The deadlines for the return of the Moscow missile cruiser to operation became known.

The deadlines for the return of the Moscow missile cruiser to operation became known.

Completion of repair of the flagship of the Black Sea fleet Guards Order Nakhimov missile cruiser "Moscow" is scheduled for June 26. This was reported by the press service of the 13th ship repair plant in Sevastopol.


Now the cruiser is in the dock of the Sevastopol 13th Shipyard, where it was delivered on April 22 of this year after the repair and restoration of field readiness. At present, the plant’s specialists carry out dock repair and maintenance of the ship.

The cruiser is now in the North Dock of Sevastopol. (...) Repair work is going according to plan. In accordance with it, the end of the dock repair is scheduled for June 26

- announced at the 13th shipyard.

As previously reported, the cruiser’s full technical readiness will be restored by July this year, after which the “Moscow” will pass the required tests and at the end of summer will go to the Mediterranean Sea, where it will become part of the permanent group of the Russian Navy.

The previous time the cruiser was on a long hike from September 2015 to January 2016. The ship provided air defense from the sea direction of the Russian air base Khmeimim in Syria.

The cruiser "Moscow" was laid on the stocks of the Nikolaev shipbuilding plant named after the 61 communard in the 1976 year as the Slava missile cruiser, is the leading missile in the series of missile cruisers. Launched 27 July 1979 g., Was put into operation in 1983 year. Displacement - 11380 tons. It is equipped with 16 launchers of Vulkan missiles, artillery, air defense systems, torpedo tubes and depth-fire bombs.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 13: 22 New
    • 19
    • 1
    +18
    37 years in service! Veteran! hi And traditionally - 7 feet under the keel!
    1. Civil 19 May 2020 13: 39 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      37 years in service! Veteran! hi And traditionally - 7 feet under the keel!


      1. Either upgrade. There is already a lot of things outdated, but worst of all is not produced and there are no spare parts for them.
      2. Or as a naval museum. You can not even demilitarize and use it as a training ship.
    2. novel66 19 May 2020 13: 52 New
      • 14
      • 5
      +9
      Sentry must:
      do not leave the post until it is replaced or removed, even if his life is in danger; Unauthorized resignation is a crime against military service;

      but there’s no shift
      1. Sky strike fighter 19 May 2020 13: 54 New
        • 5
        • 8
        -3
        But over time, a shift is planned. 22350M.
        1. novel66 19 May 2020 14: 07 New
          • 18
          • 3
          +15
          what does it mean over time ???
          Art. 162. Change of sentries is made in 2 hours, in an even or odd hour.
        2. Nemchinov Vl 19 May 2020 20: 37 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          But with time change is planned. 22350M.
          with the terms of construction of NK first rank ?! This is probably fourteen plus years, judging by the size of 22350M in relation to 22350 (these are still in 10+ mode) ....?!
      2. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 14: 04 New
        • 14
        • 12
        +2
        Quote: novel xnumx
        but there’s no shift

        But in the "Star" tanker collected ... All for sale!
        PS Sailors from the Aurora are interested in when there will be a modernization ....
        If something is powerless sarcasm from despair.
        1. novel66 19 May 2020 14: 05 New
          • 13
          • 11
          +2
          Aurora is easier - to put new guns, load coal - and into battle ... on the Winter ...
          1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 14: 21 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            The main crew - revolutionary sailors! And Zheleznyak on guard.
            1. ABM
              ABM 19 May 2020 14: 52 New
              • 8
              • 2
              +6
              "he went to Odessa, but went to Kherson,
              The ambush "
              (Partizan Zheleznyak S)
              - with a navigator like that Zheleznyak ...
              1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 15: 00 New
                • 5
                • 4
                +1
                Quote: ABM
                that Zheleznyak ..

                This is song lyrics ...
                And here is that "The guard is tired!" - it is already effective!
                1. novel66 19 May 2020 21: 01 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  and a bayonet who did not understand
              2. Grits 20 May 2020 05: 24 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: ABM
                with a navigator like that Zheleznyak ...

                It was harder to navigate in the steppe
          2. Bashkirkhan 19 May 2020 14: 38 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            Quote: novel xnumx
            Aurora is easier - to put new guns, load coal - and into battle ... on the Winter ...

