The submarine of the Northern Fleet "St. Petersburg" arrived for modernization


Diesel-electric submarine "St. Petersburg" North fleet arrived in Kronstadt for scheduled maintenance and modernization. Before that, she made a long transition from the Barents Sea to the Baltic.


This was reported in the press service of the Northern Fleet.

Work with the submarine will be carried out at the Leningrad Naval Base. To get to the repair site, on April 7, the boat, together with the Pamir towing vessel, left the naval base on the Kola Peninsula.

The submarine "St. Petersburg" refers to the project 677 (code "Lada"), which they began to create in the Central Design Bureau "Rubin". The tasks of the boat include the destruction of surface and submarine ships and ships, the protection of naval bases and coastal zones, the detection of enemy submarines, reconnaissance measures. She is able to act in the middle and near sea zone. To complete the tasks the submarine has the latest missile, mine and torpedo weapons.

"St. Petersburg" is considered the lead ship in its series. The laying of the submarine took place in 1997, and its fleet was handed over in 2010.

The submarine is part of the submarine compound in the Kola Flotilla.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrifty April 20 2020 17: 26 New
    • 8
    • 6
    +2
    “Gauges” to “Zircons” change it? ?? lol Minusators - I'm just kidding negative !!!
    1. Zastupnik April 20 2020 17: 42 New
      • 14
      • 12
      +2
      Quote: Thrifty
      “Gauges” to “Zircons” change it? ?? lol Minusators - I'm just kidding negative !!!

      And they don’t care, they already have a conveyor belt .. There is nothing to do on the udalenka and protestors are not allowed into the swamp .. Here they are crap quietly here!
      Well, nothing, it's even interesting. laughing
    2. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 17: 53 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Today there is more interesting news about the submarine fleet. Impressive speed of Khabarovsk, like the submarines of hunters. Si Wolfe has 35 knots, Virginia has 34 knots of the latest modifications. Khabarovsk has 32 knots according to rumors. In addition, the project 09851 is closer to Yasen-M, certainly not for the functions of 971 projects created it?
      The nuclear submarine of project 09851 Khabarovsk, which will be the carrier of Poseidon submarine drones, will be launched in April-May, RIA Novosti writes April 20, citing sources in the military-industrial complex.

      It is noted that the test of the submarine will last two years.


      The construction of Khabarovsk-class submarines is carried out by Sevmash. The exact characteristics of the submarines of project 09851 are still not disclosed. According to sources, the displacement is about 10 thousand tons, the speed is 32 knots.

      http://in24.org/technology/39173
      1. Bashkirkhan April 20 2020 18: 24 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Khabarovsk has 32 nodes according to rumors. In addition, in terms of project size 09851 is closer to Yasen-M, wasn’t it created for functions of 971 projects?

        Khabarovsk was created for the Main Directorate of Deep-Water Research. This is the elite of submariners, aquanauts. Relate as astronauts to pilots. With 971, the project is nothing in common, in terms of capabilities - a huge difference.
        1. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 18: 30 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Shchuki-B has a speed of 33 knots and 10500 tons of underwater displacement, for example, I told you. Compare with the technical characteristics of Khabarovsk. This unwittingly leads to thoughts. Again, it was laid in July 2014 together with Yasen-M and Borey-A.
      2. g1v2 April 20 2020 19: 07 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Khabarovsk is a submarine carrier. It is the carrier of various underwater drones. Both Poseidons and reconnaissance, scientific and percussion. But honestly, such a high speed with such dimensions is poorly believed. Yes, and why? He can launch drones at a great distance - he does not need to come close to the danger zone. request
        1. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 19: 32 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: g1v2
          Khabarovsk is a submarine carrier. It is the carrier of various underwater drones. Both Poseidons and reconnaissance, scientific and percussion. But honestly, such a high speed with such dimensions is poorly believed. Yes, and why? He can launch drones at a great distance - he does not need to come close to the danger zone. request

          That's exactly why. Compare the performance characteristics of Khabarovsk with the performance characteristics of hunters' submarines. For Virginia, the surface displacement is indicated.
          Displacement of Virginia submarines reaches 7800 tons, length - 115 meters. They are able to develop under water speeds of up to 34 knots. The maximum immersion depth is about 500 meters. The crew of the submarine - 134 people, including 14 officers. The submarine type "Virginia" is equipped with four 533-mm torpedo tubes. Ammunition - 37 torpedoes and missiles "Tomahawk."

