US and British Navy conducted anti-submarine exercises near the Russian maritime borders in the Arctic

81

Materials appeared in the Western press that describe the activities of American submarines near the Russian maritime borders in the Arctic region. The reports say that the exercises beyond the Arctic Circle ended last Friday.

It is noted that the U.S. Navy, the British Navy, and P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft took part in the exercises. The waters of the maneuvers were chosen by the Norwegian Sea - in its northern latitudes. In fact, we are talking about the water area, which is adjacent to the Norwegian-Russian maritime border in the region of the Norwegian and Barents Seas.



At the same time, American sources do not hide the fact that the main purpose of the exercises was the discovery of Russian submarines of the North fleet.
In addition to the submarines of Britain and the USA, several surface warships were sent to the Arctic region for training "hunting" for submarines of the Russian Navy.

These are Arly Burke class destroyers - the Donald Cook and Porter of the US Navy, the USNS Supply service vessel, and the British frigate F78 HMS Kent.



Press Service 6 US Fleet:

For more than 70 years, the 6th Fleet has operated throughout the region in support of maritime security and stability. Our regional alliances remain strong thanks to our regular operations and exercises with our partners' naval forces, and we welcome this opportunity to work together at sea, while improving our understanding of Arctic operations. Together with our British colleagues, we conducted important exercises against the main threats in the Arctic region.

Apparently, Russian submarines are considered the “main threat” in Washington and London in this region.
  • Facebook / ussporter.ddg78
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    3 May 2020 13: 38
    These are Arly Burke class destroyers - Donald Cook and Porter, US Navy
    Well, for what "sins" they were driven from the Black Sea voyages to the north? Or do the Americans have the same problem with a serviceable surface structure?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      3 May 2020 13: 56
      No, they just calculated the specific workload of cash carriers with "Caliber" with an increased range and realized that it is safer for them to flop in the northern latitudes than on the BV, where the Russians are unfriendly and the Persians are very unhappy - and then go and find out who pressed the button .. ...
      But then we might think that for every Porter there may be an iceberg of its own.
      1. +3
        3 May 2020 14: 11
        These are Arly Burke class destroyers - Donald Cook

        Our favorite. Where is it without him? Where is the Su-24M? Donald Cook, and without the Su-24M. Not order.
        it’s safer to flop in the northern latitudes than in the BV

        Yeah, it’s especially safe near the main base of the Northern Fleet with many submarines, including Antey class 949A (24 anti-ship missiles Granite each) and Schuka-B 971 (torpedo submarine to destroy submarines).
        1. 0
          3 May 2020 14: 22
          Fuh, how inhospitable you are!
          Or maybe the suicidal moods of Amers leaped when they realized that the Persians and their katerishki were not going to a picnic at all, and to put some Burke to the bottom did not cost them anything - that’s where they were relocated.
          It’s they who test us for lice: how many boats we will put forward to meet them and how many of them they can identify. It’s bad that at this time of the year the heat trail is clearly visible ... Maybe it will slow down?
          1. -1
            3 May 2020 14: 32
            the Persians and their katerishki are not going to a picnic in the bays at all, and to put some Burke to the bottom does not cost them anything - that’s where they relocated.

            It’s incorrect to compare the capabilities of the Northern Fleet and the Persians, with all due respect to the latter. The Persians have only 3 old Varshavyanks and their little submarines, even though they recently officially announced the beginning of the creation of their MAPL. Can China help them? request
            In addition, there is a Tu-22M3 with an X-32. Again, tests of the Zircon anti-ship missiles are underway. Anything can happen. Let us accidentally deviate from the course of the long-suffering Donald Cook. Again, anything happens. feel
            1. 0
              3 May 2020 16: 59
              Nothing, they are suitable for flood cabotage and Varshavyanka, and Cook and Varshavyanka can with pleasure drown and even stop all oil export from Arabia and the Emirates (like LNG from Qatar).
              So the bug is small, but smelly! laughing
              But to dishevele this gang at high latitudes is generally a matter of 5 minutes from strength (yes it will burn for half an hour) - all business is something: and why do they climb into OUR seas? laughing
              1. 0
                3 May 2020 19: 43
                Yes, with such a BC, Varshavyanka and NATO can win everything wassat Ammunition - 18 torpedoes
          2. +2
            3 May 2020 17: 21
            Quote: hydrox
            Fuh, how inhospitable you are!

