Military Review

Belorussian Armed Forces MLRS “Polonaise” are capable of keeping NATO bases in Poland and the Baltic at gunpoint

79

The personnel of the Belarusian military parade of May 9, 2020 flew around many countries of the world. A special, so to speak, response to the military parade is caused in a number of NATO countries. Attention was drawn, in particular, to the Polonaise multiple launch rocket systems that had been in the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus for about 4 years.


NATO countries are concerned about the increasingly evolving characteristics of the Belarusian strike systems, namely, the range of target destruction. The maximum range for hitting targets for Polonaise missiles is 300 km. When these systems are placed along the western borders of the Republic of Belarus, parts of those NATO groups located in Poland and the Baltic States fall into the affected area. Under the spot are several bases of the North Atlantic military bloc.

For example, from Brest to Warsaw about 250 km, from the border regions of the Grodno region to the Lithuanian Šiauliai airfield, where the British air units with "Typhoons" are located, in a straight line - about 290 km. About 300 km from the same border territories of the Grodno region to the port infrastructure of the Lithuanian Klaipeda, where NATO shipping is often unloaded. The notorious Suvalki corridor is completely “shot through”, “more and more forces and means are being allocated to NATO” for “defense”.



Thus, the Belarusian army, even alone, possessing such powerful and long-range weapons as the 301-mm B-200 Polonaise, is capable of holding back large NATO forces from southeastern Poland with its several military bases to the territories of the Baltic Republics with more and more of them the growing concentration of the NATO military contingent.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parkello
    parkello 12 May 2020 09: 46 New
    0
    the ardor clearly diminished. otherwise they still can’t digest Kaliningrad. and they won’t be able to.
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 12 May 2020 09: 52 New
      +6
      Quote: parkello
      Kaliningrad can not digest. And can not.

      Даже немцы,с их извечной "фантомной болью" в отношении бывшей Восточной Пруссии не так беспокойны как поляки,которым Калининград - колющая до невыносимости "шпилька"...
      1. parkello
        parkello 12 May 2020 10: 07 New
        21
        the Germans had long forgotten about him .. they understand that they can’t see their ears in Kaliningrad. and the Poles have woken up, they didn’t have enough Belarusian and Ukrainian lands ... haven’t gotten drunk yet. I worked with them in Athens. with the Polish brigade. on the installation of iron structures. out of 10 Poles, 1 was normal. and even that is probably because he was too old, and in the USSR he often went to work in the Far North. they paid well there. that's just with him I talked after work. the rest ... as our Greeks say, take one and hit them the second .. very ambitious and daring ... well, there really is where it goes. where insolence does not channel as an argument, they prefer to drive on. one day they got drunk a lot, ran into shorter .. I did not stand on ceremony, I had an Albanian TT. I took it out and asked if anyone wants to check how I shoot, even when I'm drunk. they immediately remembered that we were allies, and so on ... what’s like? we are each other ... I’m not saying WE are each other. but I am now ... you’ve cleaned well in time. I would not want to take so much sin on my soul because of other people's rudeness. but they did not understand other words. fooling around. mol not in our say ... I like this type of understand. I’m happy to put the whole clip ... and you’ll quickly understand everything, not even on your own. two more Greeks, their kents climbed in, began to reassure, they say no, we are all at work ... to bury these freaks. hands itch. they were not given rest that I was from Georgia, but Greek citizenship. and I get like a Greek, for every extra hour of work .. you are jealous of such. I was lucky that I had a gun, which they did not know about. and so they would dig me ... and healthy ones you know, you’ll break a hell of it, just shoot request
        1. Nehist
          Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 53 New
          -13
          Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be held back. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply. There is a real group of suicide bombers which at its cost will allow the IOB to unfold. Although given that we are going on, we are not able to deploy even a million army. There are not so many trained reserves. I understand that we are old bisons with their radiculitis and heart attacks suffered even more like those who can pick up weapons. But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes
          1. Thrall
            Thrall 12 May 2020 11: 10 New
            +1
            Thus, the army of Belarus, even alone, possessing such powerful and long-range weapons as the 301-mm B-200 Polonaise

            На 300 км(почти) стреляет B-300 "Полонез М"
            1. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 12 May 2020 11: 34 New
              +5
              Когда "только-только" появились первые сообщения о предстоящим производстве в Белоруссии РСЗО "Полонез" с китайскими ракетами , то было упомянуто в одной статье , что система должна быть ,в конце концов, бикалиберной... к 301-мм "эрэсам"намечается добавить ,в последствии, 370-мм боеприпасы... тоже "китайский" калибр.
            2. knn54
              knn54 12 May 2020 13: 46 New
              +1
              А то,что у "Топора" (коих у НАТО немало) дальность полета в пять раз больше,автор в курсе?
              1. Lopatov
                Lopatov 12 May 2020 15: 47 New
                +3
                Quote: knn54
                А то,что у "Топора" (коих у НАТО немало) дальность полета в пять раз больше,автор в курсе?

