China is wondering why hypersonic missiles are deployed in Siberia


MiG-31 - carrier of missiles of the Dagger complex


Russia decided to deploy hypersonic missiles in Siberia. Naturally, China paid attention to this decision. Interested in such placement in China.

On the pages of the Chinese edition of Phoenix, military experts Cheng Hanping and Yuan Zhou are considering possible reasons for placing hypersonic weapons "near the territory of China." The wording “near the territory of China” itself at the same time looks strange.

The reason for the discussion was information published by the Russian military that military pilots of units deployed in Siberia will begin to master the dagger hypersonic missiles that will be equipped with combat aircraft next year.

Chinese experts believe that hypersonic weapons will appear in Siberia in order to control and ensure the security of the Arctic, Central Asia and the Far East. All of these regions will be within reach of the missiles.

They believe that Russia has reasons to closely monitor precisely these areas.

The situation in Central Asia of the Russian Federation should be controlled because of a possible aggravation of the situation in the region after the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Such a change in the situation can negatively affect not only Afghanistan, but also the neighboring post-Soviet republics of Central Asia.

In the Far East, Russia has a threat of conflict with Japan, which claims to be the so-called "northern territories." Therefore, this region should also be “under the gun”. Phoenix correspondents write about this.

And finally, the Arctic. Since Soviet times, Russia considered the North Pole its property. And if before the Arctic did not pay attention, today interest in it has grown significantly. And Moscow rightly believes that the “Daggers” stationed in Siberia are capable of protecting the country's interests in this region.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. PN
    PN 25 May 2020 09: 34 New
    • 58
    • 1
    +57
    They themselves asked a question, they themselves answered it ...
    1. Vladimir_2U 25 May 2020 09: 50 New
      • 10
      • 2
      +8
      Quote: PN
      They themselves asked a question, they themselves answered it ...
      They did not answer, but clarified. )))
      1. mark2 25 May 2020 09: 54 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        And explained - believed.
        1. Uncle lee 25 May 2020 09: 58 New
          • 21
          • 1
          +20
          Quote: mark2
          And explained - believed.

          And having believed - they were afraid! good
          1. Starover_Z 25 May 2020 10: 57 New
            • 32
            • 0
            +32
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            Quote: mark2
            And explained - believed.

            And having believed - they were afraid! good

            consider possible reasons for placing hypersonic weapons "near the territory of China"

            The counter-question is - why does China need tank armies if there are straits in front of Taiwan in the southwest of the mountain? Who are you going to fight with? With Mongolia or Kazakhstan? Or ... ?!
            1. Uncle lee 25 May 2020 11: 04 New
              • 9
              • 0
              +9
              Quote: Starover_Z
              Or ... ?!

              A very plausible option!
              1. hydrox 25 May 2020 16: 43 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Abaldet!
                It’s even impossible to imagine WHAT ELSE Chinese journalists can suck out of their dirty fingers, since they could hardly find public information about the deployment of MiGs with daggers in the public domain
            2. 5-9
              5-9 25 May 2020 12: 03 New
              • 13
              • 0
              +13
              As long as the Chinese “tank armies” get to our border from places of permanent deployment, any war will end 5 times, or just start when they are on the way .... The fact that China near our border is an analogue of the Soviet Central Asian military district. .. outback, rear and rural pastoral
              1. Naughty 25 May 2020 13: 40 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                it is an analogue of the Soviet Central Asian military district ... outback, rear and rural pastoral

