The Ukrainian side reported the death of the commander of the battalion "Lugansk-1"

99
The Ukrainian side reported the death of the commander of the battalion "Lugansk-1"

Another aggravation in the area of ​​the demarcation line in the Donbass manifests itself these days - on the sixth anniversary of the outbreak of armed conflict. The shootout manifests itself both in Donetsk and in Lugansk directions.

The Ukrainian side publishes data that suffered losses. In particular, the deceased commander of the battalion "Lugansk-1" is reported. The name of this person is Sergey Gubanov. According to the Ukrainian side, Gubanov received a shrapnel wound in the vicinity of the village of Trekhizbenka (Novoaydarsky district). It happened in the evening - around 22:30 Moscow time. It is added that three more Ukrainian security officials were injured.



When journalists asked representatives of the National Police of Ukraine to clarify under what specific circumstances the battalion commander was killed, no explanation was given. They got off with the general phrase: "Circumstances are being clarified."

At the same time, representatives of the LPR in the Joint Center for the Control and Coordination of the Ceasefire Report on violations by the Ukrainian side. It is noted that the Ukrainian military fired on the territory of the village of Kalinovka. In this case, LNG was used - an easel anti-tank grenade launcher.

Meanwhile, the military intelligence of the DPR received information about activity in Ukrainian positions. So, the APU is engaged in the transfer of air defense systems, tanks and other military equipment in the territory adjacent directly to residential buildings of settlements in the territory of Donbass controlled by them. In particular, two armored vehicles and one air defense system are located in the Broad Beam, three air defense systems - in Konstantinovka, two air defense systems - in Kalinovo. Also, two APU tanks were delivered to Grigorovka. In Mironovka concentrated 7 infantry fighting vehicles.

Recall that on the eve of the authorities of the DPR and LPR ordered to increase the combat readiness of the republican troops in connection with obtaining information about the new activity of the Ukrainian military along the demarcation line.
  • National Police of Ukraine
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

99 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    21 May 2020 07: 00
    Another bury was scorched. good
    1. +15
      21 May 2020 07: 07
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Another bury was scorched. good

      Most likely they got drunk again, in the Armed Forces of Ukraine they like to write off the victims of drunken showdowns for combat losses negative
      1. +3
        21 May 2020 07: 10
        Do you want to say the trophies are not divided? feel
        1. +8
          21 May 2020 07: 13
          Most likely he found it difficult to answer the traditional question in such situations: - "Do you respect me?" request
          1. +2
            21 May 2020 07: 24
            Quote: Hto tama
            Most likely he found it difficult to answer the question: - "Do you respect me?"
            Or "Crimea is ours?" feel
          2. +2
            21 May 2020 08: 16
            Quote: Hto tama
            Most likely he found it difficult to answer the traditional question in such situations: - "Do you respect me?"

            Most likely I could not quickly and clearly answer whose Crimea ...
        2. +17
          21 May 2020 07: 53
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          Do you want to say the trophies are not divided?

          What trophies can they have if they do not go forward and are not involved in a direct clash with the Luhansk people?

          UNDERSTANDING WITH FORMULATIONS!

          Do not well-mindedcall trophies ...
          1. +2
            21 May 2020 08: 47
            Quote: Insurgent
            It’s not necessary to call it trophy.

            Robbers, Moroders, rapists. There are no trophies in a civil war.
            1. +20
              21 May 2020 08: 57
              Quote: tihonmarine
              There are no trophies in a civil war.

              About what "civil war" you speak belay ? How much can this stupidity be duplicated?

              Is it not clear that since the referendum on independence from Ukraine, DPR and LPR "de facto"(unfortunately not yet"de jure"but soon Yes become) DO NOT ARE THE TERRITORY OF UKRAINE, and we, the owners of passports of the republics and the Russian Federation-are no longer its citizens ???.

              Actually, the "Square" itself considers us as such ...
              1. 0
                21 May 2020 09: 48
                Quote: Insurgent
                What "civil war" are you talking about?

                Sorry, wrong. This means a war of conquest. I figured it out here, but I still don’t enter what was the war in Western Ukraine after 1944.
                1. +11
                  21 May 2020 10: 07
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                   I figured it out, but I still don’t enter what was the war in Western Ukraine after 1944.

