NI recalled how Churchill planned to turn the end of World War II into the beginning of the Third

99

Winston Churchill, who had a reputation as a man with innovative thinking, in the spring of 1945 gave his military analysts a task that they could not even expect from such an original as the British Prime Minister. He instructed them to develop a plan of attack on the USSR.

This is written by an American expert on defense and stories Michael Peck in an article published by National Interest (NI).



The very idea of ​​starting another one after such a large-scale war was so crazy that the British military called the “Unthinkable” a plan of attack on the USSR.

Then it was assumed that after the victory over Hitler, most of the American troops would be transferred to the Pacific Ocean against Japan. And then, according to Churchill, if Stalin decides not to confine himself to Eastern Europe and moves his troops further, then there will be no one to stop him.

Therefore, the British prime minister decided to attack first and arrange on the line dividing Germany and Poland, tank a battle like the Battle of Kursk. The offensive was supposed to involve not only Anglo-American troops, but also German divisions, which the British planned to form from captured Wehrmacht soldiers, arming them with British and captured weapons.

They were going to start in July 1945, so that everything would end before the cold. It was assumed that British troops would stop on the Danzig - Breslau line (Gdansk - Wroclaw) in order to avoid an attack from the rear of the Soviet units located in Czechoslovakia. Then the allies were to demand the immediate withdrawal of Soviet troops from Eastern Europe.

The plan was, as the American observer writes, interesting, but there was one very weak point in it that not only complicated the task, but made its implementation impossible. The fact is that the British never managed to figure out how to make the Russians surrender if they suddenly did not want to lay down their arms. After all, then you would have to step further, thousands of kilometers inland of a vast country. And both Napoleon and Hitler have already tried to do this. And nothing good for them, this venture did not end ...

In general, the British military made a good plan, showed Churchill and hid away.
99 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    24 May 2020 18: 37
    They were going to start in July 1945, so that everything would end before the cold.

    One more, damn it. "Until the cold weather," Panimash! Another thing is that the Naglo-Saxons were smart enough not to rock the boat. And still enough ...
    1. +5
      24 May 2020 18: 53
      Churchill Count Marlborough of the outbreak of war and Churchill after the end of the war, these are two different people. The first real man without fear and reproach, the second vile man burned out from the inside who lost the election. War spares no one.
      1. +7
        24 May 2020 19: 11
        Anglo-Saxons in their repertoire. Nothing good can be expected from these "partners".
        1. +6
          24 May 2020 20: 10
          Quote: 4ekist
          Anglo-Saxons in their repertoire. Nothing good can be expected from these "partners".

          In general, the British military made a good plan, showed Churchill and hid away.

          And with the advent of Gorbachev, they got it and redid it. Eastern Europe is now under NATO ...
          1. +16
            24 May 2020 20: 14
            Quote: Civil
            Churchill Count Marlborough of the outbreak of war and Churchill after the end of the war, these are two different people. The first real man without fear and reproach, the second vile man burned out from the inside who lost the election. War spares no one.

            What does the war have to do with it?
            Churchill - the most classic English politician
            He who was not a radical in his youth — he does not have a heart;

            This is his quote. Churchill changed parties like gloves. For the sake of the political moment.
            He didn't become "vile", he always was. There was just a different political situation before.
        2. -68
          24 May 2020 20: 27
          And communists like angels did not supply North Korea and Vietnam?
          1. +17
            24 May 2020 20: 30
            What is this for?
            1. +21
              24 May 2020 20: 45
              quit
              Quote: bk0010
              What is this for?

              Yes, he himself does not know, it was necessary something to the fan
        3. -75
          24 May 2020 20: 40
          Because the Anglo-Saxons are judged according to one plan, one Churchill.

          And about how the Communists drove thousands of pieces of military equipment to Vietnam or Korea, this is normal.
          The post-war future showed that Churchill was right in his beliefs, the Communists did not calm down and no millions of victims could stop them.
          They set North Korea on South Korea, set the CCP on the Kuomintang, set North Vietnam on South. Provoking wars over and over again.