                Ridiculed even my slippers
                1. 5-9
                  5-9 25 May 2020 14: 16 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Of course, much thinner both in terms of composition and preparation .... I had in mind the level with respect to their FGPA, which are deployed on the coast opposite Taiwan ...
              2. Dimmedroll 26 May 2020 19: 56 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Not really, ours will have to get the same. So, by agreement, we took 100 km. his heavy equipment.
                1. 5-9
                  5-9 27 May 2020 08: 44 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Where and where do ours get to? China has a thousand kilometers from our border troops with a gulkin nose.
                  I'm not saying that because of the terrain and geography, it’s almost impossible to attack us from them (the more you catch Amur, the more they surrender themselves), but on the contrary, it’s very convenient.
            3. LeonidL 25 May 2020 17: 06 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              As for the MPR and Kazakhstan - China, the Mongolian People's Republic has long considered and still considers it to be the torn away part of Outer Mongolia, well, Kazakhstan ... If for one reason or another, the PRC sharply aggravates its internal situation, then as an ideal way out a small victorious war and the first soft goals will be the MPR and Kazakhstan, and the Chinese "brothers" will try to do everything so that Russia at the same time can sit and only voice its formidable "Chinese" demands through the mouths of the Foreign Ministry.
            4. Revolver 25 May 2020 18: 00 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              Quote: Starover_Z
              The counter-question is - why does China need tank armies if there are straits in front of Taiwan in the southwest of the mountain? Who are you going to fight with? With Mongolia or Kazakhstan? Or ... ?!

              Also ask for what polar waters of China they build icebreakers.
              It is no secret that China considers Siberia and the Far East to be Chinese territories illegally torn away by the tsarist government, taking advantage of the temporary weakness of the "Celestial Empire." And that sooner or later, “historical injustice” must be restored.
        2. Ilya-spb 25 May 2020 12: 21 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          It is not a Chinese matter to ask such questions.

          Wherever we want, there we place it.
          1. orionvitt 25 May 2020 12: 43 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Ilya-spb
            This is not a Chinese business to ask such questions.

            If the Chinese were still fluffy nyashki, and so, no one knows what they have in mind. Nothing, now in a swara with the Americans, will be in Russian skin. Let's see how they sing.
        3. ROSS_51 25 May 2020 15: 30 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: mark2
          And explained - believed.

          Themselves with it. They are so white, no .. the yellow ones are fluffy that you don’t need to hold any weapons against them.
      2. seregatara1969 25 May 2020 11: 21 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        From Siberia to America closer
    2. Mavrikiy 25 May 2020 09: 51 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      On the pages of the Chinese edition of the Phoenix, military experts Cheng Hanping and Yuan Zhou are considering possible reasons for placing hypersonic weapons "near the territory of China." The wording “near the territory of China” itself at the same time looks strange.
      Thank you for not writing, "in China." What to answer talking stools. Is there a Chinese Foreign Ministry or is it already gone? repeat
    3. Krasnodar 25 May 2020 10: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: PN
      They themselves asked a question, they themselves answered it ...

      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Quote: PN
      They themselves asked a question, they themselves answered it ...
      They did not answer, but clarified. )))

      And in general, they are pleased to communicate with smart people
    4. Civil 25 May 2020 11: 07 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      There is no trust in an ally, a ring of enemies from Norway to Turkey and from Georgia to Japan. Especially generous Mongols are conspiring, not to mention Madagascar spies.
      1. Stalllker 25 May 2020 14: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Need to eat
      2. Pavel57 25 May 2020 15: 06 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The Mongols wanted to build a dam and keep water out of Lake Baikal. While persuaded not to do this.
        1. hydrox 25 May 2020 16: 50 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          But if the insidious Mongols, incited by the cunning Japanese, nevertheless build such a dam, then these MiGs with Daggers will fly to split it. laughing laughing laughing
    5. avg
      avg 25 May 2020 13: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: PN
      They themselves asked a question, they themselves answered it ...

