In Germany, the Nord Stream gas pipeline was removed from the EU gas directive


In the press there were reports that in Germany the Nord Stream gas pipeline was completely exempted from the so-called “gas” directive of the European Union. Recall that the “gas” EU directive prescribes filling the pipe with energy carriers in such a way that no more than 50% of the “blue fuel” pumping volume is assigned to one supplier. According to Brussels, this will increase competitiveness and make deliveries transparent.


However, in the case of Nord Stream, the EU itself had difficulties because of its directive. They consisted in the fact that, apart from Gazprom, no other company could ensure the full-scale operation of the pipeline.

Information Service RIA News, referring to the operator Nord Stream AG, reported that the Federal Network Agency of Germany "Nord Stream" decided to withdraw from the action of the "gas" EU directive for a period of 20 years with the right to extend.

Recall that the Nord Stream gas pipeline allows pumping gas from Russia to Europe. It was commissioned in 2011. Its length exceeds 1,2 thousand km, its capacity is about 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year. This is a truly significant project for Europe itself, allowing to receive gas from the Russian Federation without intermediaries and at affordable prices.

It should be added that the operator of Nord Stream-2 is seeking to withdraw the gas pipeline under construction from under the same EU gas directive. We are talking about the appeal. So far, the court has dismissed the lawsuit against "European gas standards."
Photos used:
website of the Nord Stream operator
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy 21 May 2020 07: 21 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    In Germany, the Nord Stream gas pipeline was removed from the EU gas directive
    Here and there, back, you and I are pleased. (From indecent) repeat
    1. knn54 21 May 2020 07: 24 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      Why indecent is a swing ...
      1. Mavrikiy 21 May 2020 07: 26 New
        • 7
        • 7
        0
        Quote: knn54
        Why indecent is a swing ...

        This is not a swing, but an ideological diversion. Party documents need to be read. repeat In the magazine “Murzilka” in the 80s, a series of puzzles was placed, dual-use, including “First you remember it a little, it will become as hard as potato” (snowball), “What kind of a Bolshevik is climbing on our armored car?” etc. The entire edition of the grenade launchers! request But little and late. request
        1. Mitroha 21 May 2020 07: 34 New
          • 17
          • 0
          +17
          And what kind of half measures in Europe? Let then even half of the gas carrier with liquefied gas arriving at the ports of Europe be either empty or from another supplier. Law is so law.
          1. seregatara1969 21 May 2020 07: 46 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            To impose fines in favor of Russia on those gas companies that refuse to pump their gas through our pipe. No excuses. Let the swing - according to the directive.
          2. Olgovich 21 May 2020 09: 11 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Mitroha
            And what kind of half measures in Europe? Let then even half of the gas carrier with liquefied gas arriving at the ports of Europe be either empty or from another supplier. Law is so law.

            and gas carriers and UKRO-pipeline, too.

            But .... everything concerns exclusively Russian pipelines
            1. orionvitt 21 May 2020 15: 22 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              Quote: Olgovich
              and gas carriers and UKRO-pipeline, too.

              Ukrotrub already works at half capacity. Jumped.
        2. Tatyana 21 May 2020 07: 50 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          It is all about corruption of bourgeois officials or, speaking Western, lobbyism.
          Whoever pays them the most or presses them harder, he wins.
          After all, the official himself does not produce anything material at his workplace in his office, but only manages the labor of others, the product produced by others and the property of others - and quietly quietly he takes part of the money from producers dependent on him and puts it in his pocket in the form of a bribe.
        3. Svetlana 21 May 2020 08: 33 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          There was no such thing in the murzilka. It's fake.
        4. Fitter65 21 May 2020 08: 42 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          In the magazine Murzilka in the 80s, a series of puzzles, a dual purpose

          At the time of the hunch building it was very fashionable, at first double-value puzzles, then forged documents (about the same Poles who were shot by the NKVD type) ...
      2. venik 21 May 2020 09: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: knn54
        Why indecent is a swing ...

        ========
        repeat Well ... You can, of course, so name ...... wassat
    2. Civil 21 May 2020 07: 47 New
      • 11
      • 22
      -11
      What a humiliation to beg to buy gas for the gay people. Otherwise, the budget does not fit ... tighten the belts, unite around the party and government. By 2050, we will take first place in the sale of gas to the cursed West.
      1. Insurgent 21 May 2020 08: 09 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        Information service RIA Novosti, referring to the operator Nord Stream AG, reported that the Federal Network Agency of Germany Nord Stream decided to withdraw from the EU gas directive for a period of 20 years with the right to renew.

