Poland by its intransigence plays in favor of both Nord Stream

102

On the morning of May 26, the Russian company Gazprom completely stopped pumping its gas to Europe through Poland. We are talking about the Polish section of the pipeline connecting the Russian Yamal Peninsula with European countries.

Stop or pause?


Immediately after crossing Poland, the gas pipe enters the German border, where it falls into the zone of responsibility of the German operator Gascade. It was her representatives who said that the gas pressure in it was zero.



If we count in units of energy, then on May 24, the Polish pipe passed 9 million kilowatt hours. The next day, the volumes decreased to 451,5 thousand kilowatt hours, and on Tuesday morning they completely reset to zero.

Representative of the Fitch agency Dmitry Marinchenko sees the reason for this in the relatively low demand for gas in Europe with an overabundance of supply. He suggests that this situation will lead to a decrease in total exports in this direction by about 15-20 percent:

In this regard, it is logical that pumping through individual routes falls.

Moreover, the expert believes that such a transit stop will not drag on for long. After all, Russia is not going to completely abandon any of its routes for the supply of natural gas to Europe. This is a low demand for blue fuel today, and nobody knows what will happen tomorrow.

There is no long-term contract, okay ...


Although the stoppage of natural gas transit through Poland was initiated by Gazprom, the actions of the Polish side led him to this step. After all, the validity of the transit agreement, which was valid for the last 25 years, ended on May 16 this year. Now Russia and Poland are not bound by long-term transit obligations, and Gazprom must reserve capacity in advance for each quarter in advance of the Polish section of the Yamal-Europe pipeline.

Russia's obligation to pump 40 billion cubic meters of gas through Ukraine annually (moreover, according to the “download or pay” scheme) and fluctuations in demand from European consumers, coupled with the intricacies of using the constructed SP-1 and the constructed SP-2, creates some inconvenience for Gazprom. They force Russia to seek ways to best distribute gas flows along different routes. And now, after there is no longer a link to the fixed volumes of Polish transit of Russian gas, it is this direction that can be used to balance supplies to Europe.

True, it should be recognized that pumping gas through Belarus and Poland is much more profitable than Ukrainian transit. This is a more direct and shorter route, and Polish transit is almost three times cheaper than Ukrainian. Moreover, the pipeline itself, which runs through the territory of Russia and Belarus, belongs to Gazprom to the Polish border. Of course, the Poles were going to raise prices, but they didn’t have time. It suddenly turned out that about 80 percent of the Polish pipe’s capacity, Gazprom had already reserved for the third quarter of this year.

Poles help Nord Stream


The aspirations of the Poles are understandable. They intend to weaken their dependence on Gazprom by diversifying gas transmission flows. They do it in several directions at once. The first is the LNG terminal in иноwinoujцеcie, where liquefied gas arrives in tankers, mainly from the United States. The second option is very similar to the one used by Ukraine over the past few years. This is a virtual gas reverse from Germany. And the Poles begin to implement the third option this year. This is the construction of the Baltic Pipe gas pipeline, through which through 2023 Norwegian gas will be supplied to Poland through Denmark.

Warsaw has long been talking about its unwillingness to have long-term contractual obligations with Gazprom. Now the Poles dream has finally come true, and no contracts with a Russian company connect them.


And be that as it may, this state of affairs gives Gazprom the opportunity to increase the load on the Nord Stream pipeline. Here, of course, there are limitations that upset both the Russian company and its German partners. Unfortunately, half of the capacity of any gas pipeline passing through the territory of the European Union, according to European rules, should remain free for other companies that would also want to use this pipe. But this norm does not in fact apply to Nord Stream, since Europe needs gas, and it has not been possible to find alternative suppliers of gas for injection into the pipe.

And the OPAL gas pipeline, which delivers Russian gas, continuing the Nord Stream pipeline through Germany to other European countries, should only be half loaded.

But, in fact, Gazprom so far has the ability to fully download it. This is due to the fact that there is also the Eugal pipeline, which was laid to continue the construction of Nord Stream 2. But now, due to the restrictions introduced, it is necessary to connect it to transport gas coming from SP-1.

Of course, after the opening of SP-2, which is supposed to take place approximately at the turn of 2020 and 2021, everything will change. After all, then Eugal will have to be connected to the new gas pipeline, and then both pipes will be half empty.


Now a legitimate question arises. And why did Russia build the Nord Stream 2, if it does not have the right to use it? After all, OPAL and Eugal, loaded at half capacity due to European restrictions, will not be able to pump more than the already existing Nord Stream gas pipeline passes?

