Military Review

"Prince Vladimir" quiet course and formidable "Bulava"

51
"Prince Vladimir" quiet course and formidable "Bulava"
A landmark event took place at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk — President Vladimir Putin took part in laying the last generation of the strategic nuclear submarine cruiser Prince Vladimir.

By 2020, we should have already eight such boats of the Borey project - the president set the task for Sevmash.

This is the only shipyard in Russia where nuclear submarines are built. The past of the glorious plant: for all history Naval the fleet 128 nuclear-powered ships were transferred. Today, the Vladimir Monomakh nuclear submarine and the Kazan nuclear submarine are being built at Sevmash, and Yury Dolgoruky, the new-generation nuclear submarine carrier of the new generation, is preparing to transfer to the Russian Navy.

In general, against the background of the traditional cry about the collapse of the army and navy, the news about what is happening with the Russian Navy looks rather strange. If you analyze the flow News this year alone, there is a clear feeling that the rumors about the collapse of our Armed Forces are somewhat exaggerated. Of course, it cannot be compared with Soviet times, when the missile carriers baked like hot cakes, but there is no arms race.

On the eve of the naval sailors holiday, the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, Viktor Chirkov, announced that for the first time in his post-Soviet history, our fleet began a large-scale rearmament: in 2012, naval sailors would receive 10 – 15 ships, including nuclear submarines and frigates. Over the past four years, 15 ships have been accepted into the Navy. The commander also confirmed that Russia could start building new aircraft carriers after 2020, and announced the possible appearance of new locations for our ships in Cuba, Seychelles and Vietnam.

The fact that Russia is vitally important to regain its naval power, recently on the pages of our newspaper, said Academician, Hero of Russia Valentin Pashin, who devoted his whole life to the construction of warships. Pashin cited very alarming figures that the ratio of our defense potential to the US at sea is 1: 10. At the same time, in spite of any declared reboots, our overseas partners do not hide the fact that Russia is still among their enemies. And the general geopolitical situation in the world gives few reasons for carefree relaxation. Apparently, the Russian leadership soberly assesses the incoming information, and therefore has recently paid particular attention to the modernization of the nuclear submarine fleet.
The new submarine of the 955A Borey-A submarine belongs to the fourth generation of atomic strategic rocket carriers.

During the construction of the "Boreyev", new advances are being made in the creation of ship radio electronic equipment and in the reduction of noise. Their main weapon is the new Bulava missile system.

Submarines of this class are intended for launching missile strikes against strategically important military-industrial objects of the enemy.

They are equipped with a pop-up rescue camera, which is designed for the whole crew. The length of the submarine class "Borey" - 170 meters, width - 13,5 meters, depth - 450 meters, crew - 107 people. For self-defense purposes, the boats of the 955 project are equipped with eight torpedo tubes.

By the way, lately, positive processes related to rearmament have been noted in many military areas. More recently, contracts have been concluded for the construction of 48 multi-purpose fighters Su-35, 92 front-line bomber Su-34, 24 deck fighter MiG-29K. Nevertheless, today the situation in the navy definitely looks better than in other branches of the military.

A word to the expert: Igor Korotchenko, chief editor of the magazine "National Defense"

- In the matter of re-equipment, we have made good progress in many areas, but, of course, special attention is paid to the fleet today, since it is precisely this that allows us to project our strength far from our shores.

The country has launched a full-scale program for the construction of new-generation submarines. This applies to both strategic submarines of the Borey class (eight units will be built) and multipurpose Severodvinsk class submarines.

Laid new frigates and corvettes, made by technology "Stealth". Work began on the construction of warships of the ocean zone. The laying of the fourth submarine missile carrier of the 955 project is a sign that Russia has enough potential and power, and all the rumors about the collapse of our armed forces simply do not correspond to reality. Such rumors are part of the information war against our country when they are trying to impress pessimism and humility.

Of course, the United States today is military power No. XXUMX, but we don’t need to enter into a frontal arms race now. There is a negative experience of the USSR, which did not withstand the unbearable burden of military spending, so it is very important to rationally use those 1 trillions of rubles allocated for the state rearmament program. The fleet is a very expensive pleasure; hundreds of enterprises are involved in the production of warships and submarines. In the world, you can count on your fingers countries that can themselves provide the full cycle of construction of nuclear submarines - from development to launch. Thank God, we did not squander the Soviet potential, saved it and even strengthened it.

