Belorussian Armed Forces MLRS “Polonaise” are capable of keeping NATO bases in Poland and the Baltic at gunpoint


The personnel of the Belarusian military parade of May 9, 2020 flew around many countries of the world. A special, so to speak, response to the military parade is caused in a number of NATO countries. Attention was drawn, in particular, to the Polonaise multiple launch rocket systems that had been in the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus for about 4 years.


NATO countries are concerned about the increasingly evolving characteristics of the Belarusian strike systems, namely, the range of target destruction. The maximum range for hitting targets for Polonaise missiles is 300 km. When these systems are placed along the western borders of the Republic of Belarus, parts of those NATO groups located in Poland and the Baltic States fall into the affected area. Under the spot are several bases of the North Atlantic military bloc.

For example, from Brest to Warsaw about 250 km, from the border regions of the Grodno region to the Lithuanian Šiauliai airfield, where the British air units with "Typhoons" are located, in a straight line - about 290 km. About 300 km from the same border territories of the Grodno region to the port infrastructure of the Lithuanian Klaipeda, where NATO shipping is often unloaded. The notorious Suvalki corridor is completely “shot through”, “more and more forces and means are being allocated to NATO” for “defense”.



Thus, the Belarusian army, even alone, possessing such powerful and long-range weapons as the 301-mm B-200 Polonaise, is capable of holding back large NATO forces from southeastern Poland with its several military bases to the territories of the Baltic Republics with more and more of them the growing concentration of the NATO military contingent.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parkello 12 May 2020 09: 46 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    the ardor clearly diminished. otherwise they still can’t digest Kaliningrad. and they won’t be able to.
    1. Insurgent 12 May 2020 09: 52 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: parkello
      Kaliningrad can not digest. And can not.

      Even the Germans, with their eternal "phantom pain" in relation to the former East Prussia, are not as restless as the Poles, to whom Kaliningrad is a hairpin pricking unbearably ...
      1. parkello 12 May 2020 10: 07 New
        • 25
        • 4
        +21
        the Germans had long forgotten about him .. they understand that they can’t see their ears in Kaliningrad. and the Poles have woken up, they didn’t have enough Belarusian and Ukrainian lands ... haven’t gotten drunk yet. I worked with them in Athens. with the Polish brigade. on the installation of iron structures. out of 10 Poles, 1 was normal. and even that is probably because he was too old, and in the USSR he often went to work in the Far North. they paid well there. that's just with him I talked after work. the rest ... as our Greeks say, take one and hit them the second .. very ambitious and daring ... well, there really is where it goes. where insolence does not channel as an argument, they prefer to drive on. one day they got drunk a lot, ran into shorter .. I did not stand on ceremony, I had an Albanian TT. I took it out and asked if anyone wants to check how I shoot, even when I'm drunk. they immediately remembered that we were allies, and so on ... what’s like? we are each other ... I’m not saying WE are each other. but I am now ... you’ve cleaned well in time. I would not want to take so much sin on my soul because of other people's rudeness. but they did not understand other words. fooling around. mol not in our say ... I like this type of understand. I’m happy to put the whole clip ... and you’ll quickly understand everything, not even on your own. two more Greeks, their kents climbed in, began to reassure, they say no, we are all at work ... to bury these freaks. hands itch. they were not given rest that I was from Georgia, but Greek citizenship. and I get like a Greek, for every extra hour of work .. you are jealous of such. I was lucky that I had a gun, which they did not know about. and so they would dig me ... and healthy ones you know, you’ll break a hell of it, just shoot request
        1. Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 53 New
          • 12
          • 25
          -13
          Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be held back. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply. There is a real group of suicide bombers which at its cost will allow the IOB to unfold. Although given that we are going on, we are not able to deploy even a million army. There are not so many trained reserves. I understand that we are old bisons with their radiculitis and heart attacks suffered even more like those who can pick up weapons. But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes
          1. Thrall 12 May 2020 11: 10 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Thus, the army of Belarus, even alone, possessing such powerful and long-range weapons as the 301-mm B-200 Polonaise

