Both Vityaz and Prometheus: BAZ wheeled chassis for Russian air defense systems


Since April, the newest S-350 Vityaz air defense systems began to enter the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. One of the innovations for air defense systems is the use of chassis from Bryansk manufacturers. We are talking about an automotive platform created at the Bryansk Automobile Plant (BAZ). This is an enterprise that five years ago received an additional impetus for development, becoming a part of the Almaz-Antey concern.


For many years, the Bryansk Automobile Plant has been specializing in the creation of special wheeled chassis and tractors with a lifting capacity of up to 40 tons. If earlier BAZ’s products were mainly intended to meet the needs of the oil and gas industry, now it is turning into the basis for the latest and most promising missile systems.

Having decided to reduce its dependence on Belarusian manufacturers in the defense industry, the automobile chassis for air defense systems was chosen based on several key parameters.

The first of them is high traffic. Obviously, the wheeled chassis should ensure the movement of equipment even on those roads (or the term “directions” is better to use here), which can literally "put into a puddle" almost any other wheeled vehicle. Bryansk motorists provide axial load on all types of their special equipment no more than 10-12 tons. This is the key to the fact that the chassis can be used on all types of roads, up to a fairly blurred "primer".



But the blurry “primer” is far from the only option of bad roads, where the BAZ can pass without any problems. Equipment with a load in the form of launchers of air defense systems or radar systems can be operated in desert areas and even the tundra.

And while participating in the International Army Games, the Bryansk BAZ carried out movement at incredible heights - over 4 km above sea level - in the mountains of the Caucasus.

The second important parameter is the proper load capacity.

One of the used auto platforms is the BAZ-69095 with a 6x6.1 wheel arrangement. This is how the manufacturer of the equipment defines it. This is a platform with an axle load of 11,5 tons. The machine is equipped with a 400 hp engine. and a mechanical 3-way dual-band gearbox YaMZ-2393-20. The total number of gears is 10 (1 rear). The BAZ-69095 suspension is an independent 2-torsion suspension with shock absorbers on each of the wheels. The capacity of the tanks is 625 liters. The gauge on the outer edges of the wheels is 2750 mm. The total height (excluding the open side hatch (hood) of engine maintenance) is 3080 mm.



For the S-350 Vityaz air defense system, another wheel formula is used. The Bryansk Automobile Plant offers several 8x8 wheel configurations, including the BAZ-69098. In a civilian modification, this chassis is defined as a crane with a mass of mounted equipment of about 20,5 tons. The axle load corresponds to the BAZ-69095 version - 11,5 tons.



The speed in the column of the S-350 Vityaz complex is up to 60 km / h. Speed ​​is another parameter that was paid attention to when choosing a platform.

Another variant of special equipment with an 8x8 wheel formula is BAZ-690902. In this case, the mass of mounted attachments is already 26,8 tons with a total weight of about 44 tons.



It is important to note that the promising Russian anti-aircraft missile systems S-500 "Prometheus", according to the latest information, will also be installed on Bryansk wheeled chassis. These systems, which can also be attributed to the Russian missile defense shield, are planned for serial deliveries to the Armed Forces for the current year. It was previously noted that deliveries could begin in the second half of 2020.
Author:
Photos used:
website of the Bryansk Automobile Plant
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pvi1206 4 May 2020 18: 48 New
    • 17
    • 1
    +16
    The right news ...
    1. svp67 4 May 2020 18: 54 New
      • 16
      • 3
      +13
      Quote: Pvi1206
      The right news ...

      Alas, life shows that in the case of the release of vital equipment for the army, production should be its own ... and on its territory.
      1. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 19: 31 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Alas, life shows that in the case of the release of vital equipment for the army, production should be its own ... and on its territory.

        Why don't we do it? soldier
      2. Uncle Izya 4 May 2020 20: 57 New
        • 2
        • 7
        -5
        So at the BASE components with the MZKT the same frame and its own should be no worse than import
      3. Serg koma 5 May 2020 04: 45 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: svp67
        production should be your ... and on its territory.

