Military Review

In Chinese Sohu, Iran was offered to drown American aircraft carriers

35

In the Chinese edition of Sohu, material was published that examined the likelihood of a direct military conflict between the United States and Iran. In particular, it is noted that “after the victory in the Cold War over the Soviet Union, the United States donned the mantle of world hegemon” and try to solve any issues with the help of economic and military pressure.


The Chinese author considers not only the deployed numerous military bases, but also aircraft carrier groups as the main striking force in regions remote from the United States. The article says that it was with the help of the AUG that the Americans at one time attacked Iraq, eventually turning the country into ruins.

From the material of the Chinese author, who offers to drown the American aircraft carriers:

Now, Iran can face the same problem. The Americans took their planes into the air from the aircraft carriers, they destroyed the important infrastructure of Iraq, the Iraqi Air Force could not take off from airfields. So what should Iran do if the United States decides to use military force against it? The best way is to drown the American aircraft carriers before they begin to rise. aviation.

Further, the author reflects on whether Iran has military means to destroy American aircraft carriers, and comes to the conclusion that Iran does not have such means today ...

From the article:

The huge 100 thousandth American aircraft carriers are reliably protected. AUGs have a powerful air defense system, anti-ballistic weapons. This is a real iron wall in the sea. A massive missile attack would help to sink the aircraft carrier, but Iran does not have enough missiles that could break through the air defense missile defense of the aircraft carrier group.

Where does the author get information that Iran does not have "enough" rockets, of course, he does not report.

In the end, the author, who himself actually offers Iran to drown the US Navy aircraft carriers, comes to the conclusion that if Iran tries to destroy an American warship, "in the end, the fate of this country will be even worse than the fate of Iraq." An interesting “logic” according to Sohu: in order for Iran not to be destroyed by the USA, it needs to sink American ships of American AUGs, but it cannot do this, which means that the country “will be destroyed anyway” ...

Comment by Xiao Cha:

So sell more weapons Iran
Photos used:
Facebook / USS Theodore Roosevelt
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parusnik
    parusnik 17 June 2020 08: 48 New
    +7
    Comment by user Xiao Cha: So sell more weapons to Iran
    .... It is logical smile
    1. Valery Valery
      Valery Valery 17 June 2020 09: 03 New
      18
      The Chinese are still those tricks .... They want to, but they are afraid (more precisely -ccyt!), But they are pushing others.
      1. New
        New Year day 17 June 2020 09: 34 New
        +8
        Quote: Valery Valery
        The Chinese are still those tricks .... They want to, but they are afraid (more precisely -ccyt!), But they are pushing others.

        laughing carrying chestnuts out of fire is always nice
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 17 June 2020 10: 08 New
          0
          Exactly!!! And they themselves.
      2. jovanni
        jovanni 17 June 2020 11: 07 New
        +4
        The usual Chinese strategy. As they have there: sit on the mountain and watch the tigers fight. Only, the mountain seems to be not so high, and one, at least of the tigers, has very sharp claws ... Although so far it’s cowardly ...
        1. NIKN
          NIKN 17 June 2020 11: 12 New
          +4
          Sitting on the shore and waiting for the corpse of your enemy to pass by you
      3. venik
        venik 17 June 2020 17: 58 New
        0
        Quote: Valery Valery
        The Chinese are still those tricks .... They want to, but they are afraid (more precisely -ccyt!), But they are pushing others.