            To shoot at the Hermitage from a six-inch, this is my friend insanity.
            1. novel66 19 May 2020 14: 42 New
              • 8
              • 3
              +5
              no, ordinary barbarism .... the revolution will write everything off
              1. Senior seaman 19 May 2020 15: 09 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Worse. An ordinary newspaper duck, which many still believe.
                1. novel66 19 May 2020 15: 13 New
                  • 6
                  • 1
                  +5
                  why not support the assault with artillery?
                  1. Senior seaman 19 May 2020 15: 29 New
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    +11
                    Letter to the editors
                    To all honest citizens of the city of Petrograd from the team of the cruiser Aurora, which expresses its sharp protest over the abandoned charges, especially the charges not verified, but throwing a spot of shame on the cruiser’s team. We declare that we did not come to smash the Winter Palace, not to kill civilians, but to defend and, if necessary, die for freedom and revolution from the counter-revolutionaries.
                    The press writes that the Aurora opened fire on the Winter Palace, but did Messrs. reporters know that the fire we opened from the guns would not leave a stone on the stone not only of the Winter Palace, but also of the streets adjacent to it. But is it really there. Is it not a lie, to throw the usual method of the bourgeois press with mud and the thoroughness of the facts of incidents to plot the working proletariat. We are contacting you, we are workers and soldiers of the city of Petrograd. Do not believe the provocative rumors. Do not believe them that we are traitors and rioters, but check the rumors of reality themselves. As for the shots from the cruiser, only one blank shot was fired from a 6-inch gun, indicating a signal for all vessels standing on the Neva and calling them to vigilance and readiness.
                    We ask all editions to reprint.
                    Chairman of the ship committee A. BELYSHEV. Comrade Chairman P. ANDREEV.
                    1. novel66 19 May 2020 15: 48 New
                      • 5
                      • 4
                      +1
                      looks like excuse
                      1. Peter is not the first 19 May 2020 17: 26 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        The excuse is confirmed by the number of victims during the storming of the Winter Palace:
                        According to some, only six soldiers and one drummer of the female battalion were killed during the assault. According to others, there were much more victims - at least a few dozen.

                        So the Aurora certainly didn’t shoot at the palace. But from the Peter and Paul Fortress there were hits.
                      2. Senior seaman 19 May 2020 17: 30 New
                        • 10
                        • 0
                        +10
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        looks like

                        the desire to scratch where it does not itch.
                        In all sources (even emigrant, like Melgunov) it is written that "Aurora" produced one blank shot.
                  2. Terenin 19 May 2020 17: 23 New
                    • 10
                    • 0
                    +10
                    Quote: novel xnumx
                    why not support the assault with artillery?

                    hi
                    The real gunner, when sneezing, rolls back two meters winked .
                    1. Svarog51 19 May 2020 20: 03 New
                      • 7
                      • 0
                      +7
                      Gene hi A real watch post is guarded until its death or before the shift. Here is an example. Nine years at the post.
                      https://moya-planeta.ru/travel/view/bessmennyj_chasovoj_9_let_pod_zemlej_9775
                      1. novel66 19 May 2020 20: 50 New
                        • 7
                        • 0
                        +7
                        where did you steal it from the marine theme?
                      2. Svarog51 19 May 2020 20: 56 New
                        • 7
                        • 0
                        +7
                        And what? Are they not on guard duty in the Navy? I didn’t raise this topic, but as a veteran of a security company, I had to clarify this.
                        And as regards the cruiser, I’m only in favor of returning to service. “It will not spoil the furrows,” but it will give time for preparing a replacement. I don’t see another.
                      3. novel66 19 May 2020 20: 59 New
                        • 6
                        • 0
                        +6
                        replacement where ????
                      4. Svarog51 20 May 2020 02: 40 New
                        • 6
                        • 0
                        +6
                        Do you think I'm commanding the shipbuilding industry? You are mistaken. I can only guess and hope.
                      5. Grits 20 May 2020 05: 29 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        replacement where ????