Perhaps this contradiction is much easier to solve than it might seem. Today, when almost all of Europe complies with quarantine, its industry is far from operating at full capacity. Because of this, gas demand is much lower than usual. But earlier, according to "dock" forecasts, an increase in total gas consumption on the continent was expected. This means that Europe’s demand for Russian gas will grow over time. And this is despite the projected decrease in the share of our fuel in European consumption from 39 to 34 percent.

I think the European Union is able to comply with the restrictions they set exactly as long as this does not go against the interests of European business. And then for Gazprom, an exception to any rule can be made by canceling the requirement for a 50 percent load of its pipelines. Moreover, in such cases, Europeans have already acted in a similar way. The same example with "SP".

And this means that both the Nord Stream and Ukrainian transit, and Polish still come in handy. Moreover, today no one knows exactly how events will develop.

One thing is clear: the new transit conditions through Poland will in no way affect either the total export of Russian gas or the working conditions of Nord Stream. But now they are already leading to the understanding by Europeans of the fact that intractable transit countries can only interfere with "energy" contacts. In other words, with its intransigence, Poland itself, unwittingly, plays in favor of both Nord Stream. Because of Ukraine, “SP-2” began to build, and Poland is doing everything to implement it 100 percent.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 May 2020 08: 03
    Germany will need a lot of gas soon. Therefore, SP 2 is not worth worrying about. German business will prefer pipeline gas over LNG.
    1. -4
      27 May 2020 08: 33
      Poland plays intransigence

      Poland already played with Germany in the late 30s of the last century.
      Apparently not enough.
      That's who needs to sculpt on cars "We can repeat"
      1. +15
        27 May 2020 10: 08
        Quote: Mitroha
        Poland already played with Germany in the late 30s of the last century.
        Apparently not enough.

        Do you think that the Germans sleep and see to make friends with Russia against the Poles, Americans and other Ukrainians with the British? Today's Germans have "slightly" different goals. Among the main ones:
        - maintain and strengthen the European Union, while remaining the dominant country in this system;
        - maintain a unified North Atlantic security system;
        - restrain the economic and military-political development of Russia;
        - turn Russia into a raw materials appendage of the West;
        - deprive Russia of the possibility of political influence on Ukraine and Belarus, leaving her the role of the actual economic donor of these countries.
        Quote: Mitroha
        That's who needs to sculpt on cars "We can repeat"

        Do not expect such obscurantism from the Germans. It is naive and even stupid. Your views on the world are infinitely out of date.
        1. +11
          27 May 2020 11: 31
          Quote: kjhg
          Quote: Mitroha
          That's who needs to sculpt on cars "We can repeat"

          Do not expect such obscurantism from the Germans. It is naive and even stupid. Your views on the world are infinitely out of date.

          this is exactly - "history repeats itself twice: the first time in the form of a tragedy, the second - in the form of a farce." Who will repeat? Earlier - "For Lenin, for Stalin, for the Motherland!", And today - "For Sechin, Rotenberg and Putin"? - It's not even funny request
        2. +5
          27 May 2020 11: 40
          Quote: kihg
          Do you think that the Germans are sleeping and seeing to make friends with Russia against the Poles, Americans and other Ukrainians with the British?

          Where did you read this in my comment?
          Do not make assumptions about my thoughts and answer your assumptions, this is not your thing. hi
          Quote: kihg
          Your views on the world are infinitely out of date

          And your thinking is too straightforward.
        3. -2
          27 May 2020 12: 24
          Quote: kjhg
          Do you think that the Germans sleep and see to make friends with Russia against the Poles, Americans and other Ukrainians with the British? Today's Germans have "slightly" different goals. Among the main ones:

          Are you sure that in ten years the European Union will exist in its current form and Brexit was the country's last exit from the EU?
          I think that Soros is not in vain predicting the collapse of the EU - this con man clearly holds his nose in the wind, so sometimes you should listen to those who talk about the prospects of the European Union on the other side.
          And the Germans are not as complaisant as it may seem to someone - while they are only trying to save the EU, that’s why they are pursuing such a policy. But if it falls apart, then I think their policy towards Russia will change - they can count money.
        4. -8
          27 May 2020 13: 00
          Quote: kjhg
          Today's Germans have "slightly" different goals. Among the main ones:

          Somehow emotionally, but most likely intuitively ...
          Quote: kjhg
          preserve and strengthen the European Union, remaining the dominant country in this system

          At the same time, Merkel divides the EU into "two speeds", which political analysts assess as irritation from the need to constantly feed the recipient countries. In actions, this irritation manifested itself in the refusal to provide assistance to other EU countries, such as Italy.
          Quote: kjhg
          maintain a unified North Atlantic security system

