The third frigate of project 22350 Admiral Golovko launched

22 May 2020 58

The third frigate of project 22350 Admiral Golovko launched. The ceremony was held at the Severnaya Verf shipyard in St. Petersburg. This was reported by the press service of the enterprise.

After launching on the frigate, completion work will be carried out, including on the ship’s hull and electrical installation, installation of ship systems, power plant systems, and mechanical equipment. The installation of the main equipment on the ship should be completed by the end of 2020.

According to the plans of shipbuilders, mooring trials of the frigate will begin in June 2021, the introduction of the crew is scheduled for late August-early September, sea trials will begin in early 2022. The transfer of the ship to the Navy is planned in the fall of 2022.

"Admiral Golovko" is the third ship in the series of frigates of project 22350 and the second serial. Laid down on February 1, 2012. It is the first frigate of this project with a fully Russian power plant. The leading and first production frigates of Project 22350 — Admiral Gorshkov and Admiral Kasatonov — are equipped with diesel engines of Russian production, but gas turbine units (GTU) manufactured by the Ukrainian Zorya-Mashproekt company are used as afterburners. At the "Admiral Golovko" installed domestic analogue of the Ukrainian gas turbine. According to open information, the main power plant of frigates of project 22350 is a gas turbine engine with a total capacity of 65 thousand liters. with. and diesel generators with a total capacity of 4 thousand kW.

The frigate is named in honor of Arseniy Golovorovich Golovko (1906 - 1962), the sailor - the surface commander, commander of the North fleet during the Great Patriotic War. Under his leadership, the ships of the Northern Fleet participated in the defense of the Soviet Arctic, in navigating the northern sea convoys of the Allies and internal convoys, in military operations to disrupt the sea transport of German troops near Northern Norway and Finland.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Tektor

+3

22 May 2020 17: 37

On the seas, on the waves, now here - tomorrow there ... (c)
1. Pug
  
  +1
  
  22 May 2020 18: 18
  
  Quote: Tektor
  On the seas, on the waves, now here - tomorrow there ... (c)
  
  Seven feet under the keel ! And let others shout Russophobia ..
  The frigate is named in honor of Arseniy Golovorovich Golovko (1906 - 1962), a sailor - a surface naval commander of the Northern Fleet during the Great Patriotic War.
  
  Hooray Hooray Hooray!
  Next, let our fleet whine and mud over!
  1. Grandfather
    
    +1
    
    22 May 2020 19: 27
    
    what, on motors: sala to Ukraine? some kind of "politics", God forgive me ... oh yes, contracts .. contracts ... parashek sweets in sixes ... they got hypocrisy and deceit. 20 years already. It's time to dig out a new Dnieper power station
    1. St Petrov
      
      -4
      
      23 May 2020 01: 02
      
      hypocrisy and deceit got. 20 years already. it’s time to dig up a new Dnieper
      
      Something you made a mistake again, patriot. then a new ship was launched, and you react like a great Ukrainian.
      
      I’d like to figure it out to you with a squabble, an honest citizen, gardamir and other odious characters - to give a shovel, no matter what sea you dug up in 20 years, Putin’s curse, at least no matter what movement the Russian opposition wonders
      
      PS I heard about the Boguchanskaya hydroelectric station, patriot?
    2. Grits
      
      +1
      
      23 May 2020 13: 27
      
      Quote: Dead Day
      what, on motors: fat Ukraine?
      
      Interestingly, with the loss of the Russian market, does Zorya build anything from engines or is it preparing for scrap? And if it does build, where does it shove its products?
2. aszzz888
  
  +4
  
  23 May 2020 01: 34
  
  Tektor (Tektor) Yesterday, 17:37
  +2
  On the seas, on the waves, now here - tomorrow there ... (c)
  The combat song of our platoon in training ... Far 1977 is now.
  To be a frigate !!!
  1. Sailor
    
    0
    
    24 May 2020 19: 36
    
    And at 89 we sang "We need such ships at sea so that we could argue with any wave."
The leader of the Redskins

+11

22 May 2020 17: 40

Good news, definitely.
1. lis-ik
  
  -13
  
  22 May 2020 18: 03
  
  Quote: Leader of the Redskins
  Good news, definitely.
  
  Eight years on a frigate! Just fucking good news.
  1. Stirbjorn
    
    +2
    
    22 May 2020 18: 52
    
    Quote: lis-ik
    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
    Good news, definitely.
    
