The contract for the construction of the lead atomic icebreaker "Leader" has been agreed

58
The contract for the construction of the lead atomic icebreaker "Leader" has been agreed

The contract for the construction of the atomic icebreaker "Leader" will be signed before the end of April, all disagreements between the parties have been removed. It is reported "Businessman".

According to the publication, the Far Eastern shipyard Zvezda and the state corporation Rosatom are ready to sign a contract for the construction of the lead nuclear icebreaker of the new generation project 10510 code "Leader", all parameters are agreed. The parties declare their desire to sign the agreement by the end of April, however, the coronavirus pandemic interferes with physical signing. Currently, various options for meeting representatives of the parties located in different parts of our country are being considered. After signing the contract, the ship will be laid, delivery of the icebreaker to the customer is scheduled for 2027.



As previously reported, in total it is planned to build three icebreakers of the new project. In January of this year, the Russian government allocated 2020 billion rubles from the federal budget for the construction of the lead icebreaker from 2027 to 127,576979. Funds have not yet been found for the construction of two other icebreakers of the series, but there is still time, their laying is scheduled for 2023.

Icebreakers "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-tonnage cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

According to the project, the total displacement of the new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

As the developers of the project from the St. Petersburg Iceberg Central Design Bureau stated, the Leader icebreaker will be able to reach speeds of up to 24 knots in clean water and up to 12 knots on ice up to 2 meters thick. The maximum overcome ice thickness is 4 meters. The service life of such an icebreaker is designed for 40 years. The crew is 127 people. The autonomy of the icebreaker in terms of provisions will be 8 months.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    58 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +24
      April 22 2020 15: 31
      Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.
      1. +15
        April 22 2020 15: 36
        Quote: NF68
        Looks gorgeous.

        good Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
        Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.
        1. +7
          April 22 2020 16: 15
          Quote: Alexey Sommer
          Quote: NF68
          Looks gorgeous.

          good Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
          Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.

          Somewhere in London, Abramovich let out a stingy tear.
          1. +1
            April 22 2020 17: 10
            and will Rramovich be entrusted with putting rockets in containers on the decks?
            1. 0
              April 22 2020 19: 48
              Quote: antivirus
              and will Rramovich be entrusted with putting rockets in containers on the decks?

              so on the Leader they (missiles) will not be
          2. -2
            April 22 2020 19: 22
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            Somewhere in London, Abramovich let out a stingy tear.

            ======
            Better to "crap" (with envy) !!!
        2. +2
          April 22 2020 19: 28
          Quote: Alexey Sommer
          Like a cruise yacht, only for the arctic ocean.
          Of course, we are the undisputed leaders on this planet in this area.

          And healthy is unrealistic - a total displacement of 71 with a dashing thousand tons - this is almost the battleship Yamato, which was the "thickest" of the battleships!
      2. +2
        April 22 2020 15: 40
        Quote: NF68
        Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

        I hope that inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment .. Well, God forbid, so as not to delay the construction ..
        1. +4
          April 22 2020 15: 40
          Quote: Magistr
          Quote: NF68
          Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

          I hope that inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment .. Well, God forbid, so as not to delay the construction ..


          I'd like to hope so.
        2. 0
          April 22 2020 16: 16
          crammed with modern equipment

          If only not too "modern". And then, you know, they shove everything into steamers in a fashion; despite the low reliability (especially - electronics and completely unnecessary control systems! am ).
          1. -2
            April 22 2020 17: 18
            Quote: Motorist
            If only not too "modern". And then, you know, they shove everything into the steamers in a fashion; despite low reliability (especially - electronics and completely unnecessary control systems! am)

            I agree..! Total should be in moderation and preferably domestic production simple, reliable and maintainable. This is a chip of Russia! And the conditions in the Arctic are severe and I hope it will be taken into account during the construction of such a handsome man!
        3. +3
          April 22 2020 21: 32
          Quote: Magistr
          and inside it will also be equipped and crammed with modern equipment.

          And what’s there for the equipment the icebreaker needs .. iron is stronger, the motors are more powerful and more reliable, but the crew comfort.
          On the contrary, it is simpler and more reliable. Passion for state-of-the-art technologies leads to problems when all this starts to break down and you begin to think about where to buy spare parts, how much, how to deliver it and how to ultimately fix it all.
          Two factors must be taken into account - this is a nuclear pepelats, the cost of a malfunction may be too high. And he’ll work on the hell with pussies, repairing it there is extremely difficult, and delivering spare parts - you’ll go crazy at all.
      3. +3
        April 22 2020 17: 16
        Quote: NF68
        Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that.

