US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

34
US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

Washington began a review of its policy in the Arctic, given that Russia significantly increased its military presence in the region. This was stated by a senior official of the US State Department.

Speaking at a State Department briefing on Thursday, the American diplomat said that the US’s actions in the Arctic, in particular, the strengthening of its military presence, are of concern to the United States. According to him, Washington is particularly concerned about Russian military bases, military airfields "restored in the region" and deep-sea ports.

(...) we are concerned about the construction by Russia of military facilities in the Arctic. The Russian presence has grown significantly in recent years, the Arctic command has been created, airfields and other infrastructure, deep-sea ports, new military bases along the coast, efforts to deploy air defense and missile systems, early warning radars have been restored

- he said.

The State Department official explained that Washington is "in the process of" reviewing US policy on the Arctic region. At the same time, he acknowledged that Russia is in the Arctic "legally", and on some issues, US-Russian cooperation is "going well." As an example, the official cited a number of environmental protection programs.



In turn, Moscow previously stated repeatedly that the military activity of NATO countries, especially those not related to this region, leads to increased tension and leads to destabilization. Recently, the activity of the alliance in the Arctic has increased significantly.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    34 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +14
      April 24 2020 08: 55
      US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic


      As much as your soul desires, worry ...
      1. +6
        April 24 2020 09: 05
        US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

        Okay, but we are concerned about the existence of the Phashington on the planet, in general!
        So whose concern should be stronger?
        1. +4
          April 24 2020 11: 58
          We won’t compete with them, but we don’t meddle with them, so let them not bother us ... hi
          1. +1
            April 24 2020 13: 59
            One can only dream of peace. They don’t dare to do more, that's why we will always and always work! soldier
      2. +6
        April 24 2020 09: 07
        US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

        The United States is concerned about the presence of Russia - that’s probably it will be more true.
        1. +4
          April 24 2020 09: 39
          In any area of ​​the world, the only thing that worries Americans is the lack of "American hegemony."
          1. +1
            April 24 2020 11: 51
            How convenient for the State Department is one and the same, They only change the name of the region: Venezuela, Syria, the Arctic.
        2. +1
          April 24 2020 11: 59
          Quote: Valery Valery
          US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

          The United States is concerned about the presence of Russia - that’s probably it will be more true.


          We interfere with their existence, but these are their problems ...
      3. 0
        April 26 2020 22: 53
        Better worry about your coronavirus! wassat
    2. +4
      April 24 2020 08: 55
      The American diplomat said that Russia's actions in the Arctic, in particular, the strengthening of its military presence, are of concern to the United States.

      In such cases, the main thing is not to comb.
      1. +2
        April 24 2020 10: 35
        Does Honduras bother Americans? - gloating the public in quarantine
    3. +1
      April 24 2020 08: 57
      They feel such anxiety, can't even eat? Well, chatting - don't toss bags! They have a lot of opportunities, the whole Alaska ... let them train.
    4. +2
      April 24 2020 09: 01
      US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

      The impudence and appetite of the Americans is growing exponentially ... The Russian Arctic has always been our patrimony ... and the Americans are already shamelessly creeping into our waters ... someday they will have to be put in place ... well, at least the Russian icebreaking fleet is in combat-ready condition.
    5. -1
      April 24 2020 09: 02
      (...) we are concerned about the construction by Russia of military facilities in the Arctic.

      Well, they still would not have been worried. The easiest way to get them through the North Pole. And the hydrocarbon reserves there are significant.
    6. +2
      April 24 2020 09: 05
      It would be nice for the Kremlin to worry about the presence of the United States at the borders of peaceful Mexico and Canada!
    7. +1
      April 24 2020 09: 10
      It is a shame to the world gangster to tears that there is no way to take this part of the planet into his hands.
    8. +1
      April 24 2020 09: 18
      In my opinion, there are only 2 countries left in the world that do not "bother" mattress makers: Poland and Ukraine. belay
      1. 0
        April 24 2020 09: 28
        Quote: Amateur
        Poland and Ukraine.

        Yes, there, almost all of Europe is listed as omitted.
    9. 0
      April 24 2020 09: 40
      Let them worry. It is not our leisure to take care of their peace. They can also "attend" if they feel like it.
    10. 0
      April 24 2020 09: 44
      let greens be green where anxiety
    11. -2
      April 24 2020 09: 53
      We are concerned about the concern of the United States. Here, in principle, and talked.
    12. 0
      April 24 2020 09: 59
      Americans in every barrel gag. We are building ports, bases, and air defense systems on our territory!
    13. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 16
      What official, what is the last name when it was said? Well, then, I’m worried that Martians didn’t capture the Antarctica.
    14. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 20
      How much nonsense they began to write in the media is not comprehensible to the mind. They did the right thing in the USSR that they didn’t close all this husk to the media.
    15. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 32
      We are concerned about the construction by Russia of military facilities in the Arctic. The Russian presence has grown significantly in recent years ...
      It's too late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys have fallen off. With the Arctic in the same position as with hypersonic weapons - catch up and catch up. Well, at least for now they admit that Russia is in the Arctic "on legal grounds."
    16. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 36
      They are doomed to worry crying
    17. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 36
      They are doomed to worry crying
    18. 0
      April 24 2020 10: 41
      US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic

      The United States is concerned about Russia's military presence in Russia.
    19. 0
      April 24 2020 12: 12
      Not well. When the border went from the Kola and Chukchi Peninsulas to the North Pole, no one was worried. And then on you, combed. Russia is the successor of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR, and Shoigu is the chairman of the Russian Geographical Society. Ugh on you. Ugh again
    20. 0
      April 24 2020 12: 24
      Washington has begun revising its policies in the Arctic,
      It's too late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys have fallen off. laughing
    21. 0
      April 24 2020 16: 29
      And the flag in your hands.
    22. 0
      April 24 2020 16: 53
      US Concerned about Russia's Military Presence in the Arctic
      Be scared.
    23. -1
      April 25 2020 15: 39
      I’m glad that, while there’s no concern about the presence of Russia in their, American, solar system
    24. 0
      April 25 2020 19: 37
      I don’t understand something, probably, what has to do with the military bases on Russian soil and the State Department? Do they have problems with geography? Well, looking at the pearls of "theirs" the day before yesterday, a lot becomes clear ... Fighters for democracy, "you panic" ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"