MFA: Launching any ICBM from the US nuclear submarine in Russia will be regarded as a nuclear attack


Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, to which an appropriate response will immediately follow. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.


Spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, speaking at a briefing, commented on a publication posted on the website of the US State Department about low-power nuclear charges and equipping them with ballistic missile submarines. According to her, “amateurs to speculate” about the flexibility of the American nuclear potential, it must be remembered that according to the Russian military doctrine, any ICBM launched towards Russia is the basis for a nuclear response.

Any attack using an American ballistic missile submarine (SLBM), regardless of the characteristics of its equipment, will be perceived as a nuclear attack weapons

- she said.

Earlier it was reported that the Pentagon leadership is promoting a program to equip ICBMs of American submarines with tactical nuclear warheads W76-2. According to the U.S. military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

256 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Errr April 29 2020 18: 37 New
    • 68
    • 7
    +61
    According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
    Yeah, schaz! laughing
    1. Grandfather April 29 2020 18: 53 New
      • 17
      • 59
      -42
      Any launch of a ballistic missile from an American submarine towards Russia, regardless of its characteristics, will be regarded as a nuclear attack, to which an appropriate response will immediately follow. This statement was made by the Russian Foreign Ministry.
      against the background of the fight against coronovirus, this is no longer scary ...
      1. Civil April 29 2020 20: 20 New
        • 39
        • 105
        -66
        Yeah, we rally all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.
        1. Malyuta April 29 2020 20: 51 New
          • 28
          • 50
          -22
          Quote: Civil
          says emphatically no gang of overseas oligarchs.

          She speaks, speaks and speaks, only no one except for here, no one hears, and there she expresses concern.
          All this leads to terrible thoughts, but whose is it all the same dumb ?! belay
          1. venik April 29 2020 21: 48 New
            • 17
            • 11
            +6
            Quote: Malyuta
            She speaks, speaks and speaks, only no one except for here, no one hears, and there she expresses concern.

            =========
            Dear Skuratov! And you are the statements and "concerns" of the US State Department, "except here"hear often ??? wassat
            1. Malyuta April 29 2020 21: 51 New
              • 22
              • 37
              -15
              Quote: venik
              Dear Skuratov! And you statements and "concerns" of the US State Department, "except here" often hear ???

              Thank you for your kind words, Dear Vladimir! Unfortunately or fortunately, I do not listen to Solovyov at all! repeat
              1. venik April 29 2020 22: 45 New
                • 17
                • 8
                +9
                Quote: Malyuta
                Unfortunately or fortunately, I do not listen to Solovyov at all!

                ========
                And what? "nightingales" has already moved to the State Department? What a news! And say - "I'm not listening"..... wink
          2. To be or not to be April 29 2020 22: 43 New
            • 26
            • 3
            +23
            One diplomat said: "In our circles they say, the word is not a sparrow. Fly out, fly out!"
            So there is reason to react so sharply to the armament of the US nuclear submarines with new nuclear weapons .. The Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement is not in itself .. And the process is based on the data of many services and the decisions of the leaders .. That’s not the case.
            1. To be or not to be April 29 2020 22: 54 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              for example, here’s an article on how both sides play war games .. "Russian and US bombers tried on the launch areas of their missiles
              0155AnalyticsToday, 19:21

              "The bombers of Russia and the United States tried on the launch areas of their missiles"
              https://tehnowar.ru/148450-Bombardirovschiki-Rossii-i-SShA-primerilisy-k-rayonam-puska-svoih-raket.html
          3. shonsu April 30 2020 00: 41 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            This is not our problem. If they don’t hear, then let them try. )))
            1. avg
              avg April 30 2020 13: 07 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              This is not our problem. If they don’t hear, then let them try. )))

              They will hear, even as they hear. Everyone who is supposed to and will hear and draw conclusions, even if they first show off for force. yes
        2. flicker April 30 2020 20: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          The American military waves its nuclear club at the entire international community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela.

          And what Israel did not mention wink , or do they not belong to "progressive" countries?
        3. Vlad 67 1 May 2020 03: 05 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          mistakenly put a plus instead of a minus, sorry - this is inadvertent) ...
          rally around whoever is needed and answer in full size, mattresses - first of all, do not hesitate)))!
        4. DMB_95 1 May 2020 12: 36 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Civil
          ..unit all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.

          Absolutely true, moderately emotional statement. That's just the "EP party", apparently, out of habit of the honored political worker mentioned. Do not fall for trifles, citizen.
    2. Mabius April 29 2020 19: 05 New
      • 29
      • 11
      +18
      Quote: Herrr
      According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
      Yeah, schaz! laughing

      They all hope to bleed someone first and when they start to drown in blood, then soak both participants ..!
      The tactics are well-known, back in 1945 they had such a plan (to bomb the USSR) .. But Stalin, with his restraint, cooled them down sharply ... Well, the Army was wicked and trained .. Well, thank God then it suffered, and then the losses even more were .. Although in vain, it would be necessary to go to the English Channel soldier
      1. Roman1970_1 April 29 2020 19: 46 New
        • 11
        • 17
        -6
        back in 1945 their plan was like this (to bomb the USSR) .. But Stalin, with his restraint, cooled them sharply ...


        Yes, yes I remember there was such a Mabius, the chief adviser. And he advised the Americans and Stalin.
        Therefore, today he shares with us the plans of those times.
    3. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 19: 33 New
      • 6
      • 38
      -32
      You have already developed a counteraction plan, which is so valiant /// 3 minutes after the public article /// you published a counteraction plan.
      Quote: Herrr
      According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war
      We managed to repulse it, but no, with a missile-oncoming one ....... and meanwhile .... my purely amateurish opinion ----- a war, for example, in the Baltic States will be fought until the usual means of defense are exhausted, but then the RF will have to inflict a series of tactical poison strikes deep into the tactical depth of the NATO front so as not to hurt itself.
      1. The popuas April 29 2020 20: 23 New
        • 37
        • 3
        +34
        It is written in Russian ... any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia smile where does the Baltic states request
        1. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 20: 50 New
          • 10
          • 39
          -29
          Quote: Popuas
          It is written in Russian ... any ICBMs from a submarine towards Russia, and here the Baltic states
          Reply

          And what are we discussing here? ”ZaHarovinson declared that we would answer, as it is written in a golden word in the motto of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces. panic?
          1. The popuas April 29 2020 21: 20 New
            • 14
            • 3
            +11
            Why are the Baltic states dragged what maybe because of this minus ... request because of it they will not be vigorous at throwing bread at each other, for geldings this will be an occasion, but they haven’t gone anywhere in Russia wink
            1. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 22: 08 New
              • 5
              • 29
              -24
              Quote: Popuas
              Why are the Baltic states dragged

              Then, that this is the immediate and desired goal ---- to bring down Belarus and make a march along the roads in the style of a Manshtein's sickle. It is not clear why now about
              they recall that in the Russian Charter of the Strategic Missile Forces the periods of danger and the degree of these periods are clearly and with an arrangement. I sailed to the Baltic states so that you would recognize the infringement of Kal.obr. Communism. In the midst of ruins and handfuls, as always, otherwise it doesn’t happen, the Russian Vanya came burrowed. And began to wage a non-European war. When instead of a departure ----- a counterattack, the Russian infantry departs and is fixed on the positions for what ....? Halder from the very June, very strongly began to perceive at Russian counterattacks.
              1. blackice April 30 2020 02: 39 New
                • 5
                • 2
                +3
                And I sailed to the Baltic states so that you would recognize the infringement of Kal.obr. Under the crossfire of NATO artillery, in the midst of dashing gangs agitating for Communism. Among the ruins and handfuls, as always, otherwise it doesn’t happen, the Russian Vanya came buried

                Eva how you citizen suffered !!!!
                Note, if the stripes are so steep, so why didn’t they drive the Afghans through the cracks with their artillery?
                Ahhh, yeah !!!!
                Mountains there all sorts of spirits help, hiding them in the terrain.
                So now, NATO will not have a blitzkrieg in Russia. It’s not in the desert of Saddammites to burn airplanes.
                As for the Baltic states, then who did it rest against at all? The “proud” Balts are only yelling about the Russian threat in order to at least somehow show that they are there, otherwise they will forget about these proud peoples and what then to do? Neither money from the striped breadwinner, nor fame to you. So either die out, or again have to be friends with a neighbor. And to be friends with a neighbor is not at all for pride, for pride will be infringed.
          2. venik April 29 2020 21: 59 New
            • 19
            • 7
            +12
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            AU, minuscule --- what Zakharova brought new to the Russian Strategic Missile Forces strategy

            ========
            And why should she “upgrade” something into the Strategic Missile Forces strategy? She, tea - does not serve at the General Staff, but works at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs! And he does his work fine - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends" and "bosom enemies" - that’s brings!
            Hello everyone! negative
            1. Thunderbolt April 30 2020 00: 24 New
              • 3
              • 17
              -14
              Quote: venik
              It does its job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - it brings it!
              Hello everyone!
              Our breadbasket of golden wheat ears of wheat, mine, our Ukrainian, was never in the sapper’s platoon, everyone went ahead, and the sappers were sharply counterattacked by the Soviet intelligence service. posthumous awards were no less than the Chuvashs and Ukrainians Under Fastov, Radomyshl and Zhytomyr, exclusively Ivanes Ivanovich Ivanovs fought, and Mikols at that time only fought against the Red Army. So they want to comb us, because a cut between all sorts of Gazprom and Naftogaz. But, the Soviet people remember sacredly that, through the Dnieper, the first car = a tank opened fire from the porch, it was found. They tried to unfold in the area, but were shackled by attack aircraft and the resistance of the Soviet infantry. A piercing German defense was struck south. And the crews of the leading tanks were not Muscovites, Kokoliki and Tatars, but mixed crews Ms. = Soviet.
              1. venik April 30 2020 00: 50 New
                • 7
                • 1
                +6
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                Our breadbasket of golden ears of wheat

                =========
                And WHAT, let me ask about this "prosperous opus" with "twists" towards the "national question"? And what is it actually related to the quoted phrase:
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                It does its job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - it brings it!