          Kennedy could have vaporized the entire Union in '62, had the Anglo-Saxons been so bloodthirsty this would have happened.
          1. +23
            24 May 2020 20: 54
            And here is another odious "Fighter for Truth". Do you work out cookies? Here Courier citizens of the gears and then behave more modestly.
            1. +21
              24 May 2020 21: 06
              Quote: zadorin1974
              Do you work out cookies?

              These specimens are extremely interesting from a medical point of view. After all, what kind of deviations do you need to have in order to block such an inhuman plan of such a treacherous blow to your own ancestors, who at that time were already sipping beyond measure?
          2. +23
            24 May 2020 21: 11
            Quote: Courier
            Because the Anglo-Saxons are judged according to one plan, one Churchill.

            Not only. Do not forget about the plans for nuclear bombing of the USSR - Totality, Chariotir, Dropshot and others.

            Quote: Courier
            And about how the Communists drove thousands of pieces of military equipment to Vietnam or Korea, this is normal.
            The post-war future showed that Churchill was right in his beliefs, the Communists did not calm down and no millions of victims could stop them.
            They set North Korea on South Korea, set the CCP on the Kuomintang, set North Vietnam on South. Provoking wars over and over again.

            The regimes of Li Son Man and Ngo Dinh Ziem of the Communists were shot in batches. For that fought for it and ran.

            Quote: Courier
            Kennedy could have vaporized the entire Union in '62, had the Anglo-Saxons been so bloodthirsty this would have happened.

            Could, though the USSR would have evaporated the United States. And Western Europe for one.
          3. +9
            24 May 2020 21: 13
            In your case, medicine is powerless. Only in the morgue.
          4. +15
            25 May 2020 06: 17
            Quote: Courier
            Because the Anglo-Saxons are judged according to one plan, one Churchill.

            No, there are more than 300 years of war crimes, compared to which even the German "SS" rests
            The post-war future showed that Stalin was right in his beliefs, the capitalists did not calm down and no millions of victims could stop them.
            Set South Korea on the DPRK, set the Kuomintang on the CCP, set South Vietnam on the North. Provoking wars over and over again.

            So rather laughing
            Khrushchev could evaporate the entire "West" in 62, if the communists were so bloodthirsty, it would have happened
            Now right hi
          5. +3
            25 May 2020 11: 04
            Quote: Courier
            They set North Korea on South Korea, set the CCP on the Kuomintang, set North Vietnam on South.

            )))) Read the story carefully before writing this nonsense. Even as your version for ears can be pulled about Korea and Vietnam, then about the CCP and the Kuomintang utter nonsense.
        4. -10
          25 May 2020 03: 57
          I wonder what you know about the repertoire of the Saxons or the British
          1. +18
            25 May 2020 07: 27
            Quote: ApJlekuHo
            I wonder what you know about the repertoire of the Saxons or the British

            Genocide, millions of slaves, concentration camps, British East India Company, Opium Wars. Indeed, what we know about their repertoire ... lol
      2. +6
        24 May 2020 19: 27
        Winston Churchill did not have the right to bear the title of Duke of Marlborough, as he was the youngest son in the family
      3. +15
        24 May 2020 19: 34
        Quote: Civil
        Churchill Count Marlborough of the outbreak of war and Churchill after the end of the war, these are two different people. The first real man without fear and reproach

        What are you talking about? Wait until the opponents wear out each other, then attack at the head of the troops gathered from all dependent countries, and with their fresh strength, or better simply by demonstrating it, force both to their conditions. This old "good" Anglo-Saxon tradition, even at the beginning of the Second World War, was for the Britons a plan for further action, and Churchill, as a man of "conservative" views, dreamed of from the very beginning. Delays with the opening of the second front, delays with lend-lease and much more were subordinated to this. It even slips in his memoirs. But this time, it didn't work out. During the confrontation, one of the sides gained so much strength that it was very scary and even stupid to rock the boat against it.
        1. +21
          24 May 2020 19: 54
          Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
          One of the parties in the course of the confrontation gained so much strength that it was very scary and even stupid to pry against it.

