Military Review

Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

109

The American army will no longer support other countries and solve "foreign conflicts", now the main task of the US military is to defend and decisively protect the United States from external enemies. This statement was made by US President Donald Trump.


Speaking to West Point Academy before graduates, Trump said the United States is "ending the era of endless war." According to him, the responsibility of the US army does not include "resolving ancient conflicts in distant lands that many people have not even heard of."

We are ending the era of endless wars

- Trump quoted the media as saying.

The American leader said that the United States "are not the police of the world," but he did not specify when and where Washington is going to withdraw the military.

We are not cops of this world. But let our enemies know that if our people are in danger, we will never, never, hesitate. And when we fight, from now on we will fight only in order to defeat

- declared Trump.

Recall that at the moment it is known about the intention to withdraw part of the US military from the territory of Germany, as well as Afghanistan and Iraq. In this case, the exact number of troops withdrawn is not reported.
Photos used:
Twitter / Donald Trump
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Terenin
    Terenin 13 June 2020 20: 18 New
    25
    Trump: We are not the cops of this world. But let our enemies know ...

    Sing, swallow, sing ... winked
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 13 June 2020 20: 47 New
      22
      Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

      Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 13 June 2020 20: 52 New
        +5
        Quote: Tatiana
        Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

        Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!

        Trump will definitely not be re-elected, the speeches are not "patriotic" .. The dollar will end so quickly .. Then drug trafficking came to the military-industrial complex and political influence will disappear as soon as everyone returns home .. I generally don’t believe ..
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 13 June 2020 21: 06 New
          +2
          Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

          Trump’s speech can also be understood as a willingness to solve American national interests abroad in the form of PROXY wars, which Washington, in principle, has always been involved in most of.
          1. mvg
            mvg 13 June 2020 21: 43 New
            +4
            Lord Tatyana .... Maybe, as advised? Closer to the soup
          2. Hagen
            Hagen 13 June 2020 22: 10 New
            +1
            Quote: Tatiana
            Trump's speech can also be understood as a willingness to solve American national interests abroad in the form of PROXY wars

            Trump need not be understood at all. In essence, he did not promise anything, and those intentions that he expressed can be clarified within a couple of days to "the other way around" (there were precedents). There is a Nuclear Posture Review prepared by the military in collaboration with the Department of Energy. The review is a strategy for the development of American nuclear forces and describes the possible circumstances of their use. But it can be "corrected" in the right direction at any moment. So you don't even need to focus on these ritual speeches. Ivanka will cry in a naphthalene vest, and Donald will begin to move his fleets, the soap dish on the sink. And only the promise of the GDP to drown / shoot down all sources of "fire" against the Russian contingents make a correction to its movements, and even then until the first hesitancy shown.
      2. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 13 June 2020 21: 27 New
        +9
        Quote: Tatiana
        Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!

        Smoke veil, IMHO. "So, they will rob ..." Without robbery, these ... will not be able to do anything. And how to rob if there are no troops at hand ... In Syria, without any hesitation - oil - here, the troops guard it ... ISIS? What is ISIS? Oil flows past your pocket!
        1. poquello
          poquello 13 June 2020 22: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Smoke veil, IMHO. "So, they will rob ..." Without robbery, these ... will not be able to do anything.

          whatever he says, the US has an interesting dilemma - on the one hand, it is necessary to reduce costs, and on the other, increase the bribe, as if the opposite vectors
        2. Doctor
          Doctor 13 June 2020 22: 56 New
          -1
          ISIS? What is ISIS?

          IG they won. More from his speech:

          In recent years, American soldiers have made clear the elimination of the high threat to the American people. ISIL's wild caliphate was 100 percent destroyed during the Trump administration, and its barbarian leader al-Baghdadi disappeared, killed, ended. And the number one terrorist in the world, Kassem Soleimani, is also dead.
        3. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis 14 June 2020 09: 52 New
          0
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Smoke veil, IMHO. "So, they will rob ..." Without robbery, these ... will not be able to do anything. And how to rob if there are no troops at hand ...

          So will appear under Venezuela .... The conflict is not ancient, oil again ...
      3. Doctor
        Doctor 13 June 2020 21: 42 New
        +5
        Long ago isolationists did not come to power in the USA ...

        The fundamental rule of conduct for us in relations with foreign states is the development of our trade relations with them with the least possible political ties.
        Since we already have obligations, let us fulfill them, showing goodwill in full. But let's stop here.
        Europe has determined for itself a number of primary interests, which either do not concern us or are very distantly related to us. Therefore, she has to get involved in frequent conflicts, the causes of which, in fact, are far from our concerns. Therefore, it is unreasonable for us to associate ourselves with artificial bonds with the mediocre vicissitudes of her politics or with the equally mediocre conflicts of her friendly or hostile relations.
        Our geographically remote location allows us to take a different course.


