Gazprom will purchase pipes for the largest ever amount

136

The Russian company Gazprom Invest announced the purchase of pipes in the amount of 100 billion rubles in a single lot. This pipe order will be the largest ever. history company existence.

Delivery should take place in 2021 and 2022. The company will need almost 1,3 million tons of large diameter pipes (LDP). They should go to the company's bases in Romanovo, Ukhta, Ryzdvyanoy and Buguruslan. Gazprom invest is ready to pay for them no more than 98 million rubles.



The final choice of the contractor is scheduled for June 16, but the deadlines may move.

The price is set at the rate of an average of 77 thousand rubles per ton, which is the average indicator for the purchase of pipes by Gazprom this year. However, since the beginning of the year the company has not received large deliveries. In total, their value did not exceed even one billion rubles. Last year also was not marked by large purchases by Gazprom of LDP, which totaled only 5 billion rubles.

Prior to this order, the largest pipe supply for Gazprom’s needs was considered to be 500 thousand tons of these products worth 41 billion rubles, which the company received from the Zagorsky Pipe Plant for the recently begun construction of the Kovykta – Chayanda gas pipeline.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    136 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +13
      7 June 2020 13: 41
      I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia
      1. +11
        7 June 2020 13: 53
        Quote: Olgovich
        I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia

        Inet to help. GAZPROM buys ChelPipe.
        1. +19
          7 June 2020 14: 27
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          Inet to help. GAZPROM buys ChelPipe.

          And you
          Zagorsk Pipe Plant (co-owned by Nikolai Egorov, lawyer and classmate of the president)
          и
          Pipe Pipe Metallurgical Company (Dmitry Pumpyansky - one of the three "kings of the state order")

          Quote: Olgovich
          I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia

          a hundred years already. except exclusive
          ChelPipe Group export deliveries in 2017 increased and amounted to 587 thousand tons, of which 437 thousand tons were sent to the far abroad market, and 150 thousand tons to the CIS countries.

          Izhora Pipe Mill is 100% loaded.
          1. +3
            7 June 2020 16: 01
            Quote: opus
            a hundred years already. except exclusive
            ChelPipe Group export deliveries in 2017 increased and amounted to 587 thousand tons, of which 437 thousand tons were sent to the far abroad market, and 150 thousand tons to the CIS countries.

            Izhora Pipe Mill is 100% loaded.


            Excellent!

            I simply know that, for example, pressure pipes D 250 and higher from ductile Iron with a zinc-bitumen coating and a cement sheath were not produced in Russia.

            Maybe behind ...
            1. +2
              7 June 2020 22: 44
              Quote: Olgovich
              were not produced in Russia.

              not strong in pipes, but there seems to be no problem

            2. 0
              8 June 2020 21: 18
              Quote: Olgovich
              I simply know that, for example, pressure pipes D 250 and higher from ductile Iron with a zinc-bitumen coating and a cement sheath were not produced in Russia.
              Maybe behind ...
              Rather forgotten. request Svobodny Sokol is the only manufacturer in the CIS. Export deliveries to Japan, France. The internet is. Developed GOST R "Pig-iron oil pipes from HPC with spheroidal graphite". feel
          2. -3
            7 June 2020 21: 07
            Ah, Pumpyansky ... i.e. "Family" (with a capital letter).
            1. 0
              8 June 2020 05: 51
              Yes, Khodorkovsky would have been better.
        2. -7
          7 June 2020 18: 07
          I would like to see little articles about complex engineering products, and not "narco" MOV gas - our everything. One of the world's TNCs is certainly good, but how and who will build aircraft carriers?
          how to draw attention to the 2nd and 3rd redistribution? for example --- diesel generators, and hydraulics. are such "pieces of iron" unreadable?
          VO does not have this interest! - it’s time to change the VO region in Moscow to Switzerland, following Deripaska and Usmanov
          1. +6
            7 June 2020 18: 40
            Here are the resources https://sdelanounas.ru and the YouTube channel 'Time Forward' to help you without shit and shit
            1. -7
              7 June 2020 18: 52
              it’s not VO - I’m writing about it, but who wants to find what you wrote
        3. +2
          8 June 2020 16: 32
          Quote: Mavrikiy

          Inet to help. GAZPROM buys ChelPipe.

          It is wonderful. But I would like to believe that these pipes are not intended for Nord Stream-3 or Turkish Stream-2, but for internal use.
          1. +1
            8 June 2020 18: 47
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Quote: Mavrikiy

            Inet to help. GAZPROM buys ChelPipe.

            It is wonderful. But I would like to believe that these pipes are not intended for Nord Stream-3 or Turkish Stream-2, but for internal use.

            These pipes for the repair of existing pipelines ...
            if you’re wondering what you’re really looking for, look here.
            https://energybase.ru/pipeline?PipelineSearch%5Bname%5D=&PipelineSearch%5Btype_env%5D=gas-pipeline&PipelineSearch%5Btype_lay%5D=&PipelineSearch%5Bstate%5D=
        4. +1
          8 June 2020 19: 37
          Now, right now, the boom will be in the Urals for Lomoviks ..... the same price of m / scrap will jump to 15-16000 per ton
      2. +3
        7 June 2020 13: 54
        Quote: Olgovich
        I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia

        I also hope for this and there are capacities .. Especially, given the sanctions, every year more and more Western! Gasification of Russia begins, and especially Siberia .. Well, let's see what happens, but for now we will observe a new wave of howling and hysteria and it is better to keep quiet))))))
        1. 0
          8 June 2020 18: 49
          Quote: Yezhov
          Gasification of Russia begins, and especially Siberia .. Well, let's see what happens, but for now we will observe a new wave of howling and hysteria and it’s better to keep quiet))))))

          No gasification of Russia.
          Do not even dream.

          The export branch pipe is being replaced - the currency is very much needed, and in order not to disrupt the following contracts, the pipe must be changed in advance ...
      3. +7
        7 June 2020 14: 37
        Quote: Olgovich
        I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia

        The price is indicated in rubles, respectively, and the manufacturer from Russia.
        1. -1
          7 June 2020 15: 10
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Olgovich
          I would like the manufacturing company to be from Russia

          The price is indicated in rubles, respectively, and the manufacturer from Russia.

          Well, God forbid Sergey! Gasification of Russia, it’s like in the days of the beginning of the USSR Electrification of the whole country and the fight against harmlessness.!
          Although while we have an oligarchy and kapstroy, it will be difficult to do .. But let's see! hi
          1. +7
            7 June 2020 15: 13
            Quote: Yezhov
            Gasification of Russia

            No, these pipes for what else ... the diameter is too large. And so with the price of our pipes only Ukrainians could compete, until the moment when they had Donbass
            1. 0
              7 June 2020 15: 33
              Quote: svp67
              Quote: Yezhov
              Gasification of Russia

              No, these pipes for what else ... the diameter is too large. And so with the price of our pipes only Ukrainians could compete, until the moment when they had Donbass

              Well, why, Siberia is large and the Arctic .. Natural gas is life and warmth!
              Technology allows this .. Well, Russia and the rest! Enough of diesel fuel and coal already enough .. We have beauty in the Southern Urad, although the climate is sharply continental hi
          2. -4
            7 June 2020 18: 09
            Do you have Electricity on wires?
            my father spoke back in the 70s about such one from the 1920s ("VILENIN personally could not put a slogan in the text, and who is not known ...") - they dug far and deep.
        2. -2
          7 June 2020 16: 31
          Quote: svp67
          The price is indicated in rubles, respectively, and the manufacturer from Russia.

