Military Review

In India: China creates a wide front for possible invasion

44

In India, it is reported that China continues to work on increasing the number of troops on the Indian borders. We are talking about territories that are controversial. In India, these territories are called Ladakh. This is a mountainous region where some time ago China began to modernize the infrastructure of a military base.


In New Delhi, they claim that this is a “flagrant violation of the 2013 agreement.” Based on this agreement, none of the parties should deploy military contingents in certain border areas and should not be involved in monitoring border patrols. The agreement states that only border forces may be present in Ladakh.

India accuses China of up to 1,5 PLA ​​troops in the Ladakh region. It is alleged that this is heating up the situation, which is already difficult, especially after the skirmish between the Indian and Chinese soldiers that took place a few weeks ago.

In India, they write that the Chinese military are concentrated on the northern shore of Lake Pangong, as well as in the Galvan Valley region.

In India: China creates a wide front for possible invasion


The PLA also accumulated additional troops on its territory near the places specified in the agreement. China simply left over 5000 soldiers in the area after the exercises. This creates a wide front for a possible invasion of Indian territory.

In China, they reject these allegations, claiming that there are no violations on their part. The fact is that China does not consider the Indian territories in Ladakh what India considers as such. It is this uncompromising position of both nuclear powers that strives to spill over into another border conflict.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 29 May 2020 07: 04 New
    +1
    In New Delhi, they claim that this is a “flagrant violation of the 2013 agreement.”
    Naivnyak, China and the agreement. fool Signed a peace agreement with China, get ready for war. request
    1. Basil50
      Basil50 29 May 2020 07: 18 New
      -6
      It’s enough * funny * to observe the territorial claims of countries that were recently colonies. The borders of the colonies were cut specifically to create conflicts between all who lived in these territories. The colonialists did not hide their goals.
      The owners have already gone home with the loot, and the countries that were former colonies are fighting beyond the borders of each other. At the same time, about his * centuries-old culture * and about * centuries-old history *, and much more ...
      1. RUSS
        RUSS 29 May 2020 13: 13 New
        -2
        Quote: Vasily50
        The borders of the colonies were cut specifically to create conflicts between all who lived in these territories.

        Before writing this, specify about the division of British India, Muslims themselves were the initiators of the section
      2. Fishery
        Fishery 29 May 2020 17: 59 New
        -5
        so after all, the former USSR behaves exactly the same way now))))))))))))
      3. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 29 May 2020 19: 25 New
        +2
        Quote: Vasily50
        It’s enough * funny * to observe territorial claims countries that were recently colonies.

        Amuse us by indicating whose colony China was recently ....
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Paul Siebert
          Paul Siebert 30 May 2020 08: 36 New
          0
          Quote: Lara Croft
          Quote: Vasily50
          It’s enough * funny * to observe territorial claims countries that were recently colonies.

          Amuse us by indicating whose colony China was recently ....

          Larochka, during World War II, most of China was occupied by Japan.
          "Land of the Rising Sun" called China - "Overseas colonies".
          1. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 30 May 2020 13: 11 New
            0
            Quote: Paul Siebert
            Quote: Lara Croft
            Quote: Vasily50
            It’s enough * funny * to observe territorial claims countries that were recently colonies.

            Amuse us by indicating whose colony China was recently ....

            Larochka, during World War II, most of China was occupied by Japan.
            "Land of the Rising Sun" called China - "Overseas colonies".

            Yes, she can call anyone ...
            An occupation (from lat. occupatio - “seizure, occupation”) in the general case - occupation by the armed forces of a state of territory not belonging to it, not accompanied by the acquisition of sovereignty over it, usually temporary. Occupation should be distinguished from annexation, the act of accession by the state of all or part of another’s territory unilaterally.

            In general, the Japanese have always been able to wag their tongues, as now ...
            The Japanese Foreign Ministry unilaterally decided to declare the southern islands of the Kuril Ridge its territory.

            https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5b31312dcb54e600a96a3f40/iaponiia-obiavila-svoimi-iujnye-kurily-zachem-5ec524e1042ceb70f0bfd559
            This does not mean that the Kuril Islands are Japanese territories?
    2. Civil
      Civil 29 May 2020 07: 26 New
      +6
      1. The giant China believed in itself. So our country will come. And another war will destroy the country in every sense.
      2. The principle of salami, small pieces will cut off pieces of the territory itself, without causing strong resistance.
      3. Oil will rise in price.
      1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
        Boris ⁣ Shaver 29 May 2020 07: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Giant China believed in its strength

        Are you on the basis of their butts with the Indians? So, then, from the 60s he still believed.
      2. alone
        alone 29 May 2020 10: 21 New
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        3. Oil will rise in price.
        Reply

        What is the benefit to China from the fact that the price of oil rises? China is now buying very cheap oil and is very pleased judging by the size of purchases
      3. businessv
        businessv 30 May 2020 23: 28 New
        0
        Quote: Civil
        The giant China believed in itself. So our country will come. And another war will destroy the country in every sense.