          The protege Merkel Leyen expresses support for Macron’s idea of ​​forming an EU army with defense capabilities against the United States! without excessive centralization of command. Merkel was not in vain appointing Leyen Minister of Defense. She, on the pretext of the unavailability of her subordinates, refused to send an agreed contingent of 1600 Bundeswehr soldiers to Iraq. Do you want to call it the strengthening of NATO? In my opinion, this is a sabotage of NATO / US decisions. Moreover, NATO generals (even Polish) aloud express confidence in the absence of threats of military invasion from Russia, and the Germans are not trying to correct them. Strange, isn't it?
          Quote: kjhg
          restrain the economic and military-political development of Russia

          I think they do not care. German business is seeping into Russia, knowing that there is a large and sought-after market. He at full strength expresses fatigue from the sanctions imposed under US pressure. Many joint ventures with their participation continue to operate in Russia, including Mercedes, Siemens, and ZF?
          Quote: kjhg
          turn Russia into a raw materials appendage of the West;

          Rather, they want to be able to reduce the cost of raw materials for their economy. But there is a difficult struggle with the Sosrosov party of "greens", which are strengthening their presence in the Bundestag.
          Quote: kjhg
          Do not expect such obscurantism from the Germans.

          Everything here is ghostly. The Germans themselves will not unleash the war, but in the second echelons, they can go after the United States. Although not a fact. And judging by how Trump "played back" in the dispute with Eun, it is unlikely that he is seriously planning to start a big war with us or China. The emphasis has shifted to economic and informational areas. If so where they will show activity, it will be in Central Asia through northern Afghanistan by the forces of "alien hands". The Germans in this business can only participate in finances and materials.
        5. +5
          27 May 2020 16: 32
          Quote: kjhg
          - deprive Russia of the possibility of political influence on Ukraine and Belarus, leaving her the role of the actual economic donor of these countries.


          The Germans do not sleep at night, everyone thinks about Ukraine and Belarus. The Germans have no other concerns now.
        6. +10
          27 May 2020 16: 32
          "to turn Russia into a raw material appendage" - Why, she turned into him long ago. Need proof?
    2. +20
      27 May 2020 08: 34
      "German businesses will prefer pipeline gas over LNG." - I think German business will prefer cheaper gas. And it will turn out to be pipeline or liquefied ...
    3. +12
      27 May 2020 11: 04
      Poland by its intransigence plays in favor of both Nord Stream


      And victory again! It’s a series of continuous successes in foreign policy! Pret so rushing.
    4. +6
      27 May 2020 13: 18
      German business will prefer the gas that will be cheaper. Considering the fact that LNG enters the European market en masse in the middle of 2020, what and at what prices will Europe still buy that question!
      1. +19
        27 May 2020 15: 30
        Quote: dgonni
        at what prices will europe buy that question

        There is no question about the price of LNG. Europe will buy American LNG at the price that the US will set it. And yes, it is beneficial for Europe to buy gas from Russia.
        1. +3
          27 May 2020 16: 39
          Europe will buy gas at a market price. And the mattresses will not install anything there. For there are Qatar and Australia, which also set their sights on the European market. Russia also took up LNG, albeit a bit late.
          Unfortunately for Miller and CO, technology has dramatically changed the world and reality. And if before there was a seller’s market in Europe and GDP could lordly say, they say cheaper than 400+ killed raccoons of gas do not wait. That in modern realities of the same gas turned out to be just heaps. And the market struggle for the buyer begins.
          And given the level of Gazprom management, the loss of part of the market is inevitable.
    5. +6
      27 May 2020 15: 57
      Germany will need a lot of gas soon. Therefore, SP 2 is not worth worrying about.

      Yeah, in Russia nobody needs him anymore, he just has to sell it to Germany.
    6. +11
      27 May 2020 23: 25
      Quote: Break through
      German business will prefer pipeline gas over LNG

      It all depends on two factors. The first factor is the price of gas. The second factor is security and constancy of supply. Whoever provides these conditions will be the Germans who will buy gas in the future.
  2. -7
    27 May 2020 08: 06
    And why did Russia build the Nord Stream 2, if it does not have the right to use it? After all, OPAL and Eugal, loaded at half capacity due to European restrictions,
    And if the Gulf Stream cools down? Lifeguard Zipper will save Europe, Well, and S. America "By herself, by herself!" feel
    1. +9
      27 May 2020 08: 22
      By the way, it can’t cool down (because it’s warm at the equator) Here, the Greenland cold and the golf stream can mix and then the golf stream will flow west of Britain to the south (in a small circle). then in the north of Europe to Murmansk itself - a tough arctic climate will begin. And the south and west of Europe from Britain to Spain will become very warm. The temperate climate will become approximately subtropical, in some places where the subtropics can go to the tropics in southern Spain. But such processes have been going on for thousands of years, the pipes will rot by then.
    2. +4
      27 May 2020 11: 32
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      What if...