    Eight years on a frigate! Just fucking good news.
    
    10 years, according to plan! Now they are just letting them down ... moreover, this is already the 3rd frigate of the project, it would seem that everything should already be worked out, but again
  2. Sasha Minakov
    
    +3
    
    22 May 2020 19: 23
    
    What condition did the fleet pull from? AND? What about the factories? How tired of you bastards .....
    1. Grits
      
      +1
      
      23 May 2020 13: 31
      
      Quote: Sasha Minakov
      What condition did the fleet pull from? AND? What's with the factory
      
      Do not forget that we have a very decent backlog from the USSR. Industrial, technological, personnel. But the Chinese, for example, not so long ago could not build an efficient fleet at all. And now looking at the pace of construction of our fleet chuckling unevenly. So everything is only in the desire to build a fleet.
  3. orionvitt
    
    +8
    
    22 May 2020 21: 04
    
    The turbines are dead. But now without delay. And Ukraine, left with its turbines and bare ... sing., Shot itself in the foot.
    1. Tiksi-3
      
      +3
      
      23 May 2020 06: 25
      
      Quote: orionvitt
      And Ukraine, left with its turbines and bare ... sing., Shot itself in the foot.
      
      nor what kind of orders from Dawns for 5 years in advance .... or are you sure that they only did to us ??
      1. orionvitt
        
        0
        
        23 May 2020 13: 03
        
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        or are you sure they only did us ??
        
        Who else? That "Zorya", that "Motor Sich", were imprisoned for the Russian market, and this is 80% of their products. With the remaining 20%, let them spin. This is what the life-giving Maidan does.
        
        Tiksi-3
        
        +1
        
        24 May 2020 16: 08
        
        Quote: orionvitt
        And who else?
        
        Yes, you need to tighten the materiel. Zorya-Mashproekt is selling its gas turbine engines all over the world and by the way is not steaming, I don’t know about Motor Sich, and I don’t write
NEXUS

+8

22 May 2020 17: 43

Long build. I would like to believe that with an increase in the series, the terms for laying and putting in will be 1-1,5 years.
1. Bashkirkhan
  
  +26
  
  22 May 2020 17: 50
  
  There were problems with the engine, more precisely with its Ukrainian part. Turbines + reducer. The fact that the GTE is now on the frigate is a fact. After the annexation of the Crimea, the test bench, gearboxes and turbines for the frigate of project 22350 remained behind the front line. They built a stand in Rybinsk for billions of rubles and reproduced turbines. It is not possible to buy them. Also, one frigate of Project 22350 requires 2 (two) RO55 gearboxes. Reducers are manufactured for 1 (one) ship so far. The gearboxes will be run in, disassembled for the last time, defective, assembled on Saturn, on the stand, turned already in the DGTA M55R. And there, according to the results of bench tests, the assembly of the second pair of our own production will begin. The fact that Saturn can manufacture one M90FR (as you know, three M90FRs have already been manufactured) and deliver it to the Northern Shipyard is a completely realizable event, as well as the manufacture of a diesel engine by the Kolomna plant. But where to get the PO55R reducer, which is being manufactured by Zvezda-Reducer for the next frigate 22350 "Admiral Isakov", I can't imagine. Maybe Turborus collected it on his knee or removed it by secret paths from the Ukrainian Zorya-Mashproekt for Admiral Golovko? Because the supply of M55R kits (right and left rotation) for the frigate "Admiral Isakov" is concluded with Saturn, everything is Russian-made (gearbox, gas turbine engine, DD, etc.). The contract for Admiral Golovko was signed with Turborus. "Turborus" managed to get some of the products before the sanctions, but what exactly I do not know.
  1. Interlocutor
    
    +2
    
    22 May 2020 21: 41
    
    Unfortunately this is part of the battle for the fleet .....
    1. Bashkirkhan
      
      +1
      
      23 May 2020 10: 25
      
      Judging by the draft of the frigate "Admiral Golovko", the GTE was installed on it.
      Moreover, judging by the missing pipe, we can conclude that there are no reducers yet.
      1. Piramidon
        
        +1
        
        23 May 2020 12: 44
        
        Quote: Bashkirkhan
        Moreover, judging by the missing pipe, we can conclude that there are no reducers yet.
        
        Of course, I am far from shipbuilding, But please explain to the amateur, how is the installation of the pipe connected to the gearboxes? After all, the ship is still under construction and the pipe can be installed in the very least. IMHO. .
        
