The President appointed a new date for voting on constitutional amendments


The President of Russia supported the idea of ​​Ella Pamfilova to choose a date for voting on amendments to the Constitution. The head of the CEC proposed to choose the first day of July as such a date. It is noteworthy that July 1 is Wednesday. Earlier it was reported that voting can take place "in the middle of the week", and the voting day will be declared a day off.


It became known that before the approval of the voting date, Vladimir Putin held a small consultation with the Minister of Education.

The President asked if it would turn out that on July 1 two events intersect: the expression of the will of the Russians and the delivery of examinations by students in a particular subject? The head of state was explained that the USE will not be held on July 1 - other dates are scheduled.

The President noted that earlier there was a proposal to vote on the amendments on June 24 - the day of the Victory Parade. But the head of state said that there was no need to mix two completely different events.

It is necessary to remind that initially on April 22 was appointed as the date of voting. But well-known events have made adjustments.

It is also worth recalling the sensational statement of the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who in fact stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could already not have been asked, since "the legitimate authorities have already taken appropriate measures to amend the Basic Law." According to Pamfilova, the president wanted to hear “the opinion of the people not additionally provided for by the current Constitution”.

Photos used:
website of the President of the Russian Federation
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

267 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pereira 1 June 2020 17: 22 New
    • 20
    • 3
    +17
    If this is a day off, then the vote may coincide with a mass trip to the cottages.
    1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 17: 31 New
      • 58
      • 29
      +29
      A grand opinion poll for public money during the pandemic .....
      they could also interview by phone, the result is known.
      1. SRC P-15 1 June 2020 17: 35 New
        • 40
        • 19
        +21
        It is also worth recalling the sensational statement of the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who in fact stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could already not have been asked, since "the legitimate authorities have already taken appropriate measures to amend the Basic Law."

        Panfilov’s time to fly into space to be completely similar to Tereshkova! yes
        1. Lannan Shi 1 June 2020 17: 45 New
          • 45
          • 24
          +21
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Panfilov’s time to fly into space to be completely similar to Tereshkova

          Not. Well, in general, she’s right, if you think about it. Specific boys frayed, decided how it would be more convenient for them. Cho is there all sorts of blue-legged to ask that? All the same, it will be as decided, and not as the inhabitants want. And the young lady ... Just cuts the truth of the uterus. In some ways, her position even deserves respect. At least she is more honest than our guarantor.
          1. Tatyana 1 June 2020 19: 07 New
            • 13
            • 9
            +4
            The President appointed a new voting date for constitutional amendments from June 24 to July 1
            It is right.

            And then I was already surprised that it was earlier that the CEC of the Russian Federation decided to combine two events on June 24 - the Victory Parade and voting on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation ?!

            The people of June 24th - on the joys of the Victory Parade - are just drunk and will have fun! laughing
            1. Avanturist 2 June 2020 08: 45 New
              • 6
              • 6
              0
              Quote: Tatiana
              The people of June 24th - on the joys of the Victory Parade - are just drunk and will have fun!

              It is better not to desecrate such a holiday with this vote .. Everything should be deliberate and sober.!
          2. Motorist 1 June 2020 21: 52 New
            • 8
            • 9
            -1
            And you, comrade lieutenant colonel, kindle, or just commented? If you
            young lady
            , the first is condescendingly excusable. But just in case, put a minus.
            1. Hagen 2 June 2020 06: 38 New
              • 7
              • 7
              0
              Quote: Motorist
              And you, comrade lieutenant colonel, kindle

              But doesn't it seem strange to you that all the blasphemy and criticism of the events coincide with the essence and tonality of whining "because of a puddle"? Coincidence? laughing
        2. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 18 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: SRC P-15
          It is also worth recalling the sensational statement of the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who in fact stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could already not have been asked, since "the legitimate authorities have already taken appropriate measures to amend the Basic Law."

          Panfilov’s time to fly into space to be completely similar to Tereshkova! yes

          Unless only with computer graphics. )
        3. Nyrobsky 2 June 2020 00: 18 New
          • 5
          • 7
          -2
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Panfilov’s time to fly into space,

          Irrevocably, one way. yes
      2. opus 1 June 2020 17: 50 New
        • 41
        • 9
        +32
        Quote: Stroporez
        A grand opinion poll for public money during the pandemic .....
        they could also interview by phone, the result is known.


        Quote: author
        The President appointed a new date for voting on constitutional amendments


        There is a good Russian proverb-
        What about what, and lousy about the bath


        Full text of constitutional amendments: what are we voting for?



        The State Duma adopted in the second reading amendments to the Basic Law of our country. Initially, a package of amendments to the Constitution was introduced on January 20 by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Then, about 400 amendments were prepared for the second reading, including by deputies and senators.
        FOUR HUNDRED.... good

        Threat. deputies and ministers receive little, catastrophically little. If you would receive a salary with allowances of 5 rubles per month, then the amendment would be 000
        I propose to include the rules of the road in the Constitution
        1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 17: 58 New
          • 32
          • 13
          +19
          Quote: opus
          Then, about 400 amendments were prepared for the second reading, including by deputies and senators.
          FOUR HUNDRED..

          Greetings, Colleague! drinks And what do you give them four hundred, you give 800 !!!
          I would amend to keep it warm in summer and snow in winter. good
          1. opus 1 June 2020 18: 11 New
            • 17
            • 4
            +13
            Quote: Stroporez
            I would amend to keep it warm in summer and snow in winter.

            "Who will give will offer more? "
            1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 17 New
              • 17
              • 6
              +11
              For this reason, RI also fell ... Too many inadequacies appeared in the sweets ...
          2. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 13 New
            • 2
            • 6
            -4
            Comrade Stalin is clearly with you ............................................. .............))))))
          3. Alex Justice 2 June 2020 10: 41 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            To a fabulous person God should have added Solomon, Allah, Muhammad, I would be so on so that others would not be offended.
        2. Svarog 1 June 2020 18: 15 New
          • 28
          • 11
          +17
          Quote: opus
          Threat. deputies and ministers receive little, catastrophically little. If you would receive a salary with allowances of 5 rubles per month, then the amendment would be 000

          So you won’t do anything to stay at the trough .. in addition to the ZP, it turns out that way, if not more .. Almost all Edros are millionaires ..
          1. opus 1 June 2020 18: 26 New
            • 26
            • 3
            +23
            Quote: Svarog
            .. Almost all Edros millionaires ..

            Swim finely buddy.
            If the Moscow City Duma billionaires .... What about the State Duma to talk about.

            For the year, the income of the speaker of the Moscow City Duma Shaposhnikov increased 79 times
            The chairman of the Moscow Duma declared an income of almost 2 billion rubles. He explained such a significant increase in revenue by selling securities.


            did not believe at first ...
            but no

            INFORMATION ABOUT INCOME, PROPERTY AND LIABILITIES OF THE PROPERTY CHARACTER OF PERSONS REPLACING THE STATE POSITIONS OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW, AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2019
            1. aviator6768 3 June 2020 01: 58 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              To do what ? Well, few are ready (both morally and militarily), and the rest? To pamper?
              1. opus 3 June 2020 16: 18 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: aviator6768
                To do what ?

                There are only one legal ways:
                elections.
                Impeachment / recall neither of the deputy nor anyone else foreseen we realize essentially physically.
                In our "beautiful country", now, even despite the CONSTITUTION, a single picket is prohibited, in fact.

                even to the deputy
                bringing to administrative responsibility the participants of single pickets, united by a common goal, a common organization, geographically gravitating to each other, but carried out sequentially, and not simultaneously, within the framework of the current legislation of the Russian Federation, in particular under Art. 20.2 Administrative Code, impossible, and acts as a form of encroachment on the right to picket, guaranteed by Art. 31 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

                and on the decision of the Constitutional Court they spit
          2. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 39 New
            • 12
            • 7
            +5
            Quote: Svarog
            So you won’t do anything to stay at the trough .. in addition to the ZP, it turns out that way, if not more .. Almost all Edros are millionaires ..

          3. WIKI 1 June 2020 20: 38 New
            • 12
            • 1
            +11
            Quote: Svarog
            So you won’t do anything to stay at the trough ..

            400 corrections! Whatever improvements our bureaucrats can come up with, everything would have remained as before.
            1. Overlock 1 June 2020 22: 20 New
              • 8
              • 1
              +7
              Quote: WIKI
              Whatever improvements our bureaucrats can come up with, everything would have remained as before.

