Germany decides on storage of US nuclear weapons, Poland ready to accept American nuclear weapons


The issue of nuclear withdrawal weapons The USA from Germany in recent years has been rising more and more. The discussion in German society is closely watched in neighboring Poland and there are reasons for this.


As you know, nuclear warheads were deployed by Americans in Europe, including Germany, during the Cold War, as a counterweight to the Soviet Union and its nuclear arsenal. But thirty years have passed since the collapse of the USSR, and the American military still remains in Germany.

This situation does not suit many Germans who believe that a military presence not only degrades national dignity, but also poses a threat to the environmental safety of the population. After all, the deployment of nuclear weapons always carries with it certain risks - in the event of an armed conflict with Russia, Russian missiles will be hit, first of all, by military facilities with American nuclear weapons, but without conflict there is little good that there is always the likelihood of a man-made disaster.

Opinions of German authorities vary


The leader of the SPD parliamentary faction, Rolf Mutzenich, called on the German authorities to organize the withdrawal of American nuclear weapons from the country. SPD Chairman S. Esken supported her colleague, stressing that it is better to spend money on the fight against social inequality and on raising the level of education of the population, rather than on nuclear weapons.

However, the German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, although he himself belongs to the SPD, reacted very skeptically to the position of the leaders of the Social Democrats. He believes that Germany should not quarrel with the most important partner in NATO - the United States. Representatives of the CDU / CSU right-wing party, to which German Chancellor Angela Merkel belongs, also opposed the withdrawal of nuclear weapons.

At the same time, the probability of the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons from the territory of Germany remains quite high, at least under the next chancellor, especially if the SPD wins, such a scenario may well become a reality. And then what? Many German experts believe that the United States will not refuse to deploy nuclear weapons in Central and Eastern Europe and will simply transfer its facilities to neighboring Poland. This, in turn, will only contribute to a further increase in tension in relations with Russia.

In Poland itself, the discussion is being watched closely. Unfortunately, among many representatives of the Polish public, the belligerent mood prevails over common sense. They seek to rattle with weapons, even at risk for their own safety.

For example, someone Sisauer writes:

Poland does not want American nuclear weapons. Poland wants its own nuclear weapons.

Another Polish commentator claims that Poland has every opportunity to deploy American nuclear weapons:

All you have to do is bring the bunkers back to life in Miedzyrzecz, where the Soviet Union kept its nuclear weapons until 1989. These silos are still in excellent condition.

Commentator Julian calls for the deployment of any quantity of nuclear weapons in Poland, as Germany allegedly sided with Russia long ago and would enter into trade and military alliances with it. The United States, according to the commentator, is the only reliable ally for Poland. Obviously, the masochistic love for such an ally is so great that the commenter is even ready to accept death in the event of a preemptive strike on American nuclear facilities in Poland, as well as the consequences of a possible technological disaster.

In Poland, it is made clear that the deployment of American weapons on their territory (primarily the tactical aviation-based nuclear warheads) is not impossible for Warsaw in principle.

Apparently, arguing about the desirability of deploying American nuclear weapons, Polish commentators are not quite aware of the size of Poland. Meanwhile, Poland is not Russia, not China and not the USA. Nuclear facilities will have to be located in densely populated areas, with all the ensuing risks.

But it is difficult for amateurs to rattle with arms to take a sober look at this situation, to calculate all the possible prospects for Poland in order to understand: placing nuclear weapons on their territory is not so much a privilege as a tremendous responsibility and a very big danger.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy 5 May 2020 14: 19 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Germany decides on storage of US nuclear weapons, Poland ready to accept American nuclear weapons
    The Poles make decisions, and we need to change missile guidance programs for the target, oh-ho-ho. repeat
    1. Sky strike fighter 5 May 2020 16: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Two dozen B-61s in Büchel to calm the former members of the Warsaw Pact, the same Poland, as well as the bomb in Germany - this is an element of restraining the ambitions of Warsaw.
      “Germany may abandon nuclear deterrence,” said Ulrich Speck, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Foundation in Washington. “This will force Poland to rethink the problem of nuclear deterrence.” And this will prompt Russia to strengthen its influence in Central and Eastern Europe. Result: more conflicts in the East, Europe weakened. ” The chairman of the Munich Security Conference, Wolfgang Ischinger, agrees.