          Multipurpose submarines "Virginia" are designed to combat ships and submarines of the enemy at large and shallow depths.

          https://flot.com/2020/%D0%A1%D1%88%D0%B0105/

          Displacement Pike-B
          above water 8150 / underwater 10500
          Surface speed 10 knots / underwater 33 knots.
          https://soldat.pro/2018/07/02/proekt-971-shyka-b-atomnye-podvodnye-lodki/
      3. Grits April 21 2020 08: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Sea Wolf has 35 knots, Virginia has 34 knots of the latest modifications. Khabarovsk has 32 rumors

        At this speed, it will boom on the polocean. And the operation of the reactor at full power - with all the delights of this.
        And most importantly - why such a specific boat such speed?
        1. Boa kaa April 21 2020 11: 26 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Colleague, hi
          1. In such moves "run" only on a measured line.
          2. At full power, a reactor (NPP) may only be used in war. In peacetime, a maximum of 80% of the nominal value (at least we had it), but the fuel burns out very quickly, so without special need no one will force a “pot”.
          3. This speed is needed by a submarine for deployment in an open-air missile base across the ocean, for example, or for an early adoption of a new position. But this doesn’t mean at all that you are rushing “having a bite of the lot”, the schedule is torn: for some time it’s 20–25 knots, and then you wiggle and listen to the feed KU (sniff the tail). Then forward again. But always, if time permits, everyone tries to go as low as possible, (until the light comes on). With increasing depth, it grows.
          4. What now? Today, Gini (Block IV) switched to full electro-vision, so up to 20,0 knots go at "operational" speed, when their own noise still allows you to hear the enemy. Our 885 - up to 9,0 knots (normal search) go under electric movement and are also quiet and everyone can hear perfectly around.
          Bottom line: speed, being the most important operational and tactical indicator of a submarine, varies widely and has different levels (low noise, search, maximum low noise, operational, maximum) and varies depending on the course depth and hydrology of the sea in the area.
    3. g1v2 April 20 2020 19: 09 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      St. Petersburg 10 years in trial operation. As a result of it, changes were made to the Frets under construction. Now we need to bring the head submarine itself to the level of serial under construction. I think after modernization, the trial operation of St. Petersburg will finally end. request
      1. Boa kaa April 20 2020 23: 03 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: g1v2
        I think after modernization, the trial operation of St. Petersburg will finally end.

        Maybe they’ll put something “non-volatile” ... Because a couple of times our media croaked that we are ready to supply submarines with VNEU to the Indians. In addition, the P-705B seems to be ready with VNEU. Therefore, it would be logical to work out what happened on an already running unit before putting the installation on serial boats.
        Ahead of db series of 6-10 Kalin. And they are not needed without VNEU and new energy storage devices in the sea.
        Something like this, however, "I kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
        1. g1v2 April 21 2020 00: 08 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          They won’t deliver. Well it is necessary to redo the project. There will be an order from the Indians - they are boosting the work on VNEU. Frets will be clearly without her. In Kalin, work will obviously continue for a long time - while the Lada has been brought up to the level of readiness for serial production, In the year 22, they promise to lay the next couple. Chevron Kalina another 5 years work will go. And only then bookmarks. request
          Well, about the "not needed" I do not agree. To close bastions in the Barents and Okhotsk Seas just DEPLs are very necessary. We have not so much Apple to spend it on it, if cheaper DAPs do this very well. request Yes, and in the Baltic States it is necessary to build a dap and Lada there is more profitable than the Warsaw because of the much smaller size with the same opportunities. Yes, and the noise promise less. At the Black Sea Fleet, I would also order 6 more, in order to have an advantage over the Turks. Yes, in Tartus then you can constantly keep several pieces and do not constantly drive for "repair". Of course you can and Varshavyanka, but Lada is better. And halibuts in all fleets will need to be changed over time. Their modernization is now clear that it turned out to be meaningless - it’s easier, faster and cheaper to set up new Warsaw women. And if, in a couple of years, Lada will begin to build as the Warsaw ladies are now - it’s generally excellent. hi
          1. Boa kaa April 21 2020 11: 47 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: g1v2
            They won’t deliver. Well it is necessary to redo the project.

            If you have something to install, they will install it, and the project does not need to be redone, because It was immediately designed under VNEU. They will cut the section, as the French did with MESMA, calculate buoyancy and send it to the landfill. So almost all boat manufacturers do. Any whim of the customer, only pay the money.
        2. Alex777 April 21 2020 12: 39 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Maybe a thread "non-volatile" will put ...