            At 300 km (almost) shoots B-300 Polonaise M
            1. Nikolaevich I 12 May 2020 11: 34 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              When the first reports about the upcoming production of Polonez MLRS with Chinese missiles in Belarus appeared “just”, it was mentioned in one article that the system should, after all, be bicalibrated ... by the 301 mm Eres add, subsequently, 370 mm ammunition ... also a "Chinese" caliber.
            2. knn54 12 May 2020 13: 46 New
              • 6
              • 5
              +1
              And the fact that the “Ax” (of which NATO has a lot) has a flight range of five times longer, the author is aware?
              1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 15: 47 New
                • 4
                • 1
                +3
                Quote: knn54
                And the fact that the “Ax” (of which NATO has a lot) has a flight range of five times longer, the author is aware?

                So what?
          2. Olgovich 12 May 2020 11: 21 New
            • 12
            • 2
            +10
            Quote: Nehist
            Although given that we are going on, we are not able to deploy even a million army. There are not so many trained reserves.

            Yeah. and they have it all.
            Quote: Nehist
            But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes


            And THEIR blue hamster generation of iPhone-directly, after all, the special forces eryo! lol

            do you even look WHO their generation works-at the factory as a worker, a peasant-hands in the field, etc. NONE. They, yes, will "fight" yes
          3. Hagen 12 May 2020 11: 37 New
            • 11
            • 0
            +11
            Quote: Nehist
            I understand that we are old bisons with their radiculitis and heart attacks suffered even more like those who can pick up weapons. But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes

            You are growing "current generation" and will say exactly what you are. The ancient Greeks covered their children with our words. Fathers and children are an old conflict. But the 6th company did not surrender, they will not surrender today. I'm sure.
          4. alone 12 May 2020 12: 38 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Nehist
            Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be restrained. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply.

            What war? What retention? If there is a war, it will be nuclear ... After such a war, if someone survives, it will be possible to hold only sticks and stones
          5. Marconi41 12 May 2020 22: 08 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Nehist
            Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be restrained. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply.

            Come on you. In case of conflict, the supply will be carried out by rail. True, the independence of some Baltic “tigers” will have to be sacrificed. So Kaliningrad will need to hold out no more than ten days.
          6. GTYCBJYTH2021 13 May 2020 18: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I agree with you .... I won’t be able to attack, but I still have the strength to cover the flanks ..... And years later, through .... only partisan .....
        2. seregatara1969 12 May 2020 12: 57 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Fuck you need karate, if there is TT! In the case of education, once in the knee to shoot fifty times better than educational conversation. This case is an example. The Greeks in the union were always full. But immediately bring up a whole group - they will come home and talk about the positive experience. I did it right.
        3. Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 14: 34 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          The Germans would rather remember the German Danzig and Slesien and Silesia, the Poles would not be in the way of diapers ...
          1. Sergej1972 12 May 2020 20: 27 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            At the moment, the Polish army is more combat-ready than the Bundeswehr.
    2. Bar1 12 May 2020 11: 37 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      this nata is already tired. Belarus and Russia should share the Baltic states and reduce the threat to the Russian peace.
      1. seregatara1969 12 May 2020 13: 00 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Cho to share it? There is a receipt on the purchase of the entire Baltic states together with the people from Sweden by Russia for one annual budget of Sweden. Let them redeem themselves according to the Eurozone, Ordnung is Ordnung.
        1. Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 14: 35 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          By the way, yes, let them pay and repent.
        2. Bar1 12 May 2020 19: 10 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: seregatara1969
          Let them redeem themselves according to the Eurozone, Ordnung is Ordnung.