        George Washington - Farewell Message.
        1. Knell wardenheart
          Knell wardenheart 13 June 2020 23: 06 New
          +3
          And I think this is not completely isolationism. This is what is called "regroup" with the abandonment of tactical dead ends and dangerous ledges. The US understands that Europe is unwilling to donate as much to NATO as its economy allows. The United States understands that Turkey is no longer fully reliable as a NATO partner. The United States understands that their union has become huge and flabby, it began to eat their resources in different parts of the world and for different rubbish. They now have a problem - the rising China, which has put on the mask of a "merchant-goodness" and behind this mask is concretely building up its economic, political and military might. Consider that Trump is dumping ballast - in the long term, this is a challenge to regional players to disassemble this ballast in their sun's storerooms, and spend resources on this and fight each other, while the United States will skim the cream off this and calculate the moment of a new world conflict.
          1. Doctor
            Doctor 13 June 2020 23: 22 New
            +5
            spend resources on this and struggle with each other, while the United States will skim the cream and calculate the moment of a new world conflict.

            This is isolationism.
            After the collapse of the USSR, America can no longer make a profit under the banner of the leader of the fight against communism.
            They return to the pre-war strategy of fueling conflicts in Europe and Asia, and they themselves expect to sit across the ocean and weld on all sides.
            The scheme is worked out.
            1. Knell wardenheart
              Knell wardenheart 13 June 2020 23: 45 New
              +1
              by "not quite isolationism" I mean that yes, they will leave a number of directions, handing over their cards to regional leaders. However, it is unnecessary to expect them to return to their continent and live in the spirit of the "Monroe Doctrine". They have NATO, they have Britain and Europe - now this is their frontier, their "Western world", and they will not repeat their mistakes in distancing themselves from the affairs of these countries a la World War I / II.
              Turkey - yes, perhaps. Most of the BW, possibly Korea, Afghanistan, Ukraine in the future, perhaps even the Baltic states (although it's hard to believe) - these are areas where they will "reduce activity" as it seems to me.
              I see the US strategy in gradually expanding and strengthening the borders of its own world order so that the house stands with minimal strain on their part - this is such a calm and methodical approach to ideological capture of the planet by contrasting the effective order - chaos and less efficient order .
              1. Doctor
                Doctor 14 June 2020 00: 01 New
                +1
                they will not repeat their mistakes on distance from the affairs of these countries a la World War I / World War II.

                One mistake - underestimated the insanity of the Japanese.
                And so everything is clear, welded in both wars, overthrew the Britons, they themselves sat on the throne.
          2. ultra
            ultra 14 June 2020 20: 19 New
            0
            China is not a problem for the USA, but a sentence.
            1. Knell wardenheart
              Knell wardenheart 14 June 2020 20: 36 New
              0
              The United States has a much more favorable location than China, which is sandwiched by the seas, mountains and not very suitable territories and borders on Japan, India and the Russian Federation, each of which is generally a rather serious inconvenience for China’s ambitions without the United States.
              For all the massive antipathy towards the United States, I would beware of any positive or allied illusions about China. We may well be inside this scheme contrary to our benefits or desire ..
              1. ultra
                ultra 14 June 2020 23: 13 New
                0
                Personally, I have no illusions about China.
      4. sabakina
        sabakina 13 June 2020 21: 42 New
        +2
        Tatyana, let's not harness the cart in front of the horse. We’ll wait and shake, we won’t shake, so we won’t see. wink
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 13 June 2020 21: 58 New
          -2
          Quote: sabakina
          Tatyana, let's not harness the cart in front of the horse. We’ll wait and shake, we won’t shake, so we won’t see. wink

          Oh, Vyacheslav! Your soul is trusting!
          In Europe, the situation is such that Russia is not up to allegories! Russians do not have to openly hide their heads in the sand!
      5. Peter is not the first
        Peter is not the first 13 June 2020 22: 05 New
        +1
        Of course, Trump does not believe it, as well as other politicians. Moreover, there are no "alien" conflicts for America; they plan and provoke all conflicts.
      6. Egor-dis
        Egor-dis 14 June 2020 09: 29 New
        +1
        Quote: Tatiana
        Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!