      According to him, Germany’s refusal of the American atomic bomb will lead to Poland seeing itself as “abandoned by Berlin” and “surrendered to Moscow”. This will mean "the end of the idea of ​​European defense." Therefore, the Germans need to "stick to the United States." As Ishinger rhetorically asks, “Do we want even more US forces, perhaps even nuclear weapons, to be deployed in Poland instead of Germany?” Does the SPD know about Russia's possible reaction to this? ” True, it should be noted that the Poles themselves for the last time at the official level raised the question of placing American atomic bombs on their land in December 2015. This possibility was discussed at NATO headquarters Tomasz Shatkowski, who at that time was the deputy minister of national defense, now - the Polish ambassador to the alliance. But it is a long road. Although a certain signal of progress on it may be the purchase by Warsaw of American F-35 aircraft. F-16s currently in service with the Polish army are not suitable for transporting nuclear weapons. But, writes the Polish portal Defense24. pl, theoretically “after overcoming all political and legal obstacles (if possible)”, Washington could be asked to “adapt and certify future Polish F-35 atomic bomb machines”.

      The following is interesting here. The appearance in Poland of American nuclear weapons is barely visible on the horizon. But the possibility of such a scenario is nevertheless an urgent argument for German politicians and the expert community. According to this logic, it turns out that the overseas bomb in Germany is an element of restraining the ambitions of Warsaw, which otherwise will begin to show even greater ambitions, will become even more aggressive on the eastern borders of the European Union, provoking Russia. It is difficult to say whether Mutzenich kept this thesis in mind.



      Details: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2939104.html
      Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM.
      1. Mitroha 5 May 2020 16: 44 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Representatives of the CDU / CSU right-wing party, to which German Chancellor Angela Merkel belongs, also opposed the withdrawal of nuclear weapons.

        They are strange. NPPs are considered extremely harmful and destroyed for one reason only: the hypothetical possibility of an accident.
        But American nuclear weapons, which for at least two reasons can lead to the mass death of Germans, are left. Where is the logic?
        1. codetalker 5 May 2020 16: 48 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Only a sovereign state can afford logic.
        2. Sky strike fighter 5 May 2020 16: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The Germans believe that it is better to have a B-61 with them than as an alternative to the same Poland. Poland, of course, is not Ukraine, but far from Germany. It will be calmer for everyone. I quoted the reflections of German experts on this subject above.
          1. Mitroha 5 May 2020 17: 13 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            It was necessary to ghoul Gorbachev back in 1989 to tie the situation with nuclear weapons in Europe to the unification of Germany and the GDR. Merge only after output. And it would be calmer now.
            1. Hermit 6 May 2020 00: 32 New
              • 12
              • 0
              +12
              the hunchback had a lot to do, but the traitor is a traitor
        3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Mountain shooter 5 May 2020 14: 20 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Moving tactical aviation munitions to Poland requires moving their potential carriers there ... Aircraft, of course. And not Polish, as I understand it ... I suspect that such a movement of atomic bombs will simply lead to an increase in the power of the warheads of our missiles, so that, for sure, both bunkers and air bases ... The Poles obviously started playing computer shooters. There will be no "reboot" in life!
    1. Avior 5 May 2020 14: 31 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Aircraft, of course. And not Polish, as I understand it ...

      and here it’s just not easy
      F-35 is a carrier of nuclear weapons, and the Poles recently signed a contract with the Americans.
      Who knows what the Africans will decide
      1. Mitroha 5 May 2020 16: 50 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Well, the Poles, expected in their servility, are ready to draw three hundred targets in their country, and with overlap, so that is certain.
        Like in a soap opera, dying for love. That's just that unnatural and unrequited love
        1. hydrox 5 May 2020 19: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          This is not love, but the curiosity of the ancient Neanderthals :: "What will happen if we place AO on our land?"
          And they don’t understand that the answer is one and very simple - the result will be a glass coating of several tens of square meters. km of Polish territory with 0,1 - 0,5 million dead bodies.
          PS In order to make such a number of coffins, one must begin to work already on May 10 - maybe they will be in time "for distribution"! laughing
      2. codetalker 5 May 2020 16: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        It is forbidden to transfer nuclear weapons into the hands of other countries. It is possible to store at their facilities in other countries, but not to transfer them to the armed forces of these countries. We can then send a present to Cuba and Venezuela.
        1. Avior 5 May 2020 16: 54 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          as far as I know, there was something about the transfer of arms in the event of an attack on NATO.
          pilots and equipment were specially prepared for this occasion.
        2. opus 5 May 2020 17: 22 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: codetalker
          It is possible to store at their facilities in other countries, but not to transfer them to the armed forces of these countries.