          money is garbage, the main thing is security, while the Baltic states will be, there will be no peace for us.
  2. aszzz888 12 May 2020 09: 46 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    NATO countries are concerned about the increasingly evolving characteristics of the Belarusian strike systems, namely, the range of target destruction.
    So let them continue to “worry” at home, and remember where the Polonaise rackets can fly.
  3. Sailor 12 May 2020 09: 49 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Here I consider it fraternally !!!
  4. svp67 12 May 2020 09: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, that this "fiery product" of Sino-Belarusian cooperation is a rather "weighty argument" in any dispute ...
    1. novel66 12 May 2020 09: 56 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      yes Old Man somehow behaves ... maybe they will not be needed
      1. Most likely they will not be needed. This author took the TTX and dreamed that Belarus would declare war on NATO. A strange assumption ...
        1. novel66 12 May 2020 10: 38 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          no, well, you can dream
    2. KVU-NSVD 12 May 2020 10: 00 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: svp67
      quite a "weighty argument" in any dispute.

      And the priority goal with the negative development of this dispute. Especially when they are concentrated in the border areas (if used for situations and purposes described in the note. Again, their number is small. And the system with the transition class shells from the MLRS to the OTRK (for exact characteristics) is excellent
    3. Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 10: 08 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      Well, that this "fiery product" of Sino-Belarusian cooperation is a rather "weighty argument" in any dispute ...


      Belarusians actually localized the production of Chinese MLRS. Here and all the cooperation.

      According to well-known data, the Polonaise MLRS uses long-range high-precision 301-mm A200 type rockets developed and manufactured by the Chinese China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT, also known as the First Academy), part of the Chinese state aerospace corporation China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC). In the global market, the marketing of the A200 system is carried out by CASC's foreign trade association Aerospace Long-March International Trade Co., Ltd (ALIT), as well as the well-known Chinese corporation Poly Technologies. The joint development of the Polonaise MLRS based on A200 missiles was carried out in accordance with the Sino-Belarusian intergovernmental agreement concluded in 2013.

      Belarus, apparently, became the starting customer of the A200 missile system. The A200 missile with a caliber of 301 mm has a length of 7264 mm and a swing of stabilizers of 615 mm. The mass of the rocket is 750 kg. The warhead (three different types) is detachable, the combined guidance system is inertial with satellite correction (GPS). Firing range from 50 to "more than 200" km. The CV of the warhead at the maximum range in different sources is claimed to be from 30 to 50 m. A volley of eight missiles for eight different targets can be fired in 50 seconds, the preparation time for a volley is 8 minutes.
      The state tests of the MLRS Polonaise were completed in Belarus on May 30, 2016.


      In May 2017, the 8th International Exhibition of Arms and Military Equipment MILEX-2017 for the first time demonstrated an operational-tactical ballistic missile with an official range of up to 300 km, which should be introduced into the modified Polonaise system, which passed fire tests on October 26 .

      Judging by the prototype presented at MILEX-2017 with a distinctive appearance, this tactical missile is an M20 missile developed and manufactured by the same Chinese CALT. The M20 missile system has been advertised by CALT since 2011, with a declared maximum range of up to 280 km and a warhead weight of 480 kg. The M20 combined - inertial guidance system with satellite correction (GPS), the missile's CWO at a maximum range of 30 meters is announced. The missile flies along a "quasi-ballistic" trajectory.

      Another "300 km range missile" could also be the CALT-developed A300 missile.