        And for such a period, or donkey (EU), or padish (USA), they may well die yes .
        1. Simon schempp 21 May 2020 09: 21 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          And for such a period, or donkey (EU), or padish (USA), they may well die

          Well yes. And Russia for such a period will only grow stronger and majesty
        2. Lelek 21 May 2020 15: 02 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Insurgent
          And for such a period, or donkey (EU), or padish (USA), they may well die

          hi
          And dying die. Today is a small but victory for Russia. The main thing is that the government and Gazprom draw a lesson from this upheaval for the future.
      2. NEOZ 21 May 2020 12: 33 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        By 2050, we will take first place in the sale of gas to the cursed West.

        Well, it's better than giving land to multinational companies, isn't it?
      3. NordUral 21 May 2020 15: 15 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Why doesn't it fit together? These are perfectly reduced. It is necessary - they will raise the dollar to the desired value, more than once it rolled through them.
        Well, the bucks will cost 200 p. and these all come together. Then I’m sure the hole in the belt will be next to the buckle.
        True, there is another option. But in it these and at a distance of three light years are not visible.
    3. Vend 21 May 2020 10: 21 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      The fall of the economy makes us take interesting actions. It has been said more than once that for the West the loot is more important than any political position.
    4. vadim dok 21 May 2020 16: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Withdraw ONLY Nord Stream -1. North Stream -2 remains under the European Directive.
    5. vadim dok 21 May 2020 16: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Germany withdrew ONLY Nord Stream 1, and Nord Stream 2, REMAINS under the European Directive.
  2. Break through 21 May 2020 07: 28 New
    • 7
    • 10
    -3
    Not bad. The second stream will also output wink
    1. nemez 21 May 2020 08: 16 New
      • 12
      • 16
      -4
      What's good? We pull gas to Europe, and in the Urals and Siberia we fire wood. The great country is Russia.
      1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 08: 29 New
        • 6
        • 11
        -5
        a gas pipeline to every village?
        1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 09: 07 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          Do you think Natalya that our population is not worthy of comfort? Or in comfortable warmth (this is when you don’t need to kill yourself with firewood if you don’t know) only residents of cottage backyards should?
          1. Crystal of Truth 21 May 2020 09: 29 New
            • 6
            • 6
            0
            To drag a pipe 100 km for millions to gasify two yards?
            1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 09: 42 New
              • 8
              • 5
              +3
              Instead of choosing fake nicknames, it would be better to read more clever books. Do you know what the state’s social guarantee is? Yes, lug a pipe for two houses !!! When was the last time you were in distant villages? There were only old people there, you think they’re cutting firewood yes there’s enough energy and money? There will be gas and a road in the village, after five years there will already be not two houses, but ten. You already pulled up, homegrown economists. Just a little that bleat about Europe, and read about the amount of money invested per square kilometer we do not want.
              1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 11: 10 New
                • 3
                • 7
                -4
                no power will drag for the sake of two houses a gas pipeline, electricity
                1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 11: 52 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  Here you are trying to deceive Nastya. If the government is interested, it will erupt at the navel. For example, an Arctic wagon Canada, Greenland (these are capitalists) and northern villages under the USSR.
                  1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 11: 59 New
                    • 1
                    • 5
                    -4
                    Well, I agree, so what is the interest of the authorities to drag for the sake of two houses?
                    1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 12: 10 New
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      +4
                      And I already wrote, returning to the dying villages of the inhabitants of productive (working) age. Road, gas, electricity - support for the agricultural producer - and the problem of dependence on imports will be removed. One Kuban will not feed Russia.
                      1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 12: 46 New
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        -4
                        Rostov, Voronezh, Stavropolie, villages develop there because they are doing well, in other areas where they used to plant in the USSR it is now not profitable to plant
                      2. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 13: 48 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        And admit Anastasia, you are someone by training. I am very sure that it is very far from C / X. In the south, the rise is due to large agricultural complexes with state support and high grain prices. But agricultural is not only wheat, but also much more. You should not have been in vain about planting unsubscribe, planting is always profitable, you just need to know who, where and how much)))))) as well as what and where.
                      3. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 14: 19 New
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        -4
                        very close to agricultural, who prevents planting if it is profitable and you plant and the villages come to life, not you so the Chinese will
                      4. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 19: 07 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        And you saw the fields after the lease by the Chinese. I had a chance to see the Far East. There will not grow anything for ten years.
                      5. Nastia makarova 22 May 2020 06: 29 New
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        -2
                        if you don’t grow yourself, then there will be Chinese
      2. Motorist 21 May 2020 18: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Yes, drag a pipe for two houses !!!