            But why? Most likely, a "group of comrades" for a "hospitable" meeting, I think, is on the way ...
            1. +1
              3 May 2020 17: 25
              Well, now I’m calm, and I’ve even panicked: what are these - the holidays are over, but there’s no fight, no! laughing
        2. -3
          3 May 2020 20: 11
          Where are your Su-24Ms? -They didn’t take off. (Humor transmission)
    3. -2
      3 May 2020 18: 53
      Cook last time in the Baltic Sea they drowned and drowned the Su24mi, and he surfaced in the North, and it seemed like a tailor in the Black Sea, he quickly got to the North.
  2. +1
    3 May 2020 13: 40
    They want to revive the Nazi "Wolf Packs".
    1. -1
      3 May 2020 13: 44
      US and British Navy conducted anti-submarine exercises near the Russian maritime borders in the Arctic
      uhosh! it's something incredible!
    2. 0
      3 May 2020 14: 01
      Who knows: :: our submarines in the North have much more opportunities to show their wolf fangs and at the same time be sure that they won’t be anything for it.
      After all, in the North, we are at home - and for uninvited guests - cuffs and bumps!
      1. -3
        3 May 2020 19: 03
        Northern latitude is a large apartment building. Yours is yours, no one takes it for you, but others, it’s others, with all the consequences, but not the whole north, the northern latitudes - at your place.
  3. +1
    3 May 2020 13: 41
    These are Arly Burke class destroyers - Donald Cook and Porter, US Navy,

    Interestingly, are there any other ships in the US Navy besides "Cook" that can sail? Or they are afraid to release them into the sea "lest they drown themselves"
    1. -1
      3 May 2020 17: 11
      In vain are you on them like this :: quite a hard worker-ships, that's just the Aegis, installed on them, is outdated a long time ago and is not accustomed to working in the "big date" mode, their ship locators are also old (go, our aircraft continue to take ( especially with the Premier)).
      In short, the Americans get lost, do not value their sailors - well, how does someone from our hands comb the button to press - are we at home !?
      1. -1
        3 May 2020 17: 31
        You shouldn’t be at them like that: it’s quite hard working boat,

        According to Vicki, there were 67 built Berkov. And only Cook floats on our borders and shines in the media. So I asked the "experts" about the other 66
      2. 0
        3 May 2020 19: 01
        November 6, 2014: simultaneous interception of two cruise missiles and one ballistic missile over the Pacific Ocean. Shooting was fired from a USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53) Arly Burke missile destroyer in the Hawaiian Islands [7]. Yes, such a bullshit that Aigis aircraft radars are 10 times smaller in size than the radars the size of a house laughing
        1. 0
          3 May 2020 19: 15
          Shooting was fired from a USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53) Arly Burke missile destroyer in the Hawaiian Islands [7]. Yes, this bullshit Aegis-What Aircraft Radars 10 times smaller