          Is not a fact. It’s just that in the open spaces of both VO and other Internet resources, the prophets predict a very strong fall in the dollar, the rejection of the dollar in the near future ... Here Gazprom is safe too, it indicated the price in rubles, otherwise God forbid the dollar tomorrow HOW collapses ... Well, so according to the law, all financial transactions in the Russian Federation are carried out in rubles ... laughing laughing laughing
      4. BAI
        +6
        7 June 2020 15: 45
        Gazprom buys pipes only in Russia and will not be able to buy anywhere else (thanks to Reagan, ate at one time). This is the procurement procedure. It’s another matter that the competition may not involve pipe manufacturers, but only those who have the INTERGAZSERT certificate and meet a number of other requirements.
    2. +1
      7 June 2020 13: 43
      After the auction, you can safely buy shares in a company that will win and receive dividends, or even earn on their growth.
      1. -4
        7 June 2020 13: 53
        Quote: Rubi0
        After the auction, you can safely buy shares in a company that will win and receive dividends, or even earn on their growth.

        It is better to buy Gazprom shares - they will grow the most after such a tender. Apparently the government has become the guarantor of this transaction, and it is possible that due to foreign investment, including Chinese, which began to drain American assets. Although it is possible that our banks themselves are happy to lend to this purchase - not everything is fine with Gazprom recently with money. But based on the fact that the SP-2 will be completed, it is possible that their funds will appear. So it’s better to buy Gazprom shares for long-term investments - I think so ...
        1. 0
          7 June 2020 14: 34
          Quote: ccsr
          It is better to buy Gazprom shares - they will grow the most after such a tender.

          I do not advise

          with Tamky like Miller and Co. - you’ll be left without pants


          Quote: ccsr
          So it’s better to buy Gazprom shares for long-term investments - I think so ...

          Gazprom is almost bankrupt
          Gas default: "National Treasure" predicted to collapse in 2021 "


          A mysterious client came to the rescue of Gazprom, having bought about a billion cubic meters, Interfax reports: the company included this gas in its statistics, although not a single pipeline operator recorded deliveries.
          Gazprombank became the buyer of Gazprom’s gas, industry sources told the agency.

          The bank, which the company directly owns by 35%, and through 47% through the Gazfond pension fund, is saving the export schedule, which is crashing at the seams in all markets: in the first six months, after European deliveries, sales fell by 7,2% in countries of the former USSR.


          In the same way, the company acted at the end of last (2018) year to report on achieving record exports and breaking the bar of 200 billion cubic meters per year.
          fuflomycin, as always

          By the end of the year, a hole in Gazprom’s budget could grow to $ 7 billion, Sberbank CIB analysts predicted in August. The company needs 1,326 trillion rubles for the construction of numerous gas pipelines, another 246,9 billion rubles should be directed to dividends. Operating cash flow will not be able to cover the required amount neither this year, nor in 2020-21, when the investment program will be 1,065 and 1,251 trillion rubles, respectively, according to Sberbank CIB.
          To cover the budget deficit Gazprom will be a shock attraction of debt: the company's loan plan for the current year has been increased by 2,4 times - up to 725 billion rubles.

          And you advise to "buy" ... belay
          1. 0
            7 June 2020 15: 39
            Solidarity. There are two more circumstances - SS under a 38 billion contract will be released, emnip, only at 24, Europe was covered by a contract with Ukraine, the Turks - to the maximum - 16 ... China can greatly increase (well, up to 60-80), but he will not quarrel with the Merikos (the last bargaining "the war has clearly shown, they are making concessions) ... Gazprom will do the loans, but it's expensive ... this very moment - 17 (I would have waited for the update of the local maximum (and then, on a decline, upon breaking through 123, I would have shorted mines to 135)
            1. +3
              7 June 2020 17: 12
              I add that 2 years ago, Sberbank analyst Alexander Fek noted that Gazprom was not working for its shareholders (owners), but for contractors, and that the main goal of Gazprom’s activities was to improve the financial position of its contractors. For such conclusions, Fack was immediately dismissed from Sberbank.
              So it’s better to buy the shares of Gazprom’s contractors, or to completely replace any Pumpyansky and Yegorovs (if they don’t kill for it).
          2. +4
            7 June 2020 15: 44
            you forget that the debt of Gazprom is, for example, an advance payment on deliveries from China. Until they start, the prepayment will be in debt. The construction of gas pipelines didn’t cut the money, but the investment again. they will start to bring their profit over time. Yes, and loans are a common practice in full. Everyone in the world uses it for example. For example, from what I remember, Apple and the manufacturer of smartphones and laptops, Apple borrowed $ 7 billion from investors, Bloomberg reports. For such an amount, the technology giant placed bonds with five maturities. The placement took place on Wednesday, September 4. A substantial portion of the new debt - $ 1,5 billion - is borrowing for 30 years. Companies around the world borrow money for new projects or major acquisitions. Usually a business does this when there is not enough free funds. In the case of Apple, this logic does not work: the corporation’s accounts now contain money and securities totaling $ 200 billion. Instead of using its own money, Apple decided to go into debt.
            1. -4
              7 June 2020 16: 01
              Quote: carstorm 11
              . The construction of gas pipelines is not cut money and investment again. about

              good
              Gazprom discovered the missing pipe to Priozersk for the billions spent twice. But the gas is still far
              Representatives of the gas monopoly showed reporters the final section of the gas pipeline, which is supposed to supply the Priozersky district of the Leningrad region. It took seven years to build. During this time, money and pipes disappeared, Vladimir Putin was asked questions, a criminal case was initiated, and the biker Erema disappeared. Outside the brackets, the pressure in the pipe is not enough to connect consumers - the Severnaya station has not been reconstructed. So far, the gas pipeline will only feed the caretaker's house and his burner. Alexander Drozdenko said how long.

              There are nowhere to put such swindlers.
              Quote: carstorm 11
              Instead of using their own money, Apple decided to go into debt.

              Money in the USA in Europe is worth nothing. do not compare with our loans
              Quote: divansin
              Gazprom will not go bankrupt; in case of indiscretion, it will be supported financially from the funds.

              I'm talking about normal market functioning
              1. +1
                8 June 2020 05: 56
                Better tell me: who needs this market, in the case of state-forming companies?
                1. 0
                  8 June 2020 11: 07
                  Quote: mmaxx
                  who needs this market, in the case of state-forming companies?

                  Yes, perhaps everyone. Acre us.
                  Oh yes
                  Foreign companies McDonald's, KFC, PepsiCo, and even the Fonbet betting company, have entered the new list of state-forming enterprises of Russia applying for state support in times of crisis.


                  This was aired on the channel "Tsargrad" economist Yuri Pronko.
                  1. 0
                    8 June 2020 15: 29
                    Quote: opus
                    Foreign companies McDonald's, KFC, PepsiCo included in the new list of state-forming enterprises of Russia applying for state support in times of crisis

                    Have you heard anything about the franchise?
                    There is no need to speculate on Russian companies that operate under a well-known brand, only paying money for using a franchise is a common occurrence in Russian business, and in many areas.
                    I do not know who owns Ltd. McDonald's is in Russia, but it is possible that there will be practically no foreign shareholders there, because the US has long imposed sanctions on our country.
            2. +8
              7 June 2020 19: 40
              Quote: carstorm 11
              Companies around the world borrow money for new projects or major acquisitions.

              Some authors here do not understand at all what long-term investments are, and they already consider what did not bring them income in 2-3 years to be unprofitable. Although any literate person understands that a corporation like Gazprom simply cannot have free money to buy pipes, that is why they will have to take out a loan. And this is a common situation for all corporations in the world, but our financial "analysts" from the forum apparently do not know about it.
          3. -3
            7 June 2020 18: 14
            max capitalization of Gazprom by 08-09 is the idea of ​​exchanging assets with the EU, then they removed the profit again "in the Russian pocket" (buried, hid in the schemes)
          4. +7
            7 June 2020 19: 31
            Quote: opus
            I do not advise

            Are you a stock trader? I do not believe.
            Quote: opus
            Gazprom is almost bankrupt

            Tell this to someone else. Who will give bankrupt 100 billion rubles? You would personally give or so, just to speculate. The American government has been bankrupt for a long time, but the US can’t fall apart. And Gazprom has so many assets that any competent banker will not only give credit on favorable terms, but also knows that the state will pay it off in any case, because it is the owner of this company.
            Quote: opus
            And you advise to "buy" ...

