Military Review

Zuleikha does not know how to make a movie

183

A trip to life for everyone has their own ...


An amazing situation has developed in our capitalist country. Cinematographic figures who “suffered” in the “bloody” USSR, entering the free market they desired, where only the viewer decides the quality of the product, turned sour, like tomatoes in the sun. When their own artistic weakness became clear even to themselves, they began to desperately forge a new system of Russian cinema. In this system, filmmakers who stuck to the state financial flows did not receive an assessment of their work according to the opinions of the audience, not by the decision of the “bloody review commission,” not by the box office in cinemas, but by the number of figures on TV and the quality of the connections between this shop-floor brawl.

Therefore, it doesn’t matter how deeply this or that project has failed, none of the participants will “drown” and stop filming or shooting. Inside their workshop, citizens will hand out awards, praise each other and go to another restaurant to celebrate creative “success”. Thanks to the system created by the "elite" creators, the series "Zuleikha opens her eyes" appeared, which was not advertised except for the iron and the kettle.

Even before the premiere of any series, the morning program with the voices of the hosts with strained glued smiles will tell about the genius of the creation of their own company. In the session of flattering self-hypnosis, the actors themselves, and the producers, etc. will take part. This bashful bloc of self-promotion is now called corporate ethics, so you should not even wait for a drop of truthful opinion from the federal channel, which itself is interested in inflating the empty essence of this or that creation.

The creators of the next "masterpiece"


Sculpted a "masterpiece" film company "Russian". This film company is actually headed by a certain Irina Smirnova as a general producer. In 2004-2005, Smirnova studied at the magistracy of the University of London, and her dissertation was devoted to "management of creative personnel in television production." The company’s official website states that “Russkoe” has earned “truly nation-wide recognition through its stories about the fate of ordinary Russian women. ” For some reason, there was somehow no place among Russian women for either Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya, Lydia Litvyak, Evdokia Nosal, nor Maria Pedenko, nor Nadezhda Likhatskaya ... Although the author doubts that anyone in this “film company” has a serial format knows about these great women.

Zuleikha does not know how to make a movie

The director was Yegor Anashkin. Anashkin was born in 1979 in German Magdeburg in a military family (as a result, he did not serve in the army). In 2001, he graduated from Moscow State University of Service with a degree in jurisprudence. But suddenly Anashkin felt an urgent need for creativity, so in 2005 he graduated from the directing department of VGIK. Quickly enough, Anashkin trodden the track on TV, participating in the filming of third-rate TV shows and frankly flat comedies and “a la” thriller crafts.

The producers of the series was a whole team of citizens with specific baggage. For example, Anton Zlatopolsky, before Zuleiha, produced the fantastic masterpieces of Bondarchuk Jr., “Attraction” and “Invasion”, as well as “Anna Karenina” with the ubiquitous Boyarsky, “Demon of the Revolution”, etc. Another producer of the series is generally hard to characterize with his work, because he, Alexander Kushaev, produces tons of series a year. And, of course, the list of producers includes citizen Irina Smirnova.

Art fiasco


If we omit the frank political subtext of the series, then its full artistic helplessness and impotence come out. The picture was shot on the literary basis of the novel by Guzel Yakhina of the same name, which deserved high marks from Lyudmila Ulitskaya. The very Ulitskaya, who created her own “children's project”, permeated with tolerance towards gays and other citizens, entangled in their own physiology.


Guzel, who spoke positively about the series, has never been a historian (and I strongly doubt that she ever studied fundamental historical materials). She safely left Kazan and moved to Moscow in 1999, where she worked in the field of advertising and marketing. It is clear that this metropolitan lady, even if she was in a remote Tatar village in which the main character of her novel lives, is only passing through, peering out an air-conditioned car from a window. And she studied the Siberian hinterland of the Gulag, most likely, on the net. And suddenly, as if by a wave of a magic wand, a literary gift descended on her, and her "Zuleikha" became a bestseller (if you are a short-sighted person to believe in it). In short, the foundation is noble.

Plot: flat, like a fence. In 1930, a certain Zuleiha was dispossessed and sent to Siberia. Bloody enkavedeshniki walk in a parade, the irrepressible "scoop" rages, and the leader hovers over this with his satanic gaze! Already at this stage, the series is not just secondary. This is not even a semi-finished product, it is some kind of waste from the meat processing industry that can be used only for pet food.

As for the acting, here everything is not only sad, but unbearably wretched. Many of the critics, apparently out of respect for the leading singer Chulpan Khamatova, said that the young lady walks the whole film with the same face, not a bit playing as an actress. Comrades, you are deeply wrong. Chulpan Khamatova just plays, she has been playing Chulpan Khamatova for more than twenty years and no one else. Even at “72 meters” she was powdered against the background not only of Krasko and Basharov (during his adequacy), but also against the background of Nikolsky, who played the sailor Molodoy. Khamatova, with her impenetrable concrete facial expressions, has been marching through the ruins of Russian cinema for a year now. But again, thanks to a well-cut system, the lady will continue her march with the same mask of a brick wall.


Gamma of feelings

With other actor’s attempts, it’s not better, because in the film there are two human states in principle - facial expressions of Khamatova’s concrete and wild hysteria. At the same time, even men are satisfied with tantrums, but it’s cool and without excitement. Sergei Makovetsky, by the way, is a good actor, playing as if he were passing through here, and his passport was taken from him. Julia Peresild, already not shining, in a hat and on a horse looks like a lady from the American advertisement of vodka a la “Cossack style”.

However, the author may be mistaken, because the scriptwriters, having conjured with the primary principle, issued such types in which there is nothing to play. This is the problem of all anti-Soviet paintings - the reluctance to invite real consultants and turn to reality as such, not to mention historical reality.

Perhaps that is why the NKVD employees are shown in the best traditions of films from the 90s and zero. Those. an employee of the NKVD doesn’t sin by cannibalism. Due to the paranoid hatred of the series’s creators towards the history of Russia, all Chekists in the end look like cardboard villains from Class B American films. They would put the director and scriptwriters of their villains with cannibalism, hard addiction, incest and illiteracy, a thrash comedy would be provided.


Now we will eat them! You wanted to say - “we will shoot”? It is possible in this order ...

The entire series is strewn with the so-called flashbacks, when the hero is visited by "hallucinations" about his past life. It is glued so mediocre and out of place that the installation looks torn, like the flow of the picture. The latter is due to the fact that the camera work in the series is a kind of unsuccessful hybrid of rare long-scale frames with short clip frames and close-ups in the style of another cheap “soap”. It looks depressingly and hurts the eyes, as if the next "Santa Barbara" decided to give the scale of the great film strip "Sibiriada".

Came to "success"


As a result, the only life this series is capable of living is socially scandalous life, which has been a trend for decades: cinematic hackwork, scandal, television cameras and recording in a pro-Western bestiary. And, surprisingly, it all works. Over the years of campaigning, a whole cluster of flocks of anti-Soviet and even Russophobic paintings has formed.

