FOM President: how Putin will enter history books


The newspaper Izvestia published an interview with the president of the Public Opinion Foundation (Public Opinion Foundation) Alexander Oslon. The interview touched on numerous issues, including one that related to the time in power of Vladimir Putin. Alexander Oslon also spoke about the most popular politicians of our time.


According to him, the most popular politicians among citizens of the Russian Federation (in addition to President Vladimir Putin) are LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, current cabinet chairman Mikhail Mishustin, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Alexander Oslon, characterizing the main "parameters" of the "Putin era", notes that they depend on a specific period of time. According to the president of the FOM, if we talk about the zero years (2000s), then this is a remission, if it’s about the 10s (2010s), then this is a defense capability.

Oslon believes that this is what will go into the textbooks stories in the paragraph on the time during which the country is led by Vladimir Putin. And also in the textbook “they will reflect the victory over the coronavirus”. There, according to the head of the POF, the theme of reunification with Crimea and the revival of the concept of “we” will be included.

It was such a question (about what will go into this paragraph) that was asked by the journalist "Izvestia").

With some theses, Alexander Oslon is already arguing on the net. In particular, doubts are expressed that the civil “we” against the background of what is happening in the country have truly strengthened in citizens. The main reason for this kind of doubt is the continued socio-economic differentiation and a new challenge - distance from each other.
Photos used:
Russian President's website
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

173 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ros 56 28 May 2020 06: 28 New
    • 29
    • 5
    +24
    It is necessary to write the truth and only the truth. Then it will be - history, but in another way, it is called - fiction and as a result we will get a transcription of history.
    1. Reserve buildbat 28 May 2020 06: 48 New
      • 45
      • 14
      +31
      In history, the truth has never been written. All these Nestors, Karamzins, etc. composed history for the sake of modern power. And now the same thing.
      1. Insurgent 28 May 2020 06: 58 New
        • 33
        • 8
        +25
        FOM President: how Putin will enter history books


        Quote: stock buildbat
        In history, the truth has never been written. All these Nestors, Karamzins, etc. composed history for the sake of modern power. And now the same thing.


        Empress All-Russian Empress Catherine II went down in history as the Great, while rejecting the proposal to be so called from the Legislative Commission convened by her in 1767, and designed to put things in order in the empire, but for a number of reasons that did not justify the hopes placed on her.

        Catherine considered this proposal and explained the following:

        1. To consider it great or not - this will need to be decided by posterity. For neither she herself nor her contemporaries have the right to do this.

        2. Catherine still wanted to be called "Wise." But even here the queen modestly remarked that only the Lord God is wise. And she is just a ruler who loves her people and whose task is to take care of public affairs.


        1. Crowe 28 May 2020 07: 09 New
          • 48
          • 1
          +47
          In honor of the Victory of the Soviet people over fascist Germany, it was decided to erect a sculptural ensemble - a monument in the Treptow Park in Berlin. The leader was approved by the sculptor Vuchetich (he went to war as a volunteer, and graduated from the battalion commander). Vuchetich said that K. Voroshilov recommended that he create an ensemble - a full-length Stalin monument with the image of Europe or the globe in his hands. Two sketches were made. Stalin chose the figure of a soldier with a child in her arms.
          1. kjhg 28 May 2020 08: 50 New
            • 49
            • 22
            +27
            Quote: Crowe
            Two sketches were made. Stalin chose the figure of a soldier with a child in her arms.

            No wonder he was called the father of the nation during his lifetime.
            And descendants will write the truth about Putin as a petty, worthless, hypocritical protege of big capital. Here the clergyman in the sixth generation said bluntly
            1. Stas157 28 May 2020 09: 32 New
              • 32
              • 20
              +12
              FOM President: how Putin will enter history books

              Of course it will. The only question is in what quality! But it’s far from what the court slabs draw to him, designed to compose the modern history of oligarchic Russia.

              The hypocritical cunning man, a generator of half-hearted decisions and a conservative of transformations begun by Yeltsin. Putin is a substitute for Yeltsin and his entourage. And they did not fail with him!
              1. Alex777 28 May 2020 10: 59 New
                • 14
                • 23
                -9
                Yes, there is no prophet in his Fatherland ...
                Peppy writers who freely express their thoughts will appreciate this freedom only when the next ruler (God forbid) sends “people's money” for such a post for 5 years to multiply by free labor.
                But it will be too late ...
                1. Alex777 28 May 2020 11: 23 New
                  • 9
                  • 18
                  -9
                  You can minus. You can turn on your head. bully
                  1. Alex777 29 May 2020 09: 52 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Start trumping down! bully
                    Trump signed a decree on the regulation of social networks

                    https://www.interfax.ru/world/710803
                    I didn’t even have to wait long ... laughing
                2. iouris 29 May 2020 12: 09 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Alex777
                  Yes, there is no prophet in his Fatherland ...

                  Just with the fatherland, everything is in order: some prophets.
                  He defended his thesis "Development, research and application of algorithms for constructing integral indicators of the functioning of complex systems" for the degree of candidate of technical sciences in 1984 at the Institute of Management Problems (Moscow).
                  In 1996, the Public Opinion Foundation became the basic sociological organization of B.N. Yeltsin in the presidential election. Oslon was then part of the well-known Analytical Group.
                  Born in the city of Zlatoust, Chelyabinsk region, in a family of electrical engineers. Parents hail from Ukraine, graduated from the Moscow Power Engineering Institute in the 1950s, and left for Israel in the mid-1990s.
                  And how many times has been awarded!
                  1. Alex777 29 May 2020 13: 35 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    So I didn’t mean Oslo as a prophet? Never! laughing
                    And the author to whom I answered was also not writing about Oslon.
              2. Trotil42 29 May 2020 11: 36 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                It will go down not only in history textbooks, but also in the Guinness book.... as the only ruler who was able to reset history ... who, as a result of a time reform, was able to abolish time zones in Russia..totry was able to double GDP growth by firing the head of ROSSTAT ...
                1. Alex777 29 May 2020 13: 37 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Yes Yes Yes. Pioneer enthusiasm prevented checking the facts before setting out. bully
                  Belts change this to Medvedev.
                  1. Trotil42 29 May 2020 15: 04 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Check .... the last one who was sausage under the law on time was Putin, in 2014 amended the law ... it seems Magadan jumped for two hours ...
                    1. Alex777 29 May 2020 15: 11 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Sergei! As far as I remember, this was a correction of Medvedev’s deeds at the request of the places. Especially not advertised. hi
                      https://vlg.aif.ru/infographic/chasovye_poyasa_v_rossii_infografika
                      https://ndn.info/novosti/10730-putin-podpisal-zakon-smenit-chasovoj-poyas-v-novosibirske
                      1. Trotil42 29 May 2020 16: 08 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Alexander .. he expressed his tacit consent to Medvedev’s actions .. he didn’t understand the elementary laws of nature, he couldn’t .. It’s wildness when a part of the country wakes up two hours later or earlier ... Everything was done with his approval ...
                      2. Alex777 29 May 2020 17: 19 New
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        -1
                        I know for sure that not everything is not approved.
                        As I know, what Medvedev was removed for.
                        That's just too early to tell. hi
        2. Ros 56 28 May 2020 09: 20 New
          • 20
          • 6
          +14
          One more confirmation that our homegrown liberalists and especially foreigners simply lie about Stalin.
          1. Alex777 28 May 2020 11: 13 New
            • 4
            • 17
            -13
            What, there are no living relatives to tell: how was it under Stalin?
            I have, thank God. And I do not need to speculate who is lying there and who is not.
          2. Marconi41 28 May 2020 11: 43 New
            • 15
            • 10
            +5
            Quote: Ros 56
            One more confirmation that our homegrown liberalists and especially foreigners simply lie about Stalin.