      They answered, but not quite. So one could well add - do not ask “too smart” questions, you will not get “no less smart” answers. stop We did not ask the Chinese why they deployed their DF-41 ICBMs in the northeastern Heilongjiang province, bordering Russia.
      1. Pavel57 25 May 2020 17: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The goals of the DF-4 ICBMs in Russia. Like ICBMs near Irkutsk, they are not aimed at China.
      2. hydrox 25 May 2020 17: 19 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        If we recall that Daggers with their "slaughter" range of up to 1,5 km are "killers of aircraft carriers, then their basing in Siberia makes no sense, since even the NSR is outside the launch range, and the Pacific Ocean is even more so at the latitude of Sakhalin located at a distance greater than two launch ranges - and there are nowhere to catch more aircraft carriers (unless a ship model on a river laughing ) ...
        And then, you can learn in Siberia (fewer prying eyes), but you can get up to a permanent deployment anywhere in the Far East, and aircraft carriers do not go north (catapults freeze !!)laughing
        1. hydrox 26 May 2020 09: 01 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Well, you uneducated Liberdyan, are you minus me ?. Read here, enlighten, try with this coal to drop a spark of reason into your sleeping head! smile
          https://oko-planet.su/politik/politikarm/590327-uyti-nevozmozhno-chto-rossiya-prigotovila-dlya-avianoscev-ssha.html
      3. SOKOL777 26 May 2020 02: 51 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        As for the DF-41, it’s simple. China has no reliable air defense systems. The location near our borders is agreed. We took them under our umbrella. If they fly in our direction, they will be immediately shot down. A military alliance is looming here.
        1. Sergey Sfiedu 26 May 2020 20: 53 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          “We took them under our umbrella” - can you attach a scan of the contract ?.
  2. Dmitry Potapov 25 May 2020 09: 36 New
    • 19
    • 0
    +19
    For beauty, exclusively for beauty!
  3. mark1 25 May 2020 09: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And also, that Europe would not once again be brought to a hysterical crisis. Throwing from place to place is not a long business, but formally there is no threat.
    1. Prisoner 25 May 2020 09: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The hysterical crisis is a permanent state of Europe. Surely they will begin to howl about the threat from Siberia. hi
      1. hydrox 25 May 2020 17: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        To do this, it would be useful to put in Belarus a couple of inflatable mock-ups with daggers somewhere at the dual-use aerodrome (or in Lida, Machulishchi, maybe Baranovichi) and chuckle over Eurohistory ... laughing laughing laughing
  4. Mountain shooter 25 May 2020 09: 45 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Transfer Migi anywhere in the country, with their "mobility" does not take much time. Why do Chinese missiles stand in Inner Mongolia?
    1. KVU-NSVD 25 May 2020 09: 52 New
      • 14
      • 1
      +13
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      . Why do Chinese missiles stand in Inner Mongolia?

      This is not aggression, it is rather a sign of trust - they deploy strategic forces in the safest areas in terms of their remoteness from the coast and other threats and probably understanding that we are not enemies strategically. You must admit that the difference is small at what distance from our borders their strategic nuclear forces, and they are calmer in the event of a non-nuclear strike by their enemies.
      1. vvvjak 25 May 2020 10: 36 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        This is not aggression, but rather a sign of trust

        And I agree with you. Placing ICBMs in the zone of destruction of conventional (non-nuclear) weapons of a potential enemy is foolish. There are various options for such a step. For example, China’s ICBMs are under the “umbrella” of the Russian Special Forces, or a strike on missile positions will result in defeat of the Russian Federation, which will automatically force it to retaliate.
    2. zadorin1974 25 May 2020 10: 14 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      I would add Eugene, why so many PLA forces in the north of China? By the way, the northern districts are rearmament first.
      1. l7yzo 26 May 2020 07: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Campaign natural disasters still happen. Well, the coast may well flood a small (or large tsunami). After all, it floods and shakes. A hurricane is where you have never heard of them before. The seas are drying up, the deserts are turning green, soon you can engage in farming on Novaya Zemlya)) Australia can finally condole with it, you can finally understand what is happening, the car burns to ashes, and next to it there is a green tree and there’s not a trace of fire (there are a lot of pictures in the internet )
    3. AllBiBek 25 May 2020 15: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It begs that in order for Russian air defense systems to be covered up, in which case the states will hit just the mines with missiles.
  5. Mavrikiy 25 May 2020 09: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    China is wondering why hypersonic missiles are deployed in Siberia