      Since 2014, CALT has been touting a single universal missile system GATSS (General Army Tactical Strike System), using A100, A200, A300 and M20 missiles as well as CX-1 supersonic anti-ship missiles (the latter look like a clone of the Russian Onyx missile from one launcher) "/" Yakhont "). In fact, the modified Polonaise is apparently the GATTS complex.

      https://imp-navigator.livejournal.com/671627.html
      1. svp67 12 May 2020 10: 09 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Belarusians actually localized the production of Chinese MLRS

        And the "base chassis" also localized?
        1. donavi49 12 May 2020 10: 33 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          Yeah, the Chinese - their chassis based on Wanshan tractors, was created in close partnership with the MZKT.
          1. Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 57 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            It is quite logical. What for inventing no analogue. When can you safely combine a good Chinese missile with a good Belarusian chassis? !!
            1. Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 16 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              What for something to invent, it is better to be an agricultural laughing power cattle graze and plant radishes.
        2. Topol M 12 May 2020 11: 41 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Stump! You probably haven’t heard about the MZKT, the Strategic Missile Forces on Minsk tractors, you yourself drummed on Pioneer and Topol from 79 to 89. A missile is a missile, you won’t shoot it from a water pipe, the launch system is Belarusian. And the transfusion systems on modern tanks of the Russian Federation, do you happen to know who delivers?
  5. Hagen 12 May 2020 10: 04 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The maximum range for hitting targets for Polonaise missiles is 300 km.

    It is not clear where the catch is in this characteristic. Polonaise uses (according to open sources) the Chinese A-200 rocket. In its mass and overall parameters, it is close to 9M542. But more than 2 times superior in range. What is true here, what is the reason for such a run of characteristics? Other fuels, other rocket speeds or something else? In any case, at first glance there is reason for a wary perception of such news. Maybe one of the rocket specialists will shed light on the question. Are we behind China? Or how?
    1. donavi49 12 May 2020 10: 44 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Well, everything seems to be open there. The launch stage throws the rocket at 35-45km, and then it goes on the march quasi-ballistic with corrections and maneuvers.


      In general, the system is quite in demand, and the Chinese are not bad at trying to enter the markets through Belarusians. Aliyev has already bought.


      There, among the M20 offers, there is the Chinese version of the Iskander 480kg by 280km in the export offer, Belarusians are already friends of the rocket with the chassis.


      chinese version
      1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 05 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: donavi49
        Belarusians are already friends with the rocket chassis.

        There seems to be nothing to be “friends” with.
        As far as I read, you need to pair the rocket with the control system.
      2. alone 12 May 2020 12: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: donavi49
        In general, the system is quite in demand, and the Chinese are not bad at trying to enter the markets through Belarusians. Aliyev has already bought.

        Yes, they bought ... moreover, with the option M20 ..
  6. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 05 New
    • 0
    • 12
    -12
    But in Russia it’s impossible to create a similar system
    1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 24 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      Quote: Zaurbek
      But in Russia it’s impossible to create a similar system

      They did not create it.
      They decided that the Iskander was enough.
      1. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 27 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        This system is more similar to Point (its competitor) but with 8pcs of ammunition. You can also half on Kamaz 8x8. To do. Budget and efficient.
        1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 34 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Zaurbek
          This system is more similar to Point (its competitor) but with 8pcs of ammunition.

          I read that there KVO under 600 meters.
          It seems that this is still the MLRS.

          Again, “Point” was abandoned for the sake of “cost optimization” Like Iot “Hurricanes”. And it seems that they finally refused
          1. Hermann 12 May 2020 10: 50 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Do you mean the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus abandoned the Points and the Uranans?
            1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 57 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation under Medvedev-Serdyukov abandoned the "Point" and "Hurricane".
              “Alloy” proactively continued work on 220 mm RS
              Kolomna, unfortunately, could not continue to work on the "Point" or did not want to.
              1. Hermann 12 May 2020 11: 07 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Well, Uranan remained in the arsenal of the RF Armed Forces, it is being changed to Hurricane-1M and the point is being changed by Iskander. Tell me, do you think you need a floating dispenser of a division link (a modern analogue of the Point)?
                1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 17 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: Herman
                  Well, Uranan remained in the arsenal of the RF Armed Forces, it is being replaced with Hurricane-1M

                  Where "change"? I'm afraid you are ahead of the curve.
                  But there is still an opportunity. Because the management of "Fusion" scored on the Wise and Far-sighted

                  Quote: Herman
                  Tell me, do you think you need a floating dispenser of a division link (a modern analogue of the Point)?

