China considers sanctions against US officials

77
China considers sanctions against US officials

Official Beijing is extremely dissatisfied with United States allegations of China's involvement in the spread of coronavirus infection and does not rule out retaliation, including anti-American sanctions. It is reported by the Global Times with reference to sources.

China has extremely negatively adopted the new US bill on liability for COVID-19, which proposes to introduce anti-Chinese sanctions in response to the spread of coronavirus, if Beijing does not provide a full report on where, when and for what reasons the disease occurred. The corresponding document was submitted to the US Senate by Lindsay Graham, eight more representatives of the US Republican Party voted for it. In response, China strongly protested.



China will respond not only symbolically, it will take countermeasures that will be painful for them

- stated in China, adding that at least four congressmen and two organizations will be on the sanctions list. Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who filed a lawsuit against China because of the spread of coronavirus, will not ignore Beijing in Beijing.

As previously reported, the new US bill requires China to provide a full report on the causes of the coronavirus pandemic within two months and provide evidence of its innocence in the emergence and spread of COVID-19. US President Donald Trump said that so far this bill has not been seen, but promised to "carefully study it."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry called the bill proposed by Graham immoral and "completely ignoring the facts."


    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    77 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      14 May 2020 11: 58
      It's high time ... and our helmsmen would also do well to impose sanctions on Texas itself.
      1. +13
        14 May 2020 12: 05
        Quote: NEXUS
        It's high time ... and our helmsmen would also do well to impose sanctions on Texas itself.

        It would be nice .. Only "... what will we threaten from here ..."? There is nothing special
        1. +11
          14 May 2020 12: 36
          What is the time, that's for sure. But here we, unlike China, have not yet gained enough strength. We urgently need to transfer the entire Internet to Russian jurisdiction following the example of China, introduce a crypto ruble for international payments attached to gold, prohibit the export of gold from Russia - we must buy all the gold mined ourselves, introduce a crypto ruble to pay for government contracts inside Russia with a credit rate 1-1.5%, introduce control over currency speculation on the stock exchange - tax on currency speculation.
          These measures will at least somehow protect us from sharks from Washington.
          1. 0
            14 May 2020 19: 11
            Quote: The Truth
            urgently transfer the entire Internet to Russian jurisdiction following the example of China, introduce a crypto ruble for international payments, attached to gold,

            With good intentions you yourself know where the path leads.
            An independent Internet is a great temptation for the authorities to pursue a tough information policy. It is now the authorities who do not want to lower the "iron curtain". and tomorrow everything can change. And then you will leave comments on the sites after showing your passport and party card.
            And about the crypto-ruble, tell me how the crypto currency (which by default is anonymous and not tied to the Central Bank) corresponds to the national interests of any country? So far, it is mainly used by international drug dealers and other dashing people. Well, remooters dough in offshore.
            1. +2
              15 May 2020 16: 00
              And what's wrong with authorization? When you write an application for employment, a loan, an application to the court, register in a hotel, etc., you do not refer to the fact that you do not have a passport. A similar requirement should be on the Internet. Then they will surely immediately find freaks who hung on the wall with our warring relatives a portrait of Hitler and Goebels: hung, and you were immediately hanged. A fun time will come. Everyone should be responsible for what they do. If you do not want to answer, then you are hiding. This is understandable. That is why criminals are often sitting on the cries of the filthy, as Comrade Zhiglov said.
              About the crypto ruble. To date, no state has had the need to introduce a state cryptocurrency. Therefore, speculators and parasites, correctly, drug dealers and other dashing people, were sitting on the cryptocurrency. But now this need has formed. The first to introduce cryptocurrency is China. The crypto-yuan issued by the Central Bank of China already exists, but has not yet received wide distribution. According to, do not worry, crypto-yuan will soon be the same means of payment as the yuan itself. The reason China is forced to switch to crypto-yuan is the economic war unleashed by the Anglo-Saxons and the possible US denial of debt to China. At the same time, I draw attention to the main purpose of the crypto-yuan - to untie the yuan from the dollar. As soon as this process gains sufficient strength, the pace of development of China will not be double-digit, but three-digit. In the USSR, this situation was in the 30s, when the ruble was secured by gold and was not tied to the currency of other states. Then the USSR developed at a 2-digit pace. Russia can repeat this only when it untie the ruble from the dollar. One way is the introduction of the crypto ruble and the gold ruble. Crypto-ruble is necessary for the full transfer of all government spending to treasury non-cash execution of state obligations and control through an electronic payment system. You can’t pinch the bribe from the crypto ruble - the crypto ruble cannot be converted into cash. A similar settlement system existed in the USSR, where there was a ruble for non-cash payments and a ruble for monetary circulation of citizens. There were drawbacks, but the main function of the non-cash ruble was performed primarily by lending to industry. The credit rate for non-cash payments was at the level of 1%.
              I apologize for such a long answer, but it hurts a living question for Russia.
          2. +1
            14 May 2020 19: 25
            No measures will protect the Russian Federation from the sharks of Washington, except for the victorious imperialist war laughing Of course, if we do not return to socialism, then Washington has no chance drinks
            1. 0
              15 May 2020 15: 08
              Quote: Doliva63
              Of course, if we do not return to socialism, then Washington has no chance