        With tongue removed. I also thought so when I started reading. But then everything fell into place.
        Now the main task of the US military is to defend and decisively protect the United States from external enemies.
        And if the enemies are
        in distant lands that many people have not even heard of
        then, of course, it is necessary to send a fleet there, and, under the pretext of "protecting the devil", supporting the smallest "opposition", land a contingent there and build a base.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 14 June 2020 12: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: Egor-dis
          Now the main task of the US military is to defend and decisively protect the United States from external enemies.
          And if the enemies
          are in faraway lands that many people have not even heard of
          then, of course, it is necessary to send a fleet there, and, under the pretext of "protecting the devil", supporting the smallest "opposition", land a contingent there and build a base.

          That's right! Just before that special services of the USA quietly first create pro-American opposition in this distant country and a hot spot in the region there so that Washington could later openly protect its American national interests in the original PROXY war there.
      7. Vend
        Vend 15 June 2020 10: 57 New
        0
        Quote: Tatiana
        Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

        Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!

        Since the United States never resolved other people's conflicts, it voted only for its own interests in different territories.
    2. Shurik70
      Shurik70 13 June 2020 20: 48 New
      +4
      All.
      He will not be forgiven for this. This is a direct threat to reduce the US defense industry. If you do not meddle in all conflicts, then such an army is simply not needed. Accordingly, the industry supporting this army is not needed.
      1. Terenin
        Terenin 13 June 2020 20: 52 New
        +8
        Quote: Shurik70
        All.
        He will not be forgiven for this. This is a direct threat to reduce the US defense industry. If you do not meddle in all conflicts, then such an army is simply not needed. Accordingly, the industry supporting this army is not needed.

        A trumpet, a sparrow shot, he feels his electorate ... wink
        Yes, and he had no problems with "reverse" (reverse) winked
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 13 June 2020 21: 26 New
          +4
          Quote: Terenin
          Trampush, sparrow shot, he feels his electorate.

          hi
          Exactly - blah blah on the eve of the elections in opposition to opponents. Well, on the entire lawn in front of the White House, he announced the withdrawal of American troops from Europe, and 9,5 thousand went to the withdrawal, which most likely rotate, and 25 thousand remained. You can't take the red fox's word for it. As for the American electorate, only relatives are really worried about their men in uniform, and the rest of the public is bawdy and ignorant. And the main decisions of the United States are behind the shadow government, where these decisions are made on the basis of "money-money".
          1. Terenin
            Terenin 13 June 2020 21: 30 New
            +5
            Quote: Lelek
            Exactly - blah blah on the eve of the election to the peak of opponents.

            This is what we are talking about.
            hi
      2. BARKAS
        BARKAS 13 June 2020 20: 57 New
        +4
        He is at the military-industrial complex and works to protect his country will give more money than to protect other people's interests.
    3. janeck
      janeck 13 June 2020 20: 56 New
      +6
      I'm sorry .. but Trump, certainly not an agent of the FSB influence?
      1. opuonmed
        opuonmed 13 June 2020 21: 45 New
        -5
        he didn’t say anything, said a labsh to his ears! if someone looks at the interests of the United States then they will start a military war, and so on, that is, they don’t mention Che!
    4. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 13 June 2020 20: 59 New
      -1
      Ha .. USA and without gop stop - what will you live on? Something popped a lot on the sites of the United States of information in Latin America ... why?
    5. max702
      max702 13 June 2020 21: 43 New
      0
      Quote: Terenin
      Trump: We are not the cops of this world. But let our enemies know ...

      Sing, swallow, sing ... winked

      Yes, so he will definitely remain without the Nobel Peace ..
    6. Nemchinov Vl
      Nemchinov Vl 14 June 2020 00: 41 New
      0
      Quote: Terenin
      Trump: We not cops of this world. But let our enemies know ...

      Sing, swallow, sing.

      oh how "poked" black coup ?! Even in communication with the graduates of the Academy, it is better to disown the word “POLICE OFFICER” in advance ?! lol laughing (!)
      Otherwise, posters - "military lives matter" !! protests, and there is no one to protect the White House ?! winked
  2. Gladius
    Gladius 13 June 2020 20: 20 New
    +3
    If Democrats win, military conflicts around the world will unleash with renewed vigor.
    1. Sergey39
      Sergey39 13 June 2020 20: 28 New
      +3
      No matter who wins. The US military-industrial complex is the main engine of the economy. After the financial, which is on the verge of collapse.
  3. Doccor18
    Doccor18 13 June 2020 20: 21 New
    +3
    end the era of endless wars. " 

    Come on ... And where to put on the military-industrial complex? Where to spend $ hundreds of yards?
    According to him, the duties of the American army do not include "the resolution of ancient conflicts in distant countries, which many have not even heard of.