          That's right, colleague! At the time of Victory, our army was the most efficient in the world! The author forgot to mention one more nuance, this is Churchill's request to Roosevelt for the latter to use atomic weapons against the Union. Roosevelt prudently refused.
        2. +3
          24 May 2020 21: 05
          Good Boris N. The naglichans were bewildered for several reasons. In the Ardennes, the Germans did not roll allies into a pancake just because Zhukov had to launch an offensive under unfavorable conditions for us (under the tearful pleas of the Americans). There were several clashes between us and the allies (lice check ), where we piled on to our colleagues, we let everyone down on the brakes. Well, the famous parade of the IS-3 battalion
          1. +6
            24 May 2020 23: 22
            Quote: zadorin1974
            Well

            There is a lot to add here. The power and scope of our final operations were also supposed to show the "allies" what awaited them in the event of a victory for power over common sense. They landed in order to be the first to take Berlin.
          2. +4
            25 May 2020 02: 23
            Quote: zadorin1974
            launch an offensive under unfavorable conditions for us (under the tearful pleas of the Americans)

            No, actually. Just under the tearful pleas of Churchill, NOT Americans.
      4. +8
        24 May 2020 20: 21
        Quote: Civil
        Churchill Count Marlborough of the outbreak of war and Churchill after the end of the war, these are two different people.

        Well, like the last head of the empire "over which the sun does not set." In the modern sense - leaked polymers bully And now the company has phantom pains. The Rockfeiler has long held Rothschild behind Faberge, with a special American twist
      5. +10
        24 May 2020 20: 44
        Quote: Civil
        The first real man without fear and reproach

        well, the paladin of honor is straightforward, and I just want to let a stingy man's tears, well, for some reason, the hand is looking for a hammer to cut into the kumpol of this "without fear and reproach"
        ps what do you think this was doing in the Boer War?
      6. 5-9
        +1
        25 May 2020 10: 10
        Yes, not only the elections, in fact WWII Britain lost, with a formal presence in the composition of the winners. The USA and the USSR won, which became superpowers, and the Empire collapsed (collapsed by joint efforts) ...
    2. -5
      25 May 2020 03: 55
      Another thing is that the arrogant Saxons had the mind not to rock the boat. And still enough ...


      Duck they once drunk half the world, they dividends for their eyes, no? Or do you say hello to friends in LONDON
    3. +2
      25 May 2020 09: 00
      Now information has gone that it’s not just in July, but on July 1. Moreover, the Americans decided not to keep things up to date, since Roosevelt would not have taken this adventure, but simply substituted for a retaliatory strike. But on June 28, Soviet troops began to move and began to change their deployment, radically changing British plans, after which they were canceled.
  2. +4
    24 May 2020 18: 42
    laughing Well, he got angry — Dunkirk’s miracle wouldn’t work, otherwise On these days, French Prime Minister Raynaud phoned his colleague Churchill in London and shouted into the phone in desperation: “We are broken! We are completely broken! ” laughing
    1. +1
      24 May 2020 20: 40
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      Miracle Dunkirk did not work