            There are no potential buyers of shares - at least you are clearly not one of them. So consider my advice only as a simple forecast and do not bother much.
            1. -5
              7 June 2020 19: 44
              Quote: ccsr
              Are you a stock trader? I do not believe.

              and do it right:
              1. not a trader
              2. I have never said such nonsense (that I am a trader)
              3.a, that "not a trader" can not open his mouth? and express your opinion? Did I miss something and have already canceled Article 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation?

              Quote: ccsr
              Tell this to someone else. Who will give bankrupt 100 billion rubles? You would personally give or so, just to speculate.

              1. Who exactly to "tell"
              2. I would not give it, even if I had 100 billion. rubles
              3.And who gave 100 billion rubles in debt?
              100bn for Gazprom pah
              early 2019: Gazprom's debt jumped to record 3,8 trillion rubles

              As of December 31, 2018, the total debt of the “national treasure” reached 3,863 trillion rubles. This is a new record for the entire history of the company, which is 597 billion rubles or 18,2% higher than a year ago.
              Net, that is, not covered by cash reserves, debt for the first time exceeded 3 trillion rubles.
              94% of Gazprom’s long-term debt is denominated in foreign currency. This is $ 15,8 billion, € 21 billion and $ 4,7 billion in loans in Swiss francs and other currencies.
              At the end of the year, this currency debt exceeded the company's net proceeds from gas sales to non-CIS countries: net of taxes, duties and excise taxes, Gazprom earned 2,951 trillion rubles (+ 32%) in foreign markets.

              Quote: ccsr
              that any competent banker will not only give credit on favorable terms,

              Maybe Shuvalov? This is a credit banker.
              Vnesheconombank is a state development corporation that finances Kremlin megaprojects
              In 2017, VEB received 150 billion rubles from the budget and recorded a net loss under IFRS in the amount of 287,7 billion rubles, a record in history.
              Last year, the loss amounted to 175,8 billion rubles, 40% higher than the amount allotted to the state corporation from the federal treasury.
              Quote: ccsr
              The American government has been bankrupt for a long time, but the US can’t fall apart.

              Who said such nonsense?
              FRS liabilities for trillions with a yield of 0,25% per annum are not bought from a bankrupt
              Quote: ccsr
              do not bother much.

              where did you get the idea that I was "confused"?
              1. +2
                7 June 2020 20: 23
                Quote: opus
                2. I would not give it, even if I had 100 billion. rubles

                And others will give and more on this they will earn.
                Quote: opus
                Gazprom's debt jumped to a record 3,8 trillion rubles

                I think that you don’t even know the structure of Gazprom’s debt, that's why you look at the total amount, not understanding what the real profitability of this corporation is. I'm not saying that Gazprom shares are willing to buy, judging by the fact that they are constantly growing in price. So they can simply make an additional emission, however you are unlikely to be interested in these subtleties.
                Quote: opus
                Vnesheconombank is a state development corporation that finances Kremlin megaprojects

                Do you know other banks - for example, with foreign capital or Chinese?
                Quote: opus
                where did you get the idea that I was "confused"?

                It painfully you strongly began to dissuade forum readers to buy Gazprom shares, I thought that you yourself secretly want to buy them. I hope your condition allows you to do this on a large scale ...
                1. -3
                  7 June 2020 21: 08
                  Quote: ccsr
                  And others will give and more on this they will earn.

                  flag them "in there"

                  Quote: ccsr
                  I think that you don’t even know the debt structure of Gazprom

                  think what you want, if you know (yourself) ENLIGHTEN, not just popping ...
                  Quote: ccsr
                  But you don’t know other banks

                  so if you know, ENLIGHTEN, and not just pop ...
                  so far (which year in a row) Gazprombank "buys" gas from Gazprom. It definitely is.
                  And we will finance Gazprom's "successes": the NWF and pensions and others. With taxes it is quite possible.
                  Quote: ccsr
                  It painfully you strongly began to dissuade the readers of the forum to buy shares

                  I didn’t notice something. I saw / read
                  Quote: ccsr
                  Better buy Gazprom shares - they will grow most of all, after this tenders. Apparently the government has become the guarantor of this transaction, and it is possible that due to foreign investment, including Chinese, which began to drain American assets. Although it is possible that our banks themselves are happy to lend to this purchase - not everything is fine with Gazprom recently with money. But based on the fact that the SP-2 will be completed, it is possible that their funds will appear. So it’s better to buy Gazprom shares for long-term investments - I think so...

                  look how everything is "competently" painted
                  Quote: ccsr
                  Some authors here do not understand what long-term investments are, and that which did not bring them income in 2-3 years they already consider unprofitable. Although any competent person understandsthen a corporation like Gazprom simply cannot have free money to buy pipes, which is why they will be forced to take a loan

                  As I understand it, there is only one "competent person" wink
                  1. +4
                    7 June 2020 21: 17
                    Quote: opus
                    look how everything is "competently" painted

                    I studied political economy in a Soviet university and then knew how to explain what capitalism is and how it functions. As it turned out, nothing has changed since then, which is why having basic training is not at all difficult to sort out what is happening in Russia at present, and in Gazprom in particular. It is a pity that you did not receive such knowledge, so you are rushing around, operating with slogans, and not knowledge of how cartels, corporations and multinational companies work with borrowed capital.
                    1. -2
                      7 June 2020 21: 56
                      Quote: ccsr
                      I studied political economy in a Soviet university and then knew how to explain what capitalism is and how it functions.

                      What a paradox. and I "studied" the same crap "Gloomy Science" = "The Political Economy of Capitalism and Socialism"
                      и
                      Marxist-Leninist philosophy.
                      + Our issue is the last, which passed the state on scientific communism.
                      So what ? How did you "learn" successfully there?
                      How many companies do you personally have founded? Turnover? success in general?

                      Quote: ccsr
                      It’s a pity that you didn’t get such knowledge, so you’re rushing around,

                      Chuchundrik ... you see not in the know of my knowledge, but reason. With such aplomb, however, as well as about Gazprom and cartels.
                      1. -1
                        8 June 2020 15: 22
                        Quote: opus
                        So what ? How did you "learn" successfully there?

                        In the easy - to any techie of the Soviet period, this science was easily given. It was more difficult not to pass the state exam, but to defend the diploma - any Soviet engineer will confirm this to you.
                        Quote: opus
                        How many companies do you personally have founded?

                        I have been registered as an individual entrepreneur for a long time, although there was a time when I had to lead some small business teams. And as a rule, anyone who has gone through this school understands better than many others how everything works in business, because they did everything themselves.

                        Quote: opus
                        success in general?

                        I think that it’s normal, but I won’t talk about it. this is unlikely to affect the level of knowledge. What are you doing, what do you undertake to discuss, am I right or not?
                        Quote: opus
                        you see you are not aware of my knowledge,

                        Do not know. Tell about them.
          5. +4
            7 June 2020 21: 09
            Quote: opus
            Gazprom is almost bankrupt

            laughing laughing laughing Petty bourgeoisie, surround yourself.
            1. -3
              7 June 2020 22: 07
              Quote: Paranoid50
              Petty bourgeoisie, surround yourself.

              buy
              Quote: ccsr
              It is better to buy Gazprom shares - they will grow the most after such a tender.