                  Having difficulty defining terminology?
                  So I will explain to you Yes ...

                  That in Western Ukraine, that in other regions of the USSR, during the Second World War, and at some interval after it, a struggle was fought (not war!) Against the gangster and nationalist underground, and the fascist shortcomings ...
                  1. 0
                    21 May 2020 10: 36
                    Quote: Insurgent
                    the struggle (not war!) with the gangster and nationalist underground, and the fascist shortcomings.

                    This is clear. So it is from our side, and here is how they look at it from their side.
                    1. +7
                      21 May 2020 10: 42
                      Quote: tihonmarine

                      This is clear. So it is from our side, and here is how they look at it from their side.

                      Why do you need this? Want to engage in dialogue with rabble?

                      We have our own vision of events, supported by the decisions of Nuremberg, the rest of the "opinions" do not sway us. Never...
                      1. +1
                        21 May 2020 13: 44
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        Why do you need this? Want to engage in dialogue with rabble?

                        Yes, no, my father’s brother entered into dialogue in 1945 when he was appointed after the Victory, to Lvov as commander of the NKVD battalion to combat banditry.
                      2. +4
                        21 May 2020 13: 47
                        Quote: tihonmarine
                        Yes, no, my father’s brother entered into dialogue in 1945 when he was appointed after the Victory, to Lvov as commander of the NKVD battalion to combat banditry.

                        So you should definitely understand what these questions are for: " how they look at it for their part" request ...
                      3. 0
                        21 May 2020 14: 01
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        So you should really understand what these questions are for: "how do they look at it from their side"

                        I understand one thing that they did not allow uncle and others to finish the necessary business. And now we are slurping a spoon, and you are especially in Donbas, at how they look on their part. They have a different light perception than people.
                      4. -4
                        21 May 2020 14: 20
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        backed by the decisions of Nuremberg,

                        And what was the decision of Nuremberg for Bandera? As far as is known, they were not recognized there as accomplices of the German Nazis ...
                      5. +4
                        21 May 2020 14: 30
                        Quote: revnagan
                        And what was the decision of Nuremberg for Bandera? As far as is known, they were not recognized there as accomplices of the German Nazis ...

                        And the backbone of the Bandera members of those who served in the SS and the "Galicians" who had not been killed, does not make them automatic to the accomplices of the fascists?
                        It’s clear to me like God's day ...
                      6. 0
                        21 May 2020 15: 54
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        And the backbone of the Bandera members of those who served in the SS and the "Galicians" who had not been killed, does not make them automatic to the accomplices of the fascists?

                        Of course makes not only accomplices, but also killers. But after the Victory, members of the SS formations appeared on the territory of Austria in the zone of occupation of the allies, and although they caused persistent hostility and disgust among the Western allies. All Soviet citizens who were in the service of the Nazi formations, according to the agreements, were to be extradited to the Soviet Union, but the Vatican stood up for Galicia. Do not forget that most of the Ukrainian SS men were Greek Catholics; they were not recognized as citizens of the USSR. The fact that the allies were confused by the status of these people, called Galicians, allowed many of them to avoid forcible deportation to the Soviet Union. Despite the fact that they served as part of the Waffen-SS, and at the end of the war they suddenly declared themselves citizens of Poland. The Polish general Anders proposed to forgive them their past, and given their potential usefulness as true anti-communists, he supported their claims that they are Poles. So that they calmly lived their lives, and the Nuremberg Tribunal did not touch them.
                        It is interesting that in the territory of the Soviet Union there were many former fighters of "Galicia". Some were captured, others returned after the war, deciding that life in exile is not for them. No mass executions took place; most of them, having served their prison term, led the lives of ordinary Soviet citizens in Galicia for many years.
                      7. -3
                        21 May 2020 22: 16
                        Quote: tihonmarine
                        but the Vatican stood up for "Galicia".

                        You are not talking about a little bit. All ersatzSS formation, like the SS itself, were recognized as a criminal organization. We are talking about the crimes of the Bandera UPAR, which Nuremberg did not condemn as accomplices of the Nazi
                      8. -3
                        21 May 2020 22: 14
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        doesn’t automatically make them fascist accomplices?

