Analyst in the USA: To understand the role of Russia in the Middle East, one needs to evaluate its history since the time of Peter I

89

American analyst Robert Rabeel presented material in which he said that the United States mistakenly perceived the map of the Middle East. According to Robert Rabil, this misreading has a number of negative consequences, including erroneous conclusions. An example is given of the thesis that was uttered in the United States for several years. This thesis sounds like "Assad must leave."

In the publication The National Interest, the author writes that from the very beginning of the Syrian armed conflict, American authorities predicted the "collapse of the regime" of Bashar al-Assad.



Rabil writes that both the series of recent media publications about the allegedly “tired of the Assad regime of Russia” and that “Moscow is curtailing the support of Damascus” leads to a misinterpretation of what is actually happening in the SAR.

Rabil for NI:

Such a reading of the political map of the Middle East and Russian politics in Syria is fraught with erroneous assumptions similar to those that predicted the collapse of the Syrian regime in the first months of the Syrian confrontation.

Rabil, who has authored publications like Damascus for Dummies and Why Assad Doesn’t Bother Obama (from 2011), says that American analytical and political circles are still making a mistake. The author notes the following: today in the USA they pay attention to what the media write about Assad’s high corruption and that no more than a third of the country's population would vote for him. Rabil says that even the State Department is based on these statements, shaping its Middle East policy.

From the article:

The State Department of Rights, arguing that Russia uses military power, proxies, and misinformation to expand its influence. However, it is completely wrong to limit Russian politics to the aforementioned dubious foreign policy instruments.

The analyst believes that Russian influence in the Middle East is made up of many factors, many of which are overlooked in the same State Department. According to Rabil, it would be worth appreciating history Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of the victory of Russia over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnayijsky peace treaty."

Rabil:

The role that disappeared after the collapse of the Soviet Union once again turned into a vengeful tone under Putin, combining elements of geopolitics, the ideological opposition of the great power of the American unipolar international system and religious pluralism based on the fight against radical Islamism and the support of religious minorities.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    89 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +12
      28 May 2020 08: 34
      To understand the role of Russia in the Middle East, we need to evaluate its history since the time of Peter I

      ... and before Peter the Great - especially smile
      1. +5
        28 May 2020 08: 48
        According to Rabil, it would be worthwhile to evaluate the history of Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of Russia's victory over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty."


        in general, the Kuchukkarnadzhi world was concluded at the time of E2 and Peter has nothing to do with it. This slave / Rabil is bad with history, one word is pin_day.
        1. +8
          28 May 2020 08: 59
          The analyst believes that Russian influence in the Middle East is made up of many factors, many of which are overlooked in the same State Department. According to Rabil, it would be worthwhile to evaluate the history of Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of Russia's victory over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty."

          American analysts are being shy as always. The US has already got everyone on the BV. After Russia "left" the region in the 90s, the United States had carte blanche, but the "wise" American heads disposed of these circumstances in their own style - they destroyed Iraq, strengthened Iran, launched the Islamists, supported the "Arab spring", chaos and war. Now American analysts have gotten into the historical jungle, into the history of Russia. How cute.

          "Than the gossips count to work,
          Isn't it better to turn on yourself, godfather? "-
          Bear answered her. (with)
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +3
          28 May 2020 09: 22
          For an American, this is an achievement. But they are really simplistic looking at everything in these articles
          1. +2
            28 May 2020 14: 27
            Quote: alexmach
            But they are really simplistic looking at everything in these articles

            What kind of education, such a vision. Clip. If it’s difficult to explain in detail, with evidence, they will get confused, get tired of listening, do not understand, draw incorrect conclusions. Comics are all of them.
        4. -1
          28 May 2020 09: 41
          Quote: Bar1
          in general, the Kuchukkarnadzhi world was concluded at the time of E2 and Peter has nothing to do with it. This slave / Rabil is bad with history, one word is pin_day.

          In the phrase after the sentence about Peter there is a conjunction "and". And then - the proposal for a victory over the Ottoman Empire, which no longer applies to Peter. Then there is one more union "and", and only then the contract is mentioned.

          So Amer correctly built a series of events, the only observation-struggle with the Ottomans began before Peter, remember Battle of Molodi.
          1. +1
            28 May 2020 11: 38
            Quote: Olgovich
            In the phrase after the sentence about Peter there is a conjunction "and".

            actually, Peter blasted the war with Turkey, maybe you remember, therefore this slave said essentially so,

            Russia needs to be assessed by losses of the times of Peter and wins of the times of E2.

            it is either zaum or nonsense.
      2. +5
        28 May 2020 08: 49
        It would be worthwhile to evaluate the history of Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of Russia's victory over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty."