        Bryansk is still under the Lithuanians ??? belay "In 1356, the Lithuanian prince Olgerd annexed Bryansk to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania." laughing
      4. Most kind 6 May 2020 14: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And how now the father will live, he will buy his tractor, if there is a BAZ, and indeed you can introduce a thread and Brlorussian tractors
    2. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 21: 26 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Good article good
  2. kjhg 4 May 2020 18: 52 New
    • 19
    • 8
    +11
    Alexey, I would like to see an article comparing BAZ and MZKT machines of the same class. Moreover, the comparison is comprehensive, ranging from technical specifications, reliability and ending with the price and cost of operation.
    I am glad that in this class we have a domestic alternative to Minsk tractors. But in the segment of heavier tractors (16 * 16), used for mobile strategic missiles, the work on which was entrusted to KAMAZ, recently there is no news at all.
    1. avg
      avg 4 May 2020 19: 15 New
      • 26
      • 4
      +22
      There’s nothing to compare, only your own. Especially after all the bows of Luke. Just boorish: "Not crazy, not enough money," which is worth it. And this despite the fact that BAZ and KAMAZ for a long time, quite artificially, by agreement, were moved away from such topics. Belarus generally tries not to let us into its market, but it requires full openness and preferences from us.
      1. kjhg 4 May 2020 19: 33 New
        • 4
        • 7
        -3
        Quote: avg
        There’s nothing to compare, only your own.

        I didn’t mean refusing to buy my cars if they turned out to be worse in comparison with Minsk. Undoubtedly, priority should be given to domestic machines and to develop this segment of mechanical engineering. However, it is still interesting to compare with existing foreign counterparts. But Russia cannot completely abandon Minsk tractors. The Platform project, according to which KAMAZ was supposed to develop heavy multi-purpose vehicles: 16x16 with a loading platform and a lifting capacity of 85 tons, 12x12 by 50 tons and a four-axle all-wheel drive tractor with the ability to tow a trailer weighing 90-160 tons, seems to have failed. Too revolutionary was the idea when an electric transmission was supposed to transmit current to electric motors, which are separate for each wheel.
        1. Alexga 4 May 2020 19: 53 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Once upon a time, a sample of MAZ-7907 was created at MAZ. He was finally ready in 1985. The I platform was created almost similarly to that old MAZ. With all the problems of 1985. Because of these problems, no one needed the car ..
          1. Alexga 4 May 2020 20: 58 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            Guilty, Platform Oh, old became, vision is no longer that.
        2. avg
          avg 4 May 2020 20: 52 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          The Platform project ... seems to have failed.

          "Platform-O" for "Topol" and "Yars" adopted. (Made with us https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/117868/)
          It may be necessary to eliminate "childhood diseases", perhaps "not children's", but this needs to be done. Lukashenko has no faith.
          1. Piramidon 5 May 2020 21: 40 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: avg
            It may be necessary to eliminate "childhood diseases"

            They wrote that according to the test results of Platform-0, the main problem is the protection of electric wheel motors from water, dust, dirt ... But that was three years ago. It is possible that the problem has now been resolved.
    2. Alekseev 4 May 2020 21: 03 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Quote: kjhg
      comprehensive comparison, ranging from technical specifications, reliability

      BAZ is not at all new to creating a chassis for weapons. Hurricane, OCA, Point, etc.
      On the chassis of the BAZ, you can mount and SPAR type Shell. Why did they choose KamAZ, a cross-country vehicle instead of a specialized off-road chassis is unknown.
      Perhaps, just all the BASES go for the Almaz-Antey air defense system.
      If we compare it with the same 8 * 8 with the BAS with the MZKT, it turns out that they are very similar in terms of performance characteristics, only the MZKT is somewhat larger. At least in the range of up to 40 tons of carrying capacity, MZKT products with BASES can and should be replaced.
      And from above, this is Platform-O, there are statements, including Shoigu, that heavy tractors with electric transmissions have been adopted.
      1. wlkw 4 May 2020 23: 26 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        "And from above, this is Platform-O, there are statements, including Shoigu, that heavy tractors with electric transmissions have been adopted."
        Are they really released? It’s just that it happened with us that some kind of armament is being tested, everything’s OK, it’s officially adopted and that’s all ..... those. as it were accepted, but not ordered, or is there somewhere a couple of three pieces, and okay. The classic case is the KA-50 helicopter,
        1. Alekseev 5 May 2020 10: 31 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: wlkw
          Are they really released?

          How much, where, for what types of weapons and from which components? wink
          Well, not everything in the field of the production of arms and military equipment should be reported and discussed to please our patriotic hearts. Themes of their quantity and quality are generally closed. They give for the vigor of citizens "leaks in the part concerning", and not always accurate, for vigor and all.
      2. Bad_gr 5 May 2020 14: 51 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Alekseev
        Why did they choose KamAZ, a cross-country vehicle instead of a specialized off-road chassis is unknown.