                  Floating? Not necessary. In modern conditions, air transport and air mobility, I think, is more important
                  We need a fuel dispenser of the divisional level, perhaps even less powerful than the “Point”. The head part of half a ton is probably somewhat redundant with modern guidance systems.
                2. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 14: 59 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  It is an analogue, but only in range ..... with 8 missiles. Efficiency is greater. And the Chinese have one machine with Iskander missiles and these ...
              2. Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 25 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                A tornado can not perform such tasks?
                1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 19: 00 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  "Tornado" / "Tornado-S" is a MLRS. And they must fulfill their tasks.
                  Their firing units are already so small, it is impractical to distract the launchers from using them as fuel dispensers.

                  Yes, and very few of them are very, very ..
          2. Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 59 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Hurricane ... Sorry by the way! I really liked the telegraph poles. And after all, the enemy’s positions were beautiful.
            1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 02 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: Nehist
              Hurricane ... Sorry by the way!

              With "Hurricane", it seems, decided to "roll back"
              1. Nehist 12 May 2020 11: 05 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Well, if so, then glad
                1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 10 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  While "pitchfork in the water."
                  On the one hand, the installation is already in the Mikhailovsky Academy (the only high school that trains artillerymen.
                  On the other hand, apparently, they continue to save by sawing Tornadoes into Tornado-S
              2. Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 11: 06 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                MLRS Uragan-1M in service since 2016.Distance 120 km.
                https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD-1%D0%9C
              3. Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 11: 12 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Hurricane-1M enters the army since 2016.
                The new multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) "Hurricane-1M" began to enter the arsenal of the Russian army - the Russian Ministry of Defense and the manufacturer of the complex are currently discussing the prospects of increasing its supplies, Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov told reporters on Friday.

                https://www.arms-expo.ru/news/novye-razrabotki/novaya-rszo-uragan-1m-nachala-postupat-na-vooruzhenie-rossiyskoy-armii/
          3. venik 12 May 2020 11: 42 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Spade
            I read that there KVO under 600 meters.
            It seems that this is still the MLRS.

            =======
            600 meters - this is for the Chinese WS-2 / WS-2D with a firing range of 400 km. According to Belarusian data, for Polonaise systems with missiles of the 1st modification (up to 200 km), the KVO when firing at maximum range using the combined guidance system (ANN + satellite correction), the KVO was brought up to 30-50 m. To what extent is this true - alas! (not to me)....
            1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 43 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: venik
              KVO managed to bring up to 30-50 m.

              This is still a lot for the fuel dispenser.
              For MLRS, it’s quite normal, even excellent
              1. venik 12 May 2020 11: 59 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Spade
                This is still a lot for the fuel dispenser.
                For MLRS, it’s quite normal, even excellent

                ========
                Am I arguing? In 9M723-1 with correlation IR GOS, it’s 5-7 meters in general!
                By the way, they refused from the Tochka precisely because it was hopelessly losing to the Iskander in all respects (range, speed, CVO, etc.), moreover, the entire 9M79 missile family could not maneuver along the trajectory.
                But the information that the “Hurricane” refused - how reliable? This is news to me, so news .....
                Why then ask "manifest" was to invent a bicaliber "Hurricane-M" ???
          4. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 12: 54 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            If you take the original Chinese system as a sample. then we will see two types of equipment:
            1. 2pcs rockets in individual transport launch containers. I do not know the caliber, but the range is under 700 km.
            2. 8pcs 301mm rockets in the same containers with a range of under 300km
          5. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 14: 44 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            No, it's a rocket corr ...
  7. Tuzik 12 May 2020 10: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Polonaise is capable of holding back NATO’s major forces from southeastern Poland with its several military bases to the territories of the Baltic republics with their ever-growing concentration of NATO military contingent