              What is it that the USSR did not crush the USA with socialism?
              1. 0
                15 May 2020 19: 08
                Quote: CSKA
                Quote: Doliva63
                Of course, if we do not return to socialism, then Washington has no chance

                What is it that the USSR did not crush the USA with socialism?

                But the USSR did not have such a task. Unlike the USA, by the way.
                1. +1
                  18 May 2020 12: 49
                  Quote: Doliva63
                  But the USSR did not have such a task. Unlike the USA, by the way.

                  )))) And what was the Soviet Union’s task in the Cold War? And why did it fall apart under socialism?
                  1. 0
                    18 May 2020 18: 05
                    Quote: CSKA
                    Quote: Doliva63
                    But the USSR did not have such a task. Unlike the USA, by the way.

                    )))) And what was the Soviet Union’s task in the Cold War? And why did it fall apart under socialism?

                    From the moment of its creation, the USSR had one task - to withstand the aggression of external / internal enemies and to develop further. As for its "collapse", there was no longer socialism at that moment.
                    1. +1
                      20 May 2020 10: 09
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      Since its inception, the USSR has had one task - to withstand the aggression of external / internal enemies

                      And for some reason it didn’t work out.
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      and develop further

                      For some time it turned out, but in general the result is known.
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      As for its "collapse", there was no longer socialism at that moment.

                      No, he was just there. In general, nothing has changed except for the emergence of cooperatives, but they did not destroy the USSR. The structure of the economy remained the same.
                      1. 0
                        20 May 2020 20: 03
                        What cooperatives are you talking about? The social economy in the Union was destroyed in the mid-60s. The economic decline of the Union began in the mid-70s. And here's another joke - in the military schools of the 80s, textbooks on the economics of socialism were secret. I remember because I was a secretary in the group. It's strange, considering that everything was chewed by the classics long ago, isn't it? laughing When our economy worked normally, our Victories and Volga were bought and copied in the West, as everything began to crumble, we bought in the West an outdated wretched Fiat. This is me for clarity, so to speak drinks
                        1. 0
                          21 May 2020 13: 48
                          Quote: Doliva63
                          The social economy in the Union was destroyed in the mid-60s