        Colleague, either write more clearly or shorter! Is it our country's turn to believe in our own strengths? Or China's strength? Another war between China and India will destroy whose country in every sense? Or is it like this: China believed in its own strength, so it will look to Russia, which will simply disappear with its entire nuclear triad if China attacks it? The "salami principle" does not work with countries with nuclear arsenal, colleague! hi
    3. Normal ok
      Normal ok 29 May 2020 14: 47 New
      -1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      In New Delhi, they claim that this is a “flagrant violation of the 2013 agreement.”
      Naivnyak, China and the agreement. fool Signed a peace agreement with China, get ready for war. request

      Whatever China entertains, if only it does not engage in global expansion))
      1. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 29 May 2020 19: 27 New
        +1
        Quote: Normal ok
        Whatever China entertains, if only it does not engage in global expansion))

        He’ll take it when he’s ready for this ....
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 29 May 2020 07: 05 New
    +3
    ALL have problems that are difficult to solve ... the "simplest" way to distract the population about current troubles / problems! Not cheap, but angry ... besides, easily controlled by the authorities.
  3. Doccor18
    Doccor18 29 May 2020 07: 05 New
    +6
    1500, 5000 soldiers are still not the numbers to speak of a "major invasion". The Indians are pumping, but you need to keep the powder dry. The Chinese are pragmatic down to the tips of their hair. They will see a weakness and .... long live the PLA!
    1. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 29 May 2020 07: 52 New
      +2
      Quote: Doccor18
      1500, 5000 soldiers are still not the numbers to speak of a "major invasion"

      For the Chinese, a unit of up to 10 thousand people. - This is so, head watch.
    2. businessv
      businessv 30 May 2020 23: 31 New
      0
      Quote: Doccor18
      1500, 5000 soldiers are still not the same numbers

      They recalled an anecdote about the quiet seizure of a neighboring country by China "in small groups of 15000 people in each ..." smile
  4. Break through
    Break through 29 May 2020 07: 08 New
    -5
    China is not up to India. He has problems above the roof. Hong Kong, Taiwan, etc.
    1. Graz
      Graz 29 May 2020 08: 30 New
      +5
      China has one and a half billion people. they have enough people to conduct several conflicts at once, and China is still stronger than the Indians both industrially and collectively, we should strain ourselves, because in the Chinese media there are many and often lick at our territories and wonder how they are, they were before Chinese
      1. Terenin
        Terenin 29 May 2020 09: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: Graz
        in the Chinese media a lot and often lick their lips on our territories

        Yes, it’s not a simple neighbor downstairs. By the way, both right and left ... winked
      2. Alexander Seklitsky
        Alexander Seklitsky 29 May 2020 10: 00 New
        +1
        Quote: Graz
        China has one and a half billion people. they have enough people to conduct several conflicts at once,

        You are confusing the concepts of civilians and the armed forces .. So there is no need to spread heresy. The fact that some kind of "pan-headed" Chinese sprinkled on the Internet does not mean the position of the Chinese leadership.
      3. Tank hard
        Tank hard 30 May 2020 17: 57 New
        +1
        Quote: Graz
        China has one and a half billion people. they have enough people to conduct several conflicts at once

        Are there enough resources? repeat Germany didn’t do it at one time ... request
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 May 2020 07: 09 New
    -1
    Will they be able to push their foreheads? Two nuclear powers, in total nearly half the world's population! For what, who can explain? Who benefits - without words it is clear. But the rulers of the countries themselves do not understand?
    1. Horror
      Horror 29 May 2020 07: 20 New
      -5
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Who benefits - without words it is clear. But the rulers of the countries themselves do not understand?

      The West is sleeping and sees how to arrange another slaughter .. If it is bled, then there will be a concrete batch .. And they can bred, especially considering that India has the systems of the USA, Israel, etc. What a self-start and away we go!
      Remember Argentina in the Falkland Conflict .. I remember American weapons (missile bombs) that suddenly began to refuse to explode .. China would not have climbed into this trap.
    2. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 29 May 2020 07: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      the rulers of countries themselves - do not understand?