          belay
          2019 (and so every year) as part of the maneuvers called "Steadfast Noon", the use of NATO fighter-bombers with nuclear weapon simulators was developed.
          from the FRG side these were the Panavia Tornado of the 33rd tactical aviation squadron (they are located at the Buchel air base in Eifel)
          the air forces of Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Turkey also took part.
          if they are not going to transmit (never) - then why exercise?
          Quote: codetalker
          We can then send a present to Cuba and Venezuela.

          do not mix the electorate.
          1.Our ours will not give up nuclear weapons, let alone half-witted Maduro and who is there instead of Castro
          2.none who will not bring: sanctions after 2014 seem like a smile of Santa Claus
          3. in Venisuela / Cuba there is no crazy. Vietnam with the reincarnation of Kamrani sent us far and for long, and you dream about nuclear weapons under the nose of the United States
    2. tagil 5 May 2020 19: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In Europe, the Americans carried out a program to train pilots of NATO member countries on the use of nuclear weapons, which in my opinion contradicts the agreement on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. So there is no difference where nuclear weapons will be stored. In the event of war, any NATO aircraft can carry nuclear weapons. So I think we will not understand what ammunition on these planes will be for everyone and those who have provided their territory for the aircraft and those whose planes are.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. tihonmarine 5 May 2020 15: 07 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Piramidon
      And Svidomo why are silent and do not push the rolls? Vovik Zu, with your strada, however.

      Not yet evening. First, the land needs to be sold, and then the nuclear heads should be placed.
    2. orionvitt 5 May 2020 15: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Piramidon
      And Svidomo why are silent and do not push the rolls?

      They are always happy, but there is no time for the Poles. The "beloved wife" of the United States in Europe, is always ready to please the owner as you like.
  4. Andrei Nikolaevich 5 May 2020 14: 27 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    ,, Poland is the eternal prostitute of Europe ,, V. I. Lenin. Vladimir Ilyich, if only, Europe ....)
    1. tihonmarine 5 May 2020 15: 17 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      ,, Poland is the eternal prostitute of Europe ,, V. I. Lenin. Vladimir Ilyich, if only, of Europe.

      "Child of Versailles" Winston Churchill, "On the Meanness of the Poles" (1938)
      "Now, in 1938, due to such a minor issue as Teshin
      - (meaning Tieszyn Silesia, torn off by Poland from Czechoslovakia after the Munich agreement)
      - Poles broke up with all their friends in France, in England and in the USA,
      - friends who returned their common national life
      - and the help they should have needed so soon.
      We saw how now, while a glimpse of the power of Germany fell on them
      - they hastened to seize their share in the plunder and ruin of Czechoslovakia.
      - At the time of the crisis, all doors were closed for the English and French ambassadors.
      “They were not even admitted to the Polish Foreign Minister.”

      Well, if they betrayed such friends, then they betray the rest and always.
      1. Andrei Nikolaevich 5 May 2020 17: 56 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I already wrote about this somehow .. My tribe (12 years old) asks me something: ,, If Poland is so great, why is it so small? )))
  5. HAM
    HAM 5 May 2020 14: 29 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "... The United States, according to the commentator, is the only reliable ally for Poland ..."

    Self-conceit is high ..... how can consumables be an ally for the boss !?
    1. Hermit 6 May 2020 00: 24 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote: HAM
      how can consumables be an ally for the boss !?