            The role in the history of Stalin is not unambiguous. On the one hand, repression, on the other, economic growth and victory in the Second World War. So it will be with Putin. The bad will be forgotten over time, and the Caucasus and Crimea will remain part of the country. All this will be decided by descendants, not WE.
            1. Alex777 28 May 2020 13: 26 New
              • 4
              • 12
              -8
              One cannot disagree with you. hi
            2. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 26 New
              • 3
              • 10
              -7
              And this is correct, and we cannot change it, because we cannot.
            3. AA17 28 May 2020 19: 35 New
              • 9
              • 3
              +6
              Dear, Marconi41 (Andrey). "The bad will be forgotten over time ..." is your phrase. It depends on what is considered bad and what is a disaster. To date, officially until the end of the era of Putin, another 4 years. But it’s already possible to sum up some results. For me, the era of Putin is the fixation of the final destruction of the Independent Social State for most citizens. Continued redistribution of public property with subsequent transfer to private individuals. The creation of the New Dependent (bourgeois, corporate, raw material - could not find a capacious definition) State with favorable enrichment conditions for a small part of the population.
              "... In Russia, one of the highest concentrations of wealth - 1% of the population controls almost 60% of the country's total wealth. This is more than the world average. Moreover, since 2008, the share of wealth in the hands of 1% of the richest Russians has grown by 13 %. ...
              In Russia, they counted 246 thousand dollar millionaires by the end of 2019. Moreover, in 2010 there were only 14 thousand, that is, their number in the country increased 17 times over the past decade .... "https://vc.ru/finance/102286-kolichestvo-dollarovyh-millionerov-v-rossii -vyroslo-v-17-raz-za-10-let
              1. Marconi41 29 May 2020 09: 15 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: AA17
                For me, the era of Putin is the fixation of the final destruction of the Independent Social State

                The main phrase "For You" and not a few people will agree with you. But there will be those for whom the surname Putin is associated with the country's exit from the crisis of the 90s. However, it will be neither the one nor the other who decide the role of Putin in history. Descendants will appreciate from their point of view.
              2. Alex777 29 May 2020 11: 05 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                The era of Putin is the fixation of the final destruction of the Independent Social State for most citizens.

                Respected AA17 (Alexander Anatolyevich)!
                Alas, there has never been an independent social state.
                Pensioners vote for Putin for a simple reason - with him, pensions are paid on time. What happened to them at EBN you already forgot?
                In the late USSR, where there were no Stalinist repressions, products could be bought in cities of the 1st supply category: Moscow, Kislovodsk, Sochi and the like. Of course, even in closed areas.
                Underground and not very millionaires in the USSR have existed since the time of Ostap Bender. wink
                And the princes, and khans, and bais lived well. It’s just that they, in the national republics, became party and Soviet leaders.
                Or is polygamy in Soviet times a big secret for someone?
                It is useless to state all causes and circumstances in a short post.
                You are apparently an atheist by conviction. That would explain a lot.
                In today's situation, I am pleased that our leader is an intelligent, efficient and not bloodthirsty person.
                He has no other leaders for you, except for those whom he uses.
                Although I personally hate Gref, Chubais, Medvedev, Prokhorov, Shuvalov, and further on the list.
                But the last thing we need now is inner turmoil.
                At least believe me, at least check, but in 2012 one era ended and another began. The world that we knew will never be again.
                Everything that is happening in the world only confirms the thesis.
                It is impossible to return to youth and the USSR.
                And what the new world will be like depends on all of us. From whether we have "WE" hi
                1. Alex777 29 May 2020 11: 23 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  And the last.
                  I am sure that Russia has exceeded the plan for revolutions.
                  Our "foreign partners" are sleeping and seeing how to divide us according to some sign.
                  At least national, at least property, at least religion. There are enough examples. Ukraine is one big example of what happens if the plans of "foreign partners" begin to come true.
                  All the shortcomings you listed are present there in a hypertrophied form.
                  And they have no hope. Unlike us. hi
      2. Shurik70 28 May 2020 07: 09 New
        • 34
        • 3
        +31
        But who is this "FOM president"?
        Descendants will judge without his opinion.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 11 New
        • 38
        • 10
        +28
        "I am ashamed gentlemen in our century enlightened from smallpox to die!" - The Empress's words on the death of Louis XV. This is the end of the 18th century! these are the words of the first monarch in the world who has vaccinated smallpox! Which not only instilled in itself, but also founded smallpox houses (analogous to FAP) throughout Russia!
        She was surrounded by: Suvorov, Lomonosov, Nakhimov, Potemkin - all from the lower classes, who became Elite thanks to talents. How can you compare the scale of the personalities of Catherine, Stalin and Putin ??? Catherine is the era of breakthroughs and Putin is a protege of the oligarchy powerless against the coronavirus. Although he has at his disposal the Soviet NGO Vector, for which creating a specific immunoglobulin is a matter of a couple of months.
        1. Insurgent 28 May 2020 08: 23 New
          • 13
          • 3
          +10
          Quote: aybolyt678
          She was surrounded by: Suvorov, Lomonosov, Nakhimov, Potemkin - all from the lower classes, who became Elite thanks to talents.

          Well, let’s put it from the bottom, and even that, not from the “most-most” ones, only MV Lomonosov, but Nakhimov, who is generally from a different tale ...

          In addition, your mistakes do not refute the fact of the empress’s ability to distinguish from the mass of others? capable, active, extraordinary people ...
          1. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 40 New
            • 9
            • 2
            +7
            Quote: Insurgent
            Nakhimov, that one from another tale

            Thank you smile Mentioned - Ushakov!
          2. Stirbjorn 28 May 2020 10: 33 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            Quote: Insurgent
            Well, let’s put from the bottom, and even then, not from the “most-most” only MV Lomonosov

            And even then, under Catherine, he lived only 2.5 years out of 53 lived
            1. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 22: 58 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              THX! but she really corresponded with Voltaire! and founded orphanages, in general, has done extraordinarily much for Russia! I found one defect - I did not consider peasants as people, which for that time was usually
              1. Stirbjorn 29 May 2020 09: 19 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Quote: aybolyt678
                I found one defect - I did not consider peasants as people, which for that time was usually
                Then remember the Pugachev Peasant War, of which there were only two in Russia. Then there was the overthrow of the rightful sovereign Peter III, and in the Seven Years War Catherine was a spy in favor of Frederick the Great, that is, treason in its purest form. And so, the noblemen lived well and carefree with her, the embezzlement flourished .... extremely dubious ruler in the history of Russiahi
                1. aybolyt678 29 May 2020 11: 13 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Stirbjorn
                  extremely dubious ruler in the history of Russia

                  you are a victim of an information war. smile Ekaterina is victory, this is rise at 5 in the morning, and checking the palace, this is real work, the introduction of paper money in Russia !! Crimea! Victory over smallpox, plague, the creation of schools, orphanages for children ... Well, yes, the privileges of the nobility are excessive, spoiled the favorites, I agree
                  1. Stirbjorn 29 May 2020 11: 31 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    you are a victim of an information war.

                    who with whom ?! Pugachev sent the Anglo-Saxons ?! Pikul wrote about espionage in favor of Frederick, including in The Feather and the Sword. By the way, about the rise at 5 in the morning, who is this ?! You would more specifically describe her merits, and then some slogans
                    1. aybolyt678 29 May 2020 11: 50 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      + + +
                      Quote: Stirbjorn
                      About spying in favor of Frederick at Pikul written

                      at Pikul in Favorit, Catherine's day was described exactly, how she woke a sleepy palace in the morning, she went to bed early and got up very early. She was a graphomaniac, wrote letters herself. Different Pugachevs were among all the rulers. Egg Cossacks, as it is not much peasants. And then, all the same, a language barrier, many actions not from life experience, but on the advice, at first she was very young.
                      But your thought is that the Anglo-Saxons sent Pugachev - sooooo interesting! ++++
                    2. Alex777 29 May 2020 13: 40 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Pikul wrote beautifully. Like.
                      But under Catherine he was not there. hi
    2. Alexey from Perm 29 May 2020 20: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      here licked so licked as soon as the mouth did not break
  2. Ros 56 28 May 2020 07: 00 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    You misinterpret the concept of history.
    1. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 13 New
      • 10
      • 4
      +6
      Quote: Ros 56
      You misinterpret the concept of history.

      in fact true. The current interpretation of this sin
    2. knn54 28 May 2020 08: 25 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      "History is the nail on which I hang my picture"
      A. Dumas.
  3. AUL
    AUL 28 May 2020 07: 39 New
    • 23
    • 9
    +14
    Quote: stock buildbat
    In history, the truth has never been written.