    Well, yes, with an American level of education, they don’t know anything about many countries. For them, that Iraq, that Iran, that Austria, that Australia ...
    1. Doctor
      Doctor 13 June 2020 22: 50 New
      0
      And what about the military-industrial complex?

      With the military-industrial complex, everything is clear. After the collapse of the USSR, they only went down.
      And with Trump, it went awry. More from his speech:

      To ensure that you have the best equipment and technology, my administration has embarked on a colossal re-establishment of the US military, a record achievement.

      After many years of crushing budget cuts and military spending that were completely exhausted by these endless wars, we invested more than $ 2 trillion; this is with the letter "T" - dollars into the most powerful fighting force on planet Earth.

      We are building hundreds of new ships, bombers, fighter jets and helicopters; new tanks, military satellites, missiles, even a hypersonic missile that runs 17 times faster than the fastest missile currently available in the world, and can hit a target at a distance of 1000 miles within 14 inches of the center point.

      For the first time in 70 years, we have created a new branch of the United States Armed Forces: Space Forces.
  4. knn54
    knn54 13 June 2020 20: 21 New
    +8
    -According to him, the duties of the American army do not include "the resolution of ancient conflicts in distant countries,
    If there is no oil, gas ...
  5. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 13 June 2020 20: 23 New
    0
    We are ending the era of endless wars
    - Trump quoted the media as saying.

    Kaneshna! A crow crowed ...
    And when we fight, from now on we will fight only in order to defeat

    And before, like, for fun hanging out. wassat
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 13 June 2020 20: 26 New
    +4
    The American army will no longer support other countries and solve "foreign conflicts", now the main task of the US military is to defend and decisively protect the United States from external enemies. This statement was made by US President Donald Trump.

    Is that sho? Is this his humor?
    Although, if you recall, they easily declare that to bomb anyone, anywhere, is the protection of American interests !!! So they just defend themselves !!!
    From this point of view and the facts, he did not joke at all, but interpreted his striped interes in a new interpretation!
    Ah yes maladtsa good
    In short, wait for the "guests" on the "wings of the world with hotels" !!!
    1. bayard
      bayard 13 June 2020 21: 03 New
      12
      Quote: rocket757
      Is that sho? Is this his humor?

      He is now not up to humor. Excluding even their monstrous domestic political problems, it can be seen with a naked eye that the United States cannot banally accumulate funds for the long overdue problem of rearmament of the army. They are currently armed with a lot of dilapidated trash - from armored vehicles and artillery to aviation (we look at the entire fleet as a whole), personnel training and increasing the salaries of military personnel (they have a terrible shortage of a whole line of specialists - from military pilots and technicians, to service specialists nuclear weapons).
      America really needs a respite - it overstrained and undermined its strength. She urgently needs to curtail most of her military bases abroad, and military activity in other people's conflicts - these are the expense items that eat up the lion's share of the military budget, leaving no funds for normal rearmament. And they have been talking about this in the USA for a long time.
      But.
      They cannot allocate ANOTHER more money than is already spent.
      Plus internal shocks and consequences of coronovirus hysteria ...
      So Trump decided to wave his saber.
      If he is not prevented from doing this, he will really begin to curtail his military presence abroad. How not to treat him, but he is really a patriot of his country, and is trying to do something for its benefit. If he succeeds, many will breathe a sigh of relief.
      1. ANDREY MIKHAILOV_2
        ANDREY MIKHAILOV_2 13 June 2020 21: 19 New
        0
        Clear and understandable. good good
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 13 June 2020 21: 48 New
        -1
        Quote: bayard
        He is now not up to humor.

        I agree that THIS PRESIDENT is not funny, only there are others who have started everything ... They are not sorry to burn their own, do you think they will go out into the world when / if they win, they will do good / bright deeds ???
        Quote: bayard
        The USA cannot banally accumulate funds for the long overdue problem of rearmament of the army.

        It is quite enough for them that they already have, in order to demolish many, to spoil a lot where. Winning is not necessary, the main thing is to kindle a fire !!! In this they are masters.
        Quote: bayard
        America really needs a break

        You go to Congress with this idea ... the departure will be faster than your own cries.
        Quote: bayard
        They cannot allocate ANOTHER more money than is already spent.

        HA, HA, HA, go to the Fed reserve or the same congress with this ... the result is predictable.
        Quote: bayard
        So Trump decided to wave his saber.

