MFA: Launching any ICBM from the US nuclear submarine in Russia will be regarded as a nuclear attack

Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, to which an appropriate response will immediately follow. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, speaking at a briefing, commented on a publication posted on the website of the US State Department about low-power nuclear charges and equipping them with ballistic missile submarines. According to her, “amateurs to speculate” about the flexibility of the American nuclear potential, it must be remembered that according to the Russian military doctrine, any ICBM launched towards Russia is the basis for a nuclear response.

Any attack using an American ballistic missile submarine (SLBM), regardless of the characteristics of its equipment, will be perceived as a nuclear attack weapons

- she said.

Earlier it was reported that the Pentagon leadership is promoting a program to equip ICBMs of American submarines with tactical nuclear warheads W76-2. According to the U.S. military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

Comments

[Errr]

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

Yeah, schaz!

[Grandfather]

Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, to which an appropriate response will immediately follow. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.

against the background of the fight against coronovirus, this is no longer scary ...

[Civil]

Yeah, we rally all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Civil

says emphatically no gang of overseas oligarchs.

She speaks, speaks and speaks, only no one except for here, no one hears, and there she expresses concern.
All this leads to terrible thoughts, but whose is it all the same dumb ?!

[venik]

Quote: Malyuta

She speaks, speaks and speaks, only no one except for here, no one hears, and there she expresses concern.

=========
Dear "Skuratov"! And you are the statements and "concerns" of the US State Department, "except here"do you often hear ???

[Malyuta]

Quote: venik

Dear "Skuratov"! And you often hear statements and "concerns" of the US State Department, "except here" ???

Thank you for your kind words, Dear Vladimir! Unfortunately or fortunately, I do not listen to Solovyov at all!

[venik]

Quote: Malyuta

Unfortunately or fortunately, I do not listen to Solovyov at all!

========
What? "Nightingale" has already moved to the State Department? What a news! And also say - "I'm not listening".....

[To be or not to be]

One diplomat said: "In our circles they say, the word is not a sparrow. Fly out, fly out!"
So there is reason to react so sharply to the armament of the US nuclear submarines with new nuclear weapons .. The Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement is not in itself .. And the process is based on the data of many services and the decisions of the leaders .. That’s not the case.

[To be or not to be]

for example, here is an article on how both sides play war games .. "Russian and US bombers have tried on the areas of their missile launch
0155AnalyticsToday, 19:21

"Bombers of Russia and the United States tried on their missile launch areas"
https://tehnowar.ru/148450-Bombardirovschiki-Rossii-i-SShA-primerilisy-k-rayonam-puska-svoih-raket.html

[shonsu]

This is not our problem. If they don’t hear, then let them try. )))

[avg]

This is not our problem. If they don’t hear, then let them try. )))

They will hear, even as they hear. Everyone who is supposed to and will hear and draw conclusions, even if they first show off for force.

[flicker]

The American military waves its nuclear club at the entire international community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela.

And what Israel did not mention , or do you not classify them as "progressive" countries?

[Vlad 67]

mistakenly put a plus instead of a minus, sorry - this is inadvertent) ...
rally around whoever is needed and answer in full size, mattresses - first of all, do not hesitate)))!

[DMB_95]

Quote: Civil

..unit all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.

Absolutely true, moderately emotional statement. But the "party of United Russia", apparently out of habit, was mentioned as a merited political worker. Do not fall for the little things, citizen.

[Mabius]

Quote: Herrr

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

Yeah, schaz!

They all hope to bleed someone first and when they start to drown in blood, then soak both participants ..!
The tactics are well-known, back in 1945 they had such a plan (to bomb the USSR) .. But Stalin, with his restraint, cooled them down sharply ... Well, the Army was wicked and trained .. Well, thank God then it suffered, and then the losses even more were .. Although in vain, it would be necessary to go to the English Channel

[Roman1970_1]

back in 1945 their plan was like this (to bomb the USSR) .. But Stalin, with his restraint, cooled them sharply ...

Yes, yes I remember there was such a Mabius, the chief adviser. And he advised the Americans and Stalin.
Therefore, today he shares with us the plans of those times.

[Thunderbolt]

You have already developed a counteraction plan, which is so valiant /// 3 minutes after the public article /// you published a counteraction plan.

Quote: Herrr

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war

We managed to repulse it, but no, with a missile-oncoming one ....... and meanwhile .... my purely amateurish opinion ----- a war, for example, in the Baltic States will be fought until the usual means of defense are exhausted, but then the RF will have to inflict a series of tactical poison strikes deep into the tactical depth of the NATO front so as not to hurt itself.

[The popuas]

It is written in Russian ... any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia where does the Baltic states

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Popuas

It is written in Russian ... any ICBMs from a submarine towards Russia, and here the Baltic states
Reply

And what are we discussing here? ”ZaHarovinson declared that we would answer, as it is written in a golden word in the motto of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces. panic?

[The popuas]

Why are the Baltic states dragged maybe because of this minus ... because of it they will not be vigorous at throwing bread at each other, for geldings this will be an occasion, but they haven’t gone anywhere in Russia

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Popuas

Why are the Baltic states dragged

Then, that this is the immediate and desired goal ---- to bring down Belarus and make a march along the roads in the style of a Manshtein's sickle. It is not clear why now about
they recall that in the Russian Charter of the Strategic Missile Forces the periods of danger and the degree of these periods are clearly and with an arrangement. I sailed to the Baltic states so that you would recognize the infringement of Kal.obr. Communism. In the midst of ruins and handfuls, as always, otherwise it doesn’t happen, the Russian Vanya came burrowed. And began to wage a non-European war. When instead of a departure ----- a counterattack, the Russian infantry departs and is fixed on the positions for what ....? Halder from the very June, very strongly began to perceive at Russian counterattacks.

[blackice]

And I sailed to the Baltic states so that you would recognize the infringement of Kal.obr. Under the crossfire of NATO artillery, in the midst of dashing gangs agitating for Communism. Among the ruins and handfuls, as always, otherwise it doesn’t happen, the Russian Vanya came buried

Eva how you citizen suffered !!!!
Note, if the stripes are so steep, so why didn’t they drive the Afghans through the cracks with their artillery?
Ahhh, yeah !!!!
Mountains there all sorts of spirits help, hiding them in the terrain.
So now, NATO will not have a blitzkrieg in Russia. It’s not in the desert of Saddammites to burn airplanes.
As for the Baltics, who is it against at all? The "proud" Balts are just yelling about the Russian threat, so as to somehow show that they still exist, otherwise they will forget about these proud peoples and then what to do? Neither you money from the striped breadwinner, nor your fame. So either they will die out, or again they will have to be friends with a neighbor. And to be friends with a neighbor is not a damn thing, because pride will be infringed.

[venik]

Quote: Thunderbolt

AU, minuscule --- what Zakharova brought new to the Russian Strategic Missile Forces strategy

========
Why would she "inject" something into the "Strategic Missile Forces" strategy? She, tea - does not serve in the General Staff, but works in the Foreign Ministry! And does his job fine - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends" and "bosom enemies" - then brings!
Hello everyone!

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: venik

does his job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - that he brings!
Hello everyone!

Our breadbasket of golden wheat ears of wheat, mine, our Ukrainian, was never in the sapper’s platoon, everyone went ahead, and the sappers were sharply counterattacked by the Soviet intelligence service. posthumous awards were no less than the Chuvashs and Ukrainians Under Fastov, Radomyshl and Zhytomyr, exclusively Ivanes Ivanovich Ivanovs fought, and Mikols at that time only fought against the Red Army. So they want to comb us, because a cut between all sorts of Gazprom and Naftogaz. But, the Soviet people remember sacredly that, through the Dnieper, the first car = a tank opened fire from the porch, it was found. They tried to unfold in the area, but were shackled by attack aircraft and the resistance of the Soviet infantry. A piercing German defense was struck south. And the crews of the leading tanks were not Muscovites, Kokoliki and Tatars, but mixed crews Ms. = Soviet.

[venik]

Quote: Thunderbolt

Our breadbasket of golden ears of wheat

=========
AND ABOUT WHAT let me ask this "simple opus" with "twists" in the direction of the "national question"? And what does it actually have to do with the quoted phrase:

Quote: Thunderbolt

does his job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - that he brings!

AND WHAT is the "deep connection" here?
No, of course, if you take all these "breadbasket of golden ears","found a weak spot"," s ,, only the ivans ivanovich ivanovs rebelled, and the mikols at that time only fought against the Red Army "and other other" pearls "of your opus as a result"profuse libation"- everything is clear! There are NO questions! Otherwise, NOTHING is clear ... And even vague suspicions about relevance subject ....
And therefore I don’t even ask to “decipher” such “deep thoughts”! (in such a state it is probably difficult to do) ...

