Kalashnikov Concern introduced a new reconnaissance UAV ZALA 421-16EV

90
Kalashnikov Concern introduced a new reconnaissance UAV ZALA 421-16EV

The company ZALA AERO, part of the Kalashnikov concern, has developed a new hybrid drone ZALA 421-16EV, designed for reconnaissance. This was reported in a press release distributed by the company.

According to the report, the new drone combines aircraft and helicopter properties. The main advantage of this model is the possibility of take-off and landing "in helicopter", i.e. vertically, which in turn does not require special sites or catapults. It is clarified that the ZALA 421-16EV can take off and land completely in automatic mode.



The new unmanned ZALA 421-16EV HD complex broadcasts the video stream in HD format (1280 * 720), which allows the ground station operator to view the video video in great detail

- declare in the company.

It is noted that the new drone has light weight (there are no exact data, but judging by other models of the company - in the region of 10 kg), cruising speed - 110 km / h, while in the air - 2 hours. The main purpose is reconnaissance, aerial photography and terrain monitoring.

The complex, before the start of mass production, passed all the required tests and successfully proved itself in the field. Among customers there are both government bodies and enterprises, as well as various commercial structures.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -22
    21 May 2020 12: 04
    A shock drone is more needed than these scouts, who are already more than a flea on a dog!
    1. 5-9
      -18
      21 May 2020 12: 18
      Why do we need him? Even a light Turkish Bayaktar with two tiny rackets costs 10 lyam bucks.
      No, in the sense of replacing them with Syria Drying for bombing the Papuans, it will come in handy ... and what is it for? We seem to be preparing more for the Great War, and there from them - the sense of one sortie.
      1. +13
        21 May 2020 12: 26
        Quote: 5-9
        Why do we need him? Even a light Turkish Bayaktar with two tiny rackets costs 10 lyam bucks.

        Now compare how much it costs to manufacture an airplane and train a pilot. And how long can a UAV hang over a certain area and who will respond more quickly to an unexpected threat on earth? No strike UAVs are needed, but they are not yet able to completely replace manned aircraft, they can supplement it for now.
        1. 5-9
          -6
          21 May 2020 12: 31
          You write everything correctly, but this is only against the Papuans with MANPADS at most .... A big drummer for dozens of lyam bucks weighing a ton and a size of more than 10 m if they do not suppress electronic warfare, so they will not scam off the biggest missiles or send fighters.
          Some niche m. in the form of a Hunter (if he has good fighter-type LTH) in conjunction with the Su-57, but this is not a thing of the near future. And something like a slow-moving Ripper - not a tenant.
          1. +5
            21 May 2020 12: 38
            Quote: 5-9
            A big drummer for dozens of lyamov bucks weighing a ton and a size of more than 10 m if they do not suppress electronic warfare, so they will not abstain from launching the largest missiles or send fighters.

            Well, to cover up our bases in Syria would be the very thing. And now there are a lot of drone UAVs. From huge, multi-ton, capable of plowing the sky for days both over the indicated squares and along the routes, and to small "kamikazes", such as those that Israel is now using against anti-aircraft weapons in Syria and not without success ...
            1. 5-9
              +2
              21 May 2020 14: 03
              Well, that’s what I’m saying - in counter-popular wars, drums are needed ....
              And the Israeli kamikaze are cruise missiles with a detachable part, and the conditions of use are very specific, on equal terms, taking into account their range, the enemy would have covered the launch points, I’m not talking about the downing on the way .... in general, Israeli-Syrian gunfights are football, where only one team has an effort on goal, and the other doesn’t even run out of its own half of the field ... therefore goals in its goal will be
          2. -10
            21 May 2020 13: 17
            Papuans with MANPADS maximum ....
            - whether the case of ZRPK "Pantsir", yeah. "Bayraktary" clicks like nuts. Oh, No..
            so do not disdain to launch the largest missiles or send fighters
            .
            Yes, it’s better, of course, to send a manned vehicle. She's so cheap and missiles bounce off her. A pilot can be trained in a week at all, yeah.
            it's not about the near future
            - This is a matter of the present day. And the near future is when manned aircraft will complement unmanned (although more correctly, remotely controlled).
            EW is not a panacea or a magic umbrella, especially if the war is not against the Papuans. What can a large number of shock drones - the Turks demonstrate in Syria and Libya.
            1. +6
              21 May 2020 13: 48
              Quote: Ryazanets87
              What can a large number of shock drones - the Turks demonstrate in Syria and Libya.