        Everything is according to Stanislavsky ... I DO NOT BELIEVE!
        Not to the president himself, by the way, but to the fact that he himself does not understand that no one will allow him to do this!
        Quote: bayard
        How not to treat him, but he is really a patriot of his country, and is trying to do something for its benefit.

        But I believe that. Moreover, I believe that he would be able to return the stripes a lot of what they have lost .... I respect, but since their return to former greatness, this is a problem for us and others, he really does not want to wish for victory.
        Their SYSTEM, WANTES will not change in any way and never, they are ENEMY and may they be weaker.
        1. bayard
          bayard 13 June 2020 22: 21 New
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          Their SYSTEM, WANTES will not change in any way and never, they are ENEMY and may they be weaker.

          Quite rightly - they are our enemy, and the enemy should weaken. yes
          But.
          I completely disagree that we don’t need to wish Trump victory in his internal political struggle. As long as Trump is in power, this struggle will only increase. smile When and if he wins this fight, America will be completely different from what it was before, and this is in our favor. But it is also useful to us as a counterweight to China. I would really not like to be left alone with him in our present state - after the collapse and collapse of the United States, about which their (American) politicians are already prophesying.
          Trump wants to confront China. yes And he does not hide it.
          Great . fellow
          In this confrontation, he willy-nilly will have to establish relations with us, because he cannot resist both of us.
          He understands this very VERY.
          And this must be used. bully
          And about:
          Quote: rocket757
          Everything is according to Stanislavsky ... I DO NOT BELIEVE!
          Not to the president himself, by the way, but to the fact that he himself does not understand that no one will allow him to do this!

          look at the first sentences of my comment.
          Their inner struggle is in our favor.
          Trump in power in the US is in our favor.
          The reduction of the US military presence abroad and the refusal to participate in alien conflicts for the USA are in our favor.
          And after all, he is already taking steps - troops begin to withdraw from Germany - 9,5 thousand. There are 25 bayonets left.
          But the death of the United States and the collapse of Trump in the near term, I would not want.
          Because of the same China.
          They NEED each other.

          But if the enemies defeat him (Trump), it will be noticeably more difficult for us.

          So let it be more difficult for our enemies and "partners" than for us.
          drinks
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 13 June 2020 22: 47 New
            0
            Quote: bayard
            And after all, he is already taking steps - troops begin to withdraw from Germany - 9,5 thousand. There are 25 bayonets left.

            Do not repeat this nonsense after someone ... they have a CONTRACT, 25 thousand permanent bayonets, 9,5 thousand is extra. in anticipation of the exercises, this is NOT REDUCTION, but equalization of numbers, additional rations have removed all business ...
            I will not argue, prove, persuade ... I do not want.
            There is a lot of controversy, there is something that is not at all tudes, not syuds ... the general message is correct - a strong, treacherous ENEMY lurks behind the okane, and the rest is no longer important.
      3. certero
        certero 13 June 2020 23: 31 New
        +4
        Quote: bayard
        but he is really a patriot of his country,

        Trump may be treated differently, but he is such a fucking politician that he is trying to keep his campaign promises. Imagine what impudence :).
  7. Ravik
    Ravik 13 June 2020 20: 28 New
    0
    A horse will eat a haystack?
    She will eat, but who will give her ...
  8. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 13 June 2020 20: 28 New
    +1
    laughing ..But I have a Confederate cap. I will wear it. wassat
  9. Sergey39
    Sergey39 13 June 2020 20: 30 New
    +2
    Refuse to wage wars that they themselves unleashed? It's hard to believe. If only circumstances force.
  10. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 13 June 2020 20: 41 New
    +2
    Theoretically, very correct words.
    I specifically googled how many military conflicts are currently taking place in the world and lost count - forty, at least!
    What years ago was less. Are we degrading? Getting more aggressive? Where this world is heading.
    It used to be easier - here is your hearth, your home, your homeland. No need to protect political interests on the globe. Maximum, one war ...
    1. Doctor
      Doctor 13 June 2020 22: 13 New
      +1
      I specifically googled how many military conflicts are currently taking place in the world and lost count - forty, at least!

      And how many of them are directly involved in the US Army?
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 13 June 2020 22: 16 New
        -2
        I am in the fin USA. Russia, at least four, although not officially. I'm lying. They were invited to Syria.
        1. Doctor
          Doctor 13 June 2020 22: 18 New
          0
          I am in the fin USA. Russia, at least four, although not officially. I'm lying. They were invited to Syria.