    Oh, the next preoccupied, Europe and the US are not enough. You ask the Chinese Foreign Ministry, on a neighboring branch
    China and Russia act together. This cooperation will continue in the name of peace and stability, which today is increasingly lacking on the planet.
  6. Ravil_Asnafovich 25 May 2020 09: 53 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    In order for Chinese experts to have work, or they will die of hunger.
  7. prior 25 May 2020 09: 55 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The “dagger” from Siberia will reach any part of the “body of the aggressor,” no matter who it is.
    My apartment, where I want slippers and put .....
    1. cniza 25 May 2020 13: 09 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The main thing is that far from the eyes of the main "partners".
  8. Dmitry V. 25 May 2020 10: 10 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The Chinese guys are a counterweight to American military bases in Japan.
  9. Carnifexx 25 May 2020 10: 15 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    In China, they began to suspect that Russia is not so naive about them as the Chinese would like. I would like to believe that the deployment of "Daggers" from Siberia is not an accident.
  10. Pvi1206 25 May 2020 10: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it is unclear why the Russian Defense Ministry is reporting the deployment of weapons ... so that they start to fear? ... or is it disinfect ...
    1. cniza 25 May 2020 13: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Pvi1206
      it is unclear why the Russian Defense Ministry is reporting the deployment of weapons ... so that they start to fear? ... or is it disinfect ...


      So it’s like the Chinese said so, and our M.O. is silent ...
  11. evgen1221 25 May 2020 10: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And where do we place hypersound on my territory note, given the acceleration factor and media stability? As if in America and other radishes they do not allow our nuclear facilities to be placed, it remains to be blamed on its territory. Or not on your own?
  12. evgen1221 25 May 2020 10: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And where do we place hypersound on my territory note, given the acceleration factor and media stability? As if in America and other radishes they do not allow our nuclear facilities to be placed, it remains to be blamed on its territory. Or not on your own?
  13. Reserve buildbat 25 May 2020 11: 07 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    1. Our missiles in our territory. Where we consider it necessary, there we place it.
    2. In addition to the tasks indicated by the Chinese, one can recall one more thing: so that all sorts of “kings of monkeys” sit on their branch and do not confuse the banks. Cupid.
    1. l7yzo 26 May 2020 21: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Gentlemen, we will be honest. China was grown for a reason, its development over 30 years from obscure consumer goods to the production of missiles is no coincidence. Such technologies just do not give anyone, and you need to develop a base for yourself - and it was not born in China. And technology and machine tools. And this current, the century before last, is usually sold to other countries. And note that every cool IT company, every cool can and every cool microprocessor company had offices and manufacturing in China. What would China study, peep well, if it was very tight then he was taught)))
      As they say, we will soon find out why they raised him.
      1. NAVIAVI 26 May 2020 22: 14 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Also with Newton's bean :-)
        Labor cost. Why drag this whole gopa to the states, it’s easier to teach them how to do it, pay miser for work, and sell in Europe and other countries is more expensive.
  14. Brigadier 25 May 2020 11: 16 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    "China is wondering why hypersonic missiles are deployed in Siberia. "

    A Schaub Bulo! laughing lol tongue good drinks
    1. cniza 25 May 2020 13: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Hid away from everyone ...
    2. l7yzo 26 May 2020 21: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It really pleases - what it is.
  15. Chaldon48 25 May 2020 11: 27 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In China, the strange idea of ​​the border and where it passes seems to be somewhere very close to Lake Baikal. I wonder who drove the Chinese absurdity into the head of the Chinese, is it not official Beijing?
    1. Knell wardenheart 25 May 2020 11: 51 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      The border is where the Communist Party of China says))))
      1. l7yzo 26 May 2020 21: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        exactly,
        their border is their ambition.
  16. Runoway 25 May 2020 11: 28 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Well, no one forgot the surprise from a communist friend on Damansky Island. The tradition there is to demonstrate the latest weapons.
    And then, according to Sohu, the Russian Federation has neither a 5th generation aircraft nor hypersonic weapons, which were then scared of MiGs request
  17. veritas 25 May 2020 11: 34 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    China is wondering why hypersonic missiles are deployed in Siberia