That is why the series, shot by a failed lawyer based on the novel of a young lady who was engaged in advertising and marketing, i.e. the art of selling a layman unnecessary junk to him for money that he does not have, can be considered historical. And it doesn’t matter that the Tarantino pun “Inglourious Basterds” has the same “historicity”.

On the other hand, this is why tearful splashes of hands and false howls about a difficult fate appear, which the plebs do not understand, because it is not so finely tailored than the sensual, free and “independent” creative elites that open their eyes to someone. Although in reality, the state pocket is most often once again opened.


However, unlike other politically biased projects, the creators of Zuleiha also had an ethnic trump card up their sleeve, which they apparently hoped to play. Indeed, according to Western patterns, which were used since tsarist times, and later during the Great Patriotic War, to immerse the empire in chaos and civil strife, the image of a “Russian” was oppressed, oppressing all other peoples. Under this sauce, the Nazis, by the way, formed many national SS battalions.

But this trump card in the end slapped hard on the face of the creators of Zuleikhi themselves. Tatars in their wisdom not only did not support the series, but even spoke out with a certain amount of negativity. The fact is that a man’s neglect and hateful attitude towards his roots, his history, his ancestors ultimately leads to degradation in all areas of his life. Writers descend to the level of libel. Directors become uninterested in their own characters. Actors often scatter words in the press than on the screen. So it feels like the authors managed to do it not just standing, but not even taking off your trousers.
Author:
183 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vadim237
    Vadim237 April 21 2020 15: 10 New
    26
    Yes, there, by shooting in an advertisement, it was clear that even the operator worked on XXXXXX.
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi April 21 2020 15: 24 New
      57
      The film is really flat and template. The problem is that the authors and actors creating such films are that they themselves were never forced to overcome real difficulties in life. Can they be compared with people who themselves went through the hell of war?


      1. Varyag_0711
        Varyag_0711 April 21 2020 16: 00 New
        86
        Aron Zaawi (Aron)
        The film is really flat and template.
        You said it VERY softly. In fact, this is not a film, this is another shit-masterpiece from our shit-makers from modern cinema.
        The problem is that the authors and actors creating such films are that they themselves were never forced to overcome real difficulties in life.
        The problem is that with the collapse of the USSR and the abolition of censorship, actors, directors, scriptwriters, and even less consultants disappeared.
        The most disgusting thing is that the Soviet ACTORS, once respected by me, were blown away at one moment to the level of talentless and immoral banal actors. What have Mikhalkov, Tabakov, Dzhigarkhanyan, Akhedzhakova, Zbruev, Raikin, Basilashvili and other cinematic brothers-brothers become? Where did their talent go? Even my beloved and respected Gaidai was marked by a very mediocre comedy "Good weather on Deribasovskaya". For the new heroes of Ukraine a la Talashko, he is also senior lieutenant Skvortsov (only old people go to battle) I don't even want to remember.
        Hence the fair question, was there a boy? Maybe it was not they who were talents, but the system of Soviet cinema and censorship itself was talented, since it knew how to make talents out of them? After all, after the abolition of censorship, practically no worthy film appeared in our cinema. For me, the exception is "Quartet I", really talented guys who make quite a good movie. But that's probably all. Do not look at Dzhigarkhanyan in "The Best Film" or discuss his personal life, how he went crazy at the end of his life. I don't want to remember Raikin and Akhedzhakova either. And so in everything.
        Maybe people were right in the Middle Ages, who did not consider actors as people and buried them separately outside the fence of the cemetery, like lepers? Maybe this is not "ilita", but all the same the ram of the nation?
        1. Svarog
          Svarog April 21 2020 16: 14 New
          32
          The problem is that with the collapse of the USSR and the abolition of censorship, the actors disappeared

          Actor .. he is an actor, for which they pay, he plays, but the director and screenwriter .. they order the music .. and this music sounds for brainwashing of young people .. From fear this music is ordered and encouraged by the "elite" .. because the result can not be achieved in anything, so at least spit on the past .. and in their own way ..
          1. Varyag_0711
            Varyag_0711 April 21 2020 16: 31 New
            37
            So the talent of an actor consists in that, he must play a role in such a way that I believe him, feel imbued and begin to empathize with him. And not that I was sick of one kind of empty eyes of another movie doll. They cannot convey an elementary emotion. That is why you believe in the scene of Stirlitz's meeting with his wife in a restaurant? After all, there is practically nothing other than music and frozen faces. But how do these faces convey emotions? And look at the modern actors. Stanislavsky would not even have entrusted the role of "eating served" to them.
            However, modern directors from the actors of the game apparently do not require. Yes, and why? Type people and so grab. Only now I can’t do this and I don’t want to do this. That’s why I don’t go to cinemas, I don’t want to feed them either.
            1. New Year day
              New Year day April 21 2020 16: 37 New
              18
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              he must play a role so that I believe him, imbued and began to empathize with him

              This is alien to modern films.
              1. muham
                muham April 22 2020 12: 11 New
                0
                Quote: Silvestr
                This is alien to modern films.
                In modern cinema, IMHO, the director and editor are more important. With other things being equal, these are those that can make candy or ... waste.
            2. Svarog
              Svarog April 21 2020 17: 02 New
              21
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              Stanislavsky would not even have entrusted the role of "eating served" to them.

              It's true. It is difficult for them to penetrate into the image when the head and heart are empty. hi
              1. Albert1988
                Albert1988 April 23 2020 17: 19 New
                +3
                Quote: Svarog
                It's true. It is difficult for them to penetrate into the image when the head and heart are empty.

                That is why modern actors do not transform into an image, but pull on themselves only those images that match their character. For example, Fedor Bondarchuk can play only a greedy, impudent and self-confident person with an incredibly high self-conceit and a very low cultural level, which he himself is. The same applies to Khamatova, and to the good 99% of our contemporary and world actors ...
            3. Lyuba1965_01
              Lyuba1965_01 April 21 2020 18: 02 New
              +8
              There is no point in condemning the actors, there is simply no point for them to search for the essence of their hero. Indeed, what a complex image there is in serials, where everything is clear, here is a villain, here is a tragedian, here is a lyrical heroine, and there is a comedian ... Now there are no screen images of heroes, only types. Therefore, the actors also disappeared as creators of complex and conflicting characters. The directors also work according to stereotyped schemes, they drive the "product". They used to make movies, it was a creative process, but now it's just a business. Believe it or not, I don’t watch modern films and serials, so sometimes I watch them in fragments, because it’s boring, boring and not interesting.
              1. Altona
                Altona April 21 2020 18: 26 New
                13
                Quote: Lyuba1965_01
                You won’t believe it, but I don’t watch modern films and TV shows, so I sometimes watch them in fragments, because it’s boring, boring and not interesting.

