Military Review

Trumps from the Ministry of Justice: Russia appealed the court decision on billions of Yukos

35

The press service of the Russian Ministry of Justice announces an appeal against the decision of the ASN (Court of Appeal in The Hague (Netherlands)) in the Yukos case. Recall that we are talking about the decision of this court, which ordered the Russian state to pay shareholders $ 50 billion "plus $ 7 billion of accumulated interest."


It is reported that today, May 15, the Russian Federation sent a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In the complaint, Russia is demanding the cancellation of the decision of the Court of Appeal in the lawsuit by the Yukos majority.

Russia notes that the ASN actually ignored the facts of the plaintiffs violating anti-corruption standards, as well as “anti-laundering” international laws. In addition, Russia notes the proven fact of collusion and fictitious tendering of officials with former shareholders of the oil company. A statement was added on the facts of bribing officials who were responsible for the privatization of Yukos.
Of Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation:

Offshore "dummy companies" controlled by Russian citizens did not actually pay for YUKOS shares and, accordingly, did not make any contribution to the Russian economy. Under the management of Yukos, the former owners allowed tax evasion, illegal withdrawal of assets abroad, money laundering and other illegal actions.
In a cassation appeal, he indicates that at one time, representatives of oligarchic circles bribed the main witness in this high-profile case.

It is added that the Dutch arbitration judges were misled:

The plaintiffs were actually Russian oligarchs - beneficiaries of NK Yukos. The court presented irrefutable evidence of the relationship of Russian citizens with the plaintiffs. Therefore, plaintiffs cannot be recognized by foreign investors.

Recall that after the decision by the Court of Appeal in The Hague to pay $ 50 billion to the "shareholders", many experts were quick to declare that Russia "now will not be able to get away from having to pay." However, these experts clearly ran ahead. Litigation will continue. At the same time, the Ministry of Justice has important trump cards. One of them is the facts of violation of the law on money laundering by those who call themselves "foreign investors". And today this trump card has entered the big game with billions in bets.
Photos used:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/Sergey Orekhov
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. for
    for 15 May 2020 13: 19 New
    +6
    Offshore "dummy companies" controlled by Russian citizens did not actually pay for YUKOS shares and, accordingly, did not make any contribution to the Russian economy. Under the management of Yukos, the former owners allowed tax evasion, illegal withdrawal of assets abroad, money laundering and other illegal actions.

    This can be presented to any company.
    1. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 15 May 2020 14: 04 New
      13
      This must be presented to the Russian oligarchs - the plunderers of national wealth.
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 15 May 2020 14: 12 New
        +2
        But who will plant him? He is a monument
        (CE).
        Will they present themselves?
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 15 May 2020 15: 50 New
        +3
        Quote: Ilya-spb
        This must be presented to the Russian oligarchs - the plunderers of national wealth.

        1. seregatara1969
          seregatara1969 15 May 2020 16: 11 New
          +5
          These faces do not even know where Syzran and its oil refineries are. The Syzran refinery during the WWII processed one million tons of oil into gasoline for the front. Heavy oil.
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 15 May 2020 19: 43 New
            +2
            Quote: seregatara1969
            These faces do not even know where Syzran and its oil refineries are.

            But they know how to "cut the loot".
        2. Ilya-spb
          Ilya-spb 15 May 2020 18: 42 New
          0
          Something is not enough on your list of people ...
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 15 May 2020 19: 44 New
            +1
            Quote: Ilya-spb
            Something is not enough on your list of people ..

            I’ll add.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. svp67
    svp67 15 May 2020 13: 23 New
    11
    At the same time, the Ministry of Justice has important trump cards.
    What kind of "trump cards" are we talking about, when the "West" plays "its own", and even with a "marked" deck
    1. Glory1974
      Glory1974 15 May 2020 13: 38 New
      +7
      What "trump cards" are we talking about,

      Probably we are talking about those who allowed illegally privatizing the public domain at secured auctions. They are still at the trough, they know who brought to whom and how much, they know where there is documentary evidence.
      Perhaps the time has come to reveal the truth in court. We know her from the trial between Berezovsky and Abramovich, where all the scams and frauds were revealed. Berezovsky lost there and, as unnecessary, was sent to the country of "eternal hunting".
      Here, the question is still open.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 15 May 2020 19: 48 New
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      What kind of "trump cards" are we talking about, when the "West" plays "its own", and even with a "marked" deck

      And maybe checkers. Only some who play giveaway. (But not "West").
  4. 7,62h54
    7,62h54 15 May 2020 13: 28 New
    +4
    Those. withdrawing money abroad is a crime, or only in the case of the Yukos affair, when partners began to take by the throat?
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 15 May 2020 14: 13 New
      +7
      A crime when the wrong people withdraw money. Its possible.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 15 May 2020 15: 52 New
        +2
        Quote: Pereira
        A crime when the wrong people withdraw money. Its possible.

  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 15 May 2020 14: 13 New
      +2
      For some reason, I believe in this more than the professionalism of our lawyers.
    2. Nastia makarova
      Nastia makarova 15 May 2020 14: 40 New
      -1
      yes yes everything paid
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 15 May 2020 15: 55 New
        +2
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        yes yes everything paid

        1. Nastia makarova
          Nastia makarova 15 May 2020 15: 57 New
          -1
          thieves have always been from adam and eve
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 15 May 2020 19: 42 New
            0
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            thieves have always been from adam and eve

            That's for sure. The Sumerians stole an apple from Satan and tossed Eve.
  6. fa2998
    fa2998 15 May 2020 14: 00 New
    +2
    Quote: for
    Offshore "dummy companies" controlled by Russian citizens did not actually pay for YUKOS shares and, accordingly, did not make any contribution to the Russian economy. Under the management of Yukos, the former owners allowed tax evasion, illegal withdrawal of assets abroad, money laundering and other illegal actions.