          What are we talking about. Who will rake Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, etc. when will the USA leave?
          And at whose expense. Guess with 3 times.
          1. The leader of the Redskins
            The leader of the Redskins 13 June 2020 22: 28 New
            -1
            Come on! Great rakers! God forbid to sort out your manure, and you have swung right on a global scale ... Not that box office, now!
            1. Doctor
              Doctor 13 June 2020 22: 43 New
              +1
              Come on! Great rakers! God forbid to sort out your manure, and you have swung right on a global scale ... Not that box office, now!

              And who will restore it?


              Americans? They are not going to. Trump in this speech also said this:

              Each of you begins your career in the army at a crucial moment in American history. We are returning the fundamental principles that the work of an American soldier consists not to rebuild foreign states, but to protect our country from foreign enemies.
              1. The leader of the Redskins
                The leader of the Redskins 13 June 2020 22: 59 New
                -7
                I don't think ours will either. They will throw a "piece" of several million greenery, send construction battalions several houses and a couple of bridges to restore and trumpet the whole world about gratuitous aid. An example is Italy with its coronavirus.
              2. Ruslan67
                Ruslan67 13 June 2020 23: 39 New
                -2
                Quote: Arzt
                And who will restore it?

                But why? what
                1. Doctor
                  Doctor 13 June 2020 23: 51 New
                  0
                  But why?

                  So they will say: “The Russians came, they bombed everything and left.”
        2. Simsimal
          Simsimal 13 June 2020 22: 57 New
          -2
          laughing
          They also invited to Afghanistan in 1979, is there a difference?
          Only at first Amin banged. And invited later.
  11. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 13 June 2020 20: 54 New
    +9
    "The American army will no longer support other countries and resolve" foreign conflicts "...
    In the first part of this statement, I think Polyakov has questions winked - how will it not support?
    And in the second part, Ukraine - how will it not resolve other people's conflicts? laughing
  12. businessv
    businessv 13 June 2020 21: 04 New
    -1
    At the moment, it is known about the intention to withdraw part of the American military from the territory of Germany, as well as Afghanistan and Iraq. In this case, the exact number of troops withdrawn is not reported.
    Another cheap show off! For this Twitter lover, the main thing is to say, and there - even though the grass does not grow! Who will come from whom ?! Who will let you do this? And money? A cut? Is taking resources almost for nothing? And where to put these warriors at home ?! And so it’s after gunfights, then grenade launchers, but the warriors will return home and what will they do? Who will give them work? What can they do? In addition to these questions, there is also a bunch that the military will ask Pope Trump.
  13. Andobor
    Andobor 13 June 2020 21: 06 New
    -4
    Well done Trampushka, it’s not in vain that Putin appointed him President of America,
    - if he could really do something.
  14. AB
    AB 13 June 2020 21: 12 New
    -2
    It’s ridiculous. In this, all over the world, at least someone can believe. I think no.
  15. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 13 June 2020 21: 15 New
    +6
    "Trump announced the refusal of the United States to resolve" foreign military conflicts "
    Dear you are my man! .. Let me kiss you!
    After all, here is the correct muzchina! .. And escho said, Trump is not ours! .. And he just, and get the village tractor! ..
  16. Shuttle
    Shuttle 13 June 2020 21: 15 New
    -3
    We are ending the era of endless wars

    If he really thinks so and at least does something for this, then alas, his days are numbered, and fate is not enviable. Because the actual holders of power in the United States, i.e. the largest financial and industrial bourgeoisie will never want to lose such a greasy and juicy, ever-renewing and therefore almost endless source of superprofits as a state defense program. Moreover, not only American, but also practically NATO-vskaya and a little more. You can’t take and deprive normal boys of their feeders like this.
  17. ANDREY MIKHAILOV_2
    ANDREY MIKHAILOV_2 13 June 2020 21: 16 New
    -3
    I would like to believe. But the US military lobby will simply blow Trump out of the president’s chair.
  18. Aleksandre
    Aleksandre 13 June 2020 21: 20 New
    0
    "We are not solving them, we are just starting." Donnie said.
  19. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 13 June 2020 21: 28 New
    +1
    We have not yet divorced, but our cohabitation is now at a lower level than before. Judging by their dialogs, someone is underpaying someone for cohabiting. laughing And where will these soldiers go? Will they be transferred to other military bases? Or will they be returned to the USA and fired? If the latter option, then in the US there will be more unemployed who can handle weapons. laughing


    .
  20. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 13 June 2020 21: 32 New
    0
    Did someone call them to resolve other people's conflicts? what
    1. DEVIL LIFE`S
      DEVIL LIFE`S 13 June 2020 21: 45 New
      +1
      Yes, Qatar and KSA in 1991
  21. Guazdilla
    Guazdilla 13 June 2020 21: 37 New
    0
    Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

    Is he a carbonarius and a freethinker?
    It's a shame, annoying, okay.
    No, come back Trampush, I forgive everything.
    Well, he’s crap, come on?
    No, something definitely needs to be done with China.
    Bastards, absolutely no living from them.
    They said well you do not get along with these crooks.