                ---------------------------
                I don't watch either, I search the Internet for classics of Hollywood and Soviet cinema, not everything is really interesting, I analyze it myself, I see the actors' play and the "social order". The trouble with modern "filmmaking" is the focus on the "picture", instead of the old-fashioned psychologism there are some hysterics and boring conversations about living with the vulgar morality "we are not like that, life is like that." The most interesting thing is that there used to be some notorious "modest charm of the bourgeoisie." Today you watch an American film and think, "Well, how can a messenger and a princess cross. And even if they do, how will she fall in love with him? She has a whole estate of these messengers." And in that spirit. As for the consultants, it's a separate song altogether, the main thing is to correctly reproduce bottle boots, breeches with braids and a cap with a blue crown. All! Historicity is ready-eat! As for the plots, then there is generally horror-horror, or rather a stupid attempt to vulgarize everything and everyone. You can write for a long time, but you yourself see everything from screens and monitors into what cinema has become.
                1. Lyuba1965_01
                  Lyuba1965_01 April 21 2020 18: 30 New
                  11
                  It didn't turn into anything, it just disappeared. No films, only "product".
                  1. Tatyana Pershina
                    Tatyana Pershina April 23 2020 12: 09 New
                    +1
                    "No movies, just 'product'."
                    The product of elite creative digestion.
                2. NordUral
                  NordUral April 21 2020 20: 37 New
                  +5
                  I don’t look either, I look on the net for the classics of Hollywood and Soviet cinema
                  Exactly, sometimes I delve into a pile of Hollywood shit for up to an hour until I find a decent movie.
                  Therefore, I do not look often, and especially nothing but Soviet ones.
            4. tracer
              tracer April 22 2020 04: 11 New
              +3
              Bravo Varangian! BRAVO! DO NOT SAY BETTER.
            5. Nick
              Nick April 30 2020 22: 33 New
              0
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              However, modern directors from the actors of the game apparently do not require. Yes, and why? Type people and so grab.

              Do you keep these Anashkin, Fomin and others seriously for the directors or what? Mediocrity, creatively and intellectually poor. Already seven eight years ago, archival documents were declassified, which made it clear that mass repressions were unleashed by regional barons, such as Eikhe and Khrushchev, who tried to justify their need by exacerbating the class struggle, but in fact tried to retain and preserve their power, removing all potential competitors, with the support of then People's Commissar of the NKVD Yezhov. Stalin managed to stop them only in 1939, with the help of L.P. Beria whom he managed to lead to the post of deputy to Yezhov in the NKVD apparatus. But these squalors, trying to make historical films on the theme of the 30s - 40s, do not even try to read the historical documents of that era or invite normal consultants, and continue to talk about the "Stalinist repressions" that the scoundrel Khrushchev invented, who renamed Yezhov's repressions into Stalinist ones.
          2. leshiy076
            leshiy076 April 21 2020 18: 52 New
            18
            Quote: Svarog
            Actor .. he is an actor, for which they pay, he plays, but the director and screenwriter .. they order the music .. and this music sounds for brainwashing of young people .. From fear this music is ordered and encouraged by the "elite" .. because the result can not be achieved in anything, so at least spit on the past .. and in their own way ..

            Directors and screenwriters don't order the tune. They only execute orders for such music. Music is ordered by those who pay money to directors and screenwriters. Then someone said that the censorship was canceled. In my opinion, this is not entirely true, they changed the censors rather than the censorship. The ideology has changed and there is no need to think that if ideological pluralism was written in the constitution, then we have it. On the fence they will not write anything. In fact, the ideology of the "Golden Calf" is being imposed on us now. All are measured in monetary terms from a position profitable or not. Look at most of the soap series characters, all following the same pattern: he is a successful businessman, he has a bitch wife, and she is a simpleton. And in the 125th episode, the simpleton was lucky to take the place of the bitch. Such serials are filmed as if on an assembly line. Such a film cannot have commercial success in principle, but what does it mean then, why are they filming this nonsense from year to year, because it costs money anyway. The answer is simple. You just need to sit people down at the TVs so that they hawala this nonsense, and at the same time advertising. Whatever they think about anything outsider, such as the meaning of life, personal development, the development of culture, intelligence. This means there are those who deliberately invest in fooling the population. This means that such people have a definite goal to achieve which they are ready to spend a lot of money. Who are these people? Well, let everyone look for the answer to this question, at least for himself.
        2. Mikhail3
          Mikhail3 April 21 2020 17: 37 New
          -13
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          This begs the fair question, was there a boy? Maybe it was not they who were talents, but the very system of Soviet cinema and censorship was talented, since they knew how to make talents of them?

          Well yes. And so it was. Moreover, as others here write, the role of the actor in the film is small. He just has to portray what he was told. The maximum that an actor can in a film is to come up with some sort of chips along the main line. But he can’t touch anything substantial, because to determine something the real actor does not simply have the right. This is not his level, and not his work. Do not like the script thoroughly? You just have to refuse to work in it.
          Khamatova supports a large charity project to work with sick children. And she will shoot, say anything that will allow to receive money for this project. Here you are not the USSR ... She is a good actress and beauty, so the author wasted nothing to curse in her direction. But she can play only what she is allowed to.
          The question is different. Why is the state clearly interested in such films and TV shows? How did this happen? What leads to?
        3. pmkemcity
          pmkemcity April 22 2020 09: 37 New
          0
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          After all, after the abolition of censorship in our cinema, almost no decent films appeared

          Yes, there is everything - both Balabanov, and Sakurov, and the same Litvinova ...
        4. james
          james April 23 2020 09: 54 New
          0
          One word of a lyceum is the One who, pretending to be, pretending to be trying not to seem like that and not like who and what is in reality; pretender.
      2. New Year day
        New Year day April 21 2020 16: 37 New
        15
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Can they be compared with people who themselves went through the hell of war?

        and where to find them, those contemporaries? Without knowing it, they shoveled the history, changed the concept and the USE turned out to be the exit. Don't think - tick the boxes
      3. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny April 21 2020 16: 44 New
        15
        Aron, well, one could add Nikulin, Basov, Papanov, Smirnov. And then, somehow with a slight nationalist bias your comment.
        1. Varyag_0711
          Varyag_0711 April 21 2020 17: 04 New
          +1
          Roundabout (Alexey)
          Aron, well, one could add Nikulin, Basov, Papanov, Smirnov. And then, somehow with a slight nationalist bias your comment.
          And what did you expect from a representative of a God-chosen nation?
        2. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi April 21 2020 18: 07 New
          14
          Quote: Okolotochny
          Aron, well, one could add Nikulin, Basov, Papanov, Smirnov. And then, somehow with a slight nationalist bias your comment.