      The boss gave them candy and said: you are my ally, and therefore you will go to die for me. And they agreed yes
  6. Walking 5 May 2020 14: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Poland, and so at gunpoint as a NATO country and because of its anti-Russian policy, and if there is nuclear weapons there will be the target of the first strike. Kamikaze.
  7. knn54 5 May 2020 14: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As the Yankees will count. So be it.
  8. Asad 5 May 2020 14: 33 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    My mother’s wife is Polish, I love her of course, but she regularly gives the same fortresses as her historical homeland!
    1. Lelek 5 May 2020 19: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: ASAD
      Asad

      hi
      Whack!
  9. Chingachguk 5 May 2020 14: 35 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Well, Poles are Poles. They also concluded a contract for the supply of liquefied gas from the United States for $ 205, although today on the world market gas is traded at 77 bucks, why not put a little atomic charges under them !!!! They are democratic, they don’t touch theirs !!! In Poland, the brains of the country's leadership have problems ....
  10. Alexga 5 May 2020 14: 42 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The behavior of Poland is the behavior of Tobaccos from Mowgli, always nodding to the one whom they consider the Master. Why wonder why this state periodically disappeared from the map of the World.
    1. Kushka 5 May 2020 16: 38 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Your truth has disappeared. And it happened.
      Now in Smolensk, then in Kiev, then in Minsk and then
      and on Sinyuha. My grandfather in WWI near Warsaw
      George received - the horse is attacked to pieces, and he only
      legs beat. In the Second World War in occupation in Mariupol was-
      a disabled person was not taken to the front. I suffered afterwards and he
      and father (kidnapped to Germany as a kid).
      nobody in the fleet touched a finger (warhead 4, zas)
  11. barin 5 May 2020 14: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Poles are numb fool
    1. Hermit 6 May 2020 00: 27 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      They can’t live in peace
  12. KCA
    KCA 5 May 2020 14: 53 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    How straight in time the picture got into the topic today
  13. Thrifty 5 May 2020 14: 55 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    As soon as Polyakhia accepts US nuclear weapons, it will be necessary to annul all agreements with them to begin with, and deliver a preventive strike to the weapons storage sites! And then this nuclear weapon will become the subject of blackmail of Russia for any reason! Only a tough forceful response will put the United States and all of NATO in its place!
    1. Polite Moose 5 May 2020 15: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Thrifty
      As soon as Polyakhia accepts US nuclear weapons, it will be necessary to annul all agreements with them to begin with, and deliver a preventive strike to the weapons storage sites!

      I think it will be much more painful for us to provide the Germans with a discount on gas and reduce trade duties. Pshekov will be torn with anger.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Free wind 5 May 2020 14: 57 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    In the event of an impact on Europe, from November to April, a radioactive cloud with the speed of the train will rush east to the Yenisei, falling on the way for the most part to Russia. It's not my fault, such is the wind rose.
    1. Sergey Averchenkov 5 May 2020 16: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It’s not true that during the time of Chernobyl I was in Vladimir and I had a counter - there was no radiation there. And you - to the Yenisei.
      1. Free wind 5 May 2020 16: 38 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Read carefully, from November to April.
        1. Sergey Averchenkov 5 May 2020 16: 40 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Sorry. In fact, you need to be careful.
  15. tihonmarine 5 May 2020 15: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "World trash" will accept everything.
  16. Pvi1206 5 May 2020 15: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Recently, the FRG has stepped up its movement to achieve independence from the United States ... sooner or later it will happen ... if the war does not hinder ...
  17. prodi 5 May 2020 15: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    a preemptive strike from the field of theoretical necessity, is becoming more and more practical from the "principle", and as they say, deeply impinge on its sovereignty
  18. Klingon 5 May 2020 15: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Merkel Party (CDU) is a pro-American lobby, the stump is clear that they are against the withdrawal of the striped arsenal. And no one really takes Maas seriously
  19. Jager 5 May 2020 16: 00 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “The Abrams battalion ?!”
    -I!
    - Infantry Regiment!
    - I!
    - Nuclear trash!
    - I!
    - Poland, yes you wait!
  20. Eroma 5 May 2020 16: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The writing style is painfully propanandist, pressing on the reader!
    The transfer of TNWs to Poland and, accordingly, the training of Polish pilots in the use of these ammunition is probably contrary to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, will the USA withdraw from this treaty?
    Then nuclear anarchy in the world will come!
    What is the world heading for? The Poles are not really going to live forever!
    1. Avior 5 May 2020 16: 34 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      The transfer of TNWs to Poland and, accordingly, the training of Polish pilots in the use of these ammunition is probably contrary to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, will the USA withdraw from this treaty?