    What is there to be interested in, China also has an army at the border with us. In general, in addition to China, there is someone to defend against.
  18. lopuhan2006 25 May 2020 11: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Are those Chinese we all fluffy?
  19. Grits 25 May 2020 11: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Nekhilo, the Chinese described the territory of Siberia - from the Arctic to the "territory of China" and from Central Asia to the Kuril Islands. And where are the Migi that scared the Chinese so much on this vast stretch?
    1. Sergej1972 25 May 2020 14: 44 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      In Russia, until 1917, the Russian Far East was also considered part of Siberia. In addition to the Amur region. It was even believed that Amur people were not similar in nature to Siberians.
      1. Grits 25 May 2020 16: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Sergej1972
        It was even believed that Amur people were not similar in nature to Siberians.

        I think that Kamchadals and Chukchi are also not very similar to Siberians. Character. smile
        1. Sergej1972 25 May 2020 22: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Actually, I studied the press of that time. We are talking specifically about Russian people - Siberians and residents of the Amur region. The latter were often called "Russian Americans", not particularly religious and prone to adventures.
        2. Lynx2000 26 May 2020 03: 26 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Gritsa

          I think that Kamchadals and Chukchi are also not very similar to Siberians. Character. smile

          Compared the indigenous people. Although the ethnonym Kamchadal is controversial, it is believed that this is an old-timer in the second or third generation of immigrants or from mixed marriage. Also called residents living in the floodplain of the Kamchatka River.
      2. Lynx2000 26 May 2020 03: 21 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Sergej1972
        In Russia, until 1917, the Russian Far East was also considered part of Siberia. In addition to the Amur region. It was even believed that Amur people were not similar in nature to Siberians.

        Since 1708, the Siberian province was formed with territories from the Urals to Kamchatka.
        Further Siberian Governor General. In 1822 it was divided into West Siberian and East Siberian (the capital Irkutsk). Since 1884 it has been divided into the Irkutsk Governor General and the Amur (capital of Nikolaevsk-on-Amur), including: Sakhalin, Primorsk, Amur and Transbaikal regions.
        The Kamchatka Region, first as the Petropavlovk-Kamchatka Special Harbor with Chukotka, Okhotsk and Gizhigi counties, was part of the Irkutsk, then Priamursky provinces.
        What are the differences between Siberians and Amur people?
        1. Sergej1972 26 May 2020 10: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          We are talking about the 70-90s. 19th century, that is, not about the modern population. Russian ethnographers, travelers, and officials in their reports emphasized the peculiarity of the inhabitants of the Amur region. They were very different both from the Russians of European Russia, and from the Siberians, especially from the Old Believers, and the chaldons. This was often written in Russian wealth, Russian thought, Herald of Europe. They compared them with the inhabitants of America, and, oddly enough, of Odessa. As I understand it, a metaphor showing the desire of the inhabitants of the region for enrichment, their enterprise. A lot has been written about the Chinese and Koreans living in this Russian region.
  20. Knell wardenheart 25 May 2020 11: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well yes, hypersonic over-expensive products will be used by the mujahideen ..
    Generally speaking, the topic of our defense in the direction of China is a dark horse. It would be very interesting to read material with analytics on this subject ..
  21. Voltsky 25 May 2020 12: 33 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    China is wondering why hypersonic missiles are deployed in Siberia

    With a good word and a gun, you can achieve much more than just a good word
  22. cniza 25 May 2020 12: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Chinese experts believe that hypersonic weapons will appear in Siberia in order to control and ensure the security of the Arctic, Central Asia and the Far East. All of these regions will be within reach of the missiles.