[Siberian54]

Kolos, is this something of Nazism?

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: venik

does his job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - that he brings!
Hello everyone!

But why does it bring such a special thing, or before did NATO strategists not know that you can’t go to Russia since it’s parity nuclear? Mnouovschiki, enlighten what Zakharova said, which NATO did not know about!

[venik]

Quote: Thunderbolt

Why does it bring such a special thing or before NATO strategists did not know

=========
Nothing special and does not bring! In addition, despite all these newfangled American doctrines of "limited" and "tactical" "preemptive" strike, our doctrine contains NOTHING not changed and "if that" - we will answer immediately and "in full", i.e. as in the old anecdote: "to beat not on the passport, but immediately on the face"!
Why is there something incomprehensible?
And you also wonder: "Why are they minus?"

[Malyuta]

Quote: Popuas

. Any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia

But what was it when it was different ???

[venik]

Quote: Popuas

It is written in Russian ... any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia where does the Baltic states

========
And the respected "Thunderbolt" probably thinks that American nuclear submarines with ICBMs are floating in the "Baltic" ...

[The popuas]

C-isolation in May what starts ... uhhh

[venik]

Quote: Popuas

C-isolation in May what starts ... uhhh

==========
Why wait for that? Our people, oh, how ingenious! In connection with the problems "to figure out for three" during the "quarantine" they thought of drinking on Skype or Viber (in the "videoconference" mode) !!!
PS No! SUCH people - UNBEATABLE !!!

[Bratkov Oleg]

Quote: Popuas

... and here the Baltic states ...

The Baltic States are the center of world civilization, which is even more important than Ukraine.
Oooo ... how great they are!

[Charik]

Does any ICBM carry a bullseye or is it a dummy ride?

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Popuas

It is written in Russian ... any ICBMs from a submarine towards Russia, and here the Baltic states

And you are such a cool analyst that anything in an article jaundiced will gurgle, there you will pop up in the right bubble. And besides, in every second article on this resource tactical and technical data are discussed. The Baltic states are the closest light to Leningrad .. I drove along the highway from "them" Do you think the US light brigades are being thrown from Prague to NARVU? he overlaps with the Baltics trying to control the Baltic.
So what do we have ----- the silly USSR, which had the entire southern coast of the Baltic Sea and to the straits, numerous MRA forces and missile strike from the sea.
Now everything is much better. The more the potential of the armored vehicles of Poland and its allies increases, the happier the patriots rub their hands. Well, good luck! Previously, we had to deploy an appropriate district structure against the NATO army corps, but these are backward Soviet ones. Now, there are Iskanders under the command of the command district ... Kaliningrad Ure is clearly not suitable for them. Another evidence that the war / fleeting conflict with far-reaching prospects / will be waged by conventional weapons, but after forces, the parties will fix the border line. This is taught by the logic of antiaircraft defense against NATO ... Correct, if I missed it, maybe we have less TA or bombing forces. NATO. are aimed at our cities. No one will beat with a mace. Until the ground group is exhausted, strategists are only in standby mode

[The popuas]

This is an article about ICBMs in the direction of Russia, and not about strikers breaking through the defense of Kaliningrad! Do you think that if tactical Yao will be beaten in Kaliningrad, our people will not answer

[Lekz]

Merry you, however. This is how English and French soldiers are seen heroically dying for the independence of the tribalt.

[Olgovich]

Quote: Herrr

According to US military the use of tactical charges will allow you to win in conflicts with a potential enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

Yeah, schaz!

because of these tebils Doomsday Clock (Doomsday Clock) and show 23h 58 min -2 minutes before the apocalypse, the smallest time since 1947 ...

-Even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...

[kit88]

Who needs this watch and what exactly do they show?
Why exactly 23:58, not 15:39?
In 30 years they will show 23:59:45, and in forty 23: 59: 59: 23? And so, until the second coming, the arrows will move - the people are nightmare.
One fool invented, others repeat.

[Olgovich]

Quote: kit88

Who needs this watch and what exactly do they show?
Why exactly 23: 58, but not 15:39?
In 30 years they will show 23:59:45, and in forty 23: 59: 59: 23? And so, until the second coming, the arrows will move - the people are nightmare.
One invented a fool, others repeat.

Turk is one that does not understand - very simple and visual things.

Quote: kit88

In 30 years they will show 23:59:45and after forty 23: 59: 59: 23?

in 1949 it was. eg. 23.57. and in 196023.47, in 199123.41 .

WHAT can be incomprehensible here?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Olgovich

in 1949 it was. eg. 23.57. and in 1960 - 23.47, in 1991 - 23.41.
WHAT can be incomprehensible here?

Bullshit is all Andrew. As for me, if the mattresses had confidence that they could crush Russia with the means at their disposal with impunity, then this watch went ahead of the calendar rule and already tapped the new era of American planetary colonialism, but since Russia has weapons that are not available for interception and counteraction, the clock shows the countdown. These devils have so much confidence in their exceptionalism that they think that time is subject to them, but most likely time will show that the watchmaker who repairs the watch does not live in the United States.

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Olgovich

-Even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...

And how much was in the car crisis, tell me

[venik]

Quote: Thunderbolt

And how much was in the car crisis, tell me

========
23.53 (ie "less than 7 minutes"!). True, a caveat should be made: The Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved very quickly (within 38 days), the Clock did not have time to react, and their readings did not change.
In total, since 1947, they have been "translated" only 25 times!

[sniperino]

Quote: Olgovich

because of these morons Doomsday Clock and show 23h 58 min

It is unlikely that any causal relationship can be traced here. The block that synchronizes these and a number of other related events is somewhere else. A watch is not a reflection of the situation, but the same means of information and psychological impact, like local hypochondriacs with depressants, as statements by generals, are only much more powerful because of their symbolism and wider in reach of the audience.

[Malyuta]

Quote: sniperino

A watch is not a reflection of the situation, but the same means of information and psychological impact, like local hypochondriacs with depressants, as statements by generals, are only much more powerful because of their symbolism and wider in reach of the audience.

Very cool said, sorry for the quotes will not fly apart.

[venik]

Quote: sniperino

It is unlikely that any causal relationship can be traced here. The block that synchronizes these and a number of other related events is somewhere else.

=========
Doomsday Clock is a project of the University of Chicago magazine's Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, launched in 1947 by the creators of the first American atomic bomb.
The time left until midnight symbolizes the tension in the international situation and progress in the development of nuclear weapons. Midnight itself symbolizes the moment of a nuclear cataclysm.
The decision to transfer arrows is made by the journal’s board of directors with the help of invited experts, including, in particular, 18 Nobel Prize winners.
Over the 70-year history of the project, the hands of the Clock have changed their position 25 times.

[sniperino]

Quote: venik

The decision to transfer arrows is made by the journal’s board of directors with the help of invited experts, including, in particular, 18 Nobel Prize winners.

And who makes the decision to gather experts? In addition, the creators of nuclear weapons and other laureates are not necessarily competent in the military-political situation, the goals of politicians and the plans of the general staff, but they themselves are brewed in some kind of information broth.

[sniperino]

Quote: sniperino

And who decides on the collection of experts

The board of directors is a few people. Are they independent too?

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Olgovich

even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...

The Caribbean crisis is not worn right now, now they prefer the unhai noir with shades of gray ..

[Thunderbolt]

The money will go to the rescue of travel agencies, they provide jobs and Pepsi for Coca, beer corners are also in sorrow, in short, all foreign brands that provide an influx of currency in the form of percentage of speculative transactions. This is all the riffraffers that promise drug support. It’s not morning yet, but fresh ..

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Herrr

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

Yeah, schaz!

The American military charter says that if resistance is tactically useless and life-threatening, then you need to surrender.
In captivity, we must behave calmly, without causing aggression on the part of the captors, to answer us ALL questions, so as not to cause a threat to my life (I do not recall anything like that in the Soviet Combat Charter).

Just like in our exercises ....
But on our teachings - OWN, not enemies. And there’s a way to talk to the enemy - at least one sadistic pathologist in a platoon is always there.

Same thing globally - A retaliatory strike is considered unacceptable, which can destroy up to 13% of the population and up to 20% of infrastructure. Namely, such an answer, according to the miscalculations of Pentagon analysts, can be brought by Russia.

Therefore, American hopes in the event of a global nuclear conflict to substitute Europe, and to sit behind the "Big Puddle" themselves do not come true in the light of the statement of the GDP that "strikes will be delivered to the centers of decision-making."

Hence the moral - we will defend ourselves (and have something) until the global destruction of the "decision-making center".
I don’t think that the bumpy Americans, who only “save the world” in Hollywood, but in fact fight “to their first blood” (like the boys in school) will bark at the nuclear conflict with Russia.