                          Yes? And by whom? Kosygin?)))) And how was it destroyed? What actions? That is, it turns out that before Brezhnev there was a social economy. Great. The only strange thing is that it was under Brezhnev that people really began to live not very badly, despite the shortage. And under Khrushchev, their social economics lived so beautifully that people in Novocherkassk took to the streets, for which they were shot.
                          And what is social economics in general? Socialism based on the complete control of the state over the economy (planned economy, command and administrative system).
                          He was absent? He was with all that under Stalin, that under Brezhnev.
                          The system built in the USSR had nothing to do with the Marxist understanding of socialism, since under it there was neither the self-government of the working people, nor the "withering away" of the state, nor public (and not state) ownership of the means of production; the alienation, which, according to Marx, must be overcome under socialism, has reached sizes exceeding capitalist societies.
                          The Soviet system did not go beyond the boundaries of capitalism as a mode of production, and in essence was state monopoly capitalism (most of the means of production belong to one monopoly owner - the state).
                        2. 0
                          22 May 2020 17: 31
                          You see, there was no time to really engage in the construction of civilized socialism - then the flawed shortcomings of tsarism will arrange a civil war, then our "partners" from the West will organize the Great Patriotic War for us, then every time we need to raise the whole country out of ruin. And then this idiot Khrushch got out - from him and the rotting of the economy began. And Brezhnev, he only tried to preserve what he inherited from Khrushch, he did not bring anything new and useful.
          3. 0
            15 May 2020 15: 07
            Quote: The Truth
            introduce a crypto ruble for international payments attached to gold, prohibit the export of gold from Russia

            If we attach the ruble to gold, even crypto, even ordinary, then we cannot ban the export of gold.
      2. +10
        14 May 2020 12: 05
        1. Last time, too, China shouted loudly, but eventually recognized everything and agreed to the terms of amykros under a trade agreement. How Chinese banks comply with anti-Russian sanctions.
        2. China, in fact, has its own well-being in the first place, and cheap show-offs, in the last.
        1. +1
          14 May 2020 12: 09
          Quote: Civil
          but all eventually recognized and agreed to the conditions of amykros

          Yes?
          Did I miss something?
          1. -3
            14 May 2020 12: 35
            Quote: Spade
            Quote: Civil
            but all eventually recognized and agreed to the conditions of amykros

            Yes?
            Did I miss something?

            Yes, missed:
            The US and China have reached a "Phase One" trade agreement that provides for a significant increase in Chinese imports of American agricultural products in exchange for Washington’s refusal to introduce new restrictive measures, reports the Reuters news agency.
            Chinese officials agreed to many structural changes and large-scale purchases of American agricultural products, manufactured goods, and much more
            https://rg.ru/2019/12/14/stali-izvestny-detali-torgovoj-sdelki-mezhdu-ssha-i-kitaem.html
        2. +3
          14 May 2020 12: 10
          China has nowhere to retreat. Behind Beijing. Then either pan or you will be devoured (gone).
          NEW YORK, May 7. / TASS /. The fate of the Soviet Union is destined for China in the event that it does not abandon its authoritarian regime in favor of Western policy. With such a warning on Thursday, US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo spoke in the author’s broadcast of Steve Gruber.

          https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/8421521
        3. +2
          14 May 2020 12: 19
          - provide evidence of their non-involvement in the emergence and distribution of COVID-19.
          And besides another "test tube", and blah-blah-blah, do the Yankees have evidence of the involvement of the PRC?
          China can "throw" the amount of US debt to China, at least.
          And this is a different level. Plus the prestige for the Yankes and others will want to "cut down".
          1. +5
            14 May 2020 16: 59
            to provide evidence of their innocence in the origin and distribution of COVID-19 [quote] [/ quote] China needs to state that the burden of proof lies with whoever is blaming. But the authors of the bill and those who signed it closely consider in their criminal court. Significantly. With great desire, the article can be invented non-acidic.
      3. +19
        14 May 2020 12: 13
        What kind of sanctions will we impose on the accursed imperialists? They hardly have real estate in the Russian Federation and children with families with our sickly and hammery passports. What are we going to beat, in what sore spots?
        1. +3
          14 May 2020 13: 18
          Quote: Crowe
          What kind of sanctions will we impose on the accursed imperialists? They hardly have real estate in the Russian Federation and children with families with our sickly and hammery passports. What are we going to beat, in what sore spots?