              More precisely, that a large number of shock drones can against an army, exhausted by many years of civil war, or illegal armed groups.
              Quote: Ryazanets87
              - whether the case of ZRPK "Pantsir", yeah. "Bayraktary" clicks like nuts. Oh, No..

              Technology itself does not fight. She needs personnel who know the technique and know how to apply it. If the UAV calmly went into the dead zone of an air defense missile system and works from it as at a training ground, then no equipment will help.
            2. D16
              +2
              21 May 2020 15: 36
              Turks demonstrate in Syria and Libya.

              Not for long, they were enough in Syria. As soon as the Syrians pulled up the Beeches and showed what they were taught by knowledgeable people, they immediately concluded a truce on very favorable terms. By the way, the Turks obviously do not want to continue the banquet.
              1. -4
                21 May 2020 16: 02
                Not for long, they were enough in Syria.

                just enough to stop the offensive of the Syrian army along with, so to speak, assistants. What the Turks needed at that time.
                By the way, the Turks obviously do not want to continue the banquet.

                They do not want to, of course: they are quite satisfied with the situation in which the "green" foothold remains. But Assad is just not there: he understands that with the weakening of assistance from Russia and Iran, the Greens will instantly creep apart, they have help and support always close by.
                R.S. interestingly, the Turks were able to demonstrate a more mature tactically and fairly massive use of shock UAVs. The Russian army, by the way, still cannot technically realize this. I hope the situation changes.
                1. +2
                  21 May 2020 16: 17
                  Quote: Ryazanets87
                  just enough to stop the offensive of the Syrian army along with, so to speak, assistants. What the Turks needed at that time.

                  You somehow selectively take this "serial experience" into account.
                  They remembered Turkish UAVs, but forgot about Iranian ones.
                  Which for some reason turned out to be quite ineffective. Only two attacks on control points of such UAVs were enough. And even the helplessness of the Israelis in intercepting drones did not help, the Iranians and their proxies refused experiments.
                2. D16
                  +1
                  21 May 2020 18: 57
                  just enough to stop the offensive of the Syrian army along with, so to speak, assistants. What the Turks needed at that time.

                  But what about the requirements for CAA to return to the old line of demarcation in accordance with the Sochi accords? And then suddenly half-kingdom agreed laughing . Probably from the fact that the Turks are strong lol . And the offensive cannot last forever. Sooner or later, resources are running out and a truce is required on both sides. Before the start of the next company. That fact. that the Turks, at the very least, have begun to fulfill their obligations, suggests that they are not very keen on the next Marlezon ballet act.
                  interestingly, the Turks were able to demonstrate a more mature tactically and fairly massive use of shock UAVs.

                  Compared to whom? Is it with Iran? So Iran did not fight in Idlib. At least I don’t remember that. Even hezbola was not marked there.
                  The Russian army, by the way, still cannot technically realize this.

                  I suspect that none of our new UAVs will take away 2 FAB500s, and without them we will not be able to solve combat tasks laughing . All mass activity ended with the appearance of something similar to army air defense among the Syrians.
            3. +2
              21 May 2020 15: 40
              Quote: Ryazanets87
              What can a large number of shock drones - the Turks demonstrate in Syria and Libya.

              Rather, it demonstrates that politics interfering in hostilities is disgusting.
              All in all, the problem is to strike at UAV control centers.
              What Syria could not afford. But this could reduce the effectiveness of the prodigy to zero.
              1. -3
                21 May 2020 16: 05
                All in all, the problem is to strike at UAV control centers.

                Well, about ordinary aviation, you can say: there are only problems that cover airfields.
                If Turkey could afford to inflict, say, a rocket and artillery strike on Khmeimim, then the effectiveness of Russian aviation would also be ... um, clearly reduced.
                1. +2
                  21 May 2020 16: 08
                  Quote: Ryazanets87
                  Well, about ordinary aviation, you can say: there are only problems that cover airfields.