                So what?
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich 12 May 2020 11: 21 New
            10
            Quote: Nehist
            Although given that we are going on, we are not able to deploy even a million army. There are not so many trained reserves.

            Yeah. and they have it all.
            Quote: Nehist
            But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes


            And THEIR blue hamster generation of iPhone-directly, after all, the special forces eryo! lol

            do you even look WHO their поколения работает-на заводе рабочим, крестьянинином-руками в поле и пр? НИКТО. Они, да, "навоюют" yes
          3. Hagen
            Hagen 12 May 2020 11: 37 New
            11
            Quote: Nehist
            I understand that we are old bisons with their radiculitis and heart attacks suffered even more like those who can pick up weapons. But the current generation does not inspire me any hopes

            Вы растет "нынешнее поколение" и скажет ровно то, что и вы. Древние греки своих детей крыли нашими словами. Отцы и дети - старый конфликт. Но 6 рота не сдалась, не сдадут и сегодня. Я уверен.
          4. alone
            alone 12 May 2020 12: 38 New
            +1
            Quote: Nehist
            Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be restrained. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply.

            What war? What retention? If there is a war, it will be nuclear ... After such a war, if someone survives, it will be possible to hold only sticks and stones
          5. Marconi41
            Marconi41 12 May 2020 22: 08 New
            +1
            Quote: Nehist
            Hmm, in the event of a conflict, Kaliningrad cannot be restrained. Alas, the fleet cannot provide the supply.

            Да ладно Вам. В случае конфликта снабжение будет осуществляться железнодорожным транспортом. Правда независимостью некоторых прибалтийский "тигров" придется пожертвовать. Так что Калининграду нужно будет продержаться не больше дней десяти.
          6. GTYCBJYTH2021
            GTYCBJYTH2021 13 May 2020 18: 17 New
            0
            I agree with you .... I won’t be able to attack, but I still have the strength to cover the flanks ..... And years later, through .... only partisan .....
        2. seregatara1969
          seregatara1969 12 May 2020 12: 57 New
          +2
          Fuck you need karate, if there is TT! In the case of education, once in the knee to shoot fifty times better than educational conversation. This case is an example. The Greeks in the union were always full. But immediately bring up a whole group - they will come home and talk about the positive experience. I did it right.
        3. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 14: 34 New
          +2
          The Germans would rather remember the German Danzig and Slesien and Silesia, the Poles would not be in the way of diapers ...
          1. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 12 May 2020 20: 27 New
            +1
            At the moment, the Polish army is more combat-ready than the Bundeswehr.
    2. Bar1
      Bar1 12 May 2020 11: 37 New
      +1
      this nata is already tired. Belarus and Russia should share the Baltic states and reduce the threat to the Russian peace.
      1. seregatara1969
        seregatara1969 12 May 2020 13: 00 New
        +2
        Cho to share it? There is a receipt on the purchase of the entire Baltic states together with the people from Sweden by Russia for one annual budget of Sweden. Let them redeem themselves according to the Eurozone, Ordnung is Ordnung.
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 14: 35 New
          +2
          By the way, yes, let them pay and repent.
        2. Bar1
          Bar1 12 May 2020 19: 10 New
          +1
          Quote: seregatara1969
          Let them redeem themselves according to the Eurozone, Ordnung is Ordnung.