    No matter what will write in textbooks about the current guarantor. Remember that will be different!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Tochilka 28 May 2020 09: 06 New
      • 22
      • 5
      +17
      Yes sir! list of winged phrases of Putin V.V. in a separate paragraph. The paragraph devoted to the period of the first quarter of the 21st century will be called “Getting up from your knees and there is no time for swinging”.
      Well, by analogy, the section of the economy is “Socially Responsible Effective Managers”.
      And about the capital and its head, "Virologist curb"
      ps sarcasm if someone did not understand
    3. New Year day 28 May 2020 23: 56 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: AUL
      Remember that will be different!

  4. Polite Moose 28 May 2020 07: 53 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    Quote: stock buildbat
    In history, the truth has never been written. All these Nestors, Karamzins, etc. composed history for the sake of modern power. And now the same thing.

    Support. hi Only eyewitnesses can tell the truth. And then - before death. And that is not all. And the bibliographers, they’ll write what they need. At least in the textbook, even in the constitution. Therefore, as I believe, it makes no sense to try now to evaluate the future color and scale of Putin’s figure in textbooks. Depending on the publication, it will change if it does not fall under compulsory oblivion. Or maybe churches in his honor will be erected. HZ, HZ.
    1. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 14 New
      • 14
      • 6
      +8
      Quote: Polite Moose
      Or maybe churches in his honor will be erected. HZ, HZ.

      something like the Yeltsin Center will be !!!!
    2. Piramidon 28 May 2020 10: 22 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Polite Moose
      Or maybe churches in his honor will be erected. HZ, HZ.

      Yeah, they’ll put it in the Mausoleum, it’s “double sleeping”.
  5. Olgovich 28 May 2020 10: 00 New
    • 4
    • 11
    -7
    Quote: stock buildbat
    In history never wrote the truth. All these Nestors, Karamzins, etc. composed history for the sake of modern power.

    To claim Karamzin’s “untruth”, one must know the truth.

    How do you know her? From Fomenko? Sokolova? recourse
    1. Reserve buildbat 28 May 2020 15: 29 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Karamzin himself wrote that his "History ..." is an artistic work. By the way, who are Fomenko and Sokolov that you mentioned? As a person who graduated from the history department of the Ural State University in 2000, I don’t know such scientists.
      1. Olgovich 28 May 2020 15: 54 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        Quote: stock buildbat
        Karamzin himself wrote that his "History ..." is an artistic work.

        1. You did not answer a simple question:
        Ч
        in order to assert Karamzin’s "untruth", one must know the truth for sure.

        How do you know her?
        question


        2. He did not say that.

        The fusion of HISTORICAL SCIENCE with the artistry of the IMAGES is another.
  • samarin1969 28 May 2020 07: 07 New
    • 16
    • 2
    +14
    Quote: Ros 56
    It is necessary to write the truth and only the truth.

    I would like to ... But the author predicts a "story for the younger." There is no such country, and there are no such textbooks where they write the truth. The historical truth is almost uncomfortable for almost everyone.
  • Civil 28 May 2020 07: 24 New
    • 13
    • 11
    +2
    There will be classics, the next Tsar of Russia, as it should be, will accuse “damned Putinism” of all problems, then he will also promise, distribute everything to friends and also steer to death. There is no other way on 1/7 land, and exceptions only confirm the rules
    1. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 18 New
      • 11
      • 8
      +3
      Quote: Civil
      the next Tsar of Russia, as expected in all problems, will accuse "damned Putinism"

      they are in fashion continuity. Announces tradition, opens the Putin Center, calls for building a strong Russia ... to protect the oligarchs smile
      1. New Year day 28 May 2020 23: 55 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: aybolyt678
        Announce tradition, open Putin Center ...

        will publish the complete works
        laughing
  • Svarog 28 May 2020 08: 32 New
    • 22
    • 7
    +15
    Quote: Ros 56
    It is necessary to write the truth and only the truth.

    Everyone has their own truth .. Everything will depend on who will be the next president .. that truth will be .. Yeltsin is trying to rehabilitate in Yekaterinburg ..
  • Atlant-1164 28 May 2020 09: 09 New
    • 18
    • 2
    +16
    History as a textbook generally needs to be removed from school education. leave a book with the title "Myths and Stories of Modern Russia".
  • Doccor18 28 May 2020 11: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It is necessary to write the truth and only the truth. Then it will be - history, but in another way, it is called - fiction and as a result we will get a transcription of history.

    If you write the truth, then this is a politically incorrect textbook, because the person is still in power.
    1. aybolyt678 29 May 2020 07: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Doccor18
      If you write the truth

      truth is just an interpretation of known facts .... How to find the Truth?
      1. Doccor18 29 May 2020 07: 17 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Oh, I assure you, and the truth will not wait long. But truth can only be dreamed of.
      2. Doccor18 29 May 2020 07: 17 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Oh, I assure you, and the truth will not wait long. But truth can only be dreamed of.
  • Alexander Sosnitsky 28 May 2020 15: 33 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    The problem is that no one understands anything. So much for the truth. Even if you record everything on a VCR, you won’t find the truth. The truth is in the right analytics, and no one can do it. Only countries that have lived thousands of years without war on their territory can slowly comprehend it. What is your truth if you are standing under the barrel? Just how do you survive. Now, this very second, and not through millennial generations. The right ones perish first, and if the bloo survived, then it will only eat and shred. That is all modern philosophy. This is used by the cunning of this world.
  • Vladimir_2U 28 May 2020 06: 31 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The main reason for this kind of doubt is the continued socio-economic differentiation and a new challenge - distance from each other.
    Strange, to blame on one social problem and the medical method. And distancing really helps, and differentiation hurts.
  • Crowe 28 May 2020 06: 31 New
    • 40
    • 5
    +35
    I’m embarrassed to ask when Mishustin managed to become popular?
    About nationalization. Answer: "I am against nationalization."
    About a progressive taxation scale. The answer: no one to take the increased income tax rate "
    Crimea, yes, I agree, it is possible and necessary to enter in the textbook.
    1. Gardamir 28 May 2020 06: 55 New
      • 33
      • 13
      +20
      Crimea, yes, I agree, you can and should be entered in the textbook
      as well as gifts to the Norwegians, Chinese, Azerbaijanis, ...
      1. depressant 28 May 2020 07: 20 New
        • 16
        • 4
        +12
        Gardamir, I am not able to appreciate what they write in history textbooks. What the ruler who comes after Putin will need will be written. I can only evaluate the current political moment. And he is extremely interesting. I suppose we all need to do this.
        1. populist 28 May 2020 08: 36 New
          • 25
          • 8
          +17
          depressant (lyudmila yakovlevna kuznetsova) I can only evaluate the current political moment.