              So wrote people
              Quote: ccsr
              I studied political economy in a Soviet university
        2. 0
          8 June 2020 18: 51
          Quote: ccsr
          Quote: Rubi0
          After the auction, you can safely buy shares in a company that will win and receive dividends, or even earn on their growth.

          It is better to buy Gazprom shares - they will grow the most after such a tender. Apparently the government has become the guarantor of this transaction, and it is possible that due to foreign investment, including Chinese, which began to drain American assets. Although it is possible that our banks themselves are happy to lend to this purchase - not everything is fine with Gazprom recently with money. But based on the fact that the SP-2 will be completed, it is possible that their funds will appear. So it’s better to buy Gazprom shares for long-term investments - I think so ...


          The Chinese have not given us a single yuan of loans ...
          If you remember how many screams there were, that the Chinese would start investing in our economy after Western banks were banned?
          So - there are no and there haven’t been any Chinese investments, namely banking ones ...
          1. 0
            8 June 2020 19: 04
            Quote: SovAr238A
            The Chinese have not given us a single yuan of loans ...

            They themselves are now in a deep ... well because of the trumps of Trump, and therefore they probably save their money, because it is not clear how the crisis will hit them. Prior to this, they willingly invested in all projects that helped to supply resources to China, even in Africa.
            Quote: SovAr238A
            So - there are no, and there were no, Chinese investments, namely banking

            And who paid for the construction of the previous Power of Siberia gas pipeline?
            1. 0
              8 June 2020 19: 37
              Quote: ccsr
              Quote: SovAr238A
              The Chinese have not given us a single yuan of loans ...

              They themselves are now in a deep ... well because of the trumps of Trump, and therefore they probably save their money, because it is not clear how the crisis will hit them. Prior to this, they willingly invested in all projects that helped to supply resources to China, even in Africa.
              Quote: SovAr238A
              So - there are no, and there were no, Chinese investments, namely banking

              And who paid for the construction of the previous Power of Siberia gas pipeline?


              The first one. And here Jo ... and Trump, if 7 years have already passed since the start of banking sanctions?


              Second. The Power of Siberia is fully paid for by Gazprom ... All 55 billion dollars, how much is the pipe on our side ...

              Didn't you know that?
              1. 0
                9 June 2020 11: 52
                Quote: SovAr238A
                The first one. And here Jo ... and Trump, if 7 years have already passed since the start of banking sanctions?

                Despite the fact that it was under Trump that duties on Chinese goods were introduced and a customs war began, and the Chinese have not yet won it. And it did not begin seven years ago.

                Quote: SovAr238A
                Second. The Power of Siberia is fully paid for by Gazprom ... All 55 billion dollars, how much is the pipe on our side ...

                Exactly what on ours, and with the price it seems you are not in the know:
                The construction cost was initially estimated at 800 billion rubles, but was later revised to 1,1 trillion rubles. [1]

                Quote: SovAr238A
                Didn't you know that?

                And you well know what experts write about the whole deal:
                According to some experts, “Gazprom’s record gas contract with CNPC was concluded on terms favorable to China, and for the Russian monopoly it may turn out to be minimally profitable” [30]. “Without an advance [of the Chinese side], the construction price may increase and the gas pipeline will not pay off while maintaining the existing 30% customs duty” [31]. It is also alleged that “The Power of Siberia” will pay off only if the price of gas on the border with China is 360-400 dollars per 1 cubic meters — this is twice the average price of Gazprom’s export to Europe in the first nine months of 2017 ”[ 32]. In this case, the pipeline will pay off no earlier than 2048 [33].

                And if we consider that now more and more countries are abandoning long-term contracts, it is possible that a price of $ 300-400 may turn out to be unattainable. So with "Power of Siberia -2" not everything is so happy.
      2. +1
        7 June 2020 14: 02
        Unless of course, there is something to buy. And there is someone to earn. You can not worry about this.
        1. +2
          7 June 2020 17: 53
          You don’t have to worry about Gazprom - it has almost 13 trillion rubles of its own capital; it certainly will not be impoverished in this or in all subsequent years.
          1. +2
            7 June 2020 20: 32
            Already for Gazprom I worry the least, and for its main shareholders too.
      3. BAI
        0
        7 June 2020 15: 46
        After the auction

        Shares must be bought before the auction, until they have risen in price.
    3. +2
      7 June 2020 13: 50
      recently begun construction of the Kovykta-Chayanda gas pipeline.

      The thing is the pipe.
      Everything is calm, everything is the way
      The whole country is a big Gazprom!
      1. -2
        7 June 2020 13: 58
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        recently begun construction of the Kovykta-Chayanda gas pipeline.

        The thing is the pipe.
        Everything is calm, everything is the way
        The whole country is a big Gazprom!

        If Gaza is not in the country, he deflated in pince-nez .. laughing
        And it's time to scream, so it always has been !!!
        But we don’t want to shout and who we need to plant ..
        Here are such things, always in our heads! soldier
        1. The comment was deleted.
    4. -1
      7 June 2020 13: 52
      Chayanda’s resources are not enough for China. And the promise must be fulfilled.
      1. 0
        7 June 2020 17: 58
        In this article, from which you learned Old, there is not a word about the lack of gas in the field - it was written about unfinished development and problems with the field development itself, but there is an implication of pulling the owl onto the globe.
      2. +2
        7 June 2020 20: 15
        Quote: knn54
        Chayanda resources for China are not enough.

        There is also Kovykta.
    5. -6
      7 June 2020 13: 52
      Gazprom will purchase pipes for the largest ever amount
      Congratulations. Manufacturer ChTPZ. Or before consumption, you need to degrease, to the skin?
    6. +6
      7 June 2020 13: 53
      It seems that Power of Siberia -2 is becoming a reality. It becomes fast, fast. Where else can you put so many pipes? And the factories will surely be Russian? Although, recently it was ours who used ...
      1. -7
        7 June 2020 14: 36
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        It looks like "Power of Siberia -2" is becoming a reality.

        Why is she (No. 2)?
        Bury the casing headstock:
        The power of Siberia -1 does not function by way. LNG at a price cheaper than GH at times
        1. +5
          7 June 2020 14: 50
          Quote: opus
          LNG at a price cheaper than GHG at times

          Forever cheaper? Well, from the word never ... LNG in general cannot be cheaper than pipeline gas. Just because of the natural costs of liquefaction, delivery, storage, regasification! And still distribution networks - pipelines ...
          1. -8
            7 June 2020 15: 01
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Just because of the natural costs of liquefying, shipping,

            in .... "for delivery"
            1. From America the Atlantic flow (pipe) to Europe can not be laid
            America in first place gas production 666,228 mrd cubic meters. and long overtook Russia and the rest

            2. America's shale gas is the cheapest in the world

            With a transportation distance of more than 2500 kilometers, liquefied natural gas can compete in price with piped gas. Compared to pipelines, the LNG market has flexibility and mobility, and has the advantages of a modular increase in supplies, and also removes border crossing problems in some cases.

            LNG Market Growth Much Exceeds Pipeline Natural Gas Market Growth Prospects
            We look here (they see in the world, except you all can not count)




            The cost of construction of SP-2 estimated at € 9,5 billionThe launch of the pipeline is expected before the end of 2019.

            The largest manufacturers of gas tankers are Japanese and Korean shipyards: Mitsui, Daewoo, Hyundai, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Kawasaki.
            Modern Q-Flex and Q-Max tankers have solid net tonnage and are capable of transporting up to 210-266 thousand m3 of LNG.

            The charter cycle of the LNG carrier includes:

            loading a vessel in an LNG export port, for example 160 m000 of liquid LNG, is loaded for 3 day;
            flight time for which the cost of the charter day is taken. Flight time is the distance between ports through a specific delivery route, assuming both a return and a return trip, during which the fuel will be consumed to power marine engines.

            The cost of renting a tanker - standard size gas carriers 40 - 200 thousand US dollars / day, depending on the time of year.