          money is garbage, the main thing is security, while the Baltic states will be, there will be no peace for us.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 May 2020 09: 46 New
    -1
    NATO countries are concerned about the increasingly evolving characteristics of the Belarusian strike systems, namely, the range of target destruction.
    Так пусть и дальше "беспокоятся" в нате, и помнят куда могут долететь ракетки "Полонеза".
  3. Sailor
    Sailor 12 May 2020 09: 49 New
    +2
    Here I consider it fraternally !!!
  4. svp67
    svp67 12 May 2020 09: 50 New
    +2
    Ну, что этот "огненный продукт" китайско-белорусского сотрудничества довольно "весомый аргумент" в любом споре...
    1. novel66
      novel66 12 May 2020 09: 56 New
      +7
      yes Old Man somehow behaves ... maybe they will not be needed
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 12 May 2020 10: 37 New
        +3
        Most likely they will not be needed. This author took the TTX and dreamed that Belarus would declare war on NATO. A strange assumption ...
        1. novel66
          novel66 12 May 2020 10: 38 New
          +5
          no, well, you can dream
    2. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 12 May 2020 10: 00 New
      +6
      Quote: svp67
      довольно "весомый аргумент" в любом споре.

      And the priority goal with the negative development of this dispute. Especially when they are concentrated in the border areas (if used for situations and purposes described in the note. Again, their number is small. And the system with the transition class shells from the MLRS to the OTRK (for exact characteristics) is excellent
    3. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 10: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      Ну, что этот "огненный продукт" китайско-белорусского сотрудничества довольно "весомый аргумент" в любом споре...


      Belarusians actually localized the production of Chinese MLRS. Here and all the cooperation.

      По известным данным, РСЗО "Полонез" использует дальнобойные высокоточные 301-мм ракеты типа А200 разработки и производства китайской China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT, также известной как «Первая Академия»), входящей в состав китайской государственной аэрокосмической корпорации China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC). На мировом рынке маркетинг системы А200 осуществляется входящим в CASC внешнеторговым объединением Aerospace Long-March International Trade Co., Ltd (ALIT), а также известной китайской корпорацией Poly Technologies. Совместная разработка РСЗО "Полонез" на основе ракет А200 осуществлялась в соответствии с заключенным в 2013 году китайско-белорусским межправительственным соглашением.

      Белоруссия, по-видимому, стала стартовым заказчиком ракетной системы А200. Ракета А200 при калибре 301 мм имеет длину 7264 мм и размах стабилизаторов 615 мм. Масса ракеты 750 кг. Боевая часть (трех разных типов) отделяемая, система наведения комбинированная - инерциальная со спутниковой коррекцией (GPS). Дальность стрельбы от 50 до "более 200" км. КВО боевой части на максимальной дальности в разных источниках заявляется от 30 до 50 м. Залп из восьми ракет по восьми разным целям может быть произведен за 50 секунд, время подготовки к залпу - 8 минут.
      Государственные испытания РСЗО "Полонез" были завершены в Белоруссии 30 мая 2016 года.


      In May 2017, the 8th International Exhibition of Arms and Military Equipment MILEX-2017 for the first time demonstrated an operational-tactical ballistic missile with an official range of up to 300 km, which should be introduced into the modified Polonaise system, which passed fire tests on October 26 .

      Cудя по представленному на MILEX-2017 макетному образцу с характерным обликом, эта оперативно-тактическая ракета является ракетой М20 разработки и производства все той же китайской CALT. Ракетный комплекс М20 рекламируется СALT с 2011 года, имея заявленные максимальную дальность до 280 км и вес боевой части 480 кг. Система наведения М20 комбинированная - инерциальная со спутниковой коррекцией (GPS), КВО ракеты на максимальной дальности заявлено в 30 м. Ракета летит по "квазибаллистической" траектории.

      Другой "ракетой с дальностью стрельбы 300 км" может быть также разработанная CALT ракета А300.

      С 2014 года CALT рекламирует единый универсальный ракетный комплекс GATSS (General Army Tactical Strike System), использующий с одной пусковой установки ракеты типов А100, А200, А300 и М20, а также сверхзвуковые противокорабельные ракеты CX-1 (последние выглядят как клон российской ракеты "Оникс"/"Яхонт"). Фактически модифицированный "Полонез", видимо, и является комплексом GATTS.

      https://imp-navigator.livejournal.com/671627.html
      1. svp67
        svp67 12 May 2020 10: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Belarusians actually localized the production of Chinese MLRS

