General spoke about the training complex "Adjutant"

The head of the military air defense of the RF Armed Forces in an interview with the National Defense magazine spoke about the development of the latest target complex. According to Lieutenant General Alexander Leonov, such a complex is being developed by specialists of the Izhevsk Electromechanical Plant Kupol.

We are talking about a universal training complex, which is called "Adjutant."

Lieutenant General Leonov in an interview "National Defense noted that the MTK (target training complex "Adjutant" has already been put to state tests. "Adjutant" has the ability to reproduce the enemy’s actions in airspace. With its help, the calculations of air defense systems can be trained in actions against targets of various kinds. It also allows you to assess the quality actions of the military personnel of the air defense air defense systems of the tactical and operational levels.

Adjutant has five types of targets: imitation of cruise missiles, various tactical means aviation, UAVs, fire support helicopters.

MTC “Adjutant” allows you to create a truly difficult target environment for calculating air defense systems, when up to 6 different air targets, including various ones, appear in the air simultaneously. These goals can be approached from different directions, at different heights and speeds.

A complex of this kind allows you to quickly respond to threats from the air in various conditions.

Previously, the Adjutant complex was tested in arctic conditions and showed excellent results. In particular, its capabilities to counter the so-called swarm are noted. drones.

Comments

[cat-begemot]

Yeah, five types, and listed 4. What is missing?

[Lexus]

Yeah, five types, and listed 4. What is missing?

Budget.

[Peter is not the first]

“Adjutant” has five types of targets: imitation of cruise missiles, various tactical aircraft, UAVs, fire support helicopters.

Eh, you do not understand military secrets.
Yesterday, the President revealed it a bit: Imitation of hypersonic missiles missed at a speed of 16 times more than existing ones.

[Civil]

An ancient cabinet with modern monitors, it’s clear that the main thing is the filling, but still funny)

[letinant]

Quote: Civil

An ancient cabinet with modern monitors, it’s clear that the main thing is the filling, but still funny)

You are clearly not familiar with past generation appliances. And the architecture of military equipment is different from civilian. Even in military equipment impact resistance is taken into account, i.e. the ability to continue to work the device after the explosion.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Civil

An ancient cabinet with modern monitors, it’s clear that the main thing is the filling, but still funny)

In the army, everything should be durable, even laptops made of cast iron.

[mvg]

Lamps again? What are such modern monitors? Again on Baikal? Quite “inexpensive”

[Region-25.rus]

Lamps (electronic), they are so different if that. During my ten years of practice, I have used both digital and tube radio equipment. If I had a Wolf-K tube receiver, then in telephone and telegraph modes I preferred to use it, and not, for example, "Brigantina" or "EKD". And the transmitters "Brig" or "Corvette" about UzhOs were also pawed, so they beat much stronger than transistor ones. The dimensions of the equipment are YES, more than that of digital ones. But even that equipment was of the 60s generation. And who prevents the use of modern developments in the production of the same electronic tubes?

[mvg]

Wolf-K tube receiver

You compare music and performance. I have a couple of friends who still prefer lamps. They even buy two mono to make stereo. The last bzik, given that the high-end hardware is already a dozen generations ahead. But here we are talking about performance and competent software. Why make these billboards / stands from the 60s? To put matrices in the middle of 2000, to inhale the “Russian” elemental base, the level of the same year? However, she is still missing. Many things are imported. I saw these domestic computers at 200 K rubles for state employees. Not everything is Russian there.

[letinant]

Quote: mvg

Lamps again? What are such modern monitors? Again on Baikal? Quite “inexpensive”

Show in this photo tube appliances.

[mvg]

Counter question, show the modern ones, in the yard 2020. This is a training and training console, why do it in retro style? As close to combat. There is nothing to be proud of.

[letinant]

Quote: mvg

Counter question, show the modern ones, in the yard 2020. This is a training and training console, why do it in retro style? As close to combat. There is nothing to be proud of.