                And WHAT is the “deep connection” here?
                No, of course, if you accept all of these "breadbasket of golden ears","found a weak spot"," with, exclusively Ivana Ivanovich Ivanovs fought, and Mikols at that time only fought against the Red Army "and other other" pearls "of your opus as a result of"profuse libation"- everything is clear! There are NO questions !!! Otherwise, NOTHING is clear ... And even vague suspicions creep in relevance subject ....
                Therefore, I do not even ask to “decipher” such “deep thoughts”! (in this state it is probably difficult to do) ....
                1. Siberian54 April 30 2020 03: 29 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Kolos, is this something of Nazism?
            2. Thunderbolt April 30 2020 00: 39 New
              • 5
              • 13
              -8
              Quote: venik
              It does its job perfectly - what needs to be brought to the attention of "sworn friends", and "bosom enemies" - it brings it!
              Hello everyone!

              But why does it bring such a special thing, or before did NATO strategists not know that you can’t go to Russia since it’s parity nuclear? Mnouovschiki, enlighten what Zakharova said, which NATO did not know about!
              1. venik April 30 2020 10: 03 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                Why does it bring such a special thing or before NATO strategists did not know

                =========
                SPECIAL does not bring anything! Besides the fact that in spite of all these newfangled American doctrines of "limited" and "tactical" "preventive" strike, there is NOTHING in our doctrine not changed and “if that” - we will answer immediately and “in full”, i.e. as in the old joke: "beat not on the passport, but immediately on the face"!
                Why is there something incomprehensible? request
                And also you are surprised: "Why are they" minus "?"
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. Malyuta April 29 2020 20: 52 New
          • 16
          • 3
          +13
          Quote: Popuas
          . Any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia

          But what was it when it was different ???
        3. venik April 29 2020 21: 53 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Quote: Popuas
          It is written in Russian ... any ICBM from a submarine towards Russia smile where does the Baltic states request

          ========
          And the respected Stormbreaker probably thinks that in the Baltic States American nuclear submarines with ICBMs are floating ..... laughing
          1. The popuas April 29 2020 22: 35 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            C-isolation lol in May what starts ... uhhh wassat
            1. venik April 29 2020 22: 57 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Quote: Popuas
              C-isolation lol in May what starts ... uhhh wassat

              ==========
              Why wait then? Our people, oh, how inventive! In connection with the problems of "figure out for three" during the "quarantine" they thought of plumping on Skype or Viber (in the "video conferencing" mode) !!! wassat lol
              PS No! SUCH people - UNBEATABLE !!! drinks
        4. Bratkov Oleg April 29 2020 22: 18 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Quote: Popuas
          ... and here the Baltic states ...

          The Baltic States are the center of world civilization, which is even more important than Ukraine.
          Oooo ... how great they are!
        5. Charik April 29 2020 22: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Does any ICBM carry a bullseye or is it a dummy ride?
        6. Thunderbolt April 30 2020 02: 02 New
          • 3
          • 8
          -5
          Quote: Popuas
          It is written in Russian ... any ICBMs from a submarine towards Russia, and here the Baltic states

          And you are such a cool analyst that you’re blown away by the icteric article, and you pop up with the right bubble. Moreover, tactical and technical data are used in every second article on this resource. The Baltic countries are the closest light to Leningrad .. I drove through the highway from “them” in to our Peter. Do you think that lightweight brigades of the USA from Prague are invented by NARVU? You generally think that the Americans concentrated eight of their barrels. However, when NATO conducted exercises on the neutral island of Gotland, then NATO will not get out from there, there he's overlapping with P tries to control the Baltic by the Baltic.
          So what do we have ----- the silly USSR, which had the entire southern coast of the Baltic Sea and to the straits, numerous MRA forces and missile strike from the sea.
          Now everything is much better. The more the potential of the armored vehicles of Poland and its allies increases, the happier the patriots rub their hands. Well, good luck! Previously, we had to deploy an appropriate district structure against the NATO army corps, but these are backward Soviet ones. Now, there are Iskanders under the command of the command district ... Kaliningrad Ure is clearly not suitable for them. Another evidence that the war / fleeting conflict with far-reaching prospects / will be waged by conventional weapons, but after forces, the parties will fix the border line. This is taught by the logic of antiaircraft defense against NATO ... Correct, if I missed it, maybe we have less TA or bombing forces. NATO. are aimed at our cities. No one will beat with a mace. Until the ground group is exhausted, strategists are only in standby mode
          1. The popuas April 30 2020 03: 20 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            This is an article about ICBMs in the direction of Russia, and not about strikers breaking through the defense of Kaliningrad! Do you think that if tactical Yao will be beaten in Kaliningrad, our people will not answer request
      2. Lekz April 29 2020 23: 32 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Merry you, however. This is how English and French soldiers are seen heroically dying for the independence of the tribalt.
    4. Olgovich April 29 2020 19: 34 New
      • 7
      • 9
      -2
      Quote: Herrr
      According to US military the use of tactical charges will allow you to win in conflicts with a potential enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
      Yeah, schaz! laughing

      because of these tebils Doomsday Clock (Doomsday Clock) and show 23h 58 min -2 minutes before the apocalypse, the smallest time since 1947 ...

      -Even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...
      1. kit88 April 29 2020 20: 41 New
        • 28
        • 3
        +25
        Who needs this watch and what exactly do they show?
        Why exactly 23:58, not 15:39?
        In 30 years they will show 23:59:45, and in forty 23: 59: 59: 23? And so, until the second coming, the arrows will move - the people are nightmare.
        One fool invented, others repeat.
        1. Olgovich April 29 2020 22: 07 New
          • 1
          • 19
          -18
          Quote: kit88
          Who needs this watch and what exactly do they show?
          Why exactly 23: 58, but not 15:39?
          In 30 years they will show 23:59:45, and in forty 23: 59: 59: 23? And so, until the second coming, the arrows will move - the people are nightmare.
          One invented a fool, others repeat.

          Turk is one that does not understand - very simple and visual things.
          Quote: kit88
          In 30 years they will show 23:59:45and after forty 23: 59: 59: 23?

          belay fool lol
          in 1949 it was. eg. 23.57. and in 196023.47, in 199123.41 .

          WHAT can be incomprehensible here?
          1. Nyrobsky April 29 2020 22: 46 New
            • 10
            • 2
            +8
            Quote: Olgovich
            in 1949 it was. eg. 23.57. and in 1960 - 23.47, in 1991 - 23.41.
            WHAT can be incomprehensible here?
            Bullshit is all Andrew. As for me, if the mattresses had confidence that they could crush Russia with the means at their disposal with impunity, then this watch went ahead of the calendar rule and already tapped the new era of American planetary colonialism, but since Russia has weapons that are not available for interception and counteraction, the clock shows the countdown. These devils have so much confidence in their exceptionalism that they think that time is subject to them, but most likely time will show that the watchmaker who repairs the watch does not live in the United States.
      2. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 20: 52 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Olgovich
        -Even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...

        And how much was in the car crisis, tell me
        1. venik April 29 2020 22: 13 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          And how much was in the car crisis, tell me

          ========
          23.53 (i.e., "without 7 minutes"!). True, you should make a reservation: The Caribbean crisis resolved very quickly (within 38 days), the clock did not have time to respond, and their readings did not change.
          In total, starting in 1947, they “translated” them only 25 times!
      3. sniperino April 29 2020 20: 57 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Olgovich
        because of these morons Doomsday Clock and show 23h 58 min
        It is unlikely that any causal relationship can be traced here. The block that synchronizes these and a number of other related events is somewhere else. A watch is not a reflection of the situation, but the same means of information and psychological impact, like local hypochondriacs with depressants, as statements by generals, are only much more powerful because of their symbolism and wider in reach of the audience.
        1. Malyuta April 29 2020 22: 16 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          Quote: sniperino
          A watch is not a reflection of the situation, but the same means of information and psychological impact, like local hypochondriacs with depressants, as statements by generals, are only much more powerful because of their symbolism and wider in reach of the audience.

