Military Review

China: the battle began after an armed border violation by the Indian military

53
China: the battle began after an armed border violation by the Indian military

Certain details of the clash between the Indian and Chinese military in the border region of Ladakh continue to come from India and China.


Recall that during the battle killed at least two dozen people on both sides. At the same time, the parties used various types of weapons.
The clash began at night on June 16 in the Galvan Valley. The Chinese side accuses the Indian of armed violation of the state border of the PRC in two directions, as a result of which the battle ensued. At the same time, in China, official data on victims, for their part, is not provided. New Delhi uses this fact to blame China for being the first to fire the Chinese military.

At the same time, in India they say that no “crossing the Chinese border” by the Indian military was allowed.

The whole problem is that the Ladakh region is a disputed territory. For example, it includes the territory of Aksaychin, which Beijing considers to be an integral part of the PRC. But they don’t think so in New Delhi. And the appearance of the Indian military in the area of ​​Lake Pangong, the Chinese troops could regard as a violation of the state border.

However, Indian soldiers do not appear in this area for the first time. Activity began to increase after China began to deploy military equipment at the airport 200 km from the border. In India, they announced a violation of the agreements, which provide that only border guards can be in the designated zone. But this did not affect China. Then India decided to begin the transfer of forces and assets, including Tanks.

The list of the dead Indian military presents ANI services:



Zhang Shuili (representative of the Western command of the PLA):

There was a direct armed conflict, as a result of which there are victims. The Indian military invaded Chinese territory in the Galvan Valley, which, of course, was regarded as illegal action by the Indian side.

And China decided to respond harshly. This rigidity was commented on today at the UN. The Secretary General of the organization, Antoniu Gutterisch, said that the parties should immediately sit down at the negotiating table, since the nuclear powers should understand their responsibility for the further escalation of the conflict. The UN voiced calls for an urgent convocation of the Security Council.

UN Press Secretariat:

We take note of reports that the two countries have made efforts to mitigate the situation.

Meanwhile, an information campaign has begun in India, in which the military is called for "more decisive action." In an interview with one of the TV channels, the father of the deceased Indian military states that his son “accepted martyrdom for his homeland” and that he still had children who are now ready to defend the country:

Photos used:
Indian Defense Ministry, ANI
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. V1er
    V1er 17 June 2020 13: 52 New
    +2
    And today I read the news that they ceased fire and concluded a temporary truce.
    Foreign Ministers of China and India agree to resolve the situation on the border
    1. Threaded screw
      Threaded screw 17 June 2020 13: 59 New
      +5
      and made a temporary truce.
      Another
      1. Valery Valery
        Valery Valery 18 June 2020 13: 37 New
        +1
        Question: who will win the war between India and China ?!
        Answer: USA! and a little bit of UK.
    2. Far B
      Far B 17 June 2020 14: 01 New
      +1
      Generally looks pretty stupid. A piece of the Himalayas, where besides the musk oxen there is nobody to graze. It's worth it? Or show off more than life? Well, they would introduce a joint pasture, with an international of shepherds
      1. venik
        venik 17 June 2020 17: 06 New
        11
        Quote: Far In
        A piece of the Himalayas, where besides the musk oxen there is nobody to graze. It's worth it?

