The effect of the tornado near the Su-24M bomber is shown in the video


An unusual natural phenomenon was observed near the working right engine of the Su-24M front-line bomber. Water dust sucked in by the engine formed the effect of a tornado dancing on the concrete surface of the airfield.


A video of this phenomenon was published on YouTube by the Russian blogger FighterBomber. At the same time, in the video caption, he did not focus the attention of the audience on the tornado, but suggested that they enjoy the beauty of the sound of a working aircraft engine. Just before, some viewers reproached FighterBomber for the unsuccessful selection of musical accompaniment for its commercials, saying that there is nothing more beautiful than the sound of a running engine.


He called the audio accompaniment of the video the effect of Rumel-Gatchinson or Rimsky-Korsakov performed by AL-21F3. "All in all, it's magic."

One of the viewers agreed that it was all about magic. That is, it is a magician’s trick when he distracts him from the most important thing with his actions. In this case, the emphasis on sound can distract from observing the effect of a tornado near the engine. The rapid intake of air causes the air to accelerate and swirl into a whirlwind. At the same time, it was noted that for the appearance of a tornado it was required that several factors converge at once.

Another user jokingly suggested that in this way the engine is fed with medicine scattered on concrete. FighterBomber objected with irony to this, that in the video the engine is looking for a stone, because the purpose of any engine is to find its own stone or bird.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NN52 April 24 2020 14: 18 New
    • 28
    • 1
    +27
    Beautiful photo.

    https://russianplanes.net/id242671
    1. Sky strike fighter April 24 2020 14: 56 New
      • 12
      • 9
      +3
      By the way, in the photo for the article, the Su-24M carries 2 X-59MK anti-ship missiles. Someone recently cried (not you) that the Su-24 was flying at Donald Cook with tactical X-25s, they say, it’s junk, although the rocket is very good today to your standards in your tactical class. Let them breathe calmly, otherwise they tensed like that. Such X-59MK missiles were exported to China.
      By the end of 2015, about 200 Russian-made Kh-59MK anti-ship missiles entered the armament of the Chinese Navy's Navy aviation.

      Missiles enter the arsenal of Su-30MK2 attack aircraft (NATO code Flanker-G). The Swedish Institute SIPRI believes that the armed forces of China received two versions of the missile - the X-59MK and X-59MK2.

      X-59MK is a RCC with a firing range of 285 km, the maximum speed is 0,9 M, the mass of the warhead is 320 kg, it is equipped with an active radar seeker ARGS-59 (ARGS-59).

      http://militaryreview.ru/kitaj-poluchil-na-vooruzhenie-novye-rossijskie-rakety-x-59mk.html
      1. Sky strike fighter April 24 2020 15: 30 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        In the photo of the X-59M he is Ovod-M. I apologize for misleading anyone. The X-59MK ARLGSN, that is, the "head" of the rocket looks similar to the same X-35U.
        Differences in the link below.
        http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-859.html
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. ancient April 24 2020 15: 55 New
          • 11
          • 3
          +8
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          In the photo X-59M he is Ovod-M

          Managed to recover ... wink correctly simple X-59 with RTD and "TV tower" wink
        3. ancient April 24 2020 16: 11 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          the "head" of the rocket looks similar to the same X-35U.

          The "head" is something .. that .. "inside", from above it is a CIRCUIT and at the 35th it is more pointed, and in length ... longer laughing
          1. Sky strike fighter April 24 2020 16: 13 New
            • 8
            • 5
            +3
            Well, you understand the essence, so do not find fault with the words.
            1. ancient April 24 2020 16: 27 New
              • 7
              • 3
              +4
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              Well, you understand the essence, so do not find fault with the words.