          There is only one conclusion on the current political moment.
          The authorities are not able to develop the country, request
          and folk remedies are squandered. negative
          And he is extremely interesting

          In my opinion he is terrible. am No prospects. crying
  • Ryaruav 28 May 2020 06: 32 New
    • 17
    • 9
    +8
    Well, stick his figure to the monument of the millennium of Russia, everything goes to this
    1. Andrea 28 May 2020 06: 47 New
      • 15
      • 17
      -2
      It comes to the fact that he deserves a separate monument, and he will surely be.
      1. Gardamir 28 May 2020 06: 54 New
        • 23
        • 16
        +7
        deserves a separate monument
        like Gorbachev.
  • Deniska999 28 May 2020 06: 37 New
    • 21
    • 15
    +6
    Especially worth mentioning is the "bunker period" of the reign)
    1. depressant 28 May 2020 07: 52 New
      • 5
      • 10
      -5
      Deniska 999, with this I would be extremely careful. As practice has shown, the recovery process after coronavirus disease in many cases takes a long time. And now, imagine that the president fell ill, and the country fell into the hands of our predatory bureaucracy, local political kings, all kinds of rich thieves with their immense number of guards, many of whom have combat experience, as well as some dissatisfied military candidates who have already shown themselves to be throne. If there hadn’t been a coup, then the frond against Putin’s absolutism in the absence of formal rights to absolutism, nevertheless taking place, could have gained serious momentum and shaken the fragile balance in which our country found itself. Yes, Putin created the listed internal negativity. But at the dangerous moment of coronavirus rubbing between countries, the president must be healthy, and I approved of the fact that he was in the “bunker”. To lose the president at a dangerous moment is dangerous! I was only offended by his yellow spacesuit as a symbol of his idea of ​​the level of the collective mind of the population-- otherwise they would not have understood about the "bunker".
      1. Uncle lee 28 May 2020 08: 31 New
        • 13
        • 4
        +9
        Quote: depressant
        predatory bureaucracy, local political kings, all kinds of rich thieves

        And this layer formed immediately, as he went into the bunker?
        1. depressant 28 May 2020 09: 00 New
          • 10
          • 7
          +3
          A colleague, I think your question is bitter humor. Not a layer - whole hordes of villains have been called upon by Putin, since 2000, to create the vertical of power and the colonial economy in a formally independent country. Called for. Nurtured. Now reaping. The villains, they are the villains. They don’t know the feeling of gratitude, by definition they are not disposed to honest service to the country. To fidelity to the owner - too.
          Yesterday, during the discussion of the Ignatieff phenomenon, the word "frond" was mentioned. Putin not only deserved it, but also received it.
          1. Uncle lee 28 May 2020 09: 05 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: depressant
            bitter humor

            Very bitter, bitterly bitter .....
      2. Yngvar 28 May 2020 11: 55 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Dear Depressant!
        Maybe the president is hiding from his “friends” in the bunker? God forbid they’ll strangle you in your arms ...
        Well, the "yellow spacesuit" ... Very reminiscent of the film "Kin-dza-dza" about "differentiation of the population by color ... yellow pants"!
        1. depressant 28 May 2020 13: 43 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Yngvar, in my opinion, you are not far from the truth. In the name of stability, Putin only gently persuaded the oligarchs to invest in Russia for 20 years, and officials not to steal. Western hereditary capital has a high degree of snobbery, and our oligarchs, contrary to their hopes, aren’t let into the stables, they were not allowed into the stable. And they endured in the hope that maybe someday ... And now they are starting to take this our predatory flock in the West for their gills - "Where did you get it? Show me the documents!" And now, in horror, they begin to accumulate in Russia and gradually transfer stolen here - in that Russia, which their children scornfully call "rashka". And officials of all stripes and ranks, which suddenly suddenly began to grab and plant law enforcement for non-execution and theft, swept like rats. And you will not believe it - both the oligarchs and their ranks, who justify them, justify the depravity of their actions by the fact that they cannot consider Russia their country. Like, she doesn’t belong to us, because we are so unpatriotic. They say that the share of state property is too large in everything. The state brazenly breaks into the affairs of companies. And then Medvedev (!!!) gives them a New Year's gift ...
          On December 31, 2019, an Order of the Government of the Russian Federation was adopted
          N3260-r "On approval of the forecast plan for the privatization of federal property for 2020 - 2022"
          Within 2 years it will be privatized, which means it will either go bankrupt or reprofile everything that might come to your mind. The list is huge. Already the oligarchs are shaking hands from greed. They don’t want to give anything to Putin’s “family”, urging the purchased officials to disobedience, starting with the oligarch Sobyanin and ending with the miserable Ignatyev, to bring confusion to the Kremlin and bargain on their own terms. From here came the frond, which had not existed before. Officials who had not previously dared to tear their eyes off the floor when they planted such specimens as Khoroshavin now found a voice and jumped into power in the hope that they too would get a lot if the government waned from attacks. And already wishing wishing to keep up with the sale from abroad. One hundred rich people have issued a memorandum like "We'll be back if we are not arrested on arrival." Obviously, these are the very “friends” from whom Putin will have to hide further, otherwise they will swallow. He gave birth to them, but ... Taras Bulba had only two sons. And here - a huge pack of greedy bats, ready to gobble up the country with giblets and very upset that they are no longer understood in the West.
    2. Marconi41 28 May 2020 11: 53 New
      • 8
      • 7
      +1
      Quote: Deniska999
      Especially worth mentioning is the "bunker period" of the reign)

      I like these statements. Do you know something about the bunker? And if not, then people like you will write myths into history.
      1. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 20 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        Apparently he personally reported.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • The leader of the Redskins 28 May 2020 06: 38 New
    • 18
    • 3
    +15
    It depends on what year the textbook will be published, and you should not forget the "pointer from above".
    In my family:
    Grandfather and grandmother I.V. Stalin was idolized.
    Parents, thanks to the thaw, considered him a tyrant.
    I, a child of perestroika, received both this and that. Thanks to the multifaceted historian at school.
    My son. He just knows that there was such a leader just during the war. About the thaw, repressions, Turukhan and so on I heard "in passing" - that's how he was taught ...
    1. Hagen 28 May 2020 06: 50 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      My son. He just knows that there was such a leader just during the war. About the thaw, repressions, Turukhan and so on I heard "in passing" - that's how he was taught ...

      As Academician Arbatov said, the main teacher of history is the family. When did you say that
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      In my family:
      Grandfather and grandmother I.V. Stalin was idolized.
      Parents, thanks to the thaw, considered him a tyrant.
      I, a child of perestroika, received both this and that.

      You have confirmed it. Therefore to
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      that's how he was taught ...

      we must add ...
    2. aybolyt678 28 May 2020 08: 33 New
      • 11
      • 4
      +7
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      My son. He just knows that there was such a leader just during the war.

      Stalin was not just a leader, he was commander in chief .. it is customary to say about the military that such a general won such a battle, or they won the war under his command.
      The official point of view is that the people won the war! about Stalin at the parade of silence.
      and they will talk about Putin in the future as Khrushchev, who set a certain vector of raw material development, strengthened it, reduced the level of education, introduced the ideology of consumption
  • Evdokim 28 May 2020 06: 43 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    . "The era of Putin"

    Oslon believes that this is what will be included in history books in the paragraph on the time during which Vladimir Putin leads the country.

    I think it’s too early for me to write textbooks about Putin, it’s not yet retired. Yes, he himself most likely will disapprove.
    And also in the textbook “they will reflect the victory over the coronavirus”.

    As for the victory over the infection, it’s too early even to write in the newspapers of the relational report, and not something in the history textbooks. hi
    1. The leader of the Redskins 28 May 2020 07: 06 New
      • 10
      • 11
      -1
      The era of Putin ...
      Anecdote:
      An ancient highlander dies, the whole family has gathered. Highlander:
      - My grandchildren! When I was a child, a very wise man ruled the country, made a revolution, defeated the bourgeois ... what was the name of that time?
      - Leninism, grandfather!
      - Yes ... Leninism ... Then the right countryman. He defeated everyone in the great war! What was that time called?
      - Stalinism, grandfather!
      - Yes, Stalinism .... And I will die, will time be called differently?
      “No, Grandpa Onanius!” Do not die!....
      1. Insurgent 28 May 2020 07: 14 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Ancient Highlander Dies

        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        I'll die, will time be called differently?
        “No, Grandpa Onanius!” Do not die!....