        ========
        There is a strategic highway connecting China with Pakistan nearby, and along the territory that was once torn away from India .....
        Here is somewhere such a story ..... request
      2. illi
        illi 17 June 2020 18: 25 New
        +7
        And here is the disputed territory. Here the question is completely different. Give in to the small and they will eat you.
        The whole world now lives according to the laws of the jungle.
        So yes the show-off is more expensive, disputed territories, and life.
      3. krillon
        krillon 17 June 2020 22: 15 New
        -1
        Well, we had Damansky. Given today. Was he worth protecting him? So they argue like that.
        1. Alex1949
          Alex1949 18 June 2020 13: 35 New
          -3
          Soviet troops occupied the island of Daman illegally, because ours stupidly signed an incorrectly drawn up border treaty. According to the agreement of that time, the border was supposed to pass along the main channel of the Amur. But Amur took and changed the main channel and, in fact and formally, Damansky Island automatically appeared on the territory of China. Therefore, they gave it away when they realized their mistake. And if you talk like you, then why do we need land beyond the Urals. Almost the entire population of Russia lives up to the Urals (inclusive). The Chinese still draw the territory of China to the Urals. Why do we need to protect these empty lands. Reasoning according to yours, you need to give almost everything that is beyond the Urals to the Chinese.
          1. krillon
            krillon 20 June 2020 22: 54 New
            0
            The Soviet Union did not argue that way. It is in a democratic Russia "understood their mistake." Tell someone that China gave a mistake?
      4. vlad106
        vlad106 18 June 2020 17: 22 New
        0
        Quote: Far In
        Generally looks pretty stupid. A piece of the Himalayas, where besides the musk oxen there is nobody to graze. It's worth it? Or show off more than life? Well, they would introduce a joint pasture, with an international of shepherds

        Future superpowers are growing up.
        in this case there was a small “muscle game"
    3. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 17 June 2020 15: 39 New
      +5
      So purchases of Russian weapons and military equipment will increase, possibly significantly.
    4. Maz
      Maz 18 June 2020 16: 54 New
      0
      The main question: who benefits from the further unwinding of the incident? Neither India nor China has come to a war. And experience in a big war and resources - the cat wept. Favorable first of all the USA and NATO and others like them. Pakistan is also there somewhere. War is armaments, supplies, supplies first of all.
  2. svp67
    svp67 17 June 2020 13: 54 New
    +4
    In an interview with one of the TV channels, the father of the deceased Indian military states that his son “accepted a martyrdom for his homeland” and that he still has children who are now ready to defend the country:
    A very alarming sign, especially if the fathers of those killed in China now "speak" ... The parties are not ready to put up.
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 17 June 2020 14: 28 New
      +4
      Quote: svp67
      try on

      Reconcile. From the word "world".
      1. svp67
        svp67 17 June 2020 15: 55 New
        +4
        Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
        Reconcile. From the word "world".

        This is not visible, but for now only "are trying on"
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 17 June 2020 21: 19 New
          -1
          Quote: svp67
          A very troubling sign

          The dragon is waving its tail. It is crowded in the Celestial Empire, the CCP made a wise decision to compare with the US Army by 2050. The stage of this formation is the strategy of its use in the buffer, border countries. So where the next thunder will strike, they will decide in the Chinese Politburo
    2. Boris Chernikov
      Boris Chernikov 17 June 2020 21: 38 New
      +1
      and there will be no peace, it’s politics, they will measure themselves by shots until they get bored .. then they disperse and say that they won ..
  3. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 17 June 2020 14: 00 New
    -8
    This was expected from the fascist government of Modi, which is losing support and inciting religious and territorial conflicts. As you can see, a visit to Trump in Delhi did not go without a result.
    1. Zorro21
      Zorro21 17 June 2020 14: 14 New
      +5
      Quote: Kostadinov
      A visit to Trump in Delhi did not go without result.

      Especially striking is the synchronism of these events with the exacerbation on the Korean peninsula. Obviously the hand of one conductor.
    2. Normal ok
      Normal ok 17 June 2020 17: 42 New
      +9
      Quote: Kostadinov
      This was expected from the fascist government of Modi, which is losing support and inciting religious and territorial conflicts. As you can see, a visit to Trump in Delhi did not go without a result.

      Are the Chinese peaceful lambs? They pursue expansionist policies throughout the world. Somewhere with the help of bribery (Africa), somewhere with the help of military supplies and trade (Middle East) and somewhere and directly arranging armed provocations (Asia). Almost all of their neighbors know that you can expect any tricks from China.
  4. shubin
    shubin 17 June 2020 14: 08 New
    +3
    Meanwhile, an information campaign has begun in India, in which the military is called for "more decisive action."