      Global projects on these conditions? laughing Some kind of manilism is obtained
  3. +11
    27 May 2020 08: 08
    To everyone who has industry, gas will be needed, and not a little, as well as oil and other other raw materials.
    But this is not a reason for complacency, but an exact instruction to develop your industry comprehensively, harmoniously ....
    1. +6
      27 May 2020 08: 40
      And also, for example, Germany refuses nuclear power plants, which means gas will be needed ...
      hi
      1. -7
        27 May 2020 09: 32
        Quote: cniza
        And also, for example, Germany refuses nuclear power plants, which means gas will be needed ...
        hi

        Well, it’s not necessary to drown with wood (although you still have to turn to Russia) Everyone needs gas, but if you get it through pseudo-states like Ukraine and Poland, there are a lot of risks, etc.
        The Germans understand this very well, but the United States is terribly pressuring them ...
        Well, for us, for gas and for special forces !!
        1. +5
          27 May 2020 23: 33
          Quote: Ciklop
          Everyone needs gas

          And preferably cheaper and in large quantities.
      2. 0
        27 May 2020 09: 39
        Welcome soldier
        they have refused from the nuclear power plant ... but they are not going to "switch off" their industry yet. That means they will need a lot of things, while schaz z z, and not later.
        1. +3
          27 May 2020 09: 49
          Well, then you need to bow to the Poles in the belt. With thanks.
          1. 0
            27 May 2020 09: 53
            Pf-e, those themselves, let them bobble, cross out, forget.
            1. +3
              27 May 2020 11: 40
              Now, if the United States also throws them, and there is always such a chance, then they will be completely fun ...
              1. 0
                27 May 2020 11: 53
                Not predictable ... it's like who won the striped election.
                1. +1
                  27 May 2020 11: 57
                  And they have elections every 4 years, so that everything can change quickly.
                  1. +1
                    27 May 2020 12: 05
                    Coming straight, straight, soon. How it all goes wrong Schaub is very clear.
                    1. -2
                      27 May 2020 12: 30
                      That's for sure, they go on the brink of civil war ...
                      1. +2
                        27 May 2020 12: 36
                        It is difficult to say ... their system is already federal, it should, theoretically, be distinguished by stability with such a mixed mix of different states ....
                      2. 0
                        27 May 2020 12: 50
                        It really hurts a lot of political ambitions among the elites of different states and a lot of distrust towards the center ...
                      3. +1
                        27 May 2020 12: 59
                        If you listen to Zlobin, some others ... there is a CENTER, very many have never considered such and never! But ambition ... in different ways. there is generally a big political commotion going on! We, from the side, just wonder and remain ... well, you can twist a finger at the temple fool
                      4. 0
                        27 May 2020 13: 18
                        Zlobin and others are working for money. The main thing is for them to sell their product ... and let them figure it out themselves.
                      5. +1
                        27 May 2020 13: 30
                        We, on the other hand, are hardly more aware of their internal affairs. We, somehow, can evaluate the actions and the result outside, in the vicinity of us .... and what the Yankees really have in mind, we don’t even want to understand. They’re just different, we don’t care about their troubles, from the definition at all.
                      6. 0
                        27 May 2020 13: 40
                        Here I am of the same opinion, let them breed themselves further ...
                      7. 0
                        27 May 2020 13: 55
                        Shaw for business? I was informed that all the guys with "wide shoulder straps" are being harassed \ count they are worn out at the root ??? For sho?
          2. +3
            27 May 2020 11: 37
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            Well, then you need to bow to the Poles in the belt.

            Poland wants to become an alternative to Germany in the EU for a long time and in gas distribution in particular. Her actions in this direction are logical. How come? ”“ Who knows.
            Quote: unaha
            ... business will prefer cheaper gas. And it will turn out to be piped or liquefied ....

            and if you add a political component to this, then ....
          3. +2
            27 May 2020 11: 38
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            Well, then you need to bow to the Poles in the belt. With thanks.

            Do not wait ...
          4. +7
            27 May 2020 23: 37
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            then you need to bow to the Poles in the belt

            There is nothing for us to bow to them. Nothing at all.
        2. 0
          27 May 2020 11: 46
          Quote: rocket757
          Welcome soldier
          they have refused from the nuclear power plant ... but they are not going to "switch off" their industry yet. That means they will need a lot of things, while schaz z z, and not later.