          Very cool said, sorry for the quotes will not fly apart.
        2. venik April 29 2020 22: 17 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: sniperino
          It is unlikely that any causal relationship can be traced here. The block that synchronizes these and a number of other related events is somewhere else.

          =========
          Doomsday Clock is a project of the University of Chicago magazine's Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, launched in 1947 by the creators of the first American atomic bomb.
          The time left until midnight symbolizes the tension in the international situation and progress in the development of nuclear weapons. Midnight itself symbolizes the moment of a nuclear cataclysm.
          The decision to transfer arrows is made by the journal’s board of directors with the help of invited experts, including, in particular, 18 Nobel Prize winners.
          Over the 70-year history of the project, the hands of the Clock have changed their position 25 times.
          Doomsday Clock

          1. sniperino April 29 2020 22: 41 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            Quote: venik
            The decision to transfer arrows is made by the journal’s board of directors with the help of invited experts, including, in particular, 18 Nobel Prize winners.
            And who makes the decision to gather experts? In addition, the creators of nuclear weapons and other laureates are not necessarily competent in the military-political situation, the goals of politicians and the plans of the general staff, but they themselves are brewed in some kind of information broth.
            1. sniperino April 29 2020 23: 20 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: sniperino
              And who decides on the collection of experts
              The board of directors is a few people. Are they independent too?
      4. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 23: 18 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Olgovich
        even in the Caribbean crisis was a little more ...

        The Caribbean crisis is not worn right now, now they prefer the unhai noir with shades of gray ..
    5. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 22: 30 New
      • 3
      • 10
      -7
      The money will go to the rescue of travel agencies, they provide jobs and Pepsi for Coca, beer corners are also in sorrow, in short, all foreign brands that provide an influx of currency in the form of percentage of speculative transactions. This is all the riffraffers that promise drug support. It’s not morning yet, but fresh ..
    6. Zoldat_A April 30 2020 10: 46 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Herrr
      According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
      Yeah, schaz! laughing

      The American military charter says that if resistance is tactically useless and life-threatening, then you need to surrender.
      In captivity, we must behave calmly, without causing aggression on the part of the captors, to answer us ALL questions, so as not to cause a threat to my life (I do not recall anything like that in the Soviet Combat Charter).

      Just like in our exercises ....
      But on our teachings - OWN, not enemies. And there’s a way to talk to the enemy - at least one sadistic pathologist in a platoon is always there.

      Same thing globally - A retaliatory strike is considered unacceptable, which can destroy up to 13% of the population and up to 20% of infrastructure. Namely, such an answer, according to the miscalculations of Pentagon analysts, can be brought by Russia.

      Therefore, in the event of a global nuclear conflict, American hopes could not be substituted for Europe, and they would not be able to sit for the Big Puddle in the light of the GDP statement that "the blows will be delivered at decision centers."

      Hence the moral - we will defend ourselves (and there is something) until the global destruction of the "decision center".
      I don’t think that staunch Americans, only in Hollywood, “saving the world”, but in reality fighting “to the first blood” (like boys at school) are barking at a nuclear conflict with Russia.


      PS Information about the "stingy Americans" fighting "to the first blood" - from my father, who saw American special forces nearby in different parts of the globe. He fought full contact with them, his friends whom I know fought ... They fall to the ground with a broken harem and bangs with his right hand .... The vaunted "green berets" .... This is ours fighting for our country. And they - for the "green card", for the grant for training, for retirement ... And, in their opinion, for hell is all this dead?
      1. Errr April 30 2020 11: 08 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Eh, I’ve written off already ... And then after all, no Combat Charter would have been needed, it would have been enough only:
        ... and as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend her courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing your blood and life itself to achieve complete victory over enemies. soldier
        1. Zoldat_A April 30 2020 11: 18 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Herrr
          Eh, I’ve written off already ... And then after all, no Combat Charter would have been needed, it would have been enough only:
          ... and as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend her courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing your blood and life itself to achieve complete victory over enemies. soldier

          What is there to answer, only soldier drinks
          And another kiss of the Banner and the beret.
    7. Simargl April 30 2020 20: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Herrr
      Yeah, schaz!
      But why? Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq - they can bomb almost with impunity: in the UN, several countries will express concern.
      1. Errr 1 May 2020 04: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Simargl
        Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq - they can bomb almost with impunity: in the UN, several countries will express concern.
        And if the “concern” (in this case, “concern” is not a very suitable word) of the Russian Federation will not have a wide resonance at the UN, these will be the last days of the latter as a truly global [universal] organization. In this way, she will sign her own death sentence and will exactly repeat the fate of the League of Nations. Well, then, I hope you yourself know what happened ... hi
        1. Simargl 1 May 2020 05: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Herrr
          And if the "concern" of the Russian Federation ...
          I did not say anything about Russia separately:
          Quote: Simargl
          some countries will express concern
          1. Errr 1 May 2020 05: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Russia in this case simply cannot "not worry." She will certainly be among these very "few."
            1. Simargl 1 May 2020 05: 55 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              So what? You can take care of it in different ways: for a “tick” (if they bomb, say, Japan), or so that they sweat ...
              1. Errr 1 May 2020 07: 35 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Yes, it seems that they are not going to sweat (or steam) over the ocean at all, even if the Russian representative at the UN will be very indignant, because when struck with small "vigorous" charges outside the territory of the Russian Federation, the guaranteed response from the latter is guaranteed and will not follow. I think so.
                1. Simargl 2 May 2020 03: 34 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Initially, I replied that the use of nuclear weapons does not necessarily lead to a global war - it is enough to use it in a country that is not supported by a global player.
                  For Argentina, who will get involved? All. Expression oooh very deep concern.
                  1. Errr 2 May 2020 06: 24 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    If you build a chain of events more truly, you will see that any use of nuclear weapons invariably leads the world to a global nuclear war, because with the inevitable consequence of its local "moderate" application of the collapse of the global security system in the person of the UN (see my first answer to you yesterday), the only factor holding back this very global thermonuclear massacre is eliminated. I do not advise anyone to build illusions at the expense of its optionality. Always and from everything restrains only a psychological barrier. The introduction into the consciousness of only one thought about the possibility of using nuclear weapons will automatically remove the last obstacles to its routine use.
                    Everything here is not simple, but very elementary. Even a small series of local military operations with the use of nuclear weapons will very quickly develop into a global thermonuclear catastrophe. Too many problems have accumulated in most states and it is very tempting to solve them all in one fell swoop. With good intentions, the path is known to be paved.
                    1. Simargl 2 May 2020 17: 20 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Herrr
                      The introduction into the consciousness of only one thought about the possibility of using nuclear weapons will automatically remove the last obstacles to its routine use.
                      You, as I understand the misunderstanding about the power of nuclear weapons. Yes, strategic warheads — wunderwafers of some power (megatons of fuel cell) are tactical — they are relatively weak, and there are less than 1kt of fuel cell.
                      You can compare the bombing of Dresden and Hiorshima with Nagasaki
                      different way, one result.
                      1. Errr 3 May 2020 05: 10 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        It is possible to make a tactical charge even less than 0,02 kt TEQ (we don’t take into account the exotic stuffing like Cf-252, because it is extremely expensive), but this has nothing to do with the topic we are considering. We are here and now amicably discussing very specific W76-2s with an estimated explosion power of 5 kt TEQ.
                        With the captured pictures of the greatest tragedies, you suddenly pushed me to black humor:
                        Do you see radiation?
                        No.
                        That is OK. You will feel it soon. wink
                        Well, seriously, the difference between the consequences of a conventional bombing and nuclear bombing. You’ll excuse me for the bad manners, but my emotions go wild. hi
                      2. Simargl 4 May 2020 07: 46 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Herrr
                        Well, seriously, the difference between the consequences of a conventional bombing and nuclear bombing.
                        Have you looked at the photo? There is a difference?
                        Now, 20-100-500 bombers simply do not fly: they both get better, and targets are more accurately plotted on the maps.