The fleet rearmament program is being successfully implemented, as long as there is no sequestered planned defense spending.

Of course, in the USSR money was spent much more, but today expenses are more efficient. The Achilles' heel of the Soviet Navy was the absence of points of basing, and the ships developed their resources while on the roadstead. Poor coastal support and living conditions for personnel were poorly organized. Today this situation is changing for the better. For example, in Vilyuchinsk, where the base of the submarine of the Pacific Fleet is located, there are simply excellent conditions for the service and recreation of sailors. There were built good houses and apartments, excellent kindergartens, a naval hospital - all this appeared already in the new century. The first Borei class missile carriers will arrive there, and for them there already is a coastal infrastructure that will extend the life cycle of submarines.

By the way, the return of our fleet to Cam Ranh, which is now talked about, is quite realistic, especially after negotiations with the Vietnamese president and the allocation of a loan of 10 by Russia for billions of dollars for this country. As part of these negotiations, the idea arose of using Kamrani as a point of logistics for the ships of the Pacific Fleet. Today we do not need a full-fledged military base there, it’s enough to have a point in Kamrani where the crews can rest, refuel the ships, carry out routine repairs.
Originator:
http://www.trud.ru
51 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. DEMENTIY
    DEMENTIY 1 August 2012 12: 11
    +7
    but there’s no arms race either.

    Who said such nonsense?
    So maybe well, he nafig money to spend on these "Boreas"?
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 1 August 2012 12: 22
      +16
      Quote: DEMENTIY
      So maybe well, he nafig money to spend on these "Boreas"?

      Well, for such beauty, why not, the amers "like" to the squeak of a pig
      especially stuffed with such a filling
      1. red 015
        red 015 1 August 2012 13: 51
        +7
        terrible beauty! "all the best for American children"
        1. Irkit
          Irkit 1 August 2012 15: 14
          +4
          Children have a future without war. And beautiful toys to politicians, they bastards like nishtyachkovye things on skomunizennye buy. So now let them wait for presents :)
        2. Russian-
          Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 25
          +1
          Quote: red 015
          "all the best for American children"

          And to their parents!
        3. Teploteh - nick
          Teploteh - nick 1 August 2012 20: 37
          0
          Glory to Russia!!! drinks
          Glory to Putin !!! drinks
          Burn in hell Amer and Nate !!! am
          1. vvvvv
            vvvvv 1 August 2012 21: 46
            +2
            Not everyone thinks so ... Now I received it personally (I discuss publicly):
            Patriot Today, 13:03 | Greetings. I express my personal opinion.
            I read a lot of messages, including yours, where Putin supporters with foam at the mouth prove that he is not to blame for anything.
            Putin is not charged with the fact that he is to blame for the tragedy in Crimean, he is charged with something else:
            - he is to blame for the fact that in 12 years he created an exclusively corrupt bureaucratic machine aimed at pumping out resources from the country with the subsequent withdrawal of them abroad
            - he is guilty of creating a system that is incapable of creation and is not aimed at working for the good of the nation
            - he is guilty of the fact that out of 10 rubles allocated from the budget for a particular purpose, 6 rubles is stolen by bureaucrats-henchmen at different levels of his thieves' pyramid
            - he is guilty of creating a system in which no one is responsible for anything
            - he is guilty of the fact that everywhere and everywhere the media under his control at times change the data. A vivid example of such a deception was 167 people against the backdrop of monstrous, according to eyewitnesses of the victims in Krymsk.
            HERE FOR THIS ALL GUILTY PERSONS PERSONALLY! AND, AS IT SEEMS TO ME EARLY OR LATE, WILL BE PUNISHED!