        It’s hard for me to imagine a mountaineer named Onanius ...
        1. Well, then a joke about Cheburashka and the crocodile Gena, I won’t tell you - you certainly won’t imagine a soft toy and an amphibian ...
    2. Insurgent 28 May 2020 08: 38 New
      • 8
      • 9
      -1
      Quote: Evdokim
      I think it’s too early for me to write textbooks about Putin, it’s not yet retired. Yes, he himself most likely will disapprove.

      Correctly yes ,youdo not write a textbook no .

      "He will not approve"? There is reason to think so? After all, the" proposed by the people "procedure of" zeroing ", he is supportive and docile lol accepted ...

      What can’t you do for the sake of a people who ask and plead kneeling recourse .
  • rocket757 28 May 2020 06: 43 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    As usual, LIBRA!
    They will hang out here, here, everyone can pile their own, different.
    Seriously ... any leader is a product of the GOVERNING SYSTEM, for the allotted period of time!
    This is the system that should be considered, and not the face, set up in the frame of public viewing.
  • regdan 28 May 2020 06: 44 New
    • 26
    • 18
    +8
    Will go down in history books as a talker. So the people call him. And I said that softly.
  • Andrea 28 May 2020 06: 44 New
    • 18
    • 36
    -18
    Putin’s rule is historical in itself, and in terms of rank, it’s probably equal to the rule of Peter the Great and Catherine.
    As for “We,” how many are familiar with the neighbors on the landing?
    1. Alex777 28 May 2020 17: 47 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      Soon I will catch you in popularity. bully
      But as for us, it’s not up to the staircase neighbors.
  • Crystal of Truth 28 May 2020 06: 49 New
    • 18
    • 12
    +6
    I would not cling to power with all my strength I would come in as a good president ..
    And so ...
    1. Alex777 28 May 2020 17: 46 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      He will come in not just as good, but as great. But not soon.
      Are we not evaluating the finished legacy?
      GDP still has time to increase it. bully
      By the way, I will remind history buffs that Peter the Great personally raised Prince Menshikov repeatedly, but did not exile or execute him for some reason. wink
      As for clinging, I’m not sure that he will go to the next term.
      Just aware of some plans, what else can he do.
      When Prokhorov ran, I voted for him.
      It is still a shame that such an eccentric was. winked
      Everyone who sees Navalny in the presidents I advise you to look at Zelensky.
      They have the same level of readiness to be president. No. hi
      1. New Year day 29 May 2020 00: 02 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Alex777
        Peter the Great personally raised Prince Menshikov repeatedly, but did not exile or execute for some reason.

        How many Menshikov extended without Peter? And he would have been more modest, maybe he would have lived and ruled. But no, greed failed. And why are his friends and comrades better than Menshikov?
        1. Alex777 29 May 2020 09: 51 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And take an interest in how much he held out.
          And under Catherine, he was not in poverty.
          Ask why he was exiled to Berezovo.
          And the point is not in Menshikov, but in the fact that Peter is the Great. bully
  • Gardamir 28 May 2020 06: 50 New
    • 15
    • 8
    +7
    The court sociologist, what to expect from him. Fancy and nothing more
  • samarin1969 28 May 2020 06: 52 New
    • 10
    • 1
    +9
    [quoteOslon believes that this is what will be included in history books in the paragraph on the time during which Vladimir Putin leads the country. And also in the textbook “they will reflect the victory over the coronavirus”. There, according to the head of the POF, the theme of reunification with Crimea and the revival of the concept of “we” will be included.] [/ Quote]
    What does it mean to “enter” ?? ... In the main textbook of Torkunov 2016 “Putin's Era” 35 pages with the Crimea, all “strategies”, “concepts”, etc. are already devoted. By the amount of material, this “era” approximately corresponds to 20-30m . THE USSR.

    ps One wonders why exactly these few phrases of Mr. Oslan from a large interview deserved the attention of VO.
  • nobody111body 28 May 2020 06: 52 New
    • 10
    • 8
    +2
    so-so, not Tseerushnik Eltsin of course, but not Stalin, unfortunately; disgraced with retirement, the Bolsheviks in 28g already began to pay, and then the times were many times harder; threatened to reconsider the privatization and didn’t do a bit of truth, however, he tamed the oligarchs; somehow he decided to help Assad and the Syrians, but everything is done halfway: "bring down those planes and do not touch these"; finally he replaced like Medvedev, but sheltered the "pension reformer" Siluanov, although they fell on a certain Nazarov; to help the Syrians began the current when the Jews destroyed almost half of the country, although it was possible before; but is there a good export of gas? increased; and like explosions began to rattle less, and then under Eltsin, bazaars and subways and trains were blown up; of course, he did something, but the USSR as a state cannot return it to him; it's a pity
    1. depressant 28 May 2020 08: 17 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      No one’s colleague, with gas export, is just not very good. Even before coronavirus, Turkey reduced the volume of our gas consumed by 111 times. And so everything was written correctly. And your conclusion is correct.
      1. nobody111body 28 May 2020 08: 31 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Turkey, a long time ago NATO, we have nothing to catch there and we don’t need to, but gas processing ourselves is very necessary, since you can get a lot of valuable products after that; Yes, and oil is not very good raw materials drive
        1. depressant 28 May 2020 08: 39 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Exactly! We have huge non-gasified spaces, and even Tsar Nicholas II allowed to drive crude oil abroad only in the form of a negligible% of the total production - only kerosene and gasoline!
          1. Alex777 28 May 2020 10: 12 New
            • 5
            • 12
            -7
            Ka finished his journey Nicholas II?
            And who is struggling to save us, with our oil and gas, from the opportunity to sell them?
            You are directly quoting the State Department training manual. smile
            1. depressant 28 May 2020 12: 41 New
              • 9
              • 0
              +9
              I quote only a fact from the history of my country. I’m not familiar with the manuals of the State Department. And you, it seems, yes, if you so confidently mention that it contains the fact that the tsar has banned Russian crude from trading abroad. Puncture, colleague! Be careful!...
              Of course I'm joking. Neither you nor I have read any manuals — neither the State Department, nor the Kremlin. It’s just that each of us speaks of concern for the country, for our future in it, preferably a prosperous one. And it says from different perspectives. For me, the glass is already half empty, for you it is still half full. That's how we once overlooked the 92nd year.
              1. Alex777 28 May 2020 14: 03 New
                • 1
                • 11
                -10
                I do not know what we overlooked in 92g.
                In 91, I was stupid to go to protect the database. Not for long.
                In 93, Gaidar’s calls to defend him aroused only a grin. bully
                And you definitely noticed - my glass is half full.
                I entered the Moscow State University under Brezhnev, but I do not feel any nostalgia for the CPSU.
                And a great country, assembled by generations of ancestors and split into parts - is certainly a pity.
                As for the sale of resources - the higher the interdependence, the less chance of war.
                Everything that America is doing now, IMHO, everything is aimed at solving 2 problems:
                1) to return the industry back so as not to depend on anyone, as in 1941
                2) become thereby the "shameful" (as I understand you) seller of resources (having closed due to this his needs for oil).
                I happened to live in the US for almost 10 years. So I have some idea.
                When they solve these problems, then they will be able to fight not only with different Basmachi, but also with serious opponents. Like us and China.
                No need to help them in these 2 tasks. We must interfere by all means.
                As for gasoline ... We have many allies in Europe in the sale of oil, and nobody in the sale of gasoline. And diplomacy is the art of the possible. (Bismarck). hi
                The state is also not selling gasoline.
                1. tatra 28 May 2020 14: 45 New
                  • 8
                  • 2
                  +6
                  This is the essence of the enemies of the Communists in the USSR. You destroyed the USSR — and as a huge, de facto, centuries-old country, and as the best State — both in development and for the majority of the people, compared to the Russian Empire and your “independence” —but you will never admit it as your crimes before your country and people. You are AGAINST Soviet power — but not one of you is able to prove that the Romanovs or post-Soviet power is better for your country and people.
                  1. Alex777 28 May 2020 15: 37 New
                    • 0
                    • 6
                    -6
                    My lady
                    You obviously are not feeling well. Personally, I did not destroy anything. bully
                    But the leaders of the CPSU, in the person of Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Shevardnadze, Nazarbayev, Kravchuk, Shushkevich Yakovlev, etc. - they are. Destroyed.
                    There are so many materials on this subject that he who has eyes will see.
                    Zyuganov won the election with Yeltsin in 96 and quietly merged. wink
                    So do not get the blame on the healthy. hi
                    You can still recall that before the revolutionary events, Poland and Finland were part of Russia.
                    And there was a wonderful country until Nicholas II went over the Turkish Straits to fight in the World War. No.1 country was in the world.
                    The whole school was compared how much the USSR produced and smelted and what Russia had in 1911.
                2. Crystal of Truth 28 May 2020 17: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Why should they fight with you?
  • Mavrikiy 28 May 2020 07: 02 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    I wonder how NOM FOM and its chairman, Sasha Oslon, will go down in history. fool And he probably wants to come in as a prophet. To do this, dust was shaken off from "the Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky," the clown began to forget.
    And also in the textbook “they will reflect the victory over the coronavirus”.
    this nonsense will be forgotten, after 10 years, who recalls the bird flu? WIKI:
    In the 2013 mayoral election in Moscow, the FOM forecast data significantly diverged from the results (Sergei Sobyanin's rating was overestimated, and his opponents underestimated). President of the Fund Alexander Oslon recognized this discrepancy, explaining it as the only reason - the absence of a significant portion of potential voters Sobyanin; as an explanation for the low turnout, he, in turn, proposed the hypothesis that on election day, many of them preferred to work in summer cottages. Oslon also promised in the future. Alexander Oslon. Elections in Moscow. Sociological incident (September 12, 2013).
    This is how the fund works. repeat
  • Van 16 28 May 2020 07: 03 New
    • 13
    • 5
    +8
    It's too early to judge. As Stirlitz said, the last phrase is remembered. Putin hasn’t gone anywhere yet, he hasn’t said the last phrase. If we assume that he leaves tomorrow, he will be remembered for the following events, of which only one positive thing: he annexed Crimea, raised his retirement age, changed the Constitution for himself, self-reset, self-insulated.
    1. Gardamir 28 May 2020 07: 41 New
      • 12
      • 8
      +4
      the last phrase is remembered.
      Crimea is no longer the last phrase, and it was mastered, as was allegedly victory at the time in Chechnya.
      1. Van 16 28 May 2020 07: 49 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        I agree. But I wanted to at least remember something good, of the minuses I could add a lot more (non-fulfillment of almost all of my promises, the vertical of power on the principle of personal loyalty and “please”, etc.), but only that was remembered from the positive.
        1. depressant 28 May 2020 08: 30 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Facts are remembered, not intentions. The history books will include the annexation of Crimea, the prevention of Chechnya from leaving Russia, as well as the Syrian war. Interpretation of these events will be given in accordance with the worldviews of subsequent first persons. Either negative or positive. Perhaps without mentioning the name of Putin. He practically does not mention Stalin even in the context of the Second World War.
          1. Alex777 28 May 2020 15: 57 New
            • 1
            • 7
            -6
            The history books will include the annexation of Crimea, the prevention of Chechnya's exit from Russia