          Yes, any number.
      4. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine April 21 2020 20: 27 New
        +4
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        The problem is that the authors and actors creating such films are that they themselves were never forced to overcome real difficulties in life. Can they be compared with people who themselves went through the hell of war?
        April 21, the world celebrates Holocaust Remembrance Day - The Holocaust and Heroism of European Jewry during the Second World War. 76 years ago (according to the Jewish calendar), an uprising broke out in the Warsaw ghetto that day. Eternal memory to all the dead.
      5. sabakina
        sabakina April 21 2020 20: 38 New
        +9
        Aron, you’re probably already sleeping, but I can’t help but put this video. There was a time, there were actors and directors ...
        1. sabakina
          sabakina April 21 2020 20: 41 New
          +2
          Oops, I’m duplicating .... But alright, steam does not break bones.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine April 21 2020 15: 51 New
      22
      Quote: Vadim237
      Yes, there, by shooting in an advertisement, it was clear that even the operator worked on XXXXXX.
      When mediocre people create a mediocre film, then it will be mediocre on the screens. How much I do not advertise manure, it will remain manure, for a garden it is good, but you can’t spread it on bread.
    3. Vend
      Vend April 21 2020 16: 16 New
      16
      I watched the trailer for the film and realized that there was nothing to watch. And the name, in general "Viy" by Gogol reminded me, but the name turned out not to be in the eyebrow, but in the eye))
      1. Rjkley
        Rjkley April 21 2020 19: 08 New
        +4
        "Raise my eyelids ..." (C)
        I remember from childhood!
    4. Alex Nevs
      Alex Nevs April 21 2020 19: 20 New
      +5
      With such polished fat faces, "faces" with triple chins, with concrete fat on the face and neck. Yes, in such conditions (as they wanted to show). Like a comedy.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather April 21 2020 19: 37 New
        11
        the film, very aptly named in the "Network": "Zuleikha, spreads her legs."
        1. Servisinzhener
          Servisinzhener April 22 2020 21: 19 New
          0
          Sorry for the main villain does not play Ron Jeremy laughing
  2. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 21 2020 15: 10 New
    11
    there is no censorship in the country ... is it good or bad? ... there is no definite answer either .... but the result is obvious ...
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine April 21 2020 15: 47 New
      34
      Quote: Pvi1206
      there is no censorship in the country ... is it good or bad?

      It may be good when a shoemaker sharpens his boots, a stool seller sells them, a journalist writes articles. But when lawyers stage films, stoolists build airplanes, and journalists launch ships into space, then this is already "beyond the bounds". And in our capitalist society this is a common occurrence. All mediocrities and ignoramuses are running around the scenes (the main thing is "I'm not a sucker") and receive the title of "People's Artist", the directors do not shoot this that you no longer understand what century they want to show, and she is anti-Soviet (queue for sausage). And besides the podium and stage? Inflated order bearers, "women" in the form of commanders of fronts, armies and corps (according to the gradation of the Second World War), and only order bars, like Zhukov's. Devalued titles, state awards, great personalities. Instead, pop music and a courtyard shantrop came. Now the country is going through a crisis, it is hard for the whole people, but the "star unit" (jesters and clowns) do not care, they dance and sing, arrange jubilees of mediocrities. And it was especially jarring when on TV, after heavy messages about "Karonai-19", they immediately let the grandmother's birthday concert on. Where have we come to?
      1. andrew42
        andrew42 April 21 2020 16: 52 New
        13
        All these "figures", sucking the budget in a chain, can be designated by one very capacious word of the generation of my grandfathers, namely: NOT work. With emphasis on the first syllable.
      2. Rjkley
        Rjkley April 21 2020 19: 19 New
        +4
        Vlad! Entirely and completely in solidarity !!! Particularly shocking and even enraging are the DUty (read: the mummers) * Heroes *, Order-bearers and General Marshals in skirts, but how they can puff out their cheeks ... (((
        Eh ....
    2. New Year day
      New Year day April 21 2020 16: 38 New
      +9
      Quote: Pvi1206
      there is no censorship in the country now.

      Is this the case?
      The fact is that people simply do not know the history of their country
      1. Vend
        Vend April 21 2020 19: 24 New
        +6
        Quote: Silvestr
        Quote: Pvi1206
        there is no censorship in the country now.

        Is this the case?
        The fact is that people simply do not know the history of their country

        Even when they know, there's little use. Remember "Viking". That's a shame.
  3. rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 April 21 2020 15: 10 New
    13
    The series, of course, turned out to be so-so, shitty, both from the point of view of art and from the point of view of propaganda, but the way the channel’s chain dogs attacked the critics of this series leads to unpleasant thoughts
    1. Leshy1975
      Leshy1975 April 21 2020 15: 51 New
      23
      Quote: rotkiv04
      The series, of course, turned out to be so-so, shitty, both from the point of view of art and from the point of view of propaganda, but the way the channel’s chain dogs attacked the critics of this series leads to unpleasant thoughts

      Why is it here to induce? When it became clear and understandable for a long time - Decommunization (Desovetization), as in Ukraine, Estonia, etc. only more careful and unhurried.

      PS Well, the fact that this is all the work of the United States and Israel, and the Great nullified and Co., has nothing to do with it, this is a no brainer. Now, gentlemen of Utreota on this subject will explain the report that he is with all his soul FOR THE USSR, but the fifth column and unknown liberals, with this film, again against him, against his all-conquering, iron will, they quietly pulled up his pants. But he will soon find out everything and figure it out, you just have to wait.
      We are waiting for when, following the example of the same Estonia, the opponents and traitors of the USSR will be extolled openly. Although, what am I talking about? And the attempt to install the Mannergem honoring board in Leningrad ?!
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent April 21 2020 18: 02 New
        27
        Picture from Colonel Cassad :

  4. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee April 21 2020 15: 17 New
    30
    Got what I deserve!
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather April 22 2020 02: 51 New
      +3
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Got what I deserve!

      hope this shit flies?
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee April 22 2020 03: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Grandfather is caste
        is it ....... flying?

        It’s the most ... flies ....
  5. Horst78
    Horst78 April 21 2020 15: 19 New
    +9
    And even in spite of aggressive advertising and "scandals" I still have 5 minutes. did not look. I do not even flip through the channel, I just press the desired one laughing
    1. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins April 21 2020 16: 29 New
      -8
      My hands (eyes) also don't reach, the end of the month - there is enough work ... But after the next "revealing" article I start to think - can I look from fifth to ten? They scold too much ...
      1. Fan-fan
        Fan-fan April 21 2020 17: 38 New
        18
        So today I succumbed to anti-advertising and I wanted to make sure myself, looked at almost everything, in fragments, ate myself. And the conclusion is this: people, do not waste your time on this bullshit, neither the plot of the normal nor the normal game of actors, a completely empty film.
        Only one question haunts me more and more - how long will such muck be removed in our country? And I almost have the answer, probably until the power is changed to a completely different one.
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather April 22 2020 02: 53 New
          +5
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          And the conclusion is this: people, do not waste your time on this bullshit, neither the plot of the normal nor the normal game of actors, a completely empty film.