        Bashkirkhan
        
        0
        
        23 May 2020 16: 49
        
        All power plant units are installed through cutouts in the decks. Since there is no pipe, then there are cutouts. The same type "Admiral Kasatonov" was launched in 2014 with a pipe, he had no problems with the completing of the power plant.
2. Piramidon
  
  +2
  
  23 May 2020 09: 11
  
  Quote: NEXUS
  Long build. I would like to believe that with an increase in the series, the terms for laying and putting in will be 1-1,5 years.
  
  Engine production has not yet reached full speed. Bring to mind.
Thrifty

+9

22 May 2020 17: 52

The late Golovko deserved the fleet to immortalize his name in a warship
Xnumx vis

+6

22 May 2020 18: 02
Build ships! Build warships. Alive Russia!
1. Pug
  
  +3
  
  22 May 2020 18: 20
  
  Quote: 30 vis
  Build ships! Build warships. Alive Russia!
  
  Alive and we live this!
2. Grandfather
  
  -13
  
  22 May 2020 19: 33
  
  Quote: 30 vis
  
  О
  
  glory to Putin, glory to EP, glory to Miller, glory to Sobyanin, glory to Sechin, glory to sobchak, glory to the Narusian, glory to everyone!
  1. Xnumx vis
    
    +12
    
    22 May 2020 19: 45
    
    Quote: Dead Day
    Quote: 30 vis
    
    О
    
    glory to Putin, glory to EP, glory to Miller, glory to Sobyanin, glory to Sechin, glory to sobchak, glory to the Narusian, glory to everyone!
    
    In your opinion, is Russia Narusova and Sobchak, Miller and others like them? Is it bad that the country is alive, it builds ships, roads, houses ... Or is it not Russia?
    1. Grandfather
      
      -11
      
      22 May 2020 19: 50
      
      Quote: 30 vis
      In your opinion, is Russia Narusova and Sobchak Miller and others like them? Is it bad that the country is alive, it builds ships, roads, houses
      
      what? the country is alive? how to look ... let's get out of the "isolation" and go nowhere, ships ... yes ... the coastal zone ... for eight shots ... where are the roads? and where ? Sobyanin is building, in the Urals ... where? in Ekata? -Of course, in the districts ... not .... home for whom? where? who builds? on an idiotic mortgage, and at moronic interest? are you in your mind that you are so happy?
      1. Xnumx vis
        
        +2
        
        22 May 2020 21: 25
        
        Quote: Dead Day
        yes you are in your mind
        
        I, in my mind! What I wish you!
  2. Interlocutor
    
    0
    
    22 May 2020 21: 41
    
    Sugar has risen ....
  3. venik
    
    -1
    
    22 May 2020 21: 54
    
    Quote: Dead Day
    glory to Putin, glory to EP, glory to Miller, glory to Sobyanin, glory to Sechin, glory to sobchak, glory to the Narusian, glory to everyone!
    
    ========
    Grandpa Old! .... No - not glory .... Maybe SHAME?
    1. phair
      
      0
      
      22 May 2020 22: 52
      
      Valera craps wherever possible on the drome, for example. A stroke taught him nothing. He smokes a stupid man, still ... He is not so old.
  4. Grits
    
    +1
    
    23 May 2020 13: 40
    
    Quote: Dead Day
    glory to Putin, glory to EP, glory to Miller, glory to Sobyanin, glory to Sechin, glory to sobchak, glory to the Narusian, glory to everyone!
    
    You forgot to mention Navalny and Khodorkovsky
3. Nemchinov Vl
  
  +4
  
  22 May 2020 22: 40
  
  Quote: 30 vis
  Build ships!
  where excuse me ?!
  Quote: 30 vis
  Build warships. Alive Russia!
  someone cheated on you .. Take off the rose-colored glasses, - Oh please (!) (and don't be angry just compare) ....
  