              They have the last fight ...
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Magog 1 June 2020 18: 37 New
          • 7
          • 6
          +1
          I propose to include the rules of the road in the Constitution
          No kidding: in the current Constitution there is no mention of traffic rules, although there has long been talk of "Duma" about the need to create a "Law on Road Traffic", and a corresponding link to it in the Constitution ... Instead, someone thought of giving the SDA editorial office to the GU department STSI - since then, the "madhouse with the Rules" does not stop.
          1. opus 1 June 2020 18: 50 New
            • 16
            • 7
            +9
            Quote: Magog
            "Law on Road Traffic", and the corresponding reference to it in the Constitution.

            those. I understand you correctly, you are on incl. SDA in the basic law ... even as a link?
            1. In the US Constitution not mentioned the word "democracy".
            In addition, the US Constitution is record short - it consists of 4,4 thousand words.
            2. The new Constitution of Ecuador (the twentieth in the history of the country) came into force on October 21, 2008. The Constitution includes 444 articles of the main text.
            belay
            quador became the first country in the world that secured the rights of nature at the level of the Constitution.
            3. I propose to add the following to the Constitution of the Russian Federation:
            -Earth, this is a planet, it is round, and the vortex of the Sun rotates.
            - Wash your hands after eating.
            -Americans did not fly to the moon and all the filming was done in Hollywood.
            -Ion Musk Quack
            - etc
            4. I like the constitution of Japan most of all. there are at least 103 articles, but just about 15 pages. everything is clear and understandable
            日本 國民 は ​​、 正義 と 秩序 を 基調 誠實 に る 國際 平和 を を 誠實 に 希求 し 、 國 、 武力 に よ る 又 紛爭 紛爭 を こ こ 放棄 こ 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 、 て 、 、るす る。
            前 項 の 目的 を 目 す る た め 、 陸海空 軍 そ の 他 の 戰 力 は 、 こ れ を 保持。 な い。 國 の 交戰 權 は 、 こ れ を 認 め な い。
            wassat
            5. The Constitution of Ukraine and the second Talmud can break the Bosko, doubting 9 doubt that someone has read it)

            ==========
            YurIst- people fooling Truth
            1. Magog 1 June 2020 19: 02 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Any citizen of the Russian Federation, going out onto the street / road is obliged to follow traffic rules! Where is it written? This is where the Constitution must be shown! Or isn’t it? Traffic regulations have the force of federal law - this is what should be called the "Law", not the "Rules". And to paint everything there, up to the regulation of the maintenance of roads and the responsibility of road services for violations of the Law.
              1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 19: 08 New
                • 20
                • 5
                +15
                Quote: Magog
                Any citizen of the Russian Federation, going out onto the street / road is obliged to follow traffic rules! Where is it written? This is where the Constitution must be shown! Or isn’t it? Traffic regulations have the force of federal law - this is what should be called the "Law", not the "Rules".

                Well, and even to prescribe "Smoking harms your health", the constitution will tolerate everything.
                1. opus 1 June 2020 23: 04 New
                  • 8
                  • 1
                  +7
                  Quote: Stroporez
                  Well, yes, and even prescribe "Smoking harms your health

                  we write everything. paper will endure
                  The elephant painter painted the landscape,
                  But before sending him to the opening day,
                  He invited friends to look at the canvas.
                  Connoisseurs have come. The elephant opened the picture.
                  “Well, then,” the crocodile began, “
                  The landscape is good! But I don’t see Nile ... "-
                  "That the Nile is not there is no great trouble! -
                  The seal said. “But where is the snow?” Where are the ice? "-
                  “Excuse me!” Said the mole. “
                  There is something more important than ice!
                  The artist forgot the garden. "-
                  “Oink-oink,” the pig grunted, “
                  The picture was a success, friends!
                  But from the point of view of us pigs,
                  There must be acorns on it. "
                  All wishes were accepted by the elephant.
                  Again he took up the paint
                  And to all friends as far as possible
                  with an elephant brush
                  Depicting snow and ice
                  And the Nile, and the oak, and the garden,
                  And even honey
                  (In case the bear suddenly
                  A picture will come)
              2. opus 1 June 2020 19: 15 New
                • 12
                • 1
                +11
                Quote: Magog
                Where is it written?

                and where is it written that you will sit or pay a fine for doing something wrong?
                CAO is a code or law, and Civil Code? And the EAEU TC, and a government decree?
                what?
                answer
                Legislation and other legal actsaccepted in the Russian Federation, ne must be contrary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation.


                Quote: Magog
                SDA have the force of federal law - and it should be called the "Law", not the "Rules"

                SDA is the "rulebook" adopted Decree of the Government Of the Russian Federation of 23.10.1993 N 1090 (as amended on 26.03.2020) "On the Rules of the Road" (together with the "Basic Provisions for the Admission of Vehicles to Operation and the Obligations of Safety Officers ... within their competence. Chapter 6. Constitution of the Russian Federation
                and the "law" is for example
                Federal Law of December 10.12.1995, 196 N 30.07.2019-FZ (as amended on July XNUMX, XNUMX) "On Road Safety"
                Quote: Magog
                And to paint everything there, up to the regulation of the maintenance of roads and the responsibility of road services for violations of the Law.

                it will then be the Great Soviet Encyclopedia in many volumes.
                And there will be no roads anyway
              3. fif21 1 June 2020 19: 40 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: Magog
                Traffic regulations have the force of federal law - this is what should be called the "Law", not the "Rules".

                For violation of the rules - administrative, for violation of the law - term recourse
              4. Mordvin 3 1 June 2020 21: 41 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: Magog
                Any citizen of the Russian Federation, going out onto the street / road is obliged to follow traffic rules! Where is it written? This is where the Constitution must be shown!

                Are you kidding me?
                1. Magog 2 June 2020 10: 16 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  It was rightly noted that traffic rules are valid throughout the Russian Federation in accordance with the Decree of the Government of Russia "dated 23.10.1993 N 1090 (as amended on 26.03.2020)", which leads to the practice of quarterly (literally!) Editing of traffic rules. The traffic police themselves have become stunned by such a pace of change. Such decisions on various occasions happen almost a dozen a year - go keep an eye on everyone! Here it is - MARTHING! Moreover, traffic rules from year to year do not get any better from this ... It is reasonable, in my opinion, to assemble a competent editorial group of independent experts and, finally, to make a balanced "Law on Road Traffic" - even if in a multivolume presentation, and publish it for mass information some excerpts - recommendations / traffic rules. The reference to the law should be in the text of the Constitution. Examples of such an approach to traffic rules can first be seen in the relevant laws of other countries.
                  1. Zefr 2 June 2020 18: 15 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    As far as I understand, the “fundamental law” is a strategic political memorandum that answers the question “How will we live?”. What do traffic rules have to do with the political system enshrined in the Constitution?
                    1. Magog 2 June 2020 19: 56 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      The Constitution defines the main activities of the state to ensure the rights of citizens. Including the right to “free movement” (Article 27). The order of this movement is governed by various traffic rules: on roads, rail, water and air. This requires a wording that combines the concepts of “free movement of citizens” and “obligation to comply with the state established procedure for movement,” that is, including traffic rules. In the Constitution, the Government’s listed obligations do not have the norm "edit the Rules of the Movement" (Article 114), which it is actively engaged in at present ... The government must implement decisions of the highest state. authorities in the framework of existing laws, rather than constantly changing the latter to suit their current tasks - this is about numerous decrees that have the force of laws ...
                      1. Zefr 2 June 2020 20: 14 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Well, that is, the government cannot determine the order of movement and constantly modifies it.
                        We introduce it into the constitution.
                        Now you can’t change anything.
                        And what made you think that this would be the best order? And why precisely this best order could not be written earlier in the laws? If you couldn’t do it before, why now - can they? Moreover, in such a way that nothing can be changed later?
                        And if these amendments are so important, what (...) so much empty advertising goes everywhere for these amendments? No necessary corrections in advertising are needed. So I'm sure they want to sell me something. I don’t need
                      2. Magog 2 June 2020 20: 25 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Introduce into the Constitution the wording in which every citizen is obliged in his activity to be governed by the laws of the state - SDA (Rules), introduced by a certain Resolution (as it turns out, not constitutional!) Cannot be considered a “law” even by their name ..., not to mention as this document. Therefore, there should be a "Law on DD". Now, I hope, the idea is clear? And the "legislative power", that is, the Duma, should change the laws. And changing through the Duma is not as simple and fast as it is now!
                      3. Zefr 2 June 2020 21: 11 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Pff ... Is this with us? It is enough to come up with a new word, for example, "self-isolation", and again there is no law. And the constitution will not help
                      4. Magog 2 June 2020 21: 21 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        “High availability period”, “self-isolation”, “electronic passes”, etc. will be indicated in the laws of the near future, if they "do not forget." In the meantime, it’s possible at the level of decrees and decrees ... By the way, about the “self-isolation” the corresponding initiative from SovFed has already been voiced. True, it can happen as with the “Law on DD”: they got aroused and quickly settled down ... But what, and so it all worked out the Way!
  2. Machito 1 June 2020 20: 38 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    Quote: opus
    Quote: Stroporez
    A grand opinion poll for public money during the pandemic .....
    they could also interview by phone, the result is known.


    Quote: author
    The President appointed a new date for voting on constitutional amendments


    There is a good Russian proverb-
    What about what, and lousy about the bath


    Full text of constitutional amendments: what are we voting for?



    The State Duma adopted in the second reading amendments to the Basic Law of our country. Initially, a package of amendments to the Constitution was introduced on January 20 by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Then, about 400 amendments were prepared for the second reading, including by deputies and senators.
    FOUR HUNDRED.... good

    Threat. deputies and ministers receive little, catastrophically little. If you would receive a salary with allowances of 5 rubles per month, then the amendment would be 000
    I propose to include the rules of the road in the Constitution

    Vote, do not vote, you still get .... zeroing.
    Joint work for my benefit, it unites. (C) Prostokvashino, cat Matroskin.
    For zeroing without clinking glasses drinks
    1. aviator6768 3 June 2020 02: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Where to go ? Who will lead? Do you believe in electoral changes?
    2. Whirlwind 3 June 2020 06: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      If there is no 90% of the vote FOR CHANGE of the Constitution, there will be no zeroing, but a complete discharge into the sump of the history of mankind, but the people will decide on July 1.
      The time has come to warn everyone ...
  3. Vadim237 1 June 2020 21: 06 New
    • 14
    • 19
    -5
    At least two amendments on the ban on having foreign citizenship and accounts abroad - respectively, real estate is also being urged to senators, deputies and judges to vote for
    1. Mordvin 3 1 June 2020 21: 43 New
      • 18
      • 2
      +16
      Quote: Vadim237
      and real estate also to senators deputies

