Russia introduces a new radar to the foreign market for the detection of hypersonic targets

Russia introduces a new radar to the foreign market for the detection of hypersonic targets

Russia is launching a new radar station capable of detecting hypersonic missiles on the foreign market. According to the press service of Rosoboronexport, the company offers foreign customers the 59N6-TE radar station.


(...) brings to the foreign market the latest radar station capable of efficiently detecting a wide class of modern and promising air targets, including hypersonic targets

- the press service quotes the words of the general director of Rosoboronexport Alexander Mikheev.

According to the report, we are talking about the mobile three-coordinate radar station 59N6-TE, which is a medium and high altitude radar and operating in the decimeter range.

The radar is capable of detecting targets flying at a speed of up to 8 thousand km / h at a range of up to 450 kilometers and an altitude of up to 200 kilometers. In real time, the station determines 8 classes of targets and simultaneously accompanies about 1 thousand objects. There is equipment for the recognition of detected air objects in the international radar recognition systems Mk-XA and ATC RBS.

In addition to hypersonic targets, it also effectively detects aerodynamic and ballistic objects

- declared in Rosoboronexport.

All radar equipment fits on two vehicles. The FSUE "Nizhny Novgorod Research Institute of Radio Engineering" was developed, and Almaz-Antey Concern for Air Defense is produced by it.

The highest demand for the new station is expected in the countries of the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and North Africa.
Photos used:
https://saidpvo.livejournal.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. T-100 21 May 2020 13: 15 New
    • 6
    • 17
    -11
    The detection range of 450 km at an object speed of 8 thousand km / h seems to me not enough. It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then 133,3 km / min will fly somewhere in a minute. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation, but then the radar / object will then be guaranteed to be destroyed.
    1. AllBiBek 21 May 2020 13: 19 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Destroyed - by what?
      Or, the only task of hypersound is to destroy radars that can detect it?
    2. Paranoid50 21 May 2020 13: 22 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Quote: T-100
      it will fly somewhere 133,3 km \ min. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s

      Does not work. And it is
    3. Roman123567 21 May 2020 13: 22 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s


      3,3 minutes ..
    4. Fregate 21 May 2020 13: 25 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      Quote: T-100
      8 thousand km \ h the object flies, then 133,3 km \ min will fly somewhere per minute

      Quote: T-100
      he will have 3,3 s

      How famously your minutes turned into seconds.
    5. pmkemcity 21 May 2020 13: 26 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: T-100
      The detection range of 450 km at an object speed of 8 thousand km / h seems to me not enough. It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then 133,3 km / min will fly somewhere in a minute. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation, but then the radar will then be guaranteed to be destroyed.

      450 km is 200 seconds of flying time, at a speed of 8 thousand. km \ hour (2,23 km \ sec).
    6. T-100 21 May 2020 13: 27 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Yes, I apologize for 3,3 minutes, then everything is fine.
      1. Fregate 21 May 2020 13: 29 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: T-100
        Yes, I apologize for 3,3 minutes, then everything is fine.

        There is time to run away. laughing
    7. Invoce 21 May 2020 13: 27 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: T-100
      The detection range of 450 km at an object speed of 8 thousand km / h seems to me not enough. It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then somewhere will fly somewhere in a minute 133,3 km \ min. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation, but then the radar will then be guaranteed to be destroyed

      3,37 min! it's 217 seconds .... these seconds still need to be lived and much can be done!
      1. Peter is not the first 21 May 2020 17: 30 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        You are mistaken! As explained to us by the foolish Donald Trump, America has developed a rocket that is 17 times faster than anyone in the world, and if we take the speed of sound as the basis for “speed,” our radar will not be able to detect it, since it is twice as fast as the capabilities of the radar three.
        So the one who will wait for the signal of this radar to press the red button in the well-known suitcase will be late, and we, sitting on the sofa, will also not have time to run to our personal bunker in the toilet. drinks
        Thank God that those who keep abreast of the pulse, in addition to this radar, there are other means of warning, and the radar itself (s) to be away from the command post and give the command to send the "overseas partner" to paradise will most likely be in time. We must also relocate them, not to paradise, but to hell. am
        1. hydrox 22 May 2020 07: 59 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Peter is not the first
          and the radar itself (s) to be located far from the command post and give the command to send the "overseas partner" to paradise will most likely be in time.