        But Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty, it is only intermediate stage in the consistent policy of Catherine the Great, who became an episode on the way of Russia to the status of a great power, the most powerful country in the world at that time ...
        1. -7
          28 May 2020 11: 44
          Quote: Insurgent
          But the Kuchuk-Karnayijsky peace treaty is only an intermediate stage in the consistent policy of Catherine the Great, which became an episode on the way of Russia to the status of a great power, the most powerful country in the world at that time


          Russia waged wars with Turkey since the time of Ivan the Terrible in the OI and including the 20th century, so that E2 ruined the Cossacks and Tartaria does not mean that the Russian people won, the Russians became slaves to E2 and other Germans. And the "great" Romanovs lost ALL WAR 19 -20th century from Napoleon.
          1. 0
            28 May 2020 16: 11
            Quote: Bar1
            therefore, that E2 ravaged the Cossacks and Tartaria

            Ohhhhh, here’s the Fonmenkovism ...
            Next to such a "deep" historical knowledge of this amersky expert, it really does not look so poor ..
            1. -3
              28 May 2020 18: 20
              Quote: Albert1988
              Quote: Bar1
              therefore, that E2 ravaged the Cossacks and Tartaria

              Ohhhhh, here’s the Fonmenkovism ...
              Next to such a "deep" historical knowledge of this amersky expert, it really does not look so poor ..

              if only not for Abramovism ...
        2. 5-9
          -2
          28 May 2020 12: 41
          the most powerful country in that period in the world

          Do not exaggerate, we just stood on a par with France (the coolest at that time), Britain and Austria ...
          1. +1
            28 May 2020 14: 28
            Quote: 5-9
            Do not exaggerate, we just stood on a par with France

            France? Is it the very one whose capital will enter the troops of Emperor Alexander I, the grandson of Catherine in 1814?
            And where will the Cossacks scratch the not-too-agile French garcon-clerks and waiters with the words "Quickly, quickly"?
            1. 5-9
              +3
              28 May 2020 14: 38
              It was like talking about the times of Catherine the 2nd, it seemed ... and then France tore 13 American colonies from Britain, and even after the mess of the revolution it was beaten off from a bunch of interventionists.
              Yes, and before our (along with the British and Prussians) entry into Paris, France cancerized all of Europe, including, unfortunately, us ... all the battles on the fields of Europe with the Antichrist were lost, except for Preisis Elau which was a draw, and Buonaparte in Moscow time visited.
              And even after that, France was among the great powers ... RI and BI were certainly cooler, but still cool ...
              1. 0
                28 May 2020 14: 44
                Quote: 5-9
                It’s like about the times of Catherine the 2nd, it was like ...

                It was about the fact that Russia during the reign became a great power. And contemporaries spoke of the Empress herself, that without her permission no gun in Europe would fire. And this was not a hyperbole, but a sober assessment of the potential and influence of Russia for that period, which lasted even after the death of Catherine, but somewhat faded into the short reign of her short-sighted son ...
                And her grandson, although burdened by the burden of power, managed to resist the "united Europe" under the command of Napoleon ...
                1. 5-9
                  +1
                  28 May 2020 15: 02
                  You greatly exaggerate the role of Russia in world politics at that time .... we became on a par (and conditionally, because we were periphery and got involved on the side of one or another European force, and not a warrior alone in the field) with great powers, no more ... our hegemony in Europe was only under Nikolai Pavlovich and the USSR
                  1. +1
                    28 May 2020 16: 12
                    Quote: 5-9
                    our hegemony in Europe was only under Nikolai Pavlovich

                    Just during this period, everything was not thank God, for it ended in the Crimean War ...
                    1. 5-9
                      0
                      28 May 2020 16: 19
                      Well ... decades of hegemony were ... and the USSR also finished not very well ....
                      And what about the Crimean War? They fought with their left heel against half of the "civilized world", of the losses - half of the city in the dupa of the world ... hurtful, annoying, but pushed for long-overdue reforms ... the "winners" as a result of the fall of governments with a debt crisis and, well, oooooo very unpleasant memories. ..nobody is essentially unnecessary and in many respects an accidental war of curves with the blind ... the standard of mediocrity of all participants
                      1. 0
                        28 May 2020 16: 21
                        Quote: 5-9
                        and the USSR also finished not very well

                        The Union had a hegemonic period much longer ...
                        Quote: 5-9
                        And what about the Crimean War?

