Media: Russia will capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO because of trump

Russia will be able to capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO not in 60 hours, but much faster, since the US is withdrawing part of its forces from German territory. About it writes Forbes.

According to the author of the article, David Ex, the intentions of US President Donald Trump to withdraw part of the American contingent from Germany will hit NATO’s defenses against Russia and will give the Russian army the opportunity to capture Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, and also to defeat the alliance in less than 60 hours, but faster.

According to the author, the withdrawal of 9,5 thousand US troops from the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany will "cross out" all the efforts of NATO that the alliance has made over the years in "confrontation with Russia."

In his statement, he draws on the conclusion of Western analysts who predict the likely invasion of the Russian army precisely in the Baltic states, as NATO’s weakest and most vulnerable flank.

The author writes that at present in Europe the total number of the American military contingent is 34,5 thousand people. However, even such a quantity of forces of the USA and NATO is not able to repulse the sudden attack of Russia on the Baltic. At the same time, he refers to computer modeling conducted in 2016. According to him, the Russian army quickly and easily “crushes” NATO forces, capturing the Baltic states in 60 hours.

Now, after Trump made the decision to withdraw another 9,5 thousand American troops from Germany, Russia will need even less time to defeat the alliance, the author laments.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

Media: Russia will capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO because of trump

SMRAD, as always, are ready to cut out tonsils to readers through ZPO.

[x.andvlad]

This nonsense is calculated, as always, to strengthen public opinion about the indispensability of the United States for Europe, and at the same time the fear of catching up with the "Baltic kids", whatever they decide to look towards Russia.

[Civil]

Why capture the Baltic states I do not understand:
1. There are no resources.
2. There is no access to the sea, all the same, the Danish straits are closed.
3. There is no threat.
4. Hostile population.
5. Conflict with NATO.
6. We can’t offer anything alternative to the local rich population. We would have to maintain our own population.

[Pessimist22]

The girl wants to get married, but nobody takes her

[tacet]

At the expense of the rich population - by

[hhhhhhh]

"rich" population. Well pinned the Balts. From wealth they go to a foreign land to farm))))

[Vol4ara]

Quote: Civil

Why capture the Baltic states I do not understand:
1. There are no resources.
2. There is no access to the sea, all the same, the Danish straits are closed.
3. There is no threat.
4. Hostile population.
5. Conflict with NATO.
6. We can’t offer anything alternative to the local rich population. We would have to maintain our own population.

We bought them in cash from the Swedes so we got freedom, but where is Vasya’s money, with interest?
Well, the road to Kaliningrad.
What kind of independence can one talk about in relation to so dependent, weak, small countries. They are pseudo-independent while it is beneficial to the West. Purely hypothetically imagine that the United States burned out in the war with China, and the United Kingdom began to butt with France and Germany, someone will care about the Baltic states? How many hours will their independence last?

[Pavel57]

To capture, then to contain? Once such an experiment was done.
You can capture for the sake of:
--resources - they are especially not there;
- for the sake of territory - I’d like to master my own.

Unless for the sake of historical justice - nevertheless, money was paid for part of the Baltic states at one time.

[Marconi41]

Quote: Civil

Why capture the Baltic states I do not understand:

What do you mean why?! To ensure the Kaliningrad region in a threatening period. The Psheks are claiming it, and in general, NATO Kaliningrad is in the way, so the Baltic states are under our steadfast gaze.

[Shkworen]

Well, we type can do this, we have imperial ambitions, but why do we need this, no one is interested :)

[yehat2]

the local population is far from rich. All Baltic countries live on subsidies from the EU.
And, by the way, Poland is not very happy with this, because support for the Balts is cut off for her.

[Threaded screw]

Do we need her? Even if Trump asks.

[novel66]

yes she failed !! enough is enough

[Threaded screw]

yes she failed !!

Even Satan forgot about the Baltic states, but Forbes will never calm down.