                  From drone UAV also helps a lot.

                  Quote: Ryazanets87
                  If Turkey could afford to inflict, say, a rocket and artillery strike on Khmeimim, then the effectiveness of Russian aviation would also be ... um, clearly reduced.

                  The fact of the matter is that we must prepare for a war in which such a blow must be dealt.
            4. 0
              22 May 2020 10: 25
              "The Turks are demonstrating what a large number of attack drones can do in Syria and Libya." - There is no "Autobase" on them!
        2. +4
          21 May 2020 12: 33
          broadcasts a video stream in HD format (1280 * 720)

          not enough for intelligence
          1. +4
            21 May 2020 12: 59
            Quote: Thrall

            not enough for intelligence

            Yes, it’s strange. Even modern camcorders have a 4K resolution. And then the intelligence complex request
            1. +1
              21 May 2020 14: 22
              They have the wrong codecs. And cameras without digital zoom. So that one peak spruce up to full xd (as one presenter in biathlon spoke each time) zoomed.
            2. +1
              22 May 2020 10: 12
              Quote: kjhg
              Yes, it’s strange. Even modern camcorders have a 4K resolution. And then the intelligence complex

              the problem is not the resolution of the camera itself, but the data transfer.
        3. +3
          21 May 2020 12: 51
          Scouts are needed. A lot depends on them. Surely, during the test, they got out from the commission and got out questions that will take into account and embody. An UAV (reconnaissance) is good, you don’t need to build an airfield for it, you can transport it in a car, and it is always unexpected for the enemy.
        4. +1
          21 May 2020 13: 18
          Quote: svp67
          And how long can a UAV hang over a certain area?

          Exactly as much as he is allowed. It all depends on the technical equipment of the enemy.
      2. +1
        21 May 2020 15: 35
        Quote: 5-9
        Why do we need him?

        Why drag sneakers without socks?
        Fashion...
      3. 0
        21 May 2020 23: 27
        We seem to be preparing more for the Great War, and there from them - the sense of one sortie.

        And in a big war they will make sense even though it is not a "wunder-waffle" and you also need to be ready for a small war.
      4. 0
        22 May 2020 09: 29
        It is needed by artillerymen, scouts, etc.
    2. +1
      21 May 2020 12: 21
      Quote: Thrifty
      A shock drone is more needed than these scouts, who are already more than a flea on a dog!

      So they "kamikaze" have shown a long time ago, only that something about his future fate is not heard ... maybe "seppuku" did it for himself, or maybe he got sick with coronavirus?
    3. +1
      21 May 2020 12: 30
      Quote: Thrifty
      A shock drone is more needed than these scouts, who are already more than a flea on a dog!


      So there is Orion, Altius, the same S-70 Hunter. The work is on.
      Russian Aerospace Forces will destroy enemy medium- and short-range missiles before they are launched. The arsenal of unique drone drone “Hunter” and “Altius” will replenish the bomb “Thunder”. These heavy gliding munitions are capable of hitting targets over 100 km. For their exceptional accuracy in military-industrial circles, they received the nickname "sniper". According to experts, thanks to the new product, drones will be able to disable strategic objects in the deep rear of the enemy, while remaining invisible to radars.

      As sources in the military-industrial complex told Izvestia, a fundamental decision was made to equip domestic shock unmanned aerial vehicles with powerful and high-precision gliding bombs 9-A-7759 Thunder. Tests for the dumping of their bulk models from the heavy stealth UAV S-70 Okhotnik have already passed.

      But the integration of "sniper" bombs on the "Altiuses" is not yet complete.

      https://iz.ru/975885/anton-lavrov-aleeksei-ramm/grom-pobedy-udarnye-drony-unichtozhat-raketnye-kompleksy-protivnika
    4. -13
      21 May 2020 12: 31
      Please note that among customers there are authorities and enterprises. The UAV will find application for tracking violators of self-control, oops, self-isolation.
      1. 0
        21 May 2020 12: 36
        Correctly. Life does not stand still. Mistakes are also an experience. Even Russian Post tried to launch a drone to deliver mail. But the first pancake came out lumpy: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = W6c1_r-lpY0.
      2. -1
        21 May 2020 14: 24
        Do not touch the organs! State without them walk the field.
    5. +1
      21 May 2020 14: 21
      Quote: Thrifty
      A shock drone is more needed than these scouts

      From the sofa, of course, you know better.
    6. +3
      21 May 2020 14: 37
      Quote: Thrifty
      A shock drone is more needed than these scouts, who are already more than a flea on a dog!