            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            regasification!

            LNG regasification - a technological process for converting liquefied natural gas to a gaseous state when using environmental energy: atmospheric air or sea water. LNG regasification at small and medium-sized stations is most often carried out in atmospheric evaporators, and at large sea terminals - in heat exchangers with sea water
            1. +2
              7 June 2020 15: 13
              Quote: opus
              in .... "for delivery"
              1. From America the Atlantic flow (pipe) to Europe can not be laid
              America in first place gas production 666,228 mrd cubic meters. and long overtook Russia and the rest

              2. America's shale gas is the cheapest in the world

              Is he there? Is there gas for sale in the USA? Which LNG? While they are selling to the side of minuscule. Compared to our pipeline. They only threaten, but at the current prices on the spot market, they have a net loss. And our Yamal-LNG and Sakhalin-3 are not in vain eating bread. Signed LNG our pipelines. It’s cheaper anyway ... Just closer.
              1. -2
                7 June 2020 15: 21
                Quote: Mountain Shooter
                Is he there? Is there gas for sale in the USA? Which LNG? While they are selling to the side of minuscule

                belay
                At the end of 2019, exports of liquefied natural gas from the United States grew 1,7 times and amounted to 1,82 trillion cubic feet (about 51,5 billion cubic meters). This was announced at the end of last week by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy.
                51,5 billion cubic meters minuscule?

                Export of pipeline gas from the United States increased by 12% year-on-year to 2,835 trillion cubic feet (80,3 billion cubic meters). The average price of pipeline exports amounted to $ 2,64 per 1 thousand cubic feet, or $ 93,2 per 1 thousand cubic meters

                Quote: Mountain Shooter
                Our Yamal-LNG and Sakhalin-3

                Sahali is not quite ours, there are Exxon, Mobil and Texaco.
                they are barbarians energy resources in Kamchatka, and Sahali sold in U.E. The dollar was at 80r, from the communal apartment they all howled
                1. +6
                  7 June 2020 15: 29
                  Quote: opus
                  The United States grew 1,7 times to 1,82 trillion cubic feet (about 51,5 billion cubic meters). About

                  Yeah. But how much are Gazprom deliveries? Through the pipes? At least 7 times more. US PIPELINE SUPPLIES WE DO NOT LOOK.
                  What is Sakhalin on the domestic market of Russia? We are looking at U.S. LNG competition with pipeline gas. Russian, of course.
                  1. -6
                    7 June 2020 15: 43
                    Quote: Mountain Shooter
                    Yeah. But how much are Gazprom deliveries? Through the pipes? At least 7 times more

                    1. Is it about this? Someone wrote:
                    Quote: Mountain Shooter
                    Is he there? Is there gas for sale in the USA? Which LNG?

                    the answer is.
                    Quote: opus
                    At the end of 2019, exports of liquefied natural gas from the United States grew 1,7 times and amounted to 1,82 trillion cubic feet (about 51,5 billion cubic meters).

                    2.
                    At the end of 2019, Gazprom delivered 192,558 billion m3 of gas to Europe, which is 4,1% less than in 2018.

                    comparable to

                    Quote: opus
                    Pipeline exports gas from the USA year-on-year increased by 12% and amounted to 2,835 trillion cubic feet (80,3 billion cubic meters).

                    Vs. 192 80
                    3. By 2028, the United States will overtake Russia in all respects

                    Quote: Mountain Shooter
                    What is Sakhalin on the domestic market of Russia?

                    pegged to the dollar.
                    Sadness there
                    Quote: Mountain Shooter
                    We are looking at U.S. LNG competition with pipeline gas. Russian, of course.

                    of course. the question is not about mythical supplies. in deliveries WHERE.
                    Repetition

                    Quote: opus
                    With a transportation distance of more than 2500 kilometers, liquefied natural gas can compete in price with piped gas. Compared to pipelines, the LNG market has flexibility and mobility, and has the advantages of a modular increase in supplies, and also removes border crossing problems in some cases.

                    and if gas is also extracted like shale, much less
                    1. +4
                      7 June 2020 17: 35
                      Quote: opus
                      At the end of 2019, exports of liquefied natural gas from the United States grew 1,7 times and amounted to 1,82 trillion cubic feet (about 51,5 billion cubic meters).

                      Is it only to Europe? Probably not? These are ALL supplies. And you compare them only with the European supplies of Gazprom. By the way, how quickly is America able to increase LNG supplies to Europe? They themselves are very skeptical about this ... That is why they are trying to organize a "gas famine" in Europe this winter. They want prices, prices ...
                      1. -3
                        7 June 2020 18: 05
                        Quote: Mountain Shooter
                        you compare them only with Gazprom’s European supplies.

                        all export. and wrote it.
                        Gazprom just pointed to Europe (there, in my opinion, Turkey incl to Europe)
                        Too lazy to search for the rest
                        Quote: Mountain Shooter
                        By the way, how quickly is America able to increase LNG supplies to Europe?

                        Up to 2015 yearswhen the first US Sabine Pass natural gas liquefaction plant began operations, the country only imported this energy (gas).
                        Sabine Pass
                        The total capacity of the four production lines of the Sabine Pass terminal is 18 million tons of LNG per year. In total, the plant will have six lines with a total capacity of 27 million tons of liquefied gas per year. To do this, it remains to launch two lines of 4,5 million tons each.

                        Corpus christy
                        LNG production was launched in November 2018. This LNG terminal is located on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico in southern Texas.

                        Previously, a regasification LNG terminal was located here, but in the wake of the US shale boom, Cheniere Energy considered it expedient to implement an LNG production project on this site.

                        After reaching full capacity in 2021–2022, the enterprise will have five lines with a capacity of 4,5 million tons per year each, with a total capacity of 22,5 million tons of LNG per year.

                        The project provides for expansion due to additional capacities of medium productivity. The possibility of building seven more lines with a capacity of 1,4 million tons per year each, which will increase the total capacity of the project to 32,3 million tons of LNG per year, is being considered.

                        Thus, after the launch of all 12 production lines, Corpus Christi will become the largest LNG terminal in the United States. Investments in the project amounted to $ 15 billion. Liquefied gas from the first two stages and partially from the third stage has already been contracted.

                        Cove Point LNG
                        Gas liquefaction capacity 5.25 million tons / year (MTPA)
                        Number of technological lines (queues) 1
                        Number of LNG storage tanks 7
                        Volume of LNG storage tanks 700 m³
                        Dominion Energy Signs Long Term Contracts for up to 20 years with subsidiaries of Indian GAIL, as well as Japanese Sumitomo Corp. and Tokyo Gas.

                        Elba Island LNG
                        Gas liquefaction capacity 2.50 million tons / year (MTPA)
                        Number of technological lines (queues) 10
                        Number of LNG storage tanks 5

                        Calcasieu Pass received approval
                        The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a project to build the Calcasieu Pass plant in Louisiana this year, with an export potential of 12 million tons of LNG per year. Its value is estimated at $ 5 billion. Venture Global has already entered into twenty-year contracts with Shell and BP for the supply of liquefied natural gas from this plant.

                        Three more LNG plants are expected to be launched in the next year and a half. In particular, the first lines of the Freeport LNG project in Texas, with a design capacity of 20 million tons per year, and the Cameron LNG plant in Louisiana with five production lines of 5 million tons each, will be launched. Another terminal, the Houston LNG, operated by Tellurian, is also planned to be built in Louisiana.

                        The volume of deliveries of American gas to the world market will depend on how many LNG projects will receive an export permit and will actually be implemented. At the beginning of 2017, licenses to supply gas to any foreign markets, according to VYGON Consulting, received 14 U.S. LNG projects for 153 million tons of production capacity, including those under construction. At the same time, 40 projects submitted applications for consideration, with a total production capacity of 390 million tons per year.