                        Only "de facto". But you are referring to the decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal, where war criminals were tried. But the UPA was not tried like that request .
                    2. 0
                      21 May 2020 15: 27
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      So it is from our side, and here is how they look at it from their side.


                      Vlad, all the accomplices of Nazi Germany were officially recognized by the "Nuremberg Trial" as criminals, and the Bandera, UNA, UNSO swore allegiance to the Fuhrer and Nazi Germany. So, their "gaze" is the gaze of Hitler's fascist criminals. It is a pity that I have to explain this.
                    3. 0
                      24 May 2020 02: 08
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      and here is how they look at it from their side.

                      I had to talk with the descendant of the beseka general of the OUN underground. Most of all, he boasted that after his release from prison, his grandfather was settled on a collective farm, where he could set himself up so that ordinary collective farmers worked in his place. The war was for the right to have slaves. Then they hoped to have slaves of Western Ukraine, now they dream of mocking at Russian and Eastern Ukrainians. In principle, after 1991, many heads of collective farms and factories in both Russia and Ukraine considered the dream to be feasible that the bosses would exploit ordinary workers with the efficiency of their Western colleagues, and these workers would work with communist enthusiasm like the Chinese.
                2. +1
                  21 May 2020 12: 38
                  What the hell is this diving vest pulled ?!
                  1. 0
                    21 May 2020 13: 40
                    Quote: 210ox
                    What the hell is this diving vest pulled ?!

                    "Ramses" beguiled the Sumer. Wearing Soviet paraphernalia in Ukraine is punishable by law. This is what a decent Sumer should wear.
                3. 0
                  22 May 2020 04: 18
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                  what was the war in Western Ukraine after 1944.

                  Until May 9, 1945, World War II, after the Third World War, which the United States and Great Britain unleashed. Remember Churchill's speech in Fulton.
              2. -7
                21 May 2020 10: 02
                And who recognized the DPR except South Ossetia?
                1. +4
                  21 May 2020 10: 46
                  Quote: Kronos
                  And who recognized the DPR except South Ossetia?

                  And who recognizes the Republic of China (Taiwan), in Europe it is recognized only by the Vatican.
                  1. -6
                    21 May 2020 10: 55
                    Yes the situation is the same no recognition no state
                    1. +5
                      21 May 2020 10: 58
                      Quote: Kronos
                      Yes the situation is the same no recognition no state

                      А we will be the state,united Russian state...
                      1. +3
                        21 May 2020 11: 27
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        And we will be a state, a single Russian state ...

                        Whatever it is now, it will come to this anyway. It should be so.
                      2. -9
                        21 May 2020 11: 43
                        Russia only needs the rest of Crimea so that Ukraine does not join NATO
                      3. -9
                        21 May 2020 14: 23
                        Quote: Insurgent
                        And we will be a state, a single Russian state ...

                        Mandatory In parallel measurement laughing .If Russia needed Crimea, they already recognized it as theirs (though no one in the world agrees with this anymore. Even Belarus. Any unrecognized Ossetia laughing - RF puppets do not count). And you were needed as a compress to delay heat from the Crimea.
                    2. NKT
                      +1
                      21 May 2020 12: 08
                      Is recognition itself a legal necessity and how does it correlate with international law?

                      If, for example, international laws are violated, but a majority of states recognize independence. Is this recognition an indulgence? Or another situation, international law is not violated, but again, the majority does not recognize the independence of the country. What then? People do not have the right to self-determination and all because of some handful of politicians?
                      1. -1
                        21 May 2020 12: 10
                        Recognition is necessary, for example, then, so that other states conduct business with you, such as trade, and military operations against the DPR were impossible with world recognition
                      2. NKT
                        0
                        21 May 2020 12: 19
                        And how is world recognition measured? By the number of states, their area or the number of people living there? Is there any order? You understand that “international” recognition does not correlate with international law.
                        It is ridiculous to hear from Western "democracies" about the non-recognition of the republics, since international law was violated.
                      3. +2
                        21 May 2020 12: 21
                        Quote: NKT
                        Is recognition itself a legal necessity and how does it correlate with international law?


