In China, a dispute arose over a new photo of the J-20 fighter


In the Chinese segment of the Internet published noteworthy pictures with the flight operations on fighters of the new generation J-20. The photographs depict the combat aircraft put into service by the PLA Air Force, under whose wings you can see the pylons. They are designated as PF15.


Chinese experts claim that these pylons were equipped with missiles that were used to hit targets at a landfill.

It is important to note here that just a few days ago, China received information about testing J-20 fighters with outboard fuel tanks when it was possible to maneuver and increase the radius of combat use.

In this regard, a dispute arose around a new photo. So, it is suggested that the new pylons also do not mean that the J-20 tested air-to-surface missiles and aviation bombs, and about testing flight modes with additional fuel tanks on an external sling.

In China, a dispute arose over a new photo of the J-20 fighter

Photo: Sina.com.cn


It is noted that in any case, testing of the "additional features" of the J-20 fighter is in progress. It is entirely possible that the PLA Air Force is not particularly comfortable with both the range of combat use of these fighters and the amount of weapons that they can carry in the internal compartments.
Photos used:
Weibo / 秋秋 Q30, sina.com.cn
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uncle lee 2 June 2020 14: 34 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    China has a dispute
    Well, let them argue in China ... belay
    1. Civil 2 June 2020 15: 00 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      China has a dispute
      Well, let them argue in China ... belay

      There are in kind 1 people there.
      1. Uncle lee 2 June 2020 15: 02 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        There is someone to do this business smile
        1. Shurik70 2 June 2020 18: 30 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Even if one in a million ...
      2. Vasyan1971 2 June 2020 15: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Civil
        There are in kind 1 people there.

        And who counted them? wassat
        https://aif.ru/politics/world/demograficheskiy_vzryv_ili_mistifikaciya_skolko_na_samom_dele_kitaycev
      3. Sochi 3 June 2020 11: 26 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        According to UNESCO, China will not be able to feed a population of more than 500 by producing and purchasing food ...
        1. smart fellow 3 June 2020 22: 31 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Therefore, China provides the entire Far East of Russia with vegetables and pork.
          1. Sochi 4 June 2020 16: 38 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Oh well ... Lukashenko also said that he provided 177 countries with dairy products ...
    2. Starover_Z 2 June 2020 16: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It is entirely possible that the PLA Air Force is not particularly comfortable with both the range of combat use of these fighters and the amount of weapons that they can carry in the internal compartments.

      But the most, 5 generations, even with "+"as here we were quoted several times from the publications of the Chinese media!
  2. KVU-NSVD 2 June 2020 14: 39 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    So what did the pylons attach to? There will be a need for stealth - everything will be removed, there will be no need for a small EPR - they use all the useful payload in full. Quite a reasonable approach. I think on the Su-57 similar options experienced
    1. Threaded screw 2 June 2020 15: 32 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      So what, what did the pylons attach to? There will be a need for stealth - everything will be removed
      It’s just that people on their kimonos were tearing that the Su-57 is the 4th generation, the F-35 coating is junk, but we can’t do everything in stealth, in the internal compartments, and in general, one J-20 is better than five F22 and that's it in this spirit, but it turns out that the Air Force’s own are not particularly happy, and here the pilots were drawn, there the propeller can be screwed up, let's see what happens next.
      1. Starover_Z 2 June 2020 16: 28 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Threaded Screw
        It’s just that people on their kimonos were tearing that the Su-57 is the 4th generation, the F-35 coating is junk, but we can’t do everything in stealth, in the internal compartments, and in general, one J-20 is better than five F22 and that's it like that

        After reading the article and these words from the Screw I remembered - Chinese Auto Show
  3. Thrifty 2 June 2020 14: 44 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    This proves only one thing - the Chinese craft does not suit the Chinese army in the stealth version due to weak performance characteristics.
    1. parkello 2 June 2020 14: 52 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      probably . won fu-35 too, in the beast mode more often used than as an invisibility. so are they ... this stealth probably worsens the payload greatly request
  4. Pessimist22 2 June 2020 15: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, they are universal, the Chinese will make any adapters.
  5. knn54 2 June 2020 15: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Is the "20" radius less than the F-22 or F-35? Fuel "intermeddle" even more without hanging tanks.
  6. Vasyan1971 2 June 2020 15: 45 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The photographs depict the combat aircraft put into service by the PLA Air Force, under whose wings you can see the pylons. They are designated as PF15.

    So the vaunted invisibility ended, on which all those who are not lazy fell.
    and about testing flight modes with additional fuel tanks on an external sling.

    In the photo with tanks and the photo with pylons - their different number, sort of. Not? Badly seen ...
    1. Reserve buildbat 2 June 2020 17: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In the photo with tanks - 2 pylons. In the photo with 4 pylons, 2 are definitely missile (the "rails" are visible), the other 2 are rather flimsy for such large tanks. Remind our launchers for R-3 (K-13)
      1. Vasyan1971 2 June 2020 18: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: stock buildbat
        In the photo with 4 pylons, 2 are definitely missile ("rails" are visible)

        In-of, then it did not seem. And someone didn’t like it ... laughing
        1. Reserve buildbat 2 June 2020 18: 24 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          It happens ... Some crowds of “minusers” of everything and everyone run around here periodically, who just silently throw “sleepers” and dump them. Apparently due to a lack of intelligence.
          1. Vasyan1971 2 June 2020 18: 25 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: stock buildbat
            Here, some crowds of "minusers" periodically run around

            Drooling at them. ©
            1. Reserve buildbat 2 June 2020 18: 27 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              I agree.
              The dog barks (minus) - the wind (site) wears laughing
  7. aviator6768 3 June 2020 00: 45 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Call one military conflict with the Chinese - we will continue to discuss all their military achievements ... There were a lot of them in Damascus (like the destroyers in the spratly area when the American destroyer appeared recently ...)
  8. aviator6768 3 June 2020 00: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Yes, (who will oppose there) - they did not copy the VNA AL-41M1m blades ... (I mean that all of ours, and American academicians, simply LAUGH over the Chinese)
  9. tolmachiev51 3 June 2020 04: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The clone was too “gluttonous” - however, pylons for hanging tanks!