[novel66]

even satan forgot

here it hurts them!

[adena]

To this groan, as well as to the similar cries of pro-balts, there is always one and the same question: Why do you need Russia? Why the hell did you capture? ...... for 29 years there has been no answer to this question.

[HAM]

Another hairpin to Trump .... smoked, drank, wrote ...

[Docx2032]

Have to capture, since they write

"- It comes out, so the state is meeting halfway? - he said gloomily. - Provides help to the tenants? Well, thanks. Now, then, as we wish, we will do it!"

And, hiding the policy under his shirt, Pryakhin retired to his room. His words instilled such fear that no one slept in Raven's Settlement that night. Dunya tied things into knots, and the rest of the wanderers scattered to spend the night on acquaintances. In the afternoon, everyone watched each other and took the property out of the house in parts.

Everything was clear. The house was doomed. He could not help but burn out. And, indeed, at twelve o'clock in the morning he burst into flames, set on fire from six ends at once. "

[Mountain shooter]

Who needs her to capture her? The Baltic states are simply "cut off" in a few hours, and we will divide Poland with Germany ... we will agree. Germans will remind Poles of the "civilized" resettlement of the German population from East Prussia. And we will not interfere ...

[Alex_You]

And what about Koenigsberg?

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Alex_You

what is it with kenigsberg?

He is in history - old Kant took with him.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Alex_You

And what about Koenigsberg?

And this is a deep splinter in the Polish w ...! Let it stick out there ...

[rotmistr60]

Russia will be able to capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO not in 60 hours, but much faster

And before they were given 72 hours or more. But what's the difference, since according to Forbes it turns out all the same kirdyk. While "crying" about the withdrawal of part of American troops from Germany, the authors did not think about the elementary question - are the Americans ready to fight for the Baltic states? The Baltic states, Poland and even Ukraine (Georgia has already been burned) are somehow confident that the Americans will lay down with bones defending their scrawny ones. In vain.

[helmi8]

Quote: rotmistr60

the authors did not think about an elementary question - are it the Americans who are ready to fight for the Baltic states?

The question is different - is the Baltic States of Russia needed to capture it?

[rotmistr60]

You asked an exclusively rhetorical question. Of course not needed. But perhaps the conversation is about the fact that representatives of NATO, and not Russia, are constantly discussing this issue. There is a difference?

[Boris55]

The goal of any war is the capture of energy, natural and human resources.

All of this we have in abundance incl. there is no reason for starting a war on our part. But there are plenty of such reasons for them. Then why such articles accusing us of aggression? To hide your true intentions towards us. The Western people are waving, we are not, but we must be prepared to repel their aggression. We are obliged to the memory of our ancestors and to future generations that we tell them which country we will leave - the country of slaves or the country of free people, who will have the right to decide for themselves how to live.

[Doccor18]

Russia will be able to capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO not in 60 hours, but much faster ...

They talk about it so often, as if they want someone to capture them.

[Tagan]

Quote: Threaded Screw

Do we need her? Even if Trump asks.

It is necessary or not, we will decide later. But Trump in the form of a useful idiot is still useful)))

[Wolf]

Both Forbes and David Ax work for the deep power of the United States and for globalists. This article is written for low intelligence. What Russia to capture and the Baltic States and Poland and the West. Europe? Who needs the potentiation of the war threat of Rus? It is only by this that NATO controls that would justify the existence of a terrorist zolinochka of the NATO military organization! In essence, is NATO beginning to be an independent military force in the hands of globalists, or is it an aspiration to make an ego completely independent organization?

[Tagan]

Quote: Doccor18

Russia will be able to capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO not in 60 hours, but much faster ...

They talk about it so often, as if they want someone to capture them.

Rather, to have raped

[gridasov]

Yes, all literate people have long understood that they are making a hostile image of a monster from Russia. But since the literacy of the population is declining, these aspects can be manipulated precisely by opponents of Russia.