PS Information about "bumpy Americans" fighting "to the first blood" - from my father, who saw the American special forces nearby in different parts of the globe. He himself fought "full contact" with them, his friends, whom I know, fought ... They fall to the ground with a broken hare and knock with their right hand .... Vaunted "green berets" .... These are ours fighting for the Motherland. And they - for the "green card", for a grant for training, for a pension ... And, in their opinion, what the hell is all this to the dead?

[Errr]

Eh, I’ve written off already ... And then after all, no Combat Charter would have been needed, it would have been enough only:

... and as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend her courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing your blood and life itself to achieve complete victory over enemies.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Herrr

Eh, I’ve written off already ... And then after all, no Combat Charter would have been needed, it would have been enough only:

... and as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend her courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing your blood and life itself to achieve complete victory over enemies.

What is there to answer, only
And another kiss of the Banner and the beret.

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

Yeah, schaz!

But why? Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq - they can bomb almost with impunity: in the UN, several countries will express concern.

[Errr]

Quote: Simargl

Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq - they can bomb almost with impunity: in the UN, several countries will express concern.

And if “concern” (in this case “concern” is not a very suitable word) of the Russian Federation does not have a wide resonance in the UN, these will be the last days of the latter's existence as a truly global [universal] organization. She will thus sign her own death warrant and will exactly repeat the fate of the League of Nations. Well, then, I hope you yourself know what happened ...

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

And if the "concern" of the Russian Federation ...

I did not say anything about Russia separately:

Quote: Simargl

some countries will express concern

[Errr]

In this case, Russia simply cannot "not attend to". She will definitely be among these very "few".

[Simargl]

So what? You can take care of it in different ways: for a "tick" (if they bomb, say, Japan), or so that they sweat ...

[Errr]

Yes, it seems that they are not going to sweat (or steam) overseas at all even if the representative of Russia in the UN is very indignant, since when strikes are delivered with small "vigorous" charges outside the territory of the Russian Federation, a guaranteed response from the latter is guaranteed and will not follow. I think so.

[Simargl]

Initially, I replied that the use of nuclear weapons does not necessarily lead to a global war - it is enough to use it in a country that is not supported by a global player.
For Argentina, who will get involved? All. Expression oooh very deep concern.

[Errr]

If you build a more authentic chain of events, you will see that any use of nuclear weapons invariably leads the world to a global nuclear war. with the inevitable collapse of the global security system represented by the UN as a result of its local "moderate" use (see my first answer yesterday to you), the only factor holding back this global thermonuclear carnage is eliminated. I do not advise anyone to build illusions at the expense of its optional. Always and from everything is held back only by a psychological barrier. The introduction into the consciousness of only one thought about the possibility of using nuclear weapons will automatically remove the last obstacles on the way of its everyday use.
Everything here is not simple, but very elementary. Even a small series of local military operations with the use of nuclear weapons will very quickly develop into a global thermonuclear catastrophe. Too many problems have accumulated in most states and it is very tempting to solve them all in one fell swoop. With good intentions, the path is known to be paved.

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

The introduction into the consciousness of only one thought about the possibility of using nuclear weapons will automatically remove the last obstacles to its routine use.

You, as I understand the misunderstanding about the power of nuclear weapons. Yes, strategic warheads — wunderwafers of some power (megatons of fuel cell) are tactical — they are relatively weak, and there are less than 1kt of fuel cell.
You can compare the bombing of Dresden and Hiorshima with Nagasaki

 Compare photo

и

different way, one result.

[Errr]

It is possible to make a tactical charge even less than 0,02 kt TEQ (we don’t take into account the exotic stuffing like Cf-252, because it is extremely expensive), but this has nothing to do with the topic we are considering. We are here and now amicably discussing very specific W76-2s with an estimated explosion power of 5 kt TEQ.
With the captured pictures of the greatest tragedies, you suddenly pushed me to black humor:

Do you see radiation?

No.

That is OK. You will feel it soon.

Well, seriously, the difference between the consequences of a conventional bombing and nuclear bombing. You’ll excuse me for the bad manners, but my emotions go wild.

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

Well, seriously, the difference between the consequences of a conventional bombing and nuclear bombing.

Have you looked at the photo? There is a difference?
Now, 20-100-500 bombers simply do not fly: they both get better, and targets are more accurately plotted on the maps.

Quote: Herrr

We are here and now amicably discussing very specific W76-2s with an estimated explosion power of 5 kt TEQ.

That's not a lot. especially in the concrete city.

[Errr]

And so you come to the understanding that

... everyone will be given according to his faith. May it come true!

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

And so you come to the understanding that

... everyone will be given according to his faith. May it come true!

I would not want a war, nor man-made disasters, nor natural.
In the "stone jungle" you need a boNba 1k times more powerful for a comparable effect. The building of the Chamber of Commerce was almost exactly under the epicenter. But it is half-wood. and by the way, where is the crater in Hiroshima or Nagasaki?

[Errr]

Quote: Simargl

and by the way, where is the funnel in Hiroshima or Nagasaki?

Little Boy was fired at an altitude of 600 to 500 meters above the ground, and Fat Man at about 300 meters. With air nuclear explosions at such altitudes, craters are not formed.
On August 6th, in Hiroshima, more than 45 thousand people died immediately and almost as many later died from radiation sickness. In the event of a ground explosion, there would be much more casualties in view of the subsequent considerable radioactive contamination of the area. Therefore, I allow myself to repeat:

There is a huge difference between the consequences of conventional bombing and nuclear. This is not the same thing at all.

[Simargl]

Quote: Herrr

During airborne nuclear explosions, no craters are formed at such altitudes.

And such capacities. Megaton and from 1 km will leave a funnel.

Quote: Herrr

70 thousand people died immediately and almost as many subsequently died from radiation sickness.

What is radiation sickness? And how much "better" it is to die from burns than from radiation sickness?

Quote: Herrr

In the event of a ground explosion, there would be much more casualties in view of the subsequent considerable radioactive contamination of the area.

Now nuclear weapons are much cleaner. The US is committed to developing just such clean charges. So that you can use the cleared area.

Quote: Herrr

Therefore, I allow myself to repeat:

Are we talking about the use of nuclear weapons in strategic or tactical, up to several ct, options? Are we talking about the modern use of high-precision bombs, or carpet bombing?

[evgenii67]

What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

[Prisoner]

It does not seem to everyone. Therefore, some dull morons had to be reminded.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Captive

It does not seem to everyone. Therefore, some dull morons had to be reminded.

Are you talking about those who keep money there, buy real estate and keep children with wives and lovers? It’s necessary to warn Alla Borisovna, otherwise it’s not an hour and she’s hooked, she’s good, she sang about harlequin and the ferryman.

[sniperino]

Quote: Malyuta

It’s necessary to warn Alla Borisovna, otherwise it’s not an hour and she’ll be hooked

Will this elite, according to Brzezinski, prevent Russia from striking back? Not even funny.

[Malyuta]

Quote: sniperino

Will this elite, according to Brzezinski, prevent Russia from striking back? Not even funny.

The elite allowed this clowness to be close to her overseas estates, so that she could entertain there, on the spot, without unnecessary troubles! But this is really not funny.

[sniperino]

Quote: Malyuta

elite allowed

Someone allows something to Zelensky, but who can object to the commander in chief? Full name does he have? Certainly not Pugachev. If you write that the commander in chief will not answer, then he is hardly a copycat of Gaddafi, and his palaces were not found anywhere

[Mabius]

Quote: evgenii67

What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

They check the reaction, who and how will react ..

[Charik]

Yes, as they usually react, they will start shouting that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons.

[Mabius]

Quote: Charik

Yes, as they usually react, they will start shouting that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons.

Well, everything is as usual .. But the main thing is that Russia has stopped expressing "concern", and in plain text says "exceptional" what a tough reaction will be to their provocation .. And this pleases!
We do not want war, and most of all in the world we know that THIS IS SUCH!

Stop and do not anger the Russians ..

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: evgenii67

What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

So I'm trying to convey to people that there is a Strategic Missile Forces, and no Zakharova has any power when the steppe is like a prayer, but service is like a battle. Enough to frighten the people with war - if there is a superwar, the missiles will take off, but the trick is that in such a way they are trying to isolate themselves from the problems of our armored personnel carrier, from all vehicles of the "Armat" system, in the air a MiGar without AFAR and Sukhoi without anything. Where is the container for the Su-30? If it is not there, then the Afaristic capabilities of our aircraft, earlier --- invented, we sell to the Indians, because. no secrecy and NATO already had such "landlords" and were tested in combat companies. So get ready for other surprises. Our MiG, excellent in terms of flight characteristics, looked like a beggar against the background of afarist rafals, etc.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Thunderbolt

in such a way they are trying to isolate themselves from the problems of our armored personnel carrier, from all the vehicles of the "Armat" system, in the air MiGar without AFAR and Sukhoi without anything. Where is the container for the Su-30? If it is not there, then the Afaristic capabilities of our aircraft, earlier --- invented, we sell to the Indians, because. no secrecy and NATO already had such "landlords" and were tested in combat companies. So get ready for other surprises. Our MiG, excellent in terms of flight characteristics, looked like a beggar against the background of afarist rafals, etc.

