-gas-oil-Baltic states didn’t fall - feed the little ones - on USAA - death to all, yes, and something in memory I don’t have Russia attacking anyone
                      2. nPuBaTuP
                        nPuBaTuP 21 June 2020 00: 53
                        0
                        And against whom is everyone supernovaeimean analogies in the world?

                        Here a man in Russian explains to you
                        "Russia's military power is being built up for attacking anyone — Europe — stupidly-tied-gas-oil-Baltic states haven’t fallen into the mustache –– to feed the little ones –– to the USA –– death to everyone –– and I don’t have anything in memory Russia attacked someone[i] [/ i] "
                        And you again taldychish that Russia is preparing attacks against someone ... is pumping its weapons, etc.
                        Do not you understand that you contradict yourself ....?
                        Quote: Charik
                        will happen between these countries of war as you want it

                        And where did you read this, you confused me with someone.

                        Want, want .... but keep quiet ....
                2. Vitaly gusin
                  Vitaly gusin 20 June 2020 21: 43
                  0
                  Quote: Charik
                  happen between these war countries how do you want her

                  And where did you read this, you confused me with someone.
                  1. Charik
                    Charik 20 June 2020 22: 07
                    +1
                    JASSM, or AGM-158, has a high degree of protection against electronic interference. Russia has achieved good results in this area, but JASSM was created to overcome such obstacles. Yes, you’ve lured your comment, where and where in Karaganda
              2. forpost
                forpost 20 June 2020 19: 44
                +1
                "Each rocket costs approximately $ 400." - Production cost of plain AGM-158 JASSM: $ 0,85 million
                "Its design uses a lot of composite materials, and the body is made entirely of carbon fiber. In fact, it is an unobtrusive kamikaze drone. The US used the AGM-158 in 2018 in Syria." - According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, 12 CDs of this type were intercepted by the BUK-M2 air defense system during the attack on the Dumeir airfield.
                1. Vitaly gusin
                  Vitaly gusin 20 June 2020 21: 35
                  -1
                  Quote: forpost
                  According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, 12 missiles of this type were intercepted by the BUK-M2 air defense system during the attack on the Dumeir airfield.

                  Everyone finds and reads what he likes, but everything must be read.
                  Missiles were launched from a B-1 bomber. According to the US Department of Defense, all 19 missiles hit the target.
                  Each information from Syria says about "a repulsed attack of unidentified flying objects", and at the end that some damage has been done, and after a few days it turns into warehouses with weapons of the enterprise for the manufacture of these weapons.
                  On this you need to read a lot of different presses.
                  And this rocket is not as simple as some would like.
                  1. forpost
                    forpost 21 June 2020 10: 13
                    0
                    At the same time, it is not said anywhere that only 19 of them have been used all the time, is not it? And there is no evidence that all 19 flew.
                    1. Vitaly gusin
                      Vitaly gusin 21 June 2020 11: 31
                      0
                      Quote: forpost
                      Moreover, it is not said anywhere that in all of them only 19 were used.

                      If you carefully read it is written
                      According to the US Department of Defense, all 19 missiles hit the target.
                      But for you I will give another quote
                      Two US Air Force B-1B fighters from the 34th Expeditionary Bomber Squadron fired at a total of 19 JASSM-ER.

                      The first hit on target was the Barzeh Research and Development Center near Damascus, which was hit by 57 Tomahawks and all 19 JASSM-ER.

                      Two B-1 Lancers released in a total of 19 JASSMs as part of attacks on the three Syrian governments of the alleged targets of chemical weapons. All 19 missiles JASSM were released at a research center in Barz, which was destroyed during the strike. Reportedly Russian state media, two missiles that could not explode were discovered by the Syrian Arab army and delivered to Russia on April 18 for study - no evidence of this allegation was provided;
                      We must read all the media and draw conclusions ourselves.
                      1. forpost
                        forpost 21 June 2020 14: 41
                        0
                        "at the research center in Barza", "12 missile-defense systems of this type were intercepted by the BUK-M2 air defense system during the attack on the Dumeir airfield."
                        Of course, I understand that the Chukchi is a brake, but not to the same extent ..
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 19 June 2020 08: 14
    14
    Western users tried to ridicule the Russian Tu-95 after another interception over Alaska