      Senators and deputies rejected the amendment.
      1. Vadim237 2 June 2020 14: 18 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        If they do not have accounts and foreign citizenship, then real estate in any country will not be the same as real estate requires utilities, taxes on land and everything else and without citizenship you can’t acquire unless in the UAE.
      2. aviator6768 3 June 2020 02: 04 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, yes, he consulted - they are against! They are against! And you (we) - vote as you like ...
    2. opus 1 June 2020 21: 46 New
      • 19
      • 2
      +17
      Quote: Vadim237
      on the ban on having foreign citizenship and accounts abroad - respectively, real estate is also being urged by senators, deputies and judges to vote for

      only to judges and the president.
      and only limitations not a ban (not everywhere, but there is a word limitation)
      and about real estate no gugo
      EVERYTHING WILL BE FORMED FOR RELATIVES



      All this fuss is only for:

      and this is NOT "advertised" by 1,2 and other state channels, unlike "cats"

      read carefully
    3. Overlock 1 June 2020 22: 22 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: Vadim237
      two amendments on the ban on having foreign citizenship and accounts abroad - respectively, real estate is also being urged to senators, deputies and judges to vote for

      vote, that's just the law banning this has long been there. The trouble is that this law does not work. Your amendments will not work either.
      1. Vadim237 2 June 2020 14: 13 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        If they are officially spelled out in the constitution and supported by law, then it will be possible to poke it in the forehead, and the fact that they have real estate and accounts abroad is easier to find and prove every year.
    4. Revival 2 June 2020 04: 15 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      Are you lying or not in the know?
      Show Amendment to Ban Accounts and Property Abroad
    5. Revival 2 June 2020 04: 18 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Foreign citizenship is prohibited by the Fed Law since 2006.
      Lacks?
      Why an exaggerated amendment, the law already exists.
      Or is the law not enough?
      If so, then the amendment will not help.
      Exaggerated pretext in the end
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Whirlwind 3 June 2020 06: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Threat. deputies and ministers receive little, catastrophically little. If you would receive a salary with allowances of 5 rubles per month, then the amendment would be 000
    I propose to include the rules of the road in the Constitution

    And you show at least ONE amendment to the 1, 2 and 9 chapters of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    Even if you pay 400 million rubles. all the same, you won’t gain anything for a deputy salary.
    AND WHY ?
  • Motorist 1 June 2020 21: 36 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    I’ll go to vote if there is an opportunity. And you [all forum users]? Or just "in the kitchen"?
    1. Varyag_0711 2 June 2020 00: 21 New
      • 10
      • 9
      +1
      Motorist (Dormidond Evlampievich)
      I’ll go to vote if there is an opportunity. And you [all forum users]? Or just "in the kitchen"?
      In fact, your vote will not solve ANYTHING. And nobody will hear your NO. With your arrival at the station, you will only increase the turnout and, accordingly, the legitimacy of this Sabbath.
      I myself won’t go (although I go to all the elections for sure) and I will dissuade all of mine from participating in this SCAM.

      P.S. Putin finally fell in my eyes with this circus. I could just say I’ll stay at the galley until the end, in the sense until it drowns completely.
  • Avior 1 June 2020 17: 50 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    Therefore, the environment
    On Monday or Friday, it would definitely coincide.
    And on Wednesday, one day will go much less
  • Civil 1 June 2020 17: 50 New
    • 27
    • 11
    +16
    I nodded to the monitor, it counts, where to put a signature? They will take me to Rosneft, since I was the first to vote?
  • Svarog 1 June 2020 18: 11 New
    • 23
    • 14
    +9
    Quote: Pereira
    If this is a day off, then the vote may coincide with a mass trip to the cottages.

    So it is conceived. The vote is formal, I think no one doubts that the null will rule to the grave.
  • 210ox 1 June 2020 18: 44 New
    • 20
    • 4
    +16
    Well, vote and drive. Stop nodding on technology and deceit. If we come and vote about, no technology will help. This applies to any vote.
    1. Civil 1 June 2020 20: 19 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      Quote: 210ox
      Well, vote and drive. Stop nodding on technology and deceit. If we come and vote about, no technology will help. This applies to any vote.

      Late dear, your opinion is no longer interesting) everyone is already aware that 99%)
      1. 210ox 2 June 2020 06: 18 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        I respect my opinion. And I know that no one can steal my vote anymore. Well, if you think so, don’t go and don’t vote. Unfortunately there are tens of millions. Therefore, these villains go to us as they want.
  • krillon 1 June 2020 23: 01 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Judging by how widely they walk, the voting results are predetermined?
  • Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 24 New
    • 24
    • 17
    +7
    "It is also worth recalling the sensational statement of the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who actually stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could not have been asked, since" the legitimate authorities have already taken appropriate measures to amend the Basic Law. " According to Pamfilova, the president wanted to hear "the opinion of the people not additionally provided for by the current Constitution."

    The opinion of slaves is not interesting to anyone. )
    1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 17: 36 New
      • 8
      • 22
      -14
      You must understand that your opinion is asked because of politeness; if a decision has already been made at the top that there will be changes to the constitution, then they will be. In the case of weak activity of citizens, measures will be taken, as in the entire civilized world.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 47 New
            • 19
            • 15
            +4
            I am a Stalinist - by definition I can’t - shout “Heil”. I’ll rather strangle myself. And since I'm also a fan of Beria’s methods, I’ll rather strangle the rest)
            1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 17: 50 New
              • 11
              • 11
              0
              Quote: Misha Honest
              I am a Stalinist

              Koba was smart, and cruel and with a curious share of cynicism :) You believe in his image, but do not adhere to his views and ideas ....
              1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 55 New
                • 8
                • 10
                -2
                I do not believe in the image. I believe only in honor and honesty.
                By the way
                Quote: Voletsky
                cruel and with a curious share of cynicism :)

                just about me)
                1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 18: 00 New
                  • 7
                  • 8
                  -1
                  well xs xs :)

                  That's just, capitalism under Kobe was not structurally prohibited, and private business existed :)
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  just about me)

                  you specifically missed the part about the "smart"? :))))
                  1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 10 New
                    • 6
                    • 10
                    -4
                    Quote: Voletsky
                    You specifically missed the part about the "smart"?

                    I left it for fools - let them break the brain.)
                    1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 18: 12 New
                      • 5
                      • 12
                      -7
                      Okay :)) Sarcasm is a good thing, I have a shave from here, the blessed ones ran in, you could even discuss with you, and the humor is in place ...
                      1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 19 New
                        • 6
                        • 9
                        -3
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        Okay :)) Sarcasm is a good thing, I have a shave from here, the blessed ones ran in, you could even discuss with you, and the humor is in place ...

                        Sorry. ) Write - call if that ...)
              2. Krasnoyarsk 1 June 2020 18: 11 New
                • 6
                • 3
                +3
                Quote: Voletsky
                Koba was smart, and cruel and with a curious share of cynicism

                Tough or cruel?
                Look through the history, will you meet the soft-bodied leaders of successful states there? Under such soft-bodied leaders, the state either lost or disappeared from the political map of the world. What would you like more?
                1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 31 New
                  • 3
                  • 3
                  0
                  You're right. Just why are you afraid to write?
            2. tatra 1 June 2020 18: 07 New
              • 13
              • 4
              +9
              Those who, under Putin "are now better than in the USSR," are great masters shouting AGAINST, but they have big problems with FOR - if only it is financially beneficial for them, or beneficial in their anti-Soviet propaganda, how are they for the benefit of creating an anti-Soviet of the myth “how BEFORE the communists everything was wonderful,” they praise strictly one Russian monarch only because he was the last.
        2. Non liberoid Russian 1 June 2020 17: 51 New
          • 10
          • 26
          -16
          but in your opinion should we all zyuganov with Platoshkin zig?
          1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 59 New
            • 10
            • 6
            +4
            I don’t know about Platoshkin, but the guillotine is crying for sure)
          2. paul3390 1 June 2020 18: 05 New
            • 9
            • 3
            +6
            And where are these? Neither one nor the other - they are definitely not communists ...
            1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 11 New
              • 8
              • 11
              -3
              Platoshkin is a socialist. I am interested in it. )
              1. Vadim237 1 June 2020 21: 18 New
                • 7
                • 9
                -2
                “Platoshkin socialist” - Rather, a populist and balabol with 25 years of life abroad as a consul and the question of whether or not he was recruited during these 25 years of life there from any of the foreign intelligence services remains open. His activity after 2014 and he himself went well up the hill who gives him money for his campaign.
                1. Misha Honest 2 June 2020 00: 15 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  I don’t know about him - but I wonder, how do you know so well about Platoshkin? I have 3 options - either you are his ardent fan disappointed in failure. Or you are the next GDP bot stomping all possible competitors of the “commander in chief”. Or you are a fan of GDP. Which option is the most truthful?)
        3. gurzuf 1 June 2020 19: 13 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Do you think that having re-elected GDP, capitalism will leave the borders of the Russian Federation ??? no
      2. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 43 New
        • 12
        • 9
        +3
        Quote: Voletsky
        as in the whole civilized world.

        But in a “civilized world"? It seems to me personally that the world has gone mad and is heading straight to hell? And he doesn’t even need help.
        1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 17: 45 New
          • 7
          • 9
          -2
          Quote: Misha Honest
          But in a “civilized world"? It seems to me personally that the world has gone mad and is heading straight to hell? And he doesn’t even need help.

          this is called "Fatalism" my friend and from him gray hair appears, as well as depressive moods :) More humor, and positive thoughts ...
          1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 17: 52 New
            • 2
            • 5
            -3
            Alas, I’m not my friend yet. Alas ... Will you help me not slide to 37?)
            1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 17: 54 New
              • 4
              • 6
              -2
              Quote: Misha Honest
              Alas, I’m not my friend yet. Alas ... Will you help me not slide to 37?)

