Russian strike UAV “Okhotnik” will be insured for a substantial amount


The Russian heavy strike UAV “Okhotnik” (S-70) will be insured. This prototype exists so far in a single copy.


An application for a drone insurance service appeared on the government services website. The amount of insurance is almost 1,3 billion rubles.

The customer who placed the application was Sukhoi, which is a structural unit of the United Aircraft Corporation.

The draft agreement noted that the insured event would be death, missing or damage to the device. The validity of the insurance will be seven months from the date of conclusion of the contract. Upon the occurrence of an insured event, the customer receives 1278 million rubles. Why exactly such an amount appears in a potential contract is not reported.

The document stipulates that during the term of the contract the drone will be used exclusively on Russian territory. It is assumed that he can perform demonstration, test, familiarization and training flights. In addition, it is allowed to carry out engine development, taxiing of the UAV and investigate the operation of its ground-based systems.

The drone manufacturer accepts applications from insurers until June 15. The initial cost of the service will be 83 million rubles.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy 3 June 2020 14: 15 New
    • 10
    • 23
    -13
    Russian strike UAV “Okhotnik” will be insured for a substantial amount
    fool fool fool Do we make money? And only 1,3; not 10 larls?
    1. Samara 3 June 2020 14: 18 New
      • 3
      • 23
      -20
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Russian strike UAV “Okhotnik” will be insured for a substantial amount
      fool fool fool Do we make money?

      Along the way! Although I think this is fake .. Now it starts here hi
      neolibers are not asleep ..)))
      1. SRC P-15 3 June 2020 14: 50 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Russian strike UAV “Okhotnik” will be insured for a substantial amount

        The more substantial the insurance amount, the more sophisticated the UAV seems? what
        1. 4ekist 3 June 2020 15: 54 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          A good idea. Do, insure and break. If only insurers are in collusion with manufacturers.
        2. Samara 3 June 2020 16: 04 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Russian strike UAV “Okhotnik” will be insured for a substantial amount

          The more substantial the insurance amount, the more sophisticated the UAV seems? what

          In the Russian Army, as it is not customary to insure military equipment, especially for such an amount.
          We are not the USA! Is Israel hustling there again.)))?
    2. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 14: 20 New
      • 12
      • 5
      +7
      tests. this is a common practice. which means that in these 7 months they probably want to try it in some serious regimes. The Su-57 fighter, which crashed in the Khabarovsk Territory, was insured, the RIA Novosti was told in the press service of the United Aircraft Corporation.
    3. Civil 3 June 2020 14: 20 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      Property must be protected, we will insure anyone. And do not climb where they did not ask. laughing
    4. K-612-O 3 June 2020 14: 20 New
      • 14
      • 2
      +12
      Well, you know, this is just a competent approach, especially with new technology, at the prototype stage. MO, in a crash, will not give money for a new one
    5. URAL72 3 June 2020 14: 22 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      This is the price of the Su-34, is it really that expensive?
      1. K-612-O 3 June 2020 14: 28 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        $ 19 million for the prototype is quite an acceptable amount. Development always costs several times more than a serial product, plus the costs of testing equipment and landfills are included. This is a canon from which not one developer will come out.
      2. Herman 4223 3 June 2020 15: 02 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        It is larger than it in size. There was a photo where he stood next to the entire lineup of Su on the Internet.
        A complicated experimental apparatus, as for me the insurance amount is even small.
        1. Starover_Z 3 June 2020 15: 33 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Herman 4223
          A complicated experimental apparatus, as for me the insurance amount is even small.

          And with serial production to insure! And whoever knocks - let them pay! Photo and video shooting "Hunter" for any will be engaged, so that the shooter can be identified and presented! (Joke!)
          1. Herman 4223 3 June 2020 17: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Can be presented as damage to the losing side. The joke is good. True, insurance companies first go broke.
    6. dauria 3 June 2020 14: 28 New
      • 5
      • 12
      -7
      Do we make money?