        And what is the need for a gas tank (local capacity) bad? In my opinion - a good alternative, in the USSR the scheme worked.
        1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 19: 00 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Kind Motorist. He (gas holder) is not bad, he is expensive. Comparing liquefied gas with natural (pipeline) is not an option. If you start from the beginning of the chain (install containers, purchase transport and maintenance personnel), then the consumer will stop heart from the amount in receipts. I refused a gas stove (imported in cylinders) in favor of an electric stove (cheaper). You can estimate the cost of propane at a gas station.
          1. Motorist 21 May 2020 19: 23 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Alexey, and good evening to you. hi
            If you start from the beginning of the chain (establish capacities, purchase transport and maintenance personnel), then the consumer stops heart from the amount in receipts.

            In the USSR, tanks were buried in small villages, but then the 90s happened, and then their echo: people had nothing to pay, and the system also became. Because of decades of downtime, everything needs to be changed, and it costs money ... But everyone has been privatized, and now we have to pay for ourselves. Who needs all this if electricity is cheaper ?! Conclusion - capitalism is to blame.
            1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 20: 38 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              You start to distort the Motorist. The era of gas holders ended with the launch of the Yamal deposits and the construction of three lines of Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod. in 1983, along the whole route. regional gas networks started to run up from gas compressor stations, which replaced very cheap propane with their cheap natural gas. Simply, Gorbaty with his catastrophe filled up all the achievements and projects of the USSR. The problem is not in capitalism, but in the greed of some businessmen and in complete reluctance states in restoring order. When I tried to hold the pipe to my house, I checked the estimate, it was a third overpriced, when I tried to rebel, I was sent on an erotic journey. And since only two offices have a license, you already were given about the pricing in our gorode.Tak I without gas, but that capitalism is to blame for this, it's all words, blame the people of impunity.
              1. Motorist 21 May 2020 21: 27 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                You start to distort the minder.

                In no case, Alex - I write what I know and think.
                The era of gas tanks ended with the launch of the Yamal deposits and the construction of three lines of Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod.

                Did the pipeline supply gas to all European regions of the USSR?
                in 1983

                In the 83rd I was not enough years old, but I knew where my gas came from.
                The problem is not capitalism, but the greed of some businessmen

                Capitalism is the greed of businessmen.
  3. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 11: 08 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Natalya? question to question?
    1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 11: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Sorry love is
      1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 12: 01 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        gasification of even large cities with a population of about 100 thousand began only after 2000
  • Asad 21 May 2020 09: 49 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    There are a lot of large villages without gas near Novosibirsk!
  • Break through 21 May 2020 08: 37 New
    • 5
    • 11
    -6
    Do you propose not to sell gas and sit without money? Slowly gasify the country.
    1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 09: 13 New
      • 5
      • 7
      -2
      What kind of money is Viktor sitting at? What are you talking about? You just have to shake the Moscow and St. Petersburg high-rise buildings well and the country will not only have enough gas supply but also five years to heat for free.
      1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 11: 11 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        when the Soviet Union did not build and under capitalism and even more so
        1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 12: 00 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Under the Union, the whole of Ukraine was gasified, the family was a millionaire as a child, so. In our Urals, farms were heated with gas, and collective houses (2-3 collective farm floors)
          1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 12: 44 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            in the Leningrad region, only imported gas was not natural
            1. zadorin1974 21 May 2020 13: 37 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              It all depended on Nastya whether the pipeline runs nearby or not. Friendship and Urengoy-Uzhgorod with their capacities helped all the regions where compressor stations were built.
              1. Nastia makarova 21 May 2020 14: 13 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                the first north stream also helped north west gasify
  • Peter is not the first 21 May 2020 21: 23 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    In the north of Udmurtia there are villages that Gazprom has gasified, but no one is connected to this gas in the village, since the cost of heating with wood is less than heating with gas. These are the paradoxes in forest regions. So the requirement to gasify Siberia can sometimes mean that you need to squander money.
  • Talgarets 21 May 2020 07: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    First, the EU’s “Gas” directive is adopted, which seems to be directed against the Nord Stream, but the Nord Stream gas pipeline is no longer under its influence ... Then, probably, new directives will be adopted against the Nord Stream, etc.
    This battle will become legendary!
  • rocket757 21 May 2020 07: 31 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    They will do it, go around, bring it out ... how many words are for the sake of one, it's just FAVORABLE!
    1. Vasyan1971 21 May 2020 07: 46 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: rocket757
      They will do it, go around, bring it out ... how many words are for the sake of one, it's just FAVORABLE!