            My opinion is that Putin created what was possible from what is. Maybe he's not a saint, even far away. But, the visible advantages of his activities in my vision outweigh the cons. So, the Patriot (whether?) Did not convince me. I disagree on certain points in many ways.
      2. beech
        beech 1 August 2012 15: 31
        -1
        something I don’t believe in this mace, considering that almost half of the launches were negative !!! Rather, they would build these nuclear submarines, such news would be more frequent, just my heart rejoices !!!
    2. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 1 August 2012 12: 35
      +11
      Life does not teach anything to those who believe in the promises and assurances of the West led by the brazenly Saxons ... Hussein, Milosevic, Gaddafi and many, many others who eat worms in the graves, and the honesty of the West can be told especially colorfully ... unless of course with a medium about a spiritualistic session to agree to turn out.
      In general, according to the old commandment, YOU WANT THE PEACE TO PREPARE FOR WAR!
      So the construction of a fleet that will protect the sovereign interests of RUSSIA is what you can and should spend money on!
    3. aksakal
      aksakal 1 August 2012 12: 54
      +2
      Dementium, the photo is just super! laughing laughing
      1. Drednout
        Drednout 1 August 2012 13: 13
        +2
        Tsar Vladimir laid the prince - namesake. The joke.
        1. Teploteh - nick
          Teploteh - nick 1 August 2012 20: 45
          -2
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          St Petrov

          Hello. You were gone for a long time! To all your comments - only huge and bold +++++++++++++++!
          Glory to Russia!!! drinks
  2. St Petrov
    St Petrov 1 August 2012 12: 13
    +20
    Yes, I said for a long time that alarmism and starperism flourish in Runet =]

    If you do not spend money on Boreas, then the whole country will then pay a triple price for freedom and independence =] without Boreyu more expensive than with them
    1. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 1 August 2012 12: 36
      +2
      + absolutely true!
      1. Irkit
        Irkit 1 August 2012 15: 17
        +1
        There’s a good saying one will do.
        You don’t want to feed your army. Will feed the stranger.
        1. Sablezub
          Sablezub 1 August 2012 22: 18
          +1
          the question is not even whether or not it is necessary to build "boreas" ... here the question is much more global ... Russia at this point in time, and in the future (if any), is the only force keeping the world from a world war. ..Russia has to arm itself, spend huge (earned, not printed) money for not only its own security, but also for the security of the world, no matter how loud it sounds ... "boreas", "cheetahs", t-50, " yars ", s-400, etc., these are the results for which Russia is forced by the realities of the modern world ... another redistribution of the world is underway, with blood, coups, revolutions, and all this under the flag of" global democratization "...
    2. KuigoroZHIK
      KuigoroZHIK 1 August 2012 12: 54
      +1
      only the price will not be "triple", but 30 times higher. With an eye to this, we are building :)
      1. Russian-
        Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 29
        0
        Quote: Kuygorozhik
        will not be "triple", but 30 times higher

        Yes, not at thirty. And posthumously.
    3. Gemar
      Gemar 1 August 2012 13: 01
      0
      c-t Petrov, "alarmism and old-fashionedness" + treacherous naivete coupled with lawlessness = the greatest desire of the West (specifically NATO) and Asia to seize our resources.
  3. klimpopov
    klimpopov 1 August 2012 12: 13
    +5
    The fact that it is vital for Russia to regain its naval power was recently spoken on the pages of our newspaper by the academician, Hero of Russia Valentin Pashin, who devoted his whole life to the construction of warships. Pashin cited very disturbing figures that at sea the ratio of our defense potential to the American is 1: 10. At the same time, despite any declared reloads, our overseas partners do not hide the fact that Russia is still among their enemies.

    In my opinion the obvious thing. if Russia is a sovereign independent state, then it is simply obliged to have a strong army and navy. And spend big money on modern weapons. Then the conditions of Russia to the West will be dictated problematic.

    The mace was adopted by anyone in the know?
  4. St Petrov
    St Petrov 1 August 2012 12: 16
    +6
    everything is ok with a mace.

    The commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, Vice-Admiral Viktor Chirkov, announced the actual adoption of the R-30 Bulava sea-launched intercontinental ballistic missile.
    1. klimpopov
      klimpopov 1 August 2012 12: 18
      +1
      And they are going to bring it in the process, as I understand it?
      Thank you
      1. SSR
        SSR 1 August 2012 13: 28
        +2
        Now stopudovo will have to finish ... the traitor was found among persons .. involved in the development of the Mace.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 1 August 2012 13: 47
          +4
          if they found him - they grazed him - if they grazed him - they could push him to misinformation. here, too, everything is ambiguous.
          1. Russian-
            Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 31
            0
            Quote: s-t Petrov
            if they found him - they grazed him - if they grazed him - they could push him to misinformation. here, too, everything is ambiguous

            100% to the point
            And the information itself - as it were, was not particularly significant. Because they didn’t give much - although I would have killed him
        2. klimpopov
          klimpopov 1 August 2012 13: 48
          +1
          no matter how there was sabotage over the mace, the story is completely strange and there are many unsuccessful launches.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 1 August 2012 14: 01
            +4
            FSB is working. There is no reason to doubt this =]
  5. Kaa
    Kaa 1 August 2012 12: 17
    +8
    "cruisers last generation "Prince Vladimir".
    For such words ... Not the last, but the extreme!
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 1 August 2012 12: 35
      +5
      Quote: Kaa
      For such words ... Not the last, but the extreme!

