There are many venerable filmmakers, few high-quality cinema

There are many venerable filmmakers, few high-quality cinema

One of the topics that are often discussed is why, in the presence of a huge number of venerable directors, cameramen, scriptwriters, professional actors, in our country there are few really high-quality films made. At the same time, some are sure that there have been no such films for 30 years now at all. Others are less categorical and note that worthy films still come across, but only there are much fewer than we would like.


There is still a special group of people who engage in empty criticism. These are people who are accepted for publishing their own, exclusively critical and negative, views on a particular film, often without even watching the film itself. As an option - on the trailer. The result is clear: "I did not look, but I condemn."

Modern cinema is a controversial thing. Indeed, there is a whole scattering of excellent professionals, many of whom are still Soviet, canonical, and cinema schools. But the result is not always the same professionalism that “in the workbook” and in the list of awards.

One of the reasons for this lies not so much in the nature of the directors and actors themselves, as in the requests of modern society. These requests are directly related to the market, which, as it turned out, we have chosen for ourselves as the main ideology. And for the consumer society - and films are most often appropriate.

About the problems of domestic cinema of our days - Klim Zhukov on his YouTube channel:

Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sav
    sav 2 June 2020 08: 36 New
    • 15
    • 2
    +13
    My wife and I are constantly reviewing Soviet films, but there’s nothing to do with the “remake”
    1. Crowe 2 June 2020 09: 08 New
      • 18
      • 2
      +16
      Quote: sav
      "remake" something in any way

      Now they don’t know how to tear ... Actors play, as Stanislavsky would say - “I don’t believe”, playfully, tensely .. Falsehood is felt right away, I don’t want to look from the very first shots of the next “masterpiece” of the contemporary. And more .. .It is especially angry when they try to make remakes of Soviet films with a deep script and ingenious play of actors, I just want to say - you can’t, don’t torment me ..
      1. Altona 2 June 2020 09: 13 New
        • 14
        • 1
        +13
        Quote: Crowe
        Quote: sav
        "remake" something in any way

        Now they don’t know how to tear ...

        ------------------------
        Psychologism as an element of cinema is declared unformatted and thrown out as unnecessary. Today's "filmmakers" are filming stupid series with long dialogues about action and action, where the protagonist has no time to think and no reason to explain the reasons for his behavior. Therefore, modern cinema does not make sense to watch, it’s better to play a computer game right away. After a year since 2010, cinema has become very degraded.
      2. Pravodel 2 June 2020 09: 50 New
        • 14
        • 0
        +14
        This is not the first time that such a question has been raised in VO, but there is still no answer, although it is on the surface. For the answer, you do not need to compose huge dissertations with an endless bibliography, including all publications from the Nativity of Christ to this day, you do not need to sit in the halls of cinemas of all these meaningless "brands", festivals, congresses of moviegoers and just mans, etc., just look one of the masterpieces created by our great directors, for example, The Cranes Flying, the Ballad of a Soldier, and any of the latest films released on the screens to see the difference that makes our old Soviet films great and modern films insignificant, to see the difference in the actors' play, in directing, camera work and backup art. How can you imagine in the role of Alyosha in the Ballad about a soldier of another actor except V. Ivashov, and in modern films all the actors are on one face, there is no memorable. Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov can play in any film, and indeed anyone, if only the film is released. And what is going on with camera work: the absolute dominance of close-ups, even where it does not exist at all. Similarly with directing: these endless love stories that either make up the main plot, or supplement it for a better perception of the main line, while the main storyline goes far into the unknown. And the constant lies in the scenarios and in the directing, when, for example, the partisan band radio operator falls in love with a captured German and runs into the city to meet him, where, naturally, the Gestapo grabs her and puts her in a jail, from where she is taken out by a German who is in love with her. Horror and nothing more. Next, the voice acting. Either our universities have stopped producing sound engineers, or the equipment at the movie studios has all broken down. Everywhere the background, which should only accompany the dialogs, the screening of the film series has acquired an independent value that exceeds the main sound range. Sometimes behind the background you can’t even distinguish between the dialogues of the heroes. And so everywhere ...
        Where and when will madness be put to an end in cinema, and indeed in art working for the people's money of the Ministry of Culture? In the USSR, artists complained that they were not allowed to work, to create censorship, but at the same time, masterpieces were constantly being created that we enjoy even after 30 years of the collapse of the union. So if the mountain does not go to Magomed, Magomed goes to the mountain - it is worth introducing censorship in order to put an end to ugliness, yes, sometimes, obscurantism in art.
        Another point that indicates the state of modern cinema. In the USSR they worked for art and for the people, and not for festivals, to receive prizes, to hire in the west, didn’t do for the dough. Now the film is not successful if it cannot be rolled in the west and chop the dough. Hence, all the delights of modern cinema.
        1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 10: 01 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          You are about the actors, well, I don’t know, I don’t know ..., but the types are no more ...
          1. Pravodel 2 June 2020 10: 18 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Not only about actors, but also about directors, screenwriters, cameramen, sound engineers .. Everyone works not for art, but for the dough. And where there is loot, art is the least.
            1. Altona 2 June 2020 10: 47 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Quote: The Truth
              And where there is loot, art is the least.