          Is this the new law of Kotelnikov :: radars that independently issue commands?
          Or have you already built AI algorithms?
          Nobel on the site !!!
          1. Peter is not the first 22 May 2020 08: 49 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            If you have such conclusions, then I will give you the prize, if I suddenly get it. drinks
            And in my comment it is clearly written that there are means for collecting information and there are decision centers based on this information. And in our country they are spaced a decent distance.
            1. hydrox 22 May 2020 14: 19 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Phew, how indecent ...
    8. Avior 21 May 2020 13: 45 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      8 thousand km per hour is 400 km in three minutes.
    9. Piramidon 21 May 2020 14: 28 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      Quote: T-100
      The detection range of 450 km at an object speed of 8 thousand km / h seems to me not enough. It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then 133,3 km / min will fly somewhere in a minute. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation, but then the radar / object will then be guaranteed to be destroyed.

      Teach arithmetic and think a few times before hurrying to sculpt your comments here.
    10. vVvAD 21 May 2020 23: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do not forget that in this form of radar "Russia brings to the foreign market ..."
      Export look and all that. We smile and wave, gentlemen!
    11. Boris ⁣ Shaver 21 May 2020 23: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Horror I love math
    12. venik 22 May 2020 00: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: T-100
      It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then 133,3 km / min will fly somewhere in a minute.

      Quote: T-100
      It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation

      =======
      With mathematics, you, Sergei, clearly "did not work out" .....
      Not 3.3 seconds, but 3.3 minutes!!!! request
  2. cniza 21 May 2020 13: 17 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    introduces the latest radar station to the foreign market, capable of efficiently detecting a wide class of modern and promising air targets, including hypersonic targets


    Just for the "joy" of the United States and the United States will look for a reason to stop selling them ...
    1. Polite Moose 21 May 2020 16: 59 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: cniza
      Just for the "joy" of the United States

      But it is likely that the market version of the radar appeared precisely with the aim of hindering the development of the p-Soviet program for creating hypersonic missiles. Type: it makes sense to develop a direction if everyone is already equipped with a means of detection (and, in the long term, defeat). And if someone doesn’t, then it is only from laziness or from greed.
      1. cniza 21 May 2020 17: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And yet, one radar without means of destruction will not help, but they have acquired a radar and in a couple of years we will supply you with means of destruction - it should work.
  3. voyaka uh 21 May 2020 13: 27 New
    • 7
    • 13
    -6
    Not specified, the EPR of the objects that this station detects at 450 km.
    Maybe this is a plane, the size of an AWACS aircraft?
    1. Taltek 21 May 2020 13: 39 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Aircraft AWACS can fly at supersonic speed?
    2. Vita vko 21 May 2020 14: 34 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Not specified, EPR

      According to the Soviet and Russian standards, the maximum range is indicated for an EPR of 2 sq.m. But here it is worth considering that, unlike Western advertising booklets, these parameters are calculated from the worst detection conditions, which in reality practically do not exist. In addition, the 59N6-TE radar is a modern modification of the "Opponent-G" dm range. Therefore, the detection range of stealth aircraft in this range is not very different from conventional fighters. For example, the F-35 when flying at 10 thousand meters will be detected at about 400 km, and not like regular 450-500 km fighters. Moreover, it is the presence of the possibility of evaluating the EPR and the trajectory parameters of the movement that this radar allows to determine the type of target with a probability of 90%.
      1. mole 21 May 2020 16: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Vita VKO
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Not specified, EPR

        According to the Soviet and Russian standards, the maximum range is indicated for an EPR of 2 sq.m. But here it is worth considering that, unlike Western advertising booklets, these parameters are calculated from the worst detection conditions, which in reality practically do not exist. In addition, the 59N6-TE radar is a modern modification of the "Opponent-G" dm range. Therefore, the detection range of stealth aircraft in this range is not very different from conventional fighters. For example, the F-35 when flying at 10 thousand meters will be detected at about 400 km, and not like regular 450-500 km fighters. Moreover, it is the presence of the possibility of evaluating the EPR and the trajectory parameters of the movement that this radar allows to determine the type of target with a probability of 90%.

        Well, you yourself "warrior wow" and sniffed the so-called military secret!
        Let him analyze! wassat
    3. Private-K 22 May 2020 08: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Not specified, the EPR of the objects that this station detects at 450 km.
      Maybe this is a plane, the size of an AWACS aircraft?