            Chechnya’s exit from Russia was the first step in dividing it into pieces.
            So far, in addition to GDP, we have another "president".
            And when he came to the leadership, “presidents” were on every corner.
            They took sovereignty as much as they could, as the EBN suggested.
            Stalin Putin mentions. Although I would do it less.
            My grandfather was surrounded near Kiev ...
            3 times fled from the concentration camp. 3 times he was caught and tortured.
            For the fourth time, he was able to leave.
            And all who stayed died ...
  • Break through 28 May 2020 07: 09 New
    • 12
    • 36
    -24
    Will enter as one of the great rulers of the history of Russia. Which pulled the country from the pit of the 90s. Which returned the Crimea. The country is one big construction site it pleases. As I recall, Yekaterinburg 90's already bad at heart. Now the norm. Skyscrapers are all things, schools, hospitals. The fate of our country is only to go forward. In short, Putin will rule another 12 years. Therefore, our enemies and rage. So they need it!
    1. AUL
      AUL 28 May 2020 07: 50 New
      • 21
      • 9
      +12
      Quote: Break through
      Will enter as one of the great rulers of the history of Russia.

      As the chairman of the cooperative "Lake"!
      1. Break through 28 May 2020 08: 54 New
        • 8
        • 24
        -16
        Yes, even a cooperative Sea. The main thing is great and the people know this.
    2. AU Ivanov. 28 May 2020 12: 03 New
      • 2
      • 8
      -6
      Indeed, E-Burg is a city of skyscrapers. From a smelly Soviet city turned into a beautiful and well-groomed capital of the Urals. However, like Peter. A city for which it is not a shame.
    3. New Year day 29 May 2020 00: 07 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Break through
      Which pulled the country from the pit of the 90s.

      maybe still the high oil price pulled out? Now it has fallen and the "thrust" is not visible laughing
      Quote: Break through
      Skyscrapers are all things, schools, hospitals.

      Churches across the country have forgotten! laughing
  • parusnik 28 May 2020 07: 49 New
    • 17
    • 6
    +11
    Hmm ... deflection is protected smile
    1. Insurgent 28 May 2020 07: 55 New
      • 15
      • 7
      +8
      Quote: parusnik
      Hmm ... deflection is protected smile

      It happens that a personality is made a cult, but sometimes it’s just a bubble inflated ...
  • Egoza 28 May 2020 07: 49 New
    • 14
    • 1
    +13
    You can "enter" into history textbooks, but into a HISTORY - get involved. And only time and folk memory will show who really came in, and who only briefly will be remembered on occasion.
    1. Was mammoth 28 May 2020 08: 17 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Egoza
      You can "enter" into history textbooks, but into a HISTORY - get involved. And only time and folk memory will show who really came in, and who only briefly will be remembered on occasion.

      There is a law in Russia. On perpetuating the memory of presidents. Vanity is not the last trait of rulers. So, in addition to donkeys (who will remember his words in at least a month?), Museums await us not only Yeltsin, but Putin and Medvedev. The straw is laid out. wink
      Out of relation to Putin, he went down in history. Both on business and on the long term. Now, will all his affairs in the museum be displayed?
  • Naemnik 28 May 2020 07: 57 New
    • 5
    • 13
    -8
    It depends on who will create the textbook ... If from the Soros Foundation, then it’s clear who will present it.
    1. New Year day 29 May 2020 00: 19 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Naemnik
      It depends on who will create the textbook ... If from the Soros Foundation, then it’s clear who will present it.

      and if today's "fans", then this is already being done ..
      In the St. Petersburg polyclinic ...

      In the Tula Regional Library and the Tula Museum of Local Lore ...

      Just fans ...

      a little more, a little more and ...
  • Vitaly Tsymbal 28 May 2020 08: 00 New
    • 8
    • 6
    +2
    Well, very, very, some backdoors want to make Putin "great" or "wise", but so far it has not worked out ... UNTIL !!!! And the story itself will remember “who needs it”))) Although each “sovereign” has its own story - one mausoleum built, the second mausoleum hangs, the third will demolish it (and maybe it will build a shopping and entertainment complex in exchange) .... we won’t guess, what remains in history and what does not, because we ourselves will eventually go down in history.
  • Ded_Mazay 28 May 2020 08: 09 New
    • 8
    • 16
    -8
    Pique vests gathered, to judge who is the mother of history more expensive. lol
    At the same time, everyone considers himself an “expert” and speaks with conviction for the whole people.
    1. sergo1914 28 May 2020 09: 39 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Quote: Ded_Mazay
      Pique vests gathered, to judge who is the mother of history more expensive. lol
      At the same time, everyone considers himself an “expert” and speaks with conviction for the whole people.


