The contract for the construction of the lead atomic icebreaker "Leader" has been agreed

The contract for the construction of the lead atomic icebreaker "Leader" has been agreed

The contract for the construction of the atomic icebreaker "Leader" will be signed before the end of April, all disagreements between the parties have been removed. It is reported "Businessman".


According to the publication, the Far Eastern shipyard Zvezda and the state corporation Rosatom are ready to sign a contract for the construction of the lead nuclear icebreaker of the new generation project 10510 code "Leader", all parameters are agreed. The parties declare their desire to sign the agreement by the end of April, however, the coronavirus pandemic interferes with physical signing. Currently, various options for meeting representatives of the parties located in different parts of our country are being considered. After signing the contract, the ship will be laid, delivery of the icebreaker to the customer is scheduled for 2027.

As previously reported, in total it is planned to build three icebreakers of the new project. In January of this year, the Russian government allocated 2020 billion rubles from the federal budget for the construction of the lead icebreaker from 2027 to 127,576979. Funds have not yet been found for the construction of two other icebreakers of the series, but there is still time, their laying is scheduled for 2023.

Icebreakers "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-tonnage cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

According to the project, the total displacement of the new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

As the developers of the project from the St. Petersburg Iceberg Central Design Bureau stated, the Leader icebreaker will be able to reach speeds of up to 24 knots in clean water and up to 12 knots on ice up to 2 meters thick. The maximum overcome ice thickness is 4 meters. The service life of such an icebreaker is designed for 40 years. The crew is 127 people. The autonomy of the icebreaker in terms of provisions will be 8 months.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NF68 April 22 2020 15: 31 New
    • 24
    • 0
    +24
    Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.
    1. Alexey Sommer April 22 2020 15: 36 New
      • 16
      • 1
      +15
      Quote: NF68
      Looks gorgeous.

      good Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
      Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.
      1. Sky strike fighter April 22 2020 16: 15 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: Alexey Sommer
        Quote: NF68
        Looks gorgeous.

        good Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
        Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.

        Somewhere in London, Abramovich let out a stingy tear.
        1. antivirus April 22 2020 17: 10 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          and will Rramovich be entrusted with putting rockets in containers on the decks?
          1. Sandor Clegane April 22 2020 19: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: antivirus
            and will Rramovich be entrusted with putting rockets in containers on the decks?

            so on the Leader they (missiles) will not be
        2. venik April 22 2020 19: 22 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Somewhere in London, Abramovich let out a stingy tear.

          ======
          Better to "crap one's pants" (from envy) !!!
      2. Albert1988 April 22 2020 19: 28 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Alexey Sommer
        Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
        Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.

        And healthy is unrealistic - a total displacement of 71 with a dashing thousand tons - it’s almost the battleship Yamato, the former “thickest” of the battleships!
    2. Magistr April 22 2020 15: 40 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Quote: NF68
      Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

      I hope that inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment .. Well, God forbid, so as not to delay the construction ..
      1. NF68 April 22 2020 15: 40 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: Magistr
        Quote: NF68
        Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

        I hope that inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment .. Well, God forbid, so as not to delay the construction ..


        I'd like to hope so.
      2. Motorist April 22 2020 16: 16 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        crammed with modern equipment

        Just not too "modern." And then, you know, they shove everything in a row in a steamship into fashion; despite the low reliability (especially - electronics and completely unnecessary control systems! am ).
        1. Magistr April 22 2020 17: 18 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Quote: Motorist
          Just not too "modern." And then, you know, they shove everything in a row in a steamship into fashion; despite the low reliability (especially electronics and completely unnecessary control systems! am)

          I agree..! Total should be in moderation and preferably domestic production simple, reliable and maintainable. This is a chip of Russia! And the conditions in the Arctic are severe and I hope it will be taken into account during the construction of such a handsome man!
      3. Rzzz April 22 2020 21: 32 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Magistr
        and inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment.