        They looked gorgeous, as if from some other galaxy.
        One of the options :
        1. 0
          April 23 2020 00: 04
          The yacht reminds
    2. -2
      April 22 2020 15: 31
      According to the project, the total displacement of the new icebreakers will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

      Nevermind yourself a 3/4 displacement of an aircraft carrier. Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built? I'm not saying that everything is designed from scratch.
      1. +11
        April 22 2020 15: 36
        And what for in those latitudes their aircraft carriers? And - what for they to us in any others? Russia, as it were, has the main maritime border beyond the Arctic Circle, and most of the borders are generally on land.
      2. +7
        April 22 2020 15: 37
        He needs such a VI for breaking ice there, they occupy half-ship ballast tanks.
        Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built?

        Maybe it’s worth it to be consistent and to begin to understand which fleet is needed and affordable?
      3. +10
        April 22 2020 15: 39
        To put it more precisely, in the conditions of the political and economic system of Russia, an aircraft carrier for now is an expense item, and an icebreaker is a potential income, but for the Americans it’s quite the opposite
      4. +4
        April 22 2020 15: 40
        No. This is so the construction of the destroyer leader disguised. )))
        Can you imagine. cost an icebreaker, but got a destroyer. Our "partners" will be surprised)))
        1. +5
          April 22 2020 15: 59
          Quote: alstr
          No. This is so the construction of the destroyer leader disguised. )))
          Can you imagine. cost an icebreaker, but got a destroyer. Our "partners" will be surprised)))

          Also say that someone from the government decided to build a yacht at public expense and disguised it as an icebreaker. In general, there will be a loss.
        2. 0
          April 22 2020 21: 35
          Reminds a joke about a sewing machine, how many did not collect a machine gun
        3. +1
          April 22 2020 21: 42
          Well, comparing an icebreaker with a destroyer is a bit overkill in purpose and capabilities. And here is how a ramming vessel can be used. Any modern ship will ram through and through. Only the battleship Missouri can remain in question. drinks
          1. 0
            April 22 2020 22: 09
            They have one code - Leader.
            And then we already have one icebreaker patrol ship. Why not make an icebreaker destroyer?
            Joke.
      5. +3
        April 22 2020 15: 42
        "Kuzi" has 61,5 thousand .... Maybe a typo? If it all fits together it's just a monster! We will be proud of anybody !!!
      6. 0
        April 22 2020 15: 52
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built?

        Icebreakers "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-tonnage cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

        An aircraft carrier will not help here. request
      7. +1
        April 22 2020 16: 12
        Nevermind yourself a 3/4 displacement of an aircraft carrier. Maybe it would be better if the aircraft carrier itself was built? I'm not saying that everything is designed from scratch.

        It doesn’t work like that, then any tanker is an aircraft carrier, or even two)))
    3. +6
      April 22 2020 15: 42
      April ships happy. 2 nuclear submarines, 2 UDC, 2 frigates, and the contract for an icebreaker was agreed. wink
    4. +1
      April 22 2020 15: 44
      It is good to hear and read about such news. Whoever says anything, but Russia, can slowly but surely move forward.
    5. +2
      April 22 2020 15: 49
      The parties declare their desire to sign the agreement by the end of April, however, the coronavirus pandemic interferes with physical signing. Currently, various options for meeting representatives of the parties located in different parts of our country are being considered.

      Nothing, hunting is worse than bondage. Even if the signatories after that end up in intensive care (pah-pah-pah), the job will be done - the papers are signed. Start, go, go ... "The ice is broken". ©
      1. -5
        April 22 2020 16: 08
        "The ice has broken"

        Indeed, someone started to move icebreakers with a displacement from an aircraft carrier to build. It would be nice if the ice just moved, but not in this case.
        1. +3
          April 22 2020 16: 26
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Indeed, someone set off icebreakers with a displacement from an aircraft carrier to build.

          Have you ever seen a mining truck? Or some Tractomas? An-124? Lockheed C-5 Galaxy?
          Also, for sure. Someone "moved" invented and made.
      2. +1
        April 22 2020 19: 30
        Quote: Vasyan1971
        Even if the signatories after that end up in intensive care (pah-pah-pah), the job will be done - the papers are signed.