Here for such statements of the Ancient rotted! And I just shake your hand!
PySy. Zadolbali already these Netanalagians with their spiritual simplicity.

[Cyril G ...]

How many fighters with AFAR have not tried to recognize in Europe?

[mole]

Quote: Mabius

Quote: evgenii67

What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

Check the reaction, who and how
Will react ..

We have this "response" provided by the Law. In the light of the vague decisions made by the state authorities and the mistakes made earlier and in the present. trying to unite the nation in the face of another threat. Purpose: to raise the rating of the State Power. In a word: window dressing.
Now from all the "irons" will trumpet an angry and decisive statement.

[Mabius]

Quote: Mole

Now from all "irons" will be blowing about an angry and decisive statement

Well, neolibers will blow it ... But everything is done in silence, they just warned EVERYTHING!

[mole]

We will see. But I'm sure the central channels will be one of the "top" news.

[Mabius]

Quote: Mole

We will see. But I'm sure the central channels will be one of the "top" news.

"Our media" is not ours for a long time .. They are chatting about all sorts of animals that were rescued somewhere and similar nonsense flash mobs in the manner of the Western BBC and CNN .... Ugh damn But serious topics are hushed up!
And the military theme is generally taboo. .

[mole]

Quote: Mabius

Quote: Mole

We will see. But I'm sure the central channels will be one of the "top" news.

"Our media" is not ours for a long time .. They are chatting about all sorts of animals that were rescued somewhere and similar nonsense flash mobs in the manner of the Western BBC and CNN .... Ugh damn But serious topics are hushed up!
And the military theme is generally taboo. .

In this case, "reversal"! Showed the type "balls" to the hegemon. So I'm sure they will definitely be promoted.
"A ray of light" among nonsense and flash mob. The emotional component is already different.

[Mabius]

Quote: Mole

"A ray of light" among nonsense and flash mob. The emotional component of already a friend

Perhaps it will be so, but it’s better to let it be silent, otherwise it will be turned upside down

[mole]

Better to show the real problems, but how in the Lake. You look at the beautiful expanse of water, beautiful beaches, sand, water, the sun. And you plunge under water and so much trash, garbage and the deeper, the more trash and dirt. And you understand that there are huge problems with the ecology on this Lake.

[Keyser soze]

It’s interesting that they might think and shoot with nuclear weapons .... certainly not in Russia, they won’t have enough intelligence, but in Iran or North Korea ... This generally reduces moral barriers in the use of atomic weapons and is very bad.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Keyser Soze

It’s embarrassing what they might think and shoot with nuclear weapons ...

You are probably a good user:
TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!

[Keyser soze]

TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!

I don’t understand, dear ... you were oppressed by the construction "can shoot nuclear weapons"? She seems to be correct. And if not - bang with her ...

Bulgarian and Russian are very close. Since I write here I catch myself that I began to confuse words in Bulgarian. Some words are the same, some exist in Church Slavonic or in Russian of the 19th century and in Bulgarian. Damn his head, what to speak of a user at once in both languages ​​.... With English it is easier. Everything is different there.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Keyser Soze

English is easier. Everything is different there.

I spoke only because the Russian language does not have the adverb “oppressive” ... Therefore, I advised you to use a translator to give your words meaning and logic. But then 11 "literate" decided that I personally inflicted a grudge on them personally?
I will say in Russian: “Type shit in your mouth and spit on me!” And remember, for me your mass stupidity is ridiculous to a much greater degree than the difficulties of translating a Bulgarian user who is fluent in MORE and English.

PS
Five kilograms of tomatoes!

[Keyser soze]

You are probably a good user:

And here is the case, I will ask you a question. I honestly get confused fundamentally:

"went to the market and bought a 5 kilogram tomato", or
"5 kilograms of tomato" or
"5 kilograms tomato" or even
"5 kilograms of tomatoes"

in Bulgarian, you can only use the form (translated) - "bought 5 kilograms of tomatoes."

No, my friend, the hell will break with our tongues. And also to know the difference between them - that’s for sure I can’t afford :)

Plus, I’ll press you, you just asked a question, I don’t think you deserve a minus.

[poquello]

Quote: Keyser Soze

And here is the case, I will ask you a question. I honestly get confused fundamentally:

"went to the market and bought a 5 kilogram tomato", or
"5 kilograms of tomato" or
"5 kilograms tomato" or even
"5 kilograms of tomatoes"

how is it according to the new Russian rules xs, but in general "5 kilograms of tomatoes", for what are 5 kilograms of what tomatoes, and maybe grams and grams you are equal, the last option became

[venik]

Quote: Keyser Soze

"went to the market and bought a 5 kilogram tomato", or
"5 kilograms of tomato" or
"5 kilograms tomato" or even
"5 kilograms of tomatoes"

=======
Eugene! Do not guess! It will be correct: "5 kilograms of tomatoes"!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: venik

It will be correct: "5 kilograms of tomatoes"!

5 kilos of tomatoes, and all the short life.

[ROSS_51]

Quote: ROSS 42

TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!

Why this schizophrenic punctuation? Together with the capsloc, it looks like a diagnosis. Drink a valerian.

[venik]

Dear ROSS_51, are you by any chance with ROSS 42 not twins? Or just - namesakes?

[Mabius]

Quote: Keyser Soze

but in Iran or North Korea ... This generally reduces the moral barriers in the use of atomic weapons and is very bad.

Think dangerous here, but most likely, they are preparing us for this and how we will respond in Russia .. I react so, just try to hit Iran .. It will not seem to you in the USA either

[don-1500]

The answer will be, it’s understandable, but I wonder where our 1,2 and 3 RBMs are aimed at. Washington? New York? Colorado?

[Sky strike fighter]

Contact the FSB for detailed explanations. They will tell you there.

[Pete mitchell]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Contact the FSB for details ...

Well, why are you misleading your colleague: you must contact the General Staff, at least the Strategic Missile Forces. And then yes, the FSB will explain ...

[Malyuta]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Contact the FSB for detailed explanations. They will tell you there.

But what if they don’t remember?

[Charik]

The FSB should not worry where the ICBMs are aimed, the question is most likely to the Strategic Missile Forces

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Charik

The FSB should not worry where the ICBMs are aimed, the question is most likely to the Strategic Missile Forces

The FSB should be concerned about those who want to know exactly where the ICBMs are aimed.

[Roman1970_1]

Ask Mabius, he knows everything. Americans share their plans with him.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Roman1970_1

Ask Mabius, he knows everything. Americans share their plans with him.

No, to comrade "B" the signal comes directly from the socket, by means of the fingers of the right hand, the left one is slightly burnt.

[Crimean partisan 1974]

Ask Mabius, he knows everything ... and what is it that you need to have seven spans in your forehead ???? blows to megacities are in the past. they will rummage around the nuclear power plant. and look at the map for nuclear power plants. Hope who will win to find out is not difficult

[venik]

Quote: don-1500

but I wonder where our 1,2 and 3 RBMs are aimed at? Washington? New York? Colorado?

=========
Well this is depending on WHAT you mean by the abbreviation MRB:
- Small fishing bot?
“A motorized reconnaissance battalion?”
or
- A series of books "Mass Radio Library"?

[don-1500]

Well, yes, I agree. Wrong

[Charik]

VV clearly said hypersound in decision centers, that is, where the orders come from, further down the list, military bases — the largest cities — industry — think it up yourself

[Pashhenko Nikolay]

Somehow I’m one hundred percent and not sure about it. Children have so many there. Will they raise a hand? With the Turks, cheeks blew and blew away.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay

So many kids there

Well of course there.
Kids are unnecessary ...
Not time to change manuals?

[Mabius]

Quote: Spade

Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay

So many kids there

Well of course there.
Kids are unnecessary ...
Not time to change manuals?

These do not change the manuals .. Most of the shouting "time to blame" in Russia sit and shit here, earning good money on this .. This is the statistics!

[Malyuta]

Quote: Mabius

Most of those shouting "it's time to blame" is in Russia sitting and shitting here, making good money on this.

This is something new, just 3 months ago, they made good money only on oil, gas and the budget.

Quote: Mabius

This is the statistics!

From Rospozorstat? Then everything is correct, Brzezinski in the furnace, he lied about the elite.