                        In 2019, an investment decision was made on another 13 export LNG projects. If all these plants are built, The United States may occupy up to 30% of the global liquefied natural gas market.

                        according to the forecast of the International Energy Agency (IEA), according to which the United States by the end of 2022 will come in second in the world in terms of LNG exports. The leader, according to the agency’s forecast, will be Australia, and Qatar, which today occupies the first place, will move to the third position.

                        in 2026-2028 they will produce many times more Russia.
                        1. +2
                          8 June 2020 06: 39
                          Quote: opus
                          After reaching full capacity in 2021–2022, the enterprise will have five lines with a capacity of 4,5 million tons per year each, with a total capacity of 22,5 million tons of LNG per year.

                          To simplify the analysis.
                          1 million tons of LNG corresponds to 1.38 mlr. cubic meters of gas in the pipe.
                          Total, all this grandiose BLA-BLA-BLA ... has a capacity of less than 1 branch SP-1.
                        2. -1
                          8 June 2020 11: 00
                          Quote: Mountain Shooter
                          Total, all this is a grandiose BLA-BLA-BLA.

                          It reminds me of something: SpaecX laughs
                          "macaroni mask"
                          "when it starts, then we'll talk"
                          "global swindler"

                          Quote: Mountain Shooter
                          1 million tons of LNG corresponds to 1.38 mlr. cubic meters of gas in the pipe.

                          The power of Siberia No. 1 = 35 ml. estimated m2020, 5 billion cubic meters planned for XNUMX
                          it seemed to be worth 11 trillion rubles (no?)
                          35: 1,38 = 25 million tons of LNG
                          Quote: opus
                          Freeport LNG in Texas, with a design capacity of 20 million tons per year, and the Cameron LNG plant in Louisiana with five production lines of 5 million tons each.

                          good
                          SP-1 has 58,8 billion m³ per year (actual): 1,38 = 42,6 mln tons of LNG
                          Quote: opus
                          According to VYGON Consulting, received 14 US LNG projects on 153 million tons of production capacity, including those under construction.

                          Real "blah blah blah"
                      2. +1
                        8 June 2020 06: 11
                        The guy in the course is inadequate. Should I argue? Even to understand that demand will not increase in the same time as the United States will overtake "Gazprom" (according to him) is unable.
                      3. 0
                        8 June 2020 19: 05
                        Quote: Mountain Shooter

                        Is it only to Europe? Probably not? These are ALL supplies. And you compare them only with the European supplies of Gazprom. By the way, how quickly is America able to increase LNG supplies to Europe? They themselves are very skeptical about this ... That is why they are trying to organize a "gas famine" in Europe this winter. They want prices, prices ...


                        You do not take into account the fact that the pipeline market is only Europe and just a bit of the Middle East. And the prerequisites for growth - a minimum - only the closure of nuclear power plants. And that’s all.
                        The rest of the world, especially the one where there is real development and real growth in consumption - CGU / Africa, Southeast Asia, etc.
                    2. +4
                      7 June 2020 18: 13
                      "By 2028, the US will overtake Russia in all respects." By what indicators, in Russia the same is actively developing the production of LNG and the plan is to produce it 75 million tons until 2030 by 2035 120 million tons. Gazprom also has LNG plants Baltic LNG and Vladivostok LNG. And the fact that the US prices for LNG are dumping is already a fact, but this will not last forever for the time being, and there, with the recruited client base and destroyed competitors, the price tags will begin to grow. Power of Siberia 2 - China wants.
                      1. -6
                        7 June 2020 18: 21
                        Quote: Vadim237
                        Russia is also actively developing LNG production and there is a plan for the production of 75 million tons by 2030

                        I'm afraid the "plans" will be stolen
                        2028 US 140 billion cubic meters m (about 101 million tons)
                        LNG production in Russia over the same period will grow only 2,7 times, from 25 billion to 68 billion cubic meters. m (about 50 million tons), allowing it to become the third LNG producer in the world.

                        Quote: Vadim237
                        And the fact that US LNG prices are dumped is a fact

                        belay

                        To purchase LNG produced in the USA, you need to sign a contract with Sabine Pass (say) for liquefying gas and pay an advance for equipment rental. This amount is non-refundable. Given the fact that we are talking about billions of cubic meters of gas and millions of tons of LNG, advance payments amount to millions of dollars.
                        what dumping?
                        Quote: opus
                        Venture Global has already concluded with Shell and BP twenty year contracts for the supply of liquefied gas from this plant.


                        According to McKinsey, today the United States exports LNG to 26 countries, accounting for 70% of the total number of importers.

                        Since 2017, the Republic of Korea and Mexico are the largest importers of North American LNG, each of which accounts for 20% of exports. Mexico increased LNG imports due to a shortage of capacities in the cross-border pipeline system amid a sharp increase in gas demand.

                        Another 40% of supplies come from Asian markets - Japan, the Republic of Korea, China and Taiwan. 10% of volumes were shipped to Argentina, Brazil, the Dominican Republic and Chile.

                        Due to its relative proximity, Latin America is estimated as the most promising market for American LNG, however, as McKinsey experts note, this fact does not guarantee an increase in imports.

                        In turn, American LNG entered the markets of Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and India, which are closest to Qatar. Demand for LNG in China and India began to grow in the summer of 2018, absorbing most of the reserves of Pacific exporters.
                        Quote: Vadim237
                        The power of Siberia 2 - China wants.

                        China?
                        Why is he not using the power of Siberia No. 1?
                        As I understand it, SS№2 is the last opportunity to finally tear up (steal) the non-tattered. Just until 2036 is enough
                        1. +2
                          7 June 2020 19: 53
                          Dumping through the same taxes and maximum exemptions from the US government. China, the Power of Siberia is not enough, we need another branch of 6700 kilometers with a long design capacity of 50 to 60 billion cubic meters per year, and it will be built by 2030.
                        2. -6
                          7 June 2020 20: 07
                          Quote: Vadim237
                          Dumping through the same taxes and maximum exemptions from the US government.

                          belay
                          Quote: Vadim237
                          China, the Power of Siberia is not enough

                          belay belay
                          The total length of the gas pipeline is about 3 thousand km, design export capacity - 38 billion m3, pressure - 9,8 MPa, pipe diameter - 1420 mm, cost - 1,1 trillion rubles

                          In 2020, according to the "Power of Siberia" 5 billion m3 of gas planned to be exported (1,6% of the needs of China), in 2021 - 10 billion m3. The pipeline will reach its design capacity in a few years - taking into account gas supplies from the Kovykta field, production of which will begin at the end of 2022 and reach its design capacity in 2025 year.
                          Hype .... "not enough"
                          capacity 38 billion cubic meters m. planned for 2020: 5 billion cubic meters to drive away.
                          Lacks.
                          Yes, stop reading krelesmi and listen to propaganda.
                        3. -2
                          8 June 2020 14: 16
                          I listen and follow the projects of Gazprom - but not as kralesmi.
                        4. +1
                          8 June 2020 16: 43
                          Quote: Vadim237
                          I listen and follow the projects of Gazprom - but not as kralesmi.