                        Quote: 5-9
                        nobody essentially needed and in many ways a random war of curves with the blind ... the standard of mediocrity of all participants

                        Nevertheless, for Russia the consequences were very serious ..
                        1. 5-9
                          0
                          28 May 2020 16: 27
                          Which ones? Do not build a fleet at the World Cup? So then there was a revolution in shipbuilding, after 5-7-10 years, ships and weapons were godlessly outdated ... and we have a poor country and a weak industry, we don’t need such a toy (RYAV, PMV and WWII showed the helplessness of the fleet, and the resources in it swelled a break) ....
                          Honor was reduced, the unnecessary expansion was over .... they realized their real place in the world ... and the results were greatly exaggerated by Soviet propaganda, for example, rotting tsarism
      3. +10
        28 May 2020 09: 13
        You are right .. we should begin to understand BV .. with Daniil Romanovich Galitsky !! Prince of Volyn in 1215–1229, 1231–1233 and 1235–1238, the Grand Duke of Kiev (1240), King of Russia from 1254, politician, diplomat and commander, son of Roman Mstislavich (from the senior branch of the Monomakhovichi) and Efrosinya-Anna.
        1. +5
          28 May 2020 09: 49
          Quote: Atlant-1164
          king of Russia since 1254

          All true. Yes Although the royal title is not at all characteristic of medieval Russia, sometimes Russian princes accepted it.
        2. +6
          28 May 2020 11: 47
          Daniil Galitsky "King of Russia" was in charge of only a fragment of Russia. His title (given by the Pope by a Catholic) was not quoted in Orthodox Russia. (Now they also propose to call Ukraine Rus and Zelensky can be called the President of All Russia ...). Even Daniel's children were embarrassed to bear this title. Then, when this territory was ceded to Poland, they (the Poles) became "Russian kings" ... Daniel's policy in the B. East has nothing to do with the policy of the Russian state!
      4. +3
        28 May 2020 12: 10
        I completely agree ... even with the "non-brothers" Ivan the Terrible fought in Libya, not in Livonia ...
      5. +18
        29 May 2020 01: 31
        They will not be able to appreciate our history, but before Peter the Great and even more so. smile
    2. +6
      28 May 2020 08: 39
      Shaping state policy after reading media reports is a very ill-considered step ....
      1. +6
        28 May 2020 08: 51
        To ask the daddy-president to shy away on "sinister", having read social networks - even more so. = _ =
        1. +3
          28 May 2020 08: 53
          Quote: Kuroneko
          To ask the daddy-president to shy away on "sinister", having read social networks - even more so. = _ =

          Surely "daddy" should have jumped at least somewhere! A good reason was found!
    3. +3
      28 May 2020 08: 45
      The mind can’t understand Russia, it’s impossible to measure arshin ..
      The answer to all Western analysts and other singers .. hi
      1. -7
        28 May 2020 08: 51
        Quote: Naemnik
        The mind can’t understand Russia, it’s impossible to measure arshin ..


        In any way, arshins are also useless.
        So how to understand Russia?
        Tell me, my friend.
        1. +6
          28 May 2020 09: 09
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          So how to understand Russia?
          Tell me, my friend.

          Why do you need it? You have chosen a different country for yourself, as I understand it ...
          1. -4
            28 May 2020 09: 25
            Quote: Volodin
            Quote: Maki Avellievich
            So how to understand Russia?
            Tell me, my friend.

            Why do you need it? You have chosen a different country for yourself, as I understand it ...


            Although I live on the Milky Way, sometimes I even think about the distant Alpha Centaur.
            Your personal interests do not extend beyond your district center?

            ps you're right, in the Ukrainian SSR I no longer live, but Russian culture / civilization is not of interest to me.
            I was born there and lived for many years, part of me.
            1. +6
              28 May 2020 09: 35
              Quote: Maki Avellievich
              I no longer live in the Ukrainian SSR, but Russian culture / civilization is not of interest to me.