I repeat once again, the architecture of military devices is different, due to the difference in tasks. Civilian, created to be bought, military so that it performs tasks. A lot of information should be displayed by pressing the 1st, maximum 2 buttons. Applying only through the keyboard, this is not possible. This is home you can buy computers with LEDs shimmering in different colors. In military equipment, I have to see if the mode is on or not. And I want to ask what shape the device should be in order to become modern?

[mvg]

I should see if the mode is on or not

As Korean gamers click 600 times a mouse / min, they monitor a bunch of information on the screen, or two. Many programmers work on a pair of monitors. The keyboard allows you to switch modes. These guys also go to the army. This is progress, or something. The simulated situations do not have to be repeated every time anew; algorithms for solving them must be standard. UAV operators are sitting at such remotes or still with a joystick in their hand.
The comp should tell you if you follow, as there are in the article, 6 goals, if you forget something. How will you fight when the UAV becomes not 5-6, but 25, plus it releases the load.
PS: This is for MRK in the warhead-2 you have 2 buttons "with gas" and "without", and four anti-ship missiles. You won’t let it out anymore. And if you have 16/24 TPK, and you need to determine priority goals, make launches. Threats are growing, but you don’t have enough buttons on the remote control) and information on these miracle matrices? We live the day before yesterday.

[letinant]

Quote: mvg

I should see if the mode is on or not

As Korean gamers click 600 times a mouse / min, they monitor a bunch of information on the screen, or two. Many programmers work on a pair of monitors. The keyboard allows you to switch modes. These guys also go to the army. This is progress, or something. The simulated situations do not have to be repeated every time anew; algorithms for solving them must be standard. UAV operators are sitting at such remotes or still with a joystick in their hand.
The comp should tell you if you follow, as there are in the article, 6 goals, if you forget something. How will you fight when the UAV becomes not 5-6, but 25, plus it releases the load.
PS: This is for MRK in the warhead-2 you have 2 buttons "with gas" and "without", and four anti-ship missiles. You won’t let it out anymore. And if you have 16/24 TPK, and you need to determine priority goals, make launches. Threats are growing, but you don’t have enough buttons on the remote control) and information on these miracle matrices? We live the day before yesterday.

You do not know nefina. Repeat all the time, it should be. UAVs are controlled by TWO people. The first is responsible for the flight, the second for the reconnaissance system, or weapons (these are large UAVs, reconnaissance, strike). The tactical link is automatic. At the devices we have are not KOREAN PROGRAMMERS, not programmers at all. And you still did not answer what shape and color a military device should be to suit you?

[Interlocutor]

Counter question, show the modern ones, in the yard 2020. This is a training and training console, why do it in retro style? As close to combat. There is nothing to be proud of.

Yes, because it has visually such dimensions in the car. And it’s important for the operator to react and work in a familiar environment. And what kind of hardware will be behind the dashboard - who knows ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: mvg

Lamps again?

Where?!

[rocket757]

It’s like with an airplane, it is flying or not !!!
The simulator provides high-quality, comprehensive training for operators or not. Question - answer, nothing more.

[mvg]

high-quality, full training

This thing should simulate situations, suggest the right solutions, suggest options. And the characteristics are not so hot. Regarding the training of operators .. can be seen in the conflicts in Georgia, Syria, Lebanon. Somehow not very.

[rocket757]

Quote: mvg

Regarding the training of operators .. can be seen in the conflicts in Georgia, Syria, Lebanon. Somehow not very.

Seriously said so? Have you ever encountered that contingent of students?
If there were, then you had no questions b.
Suppose, let’s say, in the minke whales the simulators are the most, the coolest ... and what is the result?

[Ingenegr]

Previously, the Adjutant complex was tested in arctic conditions and showed excellent results. In particular, its capabilities to counter the so-called swarm of drones are noted.

This is how the mixed complex will counteract a swarm of drones?

[_Ugene_]

Previously, the Adjutant complex was tested in arctic conditions and showed excellent results. In particular, its capabilities to counter the so-called swarm of drones are noted.

I don’t understand how a training complex can withstand something?