The party of self-propelled guns "Coalition-SV" entered service with the Ground Forces

86
The party of self-propelled guns "Coalition-SV" entered service with the Ground Forces

The party of the latest self-propelled howitzers "Coalition-SV" entered service with the Russian Army. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.

According to the report, a batch of 152 mm self-propelled artillery guns "Coalition-SV" entered service with the Ground Forces as part of a state defense order. The quantity of equipment delivered and other delivery details are not given. Most likely, an experimental batch of the latest self-propelled artillery units was delivered to the troops, the manufacture of which and readiness for delivery at the end of last year were reported by the UVZ press service.



Recall that the 152-mm howitzer 2С35 "Coalition-SV" was first officially presented in Moscow at the Victory Day parade on May 9, 2015.

Earlier it was reported that the state tests of self-propelled guns "Coalition-SV" should end in 2022, and the timing of serial deliveries to the troops has not yet been determined, the Ministry of Defense will deal with this issue in the future based on the results of the tests.

The 152 mm 2C35 Coalition-SV self-propelled howitzer is designed to destroy command posts, communications centers, artillery and mortar batteries, and armored vehicles, including tanks, anti-tank weapons, air defense and missile defense systems, as well as manpower of a potential enemy. The shooting of the latest SAO is more automated and computerized, the howitzer can operate in the “Flurry of Fire” mode, in which several shells fired from the gun from different angles simultaneously reach the target.

The basis of firepower is a 2 mm 88A152 gun with a firing speed of more than 10 rounds per minute, which is higher than the firing speed of other artillery systems.

It is expected that separate artillery brigades will be equipped with the Coalition-SV.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    86 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +13
      22 May 2020
      good bibika
      1. +1
        22 May 2020
        I am glad that deliveries have already begun. and the experimental batch was before, at the parade, this is no longer experimental ... I wonder how they solved the issue with new ammunition. as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine. recourse By the way, they stayed there after 2014 ...
        1. -37
          22 May 2020
          Well, what do you think ?! Any establishment of a new technological process is a lot of money that can be mastered, and so not a lot will stick to your hands, of course, to the most worthy ones. So that is either ready, or already in the process; do not be afraid and be afraid
          1. +3
            22 May 2020
            Yes, I’m so calm ... why should I calm down? I just remember how someone maliciously wrote to me about machine tools and shells. so I remembered. and what’s there to whose hands it sticks to me at all with a hair dryer. but since they launched a small series, it means they were already able to somehow arrange the release. Well, then let them continue to supply. new equipment needed in the army. Msta C, of ​​course, is also not bad. But the Coalition NE is still newer and more perfect Msta. By the way, it can shoot with old shells. so anyway good. and yes. by the way. the word you write with a capital letter, and with a small one it is when accessing the set. and since I am alone ... well, in short, and you do not get sick. Yes
            1. -14
              22 May 2020
              I generally write in transliteration, and as they say, well, at least I put the commas where necessary :)
              The system is new, there is nothing particularly revolutionary in it by modern standards (if only the reliability tends to 0), but the technology is in demand and sincerely necessary. And you more "all is lost" listen; these people usually work poorly themselves, are sincerely surprised by the fact that others are doing poorly, and say that the country is shit; Well, let's leave it on their conscience: it's like women, all men, though I'm not in 5 minutes bl ** s, I mean, damn it :) I would attribute this to the Fermi paradox, but astrophysicists will forgive me :)
              1. +2
                22 May 2020
                yes I am not listening "everything is lost" request I don’t have a TV either .. for about 20 years probably. I don’t know who works there badly. They don’t interest me at all. You confuse me with someone most likely. I can’t say anything about translit .. I have never used it, although I do not live in Russia. oh well, we'll meet again i think on this site. once clashed once. so good luck to you, and health to those close to you. hi
                1. +8
                  22 May 2020
                  . as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine.