          and on the First Anal, they broadcast that this is a "bestseller" !!!
  6. 7,62h54
    7,62h54 April 21 2020 15: 31 New
    35
    If you dragged this shit to the central channel, and even on the eve of the May holidays this is an indicator of the work of the Ministry of Culture. I want to ask: who are you working for citizen Lyubimova?
    1. Private89
      Private89 April 21 2020 16: 20 New
      +9
      all according to Mikhalkov: contrary!
  7. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I April 21 2020 15: 32 New
    36
    I do not watch this "series" and immediately said that I would not watch! Everything is "concocted" in the same "style" as "Penal Battalion" and other "anti-Soviet" films in the "spirit" of Solzhenitsyn's literary libels! Solzhenitsyn's "literary" lies have been repeatedly exposed, but he still remains the idol of liberals of all stripes! Putin and many "higher ranks" in the government and the State Duma have declared themselves adherents to the creativity of the "Gulag" balabol! The "bohemian anti-ligency" and filmmakers are not lagging behind them! Worse another! The "pro-government" TV channels are raving about the "huge success" of the series! Perhaps this is true! What can indicate that adequate people are becoming less and less, and inadequate, more and more! And this is not the only example ... it is enough to read Yandex Zen to be convinced of this!
    1. Egoza
      Egoza April 21 2020 16: 40 New
      19
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Solzhenitsyn's "literary" lies have been repeatedly exposed, but he still remains the idol of liberals of all stripes!

      But the worst thing is that this "creativity" is actively studied in schools.
      1. Svarog
        Svarog April 21 2020 17: 06 New
        +9
        Quote: Egoza
        But the worst thing is that this "creativity" is actively studied in schools.

        This creativity is aimed at. The adult generation understands and sees this .. and young people are tuned and misled.
        1. bk316
          bk316 April 21 2020 17: 38 New
          18
          and young people are cheated and misled.

          C'mon youth it on the drum as it went in and out.
          And the school can only accelerate this process.

          For the fact that young people in their heads will remain responsible for life.

          One thing makes me angry that the money for this crap is budgetary - that is, it turns out that I am financing these ....
  8. Leshy1975
    Leshy1975 April 21 2020 15: 33 New
    38
    Contemporary Russian cinema, era - the Russian Federation rose from its knees, I can not stand the spirit. In most cases, mediocrity (with a capital letter), stupidity (where only stories are found) and often a lie. Although even in the 90s, by inertia, they could still shoot a real movie.
    The same cult Brother.
    Yes, it is with a touch of depression prevailing at that time in the country, but that was exactly Kino.
    And the fact that they are riveting now is complete impotence and degeneration, of directors and actors. Which is not surprising - what times, such a cinema.

    PS The time of the victorious insanity and the feeling of a complete lack of prospects, both for the country as a whole, and for the individual. Here is the cinematography and corresponds to this time, completely. And not any "Spring on the street across the river" or "Battalions are asking for fire", and even "Assy" or "Needles", will not be removed. Troubadours and jesters meet the requirements of the royal court, and more is not required.
    1. Taga
      Taga April 21 2020 15: 51 New
      10
      They can’t take it off, but they can’t take it back, how healthy!
      1. Leshy1975
        Leshy1975 April 21 2020 15: 56 New
        11
        Quote: Taga
        They can’t take it off, but they can’t take it back, how healthy!

        It's right. In most cases, their ideas are enough for remakes. But in comparison with the original, it would be better if they didn’t even try to shoot. hi
        1. Taga
          Taga April 21 2020 16: 11 New
          +8
          Often, secondary crafts present the original in an even more winning light.
    2. BIABIA
      BIABIA April 21 2020 15: 57 New
      +7
      There was also something worthwhile in the 44s. "We are from the future", "In August XNUMXth". But these are exceptions ...
      1. Leshy1975
        Leshy1975 April 21 2020 16: 10 New
        12
        It's a matter of personal taste, of course. "In August 44th", I agree, I like it, although stamps are also visible.
        But "We are from the future", already a full set of cliches, where is the special man without a beast, whom "do not feed with bread", but let someone innocent "expose" and fight is understandable only interferes and the atmosphere in the detachment is specially forcing.
        Well, against the backdrop of a love story, such an a la vaudeville looms, because the game of the main characters (and not the main ones and even worse) is not able to convince that this is all serious. One rap (or something like that, I have already forgotten) in the film is worth it. hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Okolotochny
            Okolotochny April 21 2020 16: 48 New
            +6
            "In August 44th"

            Disgustingly filmed, very much. Especially the hero of Captain Alekhine. Have you read the book? If Galkin in the role of Tamantsev is the very thing, then how could an actor be approved for the role of counterintelligence captain with .... non-traditional? He also played the role, glamorous, "sweet".
            1. Varyag_0711
              Varyag_0711 April 21 2020 17: 02 New
              +8
              Roundabout (Alexey)
              Disgustingly filmed, very much. Especially the hero of Captain Alekhine. Have you read the book? If Galkin in the role of Tamantsev is the very thing, then how could an actor be approved for the role of counterintelligence captain with .... non-traditional? He also played the role, glamorous, "sweet".
              About Mironov in the role of Alekhine, in general, I agree, Mironov is still a matter of fact, with Chulpan Khamatova one field of berries. But in general, the film was not made badly, the book is certainly far away, but where did you see the film comparable to the book? I don’t remember such people even in the USSR, not to mention modern cinema.
              1. AU Ivanov.
                AU Ivanov. April 21 2020 17: 15 New
                10
                A Soviet film comparable to a book? "The meeting place cannot be changed" Practically according to the text, with rare exceptions.
                1. cost
                  cost April 22 2020 08: 49 New
                  +2
                  A Soviet film comparable to a book? "Meeting place can not be Changed"

                  Is there such a book? All the same, the text of "Era of Mercy" differs from the film, where there are many director's inserts
              2. Mordvin 3
                Mordvin 3 April 22 2020 00: 15 New
                +3
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                but where did you see a movie comparable to a book? I don’t even remember such people in the USSR,

                17 moments of spring are even better in my opinion.
              3. victor50
                victor50 April 22 2020 05: 44 New
                +1
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                But in general, the film was not made badly, the book is certainly far away, but where did you see the film comparable to the book? I don’t remember such people even in the USSR, not to mention modern cinema.