          Sorry dear! I don’t understand from you: the destroyer began to put Aegis radar on airplanes, or vice versa, did the Berks fly?
          Or you wrote your comment: "Yes, so, for a conversation."
          1. 0
            3 May 2020 19: 26
            hydrox (hydrox) Today, 17:11
            In vain are you on them like this :: quite a hard worker-ships, that's just Aegis, installed on them, is outdated a long time ago and is not accustomed to working in the "big date" mode, their ship locators are also old (go, our aircraft take further ( even more so with the Prime Minister)) .- That's what I answered.
          2. -2
            3 May 2020 19: 47
            Amateur (Victor) - figured out whether or not I answered. And there’s nothing to apologize for
    2. -1
      3 May 2020 19: 06
      in the meantime, only 62 is ready for 2012 wassat
  4. 0
    3 May 2020 13: 44
    Apparently, Russian submarines are considered the “main threat” in Washington and London in this region.
    Duc apparently others in this region and no laughing laughing
  5. -8
    3 May 2020 13: 47
    Russia was surrounded by "tentacles" from all "fronts". And this can not be understood unless an amateur (in any question). And when we (patriots) from the last "forces" are trying to defend the "merits" of the country on the fronts (information war), the thought involuntarily comes to me - am I in the ranks on those "barricades" !? (offensively).
    1. 0
      3 May 2020 13: 57
      Quote: primaala
      Russia was surrounded by "tentacles" from all "fronts". And this can not be understood unless an amateur (in any question). And when we (patriots) from the last "forces" are trying to defend the "merits" of the country on the fronts (information war), the thought involuntarily comes to me - am I in the ranks on those "barricades" !? (offensively).

      And you try, Alla!
      1. -2
        3 May 2020 13: 59
        I’ll throw you a million videos, where the tears begin to pour in a stream. Will this change the fact of what is happening today?
        1. 0
          3 May 2020 14: 09
          Not for me. And for you? No need to trick me! Even Roman Skomorokhov failed to do this!
          P.S. Roma, with all due respect, I respect you!
          1. 0
            3 May 2020 14: 50
            Not for me. And for you?
            ===============
            It is IMPORTANT for me what situation Russia is in today. And when the truthful arguments of what is happening in the country are removed from the air, the question involuntarily arises: WHO did not like the version about the actions of "history" in the center of St. Petersburg EBN !? and WHO is covering up Gref's actions !? Or the Savings Bank of the Russian Federation went for a walk, on the country's economy ???
            1. 0
              3 May 2020 14: 57
              Quote: primaala
              Not for me. And for you?
              ===============
              It is IMPORTANT for me what situation Russia is in today. And when the truthful arguments of what is happening in the country are removed from the air, the question involuntarily arises: WHO did not like the version about the actions of "history" in the center of St. Petersburg EBN !? and WHO is covering up Gref's actions !? Or the Savings Bank of the Russian Federation went for a walk, on the country's economy ???

              Forget everything.
        2. -1
          3 May 2020 14: 45
          Quote: primaala
          I’ll throw you a million videos, where the tears begin to pour in a stream. Will this change the fact of what is happening today?

          Link to the online broadcast from the Verkhovna Rada discard something? crying Don't. Pity me.
          1. -1
            3 May 2020 20: 02
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            Quote: primaala
            I’ll throw you a million videos, where the tears begin to pour in a stream. Will this change the fact of what is happening today?

            Link to the online broadcast from the Verkhovna Rada discard something? crying Don't. Pity me.

            It’s strange. Such a read. Have you pierced my ah \ scribe? hmm ... like living in Russia.
            Skin ... read ...
            Woke up at night.
            You breathed so evenly.
            A cat dozing at the feet
            In the kitchen is a mouse.
            Curled up, the baby was sleeping ...
            And it became so painfully calm
            That I wanted to shout with happiness: “Kysh!”
            Go into the kitchen, hide in a mouse hole
            Sit quietly, after a call ....
            But happiness laughed:
            “I will not leave.
            I'm here. You sleep.
            And I will watch. ”(C)
            1. 0
              3 May 2020 20: 46
              It’s strange. Such a read. Have you pierced my ah \ scribe? hmm ... like living in Russia.
              Skin ... read ...

              belay ?? !! I have nothing more to do. requestWhy should I punch someone's scribe?
    2. 0
      3 May 2020 14: 44
      Quote: primaala
      Russia was surrounded by "tentacles" from all "fronts". And this can not be understood unless an amateur (in any question). And when we (patriots) from the last "forces" are trying to defend the "merits" of the country on the fronts (information war), the thought involuntarily comes to me - am I in the ranks on those "barricades" !? (offensively).