              Alas, the Ukrainian SSR is no longer there, something ugly has grown in its place, from which Russian culture / civilization , has yet to make the territory inhabited by sane people ...
              1. -2
                28 May 2020 09: 38
                Quote: Insurgent
                Alas, the Ukrainian SSR is no longer there, something ugly has grown up in its place, from which Russian culture / civilization has yet to make a territory populated by sane people ...

                let’s hope that the meeting between Russia and Ukraine will generate synergy.
                1. +3
                  28 May 2020 09: 59
                  Quote: Maki Avellevich
                  Quote: Insurgent
                  Alas, the Ukrainian SSR is no longer there, something ugly has grown up in its place, from which Russian culture / civilization has yet to make a territory populated by sane people ...

                  let’s hope that the meeting between Russia and Ukraine will generate synergy.

                  Well, this is unlikely, with the current authorities the independence and their Russophobia, there will be interaction and we will achieve - emergencies winked the wrong systems No.
                  py.sy. I do not minus anyone
                2. +6
                  28 May 2020 10: 04
                  Quote: Maki Avellievich
                  let's hope that the meeting between Russia and Ukraine will create synergy

                  Synergy involves the interaction of several powerful, healthy factors of the parties.

                  From the outskirts, I don’t see those request
                  1. -1
                    28 May 2020 10: 20
                    Quote: Insurgent
                    Synergy involves the interaction of several powerful, healthy factors of the parties.

                    "healthy" is not necessary.
                    1. +3
                      28 May 2020 10: 24
                      Quote: Maki Avellievich
                      "healthy" is not necessary

                      In this case, it is necessary, because not only the Donbass will not perceive the close interaction of the Russian center with Bandera scum, but the peoples of Russia will say their word ...
            2. +5
              28 May 2020 09: 57
              Quote: Maki Avellievich
              Your personal interests do not extend beyond your district center?

              Not quite so: if I see something bad in my native "regional center", then I do not leave it in order to find other "regional centers" and from there become interested in his life. Everyone has their own way, milky ...
          2. +1
            28 May 2020 09: 54
            Quote: Volodin
            Quote: Maki Avellievich
            So how to understand Russia?
            Tell me, my friend.

            Why do you need it? You have chosen a different country for yourself, as I understand it ...

            But many remained in business in Russia .. laughing
        2. +6
          28 May 2020 09: 28
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          In any way, arshins are also useless.
          So how to understand Russia?
          Tell me, my friend.

          The answer to your question is simple:
          "You can only believe in Russia."
          1. 0
            28 May 2020 09: 55
            Quote: ghby
            "You can only believe in Russia."

            Precisely, on this and stand! hi
    4. +2
      28 May 2020 08: 49
      Well, the Jews tried to take Syria abruptly as Libya, for example, however, it turned out to be much more difficult to hang Assad - therefore, the Israeli military slows down with a coup in Iran; while Pars gas is still with Ayatollah; and even the Turkmen murgab is still in the hands of the Turkmen, although the jackdaw was included in the drawn igil cards
    5. +2
      28 May 2020 08: 52
      They simply did not understand in Russia the "civilized component" of the so-called "Arab Spring"
      And the policy of Peter1 and his followers was to free the Christian, Orthodox powers (southern Europe, Transcaucasia) from the Turkish yoke. To drive the Turkish "trotter" into the stall. Well, Persia, in the future.
      The Middle East is to the popes and their Crusades. And later to the British and French.
    6. HAM
      +1
      28 May 2020 09: 02
      They even don't really know their short story (or pretend to be), but climb into someone else's with "corrections" ...
      "Understanders" ... you understand !!
    7. +1
      28 May 2020 09: 04
      The United States is intolerant of competitors ...
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. +4
      28 May 2020 09: 09
      To understand the role of Russia in the BV, it is necessary to evaluate and understand its imperial experience of forming its own state, not imperialistic, but imperial, not through subjugation and coercion, but through symbiosis, cooperation and sometimes patronage. No one in our country forbade living according to their own rules and praying to their gods; all were united by common interests. This approach is also used in Middle Eastern politics, it is not customary for us to put a gun to our heads and twist our arms, run and impose our values ​​as announced, we accept a partner in his originality. Sometimes this policy looks like a weak approach, but it is strategically more correct and designed for decades. Like it or not, our neighbors in Eurasia, take it off for us to live together, and do business, manage and get out of the ocean, this is not our method.
      1. -3
        28 May 2020 10: 05
        Look at the annexation of Siberia, Central Asia, the Caucasus and further down the list, we will not recall Novgorod under Ivan the Terrible, but the list goes on. So do not flatter yourself about non-violent accession, everything is like everyone else.
        1. +4
          28 May 2020 12: 28
          And no one says that we traveled everywhere with a loaf, saved someone from extermination, punished someone for aggression, but never let us go to pieces and let them go around the world, everywhere we tried to bring security and raise the standard of living, in serfdom besides the peasants of the central Russian provinces no one else was, by the way.
          1. 0
            28 May 2020 17: 01
            Read the text before my answer, there you wrote the exact opposite, as you understand the arrival of Yermak was not so peaceful for the local peoples, given the advantage in armament, and the organization of the troops, for example.
            1. +1
              28 May 2020 19: 40
              We take and compare Emaka and Cortes as the two most famous conquerors of thera incognita, I think the difference in approaches will immediately become clear. We have never exterminated the natives.
              1. 0
                28 May 2020 20: 22
                The Indians lost a lot from smallpox and other diseases brought by the Spaniards, there is no such information about Ermak, but as I understand it, in both cases the natives were not much worried
    10. -5
      28 May 2020 09: 23
      If praised in America, then we are doing everything wrong.
    11. +2
      28 May 2020 09: 31
      But there were no stripes then and they are still not capable of counting. fellow
    12. +2
      28 May 2020 09: 52
      Seminars like Pushkin and Perestroika were popular among Americans in the 90s)).
      Where there is no money, they are all quite superficial - like Peter cut a window to Europe, GDP to the Middle East fellow But it’s good that they are already analyzing.
      1. +2
        28 May 2020 13: 07
        Quote: Krasnodar
        superficially - like Peter cut a window to Europe, GDP to the Middle East