              Ok drinks
          2. Charik April 24 2020 21: 26 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            -SS-N-25 “Switchblade” - sharp as- (Russian “flip knife”))
        4. Charik April 24 2020 21: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          neither M, MK-Maxim would at least look at the pictures, so he
        5. smart ass April 25 2020 11: 41 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          I am ashamed not to pay attention to such things !!!)))
      2. ancient April 24 2020 15: 39 New
        • 11
        • 4
        +7
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        By the way, in the photo to the article, the Su-24M carries 2 anti-ship missiles X-59MK

        belay belay belay It is on the Su-24MR (which is pictured in the article) 2 “Kh-59MK” hangs ?????
        "come on .. Burn the car" wassat
        I repeat this MR, under the belly whist container "Spire-2M", on the right plane (on the turning node) container "Pitch".
        You’ll attach a link, but look at the photo (I’ve never seen it before ... I haven’t bothered " wink
        [media=https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2015-09/1443032491_h-59mk-3.jpg]
        1. Sky strike fighter April 24 2020 15: 48 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          I already wrote above that in the photo X-59M he is Ovod-M.
          Firing range, km
          - minimum 10-15
          - maximum 120
          - automatic guidance 40
          Range of management, km 140
          Firing accuracy (KVO), m 2-3
          Flight speed, km / h 860-1000
          Altitude above the sea, m 7
          Altitude above land, m 50,100,200,600,1000
          MiG-29K, Su-30M, Su-24M carrier aircraft.
          Carrier flight speed, km / h 600-1100
          Starting height, m ​​200-5000
          The number of missiles on the carrier 2
          Missile length, mm 5690
          The maximum diameter of the rocket body, mm 380
          Wingspan, mm 1260-1300
          Starting weight, kg 920 (960 for X-59M2E)
          The weight of the warhead (penetrating / cluster), kg 320/280

          http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/x59m/x59m.shtml
          1. ancient April 24 2020 16: 56 New
            • 6
            • 4
            +2
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            that in the photo X-59M aka Ovod-M.

            Numbers are good, but what can you tell about the features of rocket launch, especially for .. "land" purposes (not at the training ground, of course .... well, or at a friend) wink
            1. Sky strike fighter April 24 2020 17: 15 New
              • 10
              • 3
              +7
              The weapons operator enters the coordinates of the target into the memory of the control systems, after which it is launched and the rocket flies independently to the specified area. When approaching the target, the operator, using the video signal displayed on his remote control, must find the target, put an aim mark on it and give a command to capture. Further operations are carried out by the rocket independently.
        2. ancient April 24 2020 15: 56 New
          • 10
          • 4
          +6
          Quote: ancient
          (which is in the photo in the article)

          I apologize ... did not notice that there is also a photo .. I immediately looked at the film and thought that write about this plane, which is in .. "movie" hi
        3. Charik April 24 2020 22: 00 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Under the fuselage, you can suspend a container with general radio intelligence equipment СРС-14 "Pitch", Instead, you can take a device for laser reconnaissance "Spire-2M", Under the right console is a radiation reconnaissance station "Efir-1M" is da Su24mr-but video and another with PTB, and in the photo of the Su24M with X29T missiles, what are you doing each other’s brains laughing
      3. Fregate April 24 2020 16: 29 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        By the way, in the photo to the article, the Su-24M carries 2 anti-ship missiles X-59MK.

        Actually, in the photo he has an X-29t judging by the plumage. Yes, and the x-59 marching engine is carried out and can not be seen in the photo.
        1. bober1982 April 24 2020 16: 35 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Fregate
          In fact, in the photo he has an X-29t

          X-29L
          1. Fregate April 24 2020 16: 42 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: bober1982
            X-29L

            No, it’s T. This is visible. Above x-29t as in the photo, below the "L".

            1. bober1982 April 24 2020 16: 46 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Fregate
              It’s visible

              How so?
              X-29t was never used, never.
              1. Fregate April 24 2020 16: 52 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: bober1982
                How so?
                X-29t was never used, never.

                I don’t know, but it’s the X-29t that is suspended from the photo. I posted two photos in the comment above two missiles "T" and "L".
            2. bober1982 April 24 2020 16: 53 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Fregate
              below the "L".

              This is a picture from the Internet, the signature is simply X-29, and that’s it.
              The Kh-29t and Kh-29l are outwardly similar, you can determine if you look at the missile itself, on the ground, by the homing head itself, laser or television.
          2. ancient April 24 2020 16: 54 New
            • 9
            • 4
            +5
            Quote: bober1982
            X-29L

            In general, not "L". The "L" has a "head" with its nose, and then comes the rocket body.
            1. bober1982 April 24 2020 16: 57 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              I know only three missiles - X-23, X-25ML and X-29L, I do not know others.
              1. ancient April 24 2020 17: 12 New
                • 11
                • 4
                +7
                Quote: bober1982
                X-23, X-25ML and X-29L, I do not know others.