        It is possible to agree on self-isolation from home via Skype and to endorse with electronic signatures. good
        1. 0
          April 22 2020 20: 08
          Quote: Piramidon
          It is possible to agree on self-isolation from home via Skype and to endorse with electronic signatures.

          Exactly! This is not an agreement of interstate significance. In essence - formality. Why breed extra polites?
    6. +2
      April 22 2020 15: 55
      Such a fool is good to make the straits.
    7. -4
      April 22 2020 16: 00
      Funds have not yet been found for the construction of two other icebreakers of the series, but there is still time, their laying is scheduled for 2023.
      judging by how famously the money goes from the NWF, because of all this mess, the funds are unlikely to be found
      1. -5
        April 22 2020 16: 06
        I think there are things more important than such icebreakers. For example, the destroyer 22350M. Some 7000 displacement. 10 times less. So it would be better if we cost 1 such icebreakers. You might think that icebreakers aren’t enough for us.
        1. 0
          April 22 2020 21: 37
          This steamboat was lobbied by the raw materials so that it would lead the tanker to the Arctic fields. That is why he is so healthy. It will be built at public expense, it will also be operated by the state, and services will be provided to them at state prices.
          Most of it is not really needed.
    8. -4
      April 22 2020 16: 18
      Quote: NF68
      Looks gorgeous. As if from some other galaxy or something like that

      Well, now the engine would not be burned during assembly. and whose engine is not Chinese? who is in the know?
      1. 0
        April 22 2020 16: 23
        Our engine, "Rosatom" !!! hi
      2. +3
        April 22 2020 19: 35
        Quote: aglet
        and whose engine is not Chinese?

        Aha, "Rosatom" has written out from "AliExpress" lol
    9. -1
      April 22 2020 16: 22
      Quote: Ilya098
      and here’s an agreement for an icebreaker agreed

      Well ? and when will they be built? and who will build? and you already rejoice
      1. +4
        April 22 2020 16: 34
        Quote: aglet
        who will build?

        A dry dock is being constructed under the Leader at the Zvezda shipyard. The projected length will be 485 meters, width 114 meters and depth 14 meters.

        1. +2
          April 23 2020 00: 53
          hi Greetings, Aristakh Ludwigovich!
          The fact that the dock is being completed is certainly good, and the fact that they started to build something there is also good. But there are doubts about the readiness of the shipyard for the implementation of such a complex and large-scale order. There, after all, so far not a single vessel has been built from scratch entirely - only in cooperation with the Koreans. Will the same story come about as the attempts of the Soviet Union in the late 30s to build super linkors, and even at 3 shipyards at the same time, without the necessary experience or personnel, without having passed the logical path from simple to complex : destroyers-cruisers-battleships.
          Remember how these programs were feverish then?
          And now it could be even worse. Zvezda has no experience in building something like that. Even just the experience of building large ice-class buildings from scratch. And then there's the nuclear power plant ...
          It would be wiser to postpone the bookmark of the "Leader" for two years, and during this time to have time to properly prepare, get a handle on simpler orders ... finish building the dock, in the end.
          There is still staff shortage as before.
          And living conditions, housing for workers, infrastructure are not ready.
          We get again unfinished and spraying resources.
          Medvedev waved this decree just before his resignation and now he will not answer. Is it not known that the Zvezda delivery schedule has been disrupted? According to previous plans, this year it was supposed to be commissioned and build tankers and gas carriers with might and main ... But the contractors left, the crisis and sanctions made their own adjustments in terms and cost, and the date for laying nuclear super-icebreakers of unprecedented displacement, cost and power GEM, for some reason did not revise.
          Why
          Was Medvedev so sure of the success and readiness of the GCC?
          So now he does not answer for his mistakes!
          He never answered for them.
          Or is it really too fat for the jackpot? Snatch the order, and the grass does not grow?
          After all, is it not customary for us to answer for the assigned business?
          How to lay an icebreaker this year if the dock is not ready for it yet?
          People are not trained and do not qualify even for the construction of gas carriers!
          How can one tackle such complexity?
          You yourself saw how the first building was docked on the Zvezda! There, only the bow was built on the spot, and from 2/3 to 3/4 of the entire hull with the main mechanisms and the power plant were built in Korea, delivered to the floating dock and only docked on the Zvezda!
          There at the GCC there are still a lot of Korean consultants and instructors, technologists and craftsmen, without whom the work of POCA is impossible without.
          CVD needs a buildup on orders that are simpler and more accessible to its qualifications, at least 2 - 3 years. And only then can work on the "Leader" begin. And not before!
          Otherwise, there will again be embarrassment, unfinished and ... appropriate quality.
          So I would not be happy about the upcoming bookmark, it would be better to first launch at least five ice-class tanker hulls and bring the shipyard to the appropriate condition, or, to put it, to finish building.
          And educate people.
          With respect to your competence in this matter.
    10. +2
      April 22 2020 16: 25
      The contract is prepared. So all technologies are available. There will be jobs. The Far Eastern region of the country will develop. And this is already good. One can only hope for great demand from shippers on this route ...
    11. 0
      April 22 2020 16: 25
      Quote: Thrifty
      Our engine, "Rosatom" !!!