      Different birds are needed
      All sorts of birds are important ...
      1. +2
        21 May 2020 15: 57
        Quote: Insurgent
        Different birds are needed. All sorts of birds are important ...

        Now. especially in DLNR ...
    7. 0
      21 May 2020 14: 55
      A shock drone is more needed than these scouts

      It depends on which, for example, most Russian UAV reconnaissance aircraft can give the coordinates of reconnoitered targets from local landmarks or flying exactly over the target. These methods have their own, quite understandable, limitations. According to the criterion of cost-effectiveness, "the best with the help of a laser rangefinder. We, for a moment, only have one on Orion."
  2. 0
    21 May 2020 12: 07
    And what is the height, range?
    1. +2
      21 May 2020 12: 44
      Quote: ASAD
      And what is the height, range?

      Quadrocopter ZALA 421-16EV VTOL
    2. +1
      21 May 2020 14: 24
      Quote: ASAD
      And what is the height, range?


      Or maybe from the CIA? laughing
  3. 0
    21 May 2020 12: 08
    I’m not an aviator, but the photo is somehow not convincing, if it’s electric motors, why are they so thin? Please correct me ..
    1. +6
      21 May 2020 13: 10
      Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
      I'm not an aviator, but the photo is somehow not convincing, if it's electric motors, why are they so thin?

      You don't need to be an aviator or a techie to understand that modern micromotors made from so-called "super magnets" based on rare earth metals are far ahead of their counterparts in the recent past.
      Actually, now everything rests mainly on light, capacious, and at the same time cheap batteries, and to a lesser extent the element base and software, the "brains" of the UAV.

      The engines are small but distant ...
    2. -16
      21 May 2020 13: 12
      I understood, I understood, there’s an engine with aviation tires, remember those who went to aviation circles laughing , and that did not immediately guess?
      1. +2
        21 May 2020 13: 26
        Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
        I understood, I understood, there’s an engine with aviation tires, remember those who went to air circles, and that you didn’t guess at once?

        Well, if you have such an opinion about the technological level of the Kalashnikov concern, then this is only yours an opinion justified apparently by a pioneering past in which you are clearly stuck ...
      2. -4
        21 May 2020 13: 59
        Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
        I understood, I understood, there’s an engine with aviation tires, remember those who went to aviation circles laughing , and that did not immediately guess?

        Yes, the photo is generally fake - the Mi-26 helicopter is retouched on it, which drags the drone on the external sling. laughing
  4. +2
    21 May 2020 12: 16
    new hybrid drone

    very "informative" of course. However, this may be a great war and commercial secret.
  5. -5
    21 May 2020 12: 22
    All these attempts to create some kind of ridiculous samples resemble the boom in the development of aviation technology at the beginning of the last century. There were no attempts. As a result, through trial and error, all world aircraft manufacturers have come to understand which way to move. Unmanned aircraft repeats the same path.
    As for the UAV segment for tactical reconnaissance, they should be of minimal size, not expensive and massive. So that each company has drones available with which it could control the area entrusted to it.
    1. +7
      21 May 2020 12: 42
      All these attempts to create some kind of ridiculous samples resemble the boom in the development of aviation technology at the beginning of the last century.

      absurd it can only be in your mind. Because everything is perfectly done for you only overseas. And here is the project, which is proposed as a replacement for the light UAV, which we have in operation today, such as the Bees1M and others like them.
      1. -6
        21 May 2020 12: 50
        Quote: Ka-52
        absurd it can only be in your mind.