    This can be presented to any company.

    Right! When they were privatized "by pull", they gave bribes to officials, there were "respected people". As they became inconvenient, they took the company. So the rest of the privatizers and this government are lyuby. Or they quietly sold the company, and over the hill. hi
  7. GRIGORIY76
    GRIGORIY76 15 May 2020 14: 10 New
    +5
    YUKOS was "privatized" incorrectly and illegally, and the rest of the Soviet wealth was honestly divided? Someone there decided to step on thin ice?
  8. Old Operator
    Old Operator 15 May 2020 14: 20 New
    +4
    The very existence of Yukos, resulting from criminal privatization, should be reviewed
    1. ender
      ender 15 May 2020 14: 31 New
      +5
      why only Yukos?
    2. for
      for 15 May 2020 14: 33 New
      +4
      Quote: Old Operator
      The very existence of Yukos, resulting from criminal privatization, should be reviewed

      Like other enterprises. "Especially" People's Property " Gazprom and Rosneft.
  9. signifera
    signifera 15 May 2020 14: 35 New
    +3
    Stop, bargain and pay. Everyone gets paid in the end. There just probably still isn’t a beautiful formulation and reason to properly present it to us. Again, they will arrange a type of heroic defense in court, they say they did everything they could ...
    1. Nastia makarova
      Nastia makarova 15 May 2020 14: 41 New
      -1
      do not pay because 50 lard no
      1. signifera
        signifera 15 May 2020 16: 36 New
        -3
        They will find a way. They will take a loan, for which year I have not been surprised at ingenious decisions and multi-steps. Again gasoline at 70r, VAT 35%, retirement age 75, there is still digging and digging)))
        And after the triumphant speeches about the pass, about the debt to Ukraine ... and then like, well, you have to pay, you what, how could it be otherwise. The trend is sad. They will not be paid in court, their assets will be seized or sanctions will be imposed, which will lower our standard of living, as usual.
        1. Nastia makarova
          Nastia makarova 16 May 2020 06: 38 New
          -1
          but is there where to lower our level ??
  10. Avior
    Avior 15 May 2020 14: 38 New
    +2
    I suspect that these arguments will not matter.
    The case has been examined for many years, the arguments that have been set out long ago or should have been stated.
    The key point was the interpretation of certain provisions, in particular, whether international agreements were considered valid in Russia from the moment they were signed or from the moment they entered into force, it was about article 45 of the energy charter agreement.
    Russia then managed to prove that the treaties were not valid until the entry into force of the agreement.
    But later, the Constitutional Court decided in the case of the annexation of Crimea that the treaties are valid from the moment of signing.
    .

    The Treaty on the Adoption of Crimea was signed on March 18, 2014 and was applied temporarily until its ratification, which took place a few days later. The Constitutional Court, urgently considering the request of President Vladimir Putin to verify the constitutionality of this agreement, wrote on March 19 that "in fact, the adoption of the Republic of Crimea as part of the Russian Federation is provided as an element of the application of the treaty in question before its ratification." This meant that Crimea and Sevastopol were part of the Russian Federation from the moment of signing the agreement, and not from the moment it entered into force, the Constitutional Court explained.

    Yukos shareholders took advantage of this and appealed the old decision

    And how these new arguments can work if the key problem in the question was in a completely different way is not clear.
    This is, after all, an appeal, and not an examination of the case on the merits, they will obviously be asked there for new arguments - have you not known this for many years?
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rbc.ru/rbcnews/economics/27/02/2020/5e5679149a79472bb69d6602
  11. Gennady Korsunov
    Gennady Korsunov 15 May 2020 14: 57 New
    +8
    And who will tell you! After the collapse of the USSR did we (Russia) even win something somewhere?
    1. signifera
      signifera 15 May 2020 16: 39 New
      +1
      Like champions on writing off debts and loans to foreign states. Can be considered a win in such a race.
  12. Hypatius
    Hypatius 15 May 2020 16: 54 New
    +5
    The situation is simple: 1. Former Komsomol members stole an asset from the people. 2. Former Chekists squeezed out an asset stolen from the people from Komsomol members. 3. Komsomol members wanted money for an asset stolen from the people and squeezed out of lawlessness by the KGB. 4. They want money from the people, well, not the Chekists?
    They’ll get money, because people can’t get used to it without salt .. eat.
    Hopefully, from the NWF, Trillionchik Sberu was thrown into poverty. And other ghouls in line. Well, the Icelanders fellows, were able to organize a referendum that the debts of Alegarchs and bankers are the debts of banks, not the people or the state. Is it weak for us?
    Bankrupt this Rosneft, and create Gosneft with 146 million shareholders. This is true.
  13. ltc35
    ltc35 16 May 2020 07: 51 New
    +1
    The longer I live, the more I understand that Khodor and his YUKOS are just a child compared to their current "friends". Nano, skolkovo, eastern, and now Sechin is a geneticist ...
  14. notingem
    notingem 16 May 2020 09: 43 New
    0
    In the Netherlands, this appeal will not even be read. And they will uphold
  15. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 17 May 2020 11: 54 New
    0
    Well, if from us there will be the same lawyers who defended the interests of Gazprom in Stockholm - write, it’s gone.