      Just Dunker is a miracle. And it’s quite heroic. But this is an imperialist miracle. Troops were sent to Africa to fight for their colonies. But all this was a miracle
    2. +2
      25 May 2020 13: 30
      Yes, snatched up well! good Tank strike through the Ardennes, Manstein handsome! bully I forgive him the Third Kharkov, if only to see the dangling English nerds! drinks
  3. +1
    24 May 2020 18: 46
    In my opinion, they didn’t get to know Truman.
    1. +3
      24 May 2020 18: 55
      The British did not provide the plan "Unthinkable" to the American command for review. At the same time in the USA in August 1945, as a result of the work of the headquarters of the American General Dwight Eisenhower, the Totality plan was developed, when the first atomic bombs began to enter service. Their number and production capabilities were severely limited, as were their delivery vehicles (bombers exclusively). It was conceived by President Harry Truman in order to mislead the USSR about the real nuclear capabilities of the United States in the postwar years. "Totality" assumed the bombardment of several large cities of the alleged enemy with nuclear bombs. The list included Moscow, Gorky (Nizhny Novgorod), Kuibyshev (Samara), Sverdlovsk (Yekaterinburg), Novosibirsk, Omsk, Saratov, Kazan, Leningrad (St. Petersburg), Baku, Tashkent, Chelyabinsk, Nizhny Tagil, Magnitogorsk, Molotov (Perm ), Tbilisi, Stalinsk (Novokuznetsk), Grozny, Irkutsk and Yaroslavl - only 20 cities. Meanwhile, the United States did not have 20 atomic bombs in August 1945. The only two atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  4. +16
    24 May 2020 18: 48
    The Unimaginable Plan did not win the approval of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which calculated that quick success in such a war was impossible because of the superiority of the USSR in manpower and military equipment by 2,6 times, and in aviation by 1,5 times.
    1. -22
      24 May 2020 20: 30
      Excellence in aviation? lol
      Did the Americans know about this?
      1. +8
        24 May 2020 20: 38
        Quote: Courier
        Excellence in aviation?

        absolutely right. You read the text of the plan, it is on the network :))))
      2. +6
        24 May 2020 20: 53
        Do you consider exclusively strategic aviation ?!
        By the way, the Americans tried to clash with us and got snotty from Kozhedub, after they said that they allegedly attacked by mistake, but I think there was a test of strength
  5. +2
    24 May 2020 18: 51
    Politicians and the military are obliged to develop plans for all cases of geopolitical vagaries. Taking care of his Britain, Churchill was simply obliged to develop his own "dropshot". This is the routine of politics.
    1. -1
      24 May 2020 19: 02
      Quote: samarin1969
      Caring for Britain's Churchill

      Churchill did not care about Britain, the result of his policy was the complete submission of the British by the Americans, what is now called "special relations", that is, if translated, Britain's vassal dependence on the United States.
      Churchill merely announced such plans; he was allowed to do so.
    2. -4
      24 May 2020 19: 02
      Quote: samarin1969
      Politicians and the military are obliged to develop plans for all cases of geopolitical vagaries. Taking care of his Britain, Churchill was simply obliged to develop his own "dropshot". This is the routine of politics.

      ---------------------------
      I wonder if such a plan really existed or was it a thrown bike that began to live its own life? And what could one hope to achieve victory in such a war? The land component of the combined forces had neither the experience nor the capabilities of the Soviet army, even if the numbers had been increased to the required level. The power of the fleet and allied aviation is also impossible to use to their full potential. To establish cooperation overnight with a former enemy, that is, the Wehrmacht, is also problematic. It is not clear what the Duke of Marlborough was betting on.
      1. +3
        24 May 2020 19: 06
        Quote: Altona
        I wonder if such a plan really existed or was it a thrown bike that began to live its own life? And what could one hope to achieve victory in such a war?

        Churchill instructed the military to make a plan, they did it. Then we discussed the prospects and that's it. There were no possibilities to implement the plan "Unthinkable".
        1. -2
          24 May 2020 19: 16
          -It was so crazy that the British military called the plan of the attack on the USSR "Unthinkable."
          Unthinkable ... VILLAGE / LYCEPHEMISM ..
        2. +4
          24 May 2020 19: 38
          Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
          Churchill instructed the military to make a plan, they did it. Then we discussed the prospects and that's it. There were no possibilities to implement the plan "Unthinkable".