        Even if so, then the GDP was more likely to pluck the boards with which this window was boarded up after the departure of the USSR.
        Well and so, on trifles: loops smeared, latches corrected. It remains to wash and hang the curtains, but this is already in the course of a big tidy. Yes laughing
        Quote: Krasnodar
        well, that is already being analyzed.

        More often masturbate. wassat
        1. +4
          28 May 2020 13: 16
          Let's just say - even in 1983, Papa Assad refused to station Soviet troops in Syria on an ongoing basis, although without the USSR he would have lost much more than the Golan and Sheba's farm.
          As for the Americans, everything that does not concern the opportunity to make money is conducted at a very amateurish level, because engaged in this did not find themselves in something worthwhile, by American standards, business.
          1. +1
            28 May 2020 13: 19
            Quote: Krasnodar
            even in 1983, Papa Assad refused to station Soviet troops in Syria on an ongoing basis,

            That was superfluous. This refers to the Middle East policy of the country as a whole, and its influence in this region.
            Quote: Krasnodar
            everything that does not concern the opportunity to earn money is conducted at a very amateurish level,

            Yes, money doesn’t come out very well either - this is about analytics.
            1. +2
              28 May 2020 13: 54
              Superfluous, not superfluous - the USSR has long wanted to have bases in the Eastern Mediterranean.
              With grandmas? I will say for what I know - in oncology, many very successful topics are American. Well-organized data collection, pharmaceutical analytics (market requirements + purchasing power + optimization + investment in development) are generally standard. As well as the approval criteria for various medical antitumor (I don’t know about others) FDA drugs.
              1. +1
                28 May 2020 16: 20
                Quote: Krasnodar
                With grandmas? I will say for what I know - in oncology, many very successful topics are American. Well-organized data collection, pharmaceutical analytics (market requirements + purchasing power + optimization + investment in development) are generally standard. As well as the approval criteria for various medical antitumor (I don’t know about others) FDA drugs.

                It should be noted here that this work is done by specialists from all over the world working in the States, I am not only "local" ... And yes - let them move science - they do it superbly and are less involved in international politics ...
                1. +2
                  28 May 2020 17: 10
                  But for some reason, these experts are happy to move to the USA for permanent residence and work. If the values ​​like Stanley Fisher go to Israel out of national solidarity, no more, then people are in the States because of the excellent conditions for the work they are interested in and the large fees that Americans pay them with an eye to the even greater profit that the enticed specialists will bring to them.
                  As for international politics, there is no money there, so not the most “high-quality" representatives of American society are engaged in it.
                  1. +1
                    28 May 2020 17: 15
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    But for some reason, these experts are happy to move to the USA for permanent residence and work. If the values ​​like Stanley Fisher go to Israel out of national solidarity, no more, then people are in the States because of the excellent conditions for interesting work and the large fees that Americans pay them with an eye on even greater profits that will be brought to them by hacked specialists.