    They also talked a lot about our efforts and even laughed ... now they are silent in a rag, since they still CANNOT wipe the snot!
    The plane is SUMMER GOOD, the plane is able to efficiently carry out its tasks ... users are all the same, Pentagon generals are very aware of this and have no illusions, silently.
    1. Glaaki
      Glaaki 20 June 2020 11: 18
      -1
      They also talked a lot about our efforts and even laughed ... now they are silent in a rag, since they still CANNOT wipe the snot!

      Example, please.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 20 June 2020 11: 39
        0
        Syrian conflict, p.zh.s.
  7. zwlad
    zwlad 19 June 2020 08: 20
    +4
    The user was clearly going to demonstrate how the US fighter aircraft is developing amid the fact that Russia has the same Tu-95s in service.

    He is simply saddened by the fact that their own aircraft industry has been trying for ten years to create a fighter for a successful fight against the Tu-95, but it doesn’t work out.
  8. Doccor18
    Doccor18 19 June 2020 08: 22
    +7
    Western users tried to ridicule the Russian Tu-95 after another interception over Alaska

    And the B-52 do not want to make fun of? They are the same age.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 19 June 2020 08: 52
      +3
      No. The last B-52 was built in 1962. And the Tu-95MS was produced from the beginning of the 80s as far as I remember ...
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 19 June 2020 09: 12
        +1
        They began to operate both types from 1955-1956.
        1. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener 19 June 2020 09: 36
          +6
          This is true. But the production of the B-52 was discontinued in 1962. And the most "fresh" aircraft is 58 years old. And the Tu-95MS, although it has the same name as the Tu-95 of the same age as the B-52, but began to be produced in 1981. It was created on the basis of the Tu-142. And judging by the comments of members of the forum who are familiar with this type of aircraft, with the fact that it took off in the distant 1955, it has not so much in common.
        2. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 19 June 2020 09: 42
          +1
          So what?!
          All Tu-95MS flying now are built in the 80s, flying Tu-142 from the late 70s.
        3. 5-9
          5-9 19 June 2020 09: 53
          +4
          Tu-95MS is the oldest - 1983 release. And they have the newest 1968 release ... or 1962 ....
          1. Cyril G ...
            Cyril G ... 19 June 2020 10: 26
            +2
            62nd year latest
            1. 5-9
              5-9 19 June 2020 11: 26
              0
              Then, in general, 21 years old ....
            2. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 19 June 2020 18: 49
              -1
              Quote: Cyril G ...

              62nd year latest

              Not bad preserved.
  9. Sonmaster
    Sonmaster 19 June 2020 08: 31
    12
    Personally, this photo collage I am only proud of our TU.
    He survived all .. and survived these.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 19 June 2020 08: 39
      +5
      Quote: Sonmaster
      Survived all

      Duncan MacLeod in Aviation! hi
      1. Sonmaster
        Sonmaster 19 June 2020 08: 54
        +7
        This plane was terrifying to the parents of these mockingbirds.
        And it will also keep them on the "watch" for a long time. hi
  10. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 19 June 2020 08: 44
    +3
    And there in the half of the photo is not Tu-142 a case?
    1. figwam
      figwam 19 June 2020 08: 55
      +2
      Quote: VIK1711
      And there in the half of the photo is not Tu-142 a case?

      All Tu-142
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 19 June 2020 09: 36
        +2
        Quote: figvam
        Quote: VIK1711
        And there in the half of the photo is not Tu-142 a case?

        All Tu-142

        You are mistaken. Not Tu-142, but Tu-95RC.
        1. ancient
          ancient 19 June 2020 10: 51
          +1
          Quote: Piramidon
          You are mistaken. Not Tu-142, but Tu-95RC.

          More precisely will be - and Tu-142 and Tu-95RC.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 19 June 2020 11: 22
            +3
            Quote: ancient
            More precisely will be - and Tu-142 and Tu-95RC.