          ---------------------------
          Any sane military would not even tezisno plan such an event in view of its complete futility at that time. But it is, thoughts aloud.
          1. +1
            24 May 2020 19: 44
            Quote: Altona
            Any sane military would not even tezisno plan such an event in view of its complete futility at that time

            The step was planned at the beginning of the war. It was not so easy to abandon such a pleasant plan. They convinced themselves with the arguments of the staff officers, who were instructed to calculate everything. That's the whole point of the "plan"
      2. 0
        24 May 2020 19: 41
        Quote: Altona
        I wonder if such a plan really existed or was it a thrown bike that began to live its own life?

        Churchill talks about him in his memoirs.
    3. +1
      24 May 2020 19: 39
      Quote: samarin1969
      for all occasions

      They did not, however, have a plan to capture the United States.
      1. +3
        24 May 2020 19: 51
        Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
        Quote: samarin1969
        for all occasions

        They did not, however, have a plan to capture the United States.

        ... gentlemen could well assume that the Yankees could share spheres of influence with Hitler. If you remove the Masonic ideals, then the United States with England had more contradictions than with the Reich. I admit that the Imperial General Staff could calculate the hostile actions of the United States in the early 40s.
        1. +3
          24 May 2020 20: 45
          Quote: samarin1969
          I admit that the Imperial General Staff could calculate

          You can allow anything. And if you look at the facts, then we still have a plan of attack on us. Yes, even at such a moment
          1. 0
            24 May 2020 20: 56
            Quote: Boris ⁣ Shaver
            Quote: samarin1969
            I admit that the Imperial General Staff could calculate

            You can allow anything. And if you look at the facts, then we still have a plan of attack on us. Yes, even at such a moment


            These are only facts that are published. "Inconvenient" facts are usually buried more reliably.
            1. +3
              24 May 2020 21: 13
              Quote: samarin1969
              "Inconvenient" facts are usually buried more reliably.

              This is not a reason to invent them.
  6. 0
    24 May 2020 18: 53
    At all times, the Englishwoman is the most capricious girl, and even shit anywhere hi .
    1. +2
      25 May 2020 12: 31
      She is not a girl, she is an old maid ...
  7. +4
    24 May 2020 18: 55
    Bravery and stupidity!
    Churchill is an entire era, he is the last successive adherent of the Great British Empire.
    Until recently, he believed that an empire could be preserved.
    He foresaw (and quite rightly) that a successful struggle for the independence of the British colonies was possible only with the support of the USSR.
    Therefore, he saw the Soviet Union as the main enemy.
    1. +1
      24 May 2020 19: 15
      And yet, after.
      Was the plan "Unthinkable" approved and accepted for execution, or is it just a study of possible actions?
      As far as I remember, German prisoners of war in British camps maintained their army structure and discipline, full-time weapons were stored in warehouses nearby.
      Those. could really be armed and thrown into battle.
      1. +1
        25 May 2020 12: 30
        It looks more like the imagination of an American journalist, but there were no doubts about the issues worked out.
  8. +8
    24 May 2020 18: 57
    The weakest point in this regard was that they were going to fight with the most efficient army in the world — the Red Army, which had colossal combat experience, and the British mountain warriors understood.
  9. +7
    24 May 2020 19: 06
    In general, the British military made a good plan, showed Churchill and hid away.

    The British have always been conspirators and instigators, now the baton is with the United States, but who knows, if Churchill took a chance, England might be part of the USSR, like all of Europe. In the 45th, the USSR was already the strongest and most combat ready army in the world. Another question, of course, is that people are already tired of the war.
  10. 0
    24 May 2020 19: 07
    the anti-Hitler coalition is an involuntary ally ...
  11. +2
    24 May 2020 19: 24
    The very idea of ​​starting another after such a large-scale war was so insane that the British military called the “Unthinkable” a plan of attack on the USSR