[Mabius]

Quote: Malyuta

This is something new, just 3 months ago, they made good money only on oil, gas and the budget.

Well, yes, we are for you a "gas station with rockets" .. We know this and do not want to argue, you still bark and humiliate .. Think for yourself, what and how.

Quote: Malyuta

From Rospozorstat? Then everything is correct, Brzezinski in the furnace, he lied about the elite.

He deceased dreamed of the collapse of the USSR and this happened alas .. But the Russian spirit is more difficult to destroy here .. Russia has the ability to be reborn from the ashes and become even stronger and it’s not in the power of the matter .. That's how we live bread!
Do not anger us and you will be happy

[Malyuta]

Quote: Mabius

Do not anger us and you will have happiness negative

And why are you showing happiness in the opposite direction!
You get at least angry, at least not angry, anyway kaput?

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Mabius

This is the statistics!

Statistics from the echo of Moscow? In the United States, one out of every six supports the preemptive strike against Russia without hesitation. For honesty, run a similar survey in Russia (not in the Duma or on TV, but on the street). Sure, be surprised at the number of sane people, unlike ...

[Kronos]

And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

[Lopatov]

Quote: Kronos

And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

Are they stupid enough to leave "property and relatives" there after the United States, together with Europe, began brandishing a sanctions cudgel?

[Kronos]

Yes left - citizenship and accounts

[Lopatov]

Well, of course. They are dumber than a steam locomotive ...

[Kronos]

Listen to the statements of officials and doubts about stupidity will disappear

[Lopatov]

You already decide whether they are smart enough to steal, or stupid enough to lose.
And then you somehow have it all at the same time ...

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Spade

You already decide whether they are smart enough to steal, or stupid enough to lose.

You yourself would decide on the priorities. And then from your words it is not clear whether you deny the facts of the presence of business, property and accounts of relatives of senior officials abroad, or agree that this is impossible a priori, and the facts and the presence of registers with names are just fake news.
We also do not slurp cabbage soup. But the EU and the rest of the world community, about the need for a merger with which the HMS and EBN have been talking for so long, just doesn’t take anything away, adheres to some rules and laws. Here are just a little tell us about the correctness at the level of laws requirements. We are more often struck by the news that the “cute and fluffy” Russian GAZPROM SHOULD (!!!) pay billions (2,56) dollars to the ugly and vile NAFTOGAZ. If it is against the law - why pay?
And about the non-Russian oligarchic fairy tale “How one non-Russian peasant stole in Russia and got to live abroad” tell Usmanov, Abramovich ... Yes, there is one there that brought with it money from the Russian PFR ...
But to you, the "true and only" defenders of Russia and guardians for her happy tomorrow, such information that splashes of the vital product excreted by the kidneys into the eyes ...
Absolutely no! And all these withdrawn billions, the sizes of which are broadcast from federal irons, are lies and lies. After all, to be convinced of the opposite (capital inflow from the outside), it is enough to look out the window. There you can see how the Russians are "shoveling money" with shovels ... Or the Lopatovs with the help of the Russians?

[Mabius]

Quote: Kronos

And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

Well, who’s smarter, he’s already satisfied with his children in Russia and legalizes his assets .. Here is this outflow and is alarming .. Work, they will not be obvious, for the good of Russia ..

[Malyuta]

Quote: Kronos

And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

They have everything near Voronezh, from the ruble they have taken everything closer to "paradise".

[Marconi41]

Quote: Kronos

And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

This, in principle, is not important, if a rocket flies at you, then believe me, you least think about your relatives abroad. You just do your job here in war as in war: Either you - or you. A council of relatives in America will not be assembled at this time. There will be no time!

[Charik]

the main thing is that the Chief-TAM had nothing

[Spektr]

Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill. And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems. They hate Russia and cherish the jackal, so why pity them.

[Mabius]

Quote: Spectrum

Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill.

But there is something to lose in this world ..!

Quote: Spectrum

And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems. They hate Russia and cherish the jackal, so why pity them.

And on the start buttons are not their children and grandchildren are sitting .. Here we talked))))

A joke with meaning ...

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Spade

Well of course there.
Kids are unnecessary ...
Not time to change manuals?

It’s not time, because the kids are still there, and the first 10 years ago, referring to the people of ours officially stated that the offshore capital withdrawal system did not suit him and he was ready, under general approval, to deal with such people's injustice. He then, during another appeal to the people, Volodin, Medvedev., Gundyaev and all the other Sechins and Millers on duty applauded on duty. And if you have a military airbag, this does not mean that you are a king and a god. For example, I live from zp to zp, investing all my money in Most of Russians run out of supplies when Chu nothing to put in the race, then I nachnuts hungry bunty.Kak riots sweep schooled BB and cops showed dashing nineties ---- when people flood the area, the Gendarmerie goes on the side of the people.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Thunderbolt

Even the first 10 years ago, referring to the people of ours, he officially stated that the offshore capital withdrawal system did not suit him and he was ready, under general approval, to mortally fight such popular injustice.

He always lied ....

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Spectrum

Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill. And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems.

Another truth in the host of false propaganda ...
This is for those inside the product from which ICBMs will fly, there are no relatives over the hill. And those who give orders and sign laws sparing the taxes of “rich Russian Pinocchio”, which spread rot for their people, who have not been able to reproduce, have very peculiar interests and a lot of friends with relatives and acquaintances. So, do not weave about the disinterestedness of Russian officials, "honest and incorruptible, courageous and principled." Your weaving will not close the holes gnawed by these (how to say softer?) Insects ...

[Bratkov Oleg]

It seems that the children of those who press the button are sitting in Russia.

[Zaurbek]

There, the SPRN will already understand who and where flies .... and before it reaches, our rocket will fly towards. And there let them understand.

[Grandfather]

Quote: Zaurbek

There, the SPRN will already understand who and where flies .... and before it reaches, our rocket will fly towards. And there let them understand.

no one will understand.

[Zaurbek]

There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.

[dvina71]

Quote: Zaurbek

There’s just such a concept,

This is the concept of a kind of thousandth salvo with axes .. but always the bearers of this dogma pour in on simple questions.
In order to guarantee the destruction of cp, the warhead should explode very close to it .. a full-fledged head with a charge of one hundred ct, 5ct .. only annoy ..

[Zaurbek]

There, mixed warheads are considered .... highly accurate simple and small nuclear ones .... then interception of those who started.
The main idea is that, in addition to powerful nuclear warheads with low accuracy in cities, there is nothing to answer, and we will only be affected by mines, decision centers and dictator. And everyone else is alive and well. They will meet the occupation government.

[dvina71]

Quote: Zaurbek

The main idea is that, in addition to powerful nuclear warheads with low accuracy in cities, there is nothing to answer and we will only be hit by mines, decision centers and dictator

There is such a thing .. When they signed the agreement on the pro, the USSR, as its only authorized cover area, chose the central industrial one, including Moscow, but the states covered their starting brig.
As you can see .. the US leadership on its population, while they were very afraid of the oblique Soviet apples ... that could endure their ....
And your theory of the global strike .. poured on the first question .. positional areas of percussion weapons? It’s simpler .. where the CD carriers will be spread across the territory of the Russian Federation .. I remind you .. the range of the main US cr ... ax ... about 2 kilometers ...

[Zaurbek]

Mediterranean Sea, North, Pacific Ocean + aviation from bases

[dvina71]

Quote: Zaurbek

Mediterranean Sea, North, Pacific Ocean + aviation from bases

And where will their axes get to? This time .. Two .. how soon will the nuclear warhead arrive in the area of ​​dense concentration of Kr carriers?

[Zaurbek]

How soon? Can accumulate shock forces .... we have a lot of forces to counter the AUG? 10 Aug USA, plus allied forces ..... launches of the Kyrgyz Republic badly ....

[dvina71]

Quote: Zaurbek

10 AuG USA,

update data on avikas usa ..

[Zaurbek]

So the time is calm now .....

[Charik]

where to find 10 aug of the usa? if there are any, when all of them are released, they will not be idle

[Charik]

Nonsense

[Charik]

he clearly told the BR with the usual warhead, the Ax is KR — I don’t know if they have nuclear warheads now, but you’re doing each other’s brains, something strikes one with a ballistic missile on the territory of the Russian Federation (see the Russian Federation there is no anti-aircraft defense capable of shooting down BR ) and we don’t have a bnm answer, we don’t have Iskander-type BRs, and you tell him about the blow by the thousands of Axes that will be detected instantly and the answer will be not only the KR that the Russian Federation has, but in full.

[Marconi41]

Quote: Zaurbek

There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.

What are you ?! And we will sit and wait until the missile hits the target, what would it be with the nuclear charge or not? Well, you give a pancake.