          Sad but fair .....
        2. +2
          14 May 2020 17: 01
          [quote] They hardly have real estate in the Russian Federation and children with families with our sickly and hammer passport. / quote] But they can unearth shares in large business. And lay a hand on these shares. And there are such amounts that such demarches will be no weaker than a crotch sickle.
          1. +2
            14 May 2020 19: 16
            Quote: abrakadabre
            But they can unearth shares in large business. And lay a hand on these lobes

            After that, all our projects and property located outside the territorial borders of the Russian Federation will be arrested. Including accounts in foreign currency and gold reserves. The prospect is very "promising" fool
            1. +2
              14 May 2020 19: 19
              The prospect is very "promising"
              So this is another question. It was announced above that they cannot be punched because they have nothing here.
      4. +6
        14 May 2020 12: 29
        The list does not apply effective (real) Russian anti-American sanctions? Or the main thing is crowing?
        1. +2
          14 May 2020 12: 44
          I do not say, but as an option, hypothetically - a ban on the purchase of new Boeing airliners, Airbus will only say thank you, squeezing their companies out of Sakhalin 1 and 2, a ban on the passage of American airlines over our territory.
          1. +4
            14 May 2020 12: 59
            Not "hypothetically" but "delerically". Who is the operator of the development and the holder of the license for the Sakhalin-1 project? Let me tell you a secret - Exxon Neftegas Limited, a subsidiary of ExxonMobil. How will you squeeze them out? Together with the project?
            In Sakhalin-2, Shell has 27,5% minus one share. But this is a British-Dutch company. Who are we going to squeeze out? Hindus with Japanese?
            1. +4
              14 May 2020 13: 19
              On the other two, do you agree? And take away your mentoring aplomb. Remind you how, after coming to power, VVP took Sakhalin projects "under the nail"? And where did they go? Gazprom squeezed 50% plus one share. We agreed. "Violations of environmental rules" and all that? Nobody says to take "cavalry swoop", "You can always split firewood."
              1. +2
                14 May 2020 14: 00
                Do you agree on the other two?
                And I disagree on the other two. According to Boeing, it was generally possible not only to stop buying airplanes. It was possible to close their scientific and technical center and design center in Moscow, to excommunicate Zhukovsky’s academy, prohibit the supply of titanium by VSMPO Avisma to Boeing, which is 25% of the consumption, stop Ural Boeing Manufacturing in Verkhnyaya Salda and leave the Boeing without titanium parts, stop it the work of the FEZ “Titanium Valley” and leave the Boeing without machining titanium parts. Question to you - why didn’t all this happen?
                As for the ban on flying - this is not even funny. Take an interest in what American carriers fly through the territory of Russia.
                And try to figure out a debit with a loan, that is, what these measures will cost for the Russian economy.
                I didn’t offend you in a tone, I hope? By the way, the minuses are not mine.
                1. +2
                  14 May 2020 14: 20
                  Royalties for flights over Siberia by foreign airlines amount to about $ 300 million a year and go to Aeroflot's ticket offices. Without this money, he is bankrupt. So such a "ban" is not even a sickle for personal belongings. This is not counting that he will receive a DSLR for flights abroad , after which he can safely engage exclusively in flights from Yakutsk to Magadan)
                  All sanctions provide for a mandatory response
                  1. +2
                    15 May 2020 04: 48
                    Bankrupt - Once again I “nod” to Ukraine, the country is even worse off (financially) than we are. However, this did not stop them from banning our airlines from using their airspace. If locked, then banned.
                2. +3
                  14 May 2020 15: 33
                  So, stop, as they say - I wrote only about OPPORTUNITIES, which is POSSIBLE, you began to indicate RISKS (well, some of them) - it is true that the management evaluates ALL RISKS from them before making a concrete decision, I did not talk about risk assessment. Yes, this is from the same opera, if the Americans impose sanctions against the foreign divisions of Rosatom, they may suffer and not sickly themselves. But do they have the possibility of introduction?
                  By the way, the minuses are not mine.
                  I like violet, hi exercise. hi
                  1. +1
                    14 May 2020 15: 46
                    I wrote only about OPPORTUNITIES
                    You know, Aristotle began to write them. After him, no one tried to define "opportunity". In the end, they came to the conclusion, like Hegel himself, that in every possibility there is a probable impossibility. And Baumgarten defined possibility as "that which contains no contradiction."
                    In our case, it seems to me that these two factors determine the situation.
            2. +3
              14 May 2020 13: 28
              Quote: Undecim
              How will you squeeze them out? Together with the project?