                Well X-23 you ..... "age" can not .. "know" (here I am .. "I know" wink then ........ sad )
                about 25ML and 29 L agree, and they have the same "head".
                And about missiles such as the X-29T and X-29MP .. have not heard?
                Well, about MP this is understandable ... a rarity, but the "Television" in the shelves was like ... "dirt."
                1. bober1982 April 24 2020 18: 17 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: ancient
                  Well X-23 you on ..... "age" can not .. "know"

                  Well, why, even one launch was carried out in 1986, I remembered very well. Despite the fact that they were very rarely allowed, the missile was too outlandish.
                  Quote: ancient
                  And about missiles such as the X-29T and X-29MP .. have not heard?

                  X-29T were adopted, and immediately imposed a ban on their use, which was never removed, and X-25ml and X-29l - were full of them, and were allowed in a lot, X-29mp - I do not know and did not hear.
                  1. ancient April 24 2020 19: 51 New
                    • 4
                    • 4
                    0
                    Quote: bober1982
                    Well, why, even one launch was carried out in 1986, I remembered very well. Despite the fact that they were very rarely allowed, the missile was too outlandish.

                    Captured simple T-6? wink
                    1. bober1982 April 24 2020 20: 37 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Quote: ancient
                      Captured simple T-6?

                      Yes, from 1982 to 1987, hereinafter referred to as "EM", and finished in 1995. on the same "simple"
            2. bober1982 April 24 2020 17: 03 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: ancient
              The "L" has a "head" with its nose, and then comes the rocket body.

              X-25ML, yes, it is, but X-29L- no, as in the photo, if the memory just does not fail.
              1. ancient April 24 2020 17: 19 New
                • 9
                • 4
                +5
                Quote: bober1982
                X-25ML, yes, it is, but X-29L- no, as in the photo, if the memory just does not fail.

                Fails, fails wink ... even structurally, the X-29L has a case diameter of 400 mm, and the X-25ML has only 275 mm, so the “head” flows smoothly into the case, but on the 29th ... only with the nose wink
          3. Charik April 24 2020 22: 03 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            wipe your eyes
        2. ancient April 24 2020 16: 52 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: Fregate
          In fact, in the photo he has an X-29t

          The missiles are definitely X-59M, the APK-9 container hangs under the "belly" .... there were suspension options for the rocket on the left, and the container on the right (especially since it is light ... only 260 kg).
          1. Fregate April 24 2020 16: 55 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: ancient
            Missiles uniquely X-59M, APK-9 container hanging under the "belly".

            I'm sorry, but how do you see what's under his belly? We are talking about a photo for an article, not a video in an article.
            1. ancient April 24 2020 17: 31 New
              • 7
              • 4
              +3
              Quote: Fregate
              I'm sorry, but how do you see what's under his belly?

              I don’t see, but I know .. since X-59M missiles without a control and guidance system, which includes:
              - GSN T-2A "Tubus-2A" (includes a three-axis gyrostabilized platform "with a T-2A television-optical unit placed on it).
              - Inertial control system with autopilot.
              - radio altimeter
              - television-command guidance system "Tekon-1B" ("Tekon-1A" / A-2-01M / "Tekon-2").
              - antenna units of the front and rear hemispheres,
              and which are “packed” in the APK-9 hardware hanging container.
              They can be used exclusively as ... weight and size mock-ups for training in the piloting technique with suspensions. soldier
        3. Charik April 24 2020 22: 03 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          and from the bottom there is still some stray (in 59th)
          1. Fregate April 24 2020 22: 57 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Charik
            and from the bottom there is still some stray (in 59th)

            This stray is the outside engine.
          2. Grigory_45 April 25 2020 09: 02 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Charik
            and from the bottom there is still some stray (in 59th)

            this is an outboard marching engine)