        И "базовое шасси" тоже локализовали?
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 12 May 2020 10: 33 New
          +9
          Yeah, the Chinese - their chassis based on Wanshan tractors, was created in close partnership with the MZKT.
          1. Nehist
            Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 57 New
            +2
            It is quite logical. What for inventing no analogue. When can you safely combine a good Chinese missile with a good Belarusian chassis? !!
            1. Incvizitor
              Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 16 New
              0
              What for something to invent, it is better to be an agricultural laughing power cattle graze and plant radishes.
        2. Topol M
          Topol M 12 May 2020 11: 41 New
          +3
          Stump! You probably haven’t heard about the MZKT, the Strategic Missile Forces on Minsk tractors, you yourself drummed on Pioneer and Topol from 79 to 89. A missile is a missile, you won’t shoot it from a water pipe, the launch system is Belarusian. And the transfusion systems on modern tanks of the Russian Federation, do you happen to know who delivers?
  5. Hagen
    Hagen 12 May 2020 10: 04 New
    +3
    The maximum range for hitting targets for Polonaise missiles is 300 km.

    It is not clear where the catch is in this characteristic. Polonaise uses (according to open sources) the Chinese A-200 rocket. In its mass and overall parameters, it is close to 9M542. But more than 2 times superior in range. What is true here, what is the reason for such a run of characteristics? Other fuels, other rocket speeds or something else? In any case, at first glance there is reason for a wary perception of such news. Maybe one of the rocket specialists will shed light on the question. Are we behind China? Or how?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 12 May 2020 10: 44 New
      +4
      Well, everything seems to be open there. The launch stage throws the rocket at 35-45km, and then it goes on the march quasi-ballistic with corrections and maneuvers.


      In general, the system is quite in demand, and the Chinese are not bad at trying to enter the markets through Belarusians. Aliyev has already bought.


      There, among the M20 offers, there is the Chinese version of the Iskander 480kg by 280km in the export offer, Belarusians are already friends of the rocket with the chassis.


      chinese version
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: donavi49
        Belarusians are already friends with the rocket chassis.

        Там вроде бы ничего "дружить" не надо.
        As far as I read, you need to pair the rocket with the control system.
      2. alone
        alone 12 May 2020 12: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: donavi49
        In general, the system is quite in demand, and the Chinese are not bad at trying to enter the markets through Belarusians. Aliyev has already bought.

        Yes, they bought ... moreover, with the option M20 ..
  6. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 05 New
    -12
    But in Russia it’s impossible to create a similar system
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 24 New
      +8
      Quote: Zaurbek
      But in Russia it’s impossible to create a similar system

      They did not create it.
      Решили, что "Искандера" достаточно.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 27 New
        -1
        This system is more similar to Point (its competitor) but with 8pcs of ammunition. You can also half on Kamaz 8x8. To do. Budget and efficient.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 34 New
          +3
          Quote: Zaurbek
          This system is more similar to Point (its competitor) but with 8pcs of ammunition.

          I read that there KVO under 600 meters.
          It seems that this is still the MLRS.

          От "Точки" отказались опять таки ради "оптимизации расходов" Как иот "Ураганов". И похоже, что окончательно отказались
          1. Hermann
            Hermann 12 May 2020 10: 50 New
            0
            Do you mean the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus abandoned the Points and the Uranans?
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 57 New
              +4
              ВС РФ при Медведеве-Сердюкове отказались от "Точки" и "Урагана".
              "Сплав" в инициативном порядке продолжил работы по 220-мм РС
              Коломна, к сожалению, работы по "Точке" продолжить не смогла или не захотела.
              1. Hermann
                Hermann 12 May 2020 11: 07 New
                +1
                Well, Uranan remained in the arsenal of the RF Armed Forces, it is being changed to Hurricane-1M and the point is being changed by Iskander. Tell me, do you think you need a floating dispenser of a division link (a modern analogue of the Point)?
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 17 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Herman
                  Well, Uranan remained in the arsenal of the RF Armed Forces, it is being replaced with Hurricane-1M

                  Где "меняют"? Боюсь, Вы опережаете события.
                  Но возможность пока есть. Потому что руководство "Сплава" забило на Мудрых и Дальновидных

                  Quote: Herman
                  Tell me, do you think you need a floating dispenser of a division link (a modern analogue of the Point)?

                  Floating? Not necessary. In modern conditions, air transport and air mobility, I think, is more important
                  Нужен ТРК дивизионного уровня, возможно даже менее могущественный, чем "Точка" Головная часть в пол тонны, возможно, несколько избыточна при современных системах наведения
                2. Zaurbek
                  Zaurbek 12 May 2020 14: 59 New
                  -1
                  It is an analogue, but only in range ..... with 8 missiles. Efficiency is greater. And the Chinese have one machine with Iskander missiles and these ...
              2. Incvizitor
                Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 25 New
                0
                A tornado can not perform such tasks?
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 12 May 2020 19: 00 New
                  +1
                  "Смерч"/"Торнадо-С" это РСЗО. И они должны выполнять свои задачи.
                  Their firing units are already so small, it is impractical to distract the launchers from using them as fuel dispensers.