                        In the near future is not even expected. Super Gorshkov will pull on the destroyer, but not on the cruiser. The shipbuilding industry has degraded to the level of boats, corvettes and, to a maximum, frigates.
              2. novel66 19 May 2020 20: 49 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                gene hi from personal observations? lol
    3. Aviator_ 19 May 2020 22: 35 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Why on Winter. There is no government there now. Capitalist ministers gather elsewhere. It is necessary to measure the fairway of the Moscow River, whether the Aurora will pass
      1. novel66 19 May 2020 22: 41 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        buddy, you're an aviator !! X-22 is still there and they are more effective than 152 mm shells
        1. Aviator_ 19 May 2020 23: 05 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          When in his youth he studied history, he could not have imagined that the slogan of the summer of 1917, “Down with the capitalist ministers,” would again become relevant. Only the party is no longer that it was 100 years ago.
          1. novel66 19 May 2020 23: 07 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            and with parties in general a problem .. according to party lists for whom to vote? I do not see...
            1. Aviator_ 19 May 2020 23: 11 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Also without a clue. Most likely I won’t go anywhere.
              1. novel66 19 May 2020 23: 14 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                for us, they will vote ....
    4. Piramidon 20 May 2020 11: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: novel xnumx
      and into battle ... on Winter ...

      Winter now to do with it? If in such a battle, then you have to relocate it to the Moscow River laughing
  2. Wizard_57 19 May 2020 14: 48 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    But in the "Star" tanker collected ... All for sale!

    How was it collected? From Korean blocks. We have - laying, assembling, painting, testing and commissioning of the vessel. Well, and some other little things. Now we need to learn how to build on new technologies from scratch. Koreans at one time have learned and it’s good that we are taught. The Chinese are building ships of any class non-stop - there are capacities, people, and technology. So it is with us - the Star will be completed, including a huge dry dock, there will be technologies, there will be people who can build, then the normal construction of ships of the 1st rank will unfold. In the meantime, our destiny, or rather the ceiling - frigates, albeit large (22350M) in the future. Well, submarines, without which it is simply impossible.
    1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 14: 56 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Wizard_57
      normal construction of ships of the 1st rank

      "The plant will produce tankers for the transportation of hydrocarbons (oil, gas), as well as offshore drilling platforms. Currently, Rosneft is the main customer of the enterprise, acquiring a wide range of marine equipment to service its projects on the shelf." About the ships for the Navy, even no plans. That's what a shame!
      1. Wizard_57 19 May 2020 14: 59 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        About the ships for the Navy, even no plans. That's what a shame!

        I agree, but after all, the "Academician Chersky" wherever he just sailed from Nakhodka ... But he stands in Mukran, loads the pipes. It is very easy to change plans; it is not a plant to build.
        1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 15: 07 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Wizard_57
          Plans to change

          A. Chersky wagged like a Markitan boat, swept the tracks, let it load, finish the pipeline ...
          But at the shipyard, the bourgeoisie, they will not let the Navy build!
          1. Wizard_57 19 May 2020 15: 21 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            But at the shipyard, the bourgeoisie, they will not let the Navy build!

            As they said in Odessa - "We will live - we will see!". Of course, while all sorts of sanctions things, etc. - "We will build tankers and rigs!". And under the guise it is necessary to buy a machine park, while they give. Helicopter columns are already doing there. And so, something my inner voice tells me that if they press it, they will build ships there, and not just ships. And yes, by the way, the customer of the dock complex at the plant (which is 500 m) is the Navy ...
          2. Grits 20 May 2020 05: 31 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            But at the shipyard, the bourgeoisie, they will not let the Navy build!

            To shoot the bourgeois. Business then ...
            1. Uncle lee 20 May 2020 10: 23 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Gritsa
              To shoot the bourgeois.

              Alexander hi That's what the sailor Zheleznyak is for!
  3. seregatara1969 19 May 2020 16: 37 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    with strong electronic warfare, the aurora ischo will pour gunpowder under the tail of the enemy!
  • Svarog51 19 May 2020 20: 16 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Roma hi The duties of the Sentinel from the UGiKS are slightly differently prescribed.
    “The sentry is obliged: to vigilantly guard and steadfastly defend his post, to serve vigorously, not distracting anything, not letting go of the arms of the weapon and not passing it to anyone, including the persons to whom he is subordinate ..."
    I will not quote everything, but I still remember. About the shift, see below. I laid out the link to Gene Terenin about the sentry guarding the post for 9 years. These are the collisions that happen in life.
  • AVTOHTON 19 May 2020 16: 12 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    37 years in service! Veteran! hi And traditionally - 7 feet under the keel!