[Tagan]

Quote: Doccor18

Russia will be able to capture the Baltic states and defeat NATO not in 60 hours, but much faster ...

They talk about it so often, as if they want someone to capture them.

Yes, you see, it seems that the fact is that, according to the laws of the genre, the time for receiving the snot has arrived, as has happened cyclically before. And they are subconsciously ready for this. Yes, and understand that they have long earned on nuts. Tumaki are late and partners are nervous

[ZaharoFF]

If briefly in relation to the Baltic states, then this:
Two cowboys are sitting and drinking whiskey. Suddenly, someone rushes along the street at great speed, scorching in all directions from pistols. One cowboy to another:
- Bill?
- Yes, Harry?
- What was it, Bill?
- It was Elusive Joe, Harry.
“Why is his name Elusive Joe, Bill?”
“Because no one can catch him, Harry.”
“Why can't anyone catch him, Bill?”
- because he's on nobody needs it, Harry.

[Ravil_Asnafovich]

Chesslovo, like little children who are scared by a granny.

[KVU-NSVD]

According to the author, the withdrawal of 9,5 thousand US troops from the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany will "cross out" all the efforts of NATO that the alliance has made over the years in "confrontation with Russia."

House of Cards directly, is it worth to withdraw approximately the division and everything will collapse? Then there are questions to the NATO system and where they spend money ..

[north 2]

The first and main question is whether Russia needs this Baltic States today. The very Baltic States, which for fifty years as part of the USSR sat on subsidies from the Russian SSR, and then the first of the USSR republics became independent for free and without calculations, for this Russia not only did not thank, but also became a nest of Russophobia and a den of enemies of Russia . With obvious desires, that maybe Russia could fall apart anyway and this Baltic will also get something from this pie. Well, if she doesn’t fall apart. then maybe the battalions of these Baltic states will help America, Ukraine and Poland defeat the Russian army. Despite the fact that now this Baltic is a beggar, like a church mouse.
The second question is, if during the restoration of the Russian Empire the Baltic states that have crept in on their knees will be attached on their knees, then only without repeating Stalin’s mistake after World War II. Then Stalin did not criminally abolish these Soviet Republics and even allowed them to have their own parliaments. If Stalin then abolished all these Republics and instead of them would create provinces and these provinces would be included in the Russian SSR, then the Russian Empire would still exist within the borders of the USSR in 1945.
The third question is the misfortune that Russia declared itself the successor of the USSR, but the Bolsheviks of the USSR did not declare themselves the successors of the Russian Empire. I'm here about what is still valid
Nistadt Peace Treaty, according to which Emperor Peter the First is Estonia and Livonia
I bought for 56 tons of silver, which amounted to more than two million Yefimki. So it’s been paid for everything long ago. The fourth question is the question - how from atheism inculcated by the Bolsheviks atheism of Russia suffering
to recreate the Empire, because the Emperor is God’s anointed and approved ruler of the state, and the Empire is the only way of the existence of Russia, which history and generations of ancestors pass from batches to centuries from century to century ...

[yehat2]