              I mean, I can’t sleep or what?! :)

              I am not a liberal and not a Stalinist :) I have my own views, but they do not concern this topic ... an ordinary meritocrat
              1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 02 New
                • 7
                • 4
                +3
                Quote: Voletsky
                ordinary meritrat

                That's always the case - you are looking for support ... And they tell you - a meritocrat or something worse ...)
                1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 18: 15 New
                  • 4
                  • 9
                  -5
                  Urine goats, build a fence smoother !!! :))))
                  1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 33 New
                    • 5
                    • 2
                    +3
                    Soak at least help?
                    1. Voltsky 1 June 2020 18: 36 New
                      • 3
                      • 8
                      -5
                      Where are the accompanying documents, where are the testimonies of the witnesses, whom did you bring comrade Beria? :))))
              2. unaha 1 June 2020 18: 40 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Your views are closer than ever to the possibility of implementation (from a technical point of view). If you imagine a rating system with storage on the blockchain, protected from fake inserts and fully accessible for viewing by all citizens. Including by whom, by whom, when, for which the rating was raised. )))
      3. dzvero 1 June 2020 18: 00 New
        • 3
        • 8
        -5
        There is only one measure - a threshold is set (20-25%) and if the turnout is lower, the result of the referendum is not taken into account.
      4. paul3390 1 June 2020 18: 03 New
        • 24
        • 8
        +16
        Your opinion is asked because of politeness
        I don’t think so. Usually, all the nasty things to people are made by the GDP without bothering with any politeness there. It's just that the upcoming coming of Vladimir Zero is so blatantly not legitimate that you have to hang up with such a rag .. For in the company of Kim, Mobut, Mugab, Duvalier and other lifelong presidents it’s somehow not at all convenient to communicate with the coveted West .. And in a country like they start to squint badly, because for 20 years of continuous promises, he is still a little numb. So you have to play democracy, then ..
      5. the most important 1 June 2020 18: 18 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Voletsky
        In the case of weak activity of citizens, measures will be taken, as in the entire civilized world.

        Will they beat ??
      6. krillon 1 June 2020 23: 05 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Like in Minneanapolis or Los Angeles?
    2. credo 1 June 2020 17: 38 New
      • 5
      • 9
      -4
      She just wanted to save government spending, but put it so clumsily that many thought the same thing as you. Do not judge her severely, just look at her appearance. Responsible work sucked out all the vital juices and forces to the sensitive attention to their words was gone.
      1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 07 New
        • 8
        • 7
        +1
        Tell me, are you taking this nonsense seriously? Or are you just kidding?)
        PS. Or are you just go-away?)
        1. credo 1 June 2020 18: 14 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Quote: Misha Honest
          Tell me, are you taking this nonsense seriously? Or are you just kidding?)
          PS. Or are you just go-away?)

          Do not judge by yourself, believe not all such ignoramuses as you.
          1. Misha Honest 1 June 2020 18: 35 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            So I judged by you ....
  • GRIGORIY76 1 June 2020 17: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And how will the voting be organized? I am registered in the Yaroslavl region, and on July 1 I will be in Arkhangelsk, can I vote?
    1. vadim dok 1 June 2020 17: 35 New
      • 21
      • 8
      +13
      "Vote" was allowed WITHOUT presenting a passport! Do not worry, everything is provided!
      1. BAI
        BAI 1 June 2020 17: 37 New
        • 12
        • 8
        +4
        can i vote?

        What for? They clearly said - everything has already been decided and framed.
        1. Carnifexx 1 June 2020 18: 34 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          What for? They clearly said - everything has already been decided and framed
          In order for the guarantor to know the opinion of the people, for some reason he is sure that the people will support these amendments
          1. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 44 New
            • 11
            • 9
            +2
            Quote: Carnifexx
            though for some reason he is sure that the people will support these amendments

            not sure about that. Voting for him is personal in nature - before leaving, he wants to be realized in the country's love for himself. He wants to hear what pleases him. But it turns out or not, it depends on everyone. As a matter of fact, the vote is not for kosntitutiya, but for Putin, “yes” or “no”
          2. Vadim237 1 June 2020 21: 20 New
            • 7
            • 7
            0
            Support do not worry.
            1. Overlock 1 June 2020 22: 25 New
              • 6
              • 5
              +1
              Quote: Vadim237
              Support do not worry.

              every nation deserves its ruler. So I did it to him
      2. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 17: 42 New
        • 18
        • 10
        +8
        Quote: vadim dok
        "Vote" was allowed WITHOUT presenting a passport! Do not worry, everything is provided!

      3. Crowe 1 June 2020 17: 46 New
        • 26
        • 7
        +19
        Quote: vadim dok
        "Vote" was allowed WITHOUT presenting a passport!

        Well, we’ve been talking about dictatorship, autocracy, the Middle Ages! What a freedom! Soon it will be possible to vote without polling stations, ballots and observers! He nodded to the jelly program on television - he fulfilled his civic duty! Democracy and freedom, where the rotten west is through .
    2. really 1 June 2020 17: 42 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Yes you are an optimist wink
  • credo 1 June 2020 17: 31 New
    • 20
    • 6
    +14
    In 56 seconds of speaking 4 or 5 times to repeat the word "legitimate" and its derivative is simply the height of tongue-tied language. But how many words in Russian have words that could compete and replace the tautology of the head of the CEC in her speech. For example, words or phrases - legally, reasonably, established by the Constitution, etc.
    Ella has earned, it is time for her to relax.
    1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 17: 36 New
      • 24
      • 12
      +12
      Quote: credo
      Ella has earned, it is time for her to relax.

      She has no time to rest, she also wants to become a “heroine of works”, which is worse than a vrotenberg or kinder.
    2. Voltsky 1 June 2020 17: 38 New
      • 16
      • 8
      +8
      Quote: credo
      In 56 seconds of speaking, repeat the word “legitimately” and its derivative 4 or 5 times

      and the guarantor likes this word, and lackeys picked it up; as at one time all hunting, and engaged in banbinton
    3. the most important 1 June 2020 18: 22 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: credo
      In 56 seconds of speaking 4 or 5 times to repeat the word "legitimate" and its derivative is simply the height of tongue-tied language. But how many words in Russian have words that could compete and replace the tautology of the head of the CEC in her speech. For example, words or phrases

      Equalize !!! Attention !! Fell - depressed !!!
    4. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 45 New
      • 12
      • 7
      +5
      Quote: credo
      In 56 seconds of speaking 4 or 5 times to repeat the word "legitimate" and its derivative is simply the height of tongue-tied language.

      I do not agree in "tongue-tied". This is an attempt to prove to people that his whim is legitimate.
  • Herman 4223 1 June 2020 17: 32 New
    • 17
    • 6
    +11
    Nus should go, express his opinion. Spit what Panfilov thinks.
    1. Avior 1 June 2020 17: 52 New
      • 4
      • 14
      -10
      Who needs this?
      1. Herman 4223 1 June 2020 17: 55 New
        • 11
        • 4
        +7
        I need you satisfied?
      2. Sergej1972 1 June 2020 19: 19 New
        • 9
        • 22
        -13
        I'll go and vote for. Social articles and animal rights on my drum. The attitude is neutral. Some changes in the relationship between the branches of government are to my liking, although they seem insufficient. I support the prohibition of dual citizenship of officials and the ban on foreign accounts. Plus, I support the mention of the state-forming role of the Russian people and the special role of the Russian language. Although I think the wording is somewhat half-hearted. I support the provision on the protection of the integrity of the territory. The so-called zeroing is a neutral attitude. Most likely, Putin will not be nominated in 2024. Will be - I see nothing terrible. In any case, due to age, he will be forced to seriously share power with the Government and the State Duma.
        1. Mordvin 3 1 June 2020 22: 33 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: Sergej1972
          I support the mention of the state-forming role of the Russian people and the special role of the Russian language

          And what does it mean? Guest workers forced to take exams? Those who work on a hairdryer will be fined? Will McDonald’s signs be written in Cyrillic?
        2. krillon 1 June 2020 23: 22 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          Behind all the husk, in fact, only one question is important: is it possible to continue to rule. With our presence on the sites, we must ensure the legitimacy of this proposal. Everything else for seed. It is possible to support references and a special role as much as you like, but as far as I understand the country is federal, it is called the Russian Federation, and what kind of place do you propose to give the republics. Enforce your judgment as you plan? Power must be removable. Dot. I taxied it myself, give it to another.
          1. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 40 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Krillon
            Power must be interchangeable

            Tell it to Lukashenko.
            1. krillon 3 June 2020 23: 11 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Let the Belarusians tell him.
        3. Fikys 2 June 2020 02: 35 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: Sergej1972
          I'll go and vote for

          Similarly. And for about the same reasons. I frankly do not understand many locals who advocate the sovereignty of Russia in words, but in fact sabotage it.
        4. Revival 2 June 2020 04: 31 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Always in the population there is a part of about 25/30% that supports the current government, it doesn’t matter who, but only because it is “power”, even a jellyfish. A sort of natural "gene" of deviation ..
          1. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            "gene" of adherence.

            Show your genetics diploma and your scientific article about the genes of the Russian people and about the gene of worship in more detail, well, do not forget to tell about the genes of your people.
      3. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 49 New
        • 16
        • 8
        +8
        Quote: Avior
        Who needs this?

        The boycott has never won anywhere. Here you are, out of touch, did not go, but the consonant - went. Your voice has been attributed to him. Have you won? That is how he won. Opponents did not come, and their votes “voted”.
        1. Avior 1 June 2020 20: 32 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          But where did you get the idea of ​​what kind of boycott I am?
          The man wrote so that I wanted to know what result he personally expects from this?
          He expects improvement for himself as a result, or he, for example, considers it necessary to maintain power, or simply speak out, albeit anonymously, even if this does not change anything, or something else — I wanted to understand.
          Perhaps I did not very successfully formulate the question, but a sharp reaction to it repelled any desire to clarify the wording.
          And what you wrote, I am in the know.
          hi
          1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 20: 51 New
            • 9
            • 4
            +5
            Quote: Avior
            But where did you get the idea of ​​what kind of boycott I am?