    Okay, well, maybe only in Star Wars. Well a little! .....
  22. Prisoner
    Prisoner 13 June 2020 21: 42 New
    +1
    Yeah. I would solve my problems.
  23. opuonmed
    opuonmed 13 June 2020 21: 43 New
    -2
    I don’t believe it! Any interest in the United States can become a war if in another country someone takes away interest, then they are leading the military, that is, nothing will change!
  24. DEVIL LIFE`S
    DEVIL LIFE`S 13 June 2020 21: 44 New
    +3
    Well, just a man saazal flattery. What graduates wanted to hear.
  25. opuonmed
    opuonmed 13 June 2020 21: 57 New
    +1
    he directly said what interests would fight and interests the whole world!
    1. DEVIL LIFE`S
      DEVIL LIFE`S 14 June 2020 12: 13 New
      0
      These are Obama's words, emnip
  26. veritas
    veritas 13 June 2020 22: 02 New
    +3
    Trump said the US refuses to resolve "foreign military conflicts"

    If they are not beneficial to the United States. He forgot to add or deliberately kept silent.
  27. APASUS
    APASUS 13 June 2020 22: 08 New
    0
    It is on bayonets that the power of the dollar rests!
    Trump mixed up causes and effects?
  28. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 13 June 2020 22: 12 New
    0
    That sounds great. It’s a pity that this will not happen during my life. Although I’m going to live for at least another 20 years. wassat
  29. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 13 June 2020 22: 15 New
    0
    There will be no roof for free .. laughing
  30. Operator
    Operator 13 June 2020 22: 16 New
    0
    American Spring's first bonus, however bully
  31. Wedmak
    Wedmak 13 June 2020 22: 52 New
    0
    Yes laaad ????? Will you stop stealing oil too?
    1. DEVIL LIFE`S
      DEVIL LIFE`S 14 June 2020 12: 15 New
      0
      They have nowhere to put their own shale.
  32. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 13 June 2020 22: 56 New
    -1
    Trump is a big rubbish and a populist, do not wait for any revolution behind these words. As a maximum, he outlined what is already happening - the United States is leaving regions where the geopolitical benefits of their stay are less than the costs. This, together with the withdrawal from the nuclear weapons treaties, marks a parting with the legacy of the Cold War - America says - guys, regional leaders - drag the strap and rake, and we need to prepare for a serious game and for the return of the former authority of the flagship of the Western world. A step back - two forward, so they imagine it.
  33. Holgerton
    Holgerton 13 June 2020 22: 58 New
    0
    Fresh giving, but hard to believe ...
  34. saygon66
    saygon66 13 June 2020 23: 09 New
    +1
    - Probably worth asking: And who will stay there, where will the States leave?
    - For whatever purpose they are "there" - they are stepping on .... some unpleasant, but very aggressive figures ... It can be argued that the States and started this whole mess, and fish in troubled waters ... so be it. But! Who will put things in order there after they leave? Local authorities? And who is in authority on the ground?
    - When the last American dumps home and closes the door tightly behind them - and it is easier for them to do this, we will all be faced with very unfriendly neighbors from the East, in whose hands there will be an inexhaustible source of income. And with whom we have not had the most warm relations lately.
    - And when this happens, will we have enough money to pay off or ammunition to fight back?
    - So, experiencing children's joy over the failures of the United States, it is worth asking yourself these and many other questions, is not it? bully
    1. Shiden
      Shiden 14 June 2020 13: 54 New
      0
      Well, at least one commentator posed the question of what’s next. And then a fun life will begin in Central Asia. And I’m sure all this fun will be raked by Russia. China, as usual, will wash its hands by building a second Chinese wall. Iran will give money, weapons, CASIR to the Shiite tribes of Afghanistan to secure the eastern borders.
      1. saygon66
        saygon66 14 June 2020 17: 53 New
        0
        - To me, current international relations very much remind me of the once-beloved fist game "all-for-all" ...
        - There, if someone fell from their hooves - the fight did not stop, no one shook hands, didn’t apologize ... The batch continued until the last soldier, who was often riddled so that the whole prize for the tablets went away .... smile
  35. domashniy domovoy
    domashniy domovoy 13 June 2020 23: 11 New
    -4
    A man said a man did.
  36. Aleks2000
    Aleks2000 13 June 2020 23: 17 New
    0
    Without context, the article does not understand anything.
  37. doubovitski
    doubovitski 13 June 2020 23: 26 New
    -1
    As always, this t vari says one thing, does another.
  38. Pandiurin
    Pandiurin 13 June 2020 23: 44 New
    +2
    Quote: domashniy domovoy
    A man said a man did.