              ---------------------
              You yourself answered the question about censorship. Because the skid of the dough who needs to immediately cancel the censorship framework.
        2. tihonmarine 2 June 2020 10: 12 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: The Truth
          In the USSR they worked for art and for the people, and not for festivals, prizes, rentals in the west, they did not work for the dough. Now the film is not successful if it cannot be rolled in the west and chop the dough.

          For me personally, this is news that the West is purchasing our films.
          1. Victorio 2 June 2020 12: 19 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: tihonmarine
            For me personally, this is news that the West is purchasing our films.

            ===
            despite ideological differences, they nonetheless bought. https://www.ivi.ru/titr/goodmovies/nashi-filmy-za-rubejom
        3. Kart 2 June 2020 11: 55 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          Quote: The Truth
          Another point that indicates the state of modern cinema. In the USSR they worked for art and for the people, and not for festivals, prizes, rentals in the west, they did not work for the dough.

          How to say. All the same, the actors in the USSR were paid, and not bad for successful roles.
          But firstly, for really successful ones, and secondly, not at all as much as today, some half-educated people are paid from the street just because they belong to the “creative elite”, or simply to the rich.
          1. tihonmarine 2 June 2020 14: 31 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Carte
            how today some half-educated people are paid from the street just because they belong to the “creative elite”, or simply to the rich.

            Why make a good movie if you pay good for a bad movie.
        4. your1970 2 June 2020 13: 34 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: The Truth
          And the constant lies in the scenarios and in the directing, when, for example, the partisan band radio operator falls in love with a captured German and runs into the city to meet him, where, naturally, the Gestapo grabs her and puts her in a jail, from where she is taken out by a German who is in love with her. Horror and nothing more.

          Right here only now??
          That is, when Solomin in "Die Hard" (1967) flew a balloon, and then destroyed the Nazis with regiments, is this true ??? Or when in the "Special Forces" bang bang, from a crossbow (!!!) -splat, breathe with pistols- breathe and there is no company of Germans- is also true ??
          Won .... apparently retreating to Stalingrad-to lure more Germans burdock?

          In the days of the USSR, too, there were a lot of the same crap movies about the war - as they are now. And nifiga censorship did not save ...
          It’s just that these crazy films were overlapped with real classics- “They Fought for the Motherland” (the greatest movie about the war in my opinion !!!) “, Only old people go into battle, Ballad about a soldier, Go and see, Check on the road ... .

          Putting your hand on your heart, now how many recall good films of the USSR about the war? Without the Internet? 15-20-30 pieces, no more ... and every year they shot at least a dozen about the war. And most of it passed and was instantly forgotten ....
          1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 14: 18 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: your1970
            Putting your hand on your heart, now how many recall good films of the USSR about the war? Without the Internet? 15-20-30 pieces, no more ... and every year they shot at least a dozen about the war. And most of it passed and was instantly forgotten ....