            The photos are not very high-quality, but I did not see the Tu-142 there. Already such a characteristic attribute as the magnetometer fairing, in the upper part of the keel of the aircraft in such images should be visible. hi
            1. figwam
              figwam 19 June 2020 12: 10
              +1
              Quote: Piramidon
              You are mistaken. Not Tu-142, but Tu-95RC.

              Maybe so. Tu-142 is a modernization of the Tu-95RC, so they are very similar.
            2. ancient
              ancient 19 June 2020 12: 45
              +2
              Quote: Piramidon
              but I didn’t see the Tu-142 there. Already such a characteristic attribute as a magnetometer fairing, in the upper part of the keel of the aircraft in such images should be visible

              Taki yes ... but ... not all aircraft had it wink example:

              Tu-142 board number 01 aviation of the Russian Navy, Knevichi airfield (Vladivostok), 21.08.1994
              These are the last 6 machines (ed. "VP" produced by the Kuibyshev plant) hi
              1. faridg7
                faridg7 20 June 2020 15: 00
                +2
                Oh yo, there I am somewhere in the crowd
  11. ioan-e
    ioan-e 19 June 2020 08: 47
    +3
    They would have ridiculed their B-52, fools!
  12. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 19 June 2020 09: 03
    -5
    One "tried to make fun of", and second "was going to demonstrate"?
    All?
    Ну и что?
    I beg your pardon, but this "news" is not worth a dead fly.
    hi
    1. Maks1995
      Maks1995 19 June 2020 09: 13
      +4
      But Omerikanskaya !!!

      Not "tried to make fun of", but made fun of.

      But in fact, the news is an eaten egg about anonymous anonymous
  13. 5-9
    5-9 19 June 2020 09: 50
    +2
    Colapatriots need to know that the oldest Tu-95 is 15 years newer than the newest American missile carrier and carries missiles with twice the range .... such that no E-3 and KS-135 will be enough to detect it and refuel the F-22 so that intercept him ...
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 June 2020 10: 14
    +1
    Western users tried to make fun of Russian Tu-95
    We say that the one who laughs last laughs well. Therefore, American youngsters (and most of them in their accounts) should first look at their "irrelevant oldies" who have been puffing in the service since the 60s.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. Grabacr
    Grabacr 19 June 2020 10: 17
    -5
    I specifically looked at the original NORAD statement, where did you find the TU-95 mockery there? Plain collage, nothing more. No need to invent any political nonsense.
  16. PROXOR
    PROXOR 19 June 2020 10: 30
    +3
    The sound of the 95th / 142 is incomparable. It is clear why he was nicknamed the bear. Bassy, ​​seemingly awkward. But at the time of the attack of the 95th, in principle, nothing will save, as well as from a bear if it is already nearby. The old man is respected and respected, but still it's time to do the 160/2 version. 95e already burn up their resources.
  17. iouris
    iouris 19 June 2020 11: 12
    +1
    I liked the collage, so why worry: raise the F-22, tankers ...?
  18. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 19 June 2020 11: 13
    +1
    The user was clearly going to demonstrate how the US fighter aircraft is developing amid the fact that Russia has the same Tu-95 in service
    and the user is not aware of the date of creation of the B-52?
  19. K-50
    K-50 19 June 2020 11: 58
    0
    In the comments of Western users on the North American command post on social networks, a collage appeared with an attempt to ridicule Russian strategic aviation:

    Laugh, laugh, if only sobbing was not necessary. yes angry laughing
  20. imobile2008
    imobile2008 19 June 2020 12: 11
    -6
    There is nothing to rejoice about; there is no chance of reaching the drop point of the missiles. We need to come up with a new strategy, even with these aircraft there is a chance.
  21. Old26
    Old26 19 June 2020 12: 13
    0
    Quote: Hunter 2
    In order to cause "unacceptable" damage, the Tu-95 does not need to approach the US borders at 32 nautical miles ... missile range - 5500 km, X - 102 in the nuclear version, for some reason users who prefer to laugh - Forget about it !
    Normal Operation of Strategic Aviation!