  Construction of combat (primarily surface fleet) engaged in China, not Russia (!) And yes, I'm sorry that goes like this .... , but if you look closely at the approach and measures for the implementation of shipbuilding programs (of these two countries China и Russia) for the construction of NK for the Navy / Navy, without blindness and cheers of patriotism, it becomes "excruciatingly painful" (as the classic said) ...
  If you are not lazy, then just compare the pace of construction of the Chinese EM type 052D and our fr. 22350 (there are absolutely similar in type and capacity of power plants, and the bookmarking time in the construction of serial ships .... but "the exhaust is absolutely DIFFERENT") example number 1 ..... The other day, we have this situation in sufficient detail disassembled / comparedIn conversation-dialogue with user - Bashkirkhan (unfortunately, I do not know the name of this interlocutor, but I hope he was interested in cursory comparative analysis in construction approaches)
  I don't want to repeat myself (there was a long koment) but outlined in great detail your point of view for what is happening - https://topwar.ru/171437-nazvany-novye-sroki-spuska-na-vodu-fregata-proekta-22350-admiral-golovko.html .... There and example number 2, about shipbuilding programs of the NK Larger VI (!)
  In my opinion the difference is approaches / intentions (shipbuilding programs) too obvious (!)... and right up to tears not in our favor !!!
  Quote: mmg
  In a word, when they catch up with the entire series of the originally planned 16-24
  I will tell you more, - they are already even trying to convince us that they were planning for a TOTAL 12 !!!, (i.e., all three species (!) : what ?! 4 first 22350, later 4 second 22350.1 (on 24 UVP) and total 4 third 22350M (!)... the soil is already being prepared ... Well, great ?!
  1. bayard
    
    +5
    
    23 May 2020 00: 53
    
    Greetings to Vladimir.
    Has anyone said such a thing?
    Quote: Vl Nemchinov
    they’re even trying to convince us that they were planning TOTAL 12 !!!, (i.e. all three types (!): what?! 4 first 22350, then 4 second 22350.1 (for 24 UVP) and only 4 third 22350M (! ) ... the soil is already being prepared ...
    
    There really is a delay with the order of the project for 22350M, but at the same time, talk is heard about plans to build 22350.1 for the Black Sea Fleet. Most likely in a quantity of 4 pieces. In this case, really 22350s will be built 12 pcs.
    Could it be that?
    Most likely, the industry is not ready for the 22350M bookmarks, and there were only 22350 plans for them (18M) at first (in Putin's speech), then 12 were adjusted. , for Pacific Fleet and SF.
    In any case, a contract for UDC has already been signed, but there is no way for such ships without a warrant.
    And to equal China is sadness-longing. To do this, we need a powerful economy, state planning and sane power ... What Russia can not boast about yet.
    So for now, the descent of the next frigate is a holiday.
    1. Nemchinov Vl
      
      0
      
      25 May 2020 14: 35
      
      Greetings my friend, - Vitaliy (!)glad to see (!)WORLD HOUSE (!)
      Quote: bayard
      Has anyone said such a thing?
      well, in early May, I caught sight of some article (it seems to be "fleet-prom"), where such a hint unaccented but was palpated and I threw / drew this is the attention of Dmitry from Voronezh (as one of the authors, often writing in VO) .... (!) Then it will be seen ... I'm afraid for the most part this "the news went unnoticed"but I was alerted (!)
      Quote: bayard
      there is talk of construction plans 22350.1 for the Black Sea Fleet
      yes there was a short throw-in about nothing and without specifics (!), so take it seriously, I would not ...
      Quote: bayard
      Most likely, the industry is not ready for bookmarks 22350M
      The question is why? ... Because the actual quality and production speed of the M70-FRU turbines, in reality "does not reach the level of reliability" (Ukrainian MO90, as marching), or again the problems are associated with the "birth of gearboxes for the promising M-7A power plant" .... (?!) ...
      Quote: bayard
      and there were only 22350 plans for them (18M) (in Putin’s speech)
      well .... - "plans in planning speeches" ... (!) ... Here, without flaws, until it passes into the stage of actual implementation - "these plans" ... as they say, - "it was smooth on paper, but they forgot about ...", not for me to explain to you ...
      Quote: bayard
      And to equal China is sadness-longing.
      just can do it (WELL TIME ALREADY !!!)working on bugs and instead "declaration of intent", to the launch of the project in the serial construction of ships, it is necessary to take into account the localization of the production of components (GEM, HAC, air defense systems and so on ...), and the speed of their possible admission to shipyards to implement the program without disruption .. ?! Don't find (!)
      1. bayard
        
        0
        
        25 May 2020 15: 55
        
        Greetings Vladimir!
        