            If you remember half an hour more than fifty! And I consider the classics “In war as in war”, “Thirst”, “Star”, “Baltic sky”, “Cranes fly”, “On seven winds”, “They fought for their Motherland”, “Torpedo bombers”, “Liberation” , "And the dawns here are quiet," "Belorussky Train Station", "Officers" and further on the list, who wants to be able to continue
            1. your1970 2 June 2020 14: 39 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Trouble is that they were filmed a lot, at least 10 per year- GOOD my yes yours, well, plus 10-20 and that's all ... For 45 post-war years ...
          2. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 18: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Putting my hand below the pager, I want to note that the same “Die Hard” was lying on the “shelf”, I hope you are aware that there was such a shelf where unsuccessful kicks were put and only at the time of perestroika they were released into the “broad masses". ..
            1. your1970 2 June 2020 18: 50 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Skalendarka
              Putting my hand below the pager, I want to note that the same “Die Hard” was lying on the “shelf”, I hope you are aware that there was such a shelf where unsuccessful kicks were put and only at the time of perestroika they were released into the “broad masses". ..
              -I know lol ..there is only a trail - he hit the shelf - when "in 1971, Yefim Drabkin, who wrote the script, emigrated.", through 4 years after graduation ...
              and all art councils / literary committees / censorship quite a passed in 1967
              And yes - do you think the "Special Forces" is true about the war? A successful film? No one put it on the shelf .... all modern "Saboteurs" are its followers
              1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 21: 37 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I know that I watched about ,, detachment ... '', but I can’t remember.
                I once wrote that my father could not watch the film, “Two fighters, '' with M. Brnnes ...
                1. your1970 3 June 2020 00: 01 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  “Katyusha” was rescued by a wounded landing party from the OMSBON, and a mountain of Germans was killed. There is a remake of the same content
    2. Bar1 2 June 2020 09: 28 New
      • 16
      • 6
      +10
      everything in Putin’s Russia is deteriorating and there can be no other art. The colonial administration carries out orders from strangers who impose mediocrity, insipidity, nonsense, cultivating violence, vulgarity and outright stupidity through movies and TV.
      Who does Putin put at the head of the Ministry of Culture?
      Shvydkoi, Sokolov, Avdeev, Medinsky, Lyubimova. It seems to be different people, but the level of cinematography with them gradually decreased lower and lower.
      1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 14: 22 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Bar1
        everything in Putin’s Russia goes bad

        Colleague! You +100500 per comment !!! good drinks
  2. Pvi1206 2 June 2020 08: 40 New
    • 10
    • 1
    +9
    permissiveness does not lead to good / temple ..... in the USSR there were artistic councils that sifted through projects ... the best, as a rule ... remained uncensored ...
  3. Terenin 2 June 2020 08: 40 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Bad movie? Everything is simple. Unfortunately, now, Russian cinema, this huge industry has cut budget dough.
    1. Kuroneko 2 June 2020 08: 48 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Quote: Terenin
      Unfortunately, now, Russian cinema, this huge industry has cut budget dough.

      The problem is not only this. The problem is that in the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the domestic audience was taught (or taught - in the case of younger generations) to love CRESPECT. Watch Crap. Enjoy the JOB. Hackwork and lack of professionalism began to be considered the norm and quality.
      The box office of the same recent nedofilma-nedokomedii "Serf" clearly demonstrate this. = _ =
      People haws, cho.
      1. Terenin 2 June 2020 09: 12 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: Kuroneko
        Hackwork and lack of professionalism began to be considered the norm and quality.

        What is more surprising is that the film was created with the direct support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation fool
        Where are you, Soviet censorship !!!
      2. svp67 2 June 2020 10: 55 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Kuroneko
        The box office of the same recent nedofilma-nedokomedii "Serf" clearly demonstrate this. = _ =

        Didn’t you like him? Well then, watch the drama "On the Moon", the plot is similar, but told differently ...
    2. BARKAS 2 June 2020 09: 09 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      There, in addition to the budget dough, there is also money from liberal sponsors who order an ideology in the film, and ideology is always even in the dumbest movie.
    3. your1970 2 June 2020 13: 44 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Terenin
      Bad movie? Everything is simple. Unfortunately, now, Russian cinema, this is a huge industry sawing budget dough.