                        And fig knows ... Now, after the "Kosovo precedent", the so-called "international law" has been given up. Therefore, looking back at him is not respecting yourself ...
                2. avg
                  +3
                  21 May 2020 12: 55
                  Quote: Kronos
                  And who recognized the DPR except South Ossetia?

                  I admitted that all my relatives, friends and acquaintances, as well as their friends and acquaintances ... I hope to get to the government soon. (and better now than to the election)
                  1. 0
                    21 May 2020 18: 52
                    I meant the leadership of which countries?
                3. 0
                  21 May 2020 18: 50
                  Quote: Kronos
                  And who recognized the DPR except South Ossetia?

                  I admitted. What's next?
                4. 0
                  24 May 2020 02: 11
                  Quote: Kronos
                  And who recognized the DPR except South Ossetia?

                  The USSR, Mongolia, the DPRK and the PRC of the USA also did not recognize for a long time.
              3. 0
                21 May 2020 12: 24
                Quote: Insurgent
                Is it not clear that since the referendum on independence from Ukraine, DPR and LPR "de facto"

                Nevertheless, the conflict actually began as a civil war, what you write about (about the referendum) was after Slavyansk.
                1. +4
                  21 May 2020 12: 42
                  Quote: DenZ
                  Nevertheless, the conflict actually began as a civil war, what you write about (about the referendum) was after Slavyansk.

                  The conflict started as punitive operation Kiev against the unarmed Donbass, and only then everything turned into a war.

                  And how much was that "civil war" from the moment the "ATO" was announced (on April 14, the text of the decree No. 405/2014 was posted on the website of the President of Ukraine) to the referendum on May 11?
              4. -6
                21 May 2020 14: 17
                Quote: Insurgent
                Is it not clear that since the referendum on independence from Ukraine, DPR and LPR "de facto"

                It is not clear, because local referendums have no legal force in matters of the territorial structure of the state. Such issues are resolved at the level of a referendum of the entire state. Chechnya, how many referenda on "independence" have been held, and so what?
                Quote: Insurgent
                DO NOT ARE THE TERRITORY OF UKRAINE, and we, the holders of passports of the republics and the Russian Federation, are no longer its citizens

                If residents of 1/3 of Lugansk and 1/3 of Donetsk regions, changing passports from Ukrainian to Russian, decided that the territory in which they live became Russian from this, then they are deeply mistaken. Next to them, (possibly on the same landing ), citizens live with TWO passports. Russian and Ukrainian. Just in case. Or, say, purely Ukrainian. And now, does Ukraine belong to the region of the Russian Federation where Russian passports were printed and issued? The territory of Ukraine is the territory of Ukraine, and the fact that there were Russian citizens then they did it at their own peril and risk. And if something bad happens on Russian territory with Russian citizens, then this is primarily the fault of the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Russian government, which did not prohibit their citizens from going to the conflict zone.
                1. -1
                  22 May 2020 04: 31
                  Quote: revnagan
                  that local referenda have no legal force

                  After February 21, 2014, such a state as "Ukraine" LEGALLY does not exist, because an armed, unconstitutional coup took place there and people were free to do anything, incl. change the territory of the so-called "Ukraine".
                  Why is it possible to separate in Kosovo, but not in Lugansk and Donetsk?
                  1. 0
                    22 May 2020 07: 45
                    And why was it impossible to separate from Chechnya?
                  2. -3
                    22 May 2020 08: 17
                    Quote: bistrov.
                    After February 21, 2014, such a state as "Ukraine" LEGALLY does not exist, because an armed, unconstitutional coup took place there and people were free to do anything, incl. change the territory of the so-called "Ukraine".