              Yes, you are absolutely right ... How to squeeze the Americans out of Russian projects? This has been tested for a long time in the last century - along with those with whose easy hands they (the Americans) ended up in Russian projects, as irreplaceable sponsors and partners. Squeeze out like a “teal” and cauterize.
              Did you really give the United States the right to own the planet Earth? I wonder how they deserve it. Or, perhaps, there was not a single regiment left in Russia that it should adapt to the American "quacks"?
              Some users are right in one thing: Russia is in no position to radically turn the wheel of history. Only dissatisfied with Washington’s policies in the world are not so few. In vain, supporters of banking speculation and the liberal market economy are forcing us to stand in a column under the white flag. In the end, even a weak frog beat the sour cream in butter. And Russia is far from amphibian. We have tougher strokes, and the speed of whipping is higher. priorities need to be changed.
              As for China. It is unlikely that without the support of Russia, he will dare to confront the United States alone - neither economically, nor in any situation of armed conflict. Here, the number of troops in a positive direction will not resolve the issue.
              We must seek allies around the world, be friends with them, help the enemies of our enemies, forget about the sanctions and pursue an adequate policy with respect to each individual country. These slops dumped onto Russia, shit should not be sprinkled with sand. That is why recently the voice of the Russian Foreign Ministry sounds like Zakharov’s excuses. By the way, something after his famous phrase, Mr. Lavrov stepped aside ... But this is not the time ...
              1. 0
                14 May 2020 15: 35
                As for China. It is unlikely that without the support of Russia, he will dare to confront the United States alone

                And with support is unlikely to be. But, bye. The USA is the main market for China, that’s it.
      5. +7
        14 May 2020 12: 57
        Quote: NEXUS
        It's high time ... and our helmsmen would also do well to impose sanctions on Texas itself.

        It’s certainly time, only which ones? to ban Biden from entering Kursk?
        1. +2
          14 May 2020 13: 38
          Quote: Sandor Clegane
          It’s certainly time, only which ones? to ban Biden from entering Kursk?

          Why are you so critical? There are a number of chemical elements, without the supply of which from Russia to the US energy and economy sectors could come “kirdyk” ... By the way, the most effective way is to remove American partners from the shareholders and owners of some Russian enterprises and industries.
          The Americans blindly believed that the world could not escape from the equivalent of world currency. But this is not true. What matters here is only the ability to take a hit and not share the fate of world leaders who boldly declared their intentions, but did not take care of the presence of powerful armed forces.
          By the way, somewhere the news passed that after a verbal skirmish, the Russian military patrol still forced the US military to turn back. So, slowly, without jerking and screeching, it's time to point to the door to uninvited or arrogant guests.
      6. +1
        14 May 2020 13: 23
        Against the IMF leadership for example.
    2. -2
      14 May 2020 11: 58
      Americans can only be punished with the ruble ...
      1. +4
        14 May 2020 12: 02
        Introduce the ruble instead of the dollar in the US? Well, you and the villain. Although it really is well that they are sorry for these imperialists. The ruble is so ruble. am
        1. 0
          14 May 2020 12: 06
          ruble - from the word hack ...
        2. +1
          14 May 2020 13: 20
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Although it really is well that they are sorry for these imperialists.

          What unprecedented cruelty! belay
      2. +6
        14 May 2020 12: 04
        Unfortunately, they ruble them on the drum ...
        But it seems that they’ll pinch their pocket
      3. +1
        14 May 2020 12: 37
        Quote: Thrall
        Americans can only be punished with the ruble ...