        When will you learn to communicate without rudeness? Until m ... e get it? angry
        Quote: Ka-52
        And here is the project, which is proposed as a replacement for the light UAV, which is in operation with us today, such as the Bees1

        What kind of bee? Wake up already! In the yard 2020. In our army, Orlan-10 has long been used with might and main. Wouldn’t be dishonored better negative
        1. +3
          21 May 2020 13: 07
          What kind of bee? Wake up already! In the yard 2020. In our army, Orlan-10 has long been used with might and main. Wouldn’t be dishonored better

          answer directly and shortly, without your usual comic antics - Orlan 10 is not an easy reconnaissance UAV?
          When will you learn to communicate without rudeness?

          poked, I wrote you a comment on "you". And about the "muzzle", it is so easy to threaten on the Internet, the keyboard will not give change. Offended that I accidentally stepped on your American love? Does it bother you that new models of technology are being developed in the Russian Federation?
          1. -6
            21 May 2020 13: 28
            Quote: Ka-52
            Orlan 10 is not an easy reconnaissance UAV?

            And the earth is round and the water is wet, and why? What did you want to say? Well, at least he knew about Orlan from me, otherwise he would have lived in his idea of ​​the army with the Bee
            Quote: Ka-52
            poked, I wrote you a comment on "you"

            And you try to write at least once without rudeness, if you can, of course.
            Quote: Ka-52
            And about the "muzzle", it is so easy to threaten on the Internet, the keyboard will not give change.

            So therefore, people like you are rude on the Internet. I doubt that in real life you communicate this way. Although I, if you could not get anything else and achieve in your life, then everything is possible.
            1. +3
              21 May 2020 13: 39
              What did you want to say? Well, at least he knew about Orlan from me, otherwise he would have lived in his idea of ​​the army with the Bee

              that is, there will be no answer? Well then, go ahead and preach that everything is bad in Russia, but good in America. Maybe there will be appreciated and "combat" will be raised for victory in the next Internet battle.
              Although I, if you could not get anything else and achieve in your life

              Yes, I’ll go to the box from under my TV to fix my foam rubber, otherwise at night in the park it’s still cold to sleep in it.
              1. -3
                21 May 2020 13: 47
                Yes, and fulfill one of my requests, do not write to me again, NEVER. Just pass by my comments. You can just put the cons without reading, but DO NOT WRITE.
                1. +2
                  21 May 2020 13: 51
                  You can just put the cons without reading, but DO NOT WRITE.

                  Fulfill my request, too - do not write on VO anymore, NEVER. Here and without you many times, mud pours onto my country with or without. hi
    2. 0
      21 May 2020 14: 29
      A week ago, Amer drones at 15 grams were already discussing. With replaceable batteries, laptop and other stray.
  6. -2
    21 May 2020 12: 23
    Kalashnikov Concern introduced a new reconnaissance UAV ZALA 421-16EV
    Class! Urgently need to revive the pioneer circles of aircraft models. Really, save lard grandmas. feel And honestly write: Flight range - 100 km, ashamed? request Or if I could hang for hours ... request No faces, no skin. Tiltrotor ... lin. fool
    1. -5
      21 May 2020 12: 27
      Mauritius hi he will not fly 100 kilometers, crows will not allow am
    2. +7
      21 May 2020 12: 31
      Flight range - 100 km, ashamed?

      and who should be ashamed? Maybe you don’t know the specifics of intelligence tasks. Do you think that any UAV should have a range of 5 km like Global Hawk? Actually, for reconnaissance UAVs in the interests of the battalion unit of 100 km. that’s it. Big for him is redundant. Because it is both weight and service, etc.
      1. +3
        21 May 2020 12: 37
        When they show small-scale UAVs over the Donbass, then all together remember the pioneer circles when it from the Kalashnikov concern - they begin to discuss TTX with a businesslike look ...
      2. -7
        21 May 2020 12: 39
        Quote: Ka-52
        should be ashamed? Maybe you don’t know the specifics of intelligence tasks.
        I think you should be ashamed of the stupidities attributed to others. An hour of exploration is not enough. And the convertiplane bells and whistles will give weight, complexity, price and service, children's toys. negative
        1. +1
          21 May 2020 12: 52
          I think it should be a shame to you, for the stupidities attributed to others

          you are arguing for the sake of argument, and even being rude. The parameters of a light UAV fit within a radius of 100km and time in the air for 2-3 hours. Take for example the lightweight American UAV RQ-11 Raven, RQ-20 Puma, Israeli Skylark and others. They all have similar parameters and tasks. And you would just throw on the fan
          1. -8
            21 May 2020 12: 54
            Quote: Ka-52
            And you would just throw on the fan

            Liberast? Clear.
            1. +5
              21 May 2020 12: 57
              Liberast? Clear.