    They knew how to build, they will load it now with all sorts of things and on duty in the Caribbean !!! laughing
  • g1v2 19 May 2020 13: 29 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Well, it seems that the modernization of the Atlanteans was finally abandoned. HZ, maybe better. But so far neither the 20350m nor the leaders are ready to pawn, the old people will have to run for a long time without replacement and modernization. Years to 45-50.
    1. Doccor18 19 May 2020 13: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      If two 22350 were lowered a year, then of course it would be better ...
      And so, it was necessary to modernize. Soon so in the ocean and one squadron will not collect.
    2. demiurg 19 May 2020 18: 35 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      His peers and classmates, the Ticonderoges are running around. There is no replacement either.
      You can build a large Burke or 20350m. But the time has come to change the tactics and armament of the ships. Zumwalt was a dead end. Need new ideas.
      1. Crimean partisan 1974 20 May 2020 18: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        We need new ideas ....... we need icebreakers. and we have them. and still on the way ...... and they are icebreakers. and in Africa, business
    3. Grits 20 May 2020 05: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: g1v2
      Well, it seems that the modernization of the Atlanteans was finally abandoned. HZ, maybe better. But so far neither the 20350m nor the leaders are ready to pawn, the old people will have to run for a long time without replacement and modernization. Years to 45-50.

      The only question is whether the rockets still remained in the warehouses. Granites, Volcanoes, Basalts ...
  • Vasyan1971 19 May 2020 13: 43 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    The previous time the cruiser was on a long hike from September 2015 to January 2016.

    That is, 4 months on the hike, after - 4 years on the repair. Did I understand correctly? Or did he still serve later? Correct, please. hi
    1. Doccor18 19 May 2020 14: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In rem. The flagship dock has been located since 2018. In June 2019, he went to sea for complex testing of mechanisms, but not for long.
      1. Vasyan1971 19 May 2020 14: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yeah. Thank.
  • vkd.dvk 19 May 2020 14: 52 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: novel xnumx
    but there’s no shift

    But in the "Star" tanker collected ... All for sale!
    PS Sailors from the Aurora are interested in when there will be a modernization ....
    If something is powerless sarcasm from despair.

    Dont be upset. Everything in the world has two sides. Not just bad.
    A tanker, during operation, makes a profit to the budget. And with the money earned, you can still do something useful for the state and people. The warship does not return a penny. Provided, of course, if it was made for themselves, and not for export. We need not only the military, and not only for ourselves. We need both civilians and the military for ourselves and the military for export. Penguins need to compete with their liquefied gas. Otherwise, they will capture this market completely, and we will not be able to see us there even under a microscope. You see what difficulties we have with laying pipes. It will only get worse.
    1. Uncle lee 19 May 2020 15: 13 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Quote: vkd.dvk
      profit to the budget

      If this were so, I would be glad, and so it is unknown to anyone ...
      A simple example: LNG plant on Sakhalin, 10 million tons per year and about 5 oil for export. And - 50% of the shares of Rosneft, and the rest are "partners"!
      How much the budget gets, the question is very interesting.
    2. Gary zucker 19 May 2020 17: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Why, the United States has the best sold ships. They go all over the world, they suck in dollars. And who does not want to take, so fiery greetings.
  • Break through 19 May 2020 14: 56 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Waiting for course tongue
  • vkd.dvk 19 May 2020 15: 00 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Quote: novel xnumx
    Aurora is easier - to put new guns, load coal - and into battle ... on the Winter ...

    Marshall cap broke his head? I thought of it.
  • Charik 19 May 2020 15: 17 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    it just became known when the repair -PROMISE-finish, and this anonymity is already in operation fool
  • Doccor18 19 May 2020 15: 38 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: vkd.dvk
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: novel xnumx
    but there’s no shift

    But in the "Star" tanker collected ... All for sale!
    PS Sailors from the Aurora are interested in when there will be a modernization ....
    If something is powerless sarcasm from despair.

    Dont be upset. Everything in the world has two sides. Not just bad.
    A tanker, during operation, makes a profit to the budget. And with the money earned, you can still do something useful for the state and people. The warship does not return a penny. Provided, of course, if it was made for themselves, and not for export. We need not only the military, and not only for ourselves. We need both civilians and the military for ourselves and the military for export. Penguins need to compete with their liquefied gas. Otherwise, they will capture this market completely, and we will not be able to see us there even under a microscope. You see what difficulties we have with laying pipes. It will only get worse.