                    What are you stop : What about "the best choice of the Ukrainian people"? belay But what about "our Ukrainian partners"? Or did you personally decide this for yourself? Did you agree with your president? Whom YOU chose. He does not think so. And the UN does not think so. And the world community. So
                    Quote: bistrov.
                    there is no such state as "Ukraine" LEGALLY

                    this is your private, personal, and absolutely incorrect and nobody's interesting opinion.
                2. 0
                  24 May 2020 02: 18
                  Quote: revnagan
                  The territory of Ukraine is the territory of Ukraine

                  At one time, George Washington was also the leader of illegal separatist groups. Now he is honored and respected in the former metropolis as an outstanding politician and commander who fought for the democratic reconstruction of the world. In eastern Ukraine, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Security Service of Ukraine are still considered by many to be punishers, sadists and bandits ready to kill their own mother for dollars.
              5. +1
                21 May 2020 14: 26
                It is CIVIL as if it was not denied the Kiev government and you are with them.
              6. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          21 May 2020 15: 36
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          Do you want to say the trophies are not divided?

          The fact of the matter is that the representatives of the national police, "got off with a general phrase:" The circumstances are being clarified. " Not a word about the "death of a hero." And in the photo, judging by the appearance, a typical "brother" from the 90s.
      2. KCA
        +2
        21 May 2020 07: 33
        It is necessary for journalists to talk to the relatives of the "militiamen killed by shelling", official representatives only talk about combat losses, but the relatives receive notifications where it is written that he was poisoned with methanol, died in a drunken fight, etc., someone would want relatives insurance for pay combat losses?
        1. 0
          21 May 2020 07: 38
          Quote: KCA
          It is necessary for journalists to talk to the relatives of the "militiamen killed by shelling", official representatives only talk about combat losses, but the relatives receive notifications where it is written that he was poisoned with methanol, died in a drunken fight, etc., someone would want relatives insurance for pay combat losses?

          Not a fact! It's the same gold mine how much you can steal without paying extra to relatives Yes so u can be attributed to war hi
          1. KCA
            +1
            21 May 2020 07: 50
            It’s just not paying extra to relatives that they need insurance, and relatives should be informed about the negligence of the deceased
          2. -1
            21 May 2020 08: 50
            Quote: Hto tama
            This is a gold mine, how much can be stolen without paying extra to relatives, so that a mustache can be attributed to war

            Children from the outskirts do not need to be taught that; they themselves will teach whom they want. It’s time to open courses for the gay men and children of Uncle Sam.
    2. 0
      22 May 2020 11: 34
      Rather, the reason for the departure to another world is diabetes and obesity.
  2. +3
    21 May 2020 07: 02
    what a pig on a photo
  3. +13
    21 May 2020 07: 13
    Gubanov was blown up by his own grenade. Perhaps I caught the "squirrel", but it turned out to be more agile. This is normal for the APU.
    1. +1
      21 May 2020 08: 56
      Quote: Valery Valery
      Gubanov was blown up on his own grenade.

      Well, here's the story about the chimpanzee again.
    2. +2
      21 May 2020 13: 19
      Quote: Valery Valery
      Gubanov was blown up by his own grenade. Perhaps I caught the "squirrel", but it turned out to be more agile. This is normal for the APU.


      И
      More specific information from dill sources:

      According to the statement of Avakov's department https://www.facebook.com/UA.National.Police/photos/a.1768074770113996/2574004482854350/?type=3&theater, he died of shrapnel wounds "while performing a mission." Also in this episode there were 3 more 300s.
      Gubanov and his group were blown up on an anti-personnel mine near Trekhizbenka, after which he died from shrapnel wounds in the hospital.


      I suppose that the mine could be from the MES or OZM series ...
  4. +10
    21 May 2020 07: 15
    Another replenishment of dung hundreds. Good luck lol
  5. +4
    21 May 2020 07: 18
    Again, "non-combat losses" will try to push them to the militia ... Did you have fun with a grenade? After "a liter of drunk"?
    And now frantically compose a legend? I believe in it. In a successful hit of the militia - not really. They mainly return fire ... and what to do to the battalion commander at the firing position?
    1. +1
      21 May 2020 08: 22
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Again, "non-combat losses" will try to push them to the militia ... Did you have fun with a grenade? After "a liter of drunk"?

      Let them all get drunk and die!
    2. +2
      21 May 2020 09: 00
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Again, "non-combat losses" will try to push them to the militia ... Did you have fun with a grenade?