                        Quote: Herrr
                        We are here and now amicably discussing very specific W76-2s with an estimated explosion power of 5 kt TEQ.
                        That's not a lot. especially in the concrete city.
                      3. Errr 4 May 2020 09: 32 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        And so you come to the understanding that
                        ... everyone will be given according to his faith. May it come true!
                        hi
                      4. Simargl 5 May 2020 07: 42 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Herrr
                        And so you come to the understanding that
                        ... everyone will be given according to his faith. May it come true!
                        hi
                        I would not want a war, nor man-made disasters, nor natural.
                        In the "stone jungle" you need a BoNba 1k times more powerful, for a comparable effect. The building of the chamber of commerce was almost exactly under the epicenter. But it is half-wooden. and by the way, where is the funnel in Hiroshima or Nagasaki?
                      5. Errr 5 May 2020 17: 02 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Simargl
                        and by the way, where is the funnel in Hiroshima or Nagasaki?
                        The Little Boy was powered at an altitude of 600 to 500 meters above the ground, and the Fat Man at an altitude of about 300 meters. During airborne nuclear explosions, no craters are formed at such altitudes.
                        On August 6th, in Hiroshima, more than 45 thousand people died immediately and almost as many later died from radiation sickness. In the event of a ground explosion, there would be much more casualties in view of the subsequent considerable radioactive contamination of the area. Therefore, I allow myself to repeat:
                        There is a huge difference between the consequences of conventional bombing and nuclear. This is not the same thing at all.
                      6. Simargl 5 May 2020 19: 51 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Herrr
                        During airborne nuclear explosions, no craters are formed at such altitudes.
                        And such capacities. Megaton and from 1 km will leave a funnel.
                        Quote: Herrr
                        70 thousand people died immediately and almost as many subsequently died from radiation sickness.
                        What is radiation sickness? And how much better is it to die from burns than from radiation sickness?

                        Quote: Herrr
                        In the event of a ground explosion, there would be much more casualties in view of the subsequent considerable radioactive contamination of the area.
                        Now nuclear weapons are much cleaner. The US is committed to developing just such clean charges. So that you can use the cleared area.

                        Quote: Herrr
                        Therefore, I allow myself to repeat:
                        Are we talking about the use of nuclear weapons in strategic or tactical, up to several ct, options? Are we talking about the modern use of high-precision bombs, or carpet bombing?
  • evgenii67 April 29 2020 18: 39 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.
    1. Prisoner April 29 2020 18: 52 New
      • 18
      • 2
      +16
      It does not seem to everyone. Therefore, some dull morons had to be reminded. hi
      1. Malyuta April 29 2020 20: 58 New
        • 13
        • 7
        +6
        Quote: Captive
        It does not seem to everyone. Therefore, some dull morons had to be reminded.

        Are you talking about those who keep money there, buy real estate and keep children with wives and lovers? It’s necessary to warn Alla Borisovna, otherwise it’s not an hour and she’s hooked, she’s good, she sang about harlequin and the ferryman.
        1. sniperino April 29 2020 22: 25 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Malyuta
          It’s necessary to warn Alla Borisovna, otherwise it’s not an hour and she’ll be hooked
          Will this elite, according to Brzezinski, prevent Russia from striking back? Not even funny.
          1. Malyuta April 29 2020 22: 29 New
            • 10
            • 8
            +2
            Quote: sniperino
            Will this elite, according to Brzezinski, prevent Russia from striking back? Not even funny.

            The elite allowed this clowness to be close to her overseas estates, so that she could entertain there, on the spot, without unnecessary troubles! But this is really not funny. hi
            1. sniperino April 29 2020 23: 06 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Malyuta
              elite allowed
              Someone allows something to Zelensky, but who can object to the commander in chief? Full name does he have? Certainly not Pugachev. If you write that the commander in chief will not answer, then he is hardly a copycat of Gaddafi, and his palaces were not found anywhere
    2. Mabius April 29 2020 19: 07 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: evgenii67
      What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

      They check the reaction, who and how will react .. hi
      1. Charik April 29 2020 19: 24 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, as they usually react, they will start shouting that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons.
        1. Mabius April 29 2020 20: 47 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Quote: Charik
          Yes, as they usually react, they will start shouting that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons.

          Well, everything is as usual .. But the main thing is that Russia has ceased to express "concern", and directly says "exceptional" what kind of reaction will be harsh to their provocation .. And it pleases! hi
          We do not want war, and most of all in the world we know that THIS IS SUCH!

          Stop and do not anger the Russians .. soldier
        2. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 21: 08 New
          • 6
          • 14
          -8
          Quote: evgenii67
          What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

          So I’m trying to convey to people that there is a Strategic Missile Forces BUVS, and no Zakharova is at any time in power when the steppe is like a prayer, but the service is like a battle. that they’re trying to isolate themselves from the problems of our armored personnel carrier, from all the machines of the “Armat” system, in the MiGar air without AFAR and Dry without any problems. Where is the container for the Su-30? If it is not, then the Afaristic capabilities of our aircraft, before --- invented, sold to the Indians, because. NATO didn’t have any secrecy, and it’s already been tested in combat companies. So get ready for other surprises. Our MiG, beautiful in flight characteristics, looked like a starving man amid afar rafals, etc.
          1. Malyuta April 29 2020 22: 23 New
            • 11
            • 9
            +2
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            they’re trying to isolate themselves from the problems of our armored personnel carrier, from all the machines of the “Armat” system, in the air without MiGar AFAR and Dry without any problems. Where is the container for the Su-30? If it is not, then the Afaristic capabilities of our aircraft, before --- invented, sold to the Indians, because. NATO didn’t have any secrecy, and it’s already been tested in combat companies. So get ready for other surprises. Our MiG, beautiful in flight characteristics, looked like a starving man amid afar rafals, etc.

            Here for such statements of the Ancient rotted! And I just shake your hand! soldier
            PySy. Zadolbali already these Netanalagians with their spiritual simplicity.
            1. Cyril G ... April 30 2020 00: 05 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              How many fighters with AFAR have not tried to recognize in Europe?
      2. mole April 29 2020 20: 38 New
        • 6
        • 11
        -5
        Quote: Mabius
        Quote: evgenii67
        What are these cries for? It seems that everyone understands how this can turn out.

        Check the reaction, who and how
        Will react .. hi

        We have this "otvetka" The law provides. In the light of inaudible decisions made by state authorities and mistakes made earlier and in the present trying to unite the nation in the face of another threat. Purpose: to increase the rating of the State Power. In a word: window dressing.
        Now, from all the “irons” they will sound an angry and decisive statement.
        1. Mabius April 29 2020 21: 21 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: Mole
          Now from all "irons" they will blow about an angry and decisive statement

          Well, neolibers will blow it ... But everything is done in silence, they just warned EVERYTHING! hi
          1. mole April 29 2020 21: 26 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            We will see. But I am sure through central channels it will be one of the "top" news.
            1. Mabius April 29 2020 21: 50 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Quote: Mole
              We will see. But I am sure through central channels it will be one of the "top" news.

              "Our Media" has long been not ours .. Chatting about all kinds of animals which somewhere they saved and the like rubbish flashmobs in the manner of the Western BBC and CNN .... Damn damn it negative But serious topics are hushed up!
              And the military theme is generally taboo. bully .
              1. mole April 29 2020 21: 56 New
                • 2
                • 4
                -2
                Quote: Mabius
                Quote: Mole
                We will see. But I am sure through central channels it will be one of the "top" news.

                "Our Media" has long been not ours .. Chatting about all kinds of animals which somewhere they saved and the like rubbish flashmobs in the manner of the Western BBC and CNN .... Damn damn it negative But serious topics are hushed up!
                And the military theme is generally taboo. bully .

                In this case, "overpower"! They showed the type of "balls" to the hegemon. So I’m sure to be promoted.
                "Ray of light" in the midst of bullshit and flash mob. The emotional component is already different.
                1. Mabius April 29 2020 22: 10 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Mole
                  "Ray of light" in the midst of bullshit and flash mob. The emotional component is already a friend

                  Perhaps it will be so, but it’s better to let it be silent, otherwise it will be turned upside down angry
                  1. mole April 29 2020 22: 19 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    Better to show the real problems, but how in the Lake. You look at the beautiful expanse of water, beautiful beaches, sand, water, the sun. And you plunge under water and so much trash, garbage and the deeper, the more trash and dirt. And you understand that there are huge problems with the ecology on this Lake.
  • Keyser soze April 29 2020 18: 40 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    It’s interesting that they might think and shoot with nuclear weapons .... certainly not in Russia, they won’t have enough intelligence, but in Iran or North Korea ... This generally reduces moral barriers in the use of atomic weapons and is very bad.
    1. Ross xnumx April 29 2020 19: 33 New
      • 4
      • 14
      -10
      Quote: Keyser Soze
      It’s embarrassing what they might think and shoot with nuclear weapons ...

      You are probably a good user:
      TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!

      hi
      1. Keyser soze April 29 2020 19: 51 New
        • 20
        • 1
        +19
        TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!


        I do not understand dear ... you were oppressed by the design "can shoot nuclear weapons"? She is true, it seems. And if not - boh with her .... wink

        Bulgarian and Russian are very close. Since I write here I catch myself that I began to confuse words in Bulgarian. Some words are the same, some exist in Church Slavonic or in Russian of the 19th century and in Bulgarian. Damn his head, what to speak of a user at once in both languages ​​.... With English it is easier. Everything is different there.

        hi
        1. Ross xnumx April 30 2020 07: 30 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          English is easier. Everything is different there.