    only if you equip special warhead
    1. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Accuracy will make it possible with a conventional warhead.
  8. Emphasis 12 May 2020 10: 16 New
    • 13
    • 3
    +10
    Based on recent political events, it is highly doubtful that Belarus would be going to restrain anyone. Another manipulation of the authors. I remember how there was an article here that Hungary was preparing to attack Ukraine with leopard tanks.
    Those and the whole question on the article. What kind of containment are we talking about? Can the armies of the listed NATO countries be restrained by the MLRS alone and even in such numbers ???
    This is something like: I have a gun and I can restrain the army of any country !!! Well, at least I can shoot at them and they are afraid of that !!! And what they will do with me for this later is a completely different matter.
    But in general, I can’t recall that Lukashenko would threaten to restrain someone? He seems to be establishing economic cooperation
    1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 26 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Accent
      Based on recent political events, it is highly doubtful that Belarus would be going to restrain anyone.

      Come on....
      Lukashenko sleeps and sees himself as the second Gaddafi?
      1. Emphasis 12 May 2020 14: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        On the one hand, yes. So on the other hand, they do not promise him any special prospects. In a union state, he personally doesn’t shine anything good. Therefore maneuvers
    2. Zaurbek 12 May 2020 12: 56 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It is possible that you need a "Long Arm" ... and what else can Belarus threaten with enemies? Aviation is very expensive.
  9. Sergei 777 12 May 2020 10: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Polonaise is a very cool thing. Confuse only the Chinese roots in rockets. And so ... The range is excellent. Accuracy according to official information is acceptable. And the amount is serious.
  10. Yaro Polk 12 May 2020 10: 49 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    But father will soon be asked to disarm because of the West’s loyalty to him, and the removal of all sanctions — which he will do with a smile.
    1. Lopatov 12 May 2020 15: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Yaro Polk
      But father will soon be asked to disarm because of the West’s loyalty to him, and the removal of all sanctions — which he will do with a smile.

      How Gaddafi disarmed?
      Lukashenko does not seem so stupid as to repeat the "Libyan experience of democracy"
      1. Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 20: 31 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Alas, he has been actively lying under the United States recently and carefully cultivating zmagors, because the states promised him that the Zmagars are against Russia, of course they will lie, in my opinion this is the worst thing he could do ...
  11. rotmistr60 12 May 2020 11: 04 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    the army of Belarus even by oneself...
    Well, if "even" then of course. And if you enable logical thinking? In what case will the army of Belarus be forced to strike? Only in case of an attack on her. And it can be hit only if the war between NATO and Russia begins. So it turns out that no "alone" simply does not exist. And the article is most likely from the Belarusian media.
  12. Pavel57 12 May 2020 11: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Does China supply fuel for Polonaise?
    1. Nikolaevich I 12 May 2020 11: 21 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Pavel57
      Does China supply fuel for Polonaise?

      Yes, there was a statement recently by the Syabrs that the production of rocket engines for the Polonez managed to be 100% established in Belarus ...
  13. prior 12 May 2020 11: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    MLRS "Polonaise".
    The name is music for the ears.
  14. strannik1985 12 May 2020 11: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Hug and cry. Military Balance for 2019 indicates the presence of 4 (four!) BM Polonaise. In the NE of Azerbaijan, and even more (6 ~ 10 BM).
  15. Viktor Sergeev 12 May 2020 13: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Are you laughing What can keep the SZO? One hit and none. Russia is holding them back.
  16. Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In addition to the RSZO, good air defense is needed in order to cover airborne complexes, and 300 is certainly serious.
  17. Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In addition to the RSZO, good air defense is needed in order to cover airborne complexes, and 300 is certainly serious.
  18. KOLORADO73 13 May 2020 16: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Turn on and remember Scorpions Wind of Change and Still loving you!