                    The fact is that the Americans are perfectly able to organize and arrange everything at home, therefore they go to them)) But how to do something outside, they often just do not know how and behave with the grace of an elephant in a china shop, which and sad consequences ...
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    As for international politics, there is no money there, so not the most “high-quality" representatives of American society are engaged in it.

                    Nevertheless, it is precisely aimed at acquiring this biggest money by expanding the spheres of influence ... But the point. rather, in some degradation of the American political elite, in many ways it becomes similar to the "politburo" of the late Soviet Union ...
                    1. +3
                      28 May 2020 17: 36
                      That's it - the fact that outsiders are engaged in outsiders of their society, starting with Carter and Nixon. If Bush’s father, a WWII veteran who received an excellent education, the offspring of a wealthy family, just pounded Saddam a quarter to put him in place, then his son was smart enough to create a Shiite triangle, without thinking twice, demolishing the army and the regime of the third world country. I’m silent about Afghanistan ...
                      As for degradation - the apogee was young Obama, Trump is at least something of himself, for example, “new money”))
                      1. 0
                        28 May 2020 19: 47
                        It's like that...
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        As for degradation - the apogee was young Obama, Trump is at least something of himself, for example, “new money”))

                        Trump is, rather, the last squeak, an attempt to improve the situation, but unsuccessful ...
                        But about the "young" Obama - "old" Biden may turn out to be much worse ...
                        1. +1
                          28 May 2020 20: 46
                          An attempt to rectify the situation is too loud in the US context. You can’t name them a degenerative country, and Trump’s rule has led to economic growth, which is unsuccessful. As for the general degradation of the level of American politicians, he wrote about this above. Successful people are interested in grandmothers, who are becoming less and less in politics, and constantly more in other areas of American life.
                        2. +1
                          28 May 2020 22: 18
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          An attempt to rectify the situation is too loud in the US context.

                          Well, they partially corrected it.
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          Yes, and Trump's board led to economic growth

                          Only partially ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          Successful people are interested in grandmothers, who are becoming less and less in politics, and constantly more in other areas of American life.

                          How to say - Biden is making big money in politics ... They still have a problem in their ossification - the old part of the elite got stuck in the Cold War, and the young in the 90s - the era of complete American domination ...
                        3. 0
                          28 May 2020 22: 27
                          And were the US in distress?
                          It’s like a little pregnant - economic growth - it is either there or not)),
                          What kind of money does Biden make in politics - from the Donbass oil slate that has not yet been extracted in the undeveloped territory during the collapse of energy prices? laughing
                          As for ... not that ossification, complete disagreement in foreign policy - I agree completely.
                        4. 0
                          29 May 2020 13: 47
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          And were the US in distress?

                          There was a negative trend in the economy, for the States, accustomed to living on just good, but very good - it's very bad ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          It’s like a little pregnant - economic growth - it is either there or not)),

                          The growth may be at 7% per year, as in China, or maybe in some countries at 0,5%, the difference, I think, is significant ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          What kind of money does Biden make in politics - from the Donbass oil slate that has not yet been extracted in the undeveloped territory during the collapse of energy prices?

                          Biden in Ukraine not only lit up on the slate ...
                          And the collapse of prices - so in any area there is such a risk ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          As for ... not that ossification, complete disagreement in foreign policy - I agree completely.

                          Well, disagreement comes from ossification - you can only act according to worked out scenarios based on pre-intricate assumptions, and the situation is already different ...
                        5. +1
                          29 May 2020 13: 55
                          I think the States will cope)))
                          Percentage - in Japan, stagnation is generally zero - but they feel very good
                          Well, what else can the Biden in Ukraine do? Trade Ukrainian weapons? Agricultural?
                        6. 0
                          29 May 2020 13: 59
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          I think the States will cope)))
                          Percentage - in Japan, stagnation is generally zero - but they feel very good

                          There is such a thing as inertia of economic development ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          Well, what else can the Biden in Ukraine do? Trade Ukrainian weapons? Agricultural?