          I spoke only because the Russian language does not have the adverb “oppressive” ... Therefore, I advised you to use a translator to give your words meaning and logic. But then 11 "literate" decided that I personally inflicted a grudge on them personally?
          I will say in Russian: “Type shit in your mouth and spit on me!” And remember, for me your mass stupidity is ridiculous to a much greater degree than the difficulties of translating a Bulgarian user who is fluent in MORE and English.
          hi
          PS
          Five kilograms of tomatoes!
      2. Keyser soze April 29 2020 20: 56 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        You are probably a good user:


        And here is the case, I will ask you a question. I honestly get confused fundamentally:

        "went to the bazaar and bought 5 kilograms of tomato", or
        "5 kilograms of tomato" or
        "5 kilograms of tomato" or in general
        "5 kilograms of tomatoes"

        in Bulgarian, you can use only the form (translated) - "bought 5 kilograms of tomatoes."

        No, my friend, the hell will break with our tongues. And also to know the difference between them - that’s for sure I can’t afford :)

        Plus, I’ll press you, you just asked a question, I don’t think you deserve a minus.
        drinks
        1. poquello April 29 2020 21: 53 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          And here is the case, I will ask you a question. I honestly get confused fundamentally:

          "went to the bazaar and bought 5 kilograms of tomato", or
          "5 kilograms of tomato" or
          "5 kilograms of tomato" or in general
          "5 kilograms of tomatoes"

          as there, according to the new Russian rules xs, but in general “5 kilograms of tomatoes”, for 5 kilograms of which tomatoes, and maybe grams and grams of peers, the last option
        2. venik April 29 2020 22: 32 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          "went to the bazaar and bought 5 kilograms of tomato", or
          "5 kilograms of tomato" or
          "5 kilograms of tomato" or in general
          "5 kilograms of tomatoes"

          =======
          Eugene! Do not guess! wink It will be correct: "5 kilograms of tomatoes"! drinks
          1. Mordvin 3 April 29 2020 23: 51 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: venik
            It will be correct: "5 kilograms of tomatoes"!

            5 kilos of tomatoes, and all the short life.
      3. ROSS_51 April 29 2020 21: 24 New
        • 0
        • 4
        -4
        Quote: ROSS 42

        TRY IT !!! SEARCH !!! BECAUSE !!!

        Why this schizophrenic punctuation? Together with the capsloc, it looks like a diagnosis. Drink a valerian.
        1. venik April 29 2020 22: 35 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Dear ROSS_51, are you by any chance with ROSS 42 not twins? Or just - namesakes? wink
    2. Mabius April 29 2020 21: 54 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Keyser Soze
      but in Iran or North Korea ... This generally reduces the moral barriers in the use of atomic weapons and is very bad.

      Think dangerous here, but most likely, they are preparing us for this and how we will respond in Russia .. I react so, just try to hit Iran .. It will not seem to you in the USA either hi
  • don-1500 April 29 2020 18: 41 New
    • 3
    • 11
    -8
    The answer will be, it’s understandable, but I wonder where our 1,2 and 3 RBMs are aimed at. Washington? New York? Colorado?
    1. Sky strike fighter April 29 2020 19: 19 New
      • 13
      • 5
      +8
      Contact the FSB for detailed explanations. They will tell you there.
      1. Pete mitchell April 29 2020 19: 43 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Contact the FSB for details ...

        Well, why are you misleading your colleague: you must contact the General Staff, at least the Strategic Missile Forces. And then yes, the FSB will explain ... lol
      2. Malyuta April 29 2020 21: 00 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Contact the FSB for detailed explanations. They will tell you there.

        But what if they don’t remember? request
      3. Charik April 29 2020 21: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The FSB should not worry where the ICBMs are aimed, the question is most likely to the Strategic Missile Forces
        1. Sky strike fighter April 29 2020 21: 07 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Charik
          The FSB should not worry where the ICBMs are aimed, the question is most likely to the Strategic Missile Forces

          The FSB should be concerned about those who want to know exactly where the ICBMs are aimed.
    2. Roman1970_1 April 29 2020 19: 51 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Ask Mabius, he knows everything. Americans share their plans with him.
      1. Malyuta April 29 2020 22: 12 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Quote: Roman1970_1
        Ask Mabius, he knows everything. Americans share their plans with him.

        No, to Comrade B, the signal comes directly from the outlet, with the fingers of the right hand, the left is a bit burnt. good drinks
      2. Crimean partisan 1974 April 30 2020 22: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Ask Mabius, he knows everything ... and what is it that you need to have seven spans in your forehead ???? blows to megacities are in the past. they will rummage around the nuclear power plant. and look at the map for nuclear power plants. Hope who will win to find out is not difficult
    3. venik April 29 2020 22: 40 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: don-1500
      but I wonder where our 1,2 and 3 RBMs are aimed at? Washington? New York? Colorado?

      =========
      Well this is depending on WHAT you mean by the abbreviation MRB:
      - Small fishing bot?
      “A motorized reconnaissance battalion?”
      or
      - A series of books "Mass Radio Library"?
      lol
      1. don-1500 April 29 2020 22: 44 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well, yes, I agree. Wrong wink
    4. Charik April 29 2020 23: 02 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      VV clearly said hypersound in decision centers, that is, where the orders come from, further down the list, military bases — the largest cities — industry — think it up yourself
  • Pashhenko Nikolay April 29 2020 18: 46 New
    • 11
    • 43
    -32
    Somehow I’m one hundred percent and not sure about it. Children have so many there. Will they raise a hand? With the Turks, cheeks blew and blew away.
    1. Lopatov April 29 2020 18: 51 New
      • 19
      • 9
      +10
      Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay
      So many kids there

      Well of course there.
      Kids are unnecessary ...
      Not time to change manuals?
      1. Mabius April 29 2020 18: 56 New
        • 17
        • 5
        +12
        Quote: Spade
        Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay
        So many kids there

        Well of course there.
        Kids are unnecessary ...
        Not time to change manuals?

        These do not change the manuals .. Most screaming "time to blame" is in Russia, they sit and crap here, making good money on this .. bully This is the statistics! hi
        1. Malyuta April 29 2020 21: 05 New
          • 10
          • 6
          +4
          Quote: Mabius
          Most screaming "time to blame" in Russia is sitting and crap here, making good money on this ..

          This is something new, just 3 months ago, they made good money only on oil, gas and the budget.
          Quote: Mabius
          This is the statistics!

          From Rospozorstat? Then everything is correct, Brzezinski in the furnace, he lied about the elite.
          1. Mabius April 29 2020 21: 27 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Malyuta
            This is something new, just 3 months ago, they made good money only on oil, gas and the budget.

            Well, yes, we’re a “gas station with missiles” for you .. We know this and don’t want to argue, you’ll fly around and humiliate us anyway .. Think for yourself what and how.
            Quote: Malyuta
            From Rospozorstat? Then everything is correct, Brzezinski in the furnace, he lied about the elite.

            He deceased dreamed of the collapse of the USSR and this happened alas .. But the Russian spirit is more difficult to destroy here .. Russia has the ability to be reborn from the ashes and become even stronger and it’s not in the power of the matter .. That's how we live bread! hi
            Do not anger us and you will be happy negative
            1. Malyuta April 29 2020 21: 56 New
              • 10
              • 6
              +4
              Quote: Mabius
              Do not anger us and you will have happiness negative

              And why are you showing happiness in the opposite direction! belay
              You get at least angry, at least not angry, anyway kaput?
        2. g1washntwn April 30 2020 07: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Mabius
          This is the statistics!

          Statistics from the echo of Moscow? In the United States, one out of every six supports the preemptive strike against Russia without hesitation. For honesty, run a similar survey in Russia (not in the Duma or on TV, but on the street). Sure, be surprised at the number of sane people, unlike ...
      2. Kronos April 29 2020 19: 24 New
        • 5
        • 11
        -6
        And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?
        1. Lopatov April 29 2020 20: 00 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Quote: Kronos
          And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

          Are they so stupid as to leave “property and relatives” there after the United States, together with Europe, began to wave the sanctioned club?
          1. Kronos April 29 2020 20: 27 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            Yes left - citizenship and accounts
            1. Lopatov April 29 2020 20: 27 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Well, of course. They are dumber than a steam locomotive ...
              1. Kronos April 29 2020 20: 28 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Listen to the statements of officials and doubts about stupidity will disappear
                1. Lopatov April 29 2020 21: 35 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  You already decide whether they are smart enough to steal, or stupid enough to lose.
                  And then you somehow have it all at the same time ...
                  1. Ross xnumx 1 May 2020 04: 51 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Spade
                    You already decide whether they are smart enough to steal, or stupid enough to lose.