    For Bollywood, there is no end to work.
  5. Galleon
    Galleon 17 June 2020 14: 12 New
    -3
    Well, here is the manifestation of Indian-American friendship: "the first to invade ...". Until we were friends, we lived peacefully. And then it went: Pakistan, China ...
    Oh well them ... There will be no continuation. Like with Pakistan.
  6. Prahlad
    Prahlad 17 June 2020 14: 12 New
    -4
    Well and good! Let them at least arrange a massacre there. Ran for popcorn
  7. yehat2
    yehat2 17 June 2020 14: 16 New
    +3
    India has a cheerful situation - in the west disputes with Pakistan, in the east with China, in the south disputes with small Britain, in the southeast - with neighbors, in the southwest Somali lads give heat not without the support of the Arabs. Resources around the perimeter are actively squeezed by China, Japan and other Asians.
    I still have 3 American bases nearby, which nifiga are not friends.
    Therefore, with the development of industry and profitable foreign trade problems.
    1. Sergey Valov
      Sergey Valov 17 June 2020 16: 39 New
      +5
      China has “friendly” Japan in the east, Taiwan has no less “friendly” in the southeast, which the USA actively supports. No less fun company.
      1. Normal ok
        Normal ok 17 June 2020 17: 45 New
        +3
        Quote: Sergey Valov
        China has “friendly” Japan in the east, Taiwan has no less “friendly” in the southeast, which the USA actively supports. No less fun company.

        All of China’s neighbors are “on their knives” because China considers their territories to be their “original” lands (including the Far East) and their population as their vassals.
        1. Usher
          Usher 17 June 2020 20: 33 New
          +3
          Quote: Normal ok
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          China has “friendly” Japan in the east, Taiwan has no less “friendly” in the southeast, which the USA actively supports. No less fun company.

          All of China’s neighbors are “on their knives” because China considers their territories to be their “original” lands (including the Far East) and their population as their vassals.

          Can I proof on the "original" lands of the Far East? I have many friends living in China, I asked about this. They say this is a myth.
      2. yehat2
        yehat2 17 June 2020 20: 36 New
        0
        Well, China can deal with all its neighbors now, unlike India
        moreover, in his position it is quite advantageous not to rush into harsh events and continue to spud all Southeast Asian trade. This is the same mistake that the 2nd Reich made in the year 14 - it climbed when you just had to continue to accumulate strength.
  8. Tuzik
    Tuzik 17 June 2020 15: 44 New
    0
    like they say there was a melee, with stones and sticks, without the use of weapons
    1. knn54
      knn54 17 June 2020 21: 03 New
      +1
      Both sides passed the level of the third world war and "in the fourth world war there will be nothing to fight except with stones and sticks" ...
      According to Einstein, however.
    2. Revolver
      Revolver 18 June 2020 06: 32 New
      0
      Quote: Tuzik
      like they say there was a melee, with stones and sticks, without the use of weapons

      Sticks have not yet been used, only fists and improvised (or rather, running) stones. Sticks it will be an escalation.
  9. 501Legion
    501Legion 17 June 2020 15: 56 New
    +1
    here 99% what exactly China is driving the situation. they have been acting impudently lately
  10. Whirlwind
    Whirlwind 17 June 2020 16: 23 New
    0
    Look to whom in the world today it is profitable to "divide and conquer" ...
  11. Old Horseradish
    Old Horseradish 17 June 2020 17: 02 New
    -2
    Chinas, as always, lie.
  12. Old Horseradish
    Old Horseradish 17 June 2020 17: 04 New
    0
    Helmet of our killed border guard on Damansky island.
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 17 June 2020 17: 12 New
      0
      And where now, that Damansky, along with part of the Great Usurian? ("nullified" knows) ....
      1. Zeev
        Zeev zeev 17 June 2020 17: 22 New
        +5
        Damansky was abandoned by Soviet border guards back in 1969. Officially, it became Chinese in 1991, after signing the border treaty between the USSR and the PRC.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 17 June 2020 18: 29 New
      -4
      Well, you provocateur, horseradish old. GPU is not on you.
      1. Snail N9
        Snail N9 17 June 2020 20: 36 New
        +1
        And what about the part of the Greater Usuri, with the island of Tarabarov and other islands and lands with a total area of ​​337 sq km, "quietly" transferred to China in 2005?
        http://president-sovet.ru/members/blogs/post/2489/
        But this is so, flowers, now they have come up with a new method of trading territories-TORs. And amendments to the constitution. just prepared the appropriate ones to make it more convenient, and most importantly legal, to do demarcations and delimitations ...
  13. pytar
    pytar 17 June 2020 17: 30 New
    -1
    The Chinas are completely insolent. Crawled across all angles! Hang around the perimeter like rats bite around the territory! negative
    1. Usher
      Usher 17 June 2020 20: 35 New
      -3
      And what? Are you going to ban them?
  14. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 17 June 2020 18: 25 New
    0
    The Secretary General of the organization, Antoniu Gutterisch, said that the parties should immediately sit down at the negotiating table, since the nuclear powers should understand their responsibility for the further escalation of the conflict.