        But I agree, but for this we need to do so much at home. But it is possible.
        1. 0
          14 May 2020 19: 33
          Quote: Civil
          Quote: Thrall
          Americans can only be punished with the ruble ...


          But I agree, but for this we need to do so much at home. But it is possible.

          For example?
    3. +3
      14 May 2020 11: 59
      And most importantly, no concerns. good Clear and tough.
    4. +4
      14 May 2020 12: 05
      Lindsay Graham's head and eight other Republican representatives will be delivered to Beijing at the fifteenth minute of China's opening of the US Treasures.
      P.S. Eric Schmitt is the same.
      1. +4
        14 May 2020 12: 38
        Americans recognize annulled Chinese paper and all. Actually they want to do this now. To recover a couple of trillion dollars from China as the main culprit of the pandemic, and since China does not give back, then simply cancel the securities and debt obligations.
        1. +1
          14 May 2020 13: 23
          Quote: donavi49
          Americans recognize annulled Chinese paper and all. Actually they want to do this now. To recover a couple of trillion dollars from China as the main culprit of the pandemic, and since China does not give back, then simply cancel the securities and debt obligations.

          If the Chinese follow, it will be a "world economic war." The world economy will really collapse and who will lose more of the question.
        2. +1
          15 May 2020 10: 51
          Quote: donavi49
          Americans recognize annulled Chinese paper and all.
          ?!
          Quote: donavi49
          Actually they want to do this now. To recover from China a couple of trillion dollars as the main culprit of the pandemic, and since China will not give up, then just annul securities and debt obligations.
          the USA will not dare, to such insolence - a world scandal !! Especially when you consider that a pair of large holders can immediately drop the mass volume of treasuries under it in conspiracy (let's say Russia, the United Arab Emirates and France), and to reset and they will be no longer possible !!!
          1. 0
            15 May 2020 11: 22
            Russia is not such a big holder, and here it can be brought under sanctions.
            UAE - will not argue with the owner, otherwise they will become guilty in September 11, the genocide in Yemen, and in general, they will block their oxygen. For what? They will just be silent in a rag.
            France - oh I doubt that someone from the EU would dare even bring such a discussion.

            Zeroing Chinese papers is a topic Trump, Pompeo, and senators are talking about.
            Trump yesterday generally spoke of breaking the relationship until all damage was repaired.
            Pompeo scares China with collapse if it does not follow the western path.
            “Pompeo predicted the fate of the USSR for China because of the rejection of the pro-Western policy.
            This authoritarian regime different from us. (...) The Chinese Communist Party will have to decide whether they really want to become part of a civilized community of nations (...) or they will do the same. We all know the history of the Soviet Union"
      2. +4
        14 May 2020 12: 50
        Quote: 17085
        Lindsay Graham's head and eight other Republican representatives will be delivered to Beijing at the fifteenth minute of China's opening of the US Treasures.

        Nope. Rather, the Darwin Prize will be delivered to Beijing. There are no problems with the placement of new treasuries at all. And what will China sell for 100-200 yards that he bought for 300. Whom will he punish with this? Well, which morgan chase will earn a hundred or two yards, out of the blue. Beijing also say thanks.
        True ... The flip side of these cloaks is that it is difficult to reset them. They will sell, at a small discount, to the same city groups or fargo and ... They will take apart the nullifiers for parts, if they don’t change their minds ..
        PS
        China holds about 5% of the total volume of treasuries. How to influence the market as a whole? Oh well.
        1. -2
          14 May 2020 13: 50
          Quote: Lannan Shi
          China holds about 5% of the total volume of treasuries. How to influence the market as a whole? Oh well.