    Well, like in stores when they promise 50% discounts. You look at the old price tag of 10, and the new one is only 5.

    It will be the same to withdraw troops. At first it will triple, and then, with fanfare, it will “halve”. Then he thinks a little and temporarily triples again)

    With Germany, they wrote above that they deduce 9.5 thousand and leave 25 thousand. True, under a contract with Germany there is a permanent minimum of just 25 thousand. And those that deduce, as it were, over time, did not end up somewhere in Poland or Romania.
    And it turns out that it seems like Trump promised the contingents are reducing, but in fact for some reason they are becoming more and closer to our borders.
  39. iouris
    iouris 13 June 2020 23: 54 New
    +1
    This means that Trump nationalizes all military conflicts.
  40. faterdom
    faterdom 14 June 2020 00: 02 New
    +1
    What's the matter?
    But the fact is that the entire infrastructure of the Pentagon and the intelligence community, and the geography of the deployment of bases, the incitement of conflicts are sharpened under the control of the main oil and gas producing and transit regions. And it was profitable, very profitable.
    And now, and in the future - no.
    Moreover, here is Nord Stream-2, there is Power of Siberia, in terms of gas, Novatek in the Arctic, Maduro won, does not leave in any way, China with its embankments significantly expands its zone of influence on the routes from the Persian Gulf, besides, it hurts the roads to Pakistan ...
    At the same time, the price of oil makes us suffer huge losses as a producer. And according to common sense, to keep puffing up, to waste huge amounts of money and resources for the sake of this task forty years ago - is actually really ruinous.
    Only, probably, it’s too late for America already, just printing 6 trillion this year alone is a corkscrew of the financial system, even if the whole world calls it, say ... restoration, correction or some other nonsense.
  41. riwas
    riwas 14 June 2020 04: 22 New
    +2
    The American army will no longer support other countries and resolve "other people's conflicts

    So there is no such country and such a conflict, wherever there are US interests.
    1. Karl
      Karl 14 June 2020 08: 39 New
      -2
      Quote: riwas
      The American army will no longer support other countries and resolve "other people's conflicts

      So there is no such country and such a conflict, wherever there are US interests.

      So they live !!! Something I don't believe in Trump, although most likely, it will increase the "payment for protection" .. In Kiev and the Baltic states, Russophobes and others must have become sad ..
  42. pexotinec
    pexotinec 14 June 2020 04: 22 New
    +2
    He would have fantastic novels to write.
  43. Serhio Dias_2
    Serhio Dias_2 14 June 2020 04: 34 New
    0
    Little by little they are blown away and this cannot but rejoice.
    And of course about wars, he is disingenuous - their economy is so arranged that without wars it is impossible.
  44. Ura Orlov
    Ura Orlov 14 June 2020 06: 02 New
    0
    They are plotting something big, their military budget is only growing. It seems that biological laboratories in foreign countries have not been removed, no base has been closed, tanks are arriving in Europe.
  45. Zomanus
    Zomanus 14 June 2020 06: 15 New
    0
    Yes, well ... Really, the money for the defense industry has run out.
    Or maybe the strength is not enough to capture everyone and everyone?
    They will soon have to strain to keep their own.
  46. Ros 56
    Ros 56 14 June 2020 07: 58 New
    0
    Savage Bandera, wind on a mustache. negative
  47. Sergey Novitsky
    Sergey Novitsky 14 June 2020 08: 27 New
    0
    "The tradition is fresh, but hard to believe."
  48. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 14 June 2020 09: 24 New
    0
    From the strategic point of view, the 5th Reich is now in a difficult situation - an internal perimeter has appeared. That is how the 1st Reich died. laughing
  49. APASUS
    APASUS 14 June 2020 09: 39 New
    0
    If the United States really changes its policy, then how will the countries freebies and beggars live? Is it necessary for the Baltic states to work?
  50. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 14 June 2020 10: 14 New
    0
    ***

    The USA has sworn ...

    Yes it hurt the puddle was good ...

    ***