                    You yourself would decide on the priorities. And then from your words it is not clear whether you deny the facts of the presence of business, property and accounts of relatives of senior officials abroad, or agree that this is impossible a priori, and the facts and the presence of registers with names are just fake news.
                    We also do not slurp cabbage soup. But the EU and the rest of the world community, about the need for a merger with which the HMS and EBN have been talking for so long, just doesn’t take anything away, adheres to some rules and laws. Here are just a little tell us about the correctness at the level of laws requirements. We are more often struck by the news that the “cute and fluffy” Russian GAZPROM SHOULD (!!!) pay billions (2,56) dollars to the ugly and vile NAFTOGAZ. If it is against the law - why pay?
                    And about the non-Russian oligarchic fairy tale “How one non-Russian peasant stole in Russia and got to live abroad” tell Usmanov, Abramovich ... Yes, there is one there that brought with it money from the Russian PFR ...
                    But to you, the "true and only" defenders of Russia and guardians for her happy tomorrow, such information that splashes of the vital product excreted by the kidneys into the eyes ...
                    Absolutely no! And all these withdrawn billions, the sizes of which are broadcast from federal irons, are lies and lies. After all, to be convinced of the opposite (capital inflow from the outside), it is enough to look out the window. There you can see how the Russians are "shoveling money" with shovels ... repeat Or the Lopatovs with the help of the Russians?
        2. Mabius April 29 2020 20: 57 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Kronos
          And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

          Well, who’s smarter, he’s already satisfied with his children in Russia and legalizes his assets .. Here is this outflow and is alarming .. Work, they will not be obvious, for the good of Russia .. negative
        3. Malyuta April 29 2020 21: 08 New
          • 11
          • 7
          +4
          Quote: Kronos
          And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

          They have everything near Voronezh, everything was exported from the ruble closer to Paradise. yes
        4. Marconi41 April 29 2020 22: 16 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Kronos
          And what isn’t it that abroad, with many in power, property and relatives?

          This, in principle, is not important, if a rocket flies at you, then believe me, you least think about your relatives abroad. You just do your job here in war as in war: Either you - or you. A council of relatives in America will not be assembled at this time. There will be no time!
        5. Charik April 29 2020 23: 05 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          the main thing is that the Chief-TAM had nothing
    2. Range April 29 2020 18: 53 New
      • 25
      • 3
      +22
      Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill. And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems. They hate Russia and cherish the jackal, so why pity them.
      1. Mabius April 29 2020 21: 04 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Spectrum
        Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill.

        But there is something to lose in this world ..!
        Quote: Spectrum
        And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems. They hate Russia and cherish the jackal, so why pity them.

        And on the start buttons are not their children and grandchildren are sitting .. Here we talked))))

        A joke with meaning ... soldier
      2. Thunderbolt April 29 2020 21: 36 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: Spade
        Well of course there.
        Kids are unnecessary ...
        Not time to change manuals?
        It’s not time, because the kids are still there, and the first 10 years ago, referring to the people of ours officially stated that the offshore capital withdrawal system did not suit him and he was ready, under general approval, to deal with such people's injustice. He then, during another appeal to the people, Volodin, Medvedev., Gundyaev and all the other Sechins and Millers on duty applauded on duty. And if you have a military airbag, this does not mean that you are a king and a god. For example, I live from zp to zp, investing all my money in Most of Russians run out of supplies when Chu nothing to put in the race, then I nachnuts hungry bunty.Kak riots sweep schooled BB and cops showed dashing nineties ---- when people flood the area, the Gendarmerie goes on the side of the people.
        1. Malyuta April 29 2020 22: 07 New
          • 11
          • 6
          +5
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Even the first 10 years ago, referring to the people of ours, he officially stated that the offshore capital withdrawal system did not suit him and he was ready, under general approval, to mortally fight such popular injustice.

          He always lied ....
      3. Ross xnumx 1 May 2020 05: 02 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Spectrum
        Those who give orders to launch rockets have no relatives beyond the hill. And those bureaucrats and other sub-ping guards that have children abroad are their problems.

        Another truth in the host of false propaganda ... wassat
        This is for those inside the product from which ICBMs will fly, there are no relatives over the hill. And those who give orders and sign laws sparing the taxes of “rich Russian Pinocchio”, which spread rot for their people, who have not been able to reproduce, have very peculiar interests and a lot of friends with relatives and acquaintances. So, do not weave about the disinterestedness of Russian officials, "honest and incorruptible, courageous and principled." Your weaving will not close the holes gnawed by these (how to say softer?) Insects ...
    3. Bratkov Oleg April 29 2020 22: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It seems that the children of those who press the button are sitting in Russia.
  • Zaurbek April 29 2020 18: 48 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    There, the SPRN will already understand who and where flies .... and before it reaches, our rocket will fly towards. And there let them understand.
    1. Grandfather April 29 2020 18: 54 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Quote: Zaurbek
      There, the SPRN will already understand who and where flies .... and before it reaches, our rocket will fly towards. And there let them understand.

      no one will understand.
      1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 19: 23 New
        • 2
        • 11
        -9
        There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.
        1. dvina71 April 29 2020 19: 30 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: Zaurbek
          There’s just such a concept,

          This is the concept of a kind of thousandth salvo with axes .. but always the bearers of this dogma pour in on simple questions.
          In order to guarantee the destruction of cp, the warhead should explode very close to it .. a full-fledged head with a charge of one hundred ct, 5ct .. only annoy ..
          1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 19: 37 New
            • 1
            • 9
            -8
            There, mixed warheads are considered .... highly accurate simple and small nuclear ones .... then interception of those who started.
            The main idea is that, in addition to powerful nuclear warheads with low accuracy in cities, there is nothing to answer, and we will only be affected by mines, decision centers and dictator. And everyone else is alive and well. They will meet the occupation government.
            1. dvina71 April 29 2020 19: 48 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Zaurbek
              The main idea is that, in addition to powerful nuclear warheads with low accuracy in cities, there is nothing to answer and we will only be hit by mines, decision centers and dictator
              There is such a thing .. When they signed the agreement on the pro, the USSR, as its only authorized cover area, chose the central industrial one, including Moscow, but the states covered their starting brig.
              As you can see .. the US leadership on its population, while they were very afraid of the oblique Soviet apples ... that could endure their ....
              And your theory of the global strike .. poured on the first question .. positional areas of percussion weapons? It’s simpler .. where the CD carriers will be spread across the territory of the Russian Federation .. I remind you .. the range of the main US cr ... ax ... about 2 kilometers ...
              1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 20: 13 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Mediterranean Sea, North, Pacific Ocean + aviation from bases
                1. dvina71 April 29 2020 21: 04 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Zaurbek
                  Mediterranean Sea, North, Pacific Ocean + aviation from bases

                  And where will their axes get to? This time .. Two .. how soon will the nuclear warhead arrive in the area of ​​dense concentration of Kr carriers?
                  1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 22: 54 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    How soon? Can accumulate shock forces .... we have a lot of forces to counter the AUG? 10 Aug USA, plus allied forces ..... launches of the Kyrgyz Republic badly ....
                    1. dvina71 April 29 2020 23: 08 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Zaurbek
                      10 AuG USA,

                      update data on avikas usa ..
                      1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 23: 12 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        So the time is calm now .....
                    2. Charik April 30 2020 17: 05 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      where to find 10 aug of the usa? if there are any, when all of them are released, they will not be idle
            2. Charik April 29 2020 23: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Nonsense
          2. Charik April 29 2020 23: 19 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            he clearly told the BR with the usual warhead, the Ax is KR — I don’t know if they have nuclear warheads now, but you’re doing each other’s brains, something strikes one with a ballistic missile on the territory of the Russian Federation (see the Russian Federation there is no anti-aircraft defense capable of shooting down BR ) and we don’t have a bnm answer, we don’t have Iskander-type BRs, and you tell him about the blow by the thousands of Axes that will be detected instantly and the answer will be not only the KR that the Russian Federation has, but in full.
        2. Marconi41 April 29 2020 22: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Zaurbek
          There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.

          What are you ?! And we will sit and wait until the missile hits the target, what would it be with the nuclear charge or not? Well, you give a pancake.
          1. Zaurbek April 29 2020 22: 57 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            It depends on who we will steer. In the 90s, maybe they would not have decided. Or they may break the connection, they are not stupid people either. Maybe someone will bribe .... the kids are all there, the money, too.
            1. Marconi41 April 30 2020 00: 10 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Zaurbek
              It depends on who we will steer

              Yes, who would not steer! Even if the supreme hesitates, those who have no interests abroad will very quickly help him.
        3. g1washntwn April 30 2020 07: 30 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Zaurbek
          There is simply such a concept that the United States can definitely hit an object on our territory with a conventional warhead warhead .... but we have nothing to answer, and we will not dare to use nuclear weapons.