          Mademoiselle! Your 5% is on one key, and China is the largest (along with Japan and the Fed) holder of US debt - 16,8% as of June 2019 (available data):

          A set of words (distorted by street jargon) from a textbook is not about owning a situation. And data corruption is a dubious argument.
          1. -1
            14 May 2020 14: 17
            Quote: ROSS 42
            and China is the largest (along with Japan and the Fed) holder of US debt - 16,8% in June 2019

            Melancholy. If 1.1 trillion is 16.8% of the debt, then the entire debt is 6,55 trillion. The task for the 5th or 6th grade.
            China does not hold 16% of everything, but only from external debt. And external debt is less than a third of the US government debt. The largest lenders of the United States - FRS and SST. One sst holds 3 trillion treasuries. This is more than Japan, China and England combined - the three largest external borrowers. And the total domestic debt of the United States, i.e. debt to US government institutions - 6 trillion. Almost parity with external. And yes. Domestic debt is part of the US government debt, and not something in itself.
            Quote: ROSS 42
            A set of words (distorted by street jargon) from a textbook is not about owning a situation. And data corruption is a dubious argument.

            Agree. Just explain one thing. Why sign this saying under distorted data?
            PS
            By the way. US dependence on external creditors is gradually decreasing. if 10 years ago the external debt was in the region of 40% of the total national debt, now it is less than 30. Contrary to agitation, the main creditor of the USA is the USA itself. And the situation goes from "basic" to "practically unique".
    5. -1
      14 May 2020 12: 20
      keep it up! ... wedge wedge wedge ...
    6. +8
      14 May 2020 12: 28
      In general, the penguins were overwhelmed. We were going to adopt the US LAW, OBLIGATING ANOTHER STATE TO PROVIDE A REPORT TO THEM.
      Are the congressmen seriously considering the decisions they make for the whole world to be binding? laughing
    7. -1
      14 May 2020 12: 33
      - said in China, adding that at least four congressmen and two organizations will be included in the sanctions list. Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who has filed a lawsuit against China over the spread of coronavirus, will not be ignored in Beijing

      About nothing at all.
      What is the prosecutor before the Chinese sanctions? Xiaomi will not buy itself something? Go with an iPhone.
      But what kind of sanctions will be against organizations and what kind of organization, this is interesting!
    8. +3
      14 May 2020 12: 43
      China considers sanctions against US officials


      They will kick in and everything, after the elections in the USA, will come to naught ...
    9. +2
      14 May 2020 12: 47
      The United States requires China to provide a full report on the causes of the coronavirus pandemic within two months and provide evidence of their non-involvement in the emergence and distribution of COVID-19.
      Where is the world going ???
      - You were there?
      - It was!
      - Beaten?
      - Do not beat!
      - So were or beaten?
      - I do not remember. I remember that when I was, I didn’t beat. And when he beat, he wasn’t!
    10. 0
      14 May 2020 12: 57
      at least four congressmen and two organizations will be included in the sanctions list ... Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt will not pass by their "attention" in Beijing
      With the possibilities of China, something is still a weak reaction. Probably waiting for the billions of dollars in lawsuits in the US courts to get a legal basis? But with such a collision, China could use the economic levers it has (import from the United States of agricultural products, export to the United States of metals, textiles, leather products, engineering products ...). Obviously, the loss of the American market is scary, although in this situation the United States will also suffer not frail losses. Let's see what will happen next.
    11. +2
      14 May 2020 13: 02
      The Chinese Foreign Ministry called the bill proposed by Graham immoral and "completely ignoring the facts."

      Finally, the thousand-year-old China is concerned about the immorality of the Anglo-Saxons. And in Russia, they are accustomed to the immoral behavior of the Anglo-Saxons. Only this habit is different for everyone. True patriots oppose her, and the "elite" brings her slippers.
    12. +1
      14 May 2020 13: 03
      Excellent wording to provide evidence of innocence. It was always believed that it was impossible to prove the absence
    13. +1
      14 May 2020 13: 04
      Quote: NEXUS
      It's high time ... and our helmsmen would also do well to impose sanctions on Texas itself.