        Quote: Vl Nemchinov
        Quote: bayard
        there is talk of construction plans 22350.1 for the Black Sea Fleet
        yes there was a short stuffing about nothing and without specifics (!), therefore, I would not take it seriously
        
        And in my opinion a reasonable decision. If the project 22350M is not ready, then why idle the capacities - they took the pace of laying 2 frigates per year, so we must continue. Moreover, the construction program for frigates for the Black Sea Fleet has not been implemented. And the industry will be offended - they just mastered the production of gearboxes, set up machines, threw up their hand and grab everything and grab onto a new order ... Yes, and shipbuilders only mastered 22350 in production, cured children's illnesses ... And for the sake of greater seriality.
        In short, I am for it.
        And 22350M is already ready for industry, cooperation, without throwing and shoving.
        
        Quote: Vl Nemchinov
        the question arises why? ... Because the actual quality and speed of production of turbines M70-FRU, in fact, "does not reach the level of reliability" (Ukrainian MO90, as marching ones), or again the problems are associated with "the birth of gearboxes, for promising power plant M-7A ".... (?!) ...
        
        Most likely this is what. M70-FRU is a new turbine for Rybinsk, it is necessary to test as it should. And the gearbox is also a project from scratch, and you need to drive it on the stand, so that there are no tricks. And there is no project on the 22350M yet, where to rush?
        
        Quote: Vl Nemchinov
        it just might be necessary to do (WELL, IT'S HAPPY ALREADY !!!), work on the mistakes, and instead of "declaring intentions", before starting the project into the serial construction of ships, it is necessary to take into account the localization of the production of components (GEM, GAK, air defense systems, etc. ..), and the speed of their possible entry to the shipyards, for the implementation of the program without disruption ..?! Do not find (!)
        
        I have the feeling that this is what we are witnessing with the leisurely preparation of project 22350M - all the necessary components are being prepared. Once the GEM is ready and tested, you can safely lay it, your hand will be full on everything else - it’s just scaling by ammunition and maybe a hangar for 2 helicopters, everything else is run on 22350.
        I’m only afraid that all plans can go down the drain with this crowned bears. And not only in Russia. For 4 months, the economy fell by 25% (GDP) and it is not known what will happen by the end of the year and how it will affect the programs. Nevertheless, they signed the contract for UDC, they should soon lay it down, but the frigates - they didn’t lay the next pair ... and it’s not known how it will turn around. Either the coup in Moscow, or the collapse of the economy and depression, or the war (not necessarily against Russia), or riots will go ... or the aliens will fly in and save everyone ...
        In short, it’s hard to predict.
        
        Nemchinov Vl
        
        0
        
        25 May 2020 22: 05
        
        Quote: bayard
        And shipbuilders only mastered 22350 in production, cured children's diseases ...
        God forbid ...
        Quote: bayard
        And for the sake of greater seriality
        In short, I am for it.
        Do you think I am against ?!
        probably no less than yours, I would like our 22350.1 (in VI 5400 t.), were built and transferred to the fleet, with the speed of the Chinese type 052D (in the VI 7500 t.) on similar diesel-gas turbine power plants with a capacity of 65000 hp (this is why they can be roughly compared) (!)... But there, so far, one ship leaves 4 years, and we have 10-12 !!!... Russian shipbuilding traditions are worse than Chinese ?! It seems not (!) , it means the seriousness of the approach to shipbuilding programs.
NF68

0

22 May 2020 18: 05

And then you look and there will be a few more pieces "for the company".
GMM

-12

22 May 2020 18: 19

In the 12th year, they laid it, in 2022 they plan to adopt ...
In a word, when they catch up with the entire series of initially planned 16-24 units, and I think it will take 30-50 years, the first launched frigate, which by the way is already undergoing modernization, will probably be written off by this moment.
1. The comment was deleted.
2. Artemiy_2
  
  +7
  
  22 May 2020 19: 18
  
  Tired of this bullshit. There was a problem with the power plant. Because of this, such terms
  1. GMM
    
    -3
    
    22 May 2020 19: 29
    
    The first frigate from the 22350 series was laid down in 2006, with the Ukrainian power plant, and it turned out to be built-in in 2018.
    12 years old Carl, 12 years old, twelve !!!
    1. Vlad Malkin
      
      0
      
      22 May 2020 20: 51
      
      GMM
      
      For a long time, of course! But there, among other things, there were big problems with the Polyment - Redoubt!
    2. Vadim237
      
      +2
      
      22 May 2020 21: 11
      
      The construction of such ships with a coating of low visibility and, in fact, completely new equipment for Russia, there were many new problems.
    3. Interlocutor
      