    The fact that there is no need to approach is understandable. But do not forget that these CDs are subsonic and are not intended for the first strikes. Exclusively for "stripping"
  22. Artunis
    Artunis 19 June 2020 13: 41
    0
    I met this bear during the exercises in the 80th year - flying over us on a low-level flight - there was one desire: to dig deeper into the ground, it’s scary though!
  23. Mityasha
    Mityasha 19 June 2020 20: 11
    +1
    If they, bears, God forbid they work, then users of American aircraft and pilots of 5th generation aircraft will not even see where they arrived and the aircraft will stop working ...
  24. Freedim
    Freedim 19 June 2020 22: 08
    0
    And now let the Americans calculate the cost of departure and post-flight service for both groups.
  25. Bogatyrev
    Bogatyrev 19 June 2020 23: 23
    +1
    Yes, but this "irrelevant old man" may well launch quite topical X-102 missiles, and even more topical nuclear explosions will occur in actual and modern boys. Hence the question - why is this "old man" irrelevant? )))
  26. kig
    kig 20 June 2020 03: 42
    +1
    Interception TU-95 OVER ALASKA - so in the title. The adequacy of the writing fraternity below the plinth.
  27. Yury Siritsky
    Yury Siritsky 20 June 2020 11: 28
    0
    Look at your bearded ones before laughing at strangers.
  28. Kapkan
    Kapkan 20 June 2020 12: 51
    0
    It’s interesting that at least someone who defies the Tu-95 on a Western Internet understands that if you picked up airplanes to intercept this old man - YOU'RE LATE !? Is it their opinion that? Fighter?
  29. Andrey Krasnoyarsky
    Andrey Krasnoyarsky 20 June 2020 13: 25
    0
    Oh, those couch American military analysts! We have planes - wow! And the Russians - ah and oh. Oh well. In 1939, French couch observers also ridiculed the German aircraft industry, saying that the French had planes and all other weapons - wow! And the Germans - oh and ah. Indeed, the French only had 12 types of fighters, while the Germans had only two. But then came May 1940 and the "backward" Germans in just a month crushed the "advanced" French army to smithereens. So the one who shoots accurately, and not the one who has three pistols, laughs well.
  30. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 20 June 2020 17: 04
    0
    As far as I remember, the oldest Tu-95MS is younger than the youngest B-52. This time.
    And two - this as a smirk: "F-22 Raptors, with the support of Stratotankers KC-135 and the E-3 airborne warning and control system, successfully carried out two intercepts of Russian bombers entering the Alaska air defense identification zone." - this is how you see 2 Fu-22s hanging on the filling rods of the Sratotankers. Like a pendant weapon laughing
  31. AKS-U
    AKS-U 21 June 2020 01: 29
    +1
    - "In American social media accounts, they added that" Russia continues to raise its "irrelevant oldies" into the air.
    And what is wrong here. "The first prototype of the T-95 made its maiden flight on November 12, 1952, test pilot - A.D. Flight". It's good that it still flies. Made during the "harmful fairy tale" (according to Putin). Now there is no personnel, no capacity, and there is no desire. We'd better build Temples. It works better here.
  32. AKS-U
    AKS-U 21 June 2020 01: 36
    +1
    A Russian bomber from the 50s managed to escape from American radars.
    Russian strategic Tu-95 bombers turned out to be too inconspicuous targets for American air defense systems, as evidenced by the fact that F-22 fighters had to be lifted to escort these Russian airborne planes, moreover, almost at the very American borders.
    How exactly the Russian Tu-95 managed to avoid detection by American radars is still unknown, however, experts do not exclude two main versions - the low efficiency of US air defense systems and the use of certain special technologies by Russian aircraft, which made it possible to hide the presence of radar.
    Read more at: https://avia.pro/news/drevnie-rossiyskie-tu-95-skrylis-ot-amerikanskih-radarov-i-byli-zamecheny-tolko-u-granic-ssha.
  33. Archon
    Archon 21 June 2020 06: 44
    0
    Perhaps it makes sense to make an unmanned imitation of a bomber out of plywood, plant a dummy and send it to the "patrol", and let potential people spend the resource of cars and burn fuel.
  34. The comment was deleted.