        And what’s there for the equipment the icebreaker needs .. iron is stronger, the motors are more powerful and more reliable, but the crew comfort.
        On the contrary, it is simpler and more reliable. Passion for state-of-the-art technologies leads to problems when all this starts to break down and you begin to think about where to buy spare parts, how much, how to deliver it and how to ultimately fix it all.
        Two factors must be taken into account - this is a nuclear pepelats, the cost of a malfunction may be too high. And he’ll work on the hell with pussies, repairing it there is extremely difficult, and delivering spare parts - you’ll go crazy at all.
    3. APASUS April 22 2020 17: 16 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: NF68
      Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

      They looked gorgeous, as if from some other galaxy.
      One of the options :
      1. Angelo Provolone April 23 2020 00: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The yacht reminds
  2. Sky strike fighter April 22 2020 15: 31 New
    • 6
    • 8
    -2
    According to the project, the total displacement of the new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

    Nevermind yourself a 3/4 displacement of an aircraft carrier. Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built? I'm not saying that everything is designed from scratch.
    1. AllBiBek April 22 2020 15: 36 New
      • 13
      • 2
      +11
      And what for in those latitudes their aircraft carriers? And - what for they to us in any others? Russia, as it were, has the main maritime border beyond the Arctic Circle, and most of the borders are generally on land.
    2. Bald rat April 22 2020 15: 37 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      He needs such a VI for breaking ice there, they occupy half-ship ballast tanks.
      Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built?

      Maybe it’s worth it to be consistent and to begin to understand which fleet is needed and affordable?
    3. Name Surname April 22 2020 15: 39 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      To put it more precisely, in the conditions of the political and economic system of Russia, an aircraft carrier for now is an expense item, and an icebreaker is a potential income, but for the Americans it’s quite the opposite
    4. alstr April 22 2020 15: 40 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      No. This is so the construction of the destroyer leader disguised. )))
      Imagine. they cost an icebreaker, but they got a destroyer. Here are our "partners" will be surprised)))
      1. Sky strike fighter April 22 2020 15: 59 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: alstr
        No. This is so the construction of the destroyer leader disguised. )))
        Imagine. they cost an icebreaker, but they got a destroyer. Here are our "partners" will be surprised)))

        Also say that someone from the government decided to build a yacht at public expense and disguised it as an icebreaker. In general, there will be a loss.
      2. really April 22 2020 21: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Reminds a joke about a sewing machine, how many did not collect a machine gun
      3. Peter is not the first April 22 2020 21: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Well, to compare an icebreaker with a destroyer is a bit of an overkill in purpose and capabilities. And here is how a ram vessel can be used. Any modern ship will ram through. Only the Missouri battleship may remain in question. drinks
        1. alstr April 22 2020 22: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          They have one code - Leader.
          And then we already have one icebreaker patrol ship. Why not make an icebreaker destroyer?
          Joke.
    5. mintai_kot April 22 2020 15: 42 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Kuzi has 61,5 thousand .... Maybe a typo? If everything fits together it's just a monster! We will be proud of anyone !!!
    6. Vasyan1971 April 22 2020 15: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built?

      Icebreakers "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-tonnage cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

      An aircraft carrier will not help here. request
    7. loki565 April 22 2020 16: 12 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Nevermind yourself a 3/4 displacement of an aircraft carrier. Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built? I'm not saying that everything is designed from scratch.

      It doesn’t work like that, then any tanker is an aircraft carrier, or even two)))
  3. Ilya098 April 22 2020 15: 42 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    April ships happy. 2 nuclear submarines, 2 UDC, 2 frigates, and the contract for an icebreaker was agreed. wink
  4. Chingachguk April 22 2020 15: 44 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    It is good to hear and read about such news. Whoever says anything, but Russia, can slowly but surely move forward.
  5. Vasyan1971 April 22 2020 15: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The parties declare their desire to sign the agreement by the end of April, however, the coronavirus pandemic interferes with physical signing. Currently, various options for meeting representatives of the parties located in different parts of our country are being considered.

    Nothing, hunting more than captivity. Even if the signatories after that end up in intensive care (pah-pah-pah), the job will be done - the papers are signed. Start, go, go ... "The ice has broken." ©
    1. Sky strike fighter April 22 2020 16: 08 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      "The ice has broken"

      Indeed, someone started to move icebreakers with a displacement from an aircraft carrier to build. It would be nice if the ice just moved, but not in this case.
      1. Vasyan1971 April 22 2020 16: 26 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Indeed, someone set off icebreakers with a displacement from an aircraft carrier to build.