                Not often, but it happens. Hot snow, battalions ask for fire. There are others, you don’t remember right away.
              4. cost
                cost April 22 2020 08: 40 New
                +5
                but where did you see a movie comparable to a book? I don’t remember such people even in the USSR

                in the USSR - Ivolga, Zvezda, Train of Mercy, Days of the Turbins, Wild Dingo Dog, Dubravka, Twenty Days Without War, Quiet Don, French Lessons, Aboriginal, Seryozha , "Sergeant Major", "Scarecrow", "Granny", "These Strange Adults", "Seraphim and Seraphima", "Eccentric from 5b", "Eternal Call", "And the Dawns Here Are Quiet"
                Unfortunately, only one thing comes to mind from modern Russian cinema - "Heart of a Dog"
                1. Greenwood
                  Greenwood April 22 2020 16: 27 New
                  +5
                  Dog Heart 1988 Also the USSR.
                  1. cost
                    cost April 22 2020 16: 31 New
                    +2
                    Thanks for the clarification.
                    Then it turns out that modern Russian cinema has nothing to boast about in this regard
              5. Okolotochny
                Okolotochny April 22 2020 12: 03 New
                -1
                So this film did not have to be shot differently. The whole ... "color and tsimus" of the book is not conveyed, all the heat, that LOT of work and nerves of people, from the Supreme to the driver Hizhnyak, stressful load on Alekhine during an ambush, when he must simultaneously pose as a near-minded person, pump over the tested by orientations, control the behavior of the tested, look for inconsistencies in their answers and look for inconsistencies in documents. If this could not be conveyed, then there was nothing to take. And so they made a simple ordinary consumer goods.
              6. Zefr
                Zefr April 23 2020 04: 50 New
                0
                But in general, the film was not made badly, of course, it’s far from the book,

                In the book, Suede men have soldered white bread, don’t go to their clothes, and the soldiers envy them sullenly. After a sortie into the fields, they sleep somewhere for a while with the readiness to immediately undermine on command. The headquarters, who fastidiously put a newspaper on the box ...
                I read it a long time ago. Probably something else.
                Then he watched a movie. Everyone likes the movie. And I did not understand him at all. Clean forest. Fresh form. Sleepy muzzle. Glamorous cams on factory ribbons. A forest the size of a city park - just got off the car, went along the path - and here are the saboteurs - where should they go? Moody saboteurs who have 3 classes written on their faces in corridors. These are the ones that need to be sent undercover. After all, they do not fail the case, which is controlled almost from the highest rate.
                Why people praise this film, I don’t understand.
              7. Pushkar
                Pushkar April 23 2020 10: 20 New
                0
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                But in general, the film was not badly shot,

                The film "In August 44" was filmed in Belarus, at their studio.
            2. AU Ivanov.
              AU Ivanov. April 21 2020 17: 18 New
              +8
              Filmed really not very. Turned a serious psychological military detective into an action movie. And according to the book, not bang-bang, but the intellectual work of Smersh employees.
              1. Uruguay
                Uruguay April 21 2020 17: 22 New
                +1
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                Filmed really not very. Turned a serious psychological military detective into an action movie.

                With scenes of sex and violence, everything is based on Hollywood and Soros training manuals .. On the contrary, of course, especially before May 9, such nasty things constantly appear on the screens ..
                1. AU Ivanov.
                  AU Ivanov. April 21 2020 17: 27 New
                  +7
                  I, in fact, about "In August 44th", when from an excellent book Bogomolov built a mediocre action movie.
                  1. Fan-fan
                    Fan-fan April 21 2020 17: 45 New
                    +5
                    I also read the book "In August 44" with rapture, worried along with the heroes, thanks to the author - well done. But I watched the movie and realized that the filmmakers could not convey the entire tense atmosphere of those events.
                    1. Uncle lee
                      Uncle lee April 22 2020 03: 17 New
                      -1
                      Quote: Fan-Fan
                      could not filmmakers

                      "Troubled Veresen Month" - a movie and a book - two big differences!
                  2. Uruguay
                    Uruguay April 21 2020 18: 37 New
                    -3
                    Quote: AU Ivanov.
                    I, in fact, about "In August 44th", when from an excellent book Bogomolov built a mediocre action movie.

                    Sorry, but this filmman is also from the same garbage .. I also like to read and especially respect memoirs of comfrey and just life books without embellishment, etc.
                    As I understand it, with such films of our youth, the brain is being cleared of memory .. That's scary!
                  3. Peter Panfilov
                    Peter Panfilov April 21 2020 19: 13 New
                    +4
                    I heard that Bogomolov did not accept this film, in its final version.
          2. AU Ivanov.
            AU Ivanov. April 21 2020 19: 19 New
            +5
            All the bloopers "We are from the future" can be forgiven for the sake of one episode, when the Skull rips off the swastika tattoo from his shoulder with a stone.
            1. victor50
              victor50 April 22 2020 05: 46 New
              0
              Quote: AS Ivanov.
              All the bloopers "We are from the future" can be forgiven for the sake of one episode, when the Skull rips off the swastika tattoo from his shoulder with a stone.

              For the sake of the younger generation, yes.
          3. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 April 22 2020 00: 13 New
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Suvorov
            "In August 44th"

            Technically, everything is true, but the spirit of the work of Bogomolov does not smell there.
    3. EVDmitri
      EVDmitri April 21 2020 17: 11 New
      +2
      I agree. But in this context, I would write "lack of gift" and "stupidity". The monsters are obla, observable, but unworthy of a capital letter.
    4. sabakina
      sabakina April 21 2020 20: 53 New
      +9
      Leshy1975, when I watched the Soviet "The Dawns Here Are Quiet", I could not watch without tears. Well, I really felt sorry for those girls. About "White Bim, black ear" Generally urine.
      1. Leshy1975
        Leshy1975 April 21 2020 21: 14 New
        +9
        Quote: sabakina
        Leshy1975, when I watched the Soviet "The Dawns Here Are Quiet", I could not watch without tears. Well, I really felt sorry for those girls. About "White Bim, black ear" Generally urine.

        I, White Bim, a black ear, watched only once, in distant childhood. But more than once I could not watch, even when I was already an adult, I did not review it, I was so sorry for the dog for so much. Good films give rise to strong human (in a good way) emotions. This is true. hi
    5. Okolotochny
      Okolotochny April 22 2020 11: 55 New
      +1
      Here is the cinematography and corresponds to this time, completely ..... "Assy" or "Needles"

      I.e? It turns out that there was crime in the USSR, underground millionaires-guilds, drug addicts and drug mafia ??? Eh .. And the films "Tsar", "Island" is not that? By the way, shouting to the rotten west, what's wrong with Schindler's List? Goblin, enough of the slogan.
  9. Van 16
    Van 16 April 21 2020 15: 36 New
    20
    Recently there was an article on this topic. My opinion has not changed at all. The book (I didn’t watch a movie) is a template anti-Soviet agitation, a spit in the history of our country.
  10. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 April 21 2020 15: 37 New
    22
    Judging by the shit filmed by Russian cinema, one can judge the intellect and worldview of these people, the limited are filmed for the limited, for people with a higher intellect and worldview this is of course pure shit.
    1. Uruguay
      Uruguay April 21 2020 18: 41 New
      +4
      Quote: Pessimist22
      Judging by the shit filmed by Russian cinema, one can judge the intellect and worldview of these people, the limited are filmed for the limited, for people with a higher intellect and worldview this is of course pure shit.