      US tactical nuclear weapons have been in Europe and Turkey since 1954, when the NATO Strategic Concept "Shield and Sword" was adopted.
      The weapons are controlled by the US military, but Europeans are prepared for their use during the war.

      Replacing the Germans with Poles will not fundamentally solve anything, as far as one can understand. Since they didn’t go out before, it’s unlikely that they will leave after Poland.
      Only now the arms will move to the borders of Russia.
      1. codetalker 5 May 2020 17: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I have persistent doubts that this weapon is aimed at Russia. These are air bombs! More like a sword of Damocles for occupied European countries.
        1. Avior 5 May 2020 17: 18 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          according to the original plan, it was planned to use Soviet fighters from fighters in the advanced groups and near rear areas in case of their entry into the territory of NATO countries with conventional weapons. They kept them as a guarantee that the Americans would not refuse to fight for European NATO, and as a way to detain Soviet troops until the United States entered the war. Then it was believed that a war with limited use of tactical nuclear weapons was possible.
          Of course, the bombs were unsuitable as a means of a first strike into the depths of the territory of the country. They would have beaten the planes and that’s all, and then the NATO could not reach the significant centers of the USSR.
          But now the situation has changed.
          Firstly, it is supposed to use them in the internal compartments of the F-35 with some chance of a breakthrough in air defense, secondly, not only that the borders of NATO have moved much to the East, there are also countries that formally are not NATO like Ukraine, and we can not ignore the possibility of flying through such directions.
          1. codetalker 5 May 2020 17: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            their use in the internal compartments of the F-35 with some chance of an air defense breakthrough

            The fact of the matter is that with a zero chance. And the point is not whether the F-35 or other stealth is good / bad, but that you need to fly deep into the country. One could say something about missiles equipped with apples, sort of like flying up to some distance and pulnul. But not about air bombs. They can be considered as a promising means of attack on Russia (on the territory of Russia) in only one case. If total and simultaneous betrayal by the command of the RF Armed Forces is committed.
            1. Avior 5 May 2020 18: 16 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              well, there’s a theoretical chance
              I’m not sure that there is a continuous radar field to very low altitudes inclusive
              and the distance to Moscow, for example, from the Ukrainian border is 450 km in a straight line. In the days of the Union there was no such problem.
              Nobody will start a nuclear war like that (although who knows?), But all the same air defense will be intensified from possible directions.
  21. 9PA
    9PA 5 May 2020 16: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Nevertheless, it is probably safer for us to strike in Poland if something happens than in Germany. Well, the indirlik identity is also transferred there
  22. Zaurbek 5 May 2020 16: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In addition to Poland, there are the Baltic states, Bulgaria, Romania ... lackeys are enough.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. APASUS 5 May 2020 18: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I do not believe in such news, only a few countries can refuse Americans
    1. Zaurbek 6 May 2020 09: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Believe it or not, Germany is in the deep rear for NATO. And the ammunition there is needed for the F-16, Tornado, Typhoons, etc., so that they would strike at our troops in Europe ..... The borders have moved, so the arsenals will be moved closer to us. The most ideal is Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic states ....... Finland. Brothers will be happy to place such arsenals.
      1. APASUS 6 May 2020 10: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Believe it or not, Germany is in the deep rear for NATO. And the ammunition there is needed for the F-16, Tornado, Typhoons, etc., so that they would strike at our troops in Europe ..... The borders have moved, so the arsenals will be moved closer to us. The most ideal is Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic states ....... Finland. Brothers will be happy to place such arsenals.

        1 I would completely rule out Finland. There are enough pacifists and the country is not a member of NATO.
        2 Such weapons should always be in the rear, and not at the front line. The ability to capture and strike at the storage facility is increasing
        1. Zaurbek 6 May 2020 10: 05 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well, in Germany all these bases and depots were placed during the time when the Soviet troops were in Germany. I brought Finland as a geographically convenient place.
  26. Julius Caesar 5 May 2020 19: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Poles: They showed our figs to our clergymen in Washington! We will die to the last!
  27. Old26 5 May 2020 19: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Moving tactical aviation munitions to Poland requires moving their potential carriers there ... Aircraft, of course. And not Polish, as I understand it ... I suspect that such a movement of atomic bombs will simply lead to an increase in the power of the warheads of our missiles, so that, for sure, both bunkers and air bases ... The Poles obviously started playing computer shooters. There will be no "reboot" in life!