      Surround on. Good luck with this difficult task.
      SIPRI data by country:

      Russia - 7 thousand warheads (including 1,95 thousand deployed *, 2,35 thousand are in storage and can be used after preparation, including transportation and installation on carriers, and 2,7 thousand are removed from service and awaiting disposal);
      USA - 6,8 thousand nuclear warheads (1,8 thousand, 2,2 thousand and 2,8 thousand, respectively);
      Great Britain - 215 (120 and 95; has no withdrawn warheads);
      France - 300 (280, 10 and 10);
      China - 270 ** (SIPRI indicates "everything is in storage", but in reality the number of warheads on deployed carriers of the PRC is unknown);
      India - 120–130 (all in storage);
      Pakistan - 130–140 (all in storage);
      Israel - 80 (all in storage);
      DPRK - 10–20 (estimated data, since there are no open sources confirming that the country produced or deployed such a number of warheads).

      https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1809164
      1. 0
        3 May 2020 17: 15
        And now - in reality: wink smile
        At the end of September 2010, the Pentagon possessed approximately 5113 warheads, both already placed on carriers and in active reserve and storage (this did not include several hundred charges removed from armament and awaiting disposal)
        1. 0
          3 May 2020 17: 19
          Why not? I have in the quote data for 2017, and you have for 2010. What is the contradiction?
          1. +1
            3 May 2020 17: 27
            Those. - For 7 years, the vigorous US ammunition has decreased almost threefold? Well, well - it’s not bad to dream ...
            1. 0
              3 May 2020 17: 49
              What do you think? US - 6,8 thousand nuclear warheads (1,8 thousand deployed, 2,2 thousand are in storage and after preparation can be used and 2,8 thousand are withdrawn from service and are awaiting disposal, respectively ) .Total 6,8 thousand nuclear warheads. For 2017.
              Your quote.
              Quote: Sniper Amateur
              And now - in reality: wink smile
              At the end of September 2010, the Pentagon possessed approximately 5113 warheads, both already placed on carriers and in active reserve and storage (this did not include several hundred charges removed from armament and awaiting disposal)

              That is, in 2017 they have 1,8 thousand deployed, 2,2 thousand are in storage and can be used after preparation (1,8 thousand + 2,2 thousand = 4 thousand), and based on your data for 2010 5133 warheads deployed and stored. And where is your words
              Those. - For 7 years, the vigorous US ammunition has decreased almost threefold?
              ?
              1. -1
                3 May 2020 18: 09
                Well, OK, explain to me the village-dense (I'm really from the village smile), - like the US Armed Forces - can now be armed with only 1800 A-heads ?.
                1. +1
                  3 May 2020 18: 18
                  And what bothers you about this 2017 figure? According to START-3, the parties (Russia and the USA) generally agreed to reduce the number of warheads to 1550 each. According to 2017 figures, Russia has deployed 1,95 thousand. and 2,35 thousand in storage, the United States deployed 1,8 thousand and 2,2 thousand in storage. The closest pursuers for comparison. Great Britain - 120 units deployed and 95 units in storage.
                  France - 280 units deployed and, 10 units in storage.
                  1. 0
                    3 May 2020 20: 03
                    Three positions "confuse" me:
                    1. That for some reason you do not take into account nuclear warheads of "return potential";
                    2. That you "forgot" tactical nuclear weapons;
                    3. What have you "lost" YABP for the US Navy.
                    1. 0
                      3 May 2020 20: 40
                      1. That for some reason you do not take into account nuclear warheads of "return potential";

                      These are the ones that are stored. The numbers on them I quoted. They do not count on all sides.
                      That you "lost" YABP for the US Navy.

                      I haven’t lost them. They are included in the total number of deployed nuclear warheads. These are nuclear warheads on SLB Trident 2 D 5. They are taken into account in the numbers I have quoted.
                      2. That you "forgot" tactical nuclear weapons;

                      Russia has an advantage here. I didn’t think so. I just gave the accounting data.
                      1. -1
                        3 May 2020 21: 22
                        That you "lost" YABP for the US Navy.
                        I haven’t lost them. They are included in the total number of deployed nuclear warheads. These are nuclear warheads on SLB Trident 2 D 5. They are taken into account in the numbers I have quoted.