          Good afternoon Victor.!
          Germany, a country with great potential, no matter how it was plundered by indemnities and all sorts of prohibitions .. The main thing is that Russia and Germany will not pit us again hi .. Enough for us to fight for the joy of the Anglo-Saxons and others .. It's time to take revenge !!!!
          1. +1
            27 May 2020 12: 00
            Quote: Ciklop
            The main thing is that Russia and Germany do not pit us again

            In the geyrop, now it’s so muddy ...
            The main thing is that by confrontation with Russia, Germany CANNOT solve any of its problems, but it will once again scoop up the most, the most ...!
            Schaub there did not talk about the Fuhrer, he, at the expense of the eastern lands, wanted to solve specific problems of his newly formed empire !!! The arrogant, from the islands, pushed in that direction, this is necessary, but the meaning for the "new-born emperor" was the most prosaic, RESOURCES, for further plans to conquer .... everything and everyone!
          2. 0
            27 May 2020 18: 47
            Enough of us to fight for the joy of the Anglo-Saxons


            Angles and Saxons are the most Germanic tribes. Jutland Peninsula. This is why the era, after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, is called the "German world".

            By the way, the ethnic Germans are still the majority of the population in the United States. More English or Spanish.
    2. +1
      27 May 2020 09: 59
      Quote: rocket757
      To everyone who has industry, gas will be needed, and not a little, as well as oil and other other raw materials.

      Gas consumption only increases, but does not decrease.
      1. +2
        27 May 2020 10: 34
        The shutdown of industry due to a pandemic, the economic crisis in general, a warm winter, and the attacks of "green mold" affect the consumption of resources, this is understandable, but this is not forever.
        1. +2
          27 May 2020 11: 59
          Quote: rocket757
          Warm winter, and swoops of "green mold" affect the consumption of resources, this is understandable, but this is not forever.

          This is true until winter has been canceled.
          1. +1
            27 May 2020 12: 06
            The crisis, too, is still in a position to and fro! We will see.
      2. -3
        27 May 2020 11: 57
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Gas consumption only increases, but does not decrease.

        Enough gas for everyone! While the alternative is not invented, so there is a selection to whom it is more important and who respects Russia (funny commented ..)))
        Well, my opinion is already clumsy ..
      3. +5
        27 May 2020 23: 39
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Gas consumption only increases, but does not decrease.

        All is correct. Therefore, gas demand will increase. And Germany is more profitable to buy gas from Russia, but not from the United States.
  4. -5
    27 May 2020 08: 09
    Eh, well, they (the Europeans) will not go anywhere, albeit not in such volumes, they will still buy Russian gas, by the way, and Gazprom does not want to gasify as much as possible, what has not yet been gasified in Russia ??? Not by draconian measures .
    1. +2
      27 May 2020 08: 39
      Soon the industry will start operating at full speed, and winter is not always warm ...
      1. -6
        27 May 2020 09: 40
        Quote: cniza
        Soon the industry will start operating at full speed, and winter is not always warm ...

        The Germans are not so stupid, I hope the Nord Stream pipe will make them more independent from the USA, etc. It would be time for us to unite with the Germans against the predatory policy of the USA, etc. (I will not write who exactly))))
        1. +5
          27 May 2020 10: 42
          Quote: Ciklop
          The Germans are not so stupid, I hope

          Far from being stupid. He just wants to stand at the gate. Yesterday, the Polish section of Yamal-Europe earned as a physical reverse from Germany, before that there was a virtual reverse (as an example for the 3rd quarter of 2019) -! Over the nine months of this year, Russian gas supplies to Poland fell by 21% - to 6,29 billion cubic meters , PGNiG reported yesterday. At the same time, the Polish state company indicated that LNG imports grew by 27% to 2,48 billion cubic meters ... for example, from January to September, gas deliveries from Europe showed the largest increase. They grew three times - from 685 million cubic meters to 2,1 billion ... "Physically, this is Russian gas that goes through Poland to Germany through the Yamal-Europe gas pipeline," says the deputy director of the NESF. - And this is pure virtual reversal. On paper. There is no physical flow in the opposite direction. ” The expert’s words confirm the data of the ENTSOG platform, which is a network of European gas transmission system operators. In the past and this year, the difference between the volumes supplied from the Belarusian to the Polish section of the Yamal-Europe gas pipeline from January to September amounted to 800 million cubic meters. But at the exit from Poland to Germany, it exceeded 2,5 billion cubic meters.!: Https://eadaily.com/en/news/2019/11/15/revers-v-pomoshch-kak-polsha-ot-rossiyskogo -gaza-otkazyvaetsya. The Poles say they are cutting gas purchases from Russia, but they are buying it from the Germans, but where did the gas come from the Germans ....
        2. +5
          27 May 2020 12: 00
          Quote: Ciklop
          Germans are not so stupid

          It’s for sure who who, and the Germans were never stupid.
          1. 0
            27 May 2020 13: 05
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Quote: Ciklop
            Germans are not so stupid

            It’s for sure who who, and the Germans were never stupid.