    This is how to say ... And the destroyer, with its proper "use" can bring money to the budget no less than a tanker.
    "The welfare of the people and the state that this people inhabits is directly dependent on how much this people controls world trade. World trade is sea trade - the delivery of large goods in significant quantities over long distances is unprofitable other than by water, but with of other continents is simply impossible, due to the presence of a merchant fleet delivering goods and access (from the sea, of course) to the source of these goods. This access can be “arranged” in the form of a colony, or otherwise significant trade rights in the exchange of goods with independent states, and it doesn’t matter how they are established - either through agreements or through an “explicit order” (we look at how the Netherlands controlled the supply of goods from the Baltic to central and Western Europe). control of maritime trade, the state must possess a powerful navy so large and strong that it would not allow any other country to encroach on the state-owned “piece” of world trade. " Mahen.
  • next322 19 May 2020 15: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As previously reported, the cruiser’s full technical readiness will be restored by July of this year, after which Moscow will pass the required tests at the end of the summer ......

    l Another promise ..... God forbid, by the end of the year, at least restore marching readiness
  • Lord of the Sith 19 May 2020 16: 15 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I saw a cruiser in Sevastopol - power! 7 feet under the keel!
  • vkd.dvk 19 May 2020 18: 11 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: vkd.dvk
    profit to the budget

    If this were so, I would be glad, and so it is unknown to anyone ...
    A simple example: LNG plant on Sakhalin, 10 million tons per year and about 5 oil for export. And - 50% of the shares of Rosneft, and the rest are "partners"!
    How much the budget gets, the question is very interesting.

    They themselves answered their own question. fifty%. You are not accurate. "Partners" - who is this? If it’s ours, and the order is such that a Russian company should have a decisive stake, and this is 50% plus one decisive share, then decisions are made taking into account the interests of partners, but with the majority of shares. It may be that Russia has 50% of the shares, then the “partners” cannot block our decision. Specify. In addition to Rosneft, there may be other firms. Russian.
    1. Uncle lee 20 May 2020 01: 56 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The company's shareholders are Gazprom PJSC (50% + 1 share), Royal Dutch Shell Shell PS (27,5% - 1 share), Mitsui & Co. Ltd. " (12,5%) and Mitsubishi Corporation (10%).
      This is an extract from the registry.
  • vkd.dvk 19 May 2020 18: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Doccor18
    Quote: vkd.dvk
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: novel xnumx
    but there’s no shift

    But in the "Star" tanker collected ... All for sale!
    PS Sailors from the Aurora are interested in when there will be a modernization ....
    If something is powerless sarcasm from despair.

    Dont be upset. Everything in the world has two sides. Not just bad.
    A tanker, during operation, makes a profit to the budget. And with the money earned, you can still do something useful for the state and people. The warship does not return a penny. Provided, of course, if it was made for themselves, and not for export. We need not only the military, and not only for ourselves. We need both civilians and the military for ourselves and the military for export. Penguins need to compete with their liquefied gas. Otherwise, they will capture this market completely, and we will not be able to see us there even under a microscope. You see what difficulties we have with laying pipes. It will only get worse.

    This is how to say ... And the destroyer, with its proper "use" can bring money to the budget no less than a tanker.
    "The welfare of the people and the state that this people inhabits is directly dependent on how much this people controls world trade. World trade is sea trade - the delivery of large goods in significant quantities over long distances is unprofitable other than by water, but with of other continents is simply impossible, due to the presence of a merchant fleet delivering goods and access (from the sea, of course) to the source of these goods. This access can be “arranged” in the form of a colony, or otherwise significant trade rights in the exchange of goods with independent states, and it doesn’t matter how they are established - either through agreements or through an “explicit order” (we look at how the Netherlands controlled the supply of goods from the Baltic to central and Western Europe). control of maritime trade, the state must possess a powerful navy so large and strong that it would not allow any other country to encroach on the state-owned “piece” of world trade. " Mahen.

    You still agree to privateers. Destroyer, profitable in the country's budget. Surround yourself.
  • Petrol cutter 19 May 2020 19: 11 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The steamer is valid, to be sure. Give him a mind, will still walk and walk.
    But for example, PD Hero, I would pay close attention. In fact.
    I didn’t lie, I didn’t happen to them (at the seredyn) as they say in Ukraine, but I looked at them outside for two years.
    Honestly, it does not inspire ... If it is in Murmansk! ... Where, in theory, something!
    This principle had no right to happen! What to say here ...
  • lvov_aleksey 19 May 2020 22: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    on stupidity, I have no comments ...
  • Kestrel 20 May 2020 19: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The ships of rank 1 and 2 in the Russian Federation are not very dense right now, which means that we must carefully treat everyone who remains and maintain them in service, at least until the construction of new, equivalent ones!