    They took care of themselves and answered their own questions.
  23. Piramidon 25 May 2020 13: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russia decided to deploy hypersonic missiles in Siberia. Naturally, China paid attention to this decision. Interested in such placement in China.

    From this message we can conclude. Of course, the Chinese sphincter is also not metallic, which is why they are worried. But they understand that samurai and the bases of their overseas “shoguns” are a priority for us.
    PS Pure IMHO. Do not kick much
  24. Old26 25 May 2020 14: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Starosta
    This is a warning ..! You never know ... And this is not necessarily a threat to China! Supersound and "Daggers" for any purpose can reach this region which is still stable, but if that ..

    The question is where is this “Siberia” and what goals in the region will they be able to reach. For the Chinese, yes. But why do you need a hypersonic dagger? Protecting the Arctic from basing places "in Siberia" is also problematic. The only real place is Kamchatka and Japan, or rather its fleet and bases
    1. cniza 25 May 2020 17: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well, there, and the USA is hanging around everywhere ...
  25. Antokha 25 May 2020 15: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If India were on the territory of China, they might not have been accommodated. A predatory nation, especially now, is looking with lust at our territory. They want to rule as America, and not as a strong, but decent state, such as the Russian Empire or the USSR.
  26. Old26 25 May 2020 16: 44 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Anton
    If India were on the territory of China, they might not have been accommodated. A predatory nation, especially now, is looking with lust at our territory. They want to rule as America, and not as a strong, but decent state, such as the Russian Empire or the USSR.

    The question is different. Why "Dagger"?
    1. cniza 25 May 2020 17: 32 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This is the Chinese who said that the "dagger", and so ...
  27. LeonidL 25 May 2020 17: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    An exceptionally correct decision in the case of “If a“ friend ”turns out to be suddenly ...”, and China has shown that with such a friendship as China one needs to keep the Dagger ready, just in case ...
  28. Old26 25 May 2020 19: 44 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: cniza
    This is the Chinese who said that the "dagger", and so ...

    The first sentence of the article:
    Russia decided to deploy hypersonic missiles in Siberia. Naturally, China paid attention to this decision. Interested in such placement in China.

    What other hypersonic missiles do we have that can be deployed in Siberia? Only two places where the MIG-31 is based
  29. 75 Sergey 25 May 2020 20: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The devils were worried. But like tanks in the mountains, everything is fine.
  30. Marconi41 25 May 2020 21: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In the photo Kamchatka Elizovo and there are no such missiles.
  31. Old Horseradish 25 May 2020 22: 38 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Chinasians have long considered Siberia and the Far East their territory. Where they feel at home and use the resources of Siberia and the Far East for all 100.
    Chinese Air Force worked night rocket-bombing attacks in the north-west of the country
  32. Old Horseradish 25 May 2020 22: 55 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    China has to act as an adversary of Russia in the Third World War. The corresponding prophecy at one time was allegedly made by the Soviet mentalist Wolf Messing, according to material posted on the network.
    According to Messing’s prediction, published in Yandex. Zen ”, in the future, China will become the most serious threat to Moscow. The Chinese side will mask its aggressive steps, posing as a friend and partner of Russia.
    Due to the actions of Beijing, the Third World War should begin, noted in a quoted post. China will hit Japan and Taiwan with nuclear weapons, after which Russia will oppose the PRC. https://weekend.rambler.ru/crazy-world/44234206/?utm_content=weekend_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
    1. Andrey Krasnoyarsky 26 May 2020 12: 21 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Old Horseradish, do not read the Internet delirium at night. If the PRC hits Taiwan or Japan, Russia will not lift a finger to protect one or the other, since they are neither friends, nor allies, nor even Russia's main economic partners. But the United States and NATO will not just move, but will bring down all their power on China. Second - stop spreading the tales of the "dominance of the Chinese" in Siberia. I just live in the very center of this Siberia, and so we have very few Chinese. Azerbaijanis are 10 times more. At the same time, the Chinese do not stay here for a long time, only a few citizens accept Russian citizenship (for example, in 2018 only 6 residents of the PRC became citizens of the Russian Federation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. In the same year, the inhabitants of the Caucasus and Central Asia turned into tens or even hundreds of Russians times more). There are more Chinese in the Amur region and in the southern part of the Far East, since the border is nearby, but there they are only temporary guests. The Chinese exploitation of the wealth of Siberia is greatly exaggerated. Basically, this is logging and forest removal. Previously, land was leased for growing vegetables, but now it is very rare. Their attempt to build a lake-bottling plant on Lake Baikal failed.
  33. NAVIAVI 26 May 2020 04: 36 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Photo article 31st Elizovo.
    Does not hit the headline about Siberia.
    In 865 IAP there are no dagger carriers.
  34. Andrey Krasnoyarsky 26 May 2020 12: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes, the answer is to the question "why does Russia deploy missiles in Siberia?" simple and understandable: because Siberia is the territory of Russia. And on its territory, the Russian Federation places missiles where it sees fit.
  35. Old26 26 May 2020 12: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Marconi41
    In the photo Kamchatka Elizovo and there are no such missiles.