      This radar is positioned as designed to detect hypersonic missiles.
      So, when determining the range of its work laid characteristic characteristics repeat objects that it should detect.
      Consequently, the given figure of 450 km is given specifically for hypersonic missiles.
      And, probably, the main thing is that the EPR for a hypersonic object is no longer important. bully
      1. Vita vko 22 May 2020 10: 56 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Private-K
        This radar is positioned as designed to detect hypersonic missiles

        This is due to the features of the automation of target detection and tracking systems. In standard options, the maximum speed of targets that can be captured by the tracking system is up to 3 thousand km / h. Here, at 59H6, it is almost 3 times larger.
        Quote: Private-K
        EPR for a hypersonic object

        An ionized layer appears in the circle of any hypersonic object moving in the atmosphere. As a result, the EPR increases by tens and hundreds of times. Therefore, if we talk about such goals, then the maximum range of their detection will be almost ultimate, "instrumental", this is about 600 km.
  4. novel66 21 May 2020 13: 27 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    detect little - what to intercept?
    1. cniza 21 May 2020 13: 29 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      This will be the second stage, although the complex is better. hi
      1. novel66 21 May 2020 13: 30 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        well yes. saw his tryndets and managed to pray .. hi
        1. cniza 21 May 2020 13: 32 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Can it run away? but not a fact ...
          1. novel66 21 May 2020 13: 37 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            run away in hypersound ??? laughing laughing worth a try
            1. cniza 21 May 2020 13: 41 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Well, there are all sorts of frisky means ... lol
              1. novel66 21 May 2020 13: 43 New
                • 4
                • 4
                0
                diarrhea?? Yes. he is fast ..
                1. Piramidon 21 May 2020 14: 59 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  diarrhea?? Yes. he is fast ..

                  Fu, how do you spoil your appetite here. I just poured myself a cup of coffee, and here is your comment. negative
                  1. hydrox 22 May 2020 08: 08 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Claudia not flooded? smile
                    1. hydrox 22 May 2020 14: 26 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      And why is this I do not understand your aggressiveness?
                      Can you tell me (if this, of course, is not a diagnosis)?
                      1. hydrox 23 May 2020 19: 17 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Ohhh!
                        Negative again without comment?
                        Not only as the Page Corps finished, Your Grace ... laughing
    2. NEXUS 21 May 2020 15: 24 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: novel xnumx
      detect little - what to intercept?

      On the opposite courses, subject to a predictable trajectory of a hypersonic missile, which must be intercepted, it is possible also with those anti-missiles that are now available.
      At the same time, if the detection range is 450 km in the export version, then for your loved ones, this radius is probably larger. And if we recall that Prometheus, as the developers say, will have a radius of interception of 600 km, then I think that the radius of detection of such targets in this radar for his army will be at least these same 600 km.
      1. poquello 22 May 2020 04: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        subject to a predictable trajectory of a hypersonic missile to be intercepted

        and where by the way their trident at 16m was aiming when she fell next to Florida?
        1. hydrox 22 May 2020 08: 11 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Was she hypersonic? Well, sand spilled out of it - because it didn’t fall on Florida. smile
          1. poquello 22 May 2020 10: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: poquello
            and where by the way their trident at 16m was aiming when she fell next to Florida?

            Quote: hydrox
            Was she hypersonic?

            and hypersonic, you think, will be more predictable?
            1. hydrox 22 May 2020 14: 24 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              They will, but not in the coming decade, if the Yankees even have no decent prototypes yet ...
  5. jetfors_84 21 May 2020 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Perhaps someone interested in such a radar has a means of defeating hypersonic targets? Are there any?
  6. knn54 21 May 2020 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Speed ​​10M-3,4 km / s. 450 km rocket flies in 2 minutes. Will the operator succeed?
    1. novel66 21 May 2020 13: 37 New
      • 2
      • 7
      -5
      in the pants ?? easily !!
  7. Pvi1206 21 May 2020 13: 36 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    detection tools without means of neutralizing targets ... who needs it? ... it is better to be ignorant that in a few minutes you will cease to exist ...
    1. cniza 21 May 2020 13: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Or maybe someone wants to know. And it is
    2. really 21 May 2020 13: 44 New
      • 0
      • 6
      -6
      And why destroy the radar that does not see laughing
    3. NEXUS 21 May 2020 15: 26 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Pvi1206
      detection tools without means of neutralizing targets ... who needs it? ... it is better to be ignorant that in a few minutes you will cease to exist ...

      Interception on catch-up courses is now impossible, but on the oncoming courses, those missiles that are now available will also fit. And the same 3 minutes is enough to make a volley not just one missile defense, but all the air defense systems.
  8. KVU-NSVD 21 May 2020 13: 49 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The radar is good, but without means of intercepting g / sound means it can only serve as a warning means, moreover, with a desirable location on distant approaches ... but not everyone has these distant approaches. Again, the EPR of the targets detected at the maximum speed is not indicated and the heights are not only medium and large ... Maybe someone will buy from those who have layered air defense, but not many ... maybe the Chinese or the Indians for review ... well Iranians can .. more customers are not likely to be found ..
    1. knn54 21 May 2020 14: 03 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Victor, in this case we need AI. That is, an INSTANT reaction, which a person (operator) simply does not have.
      When approaching the target, the speed of the hypersonic module decreases.
      And today the ONLY way to fight is to dazzle / knock off the course with EW, laser, precisely on the final segment of the flight path.
  9. yfast 21 May 2020 13: 58 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Isn’t it easier to pinpoint such crap? She doesn’t do 2km \ sec near the ground. And you do not shine, and the EPR sideways, and the operator is not needed.
  10. GMM
    GMM 21 May 2020 14: 06 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    And will cover this radar armor-C1?
  11. Vasyan1971 21 May 2020 14: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    In addition to hypersonic targets, it also effectively detects aerodynamic and ballistic objects