                          They can sit there on the cabin, in fact, and crouched, earning a good income from this. In general, politicians in the United States are very well tied to capital - mines, they all turn out to be large shareholders in all kinds of campaigns ...
                        7. +1
                          29 May 2020 14: 03
                          In the inside, yes. In the external - to a much lesser extent
                          Inertia of economic development - open in Swaziland a large factory for the production of cardboard bags for .... say coffee - there will be an economic growth of 200%.
                        8. +1
                          29 May 2020 14: 09
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          In the inside, yes. In the external - to a much lesser extent

                          And in the outside, apparently, too ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          Inertia of economic development - open in Swaziland a large factory for the production of cardboard bags for .... say coffee - there will be an economic growth of 200%.

                          This is in Swaziland, where the cost of slave strength will be 3 kopecks per heel, and in the states where the worker needs to be provided to everyone and a little more from above? That's just it, it turns out that the factories are leaving for Swaziland, providing there the economic growth of 100500% there, because it is simply profitable, and the same States still have to inflate financial bubbles, because in high-tech production you will not occupy a significant share of the working population ... And a lot of high-tech things are also leaving for Asia ...
                          But I also hope that the States will nevertheless be removed in the long run, because if they go down, then we will inevitably too ...
                        9. +1
                          29 May 2020 14: 14
                          As for the external - I have no data.
                          In the United States, before the pandemic, the economy was booming - what will happen now is unknown. An example of Swaziland is a measure of economic growth.
                        10. +1
                          29 May 2020 14: 29
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          In the United States, before the pandemic, the economy was booming - what will happen now is unknown

                          This is not only for the States, it is for the whole world ...
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          An example of Swaziland is a measure of economic growth.

                          It is also necessary to take into account the specifics - what is the standard of living and consumption in Swaziland, social guarantees, etc., and what is in the States, so the rate of economic growth will have very different meanings ...
                        11. +1
                          29 May 2020 15: 12
                          That's exactly the last thing I wanted to say hi
                          7% of Chinese and 0.5% of the state are also two big differences)).
                        12. +1
                          29 May 2020 15: 26
                          Namely, but there is a big BUT - in China there is one level of consumption and life, and in the USA it is completely different ...
                        13. +1
                          29 May 2020 15: 33
                          I agree - but Trump is praised for the fact that life has become a little cheaper and there has been more work. So - growth. Was laughing
                        14. +1
                          29 May 2020 15: 34
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          I agree - but Trump is praised for the fact that life has become a little cheaper and there has been more work. So - growth. Was

                          Namely, while others scold for circumcision freebies ... There are simply different layers of the population - who wants to work and who wants to live on benefits ...
                          The fact that growth was unequivocal, but whether it was what Trump wanted was a big question ...
                        15. +1
                          29 May 2020 15: 37
                          Here! Who did the Amer communicate with, both those born and those who moved in well? Jews, Armenians, Russians (well, Russian Israelis with Russian Armenians laughing) - they all drive on lovers of freebies whom they feed with their taxes.
                        16. +1
                          30 May 2020 01: 01
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          Here! With whom he talked from the amers, both the nee and well-settled migrants - Jews, Armenians, Russians (well, Russian Israelis with Russian Armenians) - they all persecute lovers who they feed with their taxes.

                          Exactly! The Germans. By the way, the situation is almost worse ...
                        17. +2
                          30 May 2020 01: 04
                          Well yes, but these have long held alternatively gifted
    13. +1
      28 May 2020 10: 06
      Robert Rabil
      This American even justifies the title of analyst, because able to read and analyze historical facts transferring them to date. It correctly makes it clear that American policy on the BV using its slogans and desires, without taking into account reality and Russia, is unpromising. But apparently smart people in American foreign policy are not at odds, and their thoughts will not be heard.
    14. +1
      28 May 2020 10: 15
      Rabil wanted to say something interesting and deep. It is a pity that the meaning is lost along the way. feel
    15. 0
      28 May 2020 10: 34
      Russia uses military power, proxies, and misinformation to expand its influence.
      Doesn't the US use them? Well, a bunch of bobos. Well, how are your results?
      However, it is completely wrong to limit Russian politics to the aforementioned dubious foreign policy instruments.
      But Russia has a secret weapon, its history, which no one in the West knows. feel
      According to Rabil, it would be worthwhile to evaluate the history of Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of Russia's victory over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty." The role that disappeared after the collapse of the Soviet Union once again turned into a vengeful tone under Putin,
      "Horses mixed in a heap, people." Analysis of the history of Russia from Peter I to Putin - and no one else saw them. recourse feelThe USA is gone. I agree, they need to be offered to dig from Ivan the Great.
    16. -3
      28 May 2020 11: 29
      Analyst in the USA: To understand the role of Russia in the Middle East, one needs to evaluate its history since the time of Peter I