            1. Charik April 25 2020 16: 19 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              and the starting one falls off when?, then the march carries
      4. Charik April 24 2020 21: 15 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Minus for ignorance, firstly it’s X29T-101% and secondly, again, according to X25, that with a knife for a bear

        -on the left pylon X29T (thermal imaging camera), on the right X29L (laser)
      5. Grigory_45 April 25 2020 08: 54 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        By the way, in the photo to the article, the Su-24M carries 2 anti-ship missiles X-59MK

        by the way in the photo post

        on suspensions of the Su-24 rocket X-29L


        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Su-24M carries 2 anti-ship missiles X-59MK

        not to distinguish X-59MK from X-59 - it must be such a listist! They have different fairings, even without glasses)) in the first photo of the X-59MK, in the second - X-59



        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        recently, some people cried here (not you) that the Su-24 flew Donald Cook with tactical X-25

        so the Su-24 was really carried on X-25 suspensions
        and we did not cry fool and they laughed at you, the writer, who with these same X-25s with a launch range of 10 km, the modern destroyer drowned wassat
        1. Charik April 25 2020 16: 21 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, not L, but T or TE or TM or TD
    2. Lipchanin April 24 2020 15: 25 New
      • 6
      • 8
      -2
      Here is also beautiful
      1. Insurgent April 24 2020 15: 50 New
        • 18
        • 6
        +12
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Here is also beautiful

        This is amerikos, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, if not mistaken. Our - here:

        1. Lipchanin April 24 2020 16: 51 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Quote: Insurgent
          Our - here:

          And here is our

          This is americos

          so what
          Isn't it a beautiful photo?
          1. Insurgent April 25 2020 07: 17 New
            • 11
            • 3
            +8
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Isn't it a beautiful photo?

            Not a photo at all laughing
            Quote: atalef
            installation.
            Compare the clouds with the original


            So thatnot original wink laughing

            Quote: svp67
            You are mistaken. A kink of the wing with variable sweep is visible, and if so the F-15 Eagle turns into a deck F-14 Tomcat


            With this, the F-4 Phantom, the “twice ugly” “Vietnam war hero,” I’m definitely not mistaken bully

        2. lis-ik April 24 2020 16: 55 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Insurgent
          This is amerikos, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, if not mistaken. Our - here:

          And if you look closely, the planes are different, but the photo is one (look at the clouds). Who photographed? I think it’s not Americans, it’s easier for them to remove it, because they really have naval aviation.
        3. atalef April 24 2020 17: 26 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: Insurgent
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Here is also beautiful

          This is amerikos, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, if not mistaken. Our - here:


          installation.
          Compare the clouds with the original
        4. volan April 24 2020 18: 31 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          No matter how F-14
        5. svp67 April 24 2020 20: 23 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: Insurgent
          This is amerikos, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, if not mistaken.

          You are mistaken. A kink of the wing with variable sweep is visible, and if so the F-15 Eagle turns into a deck F-14 Tomcat
        6. Grigory_45 April 25 2020 11: 48 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Insurgent
          This is amerikos, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, if not mistaken

          The F-15 does not have a wing with variable sweep, and the glider is a bit different. In the picture - Tomkaet F-14
    3. Breard April 25 2020 03: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes! Really! Beautiful Soviet fighter MIG -31!
    4. Kunica April 26 2020 14: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In short, only right-handed engines are capable of this. smile
  2. knn54 April 24 2020 14: 20 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Someone poured or ... under the right wheel.
    But impressive.
  3. iouris April 24 2020 14: 22 New
    • 1
    • 13
    -12
    Kaby showed how it sucks the filming operator, or at least the euphonic furapet ...
  4. Timon2155 April 24 2020 14: 33 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    No other topics? Just like Zen: someone somewhere filmed something and everyone discusses and relishes. What is the relevance of this tornado to readers?
    1. Fitter65 April 24 2020 17: 43 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: Timon2155
      No other topics? Just like Zen: someone somewhere filmed something and everyone discusses and relishes. What is the relevance of this tornado to readers?