        Have you ever seen a mining truck? Or some Tractomas? An-124? Lockheed C-5 Galaxy?
        Also, for sure. Someone "moved" invented and made.
    2. Piramidon April 22 2020 19: 30 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Even if the signatories after that end up in intensive care (pah-pah-pah), the job will be done - the papers are signed.

      It is possible to agree on self-isolation from the house according to Skype and endorse by electronic signatures. good
      1. Vasyan1971 April 22 2020 20: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Piramidon
        It is possible to agree on self-isolation from the house according to Skype and endorse by electronic signatures.

        Exactly! This is not an agreement of interstate significance. In essence - formality. Why breed extra polites?
  6. igorra April 22 2020 15: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Such a fool is good to make the straits.
  7. _Ugene_ April 22 2020 16: 00 New
    • 3
    • 7
    -4
    Funds have not yet been found for the construction of two other icebreakers of the series, but there is still time, their laying is scheduled for 2023.
    judging by how famously the money goes from the NWF, because of all this mess, the funds are unlikely to be found
    1. Sky strike fighter April 22 2020 16: 06 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      I think there are things more important than such icebreakers. For example, the destroyer 22350M. Some 7000 displacement. 10 times less. So it would be better if we cost 1 such icebreakers. You might think that icebreakers aren’t enough for us.
      1. Rzzz April 22 2020 21: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This steamboat was lobbied by the raw materials so that it would lead the tanker to the Arctic fields. That is why he is so healthy. It will be built at public expense, it will also be operated by the state, and services will be provided to them at state prices.
        Most of it is not really needed.
  8. aglet April 22 2020 16: 18 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Quote: NF68
    Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that

    Well, now the engine would not be burned during assembly. and whose engine is not Chinese? who is in the know?
    1. Thrifty April 22 2020 16: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Our engine, Rosatom !!! hi
    2. Piramidon April 22 2020 19: 35 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: aglet
      and whose engine is not Chinese?

      Yeah, Rosatom has written out with AliExpress lol
  9. aglet April 22 2020 16: 22 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Ilya098
    and here’s an agreement for an icebreaker agreed

    Well ? and when will they be built? and who will build? and you already rejoice
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich April 22 2020 16: 34 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: aglet
      who will build?

      A dry dock is under construction at the Leader at the Zvezda shipbuilding complex. The design length is 485 meters, a width of 114 meters and a depth of 14 meters.

      1. bayard April 23 2020 00: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        hi Greetings, Aristakh Ludwigovich!
        The fact that the dock is being completed is certainly good, and the fact that they started to build something there is also good. But there are doubts about the readiness of the shipyard for the implementation of such a complex and large-scale order. There, after all, so far not a single vessel has been built from scratch entirely - only in cooperation with the Koreans. Will the same story come about as the attempts of the Soviet Union in the late 30s to build super linkors, and even at 3 shipyards at the same time, without the necessary experience or personnel, without having passed the logical path from simple to complex : destroyers-cruisers-battleships.
        Remember how these programs were feverish then?
        And now it can even get worse. There is no experience in the construction of something like that on Zvezda. Even just the experience of building large ice class buildings from scratch. And then there is the nuclear power plant ...
        It would be wiser to postpone the “Leader” bookmark for two years, and during this time to have time to prepare properly, fill your hand on simpler orders ... finish building the dock, in the end.
        There is still staff shortage as before.
        And living conditions, housing for workers, infrastructure are not ready.
        We get again unfinished and spraying resources.
        Medvedev waved this decree just before the resignation and now he does not answer. Is it not known that the schedule for the delivery of the "Star" is broken? According to previous plans, it was supposed to be commissioned this year and build tankers and gas carriers with might and main ... But the contractors were gone, the crisis and sanctions made adjustments to the time and cost, and the deadline for laying nuclear super-icebreakers, an unprecedented displacement, cost and power GEM, for some reason did not begin to review.
        Why
        Was Medvedev so sure of the success and readiness of the GCC?
        So now he does not answer for his mistakes!
        He never answered for them.
        Or is it really too fat for the jackpot? Snatch the order, and the grass does not grow?
        After all, is it not customary for us to answer for the assigned business?
        How to lay an icebreaker this year if the dock is not ready for it yet?
        People are not trained and do not qualify even for the construction of gas carriers!
        How can one tackle such complexity?
        You yourself saw how they docked the first building on the "Star"! There, only the bow was built in place, and from 2 \ 3 to 3 \ 4 of the entire body with the main mechanisms and power plants were built in Korea, delivered in floating dock and only docked on the "Star"!
        There at the GCC there are still a lot of Korean consultants and instructors, technologists and craftsmen, without whom the work of POCA is impossible without.
        CVD needs a buildup on simpler and more affordable qualifications for its orders, at least 2 to 3 years. And only then can you begin work on the "Leader". And not before!
        Otherwise, there will again be embarrassment, unfinished and ... appropriate quality.
        So I would not be happy about the upcoming bookmark, it would be better to first launch at least five ice-class tanker hulls and bring the shipyard to the appropriate condition, or, to put it, to finish building.
        And educate people.
        With respect to your competence in this matter.
  10. Pvi1206 April 22 2020 16: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The contract is prepared. So all technologies are available. There will be jobs. The Far Eastern region of the country will develop. And this is already good. One can only hope for great demand from shippers on this route ...
  11. aglet April 22 2020 16: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Thrifty
    Our engine, Rosatom !!!