    Rather, the idea of ​​starting a war at almost a 100% chance of snatching lule in the end gave the name to this operation.
  12. +6
    24 May 2020 19: 32
    At that time, this madness could have faded only in one case - if it had begun with the atomic bombing of Soviet cities, in a clean field, the Britons had no chance at all against the then Red Army - they would have torn the heating pad like an ace. And there couldn’t be any bombing, because: 1) Americans probably didn’t get acquainted with the plan 2) The nuclear stock was not enough and the Americans needed it for Japanese goals that were much more important for them at that time 3) Again, the Americans needed help from The USSR in the war with Japan, and that was at that moment far more relevant than all the unthinkable plans. So developed and put on the shelf and thank God ... for everyone ..
    1. 0
      24 May 2020 22: 46
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      At that time, this madness could have faded only in one case - if its execution had begun with the atomic bombings of Soviet cities

      So Churchill did not have an atomic bomb. In October 1952, Britain became the third country to test a self-developed nuclear weapon.
  13. +3
    24 May 2020 20: 01
    "In general, the British military drew up a good plan, showed Churchill and hid it away." - Not only did they hide the plan away, but after the elections they hid Churchill himself, just in case, it became too toxic for the dilapidated British Empire, which had clearly lost its status and a great power and mistress of the seas.
    1. +2
      25 May 2020 08: 52
      Apparently this plan finished it off, but whether this plan was at all ... it seems to me that they had only Wishlist, and there were zero opportunities.
      1. +1
        25 May 2020 16: 46
        The plan was now declassified. Churchill had a Wishlist, the Wishlist failed ...
        1. +2
          25 May 2020 17: 35
          The first who would be against it is the USA, but they did not inform them ...
  14. Eug
    +2
    24 May 2020 20: 23
    This reality is very interestingly described in Anisimov's novel "Bis Option".
  15. -1
    24 May 2020 20: 50
    Then it was assumed that after the victory over Hitler, most of the American troops would be transferred to the Pacific Ocean against Japan. And then, according to Churchill, if Stalin decides not to confine himself to Eastern Europe and moves his troops further, then there will be no one to stop him.

    Churchill's cowardice was underestimated in contrast to his abilities.
  16. -13
    24 May 2020 20: 50
    in vain Churchill changed his mind, would now live in England
    1. +3
      24 May 2020 21: 29
      Quote: nikolai.shupenin
      would live now in england

      “We agreed to the point that the victory over Hitler seems to be of no use to us:“ If we lost the war, we would now drink Bavarian beer. ”No. Gentlemen, if we lost the war, now you would be drinking slop and collecting scraps from the master's table, as befits a slave. "
    2. +2
      24 May 2020 22: 42
      Quote: nikolai.shupenin
      in vain Churchill changed his mind, would now live in England

      They wanted to become an Aglitsky slave?
    3. 0
      25 May 2020 07: 01
      Quote: nikolai.shupenin
      in vain Churchill changed his mind, would now live in England

      What is stopping now?
    4. +2
      25 May 2020 08: 49
      Quote: nikolai.shupenin
      in vain Churchill changed his mind, would now live in England


      And who is stopping you from living there now, in my opinion no problems ...
  17. -3
    24 May 2020 22: 17
    You can’t take blogger articles in popular magazines at face value.
    This Mike Peck brought an excerpt from alternative story based on the book "Churchill's Third World War" by Jonathan Walker


    In fact, in the spring of 1945, Churchill was not up to plans for an attack on the USSR. There, the matter went to the elections in which he failed and even at the Potsdam Conference only half of the term was present. He was replaced by Clement Atley.
    By the way, he made his famous Fulton speech, which is considered to be the starting point of the Cold War, as a leader of the opposition for a long time. He will return to big politics only in October 1951. hi
  18. +1
    24 May 2020 22: 22
    Again daytime Jan ижižka showed up? wink .
  19. +2
    24 May 2020 22: 41
    Therefore, the British prime minister decided to attack first and arrange on the line dividing Germany and Poland, a tank battle like the Battle of Kursk.
    Churchill had desires, but there was no strength.
  20. -3
    24 May 2020 22: 47
    The absence of such a "good plan" in the event of an attack by Hitler cost our country great victims.
    So such a plan is better than none. Bad things happen ..
  21. 0
    24 May 2020 23: 16
    And, again, they dug up something and distorted everything.
    The unthinkable has been persuaded for a long time from all sides
    Only, I see from the comments - for some reason people are completely off topic


