US authorities will provide 300 billion support for small businesses

105

Soon, the US authorities plan to provide additional support to small businesses. To do this, they will allocate 300 billion dollars.

This was told by CNN, citing US Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin.



US business support measures are triggered by the effects of the coronavirus pandemic.

The head of the Ministry of Finance is confident that today the Senate will approve the allocation of financial assistance to small businesses, and the US House of Representatives will approve this decision tomorrow.

Mnuchin believes the amount allocated is sufficient to protect the US small business from collapse:

According to our estimates, $ 300 billion should be enough to get almost everything.

In addition, the Small Business Administration could receive $ 50 billion in loans for emergency loans.

According to the Reuters news agency, Donald Trump also initiated the provision of additional financial assistance to individual states and authorities in the regions. To bring this idea to life, a bill was introduced in the US Congress. These funds should help states overcome the effects of coronavirus.

Shortly before that, American authorities decided to channel $ 2 trillion to stimulate the country's economy.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    105 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -10
      April 20 2020
      It's good to have your own printing press)))
      1. -14
        April 20 2020
        Who is your post directed to? Old Man or RFU? And that is vague doubts :)
        1. +15
          April 20 2020
          Who is your post directed to? Old Man or RFU? And that is vague doubts :)

          Old Man? I don’t have a father, he died twenty years ago, and he didn’t have a printing press.
          RFU? And from which side is the Russian Football Union?
          Have you definitely read the article?
      2. -9
        April 20 2020
        Quote: Rich
        It's good to have your own printing press)))

        Not good, but wonderful!
        But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!
        1. +17
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Victor_B
          Quote: Rich
          It's good to have your own printing press)))

          Not good, but wonderful!
          But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!

          That our printing press has broken down or is the US banned? Or maybe the little egg is over? Or maybe the government refers to the NWF as to its property. There are a lot of questions, the actions of our government are strange, in fact, as always ..
          1. +13
            April 20 2020
            Quote: Svarog
            That our printing press has broken down or is the US banned?

            You will still laugh, but it is the Fed that allows it.
            Roughly of course, but rubles can only be reprinted depending on how much (at the exchange rate) the foreign currency received in the Central Bank.
            Our constitution is a translation from English. The project.
            1. +13
              April 20 2020
              Quote: Victor_B
              You will still laugh, but it is the Fed that allows it.

              But didn’t we overcome the dependence on the dollar? Here, many say that we are not dependent on the dollar or on the United States .. apparently mistaken .. import substitution failed. Now everyone will fully see what actually has been done in 20 years ..
              1. +5
                April 20 2020
                Quote: Svarog
                But didn’t we overcome the dependence on the dollar?

                And where does the dollar?
                The receipt of any currency. Even yuan and rupees.
                The law on the Central Bank says it. The Central Bank is not subordinate to either the president or parliament, and according to the charter it has no right to print rubles as much as necessary, only "in exchange" for the currency received.
                1. +6
                  April 20 2020
                  Quote: Victor_B
                  The Law on the Central Bank states it. Central Bank is not subordinate to either the president or parliament

                  Can you tell me who proposes the candidacy of the head of the Central Bank and the composition of observers from the state, as well as who approves them? Another issue is that according to that law, the Central Bank is not responsible for the state's debts and does not issue loans to the state to cover the budget deficit. But even here there are loopholes allowing the use of the Central Bank's funds through the issuance of loans to "supposedly" private banks. And through them, use these funds for all sorts of projects.
                  Quote: Victor_B
                  has no right to print rubles as much as necessary, only "in exchange" for the currency received.
                  But this is already true. The Central Bank buys on the exchange dollars received from exports, providing for these dollars Russian rubles, which the Government uses domestically or holds in reserve.
                  All this, of course, does not seem to be correct and, most likely, from the point of view of sovereignty, it is. But this allows our enterprises to openly trade their shares in the global financial market, to attract credit, etc. At least simplified, as I see this situation, although I understand that the real system is much more complicated.
            2. +2
              April 20 2020
              Roughly of course, but rubles can only be reprinted depending on how much (at the exchange rate) the foreign currency received in the Central Bank.
              not only oble, but also any other currency, I do not understand what in this case you do not like. Have you heard something about inflation and the dire consequences of issuing unsecured money? But what does the Fed have to do with it?
              1. 0
                April 20 2020
                - We often hear that the ruble is pegged to the dollar. That is, rubles are printed depending on the dollar. How it's done? Does the Central Bank command Goznak to print so many rubles?
                - Goznak prints as much as the Central Bank orders. The Central Bank stores these printing products and throws it and electronic money into circulation. As much as the Central Bank buys currencies. We have the only channel for the receipt of rubles - through the purchase and sale of foreign currency.
                Read more on
                https://www.pravda.ru/economics/1242459-katasonov/