                  Are you sure? As far as I remember, Rosatom took part in the development of new shells. Ukraine in these latest technologies was not near IMHO. hi
                  1. 0
                    22 May 2020
                    sure Yes and stood next and the first orders for Ukraine went. because of this, the whole story with the Coalition dragged on. now it is free Donbass. Ukraine has never been. but this does not change the essence.
                    1. 0
                      22 May 2020
                      Not expected. I’ll clarify. smile
                      The EMNIP organization of the production of 152/155 mm shells several years ago led to a holiday with the participation of Poroshenko ... There were such stocks that production was not necessary. hi
                      1. 0
                        22 May 2020
                        God help wink (this is not irony)
                2. -1
                  22 May 2020
                  Quote: parkello
                  oh well, we'll meet again i think on this site. once clashed once. so good luck to you, and health to those close to you.

                  oh and the same for you :) True, it really didn’t work out a lot :) but there was no reason, it’s nice to see adequate, well, or good debaters
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              2. D16
                +11
                22 May 2020
                there is nothing special about it by modern standards

                Microwave ignition, modular propelling charge and barrel cooling system have at least never been used in our country. And not only with us.
                1. -8
                  22 May 2020
                  Well, technology 80, then it was expensive and no reason :) And now it is already, and not expensive, and as it were.
                  In the Navy, similar cooling systems were practiced.
                  1. D16
                    +5
                    22 May 2020
                    Well, technology 80, then it was expensive and there was no need

                    Americans in their promising self-propelled guns tried to use a laser beam to ignite modular charges. I have not heard about the microwave.
                    In the Navy, similar cooling systems were practiced.

                    The fleet has too much sea water to bother with similar sistams.
                    1. -3
                      22 May 2020
                      Quote: Voletsky
                      similar systems

                      there is nothing special to add, for we always go in the simplest way.
                      Entertaining Physics / Chemistry is like an old book :) but apparently I advise you to get acquainted
                      1. D16
                        +2
                        22 May 2020
                        we always go the simplest way

                        And thank God. Usually it turns out more reliable and cheaper.
                        1. -5
                          22 May 2020
                          Sorry, here my opus does not concern you :) But unfortunately people do not know what shoulder and lever are .... And for them my words are heresy :)
                          Well, I here judged the cons :)
                          So sadness and longing
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                      1. D16
                        0
                        22 May 2020
                        Do you think in powder charges forget spoons? laughing
                        1. -3
                          22 May 2020
                          no :) I think that people did not know and realized a simple truth-logic
                2. +10
                  22 May 2020
                  Quote: D16
                  at least we never used a barrel cooling system

                  "Vienna" 2C31
                  1. -15
                    22 May 2020
                    Monsieur Lopatov :) to whom you explain, here the bulk are either Urya-Urya or all-props :) critical thinking is not a priori characteristic of them :)
                    1. -4
                      23 May 2020
                      Why do we need a "Coalition" at all? Nobody writes about this in the article or in any comments !!! To work in real time in systems like the EU, TK "Constellation-M" ... The latter is buried in the bud .... despite the fact that this is the president's program with a deadline for completion in 2020 .... I will say more, for lovers of shock UAVs, it, as part of the EU TZ, could completely replace them within its radius of action, and "Tornado-S" and "Tornado-U" could replace shock UAVs within its radius of action .... This is a New Weapon for conducting modern war ... Alas, it is not in demand, because we do not have systems for this ... Reconnaissance and target designation systems in real time are replaced with systems for controlling our troops and transmitting orders to them in real time ... It is not clear how will the latter help to wage modern warfare? They can, if the corpses of the scouts will be provided for the fighting ... For this they are preparing our army, they are preparing to fight in the old way in the New Information War ...
                  2. D16
                    0
                    22 May 2020
                    "Vienna" 2C31

                    Did not know. The declared rate of vein of Vienna, as it were, hints that there should be something similar, but I found nothing but a forced blowdown of the barrel. And this is a completely different thing. Don’t share the link? winked
                    1. +5
                      22 May 2020
                      Quote: D16
                      Don’t share the link?

                      http://btvt.narod.ru/4/vena.htm
                      http://mz.perm.ru/products/23/534/
                3. 0
                  22 May 2020
                  Quote: D16

                  Microwave ignition, modular propelling charge and barrel cooling system have at least never been used in our country. And not only with us.