              I don’t know who you are and it’s violet to me. I don’t understand how sideways your sexual orientation relates to the topic of UAVs. All arguments ended?
              1. -7
                21 May 2020 13: 23
                Congratulations on your arguments. We compared our latest with the first UAVs 15 years ago.
                RQ-11 Raven
                Weight - 1.7 kg
                Speed ​​- 95 km / h
                Ceiling - 5000 m
                Radius - 10 km
                Engine Type - Electric
                Length - 96 see
                The flight duration is 45-60 minutes.

                Complete victory! negative
                RQ-20 Puma Weight - 6,1 kg
                Speed ​​- 83 km / h
                cruising 37 km. h
                Ceiling - 150 m
                Radius - 15 km
                Engine Type - Electric
                Length - 1,4 m.
                Duration - flight 3,3 hours

                Complete victory! This unit is similar to a weapon. That's just the range .... vinfeel with speed and flight time, how is it ?.
                1. +7
                  21 May 2020 13: 35
                  Complete victory! This unit is similar to a weapon. That's just the range .... vinfeel at speed and flight time is quite, how so ?.

                  Mauritius, are you so hard? I repeat to you one last time. it light UAV reconnaissance battlefield!!!! He has enough radius and time in the air. This UAV conducts reconnaissance in the interests of the tactical echelon up to the battalion level. He does not need reconnaissance of what is being done 500 miles from the front line. It is needed to look "over the hill". With the growth of characteristics, the weight will also stretch. A more powerful control center will be needed, more maintenance personnel. Why is this at the tactical level? What are you comparing there?
  7. +2
    21 May 2020 12: 30
    interesting solution, minus weight, plus flying qualities
  8. +1
    21 May 2020 12: 32
    Quote: "The new unmanned complex ZALA 421-16EV HD broadcasts a video stream in HD format (1280 * 720), which allows the operator of the ground station to view the streaming video in great detail" End of quote.
    It may very well be, although unlikely. I doubt it. By the way, where is the element base from?
    1. -4
      21 May 2020 12: 49
      Quote: iouris
      It may very well be, although unlikely.

      That's right. This is not a weapon, but cutting and sewing mugs. feel
  9. +3
    21 May 2020 12: 37
    And tell me the fool why the name of the device and the company uses Latin letters. Zhirinovsky is not enough for them.
    ..
    Orion, Orlan, Altair, Barmaley ... normal, understandable to us, who grew up in Russian and Cyrillic, names .. but then you understand horseradish.
  10. +4
    21 May 2020 12: 51
    (ZALA) again in Latin! fighting for the purity of the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE! ZALA-ash, ashes. laughing wassat n-yes
    1. 0
      21 May 2020 15: 43
      Quote: Far East
      (ZALA) again in Latin!

      So this is the name of the manufacturer - ZALA AERO. And this name is already 15 years old.
      1. +1
        22 May 2020 09: 26
        yes, at least 5 years. It's not about years! let's brand Kalashnikov, etc. write in Latin! I do not live behind a cardon like you, we are a NATIVE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE.
      2. 0
        22 May 2020 11: 16
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Quote: Far East
        (ZALA) again in Latin!

        So this is the name of the manufacturer - ZALA AERO. And this name is already 15 years old.

        ====
        and what does it change? perhaps with even more unprecedented dominance and borrowing of foreign words, especially English, everywhere and everywhere.
  11. +5
    21 May 2020 12: 53
    Quote: 5-9
    Why do we need him? Even a light Turkish Bayaktar with two tiny rackets costs 10 lyam bucks.
    No, in the sense of replacing them with Syria Drying for bombing the Papuans, it will come in handy ... and what is it for? We seem to be preparing more for the Great War, and there from them - the sense of one sortie.