        Why not know? Serdyukov was the Minister of Defense and on the board of directors of KAMAZ at the same time, so there was a bias in the procurement of military equipment from KAMAZ.
        And if they allocated BAZ to money for Platform-O, I think they would have been spent more rationally, since such platforms are their profile, not KAMAZ.
    3. Grits 5 May 2020 15: 52 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: kjhg
      But in the segment of heavier tractors (16 * 16), used for mobile strategic missiles, the work on which were entrusted to KAMAZ, recently there is no news at all.

      But the Kurgan plant was safely buried.
      1. Piramidon 5 May 2020 21: 57 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Gritsa
        But the Kurgan plant was safely buried

        And what store in his workshops was wiped off. To fear all adversaries.
        1. Grits 6 May 2020 14: 08 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Piramidon
          And what store in his workshops was wiped off. To fear all adversaries.

          Very similar to the Green Island store in Vladivostok. Which stands on the site of the former workshops of the once powerful RadioPribor plant. On which I once worked, producing products for the Navy. From the principle now I do not go to this store ...
    4. Most kind 6 May 2020 14: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Our BAZ is better than the MZKT, since it is ours, and the MZKT is not ours, and if Russians with a quality mark play multi-vector, now only at their own expense, they still need to give them money, so ours is definitely better, and if it’s even crazy to bring, then he won’t have prices, by the way in the USSR they trained separately for BAZ and MZKT, in the presence of vodok on the MZKT you can’t sit on BAZ
  3. V.I.P. 4 May 2020 19: 01 New
    • 2
    • 10
    -8
    They would also put the Beech on a three-axle chassis. MZKT does this. Many countries choose wheeled chassis rather than tracked
    1. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 21: 19 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      What for? Do you need a beech on wheels request
      1. Bad_gr 5 May 2020 14: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: tanki-tanki
        What for? Do you need a beech on wheels request

      2. Grits 5 May 2020 15: 57 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: tanki-tanki
        What for? Do you need a beech on wheels

        It is needed both on the harp and on the wheels. Each has its own niche. In addition, Belarusians have an excellent wheeled platform for Buk, Tori and Carapace.
  4. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 19: 12 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And diesel on all options alone costs? 400hp? Tutaevsky? And they did not write about the 10x10 version.
    1. dvina71 4 May 2020 19: 42 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Tutaevsky?

      Yes TMZ. They have an engine 8463.10 500ls. 2200 N.m .. for 50t of the total mass .. for the eyes. This is at the level of modern diesel engines for vehicles.
      Volvo d13 from 500 to 550l.s to 2600N.m
      10x10 was given to KAMAZ.

      There is also KAMAZ 7360 ..
      1. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 19: 59 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        There are more diesel tractors. And 10x10 was shown on some military equipment. At KAMAZ, the frame is weaker and higher. And suspension with bridges. For add-ons worse.
        1. dvina71 4 May 2020 20: 04 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Zaurbek
          There are more diesel tractors

          No. This is exactly the car. Although technically they are no different. Only fuel equipment and program in the control module.
          10x10 are five bridges. The frame is designed for a certain load so it is weaker stronger ... it is not clear what you mean.
          1. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 20: 42 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            And the walls of the block should be thicker and the motor resource higher.
            1. dvina71 4 May 2020 21: 07 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: Zaurbek
              And the walls of the block should be thicker and higher service life