                        The ballistic missile submarines are far from exhausting the nuclear arsenal of the US Navy. nuclear warheads for naval missiles, nuclear aerial bombs for decks, nuclear warheads for missiles, nuclear torpedoes, aviation YAG and YAG - warhead for PLUR.
                        2. That you "forgot" tactical nuclear weapons;

                        Russia has an advantage here. I didn’t think so. Just cited accounting data.

                        What kind "accounting"? belay Accounting category: "shriben pitchfork by wasser"? Has anyone in the world discovered data on their arsenals of tactical nuclear weapons?
              2. 0
                3 May 2020 19: 14
                and count how much they have hidden around the world?
            2. -1
              3 May 2020 19: 14
              himself fabulous then at a meeting (in Munich 2007 if memory serves) said that they hide under a pillow
  6. -6
    3 May 2020 14: 23
    "Donald Cook" as well as his team performed well on the Black Sea in 2014.
  7. 0
    3 May 2020 14: 28
    Thank you ... train
  8. -5
    3 May 2020 14: 37
    For more than 70 years, the 6th Fleet has operated throughout the region in support of maritime security and stability. Our regional alliances remain strong thanks to our regular operations and exercises with our partners' naval forces, and we welcome this opportunity to work together at sea, while improving our understanding of Arctic operations. Together with our British colleagues, we conducted important exercises against the main threats in the Arctic region.

    And this is exactly a quote, and not crossed out by the left heel, where is it known? bully
    Because the ZOO of the 6th operational fleet is Middle-earth and approaches to it from the side of the Big Atlantic ...
    1. +2
      5 May 2020 13: 40
      Quote: Sniper Amateur
      Because the ZOO of the 6th operational fleet is Middle-earth and approaches to it from the side of the Big Atlantic ...

      The whole joke is that despite the fact that the 2nd Fleet is responsible for the North Atlantic, the exercises were carried out at our borders by the 6th Fleet: USS Donald Cook (DDG 75), USS Porter (DDG 78), USS Roosevelt ( DDG 80), USNS Supply (T-AOE 6).
      Maybe the fact is that the 2nd Fleet was disbanded under Obama? And they formed it back only in the summer of 2018 (and formally it became combat ready only on December 31, 2019).
  9. -3
    3 May 2020 14: 39
    It’s curious - how many agribusiness companies on duty at sea? 1? 2? Or all the same 3? bully
    1. -3
      3 May 2020 15: 11
      I can tentatively say.
      Two SSBNs, in the base, but on duty. One is cooked in a factory.
      Multipurpose, too, two in the seas ... where I do not know ..
      In a month there will be three.
      I don’t know about "Batons", they are in another place .....
      Tact numbers to call?
      1. -5
        3 May 2020 15: 56
        Tact numbers to call?

        No, thanks. I am now a secretary in the public reception of a deputy of the City Council, and not a "mining" GUR MO. smile But in any case - these figures (ATP for them by the way!) Somehow do not inspire. Compared to US Navy at least.
        1. +2
          3 May 2020 17: 03
          No power steering.
          Just colleagues and students who do not agree with what Pleshak is doing with Russia.
          1. 0
            3 May 2020 17: 09
            No power steering.
            Just colleagues and students who do not agree with what Pleshak is doing with Russia.

            laughing love
      2. -2
        3 May 2020 18: 05
        Quote: Semenov Semen Semenych
        I can tentatively say.
        Two SSBNs, in the base, but on duty. One is cooked in a factory.
        Multipurpose, too, two in the seas ... where I do not know ..
        In a month there will be three.
        I don’t know about "Batons", they are in another place .....
        Tact numbers to call?