            Now, if not for the old woman Merkel, the "former" head of the GDR association "Friendship with the USSR" .. Betrayed Kolya, who raised her in the echelons of power negative
            The Germans owe us a lot, but we don’t require indemnities, but just understanding that again everything can happen again .. soldier
          2. -2
            27 May 2020 13: 20
            Quote: tihonmarine
            who who, and the Germans were never stupid.

            Only the Anglo-Saxons started two world wars with their hands, and then they lowered them with contributions. And today smart Germany is on a short "strict" leash with them. And so not ... not stupid laughing
            1. 0
              27 May 2020 20: 19
              Quote: Hagen
              And today smart Germany is on a short "strict" leash with them. And so not ... not stupid

              There was no need to fight. The USSR won the war, and the Allies took everything into their own hands.
              1. 0
                27 May 2020 20: 28
                Quote: tihonmarine
                There was no need to fight

                Too shy to ask, who did not have to fight? You already specify your idea, please.
        3. +4
          27 May 2020 23: 41
          Quote: Ciklop
          I hope the Nord Stream pipe will make them more independent from the USA

          But this is unlikely ...
          They are not destined to become independent from the USA in the near future. Yes
    2. +3
      27 May 2020 10: 18
      Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
      Eh heh, well, they (Europeans) will not go anywhere, albeit not in such volumes, they will still buy Russian gas

      The question is not in the fact of the purchase, but in the profitability of the projects. And here the most important is the sales volume. If it turns out that there is little gas pumped, then the money for SP-2 is simply thrown into the wind (as has already happened with the Power of Siberia).
  5. +1
    27 May 2020 08: 18

    Now it’s clear throwing Old Man, at the beginning of the Baltic states abandoned Russian gas, now Poland.
    1. 0
      27 May 2020 11: 39
      Quote: Strashila
      at the beginning of the Baltic states abandoned Russian gas

      They refused, of course, refused, but somehow it was not very decisive ...
      In 2018, Latvia purchased 1,302 billion cubic meters from Gazprom, and in 2019 - 1,664 billion cubic meters, which is 27,8% more, but this is less than in 2017, when the Russian holding supplied 1,785 billion cubic meters of gas to Latvia. ... https://lv.sputniknews.ru/economy/20200220/13252954/Latviya-edinstvennaya-v-Pribaltike-kto-narastil-zakupki-u-Gazproma.html
      Yes, and Lithuanians get LNG from Vysotsk ...
  6. +2
    27 May 2020 08: 18
    Poland, as always, ...
    1. -1
      27 May 2020 08: 38
      And she flogged herself ...
      1. -2
        27 May 2020 08: 59
        I made myself a gymnast .......)))
        1. 0
          27 May 2020 11: 37
          They will never calm down while there is Russia ...
  7. -7
    27 May 2020 08: 21
    Poland is starting out.
    1. 0
      27 May 2020 08: 37
      And when was it different?
  8. +2
    27 May 2020 08: 31
    The Yankees yearn for energy domination in the world. Their MAIN "assistants" are the countries of Eastern and Southern Europe.
    That's just about the "freebie" that was in the CMEA they will have to forget FOREVER.
  9. +3
    27 May 2020 08: 36
    Poland by its intransigence plays in favor of both Nord Stream


    That's why shout about it, let them pan ...
  10. 0
    27 May 2020 08: 42
    Come on ... they shit on their business, If the Euro-Atlantic party is stronger than the Euro-Asian ...
  11. -6
    27 May 2020 08: 43
    SP-2 is just a check, checkmate is Power of Siberia-2, which will connect the European and Asian gas pipelines of Russia, after which it will be possible to regulate the level of gas supply to the EU and China, depending on their behavior and prices, by pressing a button bully
    1. +5
      27 May 2020 10: 20
      Quote: Operator
      SP-2 is just a check, checkmate is Power of Siberia-2, which will connect the European and Asian gas pipelines of Russia, after which it will be possible to regulate the level of gas supply to the EU and China, depending on their behavior and prices, by pressing a button bully

      But nothing that the US is ahead of Russia in energy supplies to China ?!
      1. -3
        27 May 2020 11: 16
        You rave - Russian and American oil supplies to China differ by more than an order of magnitude:
        TASS, March 18, 2020. Russia became the largest oil exporter to China from countries outside OPEC in 2019, with an average supply level of 1,6 million barrels per day. This is stated in the weekly report of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy. In 2019, oil exports from the United States to China decreased to 133 thousand barrels per day.