      1) the sum of a large number of subjective assessments usually gives an objective assessment
      2) do not be angry. No one is to blame for the fact that experts on saving rabbits from flooding are not in demand on military resources.
      1. Ded_Mazay 28 May 2020 10: 41 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: sergo1914
        Quote: Ded_Mazay
        Pique vests gathered, to judge who is the mother of history more expensive. lol
        At the same time, everyone considers himself an “expert” and speaks with conviction for the whole people.


        1) the sum of a large number of subjective assessments usually gives an objective assessment
        2) do not be angry. No one is to blame for the fact that experts on saving rabbits from flooding are not in demand on military resources.


        KAMAZ of cobblestones will never become a granite block. You will never get an objective assessment based on subjective opinions. It can be obtained only on the basis of objective facts, and a fair amount of them is covered in darkness, impenetrable to an outside observer.
        So I,
        Quote: sergo1914
        flood rescue experts.
        and I’m not trying to pose as a political scientist or a sociologist, for which I urge you to.
    2. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 10 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Ded_Mazay
      Pique vests gathered, to judge who is the mother of history more expensive. lol
      At the same time, everyone considers himself an “expert” and speaks with conviction for the whole people.


      We still won’t know, and it’s not for us to judge ... yes
  • ximkim 28 May 2020 08: 15 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    There will be another president, he will write in a book about the "good" deeds of his predecessor. You can’t hide anything from history, and it won’t reach them.
  • In Russia, freedom of speech, right? So, I express my opinion. Putin will go down in history as a weak and weak-willed politician, afraid to rigidly ask his subordinates for not doing work. Almost quote: "Well, you, dear, you do not have time to swing." In addition, he will go down in history as the patron of corruption and theft, which under him reached unprecedented proportions. Almost a quote: "It is unacceptable to plant thieves and traitors to the interests of the people, but this is not the 37th year." There is nothing black and white in the world, right? That is, he did something useful for Russia - he returned Crimea, for example. In general, an assessment of his activities for the benefit of Russia and the Russian people will be in the region of the two with a plus.
    1. sergo1914 28 May 2020 09: 41 New
      • 10
      • 7
      +3
      Quote: I think logically ... occasionally
      weak and weak-willed politician,


      Do not tell. Would you be able to throw a pen on the table during an online meeting with subordinates?
  • cniza 28 May 2020 08: 48 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    FOM President: how Putin will enter history books


    This will be evaluated by the descendants of 100 years later, and now there will be no objectivity ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • apro 28 May 2020 08: 49 New
    • 15
    • 5
    +10
    I think the time of today's president will be dubbed ... the time of missed opportunities.
    1. Freeman 28 May 2020 09: 12 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Quote: apro
      I think the time of today's president will be dubbed ... the time of missed opportunities.

      I think that this time will be called
      - "The time when there is no time / to swing /".
      wassat
      1. AUL
        AUL 28 May 2020 10: 40 New
        • 11
        • 3
        +8
        Quote: Freeman
        I think that this time will be called

        The reign of Vladimir Zero!
  • Ded_Mazay 28 May 2020 09: 00 New
    • 2
    • 11
    -9
    Quote: cniza
    and now there will be no objectivity ...

    Actually, this can be seen in the comments ...
  • Freeman 28 May 2020 09: 06 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    According to him, the most popular politicians among citizens of the Russian Federation (in addition to President Vladimir Putin) are LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, current cabinet chairman Mikhail Mishustin, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

    The competence of a sociologist who confuses the concepts of “fame” and “popularity” raises serious doubts.
    If the Saratov deputy Bondarenko were mentioned in the media as much as the characters mentioned, then by fame and popularity, he would have "put them in a belt."
  • Gennady Korsunov 28 May 2020 09: 07 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    History is then. And, what they will talk about him later, I think the people are of little interest. But what the people are now talking about him and his entourage did not bother them all to listen, so as not to share the fate of Ceausescu !!
  • Pvi1206 28 May 2020 09: 08 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    to live to see this time ...
  • Roman123567 28 May 2020 09: 09 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    According to him, the most popular politicians among Russian citizens (besides President Vladimir Putin) are the LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky,


    Where are these citizens ?? Show me at least two ..))
    1. sergo1914 28 May 2020 09: 43 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Roman123567
      According to him, the most popular politicians among Russian citizens (besides President Vladimir Putin) are the LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky,


      Where are these citizens ?? Show me at least two ..))


      In the text surnames are sounded. What's wrong? Or do you think that Zhirinovsky does not consider himself the most popular politician in the world?
      1. Roman123567 28 May 2020 09: 46 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        the most popular politicians among citizens of the Russian Federation

        Zhirinovsky considers himself the most popular politician in the world?


        Whom the citizens of the Russian Federation consider popular, and whom Zhirinovsky considers popular are two big differences ..
  • GMM
    GMM 28 May 2020 09: 13 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    Quote: Gardamir
    Crimea, yes, I agree, you can and should be entered in the textbook
    as well as gifts to the Norwegians, Chinese, Azerbaijanis, ...

    90 percent, members of the sect of witnesses of the upcoming reset, do not understand the meaning of what you wrote, well, except for Crimea, ours.
    They should have explained that all of the above is not ours ...
  • Oleg Skvortsov 28 May 2020 09: 29 New
    • 11
    • 4
    +7
    Lord, another lick of the Kremlin fifth points. To listen to such people is not to respect yourself. What can I say - I earned myself on caviar with butter laughing
  • ventich62 28 May 2020 09: 35 New
    • 13
    • 5
    +8
    It will go into textbooks ... With a big minus sign ...
  • cosmonaut 28 May 2020 09: 50 New
    • 14
    • 6
    +8
    the bourgeois president. everything that was left to the people from the USSR destroyed everything for the benefit of the bourgeois. privileges, pensions, etc. a worthy student of Yeltsin and Gorbachev
  • evgen1221 28 May 2020 10: 33 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    An article from a series of regular mantras and health resorts of modern agitprop for those close to power. Putin did for the country what he could, and in no way above his head like Lenin, Stalin did not jump. Take away, more of his case will be seen as a struggle against circumstances with varying success. The people will remember it as a mean scum with a hand in the hands and no more, if not at all, against the background. But for the bureaucracy of the bureaucracy of all ranks, the yes-breadwinner and father, who smell more monuments than Lenin will build.
  • vit670 28 May 2020 10: 33 New
    • 12
    • 4
    +8
    Quote: apro
    I think the time of today's president will be dubbed ... the time of missed opportunities.

    Crimea is credited to Putin! This is necessary! There is no merit of it! He simply was forced to recognize the Crimea. For he could lose power.! The people of Crimea spoke for Russia. There could have begun such a massacre that "Mama Do not Cry" Do not recognize the Crimea - it was to lose face and power! Putin did not want to quarrel with the West, oh how he did not want and was afraid. And I had to! All his indecision and cowardice manifested (and is now manifested) in the Donbass! How did he survey, take a "permit" to send troops to the Donbass, and give back this "permit"? I did not dare. Now we are reaping the benefits! Through the efforts of Putin, they raised the enemy at their side! And this is not for one generation! Imagine how the United States would lead if such a mess had begun in, say, Mexico? And so cowardice and nothing more.
  • vit670 28 May 2020 10: 44 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    Quote: Break through
    Will enter as one of the great rulers of the history of Russia. Which pulled the country from the pit of the 90s. Which returned the Crimea. The country is one big construction site it pleases. As I recall, Yekaterinburg 90's already bad at heart. Now the norm. Skyscrapers are all things, schools, hospitals. The fate of our country is only to go forward. In short, Putin will rule another 12 years. Therefore, our enemies and rage. So they need it!