      It is that one understands very well. The main thing, God forbid, is to recognize China's sovereignty over the "returned" territories. Maybe no one will ask us, but there may be dirty tricks with the initiative to make the partner pleasant. fool Maybe in recognition, that Crimea recognizes ... request
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 May 2020 07: 21 New
    +4
    Local conflicts over territorial claims can last for decades about which there is enough evidence, incl. and on the territory of the former USSR. It is clear that in such cases, each side blames the other. But attention is drawn to the fact that as soon as the Americans cleared out to India with their "business proposals", the conflict sparked with renewed vigor. The bad news is that these are two nuclear powers and who can guarantee that tactical nuclear weapons will not be used in the event of a major armed conflict?
  7. nobody111body
    nobody111body 29 May 2020 07: 31 New
    0
    however, there are still "disputed" territories between Syria and a certain Israel; and here's another "controversial" territory between Mexico and the United States, there are already two "controversial" states; and a bunch of American Jews are not increasing their presence on the border with Mexico? or only the fence will help out-an article is somehow ambiguous chtoli
    1. Graz
      Graz 29 May 2020 08: 32 New
      +1
      you garden plant with your finger do not compare these incomparable categories
  8. Free wind
    Free wind 29 May 2020 08: 13 New
    +1
    Yes, let them get together. It’s good for us. Only India will be bad. In the event of a conflict with China, Pakistan and Myanmar will immediately get in. They have long-standing graters there, from the time of the British and French.
  9. Civil
    Civil 29 May 2020 08: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
    Quote: Civil
    Giant China believed in its strength

    Are you on the basis of their butts with the Indians? So, then, from the 60s he still believed.

    This is based on the availability of the first world economy for example. Not to mention advanced science and management systems.
  10. Slavutich
    Slavutich 29 May 2020 08: 27 New
    +1
    Friendship of peoples however
  11. Tochilka
    Tochilka 29 May 2020 08: 55 New
    +1
    By the way, it would be interesting to read the article how they serve in the armies of China and India. How do soldiers teach, do reservists call for training camps, etc.
  12. knn54
    knn54 29 May 2020 09: 01 New
    +1
    C and Modi are strong leaders and stand on the platform of nationalism.
    And the partnership on the SCO and BRICS is a weak argument.
    India is also worried that Nepal, Seychelles and Sri Lanka are increasingly drawing closer to China. Taking Pakistan into account, we get a regional "Anaconda".
  13. Vitauts
    Vitauts 29 May 2020 10: 21 New
    -4
    Maybe we will call a spade a spade?
    Russian law does not apply in Chechnya.
    Kadyrov can do absolutely everything he wants in Chechnya, and almost everything he wants in Moscow.
    Putin pays Kadyrov huge amounts, which he spends entirely at his discretion, in fact it is reparation ...
    This, of course, is your personal affair, of the Russian people, but for me it is surprising ... and thinking about how it will end sooner or later.
    1. ApJlekuHo
      ApJlekuHo 29 May 2020 12: 06 New
      +1
      Kadyrov can do absolutely everything he wants in Chechnya, and almost everything he wants in Moscow.

      Do you live in Chechnya? Or in Moscow? Or is it still in Lithuania?
      Putin pays huge sums to Kadyrov

      Data on personal money transfers, Putin Kadyrov? Or is it still the budget of one of the regions of Russia?
      This, of course, is your personal affair, of the Russian people, but for me it is surprising ... and thinking about how it will end sooner or later.

      Absolutely, this is our own business, in which regions and how much we should invest. You are better off with your fascists, sort it out in your own country, otherwise they will soon be told the face and your country will end.
    2. Tank hard
      Tank hard 30 May 2020 18: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: Vitauts
      This, of course, is your personal affair, of the Russian people, but for me it is surprising ... and thinking about how it will end sooner or later.

      Funny comment from
      Vitauts (Vitauts)
      But don’t worry, it’s really not your business ... wink
  14. Zanika
    Zanika 29 May 2020 10: 38 New
    -3
    I think the article was written by Western analysts .. The Indian conflict with China, many US problems would be solved ..
    1. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 29 May 2020 11: 55 New
      -1
      It also seems to me that the article is rotten. Type - India sees ...... China places .... Considers does not consider its territory.
      1. Zanika
        Zanika 29 May 2020 13: 00 New
        -3
        Quote: Interlocutor
        It also seems to me that the article is rotten. Type - India sees ...... China places .... Considers does not consider its territory.

        I think there will be many such articles soon, as well as about Belarus! wink
  15. Junior Private
    Junior Private 29 May 2020 12: 28 New
    0
    Quote: Yellow Dwarf
    The time will come and China will also begin to squeeze the territory of the Russian Federation! Now he is robbing the resources of the Russian Federation and is slowly squeezing territory by meter.

    What, right at night, move the border posts?
    1. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 29 May 2020 13: 35 New
      0
      And what is China robbing from us?
  16. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 May 2020 14: 01 New
    0
    Pakistan-India-China. Constantly quarrels over the border territories.
    Now the claims are leaving and calm down.
  17. 川 建国
    川 建国 2 June 2020 11: 11 New
    +1
    As far as I know, Indian news daily covers confrontations on the border between China and India, while China covers only the liberation army exercises held somewhere on a plateau