In China, a dispute arose over a new photo of the J-20 fighter

25

In the Chinese segment of the Internet published noteworthy pictures with the flight operations on fighters of the new generation J-20. The photographs depict the combat aircraft put into service by the PLA Air Force, under whose wings you can see the pylons. They are designated as PF15.

Chinese experts claim that these pylons were equipped with missiles that were used to hit targets at a landfill.



It is important to note here that just a few days ago, China received information about testing J-20 fighters with outboard fuel tanks when it was possible to maneuver and increase the radius of combat use.

In this regard, a dispute arose around a new photo. So, it is suggested that the new pylons also do not mean that the J-20 tested air-to-surface missiles and aviation bombs, and about testing flight modes with additional fuel tanks on an external sling.

In China, a dispute arose over a new photo of the J-20 fighter

Photo: Sina.com.cn


It is noted that in any case, testing of the "additional features" of the J-20 fighter is in progress. It is entirely possible that the PLA Air Force is not particularly comfortable with both the range of combat use of these fighters and the amount of weapons that they can carry in the internal compartments.
  • Weibo / 秋秋 Q30, sina.com.cn
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    2 June 2020 14: 34
    China has a dispute
    Well, let them argue in China ... belay
    1. +2
      2 June 2020 15: 00
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      China has a dispute
      Well, let them argue in China ... belay

      There are in kind 1 people there.
      1. +2
        2 June 2020 15: 02
        There is someone to do this business smile
        1. +2
          2 June 2020 18: 30
          Even if one in a million ...
      2. 0
        2 June 2020 15: 49
        Quote: Civil
        There are in kind 1 people there.

        And who counted them? wassat
        https://aif.ru/politics/world/demograficheskiy_vzryv_ili_mistifikaciya_skolko_na_samom_dele_kitaycev
      3. +1
        3 June 2020 11: 26
        According to UNESCO, China will not be able to feed a population of more than 500 by producing and purchasing food ...
        1. 0
          3 June 2020 22: 31
          Therefore, China provides the entire Far East of Russia with vegetables and pork.
          1. 0
            4 June 2020 16: 38
            Oh well ... Lukashenko also said that he provided 177 countries with dairy products ...
    2. +1
      2 June 2020 16: 13
      It is entirely possible that the PLA Air Force is not particularly comfortable with both the range of combat use of these fighters and the amount of weapons that they can carry in the internal compartments.

      But the most, 5 generations, even with "+"How here we were repeatedly quoted the words from the publications of the Chinese media!
  2. +13
    2 June 2020 14: 39
    So what did the pylons attach to? There will be a need for stealth - everything will be removed, there will be no need for a small EPR - they use all the useful payload in full. Quite a reasonable approach. I think on the Su-57 similar options experienced
    1. +3
      2 June 2020 15: 32
      So what, what did the pylons attach to? There will be a need for stealth - everything will be removed
      It’s just that people on their kimonos were tearing that the Su-57 is the 4th generation, the F-35 coating is junk, but we can’t do everything in stealth, in the internal compartments, and in general, one J-20 is better than five F22 and that's it in this spirit, but it turns out that the Air Force’s own are not particularly happy, and here the pilots were drawn, there the propeller can be screwed up, let's see what happens next.
      1. +1
        2 June 2020 16: 28
        Quote: Threaded screw
        It’s just that people on their kimonos were tearing that the Su-57 is the 4th generation, the F-35 coating is junk, but we can’t do everything in stealth, in the internal compartments, and in general, one J-20 is better than five F22 and that's it like that

        After reading the article and these words from the Screw I remembered - Chinese Auto Show
  3. +5
    2 June 2020 14: 44
    This proves only one thing - the Chinese handicraft does not suit the Chinese army in the "stealth" version due to weak performance characteristics.
    1. 0
      2 June 2020 14: 52
      likely . Won Fu-35, too, in beast mode is more often used than as invisibility. so they ... probably greatly worsens the payload this "stealth" request
  4. 0
    2 June 2020 15: 07
    Yes, they are universal, the Chinese will make any adapters.
  5. +1
    2 June 2020 15: 09
    Is it possible that the "20" has a smaller range than the F-22 or F-35? The fuel "intermeddle" even more and without external tanks.
  6. 0
    2 June 2020 15: 45
    The photographs depict the combat aircraft put into service by the PLA Air Force, under whose wings you can see the pylons. They are designated as PF15.

    So the vaunted invisibility ended, on which all those who are not lazy fell.
    and about testing flight modes with additional fuel tanks on an external sling.

    In the photo with tanks and the photo with pylons - their different number, sort of. Not? Badly seen ...
    1. +1
      2 June 2020 17: 17
      In the photo with tanks - 2 pylons. In the photo with 4 pylons, 2 are absolutely rocket ("rails" are visible), the other 2 look flimsy for such large tanks. Remind our launchers for R-3 (K-13)
      1. 0
        2 June 2020 18: 22
        Quote: Stroibat stock
        In the photo with 4 pylons, 2 are definitely rocket ones (you can see the "rails")

        In-of, then it did not seem. And someone didn’t like it ... laughing
        1. 0
          2 June 2020 18: 24
          It happens ... Here from time to time some crowds of "minusers" of everything and everything run around, who just silently throw "sleepers" and dump. Apparently due to the lack of intelligence.
          1. -1
            2 June 2020 18: 25
            Quote: Stroibat stock
            There are periodically running around some crowd of "minusers"

            Drooling at them. ©
            1. -1
              2 June 2020 18: 27
              I agree.
              The dog barks (minus) - the wind (site) wears laughing
  7. +1
    3 June 2020 00: 45
    Call one military conflict with the Chinese - we will continue to discuss all their military achievements ... There were a lot of them in Damascus (like the destroyers in the spratly area when the American destroyer appeared recently ...)
  8. +2
    3 June 2020 00: 48
    Yes, (who will oppose there) - they did not copy the VNA AL-41M1m blades ... (I mean that all of ours, and American academicians, simply LAUGH over the Chinese)
  9. 0
    3 June 2020 04: 41
    The clone turned out to be too "gluttonous" - but pylons for hanging tanks!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"