              Strange, but I have a d10 volvo on my car. 6 cylinders, 10 liters, 320l.s, 1450 N.M. At the same time, it is lighter than Tutaevsky eight, and even the liners and blocks are noticeably thinner. Cranks are lighter and less bulky. At the same time, this motor has a millionth resource in road trains with a gross weight of 45 tons.
              I kind of gave the crankshaft to the groove from another TD102F .. When the turner found out where the shaft was, he began to persuade me in every possible way to dump me from the workshop along with the shaft. But on the root necks the wear was visible with the eye of their turner and pierced .. several times the right circle. The indigenous ones turned out to be in the nominal ..- 1 micron .. The reason is simple .. the volvo shafts are made of ductile steel and I practically don’t know the cases of their destruction, but the rubbing surfaces of cementing .. The same approach to other details. So that manufacturability is an alternative to mass building.
              In fairness .. earlier k.shafts on diesel were processed by TVh, which is very close to cementation ... but it was a long time ago, during the USSR
              Now we’ll bother with such garbage .. otherwise the price of the ancient Yaroslavl eight will be like that of a new imported one .. the main competitive advantage will be lost.
              1. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 21: 29 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I am not an expert. I read that KamAZ made its new diesel engine with the help of Liebher and took them as a basis for special equipment and made it easier ...
                1. dvina71 4 May 2020 21: 43 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Apparently you mixed up the words adapted and facilitated. The maximum than constructively they can differ is the camshaft. On transport diesels, a large operating range .. for voluminous engines is 1000-1500 revolutions. For special equipment, for example with an electric drive, such a range is not required. It is possible to reduce the degree of forcing and achieved an increased k.m in a slightly narrower range. Next, through the gearbox we set the generator in motion, changing gear ratios, at the same speeds we get more or less current. For tractors ... with a mechanical drive, basically the same thing, that's why there are such complex and multi-stage transmissions. That is, from a stationary diesel transport it is necessary to expand the timing of the timing, increasing the operating range, reflash the control module and change the injection parameters, increasing the feed limit. Yes .. else rotating parts should be lightened whenever possible, reducing parasitic phenomena at high speeds. Perhaps this is a relief .., but even this is not a lot in kg, and the engine weighs about 600-800 .. kg. Against this background .. the loss of a dozen pounds ... well, that ...
                  1. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 22: 29 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    The new KAMAZ engine will be built on the basis of a 12-liter Liebherr D946 diesel engine, which has been on the conveyor for only two years and is used only on construction equipment, but not on cars. And one of the main components of the adaptation of these engines to Chelny trucks is the reduction in weight and size.
                  2. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 22: 34 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    In general, the rigidity of the unit was given special attention: the Liebherr D946 diesel engine was heavy - it was used for the most part in construction equipment and as a stationary unit, so it had to reduce weight. Of course, rigidity should not suffer from this.
                    1. dvina71 6 May 2020 00: 02 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Zaurbek
                      The new KAMAZ engine will be built on the basis of a 12-liter Liebherr D946 diesel engine

                      That's exactly what it is based on .. Liebher's motor weighs 1300kg. Kamazovsky P6 800kg ..
                      This alone indicates that the KAMAZ engine has little in common with the libher.
                      Most likely, the piston proportions and phases are taken .. the rest is completely there ..
  5. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 19: 16 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Previously, BAZ products were mainly intended to meet the needs of the oil and gas industry, but now they are turning into the basis for the latest and most promising missile systems.

    First, a little, then a lot laughing
    1. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 21: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      True, not everyone succeeds. Some are falling soon.
  6. Alexey RA 4 May 2020 19: 32 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    This is an enterprise that five years ago received an additional impetus for development, becoming part of the Almaz-Antey concern.
    For many years, the Bryansk Automobile Plant has been specializing in the creation of special wheeled chassis and tractors with a lifting capacity of up to 40 tons. If earlier BAZ’s products were mainly intended to meet the needs of the oil and gas industry, now it is turning into the basis for the latest and most promising missile systems.

    In fact, at the time of arrival at the Almaz-Antey plant, BAZ products were no longer intended for anyone - the plant was actually bankrupt. And if it weren’t for “AA”, then the plant would have become them legally - you can’t argue against power engineers and the bank.
    The Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region postponed until January 26, 2016 the consideration of the application of Slavia Bank on declaring bankrupt JSC Bryansk Automobile Plant bankrupt, the court said.
    The reason for postponing the consideration of the application is not indicated. The applicant asks the court to include in the register of claims of creditors of the debtor a debt to him in the amount of 3,6 million rubles and 2,6 million euros.
    The press service of the branch "Bryanskenergosbyt" LLC "TEK-Energo" on November 30 said that the company has achieved through the court the introduction of self-limitation of electricity for the Bryansk Automobile Plant. "In connection with the plant’s debt for electricity consumed in the amount of more than 30 million rubles (for five months), on November 24, the Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region satisfied the claim of TEK-Energo LLC and ordered the company to independently restrict the regime of electricity consumption," the statement said.
    1. dvina71 4 May 2020 19: 52 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Avod was actually bankrupt

      I was at this plant somewhere in 2006. There was no car production there. workshops were leased. In one of them I took fire extinguishers for our tank farm .. they were refueled there, pressure tested and so on.
    2. Zaurbek 4 May 2020 20: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      As with KZKT happened
  7. knn54 4 May 2020 19: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "Import substitution," however.
  8. rocket757 4 May 2020 19: 50 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Ha, ha, whoever be sure to "wrap up" that we had and will not be expensive !!! Because such "all-terrain vehicles" are made soldier
    The military acceptance showed tests of various off-road vehicles in the Astrakhan steppes ..... BAZ passed all the tests with such high quality.
    1. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 20: 00 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Ha, ha, whoever be sure to "wrap up" that we had and will not be expensive !!! Because such "all-terrain vehicles" are made

      Yes, the roads are good wassat

      This is nothing! wassat
      1. dvina71 4 May 2020 20: 12 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: tanki-tanki
        It's nothing else

        Do you still have to put asphalt here?
        1. tanki-tanki 4 May 2020 20: 47 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Do you still have to put asphalt here?