        After the introduction of a 25 percent duty on US coal, China's US imports fell below the plinth. Now the main suppliers of coal to China are Australia and Russia.

        Gas to China is mainly supplied by Australia, Qatar, Turkmenistan and Russia (Power of Siberia, Sakhalin and Yamal). The USA is not there.
        1. +3
          27 May 2020 11: 54
          Quote: Operator
          You rave - Russian and American oil supplies to China differ by more than an order of magnitude:
          TASS, March 18, 2020. Russia became the largest oil exporter to China from countries outside OPEC in 2019, with an average supply level of 1,6 million barrels per day. This is stated in the weekly report of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy. In 2019, oil exports from the United States to China decreased to 133 thousand barrels per day.

          After the introduction of a 25 percent duty on US coal, China's US imports fell below the plinth. Now the main suppliers of coal to China are Australia and Russia.

          Gas to China is mainly supplied by Australia, Qatar, Turkmenistan and Russia (Power of Siberia, Sakhalin and Yamal). The USA is not there.

          Sorry, I wrote the phrase in "present tense" while referring to the results of the February agreement between China and the United States, according to which China pledged to increase imports from the United States by $ 200 billion, and this mainly concerns energy resources.
          1. -3
            27 May 2020 14: 39
            When it builds up (against the backdrop of American attempts to sue and rob China through the coronavirus), then write.

            In the meantime, China has a huge choice between expensive LNG from Australia, Qatar, Sakhalin and Yamal and cheap pipeline gas from Turkmenistan and Siberia. Plus, cheap oil and coal from Russia.
            1. 0
              27 May 2020 16: 29
              Quote: Operator
              Plus, cheap oil and coal from Russia.

              free! At a loss!
              1. -1
                27 May 2020 16: 52
                But you, it turns out, a connoisseur of the cost of Russian oil - share your innermost knowledge laughing
                1. +1
                  27 May 2020 16: 53
                  Quote: Operator
                  But you, it turns out, a connoisseur of the cost of Russian oil - share your innermost knowledge

                  except VO do not read anything? laughing
    2. 0
      27 May 2020 11: 51
      Quote: Operator
      ..after which it will be possible at the touch of a button to regulate the level of gas supply to the EU and China depending on their behavior and prices

      that is why, from such attempts, China is trying to get rid of:
      2018 year Chinese imports:
      1) Russia - $ 37,9 billion (15,8% of the total volume of imported crude oil to China);
      2) Saudi Arabia - $ 29,7 billion (12,4%);
      3) Angola - $ 24,9 billion (10,4%);
      4) Iraq - $ 22,4 billion (9,4%);
      5) Oman - $ 17,3 billion (7,2%);
      6) Brazil - $ 16,2 billion (6,8%);
      7) Iran - $ 15 billion (6,3%);
      8) Kuwait - $ 11,9 billion (5%) and further, in descending order.
      The innovation of Chinese oil and LNG imports in 2018 was the increase in purchases from the United States. Among the fastest growing crude oil suppliers to China are:
      1) Libya - an increase of 248,1% since 2017;
      2) USA - an increase of 112,8%;
      3) Malaysia - an increase of 79,9%;
      4) Congo - an increase of 76,7%;
      5) Brazil - an increase of 76,6%;
      6) Kuwait - an increase of 67,8%;
      7) Iraq - an increase of 62,3%;
      8) UAE - an increase of 60,8%;
      9) Russia - an increase of 58,6% and further, in decreasing order.
      So this is 2018! Nobody wants to be addicted to your "button"!
      Pay attention to the place of Russia in gas supply China
      1. -3
        27 May 2020 14: 36
        Pay attention to the calendar - 2020 is on it. laughing
        1. +2
          27 May 2020 16: 28
          Quote: Operator
          Pay attention to the calendar - 2020 is on it.

          Do you think the trend has reversed?
          Well, just too lazy to see for 2019, then read:
          Natural gas production in China in 2019 reached 173,3 billion m3. Annual natural gas production in China has increased by more than 10 billion m3 / year over 3 years. The newly confirmed gas reserves in the country in 2019 reached 1,4 trillion m3, which is 68% more than in 2018.
          It was 2020 China plans to increase oil production to 200 million tons / year, gas - up to 360 billion m3 / year.
          With the goal of China to increase the share of gas consumption to 10% (360 billion cubic meters per year), in 2019 demand amounted to about 305,9 billion cubic meters. Gas supply - 315,2 billion cubic meters, surplus gas 9,7 billion.
          In 2020, demand will increase to 335 billion cubic meters, but the supply will be 344,6 billion - again will be higher.
          This excess, 9 billion, will double the amount that Gazprom intends to deliver via the Power of Siberia pipeline in 2020 (5 billion cubic meters).
          In 2020, Kazakhstan reduced, at the request of China, gas exports to China by 12-15%.
          Chinese state-owned company China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (Sinopec) will sign a $ 18 billion contract with US-based Cheniere Energy for the supply of liquefied gas, with deliveries starting in 2023.
          China will build LNG terminals to receive and regasify liquid fuels. The total cost of a long-term contract for the supply of liquefied natural gas for Beijing will be $ 21 billion. laughing
          Objective data will not convince you anyway, "hurray" and caps in the air - it's easier laughing
          1. -2
            27 May 2020 16: 51
            "They start, lower them, raise them" - that's when this happens, then you will throw your cap.
            1. +1
              27 May 2020 16: 52
              Quote: Operator
              "They start, lower them, raise them" - that's when this happens, then you will throw your cap.