Politics is the art of the possible. If Stalin made the republic, then it was impossible in a different way.
And it was not he who made the mistake, but the petty bourgeois party of the Soviet Union, created from the AUCPB Khrushchev.
Instead of gradually leveling the national question, introducing common standards, Ukraine, the Baltic states and Georgia were actively made special and richer. It was these republics that received subsidies at the expense of other republics. And it was they who became the main haters of the USSR after the collapse.
Georgia received 5 times more budget than it produced. Balts on average about 2-3 times.
And in the RSFSR there were no resources for the normal provision of the population’s supply (it was required to increase about 40% of the expenses under this item) and it gave almost twice as much as it did - about 45%
If returns were reduced to 15-20%, and investments were distributed at least fraternally, many problems of outright poverty would gradually leave the RSFSR - in about 20 years. Funds would appear for full-fledged infrastructure and supply, no one would need an American chewing gum or jeans.
Why be surprised now?
For almost half a century, the Baltic states and especially Ukraine have accumulated gigantic investments in their infrastructure, industry and consumption at the expense of the USSR, while the entire regions of the RSFSR remained completely without investments from the center. I remember the times when it was considered not good at all to spend some materials on your country house - they were built from trash or stolen materials.
And this is in a country that simply had a giant construction complex.
Here you could get away from all this squalor in the RSFSR if there were an equal federal budget, without infringing on the RSFSR.
In Belarus, the situation was similar, but it gave up no more than 20% of its GDP, and in addition, after the war it was seriously rebuilt for allied investments, so the infrastructure was in better condition there.
I can tell you a lot about this, and how Gorbachev's gang shook the economy of the USSR, stealing almost 5 years of investments from the country, which led to a crisis, and not a "doomed scoop."
Yes, yes, everything is bookkeeping and documented transparently and simply - the Soviet economy was deliberately and cynically drowned.

[tihonmarine]

According to the author, the withdrawal of 9,5 thousand US troops from the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany will "cross out" all the efforts of NATO that the alliance has made over the years in "confrontation with Russia."

Such a freebie floats out of the nose thanks to Trump. How many of them will have to take off their shoulder straps and go to work in the "national economy".

[Pvi1206]

Russia has access to the Baltic Sea ... the only thing that is missing is the land corridor to the Kaliningrad enclave ...

[Alexfly]

When did Russia capture the Baltic states? Remind!

[yehat2]

Russia bought the Baltic states from Sweden during the time of Peter the Great as a result of the war.
then during the revolution in 17 the Baltic states declared independence (but they didn’t return the money) and the white officers defended the separatist skirmishes with the RSFSR.
then, before the ww2, the baptists, frightened of the complete annexation by Germany, asked the USSR for entry and
they were accepted. in 41, it was the Baltic front, which was actually staffed by the Baltic army, was the first to be destroyed due to the massive desertion of local warriors, which caused the collapse of the entire central direction and forced waste and huge losses of the Red Army units.
Then the Germans occupied the Baltic states, in 44 they were recaptured
With the collapse of the USSR, the Baltic states broke off again among the first, without paying a dime for investments or the total external debt of the USSR and seriously sold a number of technologies and buns of the USSR to the West.
But there has never been any capture of the Baltic states of the USSR or RI.

[north 2]

Quote: Pvi1206

Russia has access to the Baltic Sea ... the only thing that is missing is the land corridor to the Kaliningrad enclave ...

state of their land. which are
the first thing and work of twenty years, should have been the return to the Russian state of their lands, which are now called what should not be called Belarus, and what should be called Mogilev, Vitebsk, Grodno, Minsk provinces of Russia. For twenty years, it was possible to return these provinces to Russia and the region in Russia to reform in the province. And what Belarus will have to return, like Crimea, is obvious, because Russia will not wait until
Lukashenko to become a hybrid of Yanukovych-Poroshenko. Then Kaliningrad and continental Russia will become a hundred times worse and more dangerous than the Crimea and continental Russia under Yanukovych and Poroshenko ...

[Ros 56]

Without fail, I really liked Riga and Jurmala in Soviet times.

[faterdom]

Maybe it's better to capture Denmark? There is experience. And let the Baltic states with Poles and Swedes butt for influence in the Baltic ...

[nikvic46]

This news is part of the fight against Trump. If the Americans leave Europe, it will not wring their hands.

[lubesky]

They bullied us with the Baltic states, I already subconsciously begin to believe that we really want. I wake up in a cold sweat and only one thought knocks in my temple, the answer to which they themselves don’t even know - why the hell did she surrender to us, the Baltic States ???

[NF68]

Why the hell does Russia need this Baltic? Really because of sprats? Yes, and to start a war for this?