      Come on you. Wild people, they are excusable, they have never seen a gazovskoy airplane in the rain or snowfall, so this is generally a weather show ... Another victim of the exam, for the first time at the airport, didn’t write well — that he was surprised that the planes take off, but not wings waving.hi laughing
  5. Vladimir_2U April 24 2020 14: 44 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Yeah, the truth is that if you skip physics at school, then even the adult world is full of miracles, sometimes deadly. )))
    1. Lipchanin April 24 2020 15: 20 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Yeah, the truth is that if you skip physics at school,

      Some time ago, a group of nuclear physicists arrived on vacation in the Black Sea. We went to the beach and bought wine on the way. And the wine was covered with a plastic cork. Whoever remembers knows how hard it was to pick it up. They suffered, all in vain A local man passed by. They asked him for a knife to open the cork. The man silently took the bottle, pulled a match from his pocket, heated the cork and easily took it off. Before leaving, he raised his finger and spoke
      "The bodies expand when heated. Physics at school should have been better taught"
      1. Uruguay April 24 2020 15: 30 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Quote: Lipchanin
        The man silently took the bottle, pulled a match from his pocket, heated the cork and easily took it off. Before leaving, he raised his finger and spoke
        "The bodies expand when heated. Physics at school should have been better taught"

        Sergey was a little wrong there!
        A man muttered to the academicians "Physics at school needed to teach salagi ..!" laughing hi
        1. Lipchanin April 24 2020 16: 48 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Uruguay
          A man muttered to the academicians "Physics at school needed to learn salagi ..!

          The main thing is that the meaning is the same)
          1. Uruguay April 24 2020 17: 29 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Quote: Uruguay
            A man muttered to the academicians "Physics at school needed to learn salagi ..!

            The main thing is that the meaning is the same)

            That's right, even the drunks of the USSR knew the laws of physics and other chemical processes and philosophy .. !!!!
            In the 90s, many of Kulibina’s selfless talents were won, which they couldn’t accept all this coven of collapse .. But she survived and kept the designs in the tables of their Khrushchevs, even under the threat of hunger and bandits .. They need to put a monument on Red Square, like Minin and Pozharsky !! hi
            They saved Russia from destruction, their eternal memory to nameless engineers and designers .. Believing in Russia to the end! hi
            1. Lipchanin April 24 2020 18: 56 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: Uruguay
              and other chemical processes

              Even as they knew laughing
              "Lana" three zilch in a glass of water and "forward and up" laughing
              1. ROSS_51 April 24 2020 21: 10 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                And I remember how in one lousy beer bar a local drunk poked around from table to table and offered for a small fee a couple of zilch dichlorvos in a mug.))
                1. Lipchanin April 24 2020 21: 14 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  But the most scarce "product" was of course "Cucumber Lotion" laughing
              2. 73petia April 24 2020 21: 27 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                I don’t know about “Lana” into the water, but I know that three zilch of “Dichlorvos” per glass of beer.
  6. orionvitt April 24 2020 14: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The phenomenon is very common, and not only at the airport. Often observed similar on the TU-134, even in flight, when you sit in the tail near the engine. The engine draws in a boundary layer of air from the fuselage and a thin stream of turbulence of compressed air (similar to the video) stretches towards the air intake, and against the direction of flight. I always wondered how this is possible at such speeds.
    1. Aviator_ April 24 2020 15: 07 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      If a boundary layer enters the engine air intake, the engine will stall due to uneven flow. What you observed is the end vortex from the wing mechanization system or controls (flaps, ailerons). With high humidity in the area of ​​low pressure (and this is the core of the vortex), moisture condensate is observed.
      1. orionvitt April 24 2020 22: 27 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Aviator_
        What you observed is the end vortex from the wing mechanization system.

        From the side of the fuselage? What kind
        wing or control mechanization systems (flaps, ailerons)
        if the engines on the TU-134 are installed in the tail, far behind the wing. Do you even think before you write. Or change the profile picture.
        1. Aviator_ April 24 2020 22: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Have you watched everything from the cabin?
          If so, then the air intake is not visible from there. Most likely it was an end vortex from the flap; when they were released into the landing position, a vortex was formed on each side of it due to air flowing from the lower surface of the flap to the upper through the gap between the fuselage and the flap. When flying in humid air in a vortex core, where there is a reduced pressure, condensation occurs, these vortex nuclei become visible. The whirlwinds are dead, they will not do anything bad to the engine. This has nothing to do with the frontier. Make sure of this by reading Schlichting's book The Boundary Layer. Classic. But do not be rude.
          1. orionvitt April 25 2020 13: 14 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Aviator_
            Have you watched everything from the cabin?
            If so, then the air intake is not visible from there.