            Camrad hi , there are only two options, either to go or not, only this will not change the result. Wang, that Elochka will draw 70 appearances and 70 "for". The turnout is the legitimization of the “circus”, but on the other hand, a clear “against” is turned into a “for” can lead to discontent.
            Here is such a layout. hi
        2. Machito 1 June 2020 20: 57 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          Quote: Silvestr
          Quote: Avior
          Who needs this?

          The boycott has never won anywhere. Here you are, out of touch, did not go, but the consonant - went. Your voice has been attributed to him. Have you won? That is how he won. Opponents did not come, and their votes “voted”.

          Election commissions falsify final voting protocols. I worked as a member of the election commission and saw the results of the forgeries of our esteemed teachers. After the closure of the precinct commissions, the protocols are forged and the fakes are taken to the TECs. These are our honest teachers. First, they deceive parents at polling stations, drag school principals to local deputies, and then extort bribes from their parents for the education of their children. What can they teach children? To lie, deceive, impersonate, steal, take bribes.
          But in the end? And in the end, 146% of voters will vote for zeroing the already reset zero.
          Why is the USSR so bent so easily? Because everyone is tired of the lies of the authorities. Now what? One lies from all levels of government. The only truth. There is no money, but you hold on. We did not ask you to give birth. Macaros are always cheap, etc.
          1. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Lay out a photo, video about how teachers are the main corrupt officials in the country, if you witnessed so many crimes, then how an honest citizen should write a statement to the police, but since you are a troll, you have collected all the nasty things about our country and posted, and you have no evidence.
        3. Motorist 1 June 2020 22: 28 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Here you are, who are not willing, did not go, but the consonant went

          Sylvester, do you go to a controlled vote? Or are you just pouring bile here?
          1. Revival 2 June 2020 14: 31 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Take a break from your Ukraine, something else is discussed here
        4. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Go gentlemen to work in the election commissions and see for yourself how the voting goes and then you won’t have to come up with stories about the elections and collect garbage on the Internet. In ancient Rome, those who had the right to vote were called Citizens. They fought for the right to vote 100 years ago, and nowadays there are those who voluntarily refuse this right - these are slaves who do not bear responsibility for anything and do not have their own opinions.
    2. Carnifexx 1 June 2020 18: 33 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Oh yes, since the guarantor wants to know the opinion of the people on the amendments, then he needs to express this opinion
  • Karaul73 1 June 2020 17: 32 New
    • 15
    • 7
    +8
    Quote: Misha Honest
    "It is also worth recalling the sensational statement of the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who actually stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could not have been asked, since" the legitimate authorities have already taken appropriate measures to amend the Basic Law. " According to Pamfilova, the president wanted to hear "the opinion of the people not additionally provided for by the current Constitution."

    The opinion of slaves is not interesting to anyone. )

    Ah aunt well done !!! Pravdorub from the ruling elite. No one says this out loud, but she is here for you.
  • kenig1 1 June 2020 17: 36 New
    • 12
    • 5
    +7
    Yes, in the former President of the Council of the President of the Russian Federation for the Promotion of the Development of Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights, she laid down this way.
    1. Carnifexx 1 June 2020 18: 30 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Would be prettier and younger I would even get horny, but generally sad
      1. Gardamir 1 June 2020 19: 01 New
        • 17
        • 5
        +12
        i would even get horny
        get excited

  • Break through 1 June 2020 17: 36 New
    • 12
    • 17
    -5
    Fine good Vote!
  • Mountain shooter 1 June 2020 17: 37 New
    • 10
    • 14
    -4
    Day off, day off ... it's good! laughing
  • Prahlad 1 June 2020 17: 46 New
    • 10
    • 11
    -1
    All will be deleted (via the Internet) and everything is covered indoor
    1. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 51 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      Quote: Prahlad
      All will be deleted (via the Internet)

      according to recent polls, people for some reason do not go online voting request
      They want to come for a piece of paper and cross out something request
    2. krillon 1 June 2020 23: 42 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Who cares can find the statements of the developer of the system "GAS-election" Yuri Lomov about his offspring. The CEC is the office of the President’s Administrative Department which stands at his contentment. So the roles have long been distributed.
  • alex aircraft 1 June 2020 17: 50 New
    • 21
    • 9
    +12
    We must stop rocking the staples and drowning the galley !!!! all as one we go and vote !! or do you want like dill ?? let's say there is no pandemic and amendments yeah !!!!! all to vote both direct and remote.
    1. Interlocutor 1 June 2020 18: 02 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      We must stop rocking the staples and drowning the galley !!!! all as one we go and vote !! or do you want like dill ?? let's say there is no pandemic and amendments yeah !!!!! all to vote both direct and remote.


      Offset laughing
    2. Fungus 1 June 2020 18: 17 New
      • 7
      • 11
      -4
      Does it burn? It's good smile
    3. kenig1 1 June 2020 18: 19 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Enchanting sarcasm, plus!
  • for
    for 1 June 2020 17: 51 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    "Criticize, offer."
    I suggest that you consider the receipt of salaries, benefits, subsidies, etc. to be considered consent for the changes.
  • yfast 1 June 2020 17: 56 New
    • 16
    • 10
    +6
    The guarantor was impatient, just like a toilet. Could three months and wait for decency.
    1. depressant 1 June 2020 21: 54 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      Colleague, Putin cannot wait. Serious changes are being prepared. I have no doubt that at the direction of Putin, hastily, on New Year's Day, an unprecedented Order of the Government of the Russian Federation was adopted under number 3260-r on privatization of all federal property over the next two years. Including deposits of oil, gas, land, other things - all that is still state. Separately preparing land reform. Obviously, between the oligarchs graters for sweet pieces of state property are possible. Privatization of land based on vouchers distributed in the 90s is unlikely to go smoothly. And this is very short about what lies ahead. Namely, the complete and final transition from socialism to capitalism in conditions when a still significant part of the population, including even young people, thinks in socialist categories. It is unlikely that such a transition with the sharing of balances of previously common property will take place painlessly for the country. Consequently, we are entering a period of domestic political instability, which is dangerous given the ill-wishers behind the cordon, aimed at aggression against our country, and the global political and economic crisis, which will undoubtedly be protracted. Voting by amendment is the way Putin has chosen to find out which political forces he can rely on. In particular, on occasion - on the people. Apparently, Putin will have to withstand serious pressure from big capital, which is able to buy up any protest moods and thereby seriously destabilize the country. At least capital thinks so. From this it turns out that Putin needs to find out whether the population is his support or has stepped aside. But for me it is important whether Putin will take into account my interests in this whole story.
      1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 22: 24 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        Quote: depressant
        Putin will have to withstand serious pressure from big capital, which is able to buy up any protest moods and thereby seriously destabilize the country. At least capital thinks so.

        Greetings! hi Have you tried to count the money of friends of a friend, at least "white"?
        Quote: depressant
        about it is important for me whether Putin will take my interests into account throughout this story.

        Of course not!
      2. Overlock 1 June 2020 22: 28 New
        • 7
        • 4
        +3
        Quote: depressant
        Putin needs to find out whether the population is his support or has stepped aside.

        in doubt ... after the pension reform?
        Quote: depressant
        But for me it is important whether Putin will take into account my interests in this whole story.

        already taken into account, increased taxes, retirement age and more .. on the little things
        1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 07: 29 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          The retirement age was raised according to the instructions of the IMF; this is the priority of international law over Russian law.
          In the amendments, they will just cancel it.
          1. Vladivostok1969 2 June 2020 09: 44 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            How can the IMF affect retirement age? Perhaps if Russia would lend in it, then probably it (the IMF) could put forward various conditions. But as our authorities reported, the external debt of the Russian Federation has been steadily declining until recently. The Russian government has been interested in raising the retirement age.
            1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 18: 43 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Very simply, there is article 15 in the constitution where in paragraph 4
              sczano:
              4. The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes other rules than those provided for by law, the rules of the international treaty are applied.
              There is a decision of the Supreme Court where it is said that the meaning and content of universally recognized norms is disclosed to international UN agencies. The IMF is an international institution, so their decisions are part of our legal system.
      3. krillon 1 June 2020 23: 57 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Dreamer, you called me! King makes the retinue! Not the people, pah, the population. His opinion is considered last but not least. The security forces are controlled, the governors, that is, the President’s aides on the ground, the governor’s corps is loyal, they don’t take others there, and why take our interests into account?
      4. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        You can meet the already famous
        Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 3260-r on privatization of all federal property over the next two years
        ?
        1. depressant 3 June 2020 13: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          A colleague simply type in the search engine an Order, etc., the search engine will give it to you.
  • Pvi1206 1 June 2020 17: 57 New
    • 16
    • 6
    +10
    Citizen, remember!
    The duration of the second wave of coronavirus will depend on the results of voting on amendments to the Constitution!
    1. Herman 4223 1 June 2020 18: 38 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      A good recipe for baranovirus.
  • ultra 1 June 2020 17: 58 New
    • 13
    • 15
    -2
    I will agitate friends and acquaintances to go to vote, naturally against amendments.
    1. tatra 1 June 2020 18: 17 New
      • 11
      • 16
      -5
      And I'm not going to participate in this farce at all.
      1. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 52 New
        • 12
        • 11
        +1
        Quote: tatra
        And I'm not going to participate in this farce at all.

        in vain!
        1. tatra 1 June 2020 20: 29 New
          • 10
          • 9
          +1
          All amendments have already been adopted, and the authorities need only show that the people in droves have come to support them. So I will not be in this crowd of yours for the joy of power.
    2. Carnifexx 1 June 2020 18: 26 New
      • 13
      • 12
      +1
      I agree, good luck. But to ignore this is the most stupid, because there will be no minimum threshold, and state employees and some others will be driven to vote "correctly"
    3. purple 1 June 2020 18: 40 New
      • 14
      • 16
      -2
      Quote: ultra
      I will agitate friends and acquaintances to go to vote, naturally against amendments.