                  I beg your pardon, about "barrel cooling" is that for sure?
                  And then "10 rounds per minute" inevitably prompted the idea of ​​heating the barrel. How long will it last at this rate of fire without forced cooling.
                  And then the photo of such cooling is invisible. What is the principle of cooling?
                  1. D16
                    +5
                    22 May 2020
                    What is the principle of cooling?

                    A NNP is injected into the chamber between shots with a water-alcohol mixture and blown through the barrel by a blowing system. True, as it turned out, this system was being worked out back in the late 80s on the "Vienna".
                    1. +1
                      22 May 2020
                      Quote: D16

                      A NNP is injected into the chamber between shots with a water-alcohol mixture and blown through the barrel by a blowing system. True, as it turned out, this system was being worked out back in the late 80s on the "Vienna".

                      Thank you. hi
                    2. +1
                      22 May 2020
                      And the calculation of this alcohol mixture does not use?
                      1. D16
                        +4
                        22 May 2020
                        It depends on what color it is. laughing .
                      2. +7
                        22 May 2020
                        Quote: Uncle Izya
                        And the calculation of this alcohol mixture does not use?

                        No, they are aware that not everything smelling of alcohol can be drunk.

                        And who didn’t know, some POZH-70 had long choked on and left for home in a zinc box.
                    3. +2
                      23 May 2020
                      Quote: D16
                      water-alcohol mixture is injected into the chamber between shots and blown through the barrel by a purge system.

                      That is, after firing from the gun will not pull gunpowder, but a fume?
                      winked
            2. +3
              22 May 2020
              According to the rules of the Russian language, with the capital letter “You” (as well as “You”, “Your”, “Your”, etc.) it is written when you address only one person and use the plural form of respect. If there are more than one recipients, you need a lowercase letter. At the same time, writing “you” with a lowercase when referring to one person is also not an error, since the plural in itself shows your respectful attitude.

              There are no capital letters in the word “in your opinion” - it is wrong to write “in your way”.

              Thus, according to the rules, with a capital “You” should be written in those texts where there is a specific addressee. In such cases, there is often a direct appeal: for example, “Dear Ivan Ivanovich! Let me introduce you ... ”

              In mass mailings starting with the words “Dear friends / partners / colleagues!”, Or when referring to any other group of people, “you” should be written with a small letter. The same applies to a personal appeal to several people - “Dear Ivan Ivanovich and Petr Petrovich! Glad to welcome you ... "," Ilya and Maria! Congratulations on your wedding! ”

              Based on this, we get that in the vast majority of cases in the texts on websites it is worth writing "You" not with a capital letter, but with a lowercase letter. If we are talking about a standard text, most likely you will be contacting a whole group of people - the entire audience or part of it. A capital letter is appropriate if, for example, you write a public congratulation to someone - a user or a partner (a specific person).

              In practice, many adhere to the point of view that “you” with a capital letter is a polite spelling, and with a small letter it is impolite, therefore they always write “you” - including in mass mailings and other “multi-personal” calls. From the point of view of the Russian language, this is wrong. It is possible to oppose the logic of “polite - impolite” only with the fact that it is unlikely that someone who sees what is written with a lowercase letter “you” will be offended to the core and decide that they do not respect him in this company. But those who are familiar with the rules, stuck to the place and out of place “You” will hurt the eye. Hand on heart, we note that it is unlikely that this will scare away potential customers, but a competent and beautiful text has more chances to attract readers to you.

              In conclusion, we note that also “You”, written with a capital letter, will be appropriate in the questionnaires. According to the rules of drafting documents and according to tradition, “You” is written here, even though there is no specific address and more than one person will read and fill out the questionnaire.
        2. avg
          +7
          22 May 2020
          Quote: parkello
          as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine

          The design bureau is exactly in Tula, but the manufacturers, in my opinion, are in Tula and in Moscow.
          A self-propelled guns should be sent closer to Rostov, so that from Svidomo screech in social networks, your ears are blocked.
          1. +1
            22 May 2020
            And self-propelled guns must be sent closer to Rostov,

            I wanted to write about the same. Apparently that's why they accelerated with deliveries.
            These lovers of unrequited fire do not understand differently. hi
        3. +4
          22 May 2020
          Quote: parkello
          .interesting how to solve the issue with new ammunition. as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine. By the way, they stayed there after 2014 ...