      Analysts damn .. negative Forgot that the USA, the first in the world recognized by the Russian Empire! And it was a serious recognition and a political step!
      Right now we are suffering from their "gratitude", etc.
      Don’t do good, you won’t get evil .. How many times has Russia already come across this rake in its thousand-year history ..?
    17. +1
      28 May 2020 11: 33
      empire is that state of Russia, which has established itself as a historical relay race, which was passed down to future generations by generations of ancestors not as an ethnographic exhibit, tradition or custom. This baton of the imperial state of the Russian state to the generation of ancestors was passed from generation to generation as the only possible model of the Russian state for centuries to exist. it
      and there is the experience of the people how to save Russia for an eternity going perspective beyond the horizon of history. And the current generation should be grateful to the generations of their ancestors, who are the foremost relay race
      they pointed out what awaits the heirs of the Empire beyond the horizon of the future history of Russia, if these future generations want to live in the Russian state and continue the history of Russia. Beyond the horizon of history, future generations are waiting only for the Imperial government of Russia. There were three Empires in Russia. Tsarist times of Ivan the Terrible, Imperial times of the Romanovs and the Red Empire of the USSR. But Putin is from the cohort of the Yeltsin and Sobchakov gang, which made every effort to bring about the Time of Troubles in Russia again. And since Putin has so far only said that the destruction of the USSR was a catastrophe, but does not take any efforts to rectify the consequences of this catastrophe, allows any Yeltsin centers to function in Russia, has not brought to account the destroyer Gorbachev, etc., it’s obvious that the Empire will be restored by the ruler of Russia
      after Putin. Although there is hope that Putin in the subconscious mind understands the need to restore the Empire within the borders of 1989. Therefore, Crimea reunited with Russia. Maybe Putin is cooking,
      so that it would be easier for the ruler after Putin to restore what destroyed the cohort of Yeltsinists and Sobchaks, to which Putin himself belonged. After all, Putin is so ardent to be baptized in the Church, but how
      It is known that the Imperial path and the Imperial state of the Russian state is definitely God, because the Church and the Orthodox Faith were one of those Atlanteans who on their shoulders held the statehood of the Russian Empire. So there is a reason to repent to Putin before God, and as the ruler of Russia, one must also atone for sins before Russia for all this Yeltsin and Sobchakov’s gang. Will the revived Empire have its special influence and special significance in Syria, and what status of Syria will be in relation to Russia, this should be decided by the rulers of the future Russian Empire, and not the Americans, whom none of the Syrian invited to Syria. And Russia, in order to save Syria, was invited by the Syrian state and the Syrian government. Can Syria, if today's Russian Federation is revived into the Russian Empire, be asked to be a part of this Empire to protect it from the destruction of its people, since once Georgia and Ukraine were asked for the same purpose from the Romanov Russian Empire? An answer to this question can only be given to the ruler of Russia who understands why and why the ancestors united their lands around the Moscow Principality and
      then it was not a big principality that was expanded to the large state of Tsarist Russia and further to the gigantic and powerful state of the Russian Empire.
    18. -6
      28 May 2020 12: 14
      Absolutely spit on Assad and Syria. let it fail at least.
    19. +2
      28 May 2020 12: 27
      Quote: Maki Avellevich

      let’s hope that the meeting between Russia and Ukraine will generate synergy.

      Why should Russia feed the poor, scabbly lads mired in chronic debt? All this has already passed.
    20. 0
      28 May 2020 13: 15
      Quote: Bar1
      According to Rabil, it would be worthwhile to evaluate the history of Russia "since the time of Peter the Great and through the prism of Russia's victory over the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the Kuchuk-Karnaydzhi peace treaty."


      in general, the Kuchukkarnadzhi world was concluded at the time of E2 and Peter has nothing to do with it. This slave / Rabil is bad with history, one word is pin_day.

      Maybe it has nothing to do with it, just the period of what is happening, named as "... since the time of Peter the Great ..." ("since the times" - this, in Russian, is the beginning of the considered temporary section, which coincides with the beginning of the period of Peter's reign ... .), in other words, everything that happened later is also included in the period under discussion.
      An American speaks Russian, better than many of our respondents :-)

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"