    So in a big war, and the aircraft is designed for one flight. We were taught that way. But the plane has a crew, and the drone is a piece of iron. People need to be protected!
  12. GMM
    +1
    21 May 2020 13: 15
    Sorry for the naivety, I want to ask the experts. Is it an ordinary UAV or unparalleled in the world?
    1. +1
      21 May 2020 13: 45
      Normal of course.
      You can read about the Israeli uav mini pantera. https://vpk.name/news/47414_izrael_aerospeis_indastriz_prodemonstrirovala_bla_mini-panter.html
    2. +1
      21 May 2020 15: 03
      In this class, the main thing is that it be simple and cheap. They need to be done a lot, uniqueness is not necessary.
  13. -3
    21 May 2020 13: 29
    "time spent in the air - 2 hours" ////
    ------
    belay
    Two hours? Usually 12-24 hours
    1. +2
      21 May 2020 13: 58
      We are talking about tactical versions. They are all not large in size and carrying capacity, and do not have a long flight duration.
    2. -2
      21 May 2020 14: 32
      Skolkovo batteries. With nano charging.
    3. +1
      21 May 2020 18: 36
      And figs 24 hours, if the battalion needs to be raised in 2 hours to attack? fool
      And half an hour before the attack, artillery preparation should be done, sectors should be marked, targets should be determined, armored vehicles and cargo convoys should be spotted on the way ...
  14. +3
    21 May 2020 14: 19
    It would be interesting to see the take-off and landing process "like a helicopter". You cannot understand this by the external location of the propellers.
    1. 0
      22 May 2020 11: 33
      Quote: xomaNN
      It was interesting to see the process take-off and landing "in a helicopter" way. The external location of the propellers does not understand this

      ===
      interesting,. Yes! first public information, we’ll support a bit.
  15. 0
    21 May 2020 15: 01
    In such a thing will be good, the main thing is that they be done en masse.
  16. -4
    21 May 2020 16: 05
    Name ZALA. Did the Hungarians do it? Or copied from the Hungarians?
    1. -1
      21 May 2020 19: 35
      ZALA is a region in southwestern Hungary and the ZALA river flows there
  17. 0
    21 May 2020 17: 08
    The name is like a Chinese car
  18. +1
    21 May 2020 19: 12
    would show the video how it takes off, goes into horizontal flight mode, sits down
  19. +1
    21 May 2020 20: 56
    ZALA AERO, a member of the Kalashnikov concern
    And what about Litinitsa, Cyrillic is not held in high esteem?
    ZALA 421-16EV - well, let them leave it for themselves.
    As I understand it, ZALA AERO is another sucker to the Russian budget, wishing to steal another Wunder-waffle.
  20. vdm
    +1
    21 May 2020 23: 36
    For a long time in the Russian Federation, an unmanned tiltrotor "ERA" (not to be confused with a quadrocopter with an attached pusher propeller) has been developed and on sale with a flight time of up to 4 hours
    with a cruising speed of 110 km / h, with real wind resistance up to 21 ms.
  21. 0
    22 May 2020 12: 59
    It looks like an attempt to mislead (who?). Is the industry generally capable of producing this type of weapon? Perhaps, for the accelerated development of this topic, the RF Ministry of Defense needs to form a separate branch of the armed forces ("customer"), if it's not too late.
  22. 0
    23 May 2020 17: 55
    So much debate about the performance characteristics. Why is one of the most important issues not covered - how much the development cost and how much will cost, for example, a lot of 1000 pcs.
  23. 0
    25 May 2020 09: 11
    In this photo, I see the Israeli Orbiter UAV, (operated since 2004), to which the VTOL system was screwed (amateur modellers have been using it since at least 2013). I’m embarrassed to ask, where exactly is hidden here development the company ZALA AERO, which is already part of the whole Kalashnikov concern? And why my home-made UAV, with PX4 autopilot and free QGC software, can, after pressing a single button on a smartphone, automatically take off, carry out a mission, return to the starting point and land, while the ZALA 421-16EV intended for reconnaissance by ZALA AERO, which is already whole to the Kalashnikov concern, can't that? And yes, I wildly want to see at least somewhere, at least once, the vaunted HD-link of ZALA AERO, which is part of the whole Kalashnikov concern, at a distance of at least 5 km, at an altitude of 100 meters and in cloudy weather. lol