[Zaurbek]

It depends on who we will steer. In the 90s, maybe they would not have decided. Or they may break the connection, they are not stupid people either. Maybe someone will bribe .... the kids are all there, the money, too.

[Marconi41]

Quote: Zaurbek

It depends on who we will steer

Yes, who would not steer! Even if the supreme hesitates, those who have no interests abroad will very quickly help him.

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Zaurbek

There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.

This is not a concept, but a disappointing diagnosis.

[Charik]

“I do not see a single case in which Russia could resort to its nuclear potential, while in American banks there is $ 500 billion belonging to the Russian elite. You’ll figure out whose elite is yours or ours already. ”- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to the Carter Administration, and during Clinton’s presidency, the author of the concept of NATO eastward expansion

[dvina71]

Quote: Charik

US banks hold $ 500 billion owned by the Russian elite. You’ll figure out whose elite is yours or ours already. ”

And what is there to understand .. this is of course yours. Only in the states you become more elite with the growth of stocks of money .. as you approach the trilliow, it’s already exactly the elite .. all the more .. What is 500 billion? Some rogue people ..

[Charik]

turned everything upside down, it’s not I said, read it carefully

[cniza]

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

If this is true, then they are sick all over, which I do not really believe in ...

[Charik]

maybe they think so in a conflict with Iran or SevKor, there will be no global, and the conflict is limited

[cniza]

And it does not matter, there will no longer be options ...)))

[Proton]

Yes, these small charges are not about us, they are well aware there, if anything, then we.

[Doctor]

I don’t understand, if the Americans are reducing the power of nuclear charges, is that kind of good?
Or what increase, what decrease anyway badly?
Because like the Americans ...

[_Ugene_]

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.

this they mean that no matter what charge will fly in our direction, small tactical or large strategic, no one will understand and strategic will fly in response, so that the "partners" do not experience illusions

[Avior]

Not really
There are few such missiles with weakened charges, and their use is uniquely spelled out in the US nuclear strategy, adopted a couple of years ago.
It says that if an adversary inflicts a nuclear strike with a tactical nuclear charge in a conventional war, these missiles are designed for a strictly metered retaliatory strike

[SVD68]

Quote: Arzt

I don’t understand, if the Americans are reducing the power of nuclear charges, is that kind of good?
Or what increase, what decrease anyway badly?

The thing is different. They place these charges on strategic weapons - on ballistic missiles of submarines. This is a clear provocation in an attempt to force us (Russia) to think about what charges the SLBMs are flying at us with and delay in retaliating. Zakharova said that we will not hesitate and immediately strike back with all strategic nuclear forces.

[Military77]

The mattresses are full of opa with plutonium initiators of the TC charge. They must be of very high purity, without impurity of decomposition products, the service life of the initiator is 20-30 years. The last plant for the production of initiators was closed in 1991, so they make "on the knee" from 150KT TN BGs, just nuclear 5-8KT

[Charik]

And what could be different?

[iouris]

One should not be afraid of launching from a nuclear submarine, but of repetition of the "Malta".

[Charik]

And in the photo Ohio in my opinion.

[antivirus]

it sounds strange after the policies of MSG and EBN
extremely slowly pick up the hands, ... not to mention are the horses harnessed?

[Kronos]

And last year’s blow of the Tomahawks at the base where the Russian military were so trifles?

[_Ugene_]

why are they making such warlike statements? they want to raise the price of oil or what?

[Sky strike fighter]

By the principle of a monkey with a grenade. They don’t know how to behave, having such an arsenal. At least the current US authorities. Forget their comments.

[DEVIL LIFE'S]

It can be translated like that, man, I don’t slander you very much, but you don’t answer me, I'm a lady

[Maas]

Yes, reluctant to comment on Mrs. Zakharova, she often carries nonsense.
No one even plans an attack on Russian territory, except in a nightmare. In what sore head would the idea of ​​attacking a nuclear superpower arise? Proxy attacks, yes, economic wars, yes. But there will never be a direct attack on Russia, because it is stingy.

[Sibguest]

It’s worth reminding the brave (before the first shot) striped-Yankee Yankees of the words of Prince Alexander Nevsky: whoever comes to us with the ball will receive the puck (forgive the prince for the irony, but to the place).

[Kronos]

Do not think that Americans can’t fight

[Sibguest]

The history of the wars of the United States of America has shown that they can NOT fight, but they can only fight with a knowingly weak enemy.

[Maas]

Sibguest, I will comment on your nonsense about the stupid Yankees:
in World War II, they fought very well even with the Germans and the Japanese. But the main thing is to throw a hat higher and shout cheers?

[poquello]

Quote: Maas

in the second world they fought very well

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))

[Bratkov Oleg]

For three and a half years, the Yankees fought with Japan, bombed peaceful cities with atomic bombs, and why was the USSR needed there? But, the USSR, according to the agreement, entered the war with Japan, and a little more than two weeks later, defeated it. Two weeks and three and a half years! In 1943 alone, the United States built almost 70 aircraft carriers, about a dozen and a half, offhand, percussion, and 50 escort ... Every three days they launched an aircraft carrier, cruiser, or destroyer! Horror what a power !!! But the USSR made Japan surrender in two weeks.

[TatarinSSSR]

I’m sitting right there and I see how in the command center of the General Staff they suddenly receive a message and a picture of a rocket flying from the ocean towards Russia, and the Ministry of Defense calls the president - they say they launched a rocket from us from the ocean - and who is that? Ministry of Defense - I don’t know. President - what kind of rocket? Ministry of Defense - I don’t know. The president is like that - everything is clear. She is from an American submarine and with a small nuclear charge! Launch a nuclear missile in Washington! The Ministry of Defense is like that - that's all, the rocket flew .......... Che for nonsense, she said? Who's scared?

[Bratkov Oleg]

Quote: TatarinSSSR

I’m sitting right there and I see how in the command center of the General Staff they suddenly receive a message and a picture of a rocket flying from the ocean towards Russia, and the Ministry of Defense calls the president - they say they launched a rocket from us from the ocean ...

Well, at the end of the USSR it was. Air defense had the right to bring down someone, only with the permission of a minimum of the Minister of Defense, or even Gorbachev personally. They report to the headquarters that Rust is flying, they did not know then that it was Rust, but they report that there is no answer from the Kremlin, or they drink at the dacha, you can’t disturb them, or they take a steam bath in a bathhouse with whores. And Rust sat in the clearing, and lost his air defense, then took off, and then flew ... And before that, an intruder flies over Kamchatka, doesn’t respond to signals, but cannot be shot down - there is no permission from the Kremlin, the Soviet Union’s leadership, tired of whores, is sleeping , the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the CPSU is dozing ... Then he woke up, and he received a report, such as from Kamchatka, asking whether to bring down the offender?
- Yes, shoot down to hell!
And the plane is already in neutral waters, left the territory of the USSR, it’s too late to drink Borjomi ... And the interceptor, according to the order, was shot down. Already in neutral space, because of which there was this noise with the South Korean Boeing. Shot down over his territory, it would be easier, but it was impossible, the Secretary General did not allow.
As with the Strategic Missile Forces, I don’t know, at least any division could shoot back with what was left after using nuclear weapons on it, independently, without an order from Moscow. But it was up to the duty shifts themselves to decide whether to allow or not. I don’t know how the alert worked about a nuclear attack on the country.

[Junior Private]

Quote: Nikolai-1970

One Masha puffs up and dances the "birch"

Maybe Kalinka? That's how the people are firing.

[Bratkov Oleg]

Quote: Nikolai-1970

Also saw a joke.
Russia ranks 4th in the world in military spending and 127th in health care.
Ha ha ha ....

At the same time, the more they die from coronavirus, simple flu, the more they spend on medicine? In Russia, doctors are engaged in postscript; there is no virus in Russia. Old Man in Belarus finally leaked it in plain text, but Americans, French, British, Italians die like flies ...

[Charik]

How can you discuss this nonsense at all, how do you imagine a nuclear strike against the Russian Federation, such as a nuclear submarine with ICBMs coming, the commander ran to the post and gives the command to launch ICBMs across the Russian Federation! The team opened the mine, he pressed the button and the ICBM flew. Just think what procedures have to go through to launch ICBMs and even for the Russian Federation, it’s not a trifle to poke into your pockets, I don’t know, let those who know say, but at least I have to give the order to the president and certainly not one ICBM with low-power charges, codes launch and more miles of procedures. And while these orders reach the nuclear submarine, in the Russian Federation, the troops also children will know everything from and to.