          It could be. wassat
          1. dvina71 4 May 2020 20: 53 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Quote: tanki-tanki
            It could be.

            In spring, many roads were opened. Winter was mild, reagents used little. Less than usual ... before, I poured a minimum of 5 liters of non-freezing water only to Moscow. 1200 km. this winter already took one trip .. that is, for five or six days. As a result, water flowed into the cracks in the asphalt, and in the absence of reagents it began to freeze .. and that's it ... in the spring a hole.
            The question is how quickly they take up the repair. We have already ... as soon as the asphalt dried up, the milling cutters left and peeled off the top layer.
        2. Piramidon 5 May 2020 23: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: dvina71
          Quote: tanki-tanki
          It's nothing else

          Do you still have to put asphalt here?

      2. Bad_gr 5 May 2020 19: 16 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: tanki-tanki
        Yes, the roads are good


    2. sabakina 4 May 2020 20: 15 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      Quote: rocket757
      Ha, ha, whoever be sure to "wrap up" that we had and will not be expensive !!! Because such "all-terrain vehicles" are made soldier
      The military acceptance showed tests of various off-road vehicles in the Astrakhan steppes ..... BAZ passed all the tests with such high quality.

      There are two troubles in Russia. We coped with the roads. What to do in the second? recourse
      1. rocket757 4 May 2020 20: 54 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        We have a suitable climate! For roads not ah, but for fools just right!
        There are some "inconveniences" in both, but sometimes it helps.
      2. PilotS37 5 May 2020 07: 41 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: sabakina
        There are two troubles in Russia. We coped with the roads. What to do in the second?

        Звать Макаревича! [media=https://yandex.ru/video/preview/?filmId=10263828342583139184&text=битва%20с%20дураками%20машина%20времени&path=wizard&parent-reqid=1588653561794961-1827970742315312713900291-production-app-host-man-web-yp-169&redircnt=1588653569.1] wassat
    3. Piramidon 5 May 2020 23: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: rocket757
      Ha, ha, whoever be sure to "wrap up" that we had and will not be expensive !!! Because such "all-terrain vehicles" are made

      According to legend, when the Japanese first saw our 469th UAZ with wheel gears, they said, "These Russians will not come up with anything just to build good roads." laughing
      1. dvina71 5 May 2020 23: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Piramidon
        "These Russians can’t come up with anything just to build good roads."

        Let's copy the Land Rovers yourself ...
      2. rocket757 6 May 2020 08: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        We have a lot of directions that will never become roads .... rather, we will learn to fly over them!
  9. Pavel57 4 May 2020 22: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    There was an excess of automobile factories in the USSR; not all were preserved. It is good that the BAZ has been preserved and in demand.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Serg koma 5 May 2020 05: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Pavel57
      IN USSR there was an excess of car factories,

      And each one had its own niche, without unification (the case with the Ural cabin) from 1,5 to 40 tons, and people were at work, and the design bureau specialized in the development of their own "class" ... But now the NH cars were not enough. In this case, in the case of the mobilization of production - not a little, there is where to deploy, there is something to reprofile and specialize.
  10. Ros 56 5 May 2020 06: 54 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    And this is all right, hell knows that he will wander into the stupidity of Luke the unpredictable. With this companion, one must keep an eye out. And his own, it is somehow calmer and more reliable.
    1. ver_ 5 May 2020 12: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      ..and not only - where your product is made - technology is not lost, but improved and developed ...
  11. Grievous 5 May 2020 09: 19 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Made by an ax.
    1. Ros 56 5 May 2020 13: 36 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Kizhi is also made with an ax, they must still be able to use.
  12. And Makarov 5 May 2020 14: 02 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    That's right, we must go to self-sufficiency.
  13. Diverter 5 May 2020 23: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    in the VKS, transfer all the equipment to the BAZ base. for unification.
  14. ZaharoFF 6 May 2020 14: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There would be more such news