      We are all bold, we don’t yet know all the ups and downs in the relationship between the ruling elite and the West. They don’t have such courage. They worry about denyuzhku. Not even an hour will freeze, and live on what? For a salary?
    14. -1
      14 May 2020 13: 13
      Yah?! Here it is, the world "democracy" in action, when the "assembly and production shop collective" announces sanctions to the plant director, chief engineer and their secretaries for misbehavior. Probably, the sanctions are not to use the bathroom in the workshop and not to enter there without the permission of the workshop party bureau?
    15. +1
      14 May 2020 13: 14
      in China, adding that at least four congressmen and two organizations will be on the sanctions list

      ... dashing trouble - the beginning))) so the Chinese comrades on their own "skin" are beginning to make sure that it is impossible to make a "Lama" out of gold .... all the more, a green piece of paper turns out to be gold .... and all the demagogy about communism with a Chinese person does not refute the Great Mao, but shows that apart from the world-American god called the dollar, you cannot separate yourself from the cultural and national specifics ... Sanctions are a class enemy, not an economy ... I am not a "wang ", but the PRC is waiting for either" humpbacked perestroika "or a slide towards National Socialism (Hitler has already shown in practice what National Socialism is) ... So think our Chinese comrades what you want ...
    16. +2
      14 May 2020 13: 20
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      China has nowhere to retreat. Behind Beijing. Then either pan or you will be devoured (gone).
      NEW YORK, May 7. / TASS /. The fate of the Soviet Union is destined for China in the event that it does not abandon its authoritarian regime in favor of Western policy. With such a warning on Thursday, US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo ...

      Strongly Pompeo spoke out, at the limit of sincerity. As soon as China began, so far verbally, to break away from arrogant banditry, it was immediately recorded in authoritarianism. About how, it turns out for a trade friendship with democracies, you have to pay. Someone here will have to bend a lot. I bet on China - it will rub off with maximum indignation and will continue to accumulate strengths until the next American collision.
    17. +1
      14 May 2020 13: 29
      Quote: Okolotochny
      I do not say, but as an option, hypothetically - a ban on the purchase of new Boeing airliners, Airbus will only say thanks

      The United States recently introduced 15% on civilian aircraft from the EU. In Europe, no one even blundered. This is me, by the way.
    18. +1
      14 May 2020 13: 44
      That's all well done, everyone is discussing, but in fact this is ordinary trading.
      We will scare, Those will scare, these will scare, and then "as always".

      For the past 3 years, China has been scaring the US with new sanctions, and the result is zilch.

      We, too, with the United States and Europe, and frightening, sanctions, and counter-sanctions, and "torture yourself to swallow dust", and a ban on having accounts of a heap of Western officials, and as a result - a bunch of Elita children in Yusa (on VO there was an article about export due to coronavirus) , Rusal in yusa, and the media regularly find something new, exported to the west, and western owners of a bunch of our brands ...

      Trump and K will not be allowed to keep the RMB account in China. So what??
    19. +3
      14 May 2020 13: 47
      China considers sanctions against US officials

      The Chinese put on a good face when they play badly. On the one hand, they are constantly sagging under the United States, on the other hand, they make "formidable" statements.
    20. -1
      14 May 2020 13: 56
      As previously reported, the new US bill requires China to provide a full report on the causes of the coronavirus pandemic within two months and provide evidence of its innocence in the emergence and spread of COVID-19.

      And are the US ready to provide a full report of its planetary "peacekeeping" activities since 1945? Or Colin Powell's in vitro assay?
    21. 0
      14 May 2020 14: 59
      It is not necessary to take retaliatory measures, but counter measures. Senators said - to list them. And only so.
      1. 0
        15 May 2020 10: 59
        Quote: Olegi1
        Senators said - to list them. And only so.
        yeah to the firing squad! At once !
        Quote: Olegi1
        And only so.
    22. +1
      14 May 2020 15: 15
      This is what a country that feels its strength can afford! I'm talking about China.
      Otherwise, our Foreign Ministry only knows how to express "concerns." Or, as an extreme option - "extreme concern!"
    23. -1
      14 May 2020 17: 37

      Is a senator who escaped from a psychiatric hospital able to offer something adequate ..
    24. -1
      14 May 2020 17: 55
      It’s high time to act in a mirror and invest in the development of independence .... globalization is a world order and we must end with it ..

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"