      I do not understand that they have no other toys except a grenade?
      1. 0
        21 May 2020 09: 34
        Quote: tihonmarine
        I do not understand that they have no other toys except a grenade?

        Well, there is also a grenade from the grenade. But she has a fuse with an inertial fuse. But the offensive is just right. The fragments are weak and fly not far away. All other "toys" are much more powerful, and there would be more deaths ...
        1. +3
          21 May 2020 09: 52
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Well, there’s still a grenade from a grenade launcher.

          This one won’t work, for a toy it’s a hefty difficult one for garnets.
      2. 0
        21 May 2020 22: 04
        Yes, a perky roulette called "Hammer"!
  6. +6
    21 May 2020 07: 23
    Judging by the name and surname, it seems to be Russian! Well ... is it the fate of the Russians ... to die for the "Waltzmans", "Mendels", "Epsteins"?
    1. +4
      21 May 2020 07: 37
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Judging by the name-surname, it seems to be Russian!

      Come on, you! We And Poroshenko, and Tymoshenko judging by the surname well, such Ukrainians !!!!!
      1. +2
        21 May 2020 09: 04
        Quote: Egoza
        We have both Poroshenko and Tymoshenko judging by the surname well, such Ukrainians !!

        Yes, you have there by the last name for sure "you can't tell whether he is good or bad ..."
    2. Hey
      +4
      21 May 2020 07: 37
      Judging by the name and surname, it seems to be Russian! Well ... is it the fate of the Russians ... to die for the "Waltzmans", "Mendels", "Epsteins"?

      And this happened as soon as they abandoned their Gods and recognized their religion.
      1. +1
        21 May 2020 11: 05
        I know that they are throwing minuses, but anyway, did you think about, but what if we did not accept Christianity? What would happen to Russia? ...
        1. Hey
          +1
          21 May 2020 14: 02
          if we had not accepted Christianity ?, what would happen to Russia? ...

          As in the old days, shields would be nailed to the gates of different cities. And the lack of Christianity did not stop us from doing this. Always ask yourself and others the question of who Jesus Christ came to and why, and what the Russians have to do with it.
        2. 0
          22 May 2020 08: 19
          Quote: Maks Winter
          I know that they are throwing minuses, but anyway, did you think about what if we did not accept Christianity? What would happen to Russia ?.

          I thought about it. If we had not accepted Christianity, we would have accepted Islam.
    3. +2
      21 May 2020 07: 38
      They jump, and the waltzman has the money. And they will not get it, because "they are not suckers."
      1. +3
        21 May 2020 09: 05
        Quote: Alex Nevs
        They jump, and then the money is at the valtsman.

        And where on earth is there a place where the money is not from the "waltzman"?
  7. +3
    21 May 2020 07: 33
    In particular, two armored vehicles and one air defense system are located in the Broad Beam, three air defense systems - in Konstantinovka, two air defense systems - in Kalinovo

    Are they going to reflect the air raids there?
    1. +2
      21 May 2020 08: 36
      Quote: Talgarets
      Are they going to reflect the air raids there?

      So they are fighting with "Russia" !!! For 6 years everyone has been fighting, fighting. The most powerful army in Europe. wassat
      And how to fight with Russia without old air defense systems? She has airplanes! Well, how does it strike from the air?
      What if the "curators" notice that there is no air defense in the positions? They will immediately think that ukrovermacht DOES NOT BELIEVE in any war with Russia.
    2. +5
      21 May 2020 09: 06
      Quote: Talgarets
      Are they going to reflect the air raids there?

      The next Boeing is awaiting.
      1. 0
        21 May 2020 22: 06
        Also thought about it, but so dumb already dumb! hi
  8. +8
    21 May 2020 07: 36
    Combat is a loss or non-combat, what's the difference? The main thing is minus another ukrobandit
  9. +1
    21 May 2020 07: 42
    When journalists asked representatives of the National Police of Ukraine to clarify under what specific circumstances the battalion commander was killed, no explanation was given. They got off with the general phrase: "Circumstances are being clarified."
    In a drunken showdown. laughing (minus 1 !!!!!)
  10. +1
    21 May 2020 08: 40
    Everything is old, like the world under the moon.
    Waltzmanns, Kolomoisky, Zelensky, Trumps, Biden fight for the loot,
    Gubanov, Panasenki, Ivanov perish .....
    1. 0
      21 May 2020 09: 12
      Quote: prior
      Waltzmanns, Kolomoisky, Zelensky, Trumps, Biden fight for the loot,
      Gubanovs, Panasenks, Ivanovs perish ...