                "Lenta.ru": Please comment on the two numbers you are talking about. First: Russia pays the United States a "tribute" of a billion dollars a day. Second: starting next year, the Russian Federation will spend a trillion rubles a year on the purchase of foreign currency. Where did this data come from?
                Evgeny Fedorov: The fact that we pay tribute has been established since 1991. This political establishment in relation to all states of the former USSR, for example, is the same in Ukraine. In addition to Belarus, Lukashenko changed the situation there, and now they have the State Bank, unlike all our Central Banks. The damage mechanism is divided into several parts. The first is the tribute mechanism itself. It works as follows: all emissions in the Russian Federation are carried out only in a single-channel manner - through the repurchase of the dollar and euro, less often pounds and yen, on the currency exchange by the Central Bank.
                The following process occurs: the Russian exporter sold his goods (oil, gas, metallurgical products or whatever) and received dollars for it. The company exchanged part of the money in Russia for rubles from an importer who imports some goods into the country, and the Central Bank bought the second part of the dollars by issuing rubles. The company directed these rubles to workers and to maintain business in Russia. Here's what happened: the exporter sold real goods, and the proceeds of the dollar ended up in Russian foreign exchange reserves (Gold and foreign currency reserves).

                https://miccro.livejournal.com/85680.html
                1. +4
                  April 20 2020
                  And how does this not fit in with what I wrote above?
                  Attentively, it is possible according to syllables, re-read your own copy-paste.
              2. +2
                April 20 2020
                And why do you think that the ruble should be provided exclusively with foreign currency? As there was printed on the Soviet ruble - provided all property USSR?
                1. +1
                  April 20 2020
                  And why do you think that the ruble should be provided exclusively with foreign currency?
                  Note that you wrote it, not I.
                  For good, the currency should be provided not only with currency, but also with a high level of economy (growth of production and services), strategic reserves. However, Russia is too dependent both on exports (hydrocarbons and metals for the most part) and on imports (competitive foreign goods and services), and for trade it is necessary to have a lot of foreign currency.
                  How was it printed on the Soviet ruble — provided by all the property of the USSR?
                  Firstly, they also write a lot of things on fences, but not everything is worth believing. We do not live in a fairy tale, words without confirmation - an empty phrase.
                  Secondly, the Union was just an ideal example of how the economy cannot be built.
                  1. +1
                    April 20 2020
                    The union was just a perfect example of how the economy cannot be built.

                    Scourging - one of the two superpowers, the country that won the greatest war and the first to fly into space - turns out to have the wrong economy !! what Truly - the mysterious ways of the mind of a liberalist are inscrutable .. belay
                    1. -1
                      April 20 2020
                      I’m not flying to the cottage in the country at the spaceship, I go there by car. Now tell us how things were going with cars in a space power. Not with buckets, which were then released, namely with cars. Really scratch: orbital stations were able to do, but banal cars - no. Apparently, something was wrong with the Soviet economy.
                      1. -1
                        April 20 2020
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        Now tell us how things were going with cars in a space power. Not with buckets, which were then released, namely with cars. Really scratch: orbital stations were able to do, but banal cars - no.