      There was a large article in the journal Man and Law in the 1980s about the thefts in the film industry of the USSR. There were a lot of cases of thefts - I just remembered that for example, only when shooting the scene of the execution of old Silantius in the Eternal Call, about 10 were stolen rubles, and all in the film about 000 were stolen. And that was a rather ordinary amount, were more significant. 200 then, this is not 000 million today, this is solid money ....
      Unfortunately, I don’t remember exactly the year (until 1984, my parents wrote out for sure) and number- but the article was big and devastating
      1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 14: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: your1970
        There was a large article in the journal Man and Law in the 1980s about the thefts in the film industry of the USSR. There were a lot of cases of thefts - I just remembered that for example, only when shooting the scene of the execution of old Silantius in the Eternal Call, about 10 were stolen rubles, and in total about 000 were stolen in the film.

        Colleague, you messed up everything or badly remembered!
        First Popular Journal of the USSR Ministry of Justice. Published since 1971.
        The second one. Article 93.1. Theft of state or public property on an especially large scale. Theft of state or public property in especially large amounts, regardless of the method of theft (Articles 89 - 93), especially large - amounting to more than 10 thousand rubles.
        Punished by imprisonment of 8 to 15 years with confiscation of property or the death penalty with confiscation of property.

        In your case, 200 thousand. According to approx. IT IS A 100% HIGH !!!
        1. your1970 2 June 2020 14: 32 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          1) it was necessary to give the output of the journal Man and the Law? I wrote about an article that I read in childhood and which my father swore
          2) And? Tower is admissible and what? Such theft could not be in the film industry of the USSR? Are you alluding to this? Or that I was wrong with the zeros?
          3) it's not in my case thieves filming this movie
          1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 14: 42 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: your1970
            1) it was necessary to give the output of the journal Man and the law?

            Do not. Everything if needed)
            Quote: your1970
            I wrote about an article that I read in childhood and which my father swore heavily

            Here I am about it, childhood memories! In our city in the late 70s, a man was taken off his hat, so the city grumbled about this month.
            Quote: your1970
            2) And? Tower is admissible and what?

            And then look if there are convicts or shot people in the film crew! belay
            Quote: your1970
            3) this is not in my case, but among thieves who shot this film

            I pay special attention that the “Eternal Call” - television serial film. In 1979, the main creators of the series were awarded the USSR State Prize. hi
            1. your1970 2 June 2020 15: 07 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Well, we’ll look .. I didn’t live to insanity yet and I remember perfectly what I read as a child ...
              My father wouldn’t grumble at the Cap for a Month; I paid attention to the article precisely because of his indignation at the extent of theft ....
              1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 15: 26 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: your1970
                Well, we’ll look .. I didn’t live to insanity yet and I remember perfectly what I read as a child ...
                My father wouldn’t grumble at the Cap for a Month; I paid attention to the article precisely because of his indignation at the extent of theft ....

                laughing My colleague, it’s just that in those days, the scope was different, but because there were a majority of decent people, for them the theft of 100 rubles seemed beyond understanding, hence the indignation. In five years I stole a three-ruble note, the girl treated my neighbor with ice-cream, so Daddy I learned to take someone else's wire as a wire from the iron for the rest of my life good drinks
                1. your1970 2 June 2020 15: 47 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Stroporez
                  it’s just that in those days, the “scope” was different, but due to the fact that the majority were decent,

                  Do you hear yourself ????
                  "All honest and decent" - and simultaneously the state introduces into the Criminal Code of the RSFSR shooting for theft in especially large ????
                  Articles in the Criminal Code appear only when there is an urgent need, when the existing measures - not enough !!!!!
                  And if this is not enough for you, then there is a row of articles 191.1 and 191.2 .... why would it quiet law abiding the country had to introduce responsibility for the attack on police officers and dnd ??? moreover, from 5 years ???
                  Hats for months discussed ... and the wire from the iron ... and silence in the country ...
                  1. Sling cutter 2 June 2020 18: 10 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: your1970
                    Do you hear yourself ????