      as I understand it, Rosatom is a reactor, and the traction engine is electric? which burned in the Arctic?
    12. 0
      April 22 2020 16: 30
      Quote: Pvi1206
      The contract is prepared. So all technologies are available. There will be jobs, the Far Eastern region of the country will develop

      and most importantly, there will be, will be, and nothing - is already there. and what will happen, we have already heard more than once, I especially remember 25 million high-tech jobs. and nothing. so it will be now
    13. +3
      April 22 2020 16: 30
      and the state corporation "Rosatom" are ready to pee


      In the sense: "It is written with a pitchfork on the water"?

      The author, maybe the "letter" fuse?
    14. -4
      April 22 2020 16: 38
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Under the "Leader" construction of a dry dock is underway at the Zvezda shipyard

      we haven’t built a dock yet, but already shouting, we’ll build an icebreaker. what will happen in 10 years when the dock is built? who will be imprisoned, who will be awarded? and will this icebreaker be needed then?
      1. +2
        April 22 2020 16: 41
        Quote: aglet
        we haven’t built a dock yet, but already shouting, we’ll build an icebreaker. what will happen in 10 years when the dock is built? who will be imprisoned, who will be awarded? and will this icebreaker be needed then?

        Well, the open outfitting berth of the Zvezda shipbuilding complex has already been built. The dry dock will also be completed in the future. The photo shows an Afromax-class tanker being completed on an open outfitting slipway, judging by the position of the floating dock, the tanker will soon be launched.
        1. +6
          April 22 2020 16: 46
          Is this the one that was 80% built in Korea and is being completed on the star?
          1. +2
            April 22 2020 16: 50
            Yes, while the technologies are being worked out. "Zvezda" is still under construction itself.
    15. -2
      April 22 2020 17: 02
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Dry dock will also be completed in the future

      and when will this future come?
    16. -7
      April 22 2020 17: 08
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Yes, while the technologies are being worked out. "Zvezda" is still under construction itself.

      In November 1945, the Council of People's Commissars decided to build a ship repair plant No. 892. how much can you work out? first we’ll destroy it to the ground, and then we’ll start building, isn’t it? That is, the plant is still being built, and even it is not able to build a dry dock?
      1. 0
        April 22 2020 21: 58
        Quote: aglet
        and is he even unable to build a dry dock?

        Shipyards are not intended for the construction of dry docks. They must build ships.
    17. -1
      April 22 2020 20: 16
      This is a triumph of Russian shipbuilding! Worthy atomic contemporary
      atomic "grandfather Lenin"
      1957 year. And a worthy cause
      for the new Far Eastern
      shipyards. These giants
      how to build, greatly change
      North Sea Chart
      ways.
    18. +1
      April 23 2020 09: 48
      Somewhere in the shipyards of Italy and Germany, smile joyfully, waiting for new orders for superyachts from customers from Russia?
    19. 0
      April 23 2020 13: 29
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Shipyards are not intended for the construction of dry docks.

      and who should build docks? as I understand it, dry dock, they are still floating, and drowning quickly is part of the shipyard, something like an assembly shop, that is, there is no dock, no plant?
    20. 0
      April 23 2020 13: 31
      Quote: Doccor18
      These giants
      how to build, much

      not how they will build, but if they build, it will be more accurate

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"