                        with cars for the national economy and the army, things were fine, some of the best in the world. For cars, there was no problem making the best cars. This is a matter of party politics, not economy. There would be a task, they would do no worse than a Mercedes.
                        1. +1
                          April 20 2020
                          Cars for the army - I agree. Unpretentious and maintainable in the field. And for the national economy? Apparently, the cars were very good, if our drivers, at the first opportunity, moved to foreign trucks. Remind, on which of our main tractor was the air conditioner, had a comfortable sleeping bag, refrigerator, autonomous heater and other "little things" that brighten the life of a trucker? The "capitalist exploiters" had complete order with these buns.
                          Or Russian Van, and so it goes — the party’s policy is precisely in relation to the people.
                      2. -1
                        April 20 2020
                        So what? If you look at modern Lada cars of the same class - they weren’t very much in those days .. But - we had the best free education in the world, the best secondary medicine, free housing, and much, much more that the bourgeois never dreamed of .. But to you sausages it is up to the pager ..
                        1. +1
                          April 20 2020
                          Yeah of course. When I moved from a Lada - Six to a seven-year-old Volkswagen, I realized right away that I had no car before. There was a misunderstanding. Free housing? So it was not yours, it was not your property. And to stand with outstretched hand, when they descend to you and deign to you to allocate living space? Easier to buy.
                2. -2
                  April 20 2020
                  Therefore, the Soviet ruble was not quoted or converted outside the USSR. From the word "in general".
                  1. 0
                    April 20 2020
                    Did you have to? Why do we need free conversion - so that the best people can freely travel to their overseas estates?
                    1. -8
                      April 20 2020
                      It was necessary to. So that any person could go abroad and buy any goods, if the scoop did not bother to provide the population with quality products. At least for this. And do not change thirty for currency, such as souvenirs, fie
                      1. 0
                        April 20 2020
                        And what have we come to as a result? Yes - some part of the population can still travel abroad and buy imported clothes. But - our national money is actually not controlled by our own authorities, and incomes depend solely on the oil industry .. Because there are not enough rubles in the country, hence the extremely low solvency of the people and, as a consequence, the lack of industry .. And to influence this - the authorities can’t do anything, now it’s complete zhёppa with income from raw materials, and then - the predicted collapse .. Here is the price of your Wishlist ..
                        1. -1
                          April 20 2020
                          Was there a good deal of Soviet rubles? Money that is not secured by the mass of commodities, that is, candy wrappers. The nickname "wooden" is not given just like that. And where did you get the predicted collapse? Industry in a pandemic is even less useful than extractive industries - in the West, their vaunted industry is practically stopped and requires serious injections to support, and the one that works has no sales.
                        2. -1
                          April 20 2020
                          You do not confuse late Soviet and Stalinist times. Yes - in the last years of Brezhnev and under Judge Mechneny, they overwhelmed the money supply. For which they suffered. But until the 60s, Soviet people lived no less than the vast majority of the world's population, including in the West. If you look at their realities of the time, and not cinematic options, then we are probably better in many areas. As for industry - they have not stopped it, but stupidly handed it over to China. The Soviet one was provided with domestic demand, which was precisely stimulated by the native ruble .. And the collapse is obviously so, people didn’t have a damn anyway, and after the covers and nice tricks with the oil industry there’s nothing left to do but even not regularly .. What industry is it ..
                        3. -1
                          April 20 2020
                          I didn’t live in Stalin’s times and I can’t say anything about them, neither good nor bad. But there are numerous claims to Brezhnev’s. The closed economy is undoubtedly good for such emergency situations as a pandemic, but otherwise it is the reason for the technological backwardness that has been observed and increased in the USSR, especially in the field of consumer goods. In general, countries with a high agricultural component of the economy will best come out of this crisis. Mankind will not stop eating.
                        4. -2
                          April 20 2020
                          Well you give. Is the dollar also wooden? Or will you assure that it is provided with a mass of goods? belay
                        5. -1
                          April 20 2020
                          The dollar is the de facto world currency. And he is provided with the mass of goods of all countries that use it for mutual settlements.
                        6. 0
                          April 22 2020
                          Quote: paul3390
                          Well you give. Is the dollar also wooden? Or will you assure that it is provided with a mass of goods? belay
                          - of course, the dollar is provided with a "commodity mass" - aircraft carriers and nuclear weapons are also goods
                          And those who doubted, sooooo quickly convinced otherwise. Germany wondered, not to return !! no, just count your little gold !! Where were they sent ?? and Germany with German conscientiousness went there .... because no one was withdrawing the contingent ...
                        7. -1
                          April 22 2020
                          Quote: paul3390
                          Yes - some часть the population can still travel abroad and buy imported clothes.
                          -42 million passports, THIRD population is a "part" ?????
                    2. 0
                      April 22 2020
                      Quote: paul3390
                      Did you have to? Why do we need free conversion - so that the best people can freely travel to their overseas estates?
                      - and in order to buy, for example, large-diameter pipes for gas pipelines, do not you remember the epic "Gas-pipes" of the 1970s?
                      Or precision machines, heavy tractors, ships (yes, the Finnish "Vyartsila" did not work for rubles !!) and so on ....
                3. +2
                  April 20 2020
                  Quote: paul3390
                  And why do you think that the ruble should be provided exclusively with foreign currency? How was it printed on the Soviet ruble — provided by all the property of the USSR?