    In Crimea, merit Putin zero! He did not want to take Crimea, did not want to quarrel with the West! But he was forced to take the Crimea. Some Russians live there and Bandera would start cutting them! Putin would not have sat on the throne in this situation. And this is the main point! And so all his lack of will manifested itself in the Donbass to the fullest. Raised the enemy under his nose!
    1. AU Ivanov. 28 May 2020 11: 57 New
      • 1
      • 7
      -6
      Of course I didn’t want to, with a gun at my temple I was forced. The decision to recognize Crimea was made in a couple of days, and before that, power support was provided to Crimea. Those same "polite people" Sure, merit zero!
    2. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 04 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      In Crimea, merit Putin zero!


      This is just your point of view and no more ...
  • alone 28 May 2020 10: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    People write history .. Not everything that is written in history textbooks is true .. And as for Putin, of course he will fall into a history textbook ... But how, this is a completely different story hi
  • vit670 28 May 2020 10: 47 New
    • 11
    • 4
    +7
    Quote: vit670
    Quote: Break through
    Will enter as one of the great rulers of the history of Russia. Which pulled the country from the pit of the 90s. Which returned the Crimea. The country is one big construction site it pleases. As I recall, Yekaterinburg 90's already bad at heart. Now the norm. Skyscrapers are all things, schools, hospitals. The fate of our country is only to go forward. In short, Putin will rule another 12 years. Therefore, our enemies and rage. So they need it!

    In Crimea, merit Putin zero! He did not want to take Crimea, did not want to quarrel with the West! But he was forced to take the Crimea. Some Russians live there and Bandera would start cutting them! Putin would not have sat on the throne in this situation. And this is the main point! And so all his lack of will manifested itself in the Donbass to the fullest. Raised the enemy under his nose!

    And the descendants will judge him: for more than 20 years of rule, the people have become poorer, and billionaires have become more and they have become richer !!!
    1. AU Ivanov. 28 May 2020 11: 27 New
      • 4
      • 12
      -8
      Under Yeltsin, the people lived undoubtedly richer. Like cheese in butter skated.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. ventich62 28 May 2020 11: 50 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        Under Yeltsin, the people lived undoubtedly richer. Like cheese in butter skated.

        You would have compared with the post-war devastation, or at times serfdom ...
        1. AU Ivanov. 28 May 2020 11: 54 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          I compared with his immediate predecessor, and not with ancient times. The nineties and present times are day and night. Even against the background of the late USSR, Putin looks decent.
          1. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 02 New
            • 4
            • 9
            -5
            It is not possible for contemporaries to give an objective assessment of Putin, but one thing is certain - there is much more positive than negative.
            1. AU Ivanov. 28 May 2020 13: 13 New
              • 2
              • 8
              -6
              There are no ideal rulers, in principle, any coin has two sides. But the fact that Putin prevented the collapse of the country, restored the armed forces, raised the standard of living and returned Crimea home is undeniable. For all his externally and domestic political mistakes.
              1. cniza 28 May 2020 13: 31 New
                • 2
                • 6
                -4
                Namely, and I repeat, we cannot evaluate our contemporary, our descendants will do it.
          2. ventich62 28 May 2020 20: 28 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            20 years is a lot! Stalin before the Second World War conducted industrialization, collectivization, rearmament of the army, built a fleet. The USSR defeated Germany (the current ones in Syria are already messing around longer). 5 years after the Second World War (the time of the war is worse than the Yeltsin years, you must agree) - the post-war devastation has been eliminated, prices are going down! Here is a leader and an effective manager! And Putin - what did he do for the people? Friends are all attached, do not care about the rest ...
          3. New Year day 29 May 2020 00: 21 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: AU Ivanov.
            Even against the background of the late USSR, Putin looks decent.

            and now, against the background of current oil prices, how does it look? Fortune turned back? laughing
  • vit670 28 May 2020 10: 52 New
    • 10
    • 6
    +4
    Quote: Gennady Korsunov
    History is then. And, what they will talk about him later, I think the people are of little interest. But what the people are now talking about him and his entourage did not bother them all to listen, so as not to share the fate of Ceausescu !!

    Do not worry! And what is the Rosguard created at the head of his personal guard and friend Zolotov? 350 thousand bayonets, and even a million cops! He pays them be healthy and exorbitant benefits!
  • Shelest2000 28 May 2020 11: 35 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    FOM President: how Putin will enter history books

    Definitely! But not on a par with Stalin, Catherine, Peter I and even Brezhnev. In this row there is no place for him. His place is in another row - with Vlasov, Krasnov, Trukhin and his beloved killer of Leningrad, Mannerheim, who was trying to stick a commemorative plaque here.
  • Marconi41 28 May 2020 12: 00 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    The story includes all the rulers, both good and bad. At that time, many bad ones become good and vice versa. 20 years of the country still can not be thrown in the trash.
    1. cniza 28 May 2020 12: 55 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      Of course, even during this period a whole generation has grown and only time will give an estimate.
  • Kushka 28 May 2020 12: 30 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    He was at the same factory with the director. Led in
    brand new tool shop. Chief
    also new, young. We arrive at the clutter workshop
    in the morning, the boss is like a squirrel, from one site to another.
    The director stood, watched, waited until they noticed.
    I noticed it fits. Well, the director expressed himself so firmly
    and says - I don’t need a boss who has everyone standing,
    and he runs around them. You have to be in place, and around
    you should spin everything.
    .. [quote = depressant] And now, imagine that the president got sick,
    and the country was in the hands of ...... ...... To lose the president at a dangerous moment is dangerous! "
    What kind of power is it and the order in it that its fate is directly
    one person depends?
  • Sergo go 28 May 2020 14: 41 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Quote: Marconi41
    Quote: Ros 56
    One more confirmation that our homegrown liberalists and especially foreigners simply lie about Stalin.

    The role in the history of Stalin is not unambiguous. On the one hand, repression, on the other, economic growth and victory in the Second World War. So it will be with Putin. The bad will be forgotten over time, and the Caucasus and Crimea will remain part of the country. All this will be decided by descendants, not WE.

    20 years of stagnation and degradation of the economy, corruption, impoverishment of the people, the rise of the oligarchy, anti-people’s laws and lies, descendants will clearly appreciate what they deserve
  • Maxwrx 28 May 2020 15: 24 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The era of stagnation or even degradation. Brezhnev is also not often remembered.
  • NordUral 28 May 2020 20: 13 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    how Putin will enter history books
    Most likely there will be no history with him and nowhere he will enter. Everything goes to that.
    1. Campanella 29 May 2020 21: 23 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      That’s for sure, Putin, with his “wise” rule, will bring “new” reformers like Yeltsin into power, and then the champions of all kinds of freedoms will triumph again, drowning Russia in blood.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • faterdom 28 May 2020 21: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    You need to think about it. Putin himself first. And not some FOM, it’s too early, very early.
    The ancient Romans did not say he died, they said "he lived!" And only this line is already such that it is possible to give assessments - what was the person and his deeds.
    Putin now has all the cards on hand: the deadline is the last, even if it lasts another 20 years, I think the results of his team’s economic activity are obvious to him as well, the “partners” have completely self-revealed, soon the Americans will resume nuclear tests (is it time for us to , for persuasiveness?), people have already soared from fines and taxes, + "self-isolation" at their own expense, bankers swell, and almost all state assistance to at least someone - indirectly helping banks in the first place, healthcare - what, then we’ll let fireworks go in honor of a successful reform? Pensioner again ...
    In short, a certain “slave in the galleys” must in many respects row exactly in the opposite direction, and throwing out all these “Sebastian Pireirs” from this galley.
    Well, or will go into the textbooks number three, for Gorbachev and Yeltsin ...
    It, of course, is the Yeltsin Center, and all that, only this is what the people think about this - no "textbooks" will help them ...