      and what amendments do not suit? Have you ever read them?
    4. Herman 4223 1 June 2020 18: 40 New
      • 12
      • 14
      -2
      So you are for ?! dual citizenship of officials, and the priority of international law over Russian.
    5. stylet 3 June 2020 12: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Co-workers, then there are only friends and acquaintances, well, well
  • mortido 1 June 2020 18: 09 New
    • 15
    • 8
    +7
    Why this ostentatious vote without a choice, in which a more or less fresh vinaigrette is served from variegated amendments, and as the main dish it is a rotten nullification from which is smashed by cheating and for which this miserable farce was directed
    1. Herman 4223 1 June 2020 18: 44 New
      • 8
      • 7
      +1
      Maybe so that there would be no more of this.
      https://youtu.be/6Vv7KeEpyz8
  • Svarog 1 June 2020 18: 13 New
    • 17
    • 15
    +2
    It is also worth recalling the sensational statement by the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who in fact stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could no longer be asked

    And when did people ask for an opinion? Especially if it does not coincide with those in power .. Pension reform has been messed up, but here it’s generally easier than that ..
    1. Terenin 1 June 2020 21: 03 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Svarog
      It is also worth recalling the sensational statement by the head of the CEC, Ms. Pamfilova, who in fact stated that the opinions of the people on the amendments could no longer be asked

      . The pension reform was messed up, but here it’s generally easier than that ..

      In my opinion, pension reform is definitely a mistake.
      1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 07: 40 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        This is not a mistake, this is a direct indication of the IMF. This is the priority of international law over Russian, why do you think when Putin started talking about amendments, he began talking about sovereignty as the first item and that we won’t be able to exist without it.
        1. Terenin 2 June 2020 09: 05 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Herman 4223
          This is not a mistake, this is a direct indication of the IMF. This is the priority of international law over Russian, why do you think when Putin started talking about amendments, he began talking about sovereignty as the first item and that we won’t be able to exist without it.

          Of course. You can not solve the problems of inner life under the influence of others.
          hi
  • Carnifexx 1 June 2020 18: 24 New
    • 6
    • 7
    -1
    Voting in order to legitimize the amendments, because the State Duma consists of Edra, and Putin himself understands that Edro is a bastard (he walked as a nominee himself), and with the help of such speeches to increase the rating of the most nullified
  • parusnik 1 June 2020 18: 24 New
    • 15
    • 9
    +6
    Hmm .... We are all looking forward to this day, with impatience .... When we vote for zeroing the deadlines ...
  • credo 1 June 2020 18: 35 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: the most important
    Quote: credo
    In 56 seconds of speaking 4 or 5 times to repeat the word "legitimate" and its derivative is simply the height of tongue-tied language. But how many words in Russian have words that could compete and replace the tautology of the head of the CEC in her speech. For example, words or phrases

    Equalize !!! Attention !! Fell - depressed !!!

    The same is not bad, only in the first word a soft sign is forgotten.
  • purple 1 June 2020 18: 36 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Misha Honest
    Unless only with computer graphics. )

    and where does the graphics?
  • The Siberian barber 1 June 2020 18: 38 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    Like "vote" for / against that / that / who has already been decided!))
    And I kept thinking about the new term: "new normality"))
    Here it is, Mikhalych! ©
    1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 07: 44 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      The decision of the people is superior to the decision of the authorities.
      So you were offered to deny officials the right to dual citizenship, if you say no, then this right will be legalized for them.
      1. 2 Level Advisor 2 June 2020 09: 43 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        The law on the ban has already existed since 2006 .. From the fact that it will be written once again, what will change?
        1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 17: 59 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, but the Federal Law is one thing, and the constitution is another. In addition, the Federal Law contains one clause on this subject, "unless otherwise provided by an international treaty."
          There are loopholes and they will be covered.
          1. 2 Level Advisor 2 June 2020 21: 55 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Well, if you think it’s normal that the Federal Law doesn’t work, but as soon as they write it into the Constitution, everything will work .. then the logic of your answer is incomprehensible to me, since I don’t see any reasons for earning from duplication ..
            1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 22: 31 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I also don’t understand your logic, or rather, “frosty ears to my mother’s frost”, these amendments have a lot of useful and there’s nothing wrong with that.
              What is wrong with the priority of national law over international?
              Or legal succession from the USSR?
              The law prescribed in the constitution has a higher effect. And in the Federal Law there are loopholes on the topic of an international treaty, that is, if dual citizenship is allowed by an international treaty, then it is also allowed for an official. This law is like a drawbar and it’s impossible, but if you want ..
              Of course, not all laws are executed this is true, but it is better when it is. Lawlessness is worse.
              1. 2 Level Advisor 2 June 2020 22: 41 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                You see, the Federal Law is binding on all citizens in the Russian Federation .. MANDATORY! And if you add a norm to the Constitution, it can no longer become mandatory, since it must be unambiguously and so implemented .. accordingly, I don’t understand why it will work when introduced into the Constitution, if it doesn’t work now .. And the rest that you list is also already exist in the Federal Law different and for a long time .. Duplication there is a solid Federal Law or something that is clear, such as words about God .. But the real new thing is the State Council and zeroing ..
                1. Malyuta 2 June 2020 22: 54 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Quote: 2 level advisor
                  You see

                  Comrade, noooooo, they don’t understand, that's why they screw them up about the Pechersk-Polovtsy, 330 Spartans with a scilla and a charybdis, you can also talk about white-gray runaways, crochet, the bunker said, the scrapostan reported.
                2. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 23: 07 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  The State Council is not new; it has been working since 2002 if I am not mistaken.
                  This is an advisory body, has no power.
                  And there is no nullification in the amendments; this is a separate law and has already been adopted.
  • purple 1 June 2020 18: 39 New
    • 9
    • 10
    -1
    Quote: parusnik
    Hmm .... We are all looking forward to this day, with impatience .... When we vote for zeroing the deadlines ...

    I vote not for zeroing, but for the rest of the amendments ...
    But if you didn’t read, but only somewhere you heard ... this is not a civic position
    1. parusnik 1 June 2020 18: 54 New
      • 12
      • 5
      +7
      Only 206 amendments to the Constitution ... This is how much the Federal Law needs to be changed and the new Federal Law is adopted in connection with the amendments ... Well this is how much work for our deputies over the next decade and a half ... It turns out, on the 30th year of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, we understood how is it not perfect? ​​And did you understand then when all the terms of the president have expired? .. But isn’t it easier not to engage in foolishness and adopt a new Constitution, without zeroing ... Ah, yes there will be more work ... The Federal Law should be brought into line with the Constitution. ..
      1. Herman 4223 1 June 2020 20: 00 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        Imperfect, to put it mildly, the basics were written by USIAD, in the USA.
        1. Sergej1972 2 June 2020 13: 39 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          The text itself is well written. Alekseev and Mishin were smart people and high-class lawyers. Much has been taken from the French Constitution, but described much more verbose. If we take the sections on federal relations, then undoubtedly the influence of the Constitutions of the United States, Germany and even India. But in general, the scheme of separation of powers, as well as the form of government, are completely different from all of these countries. Federalism is not cooperative, German-Austrian, or non-American. But even the supercentralized federalism of the Indo-Pakistani-Venezuelan model is not quite similar.
          1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 20: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I don’t know about how smart Alekseev and Mishin were. But the first chapter of the foundations of the constitutional system, all other chapters cannot contradict it, was written by USAID, and this is indicated on their official website. I read.
    2. Sergej1972 1 June 2020 19: 24 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      I have the same position.
    3. New Year day 1 June 2020 19: 59 New
      • 17
      • 10
      +7
      Quote: purple
      and for the rest of the amendments ...

      and what is special about them? Everything is already enshrined in the old constitution and federal laws. It remains to fulfill them. And the elite didn’t give a damn about it anyway. They chose their homeland THERE! And earn HERE!

      That Navka bought an apartment in New York and all. A federal law May 7, 2013 Mr. N 79-FZ forbids this to her and Peskov must be dismissed from the civil service. But they have not written the law and they do not need amendments. Amendments - for suckers
      1. yfast 1 June 2020 22: 45 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        So can the power to re-elect better than to tweak the constitution? And then again, the Cheka, Dzerzhinsky, pitchfork, surplus appraisal, gallows at the cottages, as in 1917 and hello again.
  • purple 1 June 2020 18: 44 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Quote: kenig1
    Yes, in the former President of the Council of the President of the Russian Federation for the Promotion of the Development of Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights, she laid down this way.

    Well, will the proofs be? Or do you justify making a man a habit?
  • Bshkaus 1 June 2020 18: 50 New
    • 11
    • 5
    +6
    I have a question for members of the forum, and someone will really vote? For me, voting by e-mail, or almost without presenting passports, as Vesti FM spoke about this today, is not just a bust, it’s a mess.
    1. parusnik 1 June 2020 22: 02 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      this is a uniform mess.
      ... Here, here ... the point is to go ..
    2. Motorist 1 June 2020 22: 53 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      someone will really vote?