                  Yes, and very few of them are very, very ..
          2. Nehist
            Nehist 12 May 2020 10: 59 New
            +2
            Hurricane ... Sorry by the way! I really liked the telegraph poles. And after all, the enemy’s positions were beautiful.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 02 New
              +3
              Quote: Nehist
              Hurricane ... Sorry by the way!

              С "Ураганом", похоже, решили "откатить"
              1. Nehist
                Nehist 12 May 2020 11: 05 New
                +1
                Well, if so, then glad
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 10 New
                  +3
                  Пока "вилами по воде".
                  On the one hand, the installation is already in the Mikhailovsky Academy (the only high school that trains artillerymen.
                  С другой стороны, судя по всему, продолжают экономить, перепиливая "Смерчи" в "Торнадо-С"
              2. Sky strike fighter
                Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 11: 06 New
                +3
                MLRS Uragan-1M in service since 2016.Distance 120 km.
                https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD-1%D0%9C
              3. Sky strike fighter
                Sky strike fighter 12 May 2020 11: 12 New
                +4
                Hurricane-1M enters the army since 2016.
                Новая реактивная система залпового огня (РСЗО) "Ураган-1М" начала поступать на вооружение российской армии — в настоящее время Минобороны России и производитель комплекса обсуждают перспективы наращивания его поставок, заявил журналистам в пятницу замминистра обороны РФ Юрий Борисов.

                https://www.arms-expo.ru/news/novye-razrabotki/novaya-rszo-uragan-1m-nachala-postupat-na-vooruzhenie-rossiyskoy-armii/
          3. venik
            venik 12 May 2020 11: 42 New
            +2
            Quote: Spade
            I read that there KVO under 600 meters.
            It seems that this is still the MLRS.

            =======
            600 метров - это для китайских WS-2 / WS-2D с дальностью стрельбы 400 км. По белорусским данным, для систем "Полонез" с ракетами 1-й модификации (до 200 км) КВО при стрельбе на максимальную дальность с использованием комбинированной системы наведения (ИНС + спутниковая коррекция) КВО удалось довести до 30-50 м. Насколько это соответствует действительности - увы! (не ко мне)....
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 12 May 2020 11: 43 New
              +3
              Quote: venik
              KVO managed to bring up to 30-50 m.

              This is still a lot for the fuel dispenser.
              For MLRS, it’s quite normal, even excellent
              1. venik
                venik 12 May 2020 11: 59 New
                +2
                Quote: Spade
                This is still a lot for the fuel dispenser.
                For MLRS, it’s quite normal, even excellent

                ========
                Am I arguing? In 9M723-1 with correlation IR GOS, it’s 5-7 meters in general!
                Кстати от "Точки" именно поэтому и отказались - она безнадежно проигрывала "Искандеру" по всем параметрам (дальность, скорость, КВО и т.д.), к тому же все семейство ракет 9М79 не могло маневрировать на траектории.
                А вот сведения, что от "Урагана" отказались - насколько достоверны? Это для меня новость, так новость.....
                На кой тогда спрашивается "манифиг" было изобретать бикалиберный "Ураган-М"???
          4. Zaurbek
            Zaurbek 12 May 2020 12: 54 New
            -1
            If you take the original Chinese system as a sample. then we will see two types of equipment:
            1. 2pcs rockets in individual transport launch containers. I do not know the caliber, but the range is under 700 km.
            2. 8pcs 301mm rockets in the same containers with a range of under 300km
          5. Zaurbek
            Zaurbek 12 May 2020 14: 44 New
            -1
            No, it's a rocket corr ...
  7. Tuzik
    Tuzik 12 May 2020 10: 14 New
    0
    Polonaise is capable of holding back NATO’s major forces from southeastern Poland with its several military bases to the territories of the Baltic republics with their ever-growing concentration of NATO military contingent