    Usually ammunition is used including airplanes of the country where they are located. If BP in Germany - German, if in Belgium - Belgian. If in Italy - Italian. If placed in Poland, then some of the BP will be carried by Polish aircraft

    Quote: Avior
    Aircraft, of course. And not Polish, as I understand it ...

    and here it’s just not easy
    F-35 is a carrier of nuclear weapons, and the Poles recently signed a contract with the Americans.
    Who knows what the Africans will decide

    EMNIP F-16 is also used as a carrier of nuclear weapons

    Quote: codetalker
    It is forbidden to transfer nuclear weapons into the hands of other countries. It is possible to store at their facilities in other countries, but not to transfer them to the armed forces of these countries. We can then send a present to Cuba and Venezuela.

    But no one transmits. Pilots of NATO countries are learning to use nuclear warheads, but this does not mean that it has been transferred to NATO countries. Of course, at the start of hostilities no one will pay attention to this ...

    Quote: Thrifty
    As soon as Polyakhia accepts US nuclear weapons, it will be necessary to annul all agreements with them to begin with, and deliver a preventive strike to the weapons storage sites! And then this nuclear weapon will become the subject of blackmail of Russia for any reason! Only a tough forceful response will put the United States and all of NATO in its place!

    And let's blow it all up. but we’ll immediately go to heaven, and then they are tormented then to hell? What kind of an idiotic habit of delivering a preventive strike, sorry? Do you hope to survive with this mess? Or do you think that after that the nuclear mess will not start ????
    Now, nobody is blackmailing us with something, but here they will transfer us a hundred or two kilometers east and immediately begin to blackmail us ???


    Quote: Eroma
    The transfer of TNWs to Poland and, accordingly, the training of Polish pilots in the use of these ammunition is probably contrary to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, will the USA withdraw from this treaty?

    This is not contrary to the contract. You can teach how to use. Control and nuclear weapons themselves cannot be transferred. At one time, we also trained Czechs, Germans, Poles, Hungarians (wherever our arsenals of nuclear weapons were).
    1. Avior 5 May 2020 20: 49 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      EMNIP F-16 is also used as a carrier of nuclear weapons

      Yes you are right.
      But the F-35 is more promising.
      In internal compartments, stealth remains
  28. Old26 5 May 2020 21: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Avior
    EMNIP F-16 is also used as a carrier of nuclear weapons

    Yes you are right.
    But the F-35 is more promising.
    In internal compartments, stealth remains

    What is more promising - no one doubts, Sergey! Simply, even if the contract for the F-35 is not implemented, then in case of the redeployment of nuclear warheads from Germany to Poland, the Poles have carriers
    1. Avior 5 May 2020 21: 44 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      yes, I agree.
      Only, perhaps, they will need to be equipped, but this is an unprincipled issue.
      From the technical side there are no obstacles in this matter, it all depends on a political decision
  29. toha124 5 May 2020 22: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The question is - why should the Americans store their special ammunition (mainly air bombs, if I understand correctly) in Poland? The issue of logistics. If a decision is made on the use of nuclear weapons, then this will be done in a situation where the bill will go for hours or tens of minutes.
    Or is the idea of ​​the Poles to drag the American contingent from Germany to its territory? Including Air Force bases from Ramstein and Spangdahlem request
  30. Old26 5 May 2020 22: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Avior
    yes, I agree.
    Only, perhaps, they will need to be equipped, but this is an unprincipled issue.
    From the technical side there are no obstacles in this matter, it all depends on a political decision

    Most likely some additional equipment will be made, because I don’t think that cars are delivered to the former VD countries that are ready right away to carry nuclear weapons without modifications. Although I have to say that Poland has fairly new cars - F-16C Block 52
  31. Karaul20 6 May 2020 05: 03 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    If it also places short-range ballistic missiles there, then the Americans will have the opportunity to strike Moscow in 3 minutes, it is clear that this will not happen, but from such a position it is much easier to talk.