                  You just argue about different models of monetary systems. The system that existed in the USSR was closed in the domestic market. What does it mean? The state, ideally, could print as much money as it produced domestic goods. By how much a large amount on an annualized basis increased the production of goods, by how much money could be printed. But this is ideal. In fact, more was printed and, therefore, the money supply exceeded the mass of goods produced for domestic consumption. To this was added overstock, the release of unnecessary goods, etc. On the other hand, the existing foreign trade turnover made it possible to receive dollars, for which imports were purchased and debts were paid. So, the dollar-ruble exchange rate was completely different there. Roughly speaking, it was impossible at the same rate to exchange Soviet rubles for dollars, because the domestic ruble exchange rate was artificially high. It was not profitable for the state to give citizens dollars for rubles at that rate. Today's system allows you to keep the real ruble exchange rate. In any country in the world, you can exchange rubles at the existing Central Bank rate with an increase in a small commission. But this imposes great restrictions on the possibility of economic growth.
                  Both systems have their pros and cons. The Soviet system could also be conditionally tied to the real course, but then the standard of living inside the country would be lower, because there would not be such a large money supply.
                4. +2
                  April 20 2020
                  Quote: paul3390
                  And why do you think that the ruble should be provided exclusively with foreign currency? As there was printed on the Soviet ruble - provided all property USSR?

                  Soviet ruble was a non-convertible currency
                  1. -3
                    April 20 2020
                    And what? And why is it generally free to convert something? There is only one answer - to make it easier to loot from the country to the West ...
                    1. +2
                      April 20 2020
                      Quote: paul3390
                      And what? And why is it generally free to convert something? There is only one answer - to make it easier to loot from the country to the West ...

                      laughing try to open a ruble account in any, say, German bank - look at the reaction of the manager ...
                      In the case of the USSR - To buy Canadian wheat for our own money, and not to barter transactions at the Ottawa-set tariff hi
                      1. -2
                        April 20 2020
                        So I’m saying - loot money from the country .. In the case of the USSR, the private benefit would not cover a lot of the hemorrhoid associated with this for protecting the ruble .. Canada, having accumulated rubles, could easily present a huge amount for payment. Why do we need it? Easier to barter.
                        1. +1
                          April 20 2020
                          laughing
                          Since the beginning of the 70s, not a single convertible currency is tied to gold
                          What loot from the country to rub - the ruble account you will not open anywhere in the West
              3. -1
                April 20 2020
                What are you all about inflation? In the 90s there was no money, but inflation was beyond the limit! And? ... why is the US not afraid of inflation?
                1. -1
                  April 20 2020
                  In the 90s there was no money, but inflation was beyond the limit!
                  I mean, there was no money ... have you really forgotten how you got your salary in the millions? And all because the criminal government artificially poured more money into the circulation than the level of the economy allowed, and thus the lawful robbery of the people took place.
                  Why is the US not afraid of inflation?
                  Why should they be afraid? Inflation, it is like swiping your head against the wall ... you can beat your head and not be afraid, but you can be afraid, but not fight ... Here, everyone decides for himself.
                2. 0
                  April 20 2020
                  Very much even afraid. You can find a bunch of devastating articles from prominent economists of our planet about the so-called "quantitative easing" (printing dollars). But nevertheless, the United States periodically throws in money, apparently because 1) it does not know how to do it differently 2) it gives a positive result.
                  Why we cannot also is a matter of philosophical character. If we discard the thesis that our economists in power are utter mediocrity (I believe this is still untrue), then the only reasonable explanation remains the total dependence of our economy on the export of resources. Pouring the economy of consumption with money can be relatively painless, and the economy of the export of minerals is fraught with difficult to predict consequences.
                  1. +3
                    April 20 2020
                    The Fed has three mechanisms for influencing inflation:
                    1. Requirements for required reserves.
                    2. The discount rate.
                    3. Operations in open markets.
                    About printing bucks, if you are really interested, the Fed can issue only cash and only printed money, while leaving the Ministry of Finance a guarantee equal to the nominal value of this money. If it’s really interesting, you can even see how many dollars the engraving and printing bureau issued by order of the Fed. https: //www.federalreserve.gov/default.htm now see the column of monetary aggregates M1, from that year to the present. it will turn out somewhere 260 billion eternally green throughout the year. that the GDP of sworn friends is about 21.3 trillion dollars. all of them know how to do well without a printing press.
            3. -1
              April 20 2020
              Quote: Victor_B
              Quote: Svarog
              That our printing press has broken down or is the US banned?