                    Of course! yes The fact is that the article sounds in the original as theft of socialist, i.e. public property(it’s not clear?), and this amounted to undermining statehood.
                    The highest measure of social protection, execution, was applied to especially "distinguished" thieves and crooks!
                    Now the second moment, if you stole something for 100 rubles, then you were tried by the FRIENDLY court, public censure was made and ridiculed in satirical feuilletons, like "nesuna". Those. people were brought up, and did not try to break their lives with articles on trifles.
                    As for the police, I declare to you with full responsibility that the cops not only did not have batons, but they practically never carried a personnel card, hence the jokes about a cucumber in a holster. The policemen respected that they were afraid, but everyone knew that for the most part these are decent people who could come to the rescue if necessary.
                    Society was fundamentally different. Is it clear now?
                    PySy. As for the "wire from the iron", it was the only male educational process and I did not in any way less than respect and love my Father for it, but on the contrary I am grateful to him for everything.
                    1. your1970 2 June 2020 19: 13 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      Of course! Business
                      -no, you alas do not hear yourself ....
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      The fact is that the article sounds in the original as theft (!!!!!!!!!) socialist, i.e. public property (is it not clear?), and this was equivalent to undermining statehood.
                      The supreme measure of social protection - the shooting was applied to especially "distinguished" (!!!!!!!!) thieves and crooks!
                      -and from here it turns out that it turns out that:
                      a) stole
                      b) they stole and a lot (I had to introduce an article)
                      c) there was something to steal

                      Quote: your1970
                      "All honest and decent" - and at the same time the state introduces execution for embezzlement in especially large ones into the Criminal Code of the RSFSR ????
                      - I’m on the drum that they were shot, I support it — it was necessary to shoot, otherwise the USSR would have collapsed even earlier, would have been pulled away. Only after that SUDDENLY It turns out that far from everyone was discussing
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      the hat was removed, so the city grumbled about this month.
                      - enough were stolen in such volumes - that I had to introduce a firing squad !!!!

                      Quote: Stroporez
                      As for the police, I declare to you with full responsibility that the cops not only did not have batons, but they practically never carried personnel cards, hence the jokes about the cucumber in the holster.
                      - Kaneshn therefore and introduced an article with "for violence from 5 belay "...so it’s not so scary to carry a cucumber in a holster, huh ....

                      Repeat
                      Quote: your1970
                      Articles in the Criminal Code appear only when there is an urgent need, when the existing measures are not enough !!!!!


                      Quote: Stroporez
                      Society was fundamentally different. Is it clear now?

                      "The society was fundamentally different for one single reason - everything was the same for everyone: apartments, cameras, furniture, clothes, entertainment, life in the end. There was nothing to envy others - and this gave rise to confidence in the future (" we will earn- we’ll buy it, take tea ... "). And then envy appeared - Sharp tape recorders, Finnish toilets and refrigerators (Finnish Rosenlev, good KP), GDR walls, and so on, thingism went in one word. And that’s ruined our society rather any CIA and MI6
  4. knn54 2 June 2020 08: 49 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    As the parodist Alexander Ivanov once said in the "Union of Writers"
    There are about ten Krasnaya Polyana. Before the revolution there was only one. N. Tolstoy. And no one has ever heard of the classic works of contemporary countrymen.
    This can be added and modern vocal (not in the sense of voice) singers and much more.
  5. rocket757 2 June 2020 08: 54 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The topic is meaningless in the discussion! No consensus will come about.
    Boom to watch "White Sun in the Desert" and "Diamond Hand"!
    1. Terenin 2 June 2020 09: 07 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: rocket757
      The topic is meaningless in the discussion! No consensus will come about.
      Boom to watch "White Sun in the Desert" and "Diamond Hand"!