          This is not a concept, but a disappointing diagnosis.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Charik April 29 2020 19: 36 New
      • 3
      • 7
      -4
      “I do not see a single case in which Russia could resort to its nuclear potential, while in American banks there is $ 500 billion belonging to the Russian elite. You’ll figure out whose elite is yours or ours already. ”- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to the Carter Administration, and during Clinton’s presidency, the author of the concept of NATO eastward expansion
      1. dvina71 April 29 2020 20: 01 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Charik
        US banks hold $ 500 billion owned by the Russian elite. You’ll figure out whose elite is yours or ours already. ”

        And what is there to understand .. this is of course yours. Only in the states you become more elite with the growth of stocks of money .. as you approach the trilliow, it’s already exactly the elite .. all the more .. What is 500 billion? Some rogue people ..
        1. Charik April 29 2020 21: 13 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          turned everything upside down, it’s not I said, read it carefully
  • cniza April 29 2020 19: 05 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.


    If this is true, then they are sick all over, which I do not really believe in ...
    1. Charik April 29 2020 22: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      maybe they think so in a conflict with Iran or SevKor, there will be no global, and the conflict is limited
      1. cniza April 29 2020 22: 37 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        And it does not matter, there will no longer be options ...)))
  • Proton April 29 2020 19: 12 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Yes, these small charges are not about us, they are well aware there, if anything, then we. laughing
  • Doctor April 29 2020 19: 18 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    I don’t understand, if the Americans are reducing the power of nuclear charges, is that kind of good?
    Or what increase, what decrease anyway badly?
    Because like the Americans ...
    1. _Ugene_ April 29 2020 19: 31 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      According to the US military, the use of tactical charges will allow victory in conflicts with a likely enemy, while avoiding a global nuclear war.
      they mean that it doesn’t matter what kind of charge will fly in our direction, small tactical or large strategic, no one will understand and strategic ones will fly back, so that the “partners” do not experience illusions
    2. Avior April 29 2020 19: 39 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Not really
      There are few such missiles with weakened charges, and their use is uniquely spelled out in the US nuclear strategy, adopted a couple of years ago.
      It says that if an adversary inflicts a nuclear strike with a tactical nuclear charge in a conventional war, these missiles are designed for a strictly metered retaliatory strike
    3. SVD68 April 30 2020 21: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Arzt
      I don’t understand, if the Americans are reducing the power of nuclear charges, is that kind of good?
      Or what increase, what decrease anyway badly?

      The thing is different. They place these charges on strategic weapons - on ballistic missiles of submarines. This is a clear provocation in an attempt to force us (Russia) to think about what charges the SLBMs are flying at us with and delay in retaliating. Zakharova said that we will not hesitate and immediately strike back with all strategic nuclear forces.
    4. Military77 April 30 2020 22: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The mattresses are completely opaque with plutonium initiators of TY charge. They must be of very high purity without admixture of decay products; the initiator service life is 20-30 years. The last plant for the production of initiators was closed in 1991, so they make “on the knee” of 150KT.
  • Charik April 29 2020 19: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And what could be different?
  • iouris April 29 2020 19: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    You need to be afraid not of launching from the submarine, but of the repetition of Malta.
  • Charik April 29 2020 19: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And in the photo Ohio in my opinion.
  • antivirus April 29 2020 19: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it sounds strange after the policies of MSG and EBN
    extremely slowly pick up the hands, ... not to mention are the horses harnessed?
  • Kronos April 29 2020 19: 26 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    And last year’s blow of the Tomahawks at the base where the Russian military were so trifles?
  • _Ugene_ April 29 2020 19: 30 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    why are they making such warlike statements? they want to raise the price of oil or what?
    1. Sky strike fighter April 29 2020 19: 42 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      By the principle of a monkey with a grenade. They don’t know how to behave, having such an arsenal. At least the current US authorities. Forget their comments.
  • DEVIL LIFE`S April 29 2020 19: 56 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It can be translated like that, man, I don’t slander you very much, but you don’t answer me, I'm a lady wink
  • Maas April 29 2020 19: 59 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Yes, reluctant to comment on Mrs. Zakharova, she often carries nonsense.
    No one even plans an attack on Russian territory, except in a nightmare. In what sore head would the idea of ​​attacking a nuclear superpower arise? Proxy attacks, yes, economic wars, yes. But there will never be a direct attack on Russia, because it is stingy.
  • Sibguest April 29 2020 20: 23 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It’s worth reminding the brave (before the first shot) striped-Yankee Yankees of the words of Prince Alexander Nevsky: whoever comes to us with the ball will receive the puck (forgive the prince for the irony, but to the place).
    1. Kronos April 29 2020 20: 29 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Do not think that Americans can’t fight
      1. Sibguest April 29 2020 20: 31 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        The history of the wars of the United States of America has shown that they can NOT fight, but they can only fight with a knowingly weak enemy.
        1. Maas April 29 2020 20: 40 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Sibguest, I will comment on your nonsense about the stupid Yankees:
          in World War II, they fought very well even with the Germans and the Japanese. But the main thing is to throw a hat higher and shout cheers?
          1. poquello April 29 2020 22: 45 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Maas
            in the second world they fought very well

            )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))
          2. Bratkov Oleg April 30 2020 23: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            For three and a half years, the Yankees fought with Japan, bombed peaceful cities with atomic bombs, and why was the USSR needed there? But, the USSR, according to the agreement, entered the war with Japan, and a little more than two weeks later, defeated it. Two weeks and three and a half years! In 1943 alone, the United States built almost 70 aircraft carriers, about a dozen and a half, offhand, percussion, and 50 escort ... Every three days they launched an aircraft carrier, cruiser, or destroyer! Horror what a power !!! But the USSR made Japan surrender in two weeks.
  • TatarinSSSR April 29 2020 20: 32 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    I’m sitting right there and I see how in the command center of the General Staff they suddenly receive a message and a picture of a rocket flying from the ocean towards Russia, and the Ministry of Defense calls the president - they say they launched a rocket from us from the ocean - and who is that? Ministry of Defense - I don’t know. President - what kind of rocket? Ministry of Defense - I don’t know. The president is like that - everything is clear. She is from an American submarine and with a small nuclear charge! Launch a nuclear missile in Washington! The Ministry of Defense is like that - that's all, the rocket flew .......... Che for nonsense, she said? Who's scared?
    1. Bratkov Oleg April 30 2020 23: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      I’m sitting right there and I see how in the command center of the General Staff they suddenly receive a message and a picture of a rocket flying from the ocean towards Russia, and the Ministry of Defense calls the president - they say they launched a rocket from us from the ocean ...
      Well, at the end of the USSR it was. Air defense had the right to bring down someone, only with the permission of a minimum of the Minister of Defense, or even Gorbachev personally. They report to the headquarters that Rust is flying, they did not know then that it was Rust, but they report that there is no answer from the Kremlin, or they drink at the dacha, you can’t disturb them, or they take a steam bath in a bathhouse with whores. And Rust sat in the clearing, and lost his air defense, then took off, and then flew ... And before that, an intruder flies over Kamchatka, doesn’t respond to signals, but cannot be shot down - there is no permission from the Kremlin, the Soviet Union’s leadership, tired of whores, is sleeping , the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the CPSU is dozing ... Then he woke up, and he received a report, such as from Kamchatka, asking whether to bring down the offender?
      - Yes, shoot down to hell!
      And the plane is already in neutral waters, left the territory of the USSR, it’s too late to drink Borjomi ... And the interceptor, according to the order, was shot down. Already in neutral space, because of which there was this noise with the South Korean Boeing. Shot down over his territory, it would be easier, but it was impossible, the Secretary General did not allow.
      As with the Strategic Missile Forces, I don’t know, at least any division could shoot back with what was left after using nuclear weapons on it, independently, without an order from Moscow. But it was up to the duty shifts themselves to decide whether to allow or not. I don’t know how the alert worked about a nuclear attack on the country.
  • Junior Private April 29 2020 20: 41 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Nikolai-1970

    One Masha puffs and the "birch" is dancing,

    Maybe the Kalinka? That's how the people scorch.
  • Bratkov Oleg April 29 2020 22: 25 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Nikolai-1970
    Also saw a joke.
    Russia ranks 4th in the world in military spending and 127th in health care.
    Ha ha ha ....

    At the same time, the more they die from coronavirus, simple flu, the more they spend on medicine? In Russia, doctors are engaged in postscript; there is no virus in Russia. Old Man in Belarus finally leaked it in plain text, but Americans, French, British, Italians die like flies ...
  • Charik April 29 2020 22: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How can you discuss this nonsense at all, how do you imagine a nuclear strike against the Russian Federation, such as a nuclear submarine with ICBMs coming, the commander ran to the post and gives the command to launch ICBMs across the Russian Federation! The team opened the mine, he pressed the button and the ICBM flew. Just think what procedures have to go through to launch ICBMs and even for the Russian Federation, it’s not a trifle to poke into your pockets, I don’t know, let those who know say, but at least I have to give the order to the president and certainly not one ICBM with low-power charges, codes launch and more miles of procedures. And while these orders reach the nuclear submarine, in the Russian Federation, the troops also children will know everything from and to.
  • Zeev Zeev April 29 2020 23: 07 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing
    1. Pacifist with AK April 29 2020 23: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I agree! But in the United States there is not so much shmal to shmalnut in Russia)))))))
      1. Zeev Zeev April 30 2020 06: 26 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        In the States, shmal is legal. There is enough.
        But seriously, the use of a tactical vigorous loaf does not make sense in Russia without a strategic missile strike at the deployment areas of mobile missile systems and nuclear submarine bases.
    2. Mordvin 3 April 30 2020 00: 07 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Zeev Zeev
      Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

      It is necessary to entertain people with at least something, otherwise it is boring for him to sit on isolation.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • sergo1914 April 29 2020 23: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Why is the Foreign Ministry talking about this? Did the “button” move to them?
  • vkd.dvk April 29 2020 23: 42 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Civil
    Yeah, we rally all around the EP party and the government, the American military waves its nuclear club at the entire world community and the progressive countries of Iran. DPRK, Venezuela. Our country, being the only lamp of freedom, equality and fraternity, says resolutely no to the gang of overseas oligarchs.