        They would write right away that you don’t know everything.
        At the moment, 13 SSBNs 3 Borea, 6 Dolphins, 3 Squid, 1 Shark. This is only for the nuclear triad, excluding MAPL. About 12 MAPL 971 Schuka-B and from 8 to 10 MAPL 949A Antey. In total, the Russian Navy 72 submarines both atomic and non-atomic. Data is available online.
        In 2014, at the time of commissioning of the first Borey class submarine carrier, there were ten submarine missile carriers as part of the Russian naval strategic nuclear forces. The Northern Fleet included six Project 667BDRM Dolphin submarine missile carriers and one Dmitriy Donskoy Project 941UM submarine cruiser (previously used for test launches of Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles). Three more submarine missile carriers of project 667BDR Kalmar were included in the Pacific Fleet. Project 667BDRM submarines, which are currently the most numerous type of Russian submarine missile carriers, are expected to continue their service until the early 2030s, gradually being replaced by the latest Boreas. It should be expected that by the beginning of the next decade it will be possible not only to completely replace Soviet-built submarine missile carriers, but also to increase their number, as well as the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and nuclear warheads on underwater carriers.


        Details: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2880010.html
        Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM.
        1. +1
          3 May 2020 18: 23
          I don’t know .... Wikipedia boy ...
          Coming? laughing
          1. -1
            3 May 2020 18: 58
            Quote: Semenov Semen Semenych
            I don’t know .... Wikipedia boy ...
            Coming? laughing


            Of course. Find 10 differences.
            The GRU is the Main Intelligence Directorate, reporting to the Russian Ministry of Defense.


            The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (GUR MOU) is the military intelligence body of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, which carries out intelligence functions in the military, military-political, military-technical, military-economic, informational and environmental spheres.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          3 May 2020 19: 17
          Maxim hats forgot to count
          1. +1
            3 May 2020 19: 33
            I mean? Missiles mean?
        3. 0
          3 May 2020 19: 31
          12 Pike-B, well
        4. 0
          6 May 2020 22: 58
          They would write right away that you don’t know everything.
          At the moment, 13 SSBNs 3 Borea, 6 Dolphins, 3 Squid, 1 Shark. This is only for the nuclear triad, excluding MAPL. About 12 MAPL 971 Schuka-B and from 8 to 10 MAPL 949A Antey. In total, the Russian Navy 72 submarines both atomic and non-atomic. Data is available online.

          Do you understand Odessa at all the difference между "payroll" и "on alert"? bully
  10. +1
    3 May 2020 15: 43
    Well, for what "sins" they were driven from the Black Sea voyages to the north?

    at the same time, tactical exercises of the SF took place. The usual routine of combat training.)
  11. +2
    3 May 2020 17: 22
    Where do you come from, "experts"? A wild mixture of idiocy with unfounded optimism (to put it mildly) just filled the field of comments. Tie already ...
    1. 0
      3 May 2020 17: 38
      Mikhail Vladimirovich, this is a circus.
      Well, personally for me, banned here about twenty times.
      Only recently wrote to you. Like Nicholas.
      Just neighing over idiots, this is a propaganda site and pluses and stupid titles, they just make me laugh like a real pk, like you.
      Well, have fun over the fool.

      1. +2
        3 May 2020 18: 42
        I learned about this project not so long ago, and I was hoping ... In vain ...
        1. 0
          3 May 2020 18: 58
          A little better on Courage. I also had a festival there, but the second account remained.
          In the Fleet section there is mine about RSL, APM, etc. Well, Klimov-Mina writes a lot there. With some criticism, fine.
      2. -1
        3 May 2020 19: 07
        Only recently wrote to you. Like Nicholas.
        Just neighing over idiots, this is a propaganda site and pluses and stupid titles, they just make me laugh like a real pk, like you.

        And therefore.
        it's a circus.
        Well, personally for me, banned here about twenty times.

        Did you dream of performing in a circus as a child, as I understand it? You were banned about twenty times from your words, but you never want to leave the circus?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            3 May 2020 19: 36
            A circus is Russia, trying to live contrary to world rules and even contrary to the laws, treaties and memorandums it has signed.