          Without VNEU, our fleet does not need Lada. IMHO.
          The most promising topic is lithium-ion batteries.
          With them you can provide underwater speed of up to 20 knots.
          And they charge many times faster than conventional batteries.
          All other VNEU give from 3 to 6 nodes of underwater travel.
          The Japanese Soryu transferred to this decision. But it required a change in the entire electrical circuit of the boat.
          And there was no need to embed anything - even a place was vacated.
  2. Zastupnik April 20 2020 17: 40 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    Before that, she made a long transition from the Barents Sea to the Baltic.

    The duty conditions are complicated! Well, I hope they will make it "sweetie" again and into battle .. hi
    1. Mouse April 20 2020 18: 19 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      only the feathers will be cleaned ... and again in the ranks !!! yes
      1. Zastupnik April 20 2020 18: 28 New
        • 2
        • 7
        -5
        Quote: Mouse
        only the feathers will be cleaned ... and again in the ranks !!! yes

        Well, God forbid, so be it .. And then some sort of diversion will be arranged, as usual now ..
        1. Mouse April 20 2020 18: 32 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          oh well ... brothers work! yes
          1. Zastupnik April 20 2020 20: 00 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Quote: Mouse
            oh well ... brothers work! yes

            They work of course, but they need to be strengthened by machine gunners .. And then again some kind of fire, etc.
      2. antivirus April 21 2020 10: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        a small spoon will be cleaned - and it will sparkle the envy of partners
  3. Keeping April 20 2020 17: 52 New
    • 8
    • 23
    -15
    During the modernization, incandescent bulbs will be replaced by LEDs in the compartments ...
    1. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 18: 02 New
      • 8
      • 7
      +1
      Would you rather think about how to get the country out of the crisis, and not joke here, but Comrade Zelensky?
  4. Mouse April 20 2020 18: 13 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    when a tired submarine from the depths
    come home....
    1. Masha April 20 2020 18: 39 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Mouse
      from the depth
      come home....

      1. tlauicol April 21 2020 06: 53 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        She walked on the surface
  5. rudolff April 20 2020 18: 28 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    Anniversary, however. Ten years in trial operation and still can not bring to mind. And this is without any VNEU there.
    1. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 18: 44 New
      • 5
      • 7
      -2
      Project 677 submarines brought to mind you will see next year, when the first two production ones are handed over to the fleet. They will be different from St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, on the other hand, is the main submarine, and the main one, by tradition, is very different from the serial ones brought to mind. The same story was with Severodvinsk, from which Kazan is very different, the Borey project from Borey-A is also very different. And St. Petersburg will be cured of childhood diseases.
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 20 2020 18: 55 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Project 677 submarines brought to mind you will see next year, when the first two serial

        Alas, this is far from a fact.
      2. rudolff April 20 2020 19: 34 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        Your example is not very successful. On good, the serial ship should not differ from the lead one. The circumstances were different. In the case of Severodvinsk, during its long-term construction, many design bureaus, research institutes, factories either ceased to exist or eked out such a miserable existence that they could not give anything out. The project was actually rolled back, making a hybrid of Ash and Pike B. Ash M, this is the ship that was originally conceived, taking into account new technological realities. A similar situation is with Borey. Borea A, this is the original project. But really advanced forward, it is slaughtered Borey B.
        The fact that Lada will be completed on a modernized project started talking even under Vysotsky and precisely for the simple reason that St. Petersburg ruined all the trials and hasty attempts to bring the boat to mind did not lead to anything. If this repair with modernization does not lead to anything, the project has a large and bold cross. What will be done with these two serial, I can not even imagine.
        1. Sky strike fighter April 20 2020 19: 40 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          But really advanced forward, it is slaughtered Borey B.