      I’ll go, I wrote above. I think that it is better to vote on the site than to indulge in the forum. Thanks for the correct question.
      1. Mordvin 3 1 June 2020 23: 56 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Quote: Motorist
        I’ll go, I wrote above. I think that it’s better to vote on the site than balabolit on the forum

        I won’t go, because our opinion does not mean anything. Everything has already been decided, but a vote with a result of 70% for is needed only so that the president can then wave this piece of paper with the results.
    3. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Listen more
      Quote: Bshkaus
      News FM
      there they will not say that.
  • purple 1 June 2020 18: 56 New
    • 9
    • 17
    -8
    Quote: parusnik
    Only 206 amendments to the Constitution ... This is how much the Federal Law needs to be changed and the new Federal Law is adopted in connection with the amendments ... Well this is how much work for our deputies over the next decade and a half ... It turns out, on the 30th year of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, we understood how is it not perfect? ​​And did you understand then when all the terms of the president have expired? .. But isn’t it easier not to engage in foolishness and adopt a new Constitution, without zeroing ... Ah, yes there will be more work ... The Federal Law should be brought into line with the Constitution. ..

    those. in your opinion let it be as it is?
    Changes to the constitution are needed, and do not care about these nullifications. Zeroing is worth these amendments
    1. New Year day 1 June 2020 20: 01 New
      • 13
      • 11
      +2
      Quote: purple
      do not care about these zeroing. Zeroing is worth these amendments

      offer Putin for eternity? Until the last Russian? Take an interest in how over the past 2 years, mortality paces the country
      1. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 02 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Please provide mortality statistics! Do not confuse us with Ukraine!
    2. parusnik 1 June 2020 21: 37 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      those. in your opinion let it be as it is?
      ... And from what did you draw such a conclusion? It’s written to me .. "But it’s not easier not to engage in foolishness and to adopt a new Constitution, without zeroing ..." In their last years, boards with comrades are developing a new Constitution, taking into account all the amendments, but for the remaining time it may come to mind. ..Take, the whole composition leaves with the president and new elections on the basis of the new Constitution .. Zeroing, so zeroing .. Let everyone be nullified and the president and his comrades and the Duma ...
  • purple 1 June 2020 19: 06 New
    • 10
    • 11
    -1
    Quote: Misha Honest
    The opinion of slaves is not interesting to anyone. )

    so you better keep quiet laughing
    1. gurzuf 1 June 2020 19: 29 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      good and it is right!
  • Sklendarka 1 June 2020 19: 07 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Now heal ...
  • Gennady Korsunov 1 June 2020 19: 09 New
    • 11
    • 12
    -1
    This one would go zero !! And as far as possible from Russia !! After all the nasty things that he did for the people who will vote for him ..
    1. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Therefore, praise your Zelensky and vote for his 2 term! And then he did not have time for the first!
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. tatra 1 June 2020 19: 46 New
      • 12
      • 6
      +6
      For some reason, Putin and those who are for him haven’t been disturbed by the “Constitution written by the Americans” for 20 years, but now it’s worth it. And what's the point of voting for or against what is already accepted by the authorities? To power on TV crucified about the "popular support of the decisions of the party and government"? Both the government itself and all normal people in Russia understand that apart from Putin’s lifetime rule, nothing will change due to these amendments.
      1. tagil 1 June 2020 19: 54 New
        • 7
        • 5
        +2
        And what's the point of voting for or against what is already accepted by the authorities?
        So what's the problem, then shout like a fire. The authorities put a big bolt on you, so you put no less on them.
        Both the government itself and all normal people in Russia understand that apart from Putin’s lifetime rule, nothing will change due to these amendments.
        I will remind you of this statement when your words do not come true. But for some reason I’m sure that you will also find a justification for Putin’s departure in a favorable light. Yes, and who gave you the right to speak on behalf of all normal people and on behalf of the whole people ???
        1. tatra 1 June 2020 20: 26 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          You did not refute my words in any way, you only got angry. The enemies of the Communists with these "amendments" are zombifying the Russian people according to the same pattern by which they zombified the Ukrainian people with the Association Agreement with the EU.
          1. tagil 1 June 2020 21: 00 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            The “Honest Communists and Komsomol” ended in 1991, when they rushed for nothing to buy up and simply appropriate national enterprises, land, mineral resources and all the other wealth of the Soviet Union. So do not speak for people who themselves, with their own hands and in their own interests, have ruined their country. They destroyed it so that these people would be hunched over at the factories and factories taken from them, earning for the former communists the same yachts and castles that you blame the authorities, and their children just study and live abroad.
            The enemies of the Communists with these "amendments" are zombifying the Russian people according to the same pattern by which they zombified the Ukrainian people with the Association Agreement with the EU.
            Everything else without comment, this is nonsense.
            1. tatra 1 June 2020 21: 06 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              And now return from the anti-Soviet Looking Glass to reality. On the territory of the USSR, all 100 years after the October Revolution, the people are divided into Soviet, and yours, anti-Soviet. In October 1917, the Soviet people captured the country, and was always proud of it, your anti-Soviet people captured your country in YOUR anti-Soviet Perestroika, and cowardly blamed the Soviet people for this. And already by this it is clear who captured the country with good goals, and took responsibility for the country and the people, and who captured the country with criminal goals, and categorically refused to take responsibility for the country and people.
              And I do not have delirium. And according to the same pattern, the enemies of the Communists zombified the people in Maidan -2004 and before the last “Putin election” —that after all this, the people will get better.
              1. tagil 1 June 2020 21: 10 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Well, I won’t argue anymore, but I have one question for you. Tell me the Communists who consider themselves to be them in our country.
                1. tatra 1 June 2020 21: 14 New
                  • 5
                  • 3
                  +2
                  Ha, well, why is it that your anti-Soviet people, who seriously imagined that they are better than the Soviet people, love to discuss the Soviet people, everything that they did, and do not like to discuss themselves, everything that you yourself did in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods ? What kind of problems do you have with your psyche, mentality, because of which you have a manic passion for criticism? Namely, in order to engage in criticism of me and the Communists, you asked this question. All the best, don’t be ill.
                  1. tagil 1 June 2020 21: 29 New
                    • 8
                    • 3
                    +5
                    Ha, well, why is your, anti-Soviet people, seriously imagining that it is better than the Soviet, so loves to discuss the Soviet people
                    If you are not in the know, then the anti-Soviet people left the ranks of the Soviet people (other people do not live in our country). And in the fact that he became anti-Soviet, the Communists exerted all their forces.
                    so does not like to discuss yourself, everything that you yourself did in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods?
                    And I have nothing to discuss myself. In the Soviet period, I served on the border, and during the collapse of the USSR, I also served on the border and defended what was left of my country, defended in the literal sense, with blood, my own and someone else's. And then I defended my country, I didn’t go to rallies, I didn’t tear my throat, and gritted my teeth through the mountains so that you and your kind could rant at the rallies. You, like everyone else, pursue only your goal-POWER. That's all. And I do not see the real Communists in our country, but I see the same militants who will steal from the people no less. Only again will this theft be covered with slogans.
            2. Mordvin 3 2 June 2020 00: 04 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Quote: Tagil
              "Honest Communists and Komsomol members" ended in 1991,

              Do not whistle in dudu.
              1. tagil 2 June 2020 11: 24 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                So whistle in the pioneer horn and count how much comes running to the call, and then you say.
                1. Mordvin 3 2 June 2020 18: 14 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Tagil
                  So whistle in the pioneer horn and count how much comes running to the call, and then you say.

                  I saw an honest communist who, after the 1991th, refused a free apartment.
                  1. tagil 2 June 2020 18: 33 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    And I know honest businessmen who have not stolen a penny from the state and once a month are engaged in helping orphanages for half the amount they earned in a month. And there are many such communists and businessmen in the country?
      2. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 21: 28 New
        • 10
        • 6
        +4
        Quote: tatra
        And what's the point of voting for or against what is already accepted by the authorities? To power on TV crucified about the "popular support of the decisions of the party and government"?

        Colleague love , all right you say. Personally, I have one question, why is he in such a stubborn hurry? Moreover, nature itself was indignant against the first attempt, and the second one is generally a circus, no passports needed, voting in tents or public services, in addition, you can vote in advance from the 25th without explaining the reasons.
        After the Elochk counts, it may turn out that we are 350 million belay
        1. Romey 1 June 2020 21: 42 New
          • 9
          • 5
          +4
          Friends, with a vote, the result is obvious. Here at least go or don’t go. New brochures with this scribble are already on sale. But, apparently, the next one and a half two years will be very interesting. Most likely we will see variations on the theme of a snuffbox or a scarf. Well at the worst end of the station is Bottom. I am more concerned with the question: will it be possible to seize power from the Gref-Kudrino power group?
          1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 21: 59 New
            • 9
            • 9
            0
            Quote: romey
            Friends, with a vote, the result is obvious.

            Hi Kamrad! drinks I absolutely agree, the vote is a dummy, just behind it is the next multi-way point. But the consequences of home sitting and stopping the industry will be healthy by the fall, then everything will come up and tariffs, deferred payments, preparation for the school season, etc. etc.
            And at the expense of intercepting, the majority of the inhabitants want revenge and are ready to "tear the fabric", and we, in turn, must unite with all sane forces, only the broadest coalition, no other is given.
            PySy. Personally, I won’t go to the vote, but please fix that I am “AGAINST”.
            1. Overlock 1 June 2020 22: 31 New
              • 8
              • 0
              +8
              Quote: Stroporez
              Personally, I won’t go to the vote, but please fix that I am “AGAINST”.

              where to fix? On what?
              1. Sling cutter 1 June 2020 22: 37 New
                • 5
                • 5
                0
                Quote: Overlock
                where to fix? On what?

                Camrad hi I personally like Udaltsov’s proposal.
                And what are your suggestions, I will listen with pleasure.
            2. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 05 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Of course you won’t go, you are a citizen of Ukraine!
  • Million 1 June 2020 19: 17 New
    • 13
    • 10
    +3
    I won’t go in principle. I won’t provide them with a turnout, but they’ll write any numbers.
    It's time for Putin to retire
    1. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 06 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Don’t go - drink beer, but we’ll go and we won’t ask you!
  • Sergej1972 1 June 2020 19: 27 New
    • 10
    • 20
    -10
    For me, a number of amendments are more important than zeroing, as if not to relate to it. Therefore, I will vote for.
    1. Mountain shooter 1 June 2020 19: 52 New
      • 10
      • 15
      -5
      Quote: Sergej1972
      For me, a number of amendments are more important than zeroing, as if not to relate to it. Therefore, I will vote for.