    as I understand it, Rosatom is a reactor, and the traction engine is electric? which burned in the Arctic?
  12. aglet April 22 2020 16: 30 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Quote: Pvi1206
    The contract is prepared. So all technologies are available. There will be jobs, the Far Eastern region of the country will develop

    and most importantly, there will be, will be, and nothing - is already there. and what will happen, we have already heard more than once, I especially remember 25 million high-tech jobs. and nothing. so it will be now
  13. Podvodnik April 22 2020 16: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    and the state corporation Rosatom are ready to pee


    In the sense: "It is written with a pitchfork on water"?

    The author, maybe the "letter" has sunk?
  14. aglet April 22 2020 16: 38 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Under the "Leader" is the construction of a dry dock at the shipbuilding complex "Star"

    we haven’t built a dock yet, but already shouting, we’ll build an icebreaker. what will happen in 10 years when the dock is built? who will be imprisoned, who will be awarded? and will this icebreaker be needed then?
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich April 22 2020 16: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: aglet
      we haven’t built a dock yet, but already shouting, we’ll build an icebreaker. what will happen in 10 years when the dock is built? who will be imprisoned, who will be awarded? and will this icebreaker be needed then?

      Well, an open outfit slipway of the Zvezda shipbuilding complex has already been built. The dry dock will also be completed in the future. The photo shows an Afromax class tanker being built on an open outfit, judging by the position of the floating dock, the tanker will soon be launched.
      1. Name Surname April 22 2020 16: 46 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Is this the one that was 80% built in Korea and is being completed on the star?
        1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich April 22 2020 16: 50 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Yes, while they are working out the technology. The "Star" is still being built.
  15. aglet April 22 2020 17: 02 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Dry dock will also be completed in the future

    and when will this future come?
  16. aglet April 22 2020 17: 08 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Yes, while they are working out the technology. The "Star" is still being built.

    In November 1945, the Council of People's Commissars decided to build a ship repair plant No. 892. how much can you work out? first we’ll destroy it to the ground, and then we’ll start building, isn’t it? That is, the plant is still being built, and even it is not able to build a dry dock?
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich April 22 2020 21: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: aglet
      and is he even unable to build a dry dock?

      Shipyards are not intended for the construction of dry docks. They must build ships.
  17. Doccor18 April 22 2020 20: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    This is a triumph of Russian shipbuilding! Worthy atomic contemporary
    atomic "grandfather of Lenin"
    1957 year. And a worthy cause
    for the new Far Eastern
    shipyards. These giants
    how to build, greatly change
    North Sea Chart
    ways.
  18. surfdude April 23 2020 09: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Somewhere in the shipyards of Italy and Germany, smile joyfully, waiting for new orders for superyachts from customers from Russia?
  19. aglet April 23 2020 13: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Shipyards are not intended for the construction of dry docks.

    and who should build docks? as I understand it, dry dock, they are still floating, and drowning quickly is part of the shipyard, something like an assembly shop, that is, there is no dock, no plant?
  20. aglet April 23 2020 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Doccor18
    These giants
    how to build, much

    not how they will build, but if they build, it will be more accurate