              the process is on, you do not want to see it. China is realizing its plans. Too lazy with the numbers of 2020 to prove it request
  12. -6
    27 May 2020 08: 56
    The non-commissioned officer widow carved herself again. You can’t escape fate - the wheel of Polish genotyb is launched.
  13. -2
    27 May 2020 09: 21
    Congratulations to the Poles.
    Cheap gas is now not about you.
    It remains the case for small, invite Santa Claus.
    1. 0
      27 May 2020 18: 58
      Congratulations to the Poles.
      Cheap gas is now not about you.


      At a hub in Denmark gas for $ 54, in Austria for 56. Buy, I don’t want ..... So cheap gas is exactly about them. And if you did a reverse on the pipe, then the hour is uneven and in Belarus they will start selling ...
  14. +4
    27 May 2020 10: 12
    Unfortunately, half of the capacity of any gas pipeline passing through the territory of the European Union, according to European rules, should remain free for other companies that would also want to use this pipe. But this norm does not apply to the Nord Stream,

    It does not apply because it was put into operation before 2019. And all "pipes" put into operation later, according to the EEC gas directive, are already covered.
  15. -4
    27 May 2020 10: 47
    Quote: ZaharoFFFF
    The non-commissioned officer widow carved herself again. You can’t escape fate - the wheel of Polish genotyb is launched.

    Kremlebots as harbingers of trouble, as soon as you get into the topic, consider everything means somewhere the great monaggers have managed again. And again, the failures of the hand-assed and headless present the electoral mass as another breakthrough or jerk! laughing



    1. +2
      27 May 2020 12: 20
      in reality, stupid articles
      1. +1
        28 May 2020 07: 59
        I agree with you. Articles are stupid and illiterate, as well as the commentator himself. Another rocker-hamster. Sofa fighter.
  16. +1
    27 May 2020 11: 19
    Poles play their game ...
    1. +3
      27 May 2020 12: 11
      I would know the ransom ...
    2. +17
      27 May 2020 18: 15
      Quote: Pvi1206
      Poles play their game ...

      They do not have any game of their own. Their whole "game" is advice from Washington. Poland in the European Union lobbies and defends the interests of Americans.
  17. +2
    27 May 2020 12: 10
    Quote: "... the gas pipe goes to the German border, where it falls under the responsibility of the German operator Gascade ..." End of quote.
    How does it happen with modern Russians that the "pipe" goes to the "German" border, but gets to the "German" operator?
    Germans are all foreigners who do not speak Russian (ie "dumb").
  18. 0
    27 May 2020 13: 57
    Quote: kjhg
    to deprive Russia of the possibility of political influence on Ukraine and Belarus, leaving her the role of the actual economic donor of these countries.

    Or, or, otherwise it is crazy even for the Germans.
    Quote: kjhg
    Among the main ones:

    Among the main ones, the Germans are getting rid of the dictates of the United States and its occupation regime. That will be right.
  19. +2
    27 May 2020 15: 47
    Psheki still "wake up". And, the movie, popularly called "Three Poles, a Georgian and a Dog" is a classic. I still remember the melody. When in Soviet times there were 2 channels ... At school we sat and watched. It was a pity for the only Russian (Alexander Belyavsky), who was written off in the first series. Good actor and Eternal Memory!
  20. -5
    28 May 2020 10: 22
    Quote: ZaharoFFFF
    I agree with you. Articles are stupid and illiterate, as well as the commentator himself. Another rocker-hamster. Sofa fighter.

    Lahti? How much do you sell your homeland?
    1. +1
      28 May 2020 11: 06
      Quote: Grading
      How much do you sell your homeland?

      Are you interested in rates?
      1. 0
        28 May 2020 14: 07
        Are you interested in rates?

        Looks for a warmer place.
  21. 0
    28 May 2020 11: 28
    It is high time to divide Poland with Germany. There is no such state and neighbors have no problems ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"