                          Commendable.
                          Then remember me: they will deceive, tear and run away (with a national treasure), we will remain a broken trough
            2. 0
              7 June 2020 15: 14
              This is a good remark why Gazprom is not investing in shipbuilding of gas carriers. Rosneft went to Star and built 46 Afromax, why Gazprom clung to the pipes is an unanswered question. As for me, there are some pluses, the countries of the mongrel a la Ukraine and Poland are excluded, mobility, in the end, shipbuilding gives a multiplier effect in the economy 1 place to 8 in adjacent ones, but freight and leasing on the extreme
              1. -5
                7 June 2020 15: 26
                Quote: Rubi0
                why Gazprom clinging to pipes is an unanswered question

                not at all.
                The answer is in the same place why Sobyanin has a middle name (popularly) Bordyurych and why the State Duma Speaker can declare almost 2, 000 rubles of income.
              2. +1
                7 June 2020 15: 33
                Quote: Rubi0
                why Gazprom is not investing in shipbuilding of gas carriers a question. Rosneft went to Star and build 46 Afromax, why Gazprom clung to the pipes is an unanswered question. As for me, some pluses, countries are excluded

                Just builds. Ice class gas carriers. The first one - "Christophe de Margerie" seems ... and there is a whole series behind it ... And then how to carry LNG from Yamal?
                1. +4
                  7 June 2020 23: 46
                  Quote: Mountain Shooter
                  Just builds. Ice class gas carriers

                  Novatek orders - "There are already about 47 firm orders from this plant [Zvezda]. Novatek has contracted the lead and the first 4 gas carriers. The first of them will be commissioned in 2023. The total volume of the order is planned for 15. In the first quarter [2020] we will probably contract 10 more gas carriers. From 2022 to 2030 we intend to order 20 more gas carriers from Novatek "https://tass.ru/ekonomika/7436079
              3. +1
                8 June 2020 06: 13
                Because Gazprom is primarily about pipes. And LNG is Novatek
              4. +1
                9 June 2020 04: 07
                Quote: Rubi0
                This is a good remark why Gazprom is not investing in shipbuilding of gas carriers.

                Temporary workers will not invest in what does not bring immediate profit, in long-term projects and other crap. Perhaps it’s not the point, but look at the video on Yandex where Putin clarifies the cost of the new capacity with Potanin and compares this with the sum of the costs of eliminating the consequences of the accident in Norilsk and damaging it. You will understand - WHY?
                1. 0
                  9 June 2020 17: 17
                  We've probably been read. A couple of hours ago Gazprom signed an LNG agreement with Ust-Luga, also with gas processing and the separation of ethane fraction and other valuable components https://finance.rambler.ru/business/44313961/?utm_content=finance_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
            3. +4
              7 June 2020 20: 15
              Quote: opus
              they see in the world, but they can’t count everything

              ett do not consider ett draw)))))))
              there is no cheaper gas pipe, the rest is dumping and makli
          2. 0
            7 June 2020 17: 27
            Can. But not forever.
      2. -1
        7 June 2020 15: 46
        Pipes for SP-2 have long been in warehouses in Europe.
      3. 0
        8 June 2020 18: 53
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        It seems that Power of Siberia -2 is becoming a reality. It becomes fast, fast. Where else can you put so many pipes? And the factories will surely be Russian? Although, recently it was ours who used ...

        Have you ever looked at a map?
        Where is Ukhta and Buguruslan located?

        What is Ukhta for Gazprom? Do you know?
        And where does everything go after Ukhta?
    7. +2
      7 June 2020 13: 53
      Tanks, planes ... Strength in the pipes! laughing
      1. 0
        7 June 2020 14: 32
        Quote: Tuzik
        Tanks, planes ... Strength in the pipes! laughing

        Wings, legs. Tail! feel
    8. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        7 June 2020 14: 04
        Gazprom is a national treasure!


        You will not name the nation?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            7 June 2020 14: 22
            Quote: Super
            And what is incomprehensible. The people of Russia.

            Are you sure? wassat
          2. -1
            7 June 2020 14: 43
            Quote: Super
            The people of Russia

            well if of the people then yes. But, in reality, the state, represented by its state agency Rosimushchestvo, directly owns 38,37% of the giant’s shares,
            Source: https://fishki.net/2433081-gazprom-nacionalynoe-dostojanie-rossii.html?sign=822292760141775%2C456444898032457 © Fishki.net
            So yes, no. (Not Perceptible)
            1. +4
              7 June 2020 15: 06
              In reality, 50,23%
              https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.interfax.ru/amp/661315
              1. -3
                7 June 2020 15: 23
                Quote: pogis
                In reality, 50,23%
                https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.interfax.ru/amp/661315

                Less google, more truth. request
            2. -2
              7 June 2020 15: 10
              In reality, the state, represented by its state agency Rosimushchestvo, owns 38,37% of the shares


              There is still Rosneftegaz OJSC with 10 percent of Gazprom, but it is not entirely state-owned.
              But these are, without a doubt, private traders (German, Russian, Ukrainian and American. I don’t presume to name Madame Baturina-Luzhkova's nation, but she has a trifle - only 1% of the "heritage of Russia" laughing )
              Of the one hundred percent of Gazprom shares, private owners no doubt:
              25,6% - other persons
              23.4% .- holders of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) of Gazprom, traded on US exchanges. ADRs are shares of non-state companies that hold and trade state banks.
          3. +3
            7 June 2020 17: 38
            That's just out of curiosity, excuse me: have you got at least one plus post? laughing
    9. -10
      7 June 2020 14: 12
      Well, yes you can stretch the pipeline to Argentina and pile on sanctions. the main thing is to promise. But how can the Chinese freeze completely without our gas.
      In Siberia, coal is not everywhere, even if the gas pipe is nearby. But the promised partners must be given.
    10. -2
      7 June 2020 14: 17
      The pipe will be put through space to ignore sanctions! laughing
    11. -4
      7 June 2020 14: 22
      Quote: 4ekist
      Unless of course, there is something to buy. And there is someone to earn. You can not worry about this.

      Yes buy 200 r share laughing
      1. +1
        7 June 2020 19: 46
        Quote: Gennady Fomkin
        Yes buy 200 r share

        These are common stocks and minimal income on them, so you won’t earn a lot of money on annual dividend payments. But for long-term investments, it makes sense to buy these shares, because the market value will increase, which means that in addition to dividends, you will also earn on the exchange rate difference.
    12. -1
      7 June 2020 14: 28
      In the USA, it’s probably super profitable to transport resources from the other side of the planet from a country with a high production cost in order to sell them at dumping prices. There is still a store in Germany, probably. There, too, there is Russian gas, expensive, and there you have to buy in the end. Why sell the Poles directly cheaply, if you can let the Germans sell them expensive, making Merkel nice? So I think there is no need to spoil the Poles. Bhhh. laughing
    13. +4
      7 June 2020 14: 36
      For Russian pipe plants this is an excellent order
    14. -4
      7 June 2020 14: 47
      Let's see what the gasket between the East and the West will sing after this news, which, like, sold a rusty pipe to Gazprom for 5 lard. laughing
    15. -1
      7 June 2020 15: 02
      Well done, it’s not just that))
    16. +1
      7 June 2020 15: 03
      Pipes, pipes, pipes did not have time
      From the dew of silver bend.
      And such gentle tunes, oh
      For some reason, they pour right into the heart.
      drinks
    17. -3
      7 June 2020 15: 12
      GAZPROM ... either pan or gone ...
    18. +1
      7 June 2020 15: 18
      Quote: ccsr
      But based on the fact that the SP-2 will be completed, it is possible that their funds will appear. So it’s better to buy Gazprom shares for long-term investments.

      And based on the fact that the grandmother will have male sexual characteristics, then, perhaps, she will become a grandfather
      1. -2
        7 June 2020 16: 32
        This is the point of exchange trading.
    19. +2
      7 June 2020 15: 22
      Quote: Tuzik
      Tanks, planes ... Strength in the pipes! laughing

      Comrade steelworkers! Our strength is in our swimming trunks!
    20. -1
      7 June 2020 15: 27
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Or before consumption, you need to degrease, to the skin?

      And rub to full
    21. -4
      7 June 2020 15: 31
      Quote: Yezhov
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      recently begun construction of the Kovykta-Chayanda gas pipeline.

      The thing is the pipe.
      Everything is calm, everything is the way
      The whole country is a big Gazprom!