              You will still laugh, but it is the Fed that allows it.
              Roughly of course, but rubles can only be reprinted depending on how much (at the exchange rate) the foreign currency received in the Central Bank.
              Our constitution is a translation from English. The project.

              Well they will not print. They would give people, as someone, bonuses, to whom as aid, to whom as subsidies. People would go to spend that money on lemons and ginger ... and demand would spur a stagnant economy. So what's the catch?
            4. 0
              April 20 2020
              But the question is, does this also apply to the states, or are they here exclusively what we want?
            5. 0
              April 21 2020
              Can I have proofs?
          2. +1
            April 20 2020
            We have a pre-quarantine state! It means almost quarantine, but we won’t give money to the people. It's their money, not ours
        2. +4
          April 20 2020
          But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!
          Don’t worry, these 300 lard will come to the Russian Federation as inflation, but someone else must pay for this holiday of unprecedented generosity.
          1. -2
            April 20 2020
            Quote: Threaded Screw
            But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!
            Don’t worry, these 300 lard will come to the Russian Federation as inflation, but someone else must pay for this holiday of unprecedented generosity.

            And here without a doubt ..
          2. +4
            April 20 2020
            Quote: Threaded screw
            these 300 lards will come to Russia as inflation

            Why only in the Russian Federation? This money, as inflation, will come to the economy of the whole world. And the fact that Russia is not the largest of the economies, in this case, is a big plus, no matter how all the economic proponents moan here and the guardians of "Mother Russia" that everything is so bad. So, should the constitution be rewritten? Or will Russia (with the rest) continue to cover the American "printing press?"
            1. 0
              April 20 2020
              Why only in the Russian Federation? This money, as inflation, will come to the economy of the whole world.
              Undoubtedly, just the rest are discussing this in their forums.
              Or will Russia (with the rest) continue to cover the American "printing press?"
              Russia will cover the American "printing press" with the rest!
        3. 0
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Victor_B
          Quote: Rich
          It's good to have your own printing press)))

          Not good, but wonderful!
          But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!

          Russia is not without anything. There is a printing press, but the possibilities are limited by the scale of the economy.
          And it is possible to print, only few people accept rubles abroad of Russia.
          And everyone takes the dollar, for now.
          Feel the difference, as they say.
        4. +1
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Victor_B
          But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!


          In the "blessed" 90s, we decided to become a full member of the so-called. the civilized world. We fully accepted the rules of the game, tied our economy to dollars, as a result of privatization we distributed the national property into whose hands it is not clear, and have done a bunch of things that we regret now.
      3. +1
        April 20 2020
        But Russia does not have a printing press?

        Well done in the USA, pouring money into the economy. We are waiting for domestic injections into the Russian economy.

        I wish ... Sakhipzadovna resigned ... I dreamed in the morning)))
        1. +1
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          But Russia does not have a printing press?

          Well done in the USA, pouring money into the economy.

          To say does not mean"pour".. They say a lot but do little - everything is too simple for you .. This is more chatter for the media and calming "your" audience .. We also have a printing press, but you forget that the ruble and the dollar are different currencies and the rubles are citizens of most countries unfortunately for a rainy day they are not kept under the pillow. But the United States will not print more than it can handle.
          It’s also possible to flood our economy with rubles, but it’s unlikely that subsequent inflation will please you ..
          1. 0
            April 20 2020
            They say a lot but do little about Russia
          2. +1
            April 20 2020
            -Matvey: and the United States will not print more than they can digest.
            The Fed is printing .And more dollars (if you follow the news) are needed, as once, by the IMF.
          3. 0
            April 20 2020
            The United States will not print more than it can digest.
            For the United States, other countries will digest the money supply.
          4. 0
            April 20 2020
            Quote: seti
            To say does not mean to pour in.