      But with the former it’s clear, for the loot, but with the latter it’s not quite. I do not think that the Gubanovs and Bandera dying just like that.
  11. +3
    21 May 2020 08: 46
    The paradox is that the greatest losses are in percentage terms in Dnipropetrovsk oblast. Russian Bandera turned out to be more stubborn than zapadenskaya evil spirits, which fled to earn money in geyropu.nu and this cheroy land glassy.
    1. +3
      21 May 2020 11: 21
      For everything in this life you have to pay, for your stupidity, betrayal (of your homeland, your land, ancestors, beliefs) - too. Sometimes the fee is high and without change, even a trifle. Until 70% of the population understands this, it will only get worse and worse, you will see that convinced ukropatriots will fight duels for men, the ratio outweighs it.
      1. 0
        21 May 2020 11: 44
        This pathetics in reality is only a choice and its consequences
  12. +1
    21 May 2020 08: 54
    These are all our people who could bring benefits, but now they perished because the United States has no warriors, their people do not die
    1. -3
      21 May 2020 09: 57
      Quote: Incompetent
      These are all our people who could bring benefits, but now they perished because the United States has no warriors, their people do not die

      It will not always be like this
  13. +4
    21 May 2020 08: 55
    I had a moment, on a construction site I worked part time with one general of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Two jeeps in the garage plus a son and a personal one. There was not enough money for salaries and material. I’ll bring it in a day - you just need to drive it into the ATO zone. He brought it, but the amount is not small - 50 tys. Baku. The question is where did he get them.
    I would shoot such without a twinge of conscience. Only on the spot I can’t, and so in the SBU under control. And I can’t leave Mother to leave for Homeland to Siberia. I won’t pull the money with me to take with me.
  14. 0
    21 May 2020 10: 03
    Great news!
  15. +2
    21 May 2020 11: 17
    Not every shard will fly past such a hog, not every bullet will whistle. It was necessary to eat less, and to run more.
  16. +1
    21 May 2020 12: 14
    In particular, two armored vehicles and one air defense system are located in the Broad Beam, three air defense systems - in Konstantinovka, two air defense systems - in Kalinovo.
    Where so many boenges to collect?
  17. +1
    21 May 2020 13: 08
    In any war, in any military operations there is a principle - if you shoot, then they shoot at you. It would seem that everything is simple and clear to anyone, but not to the Ukrainian side. Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine regularly fire at the positions of the LPR and the DPR, and plant cannons at towns and villages behind the front line. But as soon as the answer comes, they begin to be very offended. Like, how is it that we have the right to shoot, but we can’t shoot at us.
  18. +2
    21 May 2020 14: 41
    Quote: tihonmarine
    Quote: Insurgent
    the struggle (not war!) with the gangster and nationalist underground, and the fascist shortcomings.

    This is clear. So it is from our side, and here is how they look at it from their side.

    Yes, do not care how they look at it. It has long been necessary to get used to the fact that our opinion is a priority. Other opinions are not considered.
    1. 0
      22 May 2020 07: 55
      That is why humanity is fighting that there are people who believe that there is only one correct opinion.
  19. +2
    21 May 2020 15: 21
    Let the new holes in the cemetery dig. Everything is numb to them. And the equipment between the houses is hidden, like the Nazis in the war ....
  20. +2
    21 May 2020 17: 14
    The land is glassy, ​​fascist.
  21. 0
    21 May 2020 22: 23
    He did not live to see the trial.
  22. 0
    21 May 2020 22: 43
    Minus one famous rubber item of intimate purpose))

    By the way, there is a training ground in Trekhizbenka, I was there before the war. Most likely a non-combat loss, another "hammer" tore or something like that. So don't fucking shove it on the People's Militia)
  23. 0
    22 May 2020 20: 49
    Fuck not to get up, what a pity!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"