          Most likely, after 2014, no one was oriented to Ukraine and began to establish with us. In any case, such information is unlikely to be released immediately.
          1. +3
            22 May 2020
            In my opinion, before and after 2014, no one was guided by it. And God bless her. Interesting information on the development of new shells.
            As it became known, Russian industry is working to create promising ultra-long-range artillery systems. Their basis will be the latest 2S35 Coalition-SV self-propelled gun, and the required characteristics will be provided with special shells. According to the domestic press, new types of ammunition will be able to hit targets at ranges of more than 100 km.


            It is alleged that the industry is developing several shells of extended range with different features. While it is a question of design work, but soon it is planned to conduct the first tests of experimental products.

            New shells are carried out in caliber 152 mm, which will allow them to be used together with modern artillery pieces. They will be able to use promising self-propelled guns 2S35 “Coalition-SV”, serial self-propelled guns 2S19 “Msta-S” and towed guns 2A65 “Msta-B”. It is alleged that due to such ammunition the firing range will be increased to 100 km or more.

            https://topwar.ru/168730-100-km-i-bolee-dlja-rossijskih-sau-sozdajutsja-novye-snarjady.html
            1. 0
              22 May 2020
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              https://topwar.ru/168730-100-km-i-bolee-dlja-rossijskih-sau-sozdajutsja-novye-snarjady.html

              By the way, an interesting fact is a quote from the article you quoted:
              "One of the projects of the ultra-long-range shot provides for the creation of a telescopic ammunition with a ramjet engine."
              And now we recall the recently published Damantsev's cry about a similar product in the USA ...
        4. +11
          22 May 2020
          Quote: parkello
          factory and machine tools for new shells was in Ukraine.

          ??
          You are very confusing something
          1. 0
            22 May 2020
            I never confuse ... when the production cycle was launched, then Ukraine was still a union state. therefore, the first shells for the Coalition were manufactured there. Yes and now, since it has gone into production, it is likely that we have purchased exactly the same machines for ourselves. I have been talking to guys from this field for a long time. there was a portal-forum of the Pereyaslav Rada. the owners are Russian emigrants in the USA. I remember how one "puppet" made his way there ... he wrote to me. Where on what machines are new shells grinded. but many years have passed. and now, perhaps, we have established production at home.
            1. +10
              22 May 2020
              Quote: parkello
              when the production cycle was launched, then Ukraine was still a union state
              Precisely because they are trying with great creak to launch shell production?

              In the Urals, it was all riveted. Vysokogorsk mechanical plant collapsed, now Serovsky will rivet
            2. 0
              22 May 2020
              I read what you write. I am sure that the Coalition was confused with a different attitude.
              I am familiar with those who participated in the development.
              The truth has not been seen for a long time. The problems there were not in Ukraine.
              And also "puppies" dug the Black Sea ... hi
        5. KCA
          0
          22 May 2020
          It was in Ukraine, and now it is in Donbass, although they wrote that the military is restoring the production of 152mm shells, but I think that for the "Coalition" there are slightly different shells than for the "Hyacinth"
          1. +3
            22 May 2020
            Quote: KCA
            that for the "Coalition" there are slightly different shells than for the "Hyacinth"

            There are very different shells ...
          2. +2
            22 May 2020
            I think that for "Coalition" there are slightly different shells than for "Hyacinth"

            Instead of gunpowder - liquid propellant.
            And there is no capsule. And you can not set fire to the entire charge.
            In short - nothing in common. hi
            1. 0
              22 May 2020
              Quote: Alex777
              And you can not set fire to the entire charge.

              Do you mean the case of fire in the ammunition?
              1. +1
                22 May 2020
                I mean different firing ranges depending on the power of the charge.
                It would be right to write not to set fire, but to initiate. bully
                The variable charge provides a "flurry of fire". hi
                1. 0
                  22 May 2020
                  Quote: Alex777
                  I mean different firing ranges depending on the power of the charge.
                  It would be right to write not to set fire, but to initiate.
                  The variable charge provides a "flurry of fire".