      The most faithful position! good
      1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 20: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        How many minusers got divorced here, I am also for amendments.
        Since we are talking about the sovereignty of our country!
  • Cossack 471 1 June 2020 19: 48 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Their conscience is not legitimate. None of those who are now in the Duma should go there again. Otherwise, we will receive a pension so that no one lives before it is received.
  • Tank jacket 1 June 2020 19: 51 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Marriage is the union of a man and a woman!
    1. Romey 1 June 2020 20: 06 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      IIIii ?! Or are rear-wheel drive sneaking up so aggressively that the Family Code is not enough?
      1. Tank jacket 1 June 2020 20: 09 New
        • 5
        • 12
        -7
        Do you like the conservative amendments on the succession of the USSR, the history and memory of the Second World War, God, family and children? So you are a liberal ...
        1. Romey 1 June 2020 20: 29 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Yeah ... And also an agent of the State Department and the SBU. And as an agent, even in pursuit of a fabulous gallery owner. A rear-wheel drive sticks to drive the Constitution does not order?
          1. Tank jacket 1 June 2020 20: 42 New
            • 6
            • 10
            -4
            In the geyrop, they were also silent, like my hut from the edge, and now the juveniles are taking the children away and giving them the rear-wheel drive ... And the LGBT lessons from the kindergarten from 4-6 years old. wassat
            So shta ...
            You are a liberal and Russophobe.
            1. Romey 1 June 2020 21: 28 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              Of course Russophobe. After all, everyone knows that all who are against Putin and his liberal Putinists are Russophobes and liberals. Oh god What a pity and funny you are. I wanted to quench the trochi and lightly troll in order to bring them to white heat (and I know how), but I won’t. And so rzhachno ... I’ll even throw a plus sign.
              1. Tank jacket 1 June 2020 21: 55 New
                • 5
                • 9
                -4
                Five main types of social idiocy:
                Fat burning
                Loyalty
                Liberalism
                Thistle
                Nihilism
                You have gathered liberalism and cleanliness ...
                Two out of five wassat
          2. parusnik 1 June 2020 21: 41 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Yeah ... And also an agent of the State Department and the SBU.
            ... That way in your ear and looking back: "Do you have a Slavic closet for sale?" ... laughing
            1. Romey 1 June 2020 21: 50 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Cabinet sold. I can offer a nickel-plated bed. With a nightstand.
              1. parusnik 1 June 2020 22: 06 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                That's right. With a nightstand. wink
      2. parusnik 1 June 2020 21: 53 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Yes, there are 99% of amendments, these are amendments to the Federal Law, and they will not contradict the Constitution at all ... Or the adoption of the law on volunteering, it will not be unconstitutional at all .. But it’s ridiculous about God how many there should be if our country is multi-religious ..Will there be a department for the management of religious affairs or a council of various religious figures from different faiths? Amendment on the language, that bomb ...
    2. stylet 3 June 2020 13: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Already four are against. Who are these people? Why are they here?
      1. Tank jacket 3 June 2020 20: 10 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        This is tinto breaststroke. lol
  • anjey 1 June 2020 20: 09 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Mishustin, as a digital engineer can offer to vote the whole country in social networks or on public services laughing
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT 2 June 2020 17: 37 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      In Classmates. you don’t even have to vote there, and so everything is visible!))
  • Keyser soze 1 June 2020 20: 34 New
    • 6
    • 5
    +1
    Well, your King logically wants to be reset to zero .... if the other comes, he will sue or don’t let Boh take the money. In California will not run away, the largest in Rostov .... laughing

    Ex, in vain the Empire was filled up, those boyars even fought with Borodin ....
    1. Vadim237 1 June 2020 21: 26 New
      • 4
      • 8
      -4
      In the 2024th Putin will leave since he will be over 70 and it is now clear that he is tired. He will substitute Colonel or General of the GRU or, at worst, Mishustin, and he himself will leave the government for the estate issued by the state and a million-dollar pension.
  • Knell wardenheart 1 June 2020 21: 37 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    100500 appeals to the nation, 100500 postponements of voting dates - as the boss became more and more unsteady acting.
  • Shahno 1 June 2020 22: 13 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    /% The President appointed a new date for voting on amendments to the Constitution //
    It can only mean one thing, all other problems except legal ones have already been solved ...
  • Alien From 1 June 2020 23: 08 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Some kind of surrealism, not elections ...... (
  • awdrgy 1 June 2020 23: 55 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    I’m apparently stupid because I still don’t understand why these amendments and what are the pitfalls (incomprehensible and therefore suspicious) I will trust my intuition and she says that nothing will change from the corrections for ordinary people, but considering incomprehensibility can become worse In general, as always Therefore there’s no point in wasting time on voting. Now, if brandy were handed out for free there, another thing))
  • Antonio_Mariarti 2 June 2020 00: 20 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The only thing that attracts there. That the Russians were designated as the main, or rather state-forming people (after all, this is logically clear), but because of the other amendments I will vote against.
  • aviator6768 2 June 2020 02: 20 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    I repeat, Slack! Old Man and that (with all the certain distrust towards him), behaved more resolutely. In the country, there is confusion due to ARVI (namely, a respiratory virus, such = a bunch: sars, atypical, etc., flu, hepatitis, AIDS, people refine, viruses mutate, this is normal). Scared? No, too lazy .... Another twenty years? I don’t know, we must think hard for everyone ... But the tsar should decide, you won’t be nice to everyone (well, he knows ...)
  • aviator6768 2 June 2020 02: 50 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    In the past, it was unambiguously “For” only in supremacy over international laws. Now - "I am delaying, however ..." (c), how the tsar behaves ... More precisely - nothing ...
    1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 21: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And if we are still robbed and destroyed through these international laws? Maybe this is the last opportunity for the country to break out of the pit. Listen to Deputy Fedorov, this is one of the founders of United Russia, but according to him, if the amendments are passed further, the process of rebuilding the country within the borders of 1945 will begin. Such is the multi-path.
      1. aviator6768 2 June 2020 21: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This is indisputable, you are right. I repeat - this is the only race. grain in the whole undertaking. It only bothers me that under this "sauce" HOW is done.
        1. Herman 4223 2 June 2020 22: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And what exactly bothers except resetting the deadlines?
          All corrections in the case.
          The supremacy of our legal system over the international, the prohibition of officials on dual citizenship, social guarantees. Legal succession from the USSR.
          I won’t list everything, but I didn’t read anything terrible there.
          1. aviator6768 3 June 2020 00: 31 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Constitution! attitude to this ... I repeat - HOW! Maybe the perception of his actions is superimposed under the conditions of this Orvi, but .... Remember how it was adopted in 93. THIS version of the Constitution - without a constitutional assembly, without a nationwide discussion, without a single vote ... Does it not remind me of anything? it’s a prelude .... I’m more annoyed that the same “nulling” is not being brought in against the background of 2003 (oil at 96,7), but now - well, say, “lads, they say, ok, so far so bad but let’s tolerate ... no, Bravura marches - “we have even better than that ... Bloomberg to help you (on finances himself). Political technologists have mixed everything in vain .... It seems ... to the fact that it is necessary to be - 1) frank, 2) to decide, you WILL NOT BE ALL MILES (at least to make an appearance of movement to the people ...)
            1. Herman 4223 3 June 2020 06: 20 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              And who is engaged in this ostentatious brow? MASS MEDIA. And who really controls these media? Yes, the one who pays them the money, the main income of the media is advertising, advertising is mainly associated with Western companies. Western brands roll out good money for their advertising, and allow the TV channel to exist, hire popular presenters, pay wages to employees, and buy expensive equipment. Finance is a powerful lever of pressure. Not one director of the channel and newspaper does not want to stay without them. The authorities have no leverage over the media, censorship is prohibited, Putin cannot remove the director of a television station or newspaper. He does not have the right to throw more money, since he does not manage the economy, the central bank and the ministry of finance are engaged in this independently of other authorities. All that is said and shown in the media is propaganda, and propaganda is not ours. Therefore, ostentatious bravado, which does not correspond to the real state of things, pours into the ears every day, it’s not just like that, it makes people angry.
            2. Herman 4223 3 June 2020 06: 49 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              And one more thing, why the vote is now. You probably don’t taste it, but throughout the past year, there has been a collection of signatures throughout the country to initiate this referendum. Voting this year could also not have happened if it had not been possible to collect more than two million signatures.
              In the media about this deathly silence.
              Well, Putin, of course, was not at a loss either, and took advantage of this in his own interests, I mean zeroing. But as for me, the amendments are worth it.
  • vadimtt 2 June 2020 09: 26 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: Svarog
    will rule to the grave.

    "will rule until the country is reset to zero" - so much more likely laughing
  • yfast 2 June 2020 09: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “In Russia, a temporary ban on fuel imports has come into force” - this is how we should be encouraged to vote for amendments. We are not any rogues to buy cheap fuel. Drivers are already rich people, but they still bring goods to the shops on horseback.
    1. Vadim237 2 June 2020 14: 25 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      You will not be happy with this cheap fuel, because with an easy movement of the fuel seller’s hands this cheap one will be sold at their gas stations at the same price as the domestic one - nobody will refuse to profit from it now, but their producers will suffer in any case by the release of smaller volumes of fuel .
  • Whirlwind 3 June 2020 07: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Voting will not be for amendments, they are accepted. Voting will be FOR CHANGE of the Constitution of the Russian Federation voted by the people in 1993. Such a right has only a source of power - the people of the Russian Federation!
  • Alexander Yaroshenko 6 June 2020 06: 03 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The rat is trying to get out of the bunker .....