      A colleague, an article written by people far from the army and army concepts ..., the troops already tapped for similar things in the troops negative ..
  6. with
    with 1 August 2012 12: 23
    +10
    Go Russia!!!
  7. White
    White 1 August 2012 12: 25
    +9
    That's what submarines in the union know, and now in Russia they know how to do it.
    Submarine missile carriers are probably the only component of the triad that is guaranteed to strike back in which case
    1. Russian-
      Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 36
      +1
      Quote: White
      Submarine missile carriers are probably the only component of the triad that is guaranteed to strike back in which case

      The guaranteed answer - in any case - will apply all the components of the triad in such a way - the Perimeter system - (dead hand) - no one has yet canceled. The submarines are designed more for finishing off.
  8. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 1 August 2012 12: 27
    +6
    With the help of its navy, Russia protects not only its territory and independence, but also its economic interests in the world. if they give up, then the losses will be many times higher than the cost of the same "Boreyev"
    1. Russian-
      Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 36
      0
      Quote: lewerlin53rus
      Because if they give up

      This is in principle unacceptable
      1. lewerlin53rus
        lewerlin53rus 1 August 2012 23: 21
        0
        Quote: Russ -
        This is in principle unacceptable

        This is unacceptable ABSOLUTELY !!
  9. pirat1966
    pirat1966 1 August 2012 12: 34
    +6
    We need a camran, colleagues will understand me wink
    1. vadimN
      vadimN 1 August 2012 12: 51
      +5
      and Cuba ... as well as Angola, Syria, Egypt ..., and India would be nice! drinks
      1. with
        with 1 August 2012 12: 52
        +3
        Quote: vadimN
        and Cuba ... as well as Angola, Syria, Egypt ..., and India would be nice!

        Maybe cheaper to ruin the United States ???))) bully
        1. vadimN
          vadimN 1 August 2012 13: 03
          +2
          Please provide a feasibility study for the collapse of the United States. The numbers will show ... laughing
        2. lelikas
          lelikas 1 August 2012 13: 33
          +1
          Or rent immediately there a place for the base, because once they say that we are friends now let them help the place in a friendly way.
  10. Drappier
    Drappier 1 August 2012 12: 39
    +1
    when the missile carriers baked like hot cakes, but this is definitely not necessary, better quality.
  11. Yuras222
    Yuras222 1 August 2012 12: 45
    +3
    Not everything is measured by money, the genocide of the people and the collapse of the country with money can not be returned. Money is not a goal, but only one of the means to achieve a goal. And the real goal is a strong country with weight on the international scene, a developed economy, wealthy, protected citizens.
  12. leon-iv
    leon-iv 1 August 2012 12: 58
    +2
    New frigates and corvettes made using the Stealth technology are presented.
    But why does pr 22350 have such a slow pace of construction?
    IMHO, these ships should already be in operation along with the Mistrals and they are fucking
  13. Bronis
    Bronis 1 August 2012 13: 01
    +1
    Judging by the photographs, Borey has almost formed a solid body. So this is not a "laying ceremony", but rather a "completion ceremony", which pleases. Strategic cruisers confidently went into production. Now I would also do the same with multipurpose nuclear submarines and diesel-electric submarines.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 1 August 2012 13: 37
      +1
      So far this is only one section, but only for now.
      1. altman
        altman 1 August 2012 15: 45
        0
        I read that the corps is practically formed at "Prince Vladimir" ..
        1. Russian-
          Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 38
          0
          Quote: altman
          "Prince Vladimir" ..

          Surname only do not tell anyone - Shhh. wink
      2. altman
        altman 2 August 2012 12: 06
        0
        those who minus me..http: //www.armstass.su/? page = article & aid = 109197 & cid = 25
  14. Nechai
    Nechai 1 August 2012 13: 01
    0
    Quote: met
    and Cuba ... as well as Angola, Syria, Egypt ..., and India would be nice!
    Maybe cheaper to ruin the United States ???))