                  I understand you! Did it seem like they meant electrochemical detonation initiation?
        6. +1
          22 May 2020
          Where? They themselves were sitting on old stockpiles of shells. Last year there seemed to have surrendered their production.
          1. 0
            22 May 2020
            Quote: 210ox
            Last year there seems to have passed their production.

            At the same time, abandoning all the old GOSTs for the quality and safety of ammunition ... There are even very serious suspicions that most of the production comes down to scraping rust from old shells coming from Eastern Europe ...
        7. +3
          22 May 2020
          Most likely there will be a couple more years of trial operation in the troops to identify all the jambs and bases.
        8. +1
          22 May 2020
          Quote: parkello
          as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine

          Paladin American for sale Ukraine shells supplier ...
        9. 0
          22 May 2020
          Quote: parkello
          I wonder how they solved the issue with new ammunition. as far as I remember, the plant and machine tools for new shells were in Ukraine. recourse by the way there and stayed after 2014 ...

          =======
          Well, somehow, probably decided to!
      2. 0
        26 May 2020
        Rather, a dubik! wink
    2. +1
      22 May 2020
      The quantity of equipment delivered and other delivery details are not given.

      But I don’t need the details! The main thing is to announce such news more often.
      1. -3
        22 May 2020
        You are not in the process of war, and so far with the updated system of deterrence, you can not especially panic and systematically approach the issue, gradually updating the tractor fleet. The fact is that the location of the Russian Federation does not favor a patriotic attitude among citizens and officials; but here from childhood it is necessary to learn.
    3. +2
      22 May 2020
      Well, a serious step for the MO is a gun there with electric ignition and a variable propellant charge. The technological breakthrough is solid. The crew of self-propelled guns will have to recruit people with good brains.
      1. +6
        22 May 2020
        2C19 no less difficult
        1. 0
          22 May 2020
          Quote: Spade
          2C19 no less difficult

          But the "Coalition" will be more complicated. The presence of radars is worth something ...
          1. +10
            22 May 2020
            Quote: svp67
            The presence of radars is only worth it ...

            I put a hundred against a penny that it will be easier to work with it than with a Soviet ballistic station


            laughing
            1. +2
              22 May 2020
              Quote: Spade
              I put a hundred against a penny that it will be easier to work with it than with a Soviet ballistic station

              I bet the same that at the time of the operation of this station it will be unsafe in front, especially for manhood ... with a ballistic station, this was definitely not
              1. +2
                22 May 2020
                Quote: svp67
                I bet the same that at the time of the operation of this station it will be unsafe in front, especially for manhood ... with a ballistic station, this was definitely not

                ?
                Well, you could try ....
                In general, this is a radar speed determinant. laughing
                1. +1
                  22 May 2020
                  Quote: Spade
                  Well, you could try ....

                  I do not advise. Passed, something similar with a radio command system on tanks ...
                  Quote: Spade
                  In general, this is a radar speed determinant.

                  So I think that it’s a little more complicated ... the direction of flight, and accordingly the deviation using these systems, can be considered the same
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2020
                    Quote: svp67
                    So I think it's a little more complicated ...

                    It’s much more complicated, because you have to count yourself.
              2. 0
                22 May 2020
                Quote: svp67
                I put the same amount that at the time of the operation of this station it will be unsafe in front, especially for manhood

                You eat microwave-preheated food, doesn’t it scare you?
                1. 0
                  22 May 2020
                  The locator and microwave, although they use similar physical principles, are made differently in terms of protection ...
                  1. 0
                    23 May 2020
                    I'm talking about the effect of "microwaves", they heat everything that contains water and do not affect the "dignity" in any way.
    4. 0
      22 May 2020
      By barmaley it is necessary.
      1. Pug
        -3
        22 May 2020
        Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
        By barmaley it is necessary.

        On barmaley. Just experienced! Now they will guard Russia at the borders!
    5. 0
      22 May 2020
      Quote: Yrec
      Well, a serious step for the MO is a gun there with electric ignition and a variable propellant charge. The technological breakthrough is solid. The crew of self-propelled guns will have to recruit people with good brains.