    So fe-35 in flight?
  12. GMM
    GMM 21 May 2020 14: 21 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Russia introduces a new radar to the foreign market for the detection of hypersonic targets

    “So we don’t need such a radar if we push it over a hill?”
    “Although yes, only we have hypersonic missiles.” So we really do not need such a radar, we can use it to track nothing ...
    - But those who buy this station abroad will just have our Zircons, Daggers and something else there is a hypersonic pinpoint ...
    1. awdrgy 21 May 2020 15: 00 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      So we are peaceful. We are not at war with anyone. We are not attacking anyone
    2. vVvAD 21 May 2020 23: 19 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Before you write such nonsense, did you bother to check the flight speeds of Zircon and the Dagger and think a little?
      1) No, this is a truncated version for the countries that sympathize with us, which allows us to detect US hypersonic weapons. It will not accelerate faster in the next 5-10 years.
      2) See item 1
      3) As if 11000-12000 km / h even Wikipedia gives.
  13. vkd.dvk 21 May 2020 14: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: T-100
    The detection range of 450 km at an object speed of 8 thousand km / h seems to me not enough. It turns out that if I correctly think that an object is flying at 8 thousand km / h, then 133,3 km / min will fly somewhere in a minute. It turns out as soon as the radar detects the target (at a maximum range of 450 km) it will have 3,3 s to give target designation, but then the radar / object will then be guaranteed to be destroyed.

    And why did you decide that the target moves exactly on the forehead of the radar? Are there no tangent lines? The network of such stations determines not only hypersonic glands, but also space aliens. It’s clear that destroying meteorites is a pure theory with the help of these stations, but meteorites usually don’t fly alone. The statistics of flights of flocks of these debris near the Earth provide food for thought.
  14. vkd.dvk 21 May 2020 14: 53 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Not specified, the EPR of the objects that this station detects at 450 km.
    Maybe this is a plane, the size of an AWACS aircraft?

    The dream of a Jewish boy. A super-duper bomber the size of an AWACS airplane at hypersonic speed flies to bomb Iranian nuclear reactors.
  15. Vladimir61 21 May 2020 15: 50 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Russia introduces a new radar to the foreign market for the detection of hypersonic targets

    Even if there is no buyer, this is a good trolling for "our partners."
  16. Zaurbek 21 May 2020 17: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And with what antenna? AFAR or PFAR?
  17. Radikal 22 May 2020 16: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russia is launching a new radar station capable of detecting hypersonic missiles on the foreign market. According to the press service of Rosoboronexport, the company offers foreign customers the 59N6-TE radar station.
    Have your air defense units been saturated with this technique? Then hold the flag .... lol
  18. gregor6549 22 May 2020 17: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The declared performance characteristics of this radar are in great doubt. Firstly, in all published materials (and they, except for those that carry a cart and a small cart), are modestly silent on the objectives with which EPR the claimed range of 450 km is achieved and in which altitude range (This radar is positioned by the developer for medium and high altitude radars)
    Secondly, judging by the photo, this radar is an all-round radar with mechanical rotation of the antenna in the azimuthal plane and with electronic scanning in the elevation plane. And if so, then the viewing period in the azimuthal plane will be too long to confidently detect and accompany hypersonic targets. For such purposes, electronic scanning of the beam in both planes is needed, and this is the lot of sector-wide surveillance stations similar to sector-based radars of the S300 / C400 air defense system.
    Further, in one of the published materials, it is stated that this radar is capable of detecting, detecting, capturing for tracking (route formation) and tracking up to 1000 air targets in automatic and semi-automatic mode, which clearly looks like near-science fiction.
    But in general, everything is clear. There is a goal to equip this radar to a foreign customer in the hope that no one is going to attack his hypersonic missiles in the near future (due to the absence of such missiles from probable opponents), and he can hardly expect a simultaneous raid of 1000 air targets i.e. It will be more than difficult to check how advertising TTXs correspond to real ones. So you’re going the right way, comrade marketers from NIIRT.