      For all normal people. Not for Poles, tribals and other Ukrainians. request
      1. rocket757 21 May 2020 08: 08 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Those already have nowhere to go, and they are used to the fact that their big boss is “trampling” from behind. "bastard wife" is already a stigma.
    2. Polite Moose 21 May 2020 08: 27 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      They will do it, go around, bring it out ... how many words are for the sake of one, it's just FAVORABLE!

      And, finally, the Germans had the wisdom to realize and the courage to declare that it’s enough for them to step on testicles themselves and incur losses from the stupid pro-American policy of the European Union.
      PS I think that we still remember with kind words old Merkel. She, before the demobilization, hangs on herself all the dogs, such as removing the joint venture from the EU directives, completing the joint venture-2, exiting the anti-Russian sanctions regime, etc. And he will leave, leaving his successor a completely cleared glade in the economy. And what to take from the chancellor with the prefix "ex"? Only "drink hands".
      1. rocket757 21 May 2020 09: 39 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Great political games!
        There will be a winner, there will be a loser! Fifti-fifti, hardly anyone will be satisfied.
        1. Polite Moose 21 May 2020 09: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          Great political games!

          That's right.
          Quote: rocket757
          There will be a winner, there will be a loser!

          If we take only Russia and Germany, then both parties will benefit from bringing gas transit to mind. And by the checkout, unequivocally, fly n-ss, psh-ki and x-hl.
          1. rocket757 21 May 2020 09: 49 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            With stripes, everything is clear, there they are specifically benefiting. With the rest it’s very cool, because they work for cookies ... or rather, for the crumbs from the pie, which their boss intends to devour in one !!! Joke!
            1. Polite Moose 21 May 2020 10: 13 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: rocket757
              With the rest it’s very cool, because they work for cookies ...

              Not only everyone can afford to pursue an independent policy. Few can do this.
              1. rocket757 21 May 2020 10: 38 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                This is understandable, this is a real politician! But the degree of free \ not free, the concrete definition also matters.
    3. Svetlana 21 May 2020 08: 34 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Yes, it’s profitable. Favorably Germany and Russia.
      1. rocket757 21 May 2020 09: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Cooperation on an equal footing should be beneficial ... it wasn’t worth it in any other way.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Muvka 21 May 2020 08: 15 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      The court dismissed the Nord Stream 2 lawsuit, and the Nord Stream withdrawn. Everything is written correctly.
    3. Avior 21 May 2020 10: 42 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      court decision in this case
      https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-05/cp200062en.pdf
  • Mouse 21 May 2020 07: 33 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    If you really want .... then you can!
  • aszzz888 21 May 2020 07: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I recall that previously there was a similar fuss - it was introduced, then displayed .... request
  • AML
    AML 21 May 2020 08: 02 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Civil
    What a humiliation to beg to buy gas for the gay people. Otherwise, the budget does not fit ... tighten the belts, unite around the party and government. By 2050, we will take first place in the sale of gas to the cursed West.

    Well, let's go ahead and refuse to supply gas to the West at all. Do you think they will sit quietly at the opera when they don’t have enough gas?
  • prior 21 May 2020 08: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    It is necessary to answer the Directive to the Directive - in December, at the same time, reduce the filling of all pipelines going to Europe to zero while raising the price of gas every 10 times.
    To dance, so to dance.
  • arhitroll 21 May 2020 08: 34 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Nastia Makarova
    a gas pipeline to every village?

    Yes!
    1. your1970 21 May 2020 08: 50 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Since 2001 we have the entire district gasified, all the villages ....