      Also, "They fought for their homeland" ...
      1. rocket757 2 June 2020 09: 17 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Terenin
        Quote: rocket757
        The topic is meaningless in the discussion! No consensus will come about.
        Boom to watch "White Sun in the Desert" and "Diamond Hand"!

        Also, "They fought for their homeland" ...

        The list is long, for every taste ... except for the perverse.
        Today I receive a parcel with books for the club "why" ... all the books of Soviet writers, because it is the right literature, necessary forever.
        1. Terenin 2 June 2020 09: 21 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: rocket757
          all books of Soviet writers, because it is the right literature, necessary forever

          Victor, and I grew up on these books. yes
          1. rocket757 2 June 2020 09: 32 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Gennady, I want to help children grow up as the right people, therefore I choose books very carefully. Of course, I consult with my parents ... so far there has not been a single misfire. Our people are normal ... just undereducated, and busy, as a rule.
            1. Terenin 2 June 2020 09: 39 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Quote: rocket757
              Gennady, I want to help children grow up as the right people, therefore I choose books very carefully. Of course, I consult with my parents ... so far there has not been a single misfire. Our people are normal ... just undereducated, and busy, as a rule.

              Victor, you study with small children in a small circle, and you are doing great good for a huge country. Good luck to you.
              1. rocket757 2 June 2020 09: 41 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                Thank. Boom to work while there is gunpowder in the bins!
                1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 10: 04 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Good luck ... and look with the kids, "Last Inch"
                  1. rocket757 2 June 2020 10: 12 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    We watched when the models of light aircraft did. Older guys already understand everything as it should.
    2. Free wind 2 June 2020 10: 50 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I can’t stand Mironov.
      1. rocket757 2 June 2020 10: 56 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This is not a problem ... everyone can have a celebrity gallery that is not hot to watch.
  6. SARANCHA1976 2 June 2020 08: 55 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    These requests are directly related to the market, which, as it turned out, we have chosen for ourselves as the main ideology. And for the consumer society - and films are most often appropriate. What an amazing story. I thought that culture shapes a person and society doesn’t. It's all your own fault. A magnificent excuse for mediocrity and thirst for profit.
    1. Lannan Shi 2 June 2020 09: 33 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Quote: SARANCHA1976
      . I thought that culture shapes a person and society doesn’t. It's all your own fault. A magnificent excuse for mediocrity and thirst for profit.