            I’m wanging that they will not give out money for free, only loans. In Russia, too, we have gone this way.
            1. +2
              April 20 2020
              I wang that they will not give out money for free
              The usual practice in the United States is to distribute and then pour out more cheap loans. They will receive an increase in demand and production, then they will seize the excess money supply and send it to the countries of the world through market and financial mechanisms. As a result, in the US, demand and production are growing, while the "non-people" have inflation, roughly speaking, the WORLD will pay for the financial well-being of the US population.
              1. +1
                April 20 2020
                Quote: Threaded screw
                The usual practice in the USA will be handed out then they will pour more cheap loans.

                Well, in the Russian Federation they also offer interest-free loans to entrepreneurs to maintain their pants, only the trick is that the dormant office will stupidly eat them up, but you still need to give them away, then you need to consider the profitability - it will pull or not, which is complicated by the uncertainty of the downtime. In some cases, it is better not to accept such assistance, to close and then start from scratch again will be cheaper.
                This is true on both sides of the ocean.

                In Russia, it will hit the most "smart" ones hardest of all, here is not the decaying west, there are a lot of such pretzels:

                What, in a stump, "money supply"? This is reality, without these smart words of yours.
                1. -1
                  April 20 2020
                  Well, in the Russian Federation they also offer interest-free loans to entrepreneurs
                  It is completely pointless to compare the processes in the US and Russian economies and this is not a joke. For the actions of the Russian Federation, the Russian Federation will pay, for the actions of the United States others will pay. Therefore, what is good for America does not mean well for the rest.
                  1. -2
                    April 20 2020
                    Quote: Threaded screw
                    processes in the US and Russian economies are fundamentally pointless

                    Tell the owner of a hairdressing salon or cafe, whether it’s Russian or American, that it’s the Russian Federation and the United States that they will pay for it with loans - at least cheer up a person. smile
                    1. -1
                      April 20 2020
                      To the owner of a hairdresser or cafe, it does not matter
                      Just as important, do not worry about the Americans, they will be fine, I promise.
                      1. -3
                        April 20 2020
                        Quote: Threaded screw
                        Just as important, don’t worry about the Americans, they’ll be fine,

                        Yes, I don’t worry, each hut has its own toys.
        2. -1
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          We are waiting for domestic injections into the Russian economy.

          Already pouring. Even bookmakers sprinkle.
        3. -2
          April 20 2020
          Our government is also pouring considerable resources into supporting the economy and helping those in need, in percentage terms even more than in the USA.
        4. -1
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          But Russia does not have a printing press?

          Well done in the USA, pouring money into the economy. We are waiting for domestic injections into the Russian economy.

          I wish ... Sakhipzadovna resigned ... I dreamed in the morning)))

          And what was her for? A woman works day and night. Regularly reports on the "work" done :)
        5. +1
          April 20 2020
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          Well done in the USA, pouring money into the economy. We are waiting for domestic injections into the Russian economy.

          You don't know much about the financial mechanisms in the United States. What are the good fellows? What is pumping trillions into the economy? No matter how it is. Where did the money come from? Money only works when it is earned, and not when it is printed out of thin air .. All these billions will remain in the accounts of the largest banks and financial corporations, where they will safely circulate, thereby further inflating the financial bubble and increasing the domestic national debt. If, under Reagan and in 2008, it got bummed, now such methods no longer work .. And small business in the United States, already credited for the most not spoil (just like ordinary citizens), will receive either another loan, which so you have to give, or shish with butter. They have it just, "did not fit into the market", welcome to the street. That's all the help in American style, they have no other recipes. And of course it sounds beautiful, (for the narrow-minded)
          US authorities will provide 300 billion support for small businesses
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. +4
        April 20 2020
        Especially if this machine is able to print its money for the whole world.
      7. +1
        April 20 2020
        "It's good to have your own printing press)))" and in Germany, France, Belgium in China and so on. even in Georgia they help their own citizens. So it's not about the machine.
        "Cancer cells don't help the body survive." We have two ways, either they are on or the operation ...
      8. -6
        April 20 2020
        Quote: Rich
        It's good to have your own printing press)))