      +3
      
      22 May 2020 21: 43
      
      You are confused. He was not built. He was waiting. Ships can wait.
  2. Nemchinov Vl
    
    +4
    
    22 May 2020 22: 57
    
    Quote: Artemiy_2
    There was a problem with the power plant.
    my dear interlocutor (!), the problem in organizing integrated approach to building a navy, - GENERALLY (!), and the organization of creating a power plant (one of the particulars) (!) ... !! But in normal countries, and it is solved IMMEDIATELY and IN ADVANCE! And only here they continue to lay "Karakurt" (over 18, right up to 24), realizing perfectly well that the delivery speed for them does not exceed one (maximum) one and a half sets - a year !!! Already three are "waiting in line for engines", and in a year there will be 8-9 of them. Does it matter ?! We have one year after the solemn bookmark two large landing ships at Yantar, the manufacturer, is forced "raise your voice", since I have not yet received the technical documentation for the ship project ordered by him ?! Well, cool ?! We sign a contract for 100 billion, for construction IMMEDIATELY two UDC (!), after all it is cool yes ?! But is the documentation ready for those, is there already a GEM in the metal for them (at least as a test prototype) (!), and so on, we again can quite easily find out in a year (!), ....?! Why now (!) ...?!
    1. Bashkirkhan
      
      0
      
      23 May 2020 10: 31
      
      Quote: Vl Nemchinov
      the problem is the organization of an integrated approach to the construction of the navy,
      
      I agree, an integrated approach is not observed.
3. Grandfather
  
  -2
  
  22 May 2020 19: 34
  
  Quote: mmg
  the first launched frigate, which by the way is already undergoing modernization, will probably be decommissioned by this time.
  
  alas and ah ...
Vlad Malkin

-1

22 May 2020 20: 47

Why is the gearbox so complicated if it cannot be mastered properly? Is it really more complicated than diesel engines and turbines?
1. Vadim237
  
  0
  
  22 May 2020 21: 16
  
  In the USSR, modern foreign diesel engines could not master in their own production as well as gas turbines for power engineering. With gearboxes, problems must also be of increased reliability - and quickly this is not done.
2. Interlocutor
  
  +3
  
  22 May 2020 21: 44
  
  NU is usually equipped with a plant for an engine, and not a new engine is made in an old factory. Otherwise, the Americans would have concocted our rocket engine for a long time. But no. Blood and sweat So here we are ...
3. venik
  
  +2
  
  22 May 2020 21: 57
  
  Quote: Vlad Malkin
  Why is the gearbox so complicated if it cannot be mastered properly? Is it really more complicated than diesel engines and turbines?
  
  ========
  Imagine! Taki - YES! Can!
  1. Flurry
    
    0
    
    22 May 2020 22: 45
    
    Well xs ... The gearbox is at least modeled well, calculated and then designed (from personal experience). I can’t even imagine how to approach GTD ((
shoroh

+3

23 May 2020 09: 58

Ten years as a frigate ..... I understand that Ukrainians refused to sell turbines, they had to develop and produce them themselves. But .... Two years from launching to military service ... Is there too much time? Ships are needed yesterday, and then two years from launching to service. Plus another eight years from the bookmark.
Bashkirkhan

0

23 May 2020 10: 32

Quote: mmg
The first frigate from the 22350 series was laid down in 2006, with the Ukrainian power plant, and it turned out to be built-in in 2018.
12 years old Carl, 12 years old, twelve !!!

In the early 2000s there was a choice from the Indian 11356 and 22350. Naturally, the Navy 11356 was not interested. The ship already lagged behind its competitors even in the contours of the hull and superstructure. But with 22350 it turned out too much. Initially, there were 4 (5) OCDs, and in the end, the number of OCDs exceeded 20 (Rakhmanov spoke of 26). Accordingly, the deadlines went right. It’s clear that the defense industry did not cope with so many new ones. Therefore, in an emergency version, 11356 was ordered with the equipment that they could quickly put into series and for the amount that was. And after force majeure with engines, it’s good that 11356 Indians were able to sell.
Connor MacLeod

0

23 May 2020 17: 56

With a creak comes ...
DominickS

0

24 May 2020 06: 24

Yes, a reason for joy. The Chinese have already launched more than thirty new destroyers into the water - we barely got the third lousy frigate.