    Informed people wrote earlier that the plan was completely different.
    If the USSR goes to capture France, that is, it will strike at the troops of the Anglo-Saxons and Amers, then grab all who are at hand — Germans, Austrians, French — to arm with what is, including trophies, and use as cannon fodder with the English and amers.
    .
    Nobody expected any victory, since the USSR seemed to have 6 roofing felts, 9 tank armies roofing felts in Europe, and the United States - either one, roofing felts 2. And the 6 atomic bombs available to the USA then did not help ...

    It would be good to hold him back to the lamb - and that would be good ...

  22. +1
    25 May 2020 06: 17
    very similar to a fantastic story for a new film))) But I'm wondering why they were sure that they could win in this grand tank battle? That the captured Germans would agree to once again go into battle against us to certain death? And that the only problem is to finish everything before the cold weather. It looks like winter you can safely let all our military go home))) At that time, our army was more abruptly than all the "allies" put together, hardened and experienced fighters, equipment, weapons, the whole country was sharpened for war. It would just be that the USSR would become much larger and their island would become part of it. With a strait named ... some worthy marshal or general at that time.
  23. +2
    25 May 2020 06: 35
    We were going to start in July 1945, so that everything would end before the cold

    One already wanted to "finish before the cold weather," then he had to poison himself so as not to get to the gallows.
    Fat hog would also be then taken away! am
  24. -1
    25 May 2020 07: 00
    They were going to start in July 1945, so that everything would end before the cold.
    Considering Japan, which was not defeated, by this time, this plan is definitely INCREASABLE ...
  25. +2
    25 May 2020 08: 45
    in the spring of 1945, he gave his military analysts a task that they could not even expect from such an original as the British prime minister. He instructed them to develop a plan of attack on the USSR.


    That is the whole politics and essence of the West ...
  26. 5-9
    +1
    25 May 2020 09: 55
    A dreamer ... taking into account the fact that 45 divisions and 214 brigades (plus Hungarians) fought against the USSR at 40 m, and about 70 second-rate divisions on the western front, and the speed of advance of us and the allies was the same, then the answer to the question "who will win "obvious (remember the Ardennes shame) ... of course, you can hope for the Wehrmacht and the contingent that surrendered to the allies, but an attempt to remilitarize them will immediately be revealed. Well, the Yankees were somehow much more than Tommy and it depended on them where and how to fight .... and the Yankees and Uncle Joe recently decided to take away India's pearl from the Empire - India, i.e. finished off Empire .... and ... this, how to win Japan finally, without the USSR?
  27. 0
    25 May 2020 15: 54
    I wonder what could be counted on if the plan was implemented? that the capitalist troops are bending the battle-hardened Soviet people ideologically soaked from head to foot to crush anyone who comes with a sword? Oh well
    1. +2
      25 May 2020 17: 37
      Quote: milestone
      I wonder what could be counted on if the plan was implemented?


      Only a miracle ...
  28. -2
    25 May 2020 17: 15
    Is this gossip or are there documents?
  29. +1
    25 May 2020 22: 18

    yes these are two acrobat brothers
  30. 0
    26 May 2020 12: 09
    An analogy can be drawn between the Polish attack in 1920, pushing the Poles back to their capital and helping Poland's "friends" to defeat the Bolsheviks in an attempt to take the capital and between the German attack. A similar plan of assistance to Germany would have taken place if the Germans had not shown aggression against the "friends" themselves, and the Bolsheviks were no longer the same as near Warsaw, it was so easy to defeat them.
  31. 0
    26 May 2020 14: 56
    There is no need to argue with liberals. It is necessary to apply the principle of Aristotle: "The conscience of a scoundrel can only be reached by slaps in the face"