      The Mafia Mikhalkovs rules the ball there, those are still opportunists under any authority and always with money and fame .. negative
  11. illi
    illi April 21 2020 15: 41 New
    -17
    An interesting country, after all. And the time is interesting. With my life, this is the third turn in ideology.
    If this series had been released 15-35 years ago, everyone would have applauded. Perhaps even the author of the article. The actors would have played brilliantly, showing all the "abomination" of the Stalinist regime, etc. And now the series is bad and the actors are murzilki.
    But in one thing, the author is right, our elite and our elite are extremely far from the people. Now, with a bang, the series will come in where the heroic Stalinist security organs expose the bourgeois disadvantages, corrupt traitors to the motherland, etc.
    1. Private89
      Private89 April 21 2020 16: 10 New
      17
      It is better to watch the serial episode "Eternal Call", here’s a movie like that. And about civilian and how industrialization, collectivization took place and about the Great Patriotic War.
      1. Lyuba1965_01
        Lyuba1965_01 April 21 2020 18: 07 New
        +8
        There is also a good TV series "Born by the Revolution".
      2. Leshy1975
        Leshy1975 April 21 2020 19: 38 New
        +5
        Quote: Private 89
        It is better to watch the serial episode "Eternal Call", here’s a movie like that. And about civilian and how industrialization, collectivization took place and about the Great Patriotic War.

        Still Quiet Don 1957, for my taste, one of the best films. That's where you experience the tragedy of the country along with the heroes of the novel. I’ve already seen it many times, but all one, every time my emotions go wild.

        I like the series Experts are leading the investigation. Somehow everything is humane, kind and at the same time about a crime detective. hi
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 April 21 2020 23: 26 New
          +2
          I was always surprised by the scene with the character of Gluzsky in the Quiet Don. How could censorship miss. After all, the enemy of the Bolsheviks evokes sympathy.
          1. Leshy1975
            Leshy1975 April 22 2020 00: 18 New
            +7
            Quote: Sergej1972
            I was always surprised by the scene with the character of Gluzsky in the Quiet Don. How could censorship miss. After all, the enemy of the Bolsheviks evokes sympathy.

            Yes, he is the whole movie is almost so ambiguous. After all, who is Grigory Melikhov himself, the figure is clearly ambiguous, and for the Soviet government you can’t tell whether the enemy is more or not the enemy as a result. But in fact, for almost everyone, the fate of Gregory causes sympathy, and he is uniquely cute. Few people are able to perceive him as an enemy.
            Therefore, this novel (and the film, too) evokes so many emotions that everything is really described in a real, vital way. And you won’t tell right away who the truth is. Yes, and everyone can have their own truth.
            Probably, the tragedy of the country could not be shown otherwise. And varnishing and licking, only downplaying this tragedy.
            Thank you for this film and Sholokhov (as the author of the novel) and the actors, brilliantly played, as if you were there yourself, in the thick of events, such experiences awaken. And to the censors too, since we saw just such a Quiet Don.
            In an ingenious work, everything and everything in its place is a pain of the people, without caricature. hi
    2. Barmaleyka
      Barmaleyka April 21 2020 16: 19 New
      +2
      Quote: illi
      Now the series where the heroic Stalinist security organs expose the bourgeois disadvantages

      and why this cry ?!
    3. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. April 21 2020 16: 47 New
      +9
      Quote: illi
      But in one thing, the author is right, our elite and our elite are extremely far from the people. Now, with a bang, the series will come in where the heroic Stalinist security organs expose the bourgeois disadvantages, corrupt traitors to the motherland, etc.

      Oddly enough, you're right.
      It is this result that was obtained as a result of the cooling of the Soviet Union.
      For a long time to deceive a large number of people will not work.
      A short period of patience with lies has already ended.
  12. korriphila
    korriphila April 21 2020 15: 44 New
    10
    ))) Neighing over the last photo, where the NKVDshniki. If only the papers were crushed with mint into a revolving holster, otherwise it is skinny, because it’s empty ...))))
  13. thinker
    thinker April 21 2020 15: 48 New
    21
    Today I read a generally stunning fact. This is what idiots came up with the scene of roll call at the train before sending!
    In the movie, it sounds like this:
    - Tajuddin Talgat! - I AM! (for those who are not in the know, Talgat Tajuddin is the Supreme Mufti of the Russian Federation)
    - Gainutdin Ravil! - I AM! (Ravil Gainutdin - chairman of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of the Russian Federation).
    - Marjani Shigabutdin! - I AM! (Shigabutdin Marjani - the largest Tatar theologian of the 19th century, mukhtasib of Kazan, imam of the first Kazan mosque)
    - Idrisov Umar! - I AM! (Umar Idrisov - the first chairman of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of the Nizhny Novgorod region)
    - Ponchaev Zhafyar! - I AM! (Zhafar Ponchaev - former chairman of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of St. Petersburg)
    - Gabdrakhimov to the Gabdessaly! - I AM! (Gabdessalyam Gabdrakhimov - prominent Orenburg mufti of the 19th century)
    - Sultanov Muhamedyar! - I AM! (Muhamedyar Sultanov is also a prominent Orenburg mufti of the 19th century)
    The Russian muftiate, who had become an involuntary ally of the Communists, could not endure such a vilification. Mufti member Albir Krganov, a member of the Public Chamber, sent outraged letters to the Government and Dobrodeev, asking for an explanation. ”
    The frightened producer babbled that "the props artists (!!!!!) were just looking for popular Tatar names to create this scene."
    https://www.facebook.com/tatiana.pertseva.1/posts/2906074946127508
    1. Aviator_
      Aviator_ April 21 2020 16: 07 New
      11
      I remember that in 2015, some liberal lady buried the Gazovik football team from Orenburg in the same way, printing their names under the guise of our soldiers who died in Syria.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA April 21 2020 17: 06 New
        11
        Quote: Aviator_
        I remember that in 2015, some liberal lady buried the Gazovik football team from Orenburg in the same way, printing their names under the guise of our soldiers who died in Syria.

        Well, how can you forget Madame Vasilyeva?

        She also buried applicants from the Buryat Pedagogical College and the heroes of Bushkov’s novels. smile
    2. Taga
      Taga April 21 2020 16: 35 New
      +3
      They can’t even douse them with mud, so that without complaints (if this is true)!
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 21 2020 17: 10 New
      +9
      Quote: thinker
      Today I read a generally stunning fact. This is what idiots came up with the scene of roll call at the train before sending!

      Only Ramzan is missing from this list. To be sure, with a guarantee. smile
      1. Peter Panfilov
        Peter Panfilov April 21 2020 19: 17 New
        +4
        This is impossible, he will take evil and he will light it!
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA April 21 2020 19: 24 New
          +5
          Quote: Peter Panfilov
          This is impossible, he will take evil and he will light it!