            Are you from Ukraine or something? Does Ukraine really live by the rules? Are they still crooks. Can the USA be a law-abiding country? It’s ridiculous to God.
            1. -1
              3 May 2020 19: 52
              They heard all the time, right up to the collapse of the USSR.
              On political information, in the press, on tv ....
              America is bad, just post on the hardware assembled in China on American brains, in Windows, written in the states .... BIOS, open, with what letters is everything written there? Really Russian? .....
              You answer for yourself and there is nothing to blame for the USA and Ukraine.
            2. 0
              3 May 2020 20: 02
              why then to prove how much BG in the United States, as if they were telling the truth
              1. 0
                3 May 2020 21: 01
                According to the contract must report mutually.
                But the video control system will cover like "Open Skies" ...
  12. 0
    3 May 2020 17: 45
    Faberge did not freeze themselves, boobies of the king of heaven?
    1. +2
      3 May 2020 17: 59
      Especially for the "fabergist".
      BEZ is Mikhail Vladimirovich. Release profile MPA. The last post of the headquarters of headquarters 310 anti-submarine regiment in Mongohto.
      I. Release Profile PLA. The last position is the anti-submarine warfare department of the Pacific Fleet headquarters. VUS 070200. Planning and control of the fleet.
      Who else is able to give an objective assessment of the nonsense that is posted on the site?
      1. 0
        4 May 2020 04: 41
        Quote: Semyonov Semyon Semyonich
        I. Release Profile PLA. The last position is the anti-submarine warfare department of the Pacific Fleet headquarters. VUS 070200. Planning and control of the fleet.
        winked interesting, but it would be logical to assume that this person took a military oath of allegiance to the USSR ?! wink and then he began to state that -
        Quote: Semyonov Semyon Semyonich
        The circus is Russia, trying to live contrary to world rules and even contrary to the laws itself,
        ... and summed up, -
        Quote: Semyonov Semyon Semyonich
        Worse murder in gradation of sins only an oath of crime.
        belay (!) ... well, as a loyal oath officer, apparently ?! ... stated a fact!
  13. 0
    3 May 2020 20: 04
    Vesti.RuVesti.Ru
    Pompeo announces evidence of Chinese origin of coronavirus
    My Moscow.online1: 140: 1615: 15
    40 photos 3 more videos
    The United States has enough evidence that the coronavirus COVID-19 was artificially created in a laboratory in Wuhan and from there began to spread around the world. Has such a statement been made by US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo-test tube shock?
  14. -3
    3 May 2020 20: 37
    It would seem unrelated news, but at the same time
    "The Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia has lost control over the drone due to a technical failure. We are talking about a drone measuring 3,5x5,5 m and weighing 26 kg," the agency said.

    The device moves at a speed of about 70 km / h, it should have enough fuel for about 90 hours of flight. The drone's altitude may exceed 200 m.

    The National Armed Forces of Latvia have already been involved in the search for the drone. The An-2 plane is participating at the bottom, and the day before the drone was looking for the Mi-17.

    According to the ministry, the control system of the drone was disabled for technical reasons the day before, on May 2 "
    The interception of the pespilot from the Latvians worked out ... Poseidon-8 coped with the task.
  15. -2
    3 May 2020 21: 01
    damn, already for the question someone put a minus, strange people.
  16. +1
    3 May 2020 21: 58
    Let’s provide security in the White Sea. There are friendly guys - like dirt. Meet ... spend ... The funeral service is a bonus.
  17. 0
    3 May 2020 22: 14
    Well, maybe it’s enough to bunch at our borders? You guys are democrats either there already, or vice versa .... I understand that it’s annoying, but this circus is already fed up ...... What are you hanging out with? What do you want? By the tinsel? So cross the border, business then !!!!
  18. -2
    3 May 2020 23: 24
    well there, drowned-no? Varshavyanki, SchukyB, Sushki-raised all the alarm?
  19. -2
    3 May 2020 23: 25
    Maxim how many apples are in readiness? laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"