      So what ? Take a risk with a billion - you can earn 83 million in 7 months.
      as much as 6% with a tail. For a year, maybe 10% will run. wassat Cool roulette. I'm better off in Las Vegas. However, Gref is not a sin to risk public money. Pay insurance and share it with the owner of the "Hunter".
      1. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 14: 34 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        how do you imagine it? and what does Gref have to do with it? he is the chairman of the bank and not the insurance company.
        1. dauria 3 June 2020 14: 46 New
          • 5
          • 9
          -4
          how do you imagine it?

          And how are you ? The private trader will risk his billion to earn 10% per annum? Yes, he will earn these 10% without risk. So they will risk not their own, but state. And where to get them, except from Gref? laughing
          1. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 14: 55 New
            • 8
            • 4
            +4
            Dry wants to insure. he is a member of the KLA. more than 90 percent belongs to the state. what private traders are you talking about ?. I don’t know through whom, but I think it will be Sogaz since through it all servicemen are insured
            1. dauria 3 June 2020 15: 24 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Dry wants to insure. he is a member of the KLA. more than 90 percent belongs to the state. What private traders are you talking about?


              Hmm ... hard. Dry here at all does not risk anything. Private or sovereign, do not care. The risk is one who agrees to insure. And earn at this risk only 10% per annum. Who in their right mind would take a chance personal money, when next to 10% they earn without risk at all on reinforced concrete stocks and government bonds? If this transaction takes place under these conditions, it is either the stupidity of the insurer or a scam. Stupid with money, I have not seen. Money swindlers - as many as you want.
              1. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 16: 18 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                insurance risks are a whole science. everything is miscalculated there at a very serious level. insured events in the contract are checked up to each comma. statistics are collected and analysts work. the principle of insurance is essentially the same as in a casino. The size of the contribution is calculated by the insurance company so that the amount of all payments is no more than 75-80% of all received contributions. Do you understand? now everything is insured. submarines and aircraft. etc. etc. all military personnel. and all this is likely in one place. which for insurers minimizes risks.
    7. Piramidon 3 June 2020 15: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      And only 1,3; not 10 larls?

      Then, insurance would not have to pay 83 million, but much more.
  2. Threaded screw 3 June 2020 14: 17 New
    • 3
    • 9
    -6
    exists so far in a single copy.
    And the parade is just around the corner.
    1. K-612-O 3 June 2020 14: 22 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      The thread got ripped off
  3. Doccor18 3 June 2020 14: 17 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Upon the occurrence of an insured event, the customer receives 1278 million rubles. Why exactly such an amount appears in a potential contract is not reported.

    How much they spent, I would like to return so much ... if that.
  4. AlexDetto 3 June 2020 14: 20 New
    • 6
    • 12
    -6
    Well here, either they are so unsure of their development, or they are laundering loot. And both cases are sad ... sad
    1. A009 3 June 2020 14: 25 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      This is why in Europe, and especially in America, fear all the way to the ass. From uncertainty
      1. AlexDetto 3 June 2020 14: 31 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        Capitalism he is laughing
        Well, we are not talking about Europe and America, you understand how everything is done here and why ...
        And how stupid it is for me to insure a military strike UAV. BTRs do not insure. They would even Kalash began to insure ...
        1. knn54 3 June 2020 14: 38 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Maybe in case of "hijacking"?
          1. AlexDetto 3 June 2020 14: 39 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            It would be funny if you steal it from a military airfield))
        2. Grishavs 3 June 2020 14: 38 New
          • 3
          • 6
          -3
          And the soldiers, as always, will be forgotten to insure ...
          1. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 14: 44 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            all military personnel are insured by default. don't talk nonsense.
            1. Andrfg 3 June 2020 14: 47 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Well, yes, only this insurance is nonsense. This is my personal opinion.
              1. Marconi41 3 June 2020 15: 07 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: AndrFG
                Well, yes, only this insurance is nonsense. This is my personal opinion.