          They say that Borey B was not much different from Borey-A, so they decided not to bother once again. From your words it turns out that the differences are radical, can you explain how the projects differ?
          1. rudolff April 20 2020 21: 22 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Borey B was not allowed to work because of his horse price tag. With the same success, it would be possible to embed an SLBM bay in Ash-tree M.
            I will not venture to discuss specific differences. Only a few months passed from the statement by Gerasimov about the start of work on the project to the message that Borea B would not be. In fact, they didn’t even have time to start sketch design. There were only suggestions for the appearance of the ship. Quite bold proposals.
            1. mvg
              mvg April 21 2020 01: 05 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Borey B was not allowed to work because of his horse price tag.

              it would be in Ash M embed a bay with SLBM

              What nonsense, but I stuck a plus sign for you ... ((The price tags differ by more than 2 times, and to “force” a strategist to deal with MAPL tasks, this is on the verge ... If only they would read how the first Boreas were built, “from the coven - sweetie. ”A bunch of Northwind + Mace, to put it mildly, is not the most successful.
              1. rudolff April 21 2020 07: 07 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                I do not quite understand what you wanted to say and what is the nonsense? The fact that Borey was blinded from what was, I wrote above. Much has come from the backlog of boats of the previous generation. And not only case elements, but also individual units, assemblies, complexes. Here Borey A is already close to the original project (with the Mace).
                Borey B did not give a green light because his price tag approached Ash. I did not write anything about making a strategist get involved in the tasks of the ICAPL. But the idea of ​​an almost complete unification of the SSBNs and the ICAPL, when they differ only in the weapons module, has existed for a long time. In part, they wanted to implement this in Yasen and Borei, and did not abandon this idea when designing the Husky. I don’t want to give my assessment of this idea, it's too debatable. Including, and in terms of the cost of the SSBN.
                As for the Mace-Borea ligament, everything that has been expressed has already been expressed. I personally think that Bark should have been brought up. Well, or listen to the proposal made by GREC Makeev in the early twenties to replace the Mace with R-29 RMU3 Sineva 2 with a dry start.
                You can always compensate for the wrong plus sign with the desired number of minuses. I do not mind.
                1. mvg
                  mvg April 21 2020 08: 43 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  You can always compensate for the wrong plus sign with the desired number of minuses

                  That's right, another plus. In addition to the cost. hi How can the strategist’s price tag get closer to the MAPL price tag, due to what?
                  1. Boa kaa April 21 2020 12: 14 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: mvg
                    How can the strategist’s price tag get closer to the MAPL price tag, due to what?

                    Maxim, everything from the evil one.
                    If we consider the "carriers", then APRK is 1/4 more expensive than rpkSN. But if we take the WEAPON SYSTEM, which includes the cost of the beater, then no strike submarine can be compared with Nut and its 24 Tridents. Even Jimmy Carter (4,4 Lard - the last of the Wolves) will not pull. Comparing platforms is about the same as comparing the sheath of a broadsword and a two-handed sword.
    2. Bashkirkhan April 20 2020 18: 45 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Ten years passed so quickly. I remember 2010 the submarine of the B-380 submarine of the Black Sea Fleet was placed in the floating dock for repair. Last year, mussel collectors scraped holes in the plating of the floating dock and the incredibly epic repair finally stopped. B-380 is now in Inkerman. This year I hope to go down in history.
      1. rudolff April 20 2020 19: 10 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Yes, along with the floating dock. But this case was quite expected. What were you hoping for ..?
        1. Bashkirkhan April 21 2020 12: 26 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          They did not know how to get the B-380 out of the floating dock without drowning it. There were plans to tow the PD-16 from the B-380 to a larger floating dock and cut them together. While they thought, there was a flooding of the pontoon connecting the mooring wall with the float dock PD-16. After the sunken pontoon was lifted and towed to the opposite side of the bay, it was decided to conduct an additional survey of the bottom in this area. To do this, the trophy ship “Hela” of the German submarine forces was removed from the southern bay and butchered in Inkerman (in the USSR it was called the “Angara”). The study found large fragments of the flooded old ships that were raised. Then drowned flooding PD-16. To date, work has resumed on the floating dock PD-16, which has sunk in the southern bay of Sevastopol. A pontoon is attached to the dock, onto which the cladding elements of the submarine B-380 are unloaded from the slipway deck PD.

  6. Victor March 47 April 20 2020 20: 16 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    Would you rather think about how to get the country out of the crisis, and not joke here, but Comrade Zelensky?

    Yes, they are trained only to play the piano, it is known what. And to steer the economy ....- you just need to stand on the hood and do only what the viewer orders. They will order to sell the land, they will sell it.
  7. Chaldon48 April 21 2020 02: 17 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The latest boat was dragged in tow. In order to save motor resources?
    1. rudolff April 21 2020 08: 10 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Not in tow. Under its own power in the water position. SBS Pamir accompanied.
  8. magadan72 April 21 2020 11: 35 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Already submarines at the transitions are accompanied by rescue tugboats ??? !!! ....