            How so?
            Where is the flap here, let me ask?
            1. Aviator_ April 25 2020 15: 41 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I am glad that the air intake is visible from the Tu-134 porthole. I myself have never seen, never had a chance to fly in such places. A flap at the trailing edge of the wing, which is not visible behind the edge of the porthole. And where is the border layer?
              1. orionvitt April 26 2020 13: 22 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Aviator_
                A flap at the trailing edge of the wing, which is not visible behind the edge of the porthole.

                From engine to wing, meters 8. And from the fuselage to the engine, not more than a meter. The vortex cord (if it arises), stretches from the fuselage along the front edge of the pylon, goes around the engine and is sucked in at the entrance to the air intake. And here is the wing, and the flaps, and mechanization? What do you want to explain to me? I talked about a phenomenon that I witnessed more than once.
                1. Aviator_ April 26 2020 13: 57 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Mechanization and flaps are here because it is where vortices form. Vortex bundles are formed on the fuselage at angles of attack of 30–40 degrees, which is realized only in catastrophes on passenger cars. In the gap between the flap and the fuselage released, a vortex forms, which you saw. I also watched them.
                  And further. What do you call the pylon on the Tu-134, and where is its leading edge.
                  1. orionvitt April 26 2020 14: 19 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    You confuse the vortex air seal occurring on the wing at large angles of attack, with the "vortex tourniquet" sometimes occurring at the entrance to the air intake of the aircraft engine. I ask again what do you want to prove to me? Re-read the article again, review the video. Where is the wing, where are the flaps? Airplane parked, not in the air. It draws air from the nearest surface (in this case, concrete). In the case of the TU-134, the engine is located quite high from the ground (especially in flight laughing ) and therefore, sometimes it draws in from the nearest surface, that is, from the side of the fuselage ..
                    What do you call the pylon on the Tu-134
                    A pylon is whereby the engine is mounted on an airplane. In this case, not on the wing, but to the rear of the fuselage. And the leading edge is that of the front. laughing
                    1. Aviator_ April 26 2020 15: 28 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      I'm not talking about the occurrence of a vortex when taxiing on the ground. I understood your text that you observed this effect in flight, vortex bundles entering the air intake. So, in flight, the vortex structure is well visualized precisely from the mechanization of the wing.
                      stretches from the fuselage, along the front edge of the pylon, goes around the engine and is sucked in

                      Is this what you observed in flight, or on the ground?
                      And do not use the term “boundary layer” in vain.
  7. Aviator_ April 24 2020 15: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A common occurrence at the airport, I have repeatedly observed how puddles at the taxiway are drained in this way.
  8. Thrifty April 24 2020 15: 28 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Whatever it is, but for a plane standing on the ground motionless it is definitely not dangerous, and also beautiful. ..
  9. wow
    wow April 24 2020 17: 07 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Oh my god you are mine! Anyone who served in the Air Force, whether it be a pilot or techie, observed such phenomena hundreds of times. High humidity wah + wet concrete. There is nothing unusual here. A small "tornado" under the air intake. On our MiG-27s, this was the most common occurrence at GSVG airfields. In Germany, humidity is always very high in summer and in winter.
  10. Charik April 24 2020 21: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Something is spilled and the engine retracts
  11. pafegosoff April 24 2020 21: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, yes, I saw this two hundred times. We did not have a Su-24, but the An-24-26-32 perfectly coped with sucking water out of a puddle by means of a tornado ...
  12. old grandfather April 25 2020 11: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    He served in the 1973-74 MiG-21 (aircraft technician). Regularly saw such tornadoes entering the air intake. Perhaps they are visualized due to reaching the dew point during rarefaction and moist air.
  13. ODERVIT April 25 2020 16: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    An everyday occurrence. In everyday activities, the main thing is that a foreign object gets from the surface into the VZ channel with a whirlwind.