      Actually, yes, to blame. Here is an example of literature, for the movie is indifferent. There is such a site, litnet, specialization, mainly female novels. Not that my favorite genre, but sometimes, in the mood .... I can, yes. And the reader votes on the site in rubles. Directly, from the author, buying books, in the electronic version. So here. I read one such book. True free. Niasilila. For Mr. Hero is a vile animal, no animal variant. Mr. heroine is romantic and extremely dumb, um ... young lady of very easy virtue. And this is an extremely modest characteristic of the heroes. Invited and ennobled. I rarely criticize free books, for a freebie ... Don't like it? Do not read. But then it broke through. For the degree of abomination frankly rolls over. Wrote a comment. In style. Dear author, if your daughter or granddaughter is respected, they will perceive it as a guide to action. The author’s answer, literally - go to the prude, I give the readers what they need. Well, readers ... If there was a rating, like the one here ... For one comm, they would probably throw me a minus a million. So ... If the society is absolutely voluntary, and even paying money for it, it hawks such a substance ... Yes, even savoring with pleasure and hysterically squealing at those who hint at them with coprophagy ... Who is this evil cheburashka to us? Sami, all by yourself. And movies and other literature just make money on our requests. And the questions in general are to the moral of society, and not to those who satisfy the requests.
      1. Free wind 2 June 2020 11: 24 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And you madam think that before it was different.? I remember was snotty and inadvertently read a story about how damned Americans-plantators make young children work. A little boy nicknamed "Pen in ..", after drinking water, sat down in a canoe !!!!!! And he sailed to collect cocoa !!!!!!! Fearing leopards !!!!!! wassat I kind of knew geography, it was wild for me to read when adults write nonsense.
    2. Gardamir 2 June 2020 09: 34 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      There is not only market and consumption. Look how much dough is invested in advertising Valentine's Day. And let the films be unprofitable, but anti-Soviet.
  7. stalki 2 June 2020 09: 00 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I follow the news. Very few great quality films. Here from the last looked "main", anticipated, hoped. But in the end, I did not even finish half, spit. Mediocre work, crammed with some phrases, slogans, a couple of secondary actors play better than the "main". Money down the drain. Crammed into the plot unbeatable. A lot of emphasis on secondary information, there are completely ridiculous scenes that have nothing to do with biography.
  8. Russo Turisto 2 June 2020 09: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Blah blah blah blah, watch the video.
    And in your own words to talk about what there is not enough mind?
  9. apro 2 June 2020 09: 35 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    The law of the market ... what they order ... they take it off.
    It has long been switched to Soviet and old American cinema.
    Every year, Putin's Russia, Soviet actors play better ...
    1. Mikhail m 2 June 2020 11: 20 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Old French and Italian are good too.
  10. Gardamir 2 June 2020 09: 38 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    The venerable Soviet people from the beginning of the 90s could not remove anything.
    And as for criticism, if you shot about the 60s, so please and paint the wall, as it was then, and make the border the same. And sometimes for a long time you can’t understand what time the film was shot.
    1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 21: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Ptashuk ,, in August
      The44 "
  11. U-58 2 June 2020 09: 45 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    How does the market affect cinema?
    First of all, forgotten how to make full-length films.
    Authors cannot present their account in 90-120 minutes ...
    They would have series 6 or 8, and preferably 12. And three seasons of 12.
    This results in a “soapy” tyagomotin.
    There are, of course, good series. Spetsnaz, Liquidation, Adventures of Major Cherkasov are recognized and loved by everyone.
    Now about visualization.
    Right and left factual errors - soldier badges and orders of Glory in the form of officers. Again, the commanders of the Red Army until 1943 were called officers and were called what wasn’t in fact. They called the city of Molotov Perm (SMERSH), the city of Kalinin-Tver (Yesterday in Spider).
    The NKNB intelligence school is opened by decision of the General Staff (yesterday in the Intelligence) - nonsense and nonsense. The people in Shtrafbat fight year after year, although the maximum sentence is 3 months ..
    The background of the era, of course, is conveyed, but after all, the details are distorted, and this is postponed in the consciousness of the generation of the exam ...
    That is, the story is distorted.
    Again, according to Western tradition, movie heroes about our days are designers, lawyers, businessmen and sharks, businessmen who just do what they do to their colleagues. They have no time to work ...
    But the man of labor remained overboard, left with Soviet cinema ....
    And viewers watch how they make money, but don’t see how they make a living ...
    Yes, a lot of things can be written. The theme, being left to chance, is immense ..
  12. potap6509 2 June 2020 09: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    They took off budget money, limitedly watched it, because it would fail at the box office, they awarded themselves to loved ones at all kinds of Kinotavras, the red carpet, life was good. And nothing else is coming .... no one is watching, I’m an artist (artist), as I see it, further banned.
  13. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 09: 58 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And who is Klim Zhukov? ...
    1. Victorio 2 June 2020 12: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Skalendarka
      And who is Klim Zhukov? ...

      ===
      not indifferent, this is already a lot now
      1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 12: 39 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This is very good ... but globally? and why should I again increase the number of views for someone?
        Or again, people hawala "???
        1. Victorio 2 June 2020 12: 42 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Skalendarka
          This is very good ... but globally? and why do I again owe to someone - then increase the number of views?
          Or again, people hawala "???

          ===
          ) want me to summarize the content? see for yourself, with one look more or less
          1. Sklendarka 2 June 2020 12: 48 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            You know, to convey information through the film, this demonic occupation ...
            Interested in the outcome is not opinion, but the number of views.
            My opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the author of the article, but to this day it is.
            1. Victorio 2 June 2020 12: 51 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Skalendarka
              You know, to convey information through the film, this demonic occupation ...
              Interested in the outcome is not opinion, but the number of views.
              My opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the author of the article, but to this day it is.