    only if you equip special warhead
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 12 May 2020 10: 27 New
      +1
      Accuracy will make it possible with a conventional warhead.
  8. Emphasis
    Emphasis 12 May 2020 10: 16 New
    10
    Based on recent political events, it is highly doubtful that Belarus would be going to restrain anyone. Another manipulation of the authors. I remember how there was an article here that Hungary was preparing to attack Ukraine with leopard tanks.
    Those and the whole question on the article. What kind of containment are we talking about? Can the armies of the listed NATO countries be restrained by the MLRS alone and even in such numbers ???
    This is something like: I have a gun and I can restrain the army of any country !!! Well, at least I can shoot at them and they are afraid of that !!! And what they will do with me for this later is a completely different matter.
    But in general, I can’t recall that Lukashenko would threaten to restrain someone? He seems to be establishing economic cooperation
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 12 May 2020 10: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: Accent
      Based on recent political events, it is highly doubtful that Belarus would be going to restrain anyone.

      Come on....
      Lukashenko sleeps and sees himself as the second Gaddafi?
      1. Emphasis
        Emphasis 12 May 2020 14: 44 New
        +1
        On the one hand, yes. So on the other hand, they do not promise him any special prospects. In a union state, he personally doesn’t shine anything good. Therefore maneuvers
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 12 May 2020 12: 56 New
      0
      Вполне возможно, что нужна "Длинная рука"... а чем еще Белоруссии грозить врагам? Авиация очень затратно.
  9. Sergei 777
    Sergei 777 12 May 2020 10: 30 New
    +2
    Polonaise is a very cool thing. Confuse only the Chinese roots in rockets. And so ... The range is excellent. Accuracy according to official information is acceptable. And the amount is serious.
  10. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk 12 May 2020 10: 49 New
    -2
    But father will soon be asked to disarm because of the West’s loyalty to him, and the removal of all sanctions — which he will do with a smile.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 12 May 2020 15: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Yaro Polk
      But father will soon be asked to disarm because of the West’s loyalty to him, and the removal of all sanctions — which he will do with a smile.

      How Gaddafi disarmed?
      Лукашенко не производит впечатление настолько глупого человека, чтобы повторить "ливийский опыт демократии"
      1. Cyril G ...
        Cyril G ... 12 May 2020 20: 31 New
        -1
        Alas, he has been actively lying under the United States recently and carefully cultivating zmagors, because the states promised him that the Zmagars are against Russia, of course they will lie, in my opinion this is the worst thing he could do ...
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 May 2020 11: 04 New
    +4
    the army of Belarus even by oneself...
    Ну если "даже" то тогда конечно. А если включить логическое мышление? В каком случае армия Белоруссии будет вынуждена нанести удар? Только в случае нападения на нее. А по ней могут нанести удар только в случае начала войны НАТО с Россией. Вот и получается, что никакой "в одиночку" просто не существует. А статья скорее всего из белорусских СМИ.
  12. Pavel57
    Pavel57 12 May 2020 11: 08 New
    0
    Does China supply fuel for Polonaise?
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 12 May 2020 11: 21 New
      +1
      Quote: Pavel57
      Does China supply fuel for Polonaise?

      Да было как-то недавно утверждение "сябров", что производство ракетных двигателей для "полонезов" удалось наладить на 100% в Белоруссии...
  13. prior
    prior 12 May 2020 11: 13 New
    0
    РСЗО "Полонез".
    The name is music for the ears.
  14. strannik1985
    strannik1985 12 May 2020 11: 19 New
    +1
    Обнять и плакать. Милитари Баланс за 2019 год указывает на наличие 4(четырех!) БМ "Полонез". В СВ Азербайджана и то больше(6~10 БМ).
  15. Viktor Sergeev
    Viktor Sergeev 12 May 2020 13: 14 New
    0
    Are you laughing What can keep the SZO? One hit and none. Russia is holding them back.
  16. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 10 New
    0
    In addition to the RSZO, good air defense is needed in order to cover airborne complexes, and 300 is certainly serious.
  17. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 12 May 2020 18: 10 New
    0
    In addition to the RSZO, good air defense is needed in order to cover airborne complexes, and 300 is certainly serious.
  18. KOLORADO73
    KOLORADO73 13 May 2020 16: 56 New
    0
    Turn on and remember Scorpions Wind of Change and Still loving you!
  19. Observer2014
    Observer2014 1 August 2020 12: 14 New
    -4
    Will they be pulled right to the border to strike? Well, so that everything that is painted over in red on the maps is under attack?