      One small one, unfortunately, even had to be dismantled: the elderly died, the youth left
      1. T.Henks 21 May 2020 09: 20 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The lucky ones. But they don’t lead to mine. Although the highway is 3 km. And about fifteen Muscovites live.
        1. your1970 21 May 2020 09: 55 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: T.Henks
          But they don’t lead to mine. Although the highway is 3 km.
          - and they won’t lead. Because the land for construction needs to be redeemed, and if agricultural land is a pipe at all. Given that this is the vicinity of Moscow, the price will be crazy. Even we have a devil on a cake in the province - not a penny thing ....
          And there are a bunch of extremely expensive nuances - a certified seamless gas pipe (which stands like gun barrels), maintenance and service staff.
          All together results in such amounts of gasification - that the local population will not pull it in their particular home, which makes senseless attempts to start gasifying you.
          Here, our head almost sat down because of this dead village - everyone understood that he was dying, parted all the same, but there was such a cry and complaints were written to all authorities that the governor forced our head to allocate part of the district’s funds to support its gasification. 10 years have passed and the same the complainants began to write- "yes, the head didn’t see something or that she wouldn’t be there soon ?? how dare he spend the money on a hopeless village ??" .The case of misuse was opened but closed due to the lack of an event.

          Nonetheless, over the past 30 years there have been 2 times more gasified settlements than in the entire USSR
  • Mouse 21 May 2020 08: 36 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    And we will go the other way ... lol
  • Andrei Nikolaevich 21 May 2020 08: 41 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If WEIGHT is all so smart, then let them build a gas pipeline for their own money.
    1. knyf 21 May 2020 14: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      So the proportion of them from JV in SP2 is higher than ours. The point is not in the EU, but in the striped.
  • GMM
    GMM 21 May 2020 09: 07 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    1. And when the gas runs out, what will we sell?
    2. When they completely refuse our gas, what should I do?
    1. T.Henks 21 May 2020 09: 21 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      When it’s over, our bones will already rot.
  • Alien From 21 May 2020 09: 17 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Well, Europeans love the Kama Sutra. They raped themselves))
  • Junior Private 21 May 2020 10: 30 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The liberals have already begun to howl on the Internet: "Well, they will fully download SP-2 - one hell, all the money for yachts will be taken away." An interesting chronic position of the chronic "opposition" is that in any case, everything is bad with them. In a word - ... liberals.
  • Junior Private 21 May 2020 10: 41 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: rocket757
    ... how many words for one, it's just FAVORABLE!

    Ordinary robbery differs from democratic robbery in that the latter is hiding behind pompous words. Here they are "non-volatility, competitiveness ..."
  • Pvi1206 21 May 2020 11: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it’s clear that the matter is dark ... but the caravan is moving forward ...
  • Old26 21 May 2020 12: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Break through
    Not bad. The second stream will also output wink

    Just the second and not output. If the construction of the EU gas directive were completed before the entry into force, there would be no questions. The only option is the court. Although there are many chances that the decision will not be in our favor

    Quote: prior
    It is necessary to answer the Directive to the Directive - in December, at the same time, reduce the filling of all pipelines going to Europe to zero while raising the price of gas every 10 times.
    To dance, so to dance.

    Young !!! Good girl !!! Giant thoughts !!! And you yourself will pay the penalty out of your pocket ???
    You should not consider “partners” in contracts, in business so stupid. That, like this, you can “tame” them with a stroke of the pen. Such agreements spell out everything. And not only force majeure, but also FULFILLMENT the other side of their obligations. And for this they usually punish the ruble (dollar, euro)
    1. T.Henks 21 May 2020 13: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      So I would like to know how these Swiss people are responsible for refusing to lay the pipe with their ruble. So far, only Russia is responsible for everything. And for everyone.
    2. Radius 21 May 2020 16: 18 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      And you yourself will pay the penalty out of your pocket ???
      You should not consider “partners” in contracts, in business so stupid. That, like this, you can “tame” them with a stroke of the pen. Such agreements spell out everything. And not only force majeure, but also FULFILLMENT the other side of their obligations. And for this they usually punish the ruble (dollar, euro)


      And the lawyers, for what? Why sign something that will ultimately prove unprofitable? See above:
      "the nouveau riche is unbearable - money is fast, money is fast ..."
  • Kestrel 21 May 2020 12: 46 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Germany defends its interests, indirectly defending the interests of the Russian Federation, which in general is good for both Germany and Russia!
  • Radius 21 May 2020 16: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It seems that gas is not pancakes that need to be sold quickly, while hot. You can wait a while, wait for a good price. Only our nouveau riche is unbearable - money is fast, money is fast ...
  • Vladimir SHajkin 22 May 2020 01: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Weather conditions are inconsistent, and at the turn of the century and due to global changes, cyclonic fronts have changed both in terms of passage and strength. Of course, no one knows how events will develop in which direction, but they need to be completed. A holiday will come on our street and they themselves will cancel their directives and be asked to fill 150%