              ===
              just the view rate is not at all that indicator. some fierce crap, and billions of views
  14. Van 16 2 June 2020 10: 11 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In short, the Union made films for the soul, and now for money.
  15. tatra 2 June 2020 12: 50 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    And as creative people squealed during the USSR, "the Communists forbid us and did not let us in, do not let us reveal all our talents," but how they got freedom from the Communists, as soon as they circumcised. Even those creative people who during the USSR did something good, talented, such as Ryazanov, for more than 30 years of their freedom from the Communists, starting with Perestroika, did not do anything better than they did under the rule of the Communists, and even worthy of their level of what they did under the Communists.
  16. nikvic46 3 June 2020 07: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In order to scold, you also need inspiration. He is not exhausted. In many films, they show the Soviet system in a very bad perspective. They do not even understand that the more they scold the past, the more attention is paid to the present. he needs to be compared. Everyone who kicks the past should know that in the future they will also be kicked. There is simply no other way.
  17. nikvic46 3 June 2020 15: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In one novel, the hero in years says I don’t want to be applauded for my authority. I want the audience to rate my work by the role "My wife complains that they say they are showing scumbags in the movies. I joked that they show them so that we they waged war with them. So it turns out, we are returned to the years of our brothers. We must arm ourselves to the teeth, which are no longer there.
  18. Krasnoyarsk 4 June 2020 19: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    = One of the reasons for this lies not so much in the nature of the directors and actors themselves, as in the requests of modern society. These requests are directly related to the market, which, as it turned out, we have chosen for ourselves as the main ideology. And for the consumer society - and films are most often appropriate. =
    Is this author’s stupidity or intentional insinuation?
    Yes, the whole public spits on these films, and the author is trying to convince us that these are “public requests”
  19. Old26 12 June 2020 18: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: your1970
    In the days of the USSR, too, there were a lot of the same crap movies about the war - as they are now. And nifiga censorship did not save ...
    It’s just that these crazy films were overlapped with real classics- “They Fought for the Motherland” (the greatest movie about the war in my opinion !!!) “, Only old people go into battle, Ballad about a soldier, Go and see, Check on the road ... .

    Putting your hand on your heart, now how many recall good films of the USSR about the war? Without the Internet? 15-20-30 pieces, no more ... and every year they shot at least a dozen about the war. And most of it passed and was instantly forgotten ....

    Here you can’t but agree. There were weak films in the USSR, but they were really covered with masterpieces. And Western films were chosen by him to match. It was not for nothing that among people there was an expression: “There are good, bad films and ... (then you can choose from Polish, Dovzhenko’s studios and other options). Now I’m writing and catch myself thinking that from films released on the screens of the country in 1970, I only remember “Liberation” and the EMNIP state film “Comedians” (about taunton macuts in Haiti). But there were probably good films. But human memory - a strange thing - has the property to forget. We remember the masterpieces. what is below this level - alas ...

    Quote: your1970
    “Katyusha” was rescued by a wounded landing party from the OMSBON, and a mountain of Germans was killed. There is a remake of the same content

    Even two remakes of ENMNIP

    Quote: U-58
    Right and left factual errors - soldier badges and orders of Glory in the form of officers.

    There are a lot of bloopers now. Maybe due to the fact that there were no military consultants. This morning my wife did the dressing, and I sat and watched a film, or rather some series of the film .. The EMNIP is called either “Devil Hunt” or “Devil Hunt”. I watched what is called half-eye. After a series of mistakes, he turned it off. On the SS object, the main characters move in a car with the number WH (Wehrmacht). One of the heroes has a TT pistol. Thank God that others have Parabellum and MP-38. Yes, all this is happening in Germany, as I understand it.
    So, in spite of cable TV, I prefer to watch discs of 10-15 year old exposure, both ours and foreign ones. I do not look garbage. Or if I ran into it, then a little bit to understand that this is garbage