                Do not know, do not speak. For each insured event, military personnel receive fairly substantial insurance. I know for myself. (Broken leg).
                1. carstorm 11 3 June 2020 15: 26 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  I remember a slight mutilation was about 70000 thousand three years ago. more now. disability of 3 working groups and it can be obtained by losing one finger about 700000
  5. Pvi1206 3 June 2020 14: 53 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    I wonder what the insurance cost ... military secret? ...
    1. Marconi41 3 June 2020 15: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Pvi1206
      I wonder what the insurance cost ... military secret? ...

      The answer can be found in the public domain, not a secret.
  6. Break through 3 June 2020 15: 02 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Mega cool drone good
  7. really 3 June 2020 15: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Risk assessment is about a quarter of the insurance amount.
  8. askort154 3 June 2020 15: 32 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The Russian heavy strike UAV “Okhotnik” (S-70) will be insured. This prototype exists so far in a single copy.

    It seems that the Su-57 accident prompted this. He did not have time to transfer MO and all the costs of his losses fell on the manufacturer. Now the corporation has decided to play it safe with a single copy of the S-70. It is a reasonable decision.
    1. Samara 3 June 2020 16: 09 New
      • 0
      • 8
      -8
      Quote: askort154
      Now the corporation has decided to play it safe with a single copy of the S-70. It is a reasonable decision.

      Well ..And the policyholder, who? Another cash withdrawal scheme from Russia? The article is provocative and this is definitely .. negative
      P / S "Hunter" is still a secret development ... And here they are trying to identify those who are associated with this .. Man, do not give in !!
      Fear Danians giving gifts ..
  9. JD1979 3 June 2020 15: 49 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    I strongly doubt that there is a company that decides to give developers 1,2 billion. Based on the subject of insurance, the chances of getting into payments are 99,9%. The UAC may have a desire, only the bad ones are not kept in the insurance business.
  10. gridasov 3 June 2020 16: 08 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    I believe that it is necessary to insure only as much as possible the loss of intellectual priority on the product, and not on what will break. And in this case there is nothing that has a fundamental novelty. This means banal money laundering and of course it will happen to him
    1. Paranoid50 3 June 2020 16: 59 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: gridasov
      it is necessary to insure only as much as possible the loss of intellectual priority on the product, and not on what is broken. AND

      belay Gridasov, try again to read what they wrote - maybe let it go. yes laughing
      Quote: gridasov
      commonplace money laundering and of course happen to him

      What a horror ... When did you manage to slide down to the dense philistine? But I want to believe in the best, namely that just someone broke Gridasov’s account. wassat
      1. gridasov 3 June 2020 17: 06 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Ha! You see, amused. As the Sage said, in this world you can live in peace only under the guise of ugliness and dementia
  11. Lord of the Sith 3 June 2020 20: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Like in the song:
    Insure your brother, insure))
  12. mortido 3 June 2020 23: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I am interested in the moment with reinsurance the cost of a significant secret object, how it will be decided by sanctions, that is, we have an internal reinsurance market, or everything is sent to the West as before, in all sorts of Lloyds.
  13. Pandiurin 3 June 2020 23: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Small companies need insurance to eliminate the fatal consequences of force majeure. (For example, the only transport ship drowned)
    If bankruptcy is not insured.

    Big companies are not in danger. But they include risks in the price of the service. For example, the sender pays for some of the cargo insurance options.

    Why MO needs this is not clear. If small force majeure, then it’s like an elephant to them. And insurance premiums are many times higher than payments.
    And if there is a megafors major then the insurance company will not be able to pay or state assistance will be required. Anyway, the state will pay. Waste of money.

    The only thing that comes to mind is not the desire of officials in the Moscow Region to be responsible in cases of major failures.
    So it would be possible for a large financial loss to be brought to justice, and so you can otmazyvatsya, well, like yes it did not work, but we have everything insured.
  14. Archivist Vasya 4 June 2020 16: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, now they’ll definitely smash ... am to insure the same.
  15. jaroff 4 June 2020 16: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And so excited? The previous insurance has ended, they are making out a new one, nothing more. The usual practice is no different from car insurance.