        Especially when the whole world pays for it ... The US debt has already exceeded 20 trillion .. You can’t understand their rich ..
    2. +6
      April 20 2020
      The US will help its own. Do not worry about them .. It will be necessary to add another 300 billion .. And this is in a country where no one has ever just given 1 cent to another ..
      This means only one thing: The fasting times have come, brothers ...
    3. -6
      April 20 2020
      it's like giving the population 1000 bucks and then getting them to pay 1200 for the coronovirus test .... well
      1. -1
        April 20 2020
        it's like giving the population 1000 bucks
        Actually, in the United States about 1000 there is only talk on the snout, no one has given anything to anyone.
        and then get to pay for the coronovirus test 1200 .... well, well
        Accounts generally reach 60-80K
        1. -3
          April 20 2020
          Actually, in the United States about 1000 there is only talk on the snout, no one has given anything to anyone.


          70 million Americans got $ 1200 per person and $ 500 per child.

          Accounts generally reach 60-80K


          For Americans who do not have insurance, treatment for coronavirus will be free, and for Americans with insurance, treatment will be covered entirely from this insurance. This is Trump's decree.
          You have outdated information.
          1. 0
            April 22 2020
            Quote: Courier
            70 million Americans received $ 1200 per person and $ 500 per child.

            "Demonstrations against restrictive measures in connection with the spread of coronavirus have been held by residents of more than ten states in the United States," CNN reported on April 20.
            Protests were held in the states of Washington, Indiana, California, Kentucky, Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, Maryland, New Mexico, Utah. The reason for the protests is that some Americans lost their earnings due to restrictions on business activity.
            According to the channel, in the United States more than 97% of the population is in isolation at home, many organizations do not work. Organizations in many states of ASP are expected to begin reopening on May 1st. "
    4. +4
      April 20 2020
      Small business is fed directly from direct services to a person, and if shops, public catering, hairdressers and other facilities for providing services directly to a person are closed, small businesses simply have teeth on the shelf. Yesterday I saw people in Michigan rallied against quarantine and for starting this small business. Therefore, no handouts will not save him if you do not start working.
      1. -1
        April 20 2020
        That is, do you think that subsidies will not save small businesses? Do you yourself do business or did you pass by or did you hear something? Subsidies are aimed at saving the small, if not helping, then he will surely die, and this money will help to survive difficult times. Now there are very few who think about profits, the main thing is to stay with me and I will help this money. I can only envy US entrepreneurs. We have complete idiocy ....
    5. IC
      +5
      April 20 2020
      In Russia, the same will give money to Rosneft, Gazprom, VTB, etc.
      Each country has its own path. We must look at the result.
      By the way, US financial injections during the 2008-2009 crisis.
      to banks and big business, were mainly returned to the state.
    6. +4
      April 20 2020
      And with us, in order to get paid 12 tons per employee, you still have to approach the criteria. This is the difference between saving the economy and not professionalism and irresponsibility. So far we will begin to take the right measures, there will already be no one to save ....
      1. 0
        April 22 2020
        Quote: Scipio
        And with us, in order to get paid 12 tons per employee, you still have to approach the criteria.
        -and for this it is necessary that you have it (according to the documents !!) at least
    7. +1
      April 20 2020
      I repeat again, help can be one-time but not permanent and will not save anyone if you do not start working.
    8. +3
      April 20 2020
      Quote: Victor_B
      Quote: Svarog
      But didn’t we overcome the dependence on the dollar?

      And where does the dollar?
      The receipt of any currency. Even yuan and rupees.
      The law on the Central Bank says it. The Central Bank is not subordinate to either the president or parliament, and according to the charter it has no right to print rubles as much as necessary, only "in exchange" for the currency received.

      And where does it say in the Law on the Central Bank, dear?
      For example, here is how Article 1 of the Federal Law of 10.07.2002 No. 86-FZ "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)" sounds:
      Article 1. The status, objectives, functions and powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) are determined Constitution of the Russian Federation, this Federal Law and other federal laws.
      We look at the Constitution of the Russian Federation, article 75. We read paragraph 1, without climbing into the wilds:
      1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.
      Moreover, article 2 of the Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation says: "Article 2. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia shall be federal property."
      Another thing is that according to the old Russian proverb "The law is that the tongue, where you turn, goes there." But that's a completely different story.
    9. -2
      April 20 2020
      Quote: Victor_B
      Quote: Rich
      It's good to have your own printing press)))

      Not good, but wonderful!
      But Russia is deprived of such an opportunity!