[Zeev Zeev]

Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

[Pacifist with AK]

I agree! But in the United States there is not so much shmal to shmalnut in Russia)))))))

[Zeev Zeev]

In the States, shmal is legal. There is enough.
But seriously, the use of a tactical vigorous loaf does not make sense in Russia without a strategic missile strike at the deployment areas of mobile missile systems and nuclear submarine bases.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

It is necessary to entertain people with at least something, otherwise it is boring for him to sit on isolation.

[sergo1914]

Why is the Foreign Ministry talking about this? Did the “button” move to them?

[vkd.dvk]

Quote: Civil

Yeah, we rally all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.

First of all, in such conditions, the Augean stables are cleaned, and you and others like you are loaded onto trucks with an excavator and driven away from the city.

[serg v stock]

Any coronovirus launched from the USA across Russia will receive its nuclear response.

[vkd.dvk]

Quote: sergo1914

Why is the Foreign Ministry talking about this? Did the “button” move to them?

Because only the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is officially entitled to speak with a foreigner.
Or does it not suit you? Then come on, I will lie for you, you will receive on the neck, and I will receive a salary.

[opuonmed]

the main thing is that it would not be just a political step, but on the present! in the world there are groups that the world’s owners like to read about themselves, such as a world government, even the EU talked about it and the USA are sitting! everything is not as clear as it seems from the outside! as long as there is nuclear weapons we somehow balance in this world! Do you think there in the Kremlin they do not want the ruble to be strong so that people in the Russian Federation live well, but how to do it in such a world where you have to trade and buy with enemies! it is possible but the borders will be closed and there will again be a scoop or it takes time for people to come there and watch the general picture of the world, not about the country, but about the future of humanity in general! until the elites, both ours and theirs, understand this and sit down to solve problems, we will be on the verge of the collapse of humanity! they wanted to change the constitution for the better, but here the virus and the country are not without a monster, there are deputies and ministers, some of them are doing everything so that their sons receive their education without seeing the future in the Russian Federation, but we will pass it as long as we have a reason for the war and we will live from the fall to growth in the economy) although maybe Putin was put above us over the people to do such things and part of the income was paid there as the Cold War losers pay tribute)))) the very essence is that until humanity becomes depleted we will bite between themselves ! and while we do not set the goal to populate the solar system)))))))))

[vkd.dvk]

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

And why in Germany and Norway do penguins keep tactical nuclear bombs and train Germans, French, Norwegians to bomb these pieces of iron? Is Iran really? Or Korea? You need to have brains, you won’t want to write stupidity.

[Lekz]

A fertile topic for conversation. Everything is easier, Masha chewed for the gifted. Any ballistic missile (of any launch) is interpreted by the early warning system as a missile attack and will cock the missile defense and strategic missile forces to the highest degree of readiness. The "beauty" of launches of ballistic missiles from submarines is that the flight time is too short to find out the goals of the launch via the "hot" line, so the answer will be "regular" - megatons. With the sober mind of the attacker (and the end of the attack), she will have the opportunity to boast of the economy of fissile matter.

[shonsu]

Absolutely correct answer. And most importantly on time. Not TO plans and developments, and when the submarines are ALREADY equipped. That is, the grandmas have already been spent, and we are leveling out a lesser threat with the same means! And no need to splurge. In my opinion, the Americans outwitted themselves.

[Zementbomber]

Pentagon leadership promotes W76-2 tactical nuclear warheads for equipping ICBMs of American submarines.

Actually - W76-2 - quite a strategic YABCH. This igruha was invented (and creatively embodied) by an "Englishwoman" (who "shits" ) about 20 years ago, within the framework of the mega-epic concept of "substrategic nuclear strike" (the dreams of the late "Iron Margaret" about Cordoba - welcome everyone!).
Well and yes - who did it pulnul - SPRN still horseradish will determine.

[Evil 55]

Well, that's right .. Just words, even by a Foreign Ministry spokesman, are not encouraging enough .. How is it, to shoot a "nuclear loaf" at your property behind a sea puddle ..

[Lieutenant Ivolgin]

This is what Zakharova said, this is her opinion. And the GDP and the oligarchs have a different opinion, they have all their honestly earned fortune in assets, securities, dollars, and real estate. Where is it all? That's right, beyond the distant lands, in the kingdom of Kascheev. He already answered once when the Kursk was torpedoed by an American submarine. Maybe someone will say the times have changed? No, it's just that the prices for lies have changed, now they will cost more. GDP will say that something went wrong with them and an unplanned rocket launch took place. And then Zakharova will change his opinion, Solovyov will pick up, Shoigu will speak, well, etc., according to an already worked out scenario. And who does not agree, the regime of self-isolation.

[Gennady Fomkin]

Norwegian rocket incident - an incident that occurred on January 25, 1995, when a Norwegian-American team of scientists from the Annoya rocket range located on the island of the same name off the northeast coast of Norway launched a four-stage research rocket Black Brant XII. The rocket carried scientific equipment for the study of auroras and went north along a high ballistic trajectory [1], reaching the height of 1453 km at the apogee. Within minutes, as the rocket entered the ballistic trajectory, the SPRN means allowed to establish that the rocket was moving away from the Russian territory and does not pose a threat. Observation of it continued until the landing near Svalbard 24 minutes after launch



Now think - what if the rocket were approaching Russian territory (flying towards Belarus - it means approaching Russia)? For Russia, this would mean the beginning of the war: The launch of a single missile along a high ballistic trajectory from the Norwegian Sea corresponded to one of the alleged scenarios of a sudden nuclear attack against Russia. The Russian command had information about US military research in order to develop a special nuclear charge that creates a super-powerful electromagnetic pulse. Undermining such a charge at high altitude would ensure the incapacitation of radars, communication systems and other electronics over a vast territory, which would then allow a massive nuclear strike against Russia without fear of retaliation. They don’t joke with such things! And Zakharova is not joking. Unfortunately.

[Gennady Fomkin]

And then there’s a bunch of fucking demagogues, virtually representing how to merge an elephant with an wasp

[NordUral]

Flexible and slippery, it’s time to get used to our inflexibility a long time ago.

[Brigadier]

The Americans are fools, or simply mental degenerates ...

[Yury Siritsky]

Really these idiots so want to fight and even dream of surviving in this war.

[Neim xxx]

Why actually only from the submarine ?? In general, any launch should be regarded as a nuclear attack.

[COLORADO73]

Zakharova is trying to make a hype on American submarines! US submarines are powerful and can afford new warheads!

[ism_ek]

Dear editors! Correct the title. You do not correctly interpret the words of Mrs. Zakharova. A single launch of an ICBM towards the enemy cannot be regarded as a pretext for a retaliatory nuclear strike.

[DDT]

Here’s what makes me personally happy, for example, is the fact that our Masha is both longer and more full-bodied and even more porous than any dog ​​there from the Washington commissars ... Which convincingly proves that on the threshold of International Workers' Day, our pratium and the government are leading us on the right path
And for this you can already roll, the benefit is already in the evening, but unfortunately there is nothing more to do ...

[Charik]

I don’t understand something, where did some of my comments with the photos go, and what kind of cloning of the articles is such a photo of a nuclear submarine, is there another photo of a nuclear submarine in an article-clone?

[Charik]

O-O-O already in both articles the photo of the submarine is the same, yesterday a completely different photo of the submarine was

[Most kind]

In Syria, everyone who flies illegally has already been shot down, now we’ll drown everyone, then we will pay everyone according to a Kansas court decision and hereinafter

[Charik]

I go to the news section, right next to Haftar — this article is about the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a full-length photo of the Ohio submarine, I press-the entrance to the article-crap photo from the nose to the cabin, and yesterday there was a full-length photo of the Ohio submarine, they edit that And with editing and comments, some disappeared.

[Chaldon48]

I wonder what percentage in the US command of people with inadequate psyche

[napalm]

What perverted thinking. We will beat you a little with a small nuclear baton and win. Don’t touch your big one, otherwise it’s not right.

[Radical]

MFA: Launching any ICBM from the US nuclear submarine in Russia will be regarded as a nuclear attack

If anyone has analyzed this headline, they should understand that butter turns out to be oily, sugar is sweet, and salt is salty! Since the existence of nuclear missile weapons and early warning systems, this has been obvious! The performer of "Kalinka" is not aware of this? They will recruit you to...the Foreign Ministry, by...connection! Crap!

[Old26]

Quote: dvina71

Quote: Zaurbek

Mediterranean Sea, North, Pacific Ocean + aviation from bases

And where will their axes get to? This time .. Two .. how soon will the nuclear warhead arrive in the area of ​​dense concentration of Kr carriers?

From the Mediterranean to the missile bases the word is not enough. Maximum - Southern Military District. From the Northern - only to the PR of the Rezhitsa division. From the Pacific Ocean to the missile bases the word will not reach you at all. Perhaps only in the places where the boats are based.. But do not forget that at maximum range they will “saw” for about two hours at subsonic speed

Quote: Knights Templar

Let’s say an American nuclear submarine launches an ICBM during an exercise, can this event be considered a nuclear attack, followed by an appropriate response?