      If Gaza is not in the country, he deflated in pince-nez .. laughing
      And it's time to scream, so it always has been !!!
      But we don’t want to shout and who we need to plant ..
      Here are such things, always in our heads! soldier

      I am a poet! I am a dunno. From me to you - balalaika hi
    22. -2
      7 June 2020 15: 45
      The Russian company Gazprom invest announced the purchase of pipes in the amount of 100 billion rubles... Gazprom invest is ready to pay for them no more 98 millionand rubles.

      Nevermind did not understand in this math. How much did you buy?
    23. BAI
      -1
      7 June 2020 15: 50
      I didn’t think that everything was so bad. There are no new projects, everything has been purchased for existing construction projects. One Bulgarian stock is worth what. This means that large, very large, overhauls of main gas pipelines are coming. There was information that the wear of the Moscow ring gas pipeline is 90%. Worse than in Ukraine.
    24. +4
      7 June 2020 16: 03
      Nearly 1,3 million tons of pipes, depending on specification, will be supplied to various sites. In particular, for the Power of Siberia gas trunkline, for the Ukhta-Torzhok and Bovanenkovo-Ukhta gas trunkline system. The customer indicated delivery warehouses: Ryzdvyany, Buguruslan, Ukhta, Romanovo.
      Purchase is carried out in one lot. Applications for participation in the tender are accepted until June 15, the results will be announced on June 16.

      https://ria.ru/20200607/1572584603.html?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2Fnews
    25. +4
      7 June 2020 17: 19
      They are purchasing for Power of Siberia-2. Contractors rub their hands wink
    26. 0
      7 June 2020 18: 38
      Need to be happy for the contractors? And if you carefully look at who they are, then it becomes clear how the business works.
    27. -3
      7 June 2020 18: 45
      Has Gazprom decided to buy pipes from itself or from those especially close to the emperor? Something this scheme resembles a cut
    28. -2
      7 June 2020 18: 59
      So far, the largest deals on the LDP market have been contracts between Gazprom Komplektatsiya and Zagorsk Pipe Plant for the supply of 500 thousand tons for 41 billion rubles (for the Kovykta-Chayanda gas pipeline - it is currently being built) and with Trubnaya Metallurgical company "for 255 thousand tons for 21 billion rubles (for the expansion of the Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok highway). Do not forget twenty-five million high-tech jobs by 2020.
    29. -1
      7 June 2020 19: 04
      Yes, against the background of the news that there is no gas, that is, proven reserves are not enough! laughing
      1. 0
        7 June 2020 19: 56
        It’s just that this news from the category is inflated from the fly of a mammoth - people are waving.
    30. 0
      7 June 2020 19: 37
      Ryzdvyany settlement, Izobilnensky district. Stavropol Territory. The beginning of the Blue Streams 1. And 2.
      1. +1
        8 June 2020 19: 16
        Quote: ANDREI MIKHAILOV_2
        Ryzdvyany settlement, Izobilnensky district. Stavropol Territory. The beginning of the Blue Streams 1. And 2.


        This is the sorting center of the Krasnodar bush of Gazprom. Replacing internal pipes so that exports do not stop.
        1. +2
          8 June 2020 19: 17
          The North Stavropol Underground Gas Storage (UGS) - the largest in the world, holds up to 90 billion cubic meters. m of active gas. There is just a compressor station, at the station.
          1. 0
            8 June 2020 19: 31
            Quote: ANDREI MIKHAILOV_2
            The North Stavropol Underground Gas Storage (UGS) - the largest in the world, holds up to 90 billion cubic meters. m of active gas. There is just a compressor station, at the station.


            Cut sturgeon every 10 ...

            90 billion is the sum of all Gazprom’s storage facilities throughout the country and Europe as a whole.
            1. +2
              8 June 2020 19: 39
              Gazprom’s official website to help you, my father worked the kingdom of heaven, it’s in Ryzdvyan there all his life, by the way it was under the USSR, most of them worked there from Bulgaria. And leave it for sturgeon.
              1. 0
                8 June 2020 19: 44
                Quote: ANDREI MIKHAILOV_2
                Gazprom’s official website to help you, my father worked the kingdom of heaven, it’s in Ryzdvyan there all his life, by the way it was under the USSR, most of them worked there from Bulgaria. And leave it for sturgeon.


                I have been working near Gazprom for several years.
                Repeatedly visited the UGS for work.
                The largest in the Russian Federation - Kasimovskoye UGS facility - there are less than 10.
                In January-February this year was at the Punginsky UGS facility and the Punginsky compressor station.
                He also visited the Subpolar, Ortyagun, Gubkinsky, Purpeyskaya, Aghansky, Priobsky and Yagenet CS.
                Will you tell me that your father is talking about Bulgarians?

                You are a liar ...
                Just lying.
                1. +2
                  8 June 2020 19: 53
                  Read the capacity, the storage I was born and raised in the city of Izobilnoy. It is a pity that you are far away.
                  1. +1
                    8 June 2020 19: 58
                    Quote: ANDREI MIKHAILOV_2
                    Read the capacity, the storage I was born and raised in the city of Izobilnoy. It is a pity that you are far away.


                    You're right. I'm sorry.
                    Just for me, these are two different UGS facilities.
                    Very surprised by the figure of 90.
                    Here, apparently at the time of the "lack of analogs in the world", they again counted all the voids in the region. All formations, horizons and layers.
                    For storage above 10 in fact there is nowhere else in the Russian Federation.
                    Do not upload anymore.
                    1. +1
                      8 June 2020 20: 02
                      Everything is fine, come to our south, eat sturgeon.
                2. +2
                  8 June 2020 19: 55
                  The North Stavropol Underground Gas Storage (UGS) - the largest in the world, holds up to 90 billion cubic meters. m of active gas. The daily volume of fuel withdrawn can reach 190 million cubic meters. The UGS facility was created on the basis of a depleted multilayer gas field 30 km from Stavropol. You have the same attitude to Gazprom as I do to ballet. Your main criterion is to outline the pseudo-facts in the right direction.
            2. +3
              8 June 2020 19: 42
              The North Stavropol Underground Gas Storage (UGS) - the largest in the world, holds up to 90 billion cubic meters. m of active gas. The daily volume of fuel withdrawn can reach 190 million cubic meters. The UGS facility was created on the basis of a depleted multilayer gas field 30 km from Stavropol.

              In 1956, a self-financing gas field No. 1 was organized as part of the Stavropolgaz trust. Over the years of development of the Stavropol fields, it has been possible to produce more than 200 billion cubic meters. m of blue fuel. But by 1979, gas reserves of the North Stavropol field began to run low. Thanks to a strategically significant location, a successful combination of geological factors and a ready-made infrastructure, they decided to turn it into a huge underground gas storage.
    31. 0
      7 June 2020 20: 54
      It would be very good if the comrade’s comrades drew attention to the idle plant in Khartsyzsk - the Khartsyzsk tube rolling plant, which makes very high-quality pipes of a larger diameter .. At one time, this plant was the only one producing pipes of a larger diameter, but when it got into Akhmetov’s structures, he lost the Russian market, and after that in D N R it is one of the city-forming factories., but Russia needs its products and I think the slow-thinking Gazprom should look in the direction of Khartsyzsk.
      1. 0
        7 June 2020 23: 25
        Silur, a steel wire in Khartsyzk, has already been launched (which is across the street from the pipe plant). Let's hope that it will come to trumpet too. The most powerful plant, once of the union value was. Of course, you should hurry up before the specialists have left. However, there is one more problem. If I am not mistaken, they received metal earlier from Mariupol, and now it is in Europe. The local metallurgists, it seems, also do not have a lot of orders.
    32. 0
      8 June 2020 21: 43
      this is a payment to the Germans (re-elected Schroeder) for lobbying the Second Stream. they will certainly win the tender

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"