      Well, on the other hand, it’s not enough for subscribers on the other end. Such a division will blow, even if not with the maximum rate of fire - those who didn’t hide there will no longer hide. And then - it will leave into the distance, until the answer arrives.
      Maybe for the whole life of such a product it will be his royal two minutes, but they will be worth it: the production of such a device, and the selection and training of the crew.
    6. +3
      22 May 2020
      howitzer can operate in "Flurry of Fire" mode

      laughing
      These are his words:

      And the Discovery Channel

      And we call this mode "pseudo-salvo"
    7. +1
      22 May 2020
      Great news! Glavnre so that this does not end there.
    8. 0
      22 May 2020
      So soon Armata with the T-15 will go in series to the troops, once the Coalition is finished. Let's see how the dynamics of orders of new platforms for the troops will develop.
      1. 0
        22 May 2020
        from your lips. yes to God’s ears. Andrew winked
      2. +1
        22 May 2020
        NEXUS, no, not soon T14 and T15 will go to the troops, because some significant problems, alas, have not yet been completely resolved. ..
        1. 0
          22 May 2020
          and what kind of problems are these?
    9. 0
      22 May 2020
      But this is serious! Finally, our god of war will have an advantage. The necessary things went to the troops.
    10. 0
      22 May 2020
      Good support to our gunners for fear of enemies.
      1. +1
        22 May 2020
        Quote: Ros 56
        Good support to our gunners for fear of enemies.

        Most likely, this new self-propelled gun, due to the caliber and various types of shells, will lead to a change in the ratio of tanks and artillery in motorized infantry formations and associations, because its capabilities are much greater, and we will no longer have new tank battles. And most importantly - not only Americans are thinking about the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the future, which is why the advantages of self-propelled guns in this regard are obvious to everyone.
        1. +3
          22 May 2020
          No tactical nuclear weapons will be used. Putin made clear the stripes, immediately an answer will fly across the ocean of various systems and the stripes will cease to exist. And they know this very well, and therefore rage. We will not fight in Europe with NATO, a decision center will be struck immediately and that’s it.
          1. 5-9
            -1
            23 May 2020
            Come on ... on what thread Palyak provocation "the whole world in dust" to arrange?
            Do we have in vain chtol nuclear weapons 10 times more than the rest of the world combined? Wasted money for decades?
          2. 0
            23 May 2020
            Quote: Ros 56
            No tactical nuclear weapons will be used.

            Americans don’t think so.
            The Pentagon recently sent President Trump a draft new US nuclear strategy for approval. In the case of presidential good, US nuclear weapons will also be used in the course of an attack on the United States by non-nuclear means of the enemy that can destroy the American infrastructure. We are talking about the so-called cyber attacks ... The Pentagon project provides for the creation of a new generation of small nuclear bombs. However, their creation was begun under Obama. Some experts warn that these small nuclear shells can erase the difference between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons. Therefore, their use can be very tempting.

            Quote: Ros 56
            Putin made it clear striped, immediately otvetka fly overseas

            Tactical nuclear weapons will not be used against the United States - this is not discussed at all, if only because the strategic nuclear forces will be used. We are talking about local conflicts, and they can just be used nuclear charges of low power.
            Quote: Ros 56
            . We will not fight in Europe with NATO,

            The Americans will not even ask where it will be more convenient for them to attack us in the event of a nuclear war, especially since their dream of pulling as many nuclear weapons as possible to our borders will be the main thing in their planning - this is what we and the Pershing passed in Europe.
            In general, this question must be considered on a different plane - whether we have the will to use tactical nuclear weapons in the same Syria, if suddenly our bases are threatened with the real destruction of all who are there. It is possible that Syria is not the last region where our troops provide assistance outside the country, which is why in the future we will also have to change the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.
    11. -8
      23 May 2020
      Another piece of production suitable for public relations and only ....
    12. +1
      23 May 2020
      Or maybe a bang !?
      1. 0
        23 May 2020
        Or maybe a better drink, it will be more fun. drinks laughing good
    13. 0
      23 May 2020
      Oh and fierce child prodigy, good luck, as they say!
    14. 0
      24 May 2020
      And is there information, having realized a crew of 2-3 people and shooting along different trajectories on the same target (fire raid)?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"