    First of all, in such conditions, the Augean stables are cleaned, and you and others like you are loaded onto trucks with an excavator and driven away from the city.
  • serg v zapase April 29 2020 23: 51 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Any coronovirus launched from the USA across Russia will receive its nuclear response.
  • vkd.dvk April 29 2020 23: 51 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: sergo1914
    Why is the Foreign Ministry talking about this? Did the “button” move to them?

    Because only the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is officially entitled to speak with a foreigner.
    Or does it not suit you? Then come on, I will lie for you, you will receive on the neck, and I will receive a salary.
  • opuonmed April 29 2020 23: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the main thing is that it would not be just a political step, but on the present! in the world there are groups that the world’s owners like to read about themselves, such as a world government, even the EU talked about it and the USA are sitting! everything is not as clear as it seems from the outside! as long as there is nuclear weapons we somehow balance in this world! Do you think there in the Kremlin they do not want the ruble to be strong so that people in the Russian Federation live well, but how to do it in such a world where you have to trade and buy with enemies! it is possible but the borders will be closed and there will again be a scoop or it takes time for people to come there and watch the general picture of the world, not about the country, but about the future of humanity in general! until the elites, both ours and theirs, understand this and sit down to solve problems, we will be on the verge of the collapse of humanity! they wanted to change the constitution for the better, but here the virus and the country are not without a monster, there are deputies and ministers, some of them are doing everything so that their sons receive their education without seeing the future in the Russian Federation, but we will pass it as long as we have a reason for the war and we will live from the fall to growth in the economy) although maybe Putin was put above us over the people to do such things and part of the income was paid there as the Cold War losers pay tribute)))) the very essence is that until humanity becomes depleted we will bite between themselves ! and while we do not set the goal to populate the solar system)))))))))
  • vkd.dvk April 29 2020 23: 55 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Zeev Zeev
    Sorry, but why should the US strike at a country with such a large nuclear arsenal as in the Russian Federation or China with tactical charges? It can be fooled around Iran or the DPRK, but if you are crazy, then with all your heart with all that you can. So Ms. Zakharova’s statement about nothing

    And why in Germany and Norway do penguins keep tactical nuclear bombs and train Germans, French, Norwegians to bomb these pieces of iron? Is Iran really? Or Korea? You need to have brains, you won’t want to write stupidity.
  • Lekz April 29 2020 23: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A fertile topic to talk about. Everything is simpler, Masha chewed for the gifted. Any ballistic missile (of any launch) is interpreted by the SPRN as a missile attack and raises the missile defense and strategic missile forces to the highest degrees of readiness. The “charm” of launching BRs with submarines is that there is too little flight time to find out the goals of launching on the “hot” line, so the answer will be “regular” - megaton. With the sober mind of the attacker (and the cessation of the attack), she will have the opportunity to boast about saving fissile material.
  • shonsu April 30 2020 00: 39 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Absolutely correct answer. And most importantly on time. Not TO plans and developments, and when the submarines are ALREADY equipped. That is, the grandmas have already been spent, and we are leveling out a lesser threat with the same means! And no need to splurge. In my opinion, the Americans outwitted themselves. laughing
  • Zementbomber April 30 2020 01: 01 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Pentagon leadership promotes W76-2 tactical nuclear warheads for equipping ICBMs of American submarines.

    Actually - W76-2 - quite a strategic BLL. This igruha was invented (and creatively embodied) by an "Englishwoman" (who "crap" laughing ) about 20 years ago, within the framework of the megaepic concept of “substratic nuclear strike” (the dreams of the now deceased Iron Margaret about Cordoba welcome everyone!).
    Well and yes - who did it pulnul - SPRN still horseradish will determine.
  • Evil 55 April 30 2020 05: 20 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Well, that’s right .. Just a word, even a representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, is not encouraging enough .. How is that, to shoot a “nuclear loaf” at one’s property behind a sea puddle ..
  • Lieutenant Ivolgin April 30 2020 08: 29 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    So it said Zakharova, this is her opinion. But the GDP and the oligarchs have a different opinion, they have all their honestly earned fortunes in assets, securities, dollars, and real estate. Where is all this? That's right, at distant lands, in the Kashchey kingdom. He already answered once, when the American submarine torpedoed the Kursk. Can someone say the times have changed? No, it’s just that the prices of lies have changed, now it will cost more. The GDP will say that something went wrong and an unplanned launch of a rocket occurred. And then Zakharova will change her mind, Solovyov will pick up, Shoigu will speak, well, etc., according to the already worked out scenario. And who does not agree, the regime of self-isolation.
  • Gennady Fomkin April 30 2020 08: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Norwegian rocket incident - an incident that occurred on January 25, 1995, when a Norwegian-American team of scientists from the Annoya rocket range located on the island of the same name off the northeast coast of Norway launched a four-stage research rocket Black Brant XII. The rocket carried scientific equipment for the study of auroras and went north along a high ballistic trajectory [1], reaching the height of 1453 km at the apogee. Within minutes, as the rocket entered the ballistic trajectory, the SPRN means allowed to establish that the rocket was moving away from the Russian territory and does not pose a threat. Observation of it continued until the landing near Svalbard 24 minutes after launch



    Now think - what if the rocket were approaching Russian territory (flying towards Belarus - it means approaching Russia)? For Russia, this would mean the beginning of the war: The launch of a single missile along a high ballistic trajectory from the Norwegian Sea corresponded to one of the alleged scenarios of a sudden nuclear attack against Russia. The Russian command had information about US military research in order to develop a special nuclear charge that creates a super-powerful electromagnetic pulse. Undermining such a charge at high altitude would ensure the incapacitation of radars, communication systems and other electronics over a vast territory, which would then allow a massive nuclear strike against Russia without fear of retaliation. They don’t joke with such things! And Zakharova is not joking. Unfortunately.
  • Gennady Fomkin April 30 2020 09: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And then there’s a bunch of fucking demagogues, virtually representing how to merge an elephant with an wasp laughing
  • NordUral April 30 2020 09: 48 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Flexible and slippery, it’s time to get used to our inflexibility a long time ago.
  • Brigadier April 30 2020 10: 34 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    The Americans are fools, or simply mental degenerates ...
  • Yury Siritsky April 30 2020 12: 44 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Really these idiots so want to fight and even dream of surviving in this war.
  • Neim xxx April 30 2020 12: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why actually only from the submarine ?? In general, any launch should be regarded as a nuclear attack.
  • KOLORADO73 April 30 2020 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Zakharova is trying to make a hype on American submarines! US submarines are powerful and can afford new warheads!
  • ism_ek April 30 2020 14: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Dear editors! Correct the title. You do not correctly interpret the words of Mrs. Zakharova. A single launch of an ICBM towards the enemy cannot be regarded as a pretext for a retaliatory nuclear strike.
  • DDT
    DDT April 30 2020 16: 30 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Here’s what makes me personally happy, for example, is the fact that our Masha is both longer and more full-bodied and even more porous than any dog ​​there from the Washington commissars ... Which convincingly proves that on the threshold of International Workers' Day, our pratium and the government are leading us on the right path good
    And for this you can already roll, the benefit is already in the evening, but unfortunately there is nothing more to do ... drinks
  • Charik April 30 2020 17: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t understand something, where did some of my comments with the photos go, and what kind of cloning of the articles is such a photo of a nuclear submarine, is there another photo of a nuclear submarine in an article-clone?
  • Charik April 30 2020 17: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    O-O-O already in both articles the photo of the submarine is the same, yesterday a completely different photo of the submarine was
  • Most kind April 30 2020 17: 33 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    In Syria, everyone who flies illegally has already been shot down, now we’ll drown everyone, then we will pay everyone according to a Kansas court decision and hereinafter
  • Charik April 30 2020 17: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I go to the news section, right next to Haftar — this article is about the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a full-length photo of the Ohio submarine, I press-the entrance to the article-crap photo from the nose to the cabin, and yesterday there was a full-length photo of the Ohio submarine, they edit that And with editing and comments, some disappeared.
  • Chaldon48 April 30 2020 18: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I wonder what percentage in the US command of people with inadequate psyche