      Why deprived? Print wood as you want. At the end of the 80s, Vitas were so printed that when prices freed, inflation went up like Ragozin’s spaceships without any trampolines.
    10. +4
      April 20 2020
      here it is capitalism, oppressing its people
    11. +1
      April 20 2020
      US authorities will provide 300 billion support for small businesses

      Wow! They were surprised! The Russian authorities will also support US business:
      In March of this year, Russia bought US bonds worth $ 13,5 billion and brought its investment in this asset to almost $ 100 billion.

      Of course, this is not $ 300, but we and the people are smaller and the ruble is cheaper than the dollar by more than 000 times ... wassat
    12. Ham
      -1
      April 20 2020
      in old Don’s elections on the nose ... the main thing is to be re-elected - it is a matter of life and death! on this and 300 will draw ...
      and there even grass does not grow! others will still pay
    13. +1
      April 20 2020
      It’s interesting, but they will support or even further send to the business, in a big ..? smile
    14. 0
      April 20 2020
      2 trillion 300 billion) Roughly 170 trillion rubles - not sickly
    15. 0
      April 20 2020
      Quote: Popuas
      Why is the US not afraid of inflation?

      Because they are splashing out their inflation into colonial countries. For example, to us.
    16. +1
      April 20 2020
      Quote: paul3390
      Quote: Popuas
      Why is the US not afraid of inflation?

      Because they are splashing out their inflation into colonial countries. For example, to us.


      Very interesting, but how does it work? What does it look like inflation spills out? What Russia has not splashed out its 14% per year anywhere?
    17. +1
      April 20 2020
      Fed prints bucks, then the Central Bank of the world will buy US securities
    18. +1
      April 20 2020
      Why comments about some kind of printing press? The bottom line is that asashai support their citizens in a bad situation, and the beloved RF replenishes the treasury at our expense ((((
    19. 0
      April 20 2020
      Well, less money will be left to support terrorists.
    20. Mwg
      0
      April 20 2020
      Something these 300 billion appear directly in all the news: and loans were given out to friendly countries to fight for health; and the same amount of struggle in the country; and now, it turns out, it’s the same money to support the business.
      That is, they did not print 300, but 900? Or "was there a boy"?
      1. -2
        April 20 2020
        There was a first aid package of $ 2.2 trillion. These 300 billion from there.
        Congress is currently discussing another 2.2 trillion package. When it is accepted, the third package of 2 trillion will be introduced to upgrade the infrastructure.
    21. -2
      April 20 2020
      This is a bit outdated information. The US has already allocated 300 billion, and intends to allocate another 250 billion to small businesses.
      1. -1
        April 20 2020
        In the United States, 52% of the working-age population is employed in small and medium-sized businesses, and there are practically no "gray" schemes there. And we have? In the States, small businesses account for half of the GDP. And we have? And we really have 5-7%.
        1. -2
          April 20 2020
          But SMEs create 25% of all jobs in Russia

          https://tass.ru/msp/6689099/amp
          1. +2
            April 20 2020
            So this is only according to official data. And if we take into account also the unformed ones, then somewhere we will come closer to the American indicator.
            1. -1
              April 20 2020
              And for what such beautiful eyes should the unformed be supported? Many of them were even proud that taxes were not paid to "this state"
              1. +1
                April 20 2020
                In fairness, however, you do not understand this greedy bourgeois
              2. +1
                April 20 2020
                Someone was proud that he was unregistered, while someone else was refused by the employer. Situations are different. Any business, including small ones, creates jobs, develops production, trade, services, etc. And he makes a profit, of course, that's why he exists. At the same time, business must share profits with the state so that it can finance education, health care, defense, etc. Therefore, the question is not whether to "support the unformed", but that the unregistered become formalized, work, live richly and share with the state, understanding where its money goes.
    22. -2
      April 20 2020
      We have the following help, they sent an explanation that the help didn’t concern me, and that I would pay taxes for the first quarter no later than 27.04.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX, so I’m thinking where to get them.
      They forbade me to work, and the tax, rent, and credit were not a day later.
      And I thought that we have a state, well, now they’ve clarified.
      Tereshkov, apparently, and that ..
    23. 0
      April 20 2020
      C ... damn smart move. It would be better if they muddied another child prodigy.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"