Firstly, training launches are negotiated at the state level. If an SLBM or ICBM is launched without notifying the other side, but the launch is the only one, then first there is communication through the leadership line, and if it is an accidental launch or a launch not authorized by the leadership, destruction occurs. Or as a result of self-destruction or may be shot down

Quote: strannik1985

If an ICBM flies towards the Russian Federation? Certainly. Therefore, training launches are not directed towards a potential enemy.

What are you saying, namesake? Not heading towards the enemy? That is, if our ICBM flies from the PR, for example, the 13th division to the Kura training ground, then it is not in the direction of the United States? Are they sure that the BG will fall in Kamchatka, and will not fly a couple of thousand kilometers and will not skid along the west coast of the USA, Alaska or Hawaii? Or if the Chinese conduct test launches of SLBMs in the Lop Nor region, then what, the missile will not go towards Russia?

Quote: dvina71

Quote: Knights Templar

if off the coast of Russia, but not in our direction, and if not from a nuclear submarine, but from a ship or plane? Zakharova did not say anything about this.

How about understanding the context of the situation yourself...not...? What doesn't allow it?
We are talking about small ships aboard the US submarine. The Americans believe that a small missile is not nuclear. Our people clarify that they don’t care... we won’t understand the types of crap... wait for a full answer.

Gennady! let's go to the source. Namely, to the article “Federation of American Scientists” (time of publication - approximately 2015-2017). By the way, it was not the American military that proposed to rely on such low-power warheads, but American scientists.
Initially, even these scientists did not emphasize that this was a weapon against Russia. Because they were well aware that no matter how powerful the nuclear explosion of such a warhead on Russian territory was, the blow would not be delivered by 5-kt warheads. The use of such a low power BG is primarily intended to minimize the damage from such a surgical strike. A kind of version of “philanthropy”. Hitting the object should cause minimal damage. For in the future, after such a strike, it was planned to introduce their troops into this territory. This is impossible in principle against Russia. But to carry out a series of such surgical strikes on the infrastructure of another country (I hope you understand that the enemy of the United States can be not only Russia).
Now imagine that you need to disable such a country, well, for example, a certain Nebuchadnezzar. Which does not have nuclear or missile weapons, but sits “on oil” (or controls the routes of ships. And you need to disable it with minimal damage. Neutralize the infrastructure (preferably not 100%, but making it inoperable), and then be able to quickly restore these objects.
And such a charge strikes, well, for example, a power plant that powers oil mines, refineries, pumping stations, and the like. A strike by a 5 kt warhead on a station will disable it, although it may not destroy it completely (the CEP is still 120 meters), but it will put it out of action. In this case, even the town of power engineers will be outside the strike zone. The occupation authorities will not have to restore the plant, which has been turned into a glassy mass.
But our media immediately found in these warheads a “global threat to Russia.” Although it is not yet clear how (or whether) the aerodynamics of such a head have changed. And what will be her QUO? In addition, you should not think that they will convert all their warheads from W-76-1 to W-76-2. The boat will carry 2 missiles with 1-2 such warheads...

Quote: Avior

Not really
There are few such missiles with weakened charges, and their use is uniquely spelled out in the US nuclear strategy, adopted a couple of years ago.
It says that if an adversary inflicts a nuclear strike with a tactical nuclear charge in a conventional war, these missiles are designed for a strictly metered retaliatory strike

Or for a country that does not have nuclear weapons, or has an insignificant arsenal

Quote: vkd.dvk

Quote: Zeev Zeev

Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

And why in Germany and Norway do penguins keep tactical nuclear bombs and train Germans, French, Norwegians to bomb these pieces of iron? Is Iran really? Or Korea? You need to have brains, you won’t want to write stupidity.

Just in case. It is unknown who will be NATO's enemy at what point in time. Maybe Russia, maybe Iran. Not predictable. And no one will keep their bombs within reach of the enemy. That is why the Americans, according to some sources, took their bombs from Turkey to Romania.
By the way, the Americans have never kept their nuclear weapons in Norway. And there is no need to teach them to the French. In France OWN there are nuclear weapons.

Quote: Zementbomber

Pentagon leadership promotes W76-2 tactical nuclear warheads for equipping ICBMs of American submarines.

Actually - W76-2 - quite a strategic YABCH. This igruha was invented (and creatively embodied) by an "Englishwoman" (who "shits" ) about 20 years ago, within the framework of the mega-epic concept of "substrategic nuclear strike" (the dreams of the late "Iron Margaret" about Cordoba - welcome everyone!).

Warheads are divided into strategic and tactical not only by power (and not so much by power), but by the tasks they perform. And there is such a mess there that it is difficult to sort it out.
The W-70 warhead for the Lance missile, the W-52 warhead for the Sergeant missile (the first is 100 kt, the second is 200 kt) are tactical (mounted on tactical missiles), and the W-76 with a power of 100 kt, mounted on an SLBM, is strategic. But the 5-kt W-76-2 with a power of 5 kt cannot be called strategic.

Quote: Zementbomber

Well and yes - who did it pulnul - SPRN still horseradish will determine.

Oh really? Have you ever heard of such a term - trajectory extension? So they will determine the characteristics of the SLBM (whose it is) and where it flies too

[aiden]

What if it was launched from an airplane or the ground?

[petrol cutter]

“Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, which will immediately be followed by an appropriate response. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.”
What a twist!...
How long ago did the Foreign Ministry come up with this idea?
I came to this idea about twenty years ago. Why don’t I get paid as an analyst at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs?!.. I would like to understand!...
I still have a lot of good thoughts!...

[lvov_aleksey]

Quote: Dead Day

Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, to which an appropriate response will immediately follow. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.

against the background of the fight against coronovirus, this is no longer scary ...

never talk nonsense, grow up first!!! In our country, more than 20 - 30 thousand people die in road accidents per year, for some reason you weren’t worried about illnesses before (cancer, stroke, diabetes, etc.)
How many people died from the tube in 2019?
https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/news/2020/03/24/13577-rossiya-demonstriruet-odin-iz-samyh-znachitelnyh-tempov-snizheniya-zabolevaemosti-i-smertnosti-ot-tuberkuleza-v-mire

[Charik]

Price Fear - has anyone seen this movie - this is my first time watching it

[Old26]

Quote: Military77

The mattresses are full of opa with plutonium initiators of the TC charge. They must be of very high purity, without impurity of decomposition products, the service life of the initiator is 20-30 years. The last plant for the production of initiators was closed in 1991, so they make "on the knee" from 150KT TN BGs, just nuclear 5-8KT

Is it already forbidden by religion to carry out a set of cleanup measures? Yes, they don’t make new “pits” now. They plan to start around 2030, but annually about 300 charges undergo modernization and a life extension cycle. And they not only convert 100 kt (and not 150 kt) charges into 5-7 kt, but also modernize others, without changing the power. And they plan to make about 76-2 W-50-60 charges, no more. So you shouldn’t hope that the Americans will convert all their warheads into low-power ones

Quote: Charik

Price Fear - has anyone seen this movie - this is my first time watching it

Is this about Jack Ryan? The film is famous, although it is almost 20 years old. Based on Clancy's novel "All the Fears in the World." And in general, this series about Jack Ryan is very good. Some of the novels in this series have been filmed

[Vlad 67]

Quote: Thunderbolt

You have already developed a counteraction plan, which is so valiant /// 3 minutes after the public article /// you published a counteraction plan.

Quote: Herrr

According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war

We managed to repulse it, but no, with a missile-oncoming one ....... and meanwhile .... my purely amateurish opinion ----- a war, for example, in the Baltic States will be fought until the usual means of defense are exhausted, but then the RF will have to inflict a series of tactical poison strikes deep into the tactical depth of the NATO front so as not to hurt itself.

No war will ever be waged either in the Baltic states or for the Baltic states with anyone. If necessary, the sprat territory will simply be passed in marching mode. Most likely without firing a single shot. I would venture to suggest that in this situation, even for Poland, from the NATO member countries, there are unlikely to be many intercessors, and even then the maximum is to yap from across the English Channel)))

[meandr51]

The United States can use atomic bombs on the Baltic states in the event of our invasion (provoked, of course) on their territory. Our answer?

[Protos]

The Stars and Stripes are testing the waters!

[meandr51]

What if it’s not an ICBM, but a tactical A-bomb from an F-35?

[clidon]

No one will launch nuclear missiles because of single “pseudo-tactical” launches. And overseas they understand this.

[Charik]

Shame on the picker. I don’t care about the cons. I know that people will look, look at what the “agent of the West” Ovalny said about Zakhara.