    Of course not. The first phrase with the article sounds like?
    Russia decided to deploy hypersonic missiles in Siberia.

    Decided - this does not mean that placed. And it is completely unknown when to place and whether to place at all. IMHO to place MIGs with "Daggers" in Kansk does not make sense. In Yelizovo - you need to deploy an additional number of MIGs, and not redo those that are

    Quote: NAVIAVI
    Photo article 31st Elizovo.
    Does not hit the headline about Siberia.
    In 865 IAP there are no dagger carriers.

    Yelizovo is generally difficult to call Siberia ... laughing Only Siberia is suitable for Siberia ...

    Quote: Andrey Krasnoyarsky
    Yes, the answer is to the question "why does Russia deploy missiles in Siberia?" simple and understandable: because Siberia is the territory of Russia. And on its territory, the Russian Federation places missiles where it sees fit.

    The question is not whether or not Russia can place what is necessary on its territory. The question is different. Why in Siberia "Daggers"
    1. NAVIAVI 26 May 2020 19: 38 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      What I wrote about. Let the author state it clearly, but as in the USSR, we say one thing, think another, do the third. Although what am I. If Stone brings in a video of the work of American helicopters, posing as his ... :-)
      Or at a briefing of the Moscow Region, a silhouette is allegedly shot down by a Boeing, specifically the American aircraft EW Raiden, which generally has no armament and was removed for a long time.
      And this is Kanashenkov, a graduate of the Zhytomyr School of Air Defense .... Air Defense !!! For which silhouette recognition is a sacred affair.
  36. Redfox3k 26 May 2020 14: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In his apartment, slippers stand near the threshold, through the door - the door of a neighbor. Question: what’s the matter to the neighbor where I put my slippers. Or a rubber baton, which hangs on a hanger near the front door ... against a neighbor, definitely.
    1. NAVIAVI 26 May 2020 19: 24 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      what a neighbor cares where I put my slippers.
      Ek you what :-)
      And chegozh not remember about it, when after the overthrow of Yanukovych, someone trampled into the Crimea?
      For new slippers?
  37. kris_67 26 May 2020 15: 56 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    China is worried, Russia deployed all five Daggers in Siberia
    1. Ros 56 26 May 2020 16: 52 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Itself believed, or brought the magpie on the tail?
  38. Ros 56 26 May 2020 16: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And so that the Chinese crucian carp does not doze off, and the rest of the crucian carp, too. Let the dagger be ready.
  39. Ax Matt 27 May 2020 01: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    At one time, across the steppe in Kazakhstan there were cropped parts with a huge number of Maxim machine guns in grease and buried armored caps ... And we studied the technical characteristics of military equipment of a neighboring state - China. "Daggers" is our present fiery hello! And China too ...