        ========
        So this is Eastern Wisdom! Sit calmly, do not scamper, do not twitch (you can of course "add oil to the fire" - it is not forbidden, but only slowly!) And past you carry the corpse your enemy! fellow
      4. Nemchinov Vl
        Nemchinov Vl 19 June 2020 05: 02 New
        0
        Quote: Valery Valery
        The Chinese are still those tricks ..
        like the author of this post / notes. winked support him, say - "nothing, but enchanting !!"... let him be pleased (!).
  2. Carnifexx
    Carnifexx 17 June 2020 08: 49 New
    0
    All for the sake of it:
    So sell more weapons to Iran
    And it may be about Chinese weapons, nevertheless they have anti-ship missiles (the question is still how accurate and effective). Are the Chinese little Pakistan?
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 17 June 2020 08: 58 New
      -4
      Why is it bad to get bases in Iran?
      In addition, Iran will soon begin to purchase weapons. He has not so many suppliers. China may turn out to be the main one. From the point of view of China, everything is logical.
      1. Dr. Frankenstucker
        Dr. Frankenstucker 17 June 2020 09: 44 New
        -1
        Quote: Pereira
        Why is it bad to get bases in Iran?


        Whose base is it? Who to get? What kind of nonsense?
        1. Pereira
          Pereira 17 June 2020 10: 58 New
          -1
          China, of course. Have you thought about whom?
          1. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 17 June 2020 12: 39 New
            +1
            Quote: Pereira
            Why is it bad to get bases in Iran?

            Quote: Dr. Frankenstucker

            Whose base is it? Who to get? What kind of nonsense?

            Quote: Pereira
            China, of course. Have you thought about whom?

            In Iran, the Constitution prohibits the deployment on its territory of military bases of foreign states. Based on this, the Iranians broke us off when the question arose about the deployment of our VKS in connection with participation in the Syrian problem. A couple of times they left their airfields and that was it.
            1. Duxan
              Duxan 17 June 2020 18: 21 New
              +1
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Based on this, the Iranians broke us off when the question arose about the deployment of our VKS in connection with participation in the Syrian problem. A couple of times they left their airfields and that was it.

              As far as I know, at the beginning of the Syrian operation, Iran offered its military airdromes to jump our VKS .. But we refused, fearing the howling and tantrums of Israel .. We did our best
              But China, of course, is encouraging, although it could help Iran and us with the presence of the Navy off the coast of Syria .. But something was cowardly, but in vain ..
    2. Insurgent
      Insurgent 17 June 2020 09: 05 New
      +5
      Quote: Carnifexx
      Are the Chinese little Pakistan?

      For a stable and growing economy, markets, there is not much.
      And besides, this geopolitics.
  3. Gate68
    Gate68 17 June 2020 08: 58 New
    +7
    The article is about nothing.
  4. mikula
    mikula 17 June 2020 09: 12 New
    +6
    It's so cute. And, why, China itself does not sink, an American aircraft carrier? Or are the residents of Tehran less valuable than the people of Beijing?
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 17 June 2020 09: 20 New
    +3
    The Chinese, after all, are still merchants ... attack, otherwise it will be bad for you ... but you have nothing ... however, we have a "sword-treasure", not at all expensive ... and you have cheap oil! Oops Circle closed laughing
  6. New
    New Year day 17 June 2020 09: 31 New
    +6
    Well done Chinese: drown aircraft carriers, which is ceremonial, and then there’s nothing! How so, got excited? Provocateur chinese
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 17 June 2020 10: 06 New
      -3
      Well, nothing? There is something.
      Iran has created a new anti-ship ballistic missile with a range of 700 km. This, as reported by RIA Novosti, said the brigadier general of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Amir Ali Hajizadeh said.
      "To date, we have managed to produce a ballistic missile, which is not a cruise ship and whose technology is complex in itself," the agency quoted him as saying.

      He added that from the coast, missiles are capable of hitting ships at a distance of 700 km.

      https://flot.com/2018/312922/
  7. Dr. Frankenstucker
    Dr. Frankenstucker 17 June 2020 09: 51 New
    +2
    The number of military analytics has increased significantly. As I understand it, bankrupt shopkeepers and fired hairdressers have dramatically become network geopolitics and experts in military matters. Against the backdrop of this puberty delirium, even the imagination of National Interest seems to be analytics.
    I don’t understand why VO gets dirty publishing this dense snowstorm?
    1. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 17 June 2020 10: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Dr. Frankenstucker
      I don’t understand why VO gets dirty publishing this dense snowstorm?