    And when these impotents from the United Nations strangle the DPRK nuclear power, which is not going to attack anyone, what are they thinking?
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 18 June 2020 06: 34 New
      -1
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      DPRK's nuclear power, which is not going to attack anyone

      And South Koreans are not sure. And why? recourse
      1. Coward
        Coward 18 June 2020 07: 03 New
        0
        Maybe from the fact that they themselves provoke the DPRK? Arranging exercises near the border, launching balloons with leaflets and leading propaganda propaganda through loudspeakers.
  15. Sergey39
    Sergey39 17 June 2020 18: 45 New
    -6
    Right now the USA will cease to control the whole world and there will be more and more such local conflicts.
    1. AllXVahhaB
      AllXVahhaB 18 June 2020 14: 09 New
      0
      Quote: Sergey39
      Right now the USA will cease to control the whole world and there will be more and more such local conflicts.

      Or maybe the other way around? How was it before? There was a conflict, a military clash, someone won, a peace treaty was signed and they lived on. Now, these local conflicts last forever !!!
  16. Karaul73
    Karaul73 17 June 2020 19: 09 New
    +3
    Quote: Far In
    Generally looks pretty stupid. A piece of the Himalayas, where besides the musk oxen there is nobody to graze. It's worth it? Or show off more than life? Well, they would introduce a joint pasture, with an international of shepherds

    Land must not be given! The Kuril Islands can show someone an unnecessary piece of land. But this is not so !?
  17. SovietUnit
    SovietUnit 18 June 2020 06: 16 New
    -3
    China decided to organize a small victorious war, for the moral suppression of Taiwan and Hongkog. However, our Vedic Hindu brothers will fight back! Chinese armored will feel the power of the T90!
  18. Signore Tomato
    Signore Tomato 18 June 2020 12: 23 New
    0
    Quote: Galleon
    Well, here is the manifestation of Indian-American friendship: "the first to invade ...". Until we were friends, we lived peacefully. And then it went: Pakistan, China ...
    Oh well them ... There will be no continuation. Like with Pakistan.


    And it’s easy and simple to arrange a provocation. It is only necessary to "slightly" correct the signals from GPS satellites and the detachment of the Indian military, which was walking at night on GPS devices, unexpectedly (for itself) finds itself in foreign territory.
  19. Andrey Krasnoyarsky
    Andrey Krasnoyarsky 18 June 2020 14: 37 New
    +1
    Chinese media: Indian military illegally invaded Chinese territory. Indian media: Chinese military illegally invaded Indian territory. And who there actually invaded - the shaitan himself will not make out.
    1. d4rkmesa
      d4rkmesa 19 June 2020 10: 02 New
      0
      The Indians consider this territory their own, but, like part of Kashmir, it is controlled by China. In general, it is not very clear what they (Indians) need on the other side of the Himalayas. Or a koumiss from yak milk hit in the head?
  20. Grigory Kazakov
    Grigory Kazakov 19 June 2020 10: 39 New
    0
    Hrenase has a brood there. Well this is some kind of PC. Why does he need 8 children ????
  21. smart fellow
    smart fellow 19 June 2020 15: 24 New
    0
    "during the battle at least two dozen people on both sides died." Of these, 20 Indians.