    The presence of the above Vadim will contribute to the collapse of the USA, or vice versa, prosperity, strengthening their power, do you think?
    1. vadimN
      vadimN 1 August 2012 13: 14
      +1
      The question is not simple. In a country with a well-organized economy, the growth of military spending contributes to the growth of the entire economy, especially if the warriors invest in high technology, which will soon be transferred to the civilian sphere.
      From a moral and ethical point of view, the thesis "war raises the economy" looks absurd and savage, but in life it is still so.

      I say "still" only because the classical Western economies are in deep w @ ne. I would really not like them to solve economic problems by military means. On the other hand, our economy is not yet ready to effectively confront these comrades in the military sphere.
      Other methods and instruments of reorganization and management of the World should come to the fore. In my opinion, this is something like a structureless management according to Efimov (google and rite). But these mechanisms require a different understanding of everything and everything and investing a lot of money in media assets, ideology, propaganda ... and neutralizing the current mechanisms of structureless management, launched not in the interests of Russia.
      1. Drappier
        Drappier 1 August 2012 13: 32
        0
        In Russia there is mineral wealth, that's the whole economy, in the West there is an economy "what he made and sold" and "where he bought it cheaper" laughing and cheaper in China, that's the whole crisis
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 1 August 2012 13: 49
          +3
          in China do not buy steam generators for nuclear power plants, and other high technology stuff =]

          everyone forgets about the collapse at the snot, to say that the peaceful atom of Russia is a trendsetter and the first in the list of progress =]

          And so you can walk through many areas of industry.
  15. 8 company
    8 company 1 August 2012 13: 19
    +6
    Rumors that everything in Russia has been stolen, sold out and collapsed is somewhat exaggerated wink
  16. Eleven
    Eleven 1 August 2012 13: 38
    +5


    Putin made it clear to Amers that he was ready for war.
    Prince Vladimir against the aircraft carrier J. Bush,)))
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 1 August 2012 13: 48
      +4
      there is a prediction that we will deftly write n * hell to anyone in the 21st century bully
      1. Eleven
        Eleven 1 August 2012 16: 06
        0
        For this, we all Russians should work tirelessly. But we are unlikely to succeed, STALIN is not on us)))
        1. Russian-
          Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 39
          +3
          Quote: Helen
          STALIN is not on us

          Putin should be enough - simply obliged - otherwise nothing!
      2. Russian-
        Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 39
        0
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        there is a prediction that we will deftly write n * hell to anyone in the 21st century

        So it will be !!! drinks
    2. Russian-
      Russian- 1 August 2012 19: 38
      +1
      Quote: Helen
      Prince Vladimir vs. aircraft carrier George W. Bush

      Super!
  17. PiP
    PiP 1 August 2012 13: 56
    0
    Still, a couple of new BDKs for each fleet, and then it would be safe to say that Russia is able to defend its interests anywhere in the world in any war (global || local)
  18. olifus
    olifus 1 August 2012 14: 07
    -2
    Again Vovchik was forced into the "left" section of the boat for screwing on the "board", because the durable hull of Prince Vladimir has long been ready, and in the photo there is a usual section wink
    1. altman
      altman 1 August 2012 15: 47
      +1
      That's right .. read about it recently, but not on this site
      1. olifus
        olifus 1 August 2012 19: 29
        +1
        Quote: altman
        That's right .. read about it recently, but not on this site

        And I look at the "especially enlightened" ones, but what I wrote above is really so and the information was taken not from the ceiling, but from the construction site of this submarine. This boat has been under construction at Sevmash, if memory serves, since 2009 and initially it was supposed to be called "St. Nicholas", but for some reason they outplayed.
  19. mr.Man
    mr.Man 1 August 2012 14: 58
    +1
    ... today the situation in the Navy clearly looks better than in other branches of the army ...
    Of course, the "Italian" mafia in the MO could not bribe the naval ... smile
  20. Ortrega
    Ortrega 1 August 2012 19: 13
    +1
    One gets the impression that we were in a drinking bout for a long time, but now the moment came when the peasant woke up in the morning, looked in the mirror, then outside belay and said: "Everything is good to drink, it's time to get smart, otherwise some civilians relaxed without me fellow
    We have Russians such a feature, but better late than never good