      Why understand?
      The Military Review website requires authors in the news department.

      The author has harnessed himself to "plow" and plows with sweat. To your health! Who does not like, can not eat and, accordingly, do not twist ... request
      "VO" - the platform is large, you can easily find a dish to taste. hi
  8. Avior
    Avior 17 June 2020 09: 56 New
    -1
    The best way is to drown the American aircraft carriers before the aircraft begins to rise from them.

    Iran’s very clever Chinese council is the first to start a war with the United States. You can’t imagine smarter.
  9. north 2
    north 2 17 June 2020 10: 02 New
    +3
    Iran is no longer an independent state than China. At least take how many years Iran has already been under American sanctions, but still pursue a policy that is exactly what Iran needs. AND
    it remains to be seen how China would have looked if China and America and the EU imposed as much sanctions as Iran did. So China has nothing to teach Iran, let alone provoke.
  10. ApJlekuHo
    ApJlekuHo 17 June 2020 10: 19 New
    +1
    An interesting “logic” according to Sohu: in order for Iran not to be destroyed by the USA, it needs to sink American ships of American AUGs, but it cannot do this, which means that the country “will be destroyed anyway” ...

    Interactive logic, spread this nonsense in the form of news. Prepare a better script for the theater of the absurd.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 17 June 2020 10: 45 New
    0
    In the Chinese edition of Sohu, material was published that examined the likelihood of a direct military conflict between the United States and Iran.
    Sohu at the time to start writing about the likelihood of a conflict between the United States and China. Or, according to Freud, are Americans better distracted by a military conflict with Iran and forget about China for a while? A kind of complacency, because still scary.
  12. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 17 June 2020 10: 48 New
    +1
    The article says that it was with the help of the AUG that the Americans at one time attacked Iraq, eventually turning the country into ruins.

    Well yes. Surely an afftir-nugget "from the plow" has seen enough of a cool movie, such as "Hot Heads"

    But
    https://topwar.ru/40888-burya-v-pustyne-udar-palubnoy-aviacii.html
  13. pardonov
    pardonov 17 June 2020 10: 57 New
    0
    Quote: Valery Valery
    The Chinese are still those tricks .... They want to, but they are afraid (more precisely -ccyt!), But they are pushing others.

    Bullshit with the states with China, trillions of dollars worth of trade, why should they destroy the chicken that lays the golden eggs less patriotism more logic
  14. Junior Private
    Junior Private 17 June 2020 11: 09 New
    +1
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    seen enough of a cool movie, such as "Hot Heads"

    I remember. "If it is impossible to destroy the main target, we bomb the secondary ones: the pantomime art school and the accordion factory."
  15. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 17 June 2020 11: 18 New
    0
    Repeat the American ship before it starts shooting ... that's cool.
  16. Tugarin
    Tugarin 17 June 2020 11: 38 New
    +3
    We decided to throw firewood, and then the beginning to fade.
  17. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 17 June 2020 13: 16 New
    +2
    Oh, you still didn’t read “Evening Berendeevsk” and “The Truth of Novodupinsk”. There still will not give such advice!
  18. Pandiurin
    Pandiurin 17 June 2020 13: 26 New
    +1
    Quote: parusnik
    Comment by user Xiao Cha: So sell more weapons to Iran
    .... It is logical smile


    Not only logical but also beneficial.
    The embargo on offensive arms to Iran expires on October 18, 2020.

    In four months, Iran will not be able to solve the problem on its own,
    but to prepare, sign and pay the contract with China, if done quickly, then you can have time to get weapons this year.

    Do not look in this article for anything anti-American is purely business)
  19. cheburator
    cheburator 17 June 2020 15: 33 New
    -2
    Iran does not, but we do! If what, we can help! We are Russians, God is with us!
  20. Old26
    Old26 17 June 2020 23: 43 New
    +2
    Quote: cheburator
    Iran does not, but we do! If what, we can help! We are Russians, God is with us!

    Does Russia need this?