          So I say - so that with a guarantee! smile
          Maybe even so it will be possible to improve Russian cinema.
  14. Oleg Skvortsov
    Oleg Skvortsov April 21 2020 15: 54 New
    11
    What do you want from these liberal pigs, champing from one Kremlin feeding trough? What is pop - such is the parish.
  15. knn54
    knn54 April 21 2020 15: 55 New
    10
    - But suddenly Anashkin felt an urgent need for creativity, so in 2005 he graduated from the directing department of VGIK.
    I think that he is no lawyer either, because talent is multifaceted.
  16. Private89
    Private89 April 21 2020 16: 05 New
    15
    And what exactly did you expect, money is given only for such anti-Soviet, and who gives it? Yes, those who seized power in the 91st and actually did not go anywhere for all 30 years. Everything Soviet is mortally dangerous for them, just as a just punishment is deadly dangerous for a criminal, they’re defaming, but like with Stalin, how much garbage you don’t do, and the wind of history will mercilessly dispel it.
  17. Egoza
    Egoza April 21 2020 16: 38 New
    +8
    https://sntat.ru/news/culture/03-11-2018/pochemu-nekotorye-tatarskie-artisty-otkazalis-snimatsya-v-seriale-zuleyha-otkryvaet-glaza-5643258
    Read how many good actors refused to star in this series and why. There is nothing to add!
  18. parusnik
    parusnik April 21 2020 16: 41 New
    11
    An amazing situation has developed in our capitalist country. Cinema figures who "suffered" in the bloody USSR
    .... Yeah ... choked them, choked, strangled laughing ..I wrote a long time ago that our movie is being shot according to Hollywood patterns .. Bad, good, love line, a lingering kiss in the finale against the background of a nuclear explosion. We have a slightly different specifics, entirely a positive hero fights with enemies, he is hindered by "his" enemies , he wins everyone, a love line, a lingering kiss, or with minor changes like in this film .. Yes, and always seasoned with anti-Sovietism ..
    1. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener April 22 2020 21: 13 New
      0
      I have long written that our films are filmed according to Hollywood patterns ..
      Since we imagine them. laughing
  19. SuperEnot
    SuperEnot April 21 2020 16: 47 New
    10
    The author does not know the main secret: In Russian, as well as Ukrainian, cinema, money is earned in the process of shooting and not according to the rental results. Interestingly, what is there with the scandal over the roll call of the Tatars? There must be a wild scandal, because this is clearly an insult to the feelings of believers.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 21 2020 17: 16 New
      12
      Quote: Super Raccoon
      In Russian, as well as Ukrainian, cinema, money is earned during the shooting process and not according to the rental results

      Why are these euphemisms - "earned"? There is a good and succinct word - development allocated budget. smile
      And this budget is the main source of income for the film crew and people involved. And what will happen to the rental ... but who needs it.
      They wrote out the ninety-third gasoline for the diesel engine and left.
      © M. Zhvanetsky
  20. veritas
    veritas April 21 2020 16: 53 New
    15
    In this system, filmmakers who stuck to the state financial flows did not receive an assessment of their work according to the opinions of the audience, not by the decision of the “bloody review commission”, not by the box office in cinemas, but by the number of figures on TV and the quality of the connections between this shop intercommunication

    As long as the state will encourage this disgrace, and even allocate money for it, so it will be. Degradation is everywhere ..
  21. Asad
    Asad April 21 2020 16: 59 New
    +4
    TV repair or what? Six months worth unnecessarily! And then there are such passions!
  22. shubin
    shubin April 21 2020 17: 01 New
    -1
    After such a PR, only the blind will not look at him. The second article for today is only in VO, I'm not talking for the entire Internet.
    1. Egoza
      Egoza April 21 2020 17: 24 New
      +8
      Quote: shubin
      After such a PR, only the blind will not look at him.

      Oh, No! It’s enough to watch 5 times a day’s advertisement of this film and immediately start to watch it!
      1. Uruguay
        Uruguay April 21 2020 17: 30 New
        -3
        Quote: Egoza
        Oh, No! It’s enough to watch 5 times a day’s advertisement of this film and immediately start to watch it!

        And I noticed that the more advertising of a movie in all the media "ours" means the film is clearly bullshit or even worse with poison dripping into the souls of especially our children .. hi I liked the book, but there the female soul in the first place was her feelings and love .. And the film is a politician and inciting everything dark ....
  23. EVDmitri
    EVDmitri April 21 2020 17: 04 New
    +7
    The lava boiling in the vent of the volcano is a faint resemblance to the boiling of passions around a demonstration of the historical - in every sense - cinematic spillover, splashed out on people self-insulated by decision of the authorities on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.

    Manipulation failed! Multilayer provocation. And unobvious - if you do not look closely. So let's take a closer look.

    The creators and distributors of the series brilliantly solved the problem: how to simultaneously outrage the masses that are opposite in political, ideological and confessional orientation and direct their anger at the current government, read - at Putin. For in understanding shirnarmass it is he who is responsible in the country and in the world for everything. Even for what he is not responsible for.

    See for yourself.

    Let's start from the end. The series is heavily advertised, imposed and defended on the main federal channel. What is the logic of people who are outraged by the abomination shown on this channel? That's right: nothing is done on the state channel without direct instructions from above. Who is in the understanding of our people "from above", I think, to explain, is unnecessary.

    The series was shot on the basis of state financing. Budget allocated in the Ministry of Culture. Not a single ministry dares (again, in our places, to the strangeness of a straightforward “logic”!) To finance projects without permission from above. About how we understand "from above" - ​​see above.

    It remains to extrapolate the actions of the authorities and, based on the existing precedents of camouflage the Mausoleum, to predict the course of thought emanating “from above”: the people won the great battle against Nazism in defiance of Soviet power in general and the will of Stalin in particular. By the way, sometimes you think that our handshakes hate the Mausoleum not so much because Lenin rests in it, but because Stalin stood on the rostrum of the Mausoleum ...

    Now the sweetest thing.

    By screening, to the point of caricature, the intensified “atrocities” of Stalinism and the Soviet government in general aroused both those who rejoiced over the death of the USSR and those for whom the collapse of the Union was a historical and personal tragedy. The incitement of a conflict on the basis of the fall of the great country greatly contributes to brainwashing and the subsequent attack on purified gray matter, awakens the idea that the government (read, Putin) is destroying Russia as well.

    That's not all. The clever move was successful for the creators of the series with a mocking mention of the famous Tatar names in the scenes of roll call. The creators and patrons of the movie parasquil, supposedly because of the simplicity of their souls, took the most common Tatar names ... But if you take into account the "logic" mentioned above? On whose account do viewers and those who ignore the show out of squeamishness, but cannot ignore the atmosphere around it, how impossible it is to ignore the air, should, according to the idea of ​​the directors of provocation, take this vile joke?

    With one shot, it was possible to injure, figuratively speaking, a quivering doe of national feelings, and a rude bear in an earflaps with a red Stalinist star ...

    We summarize the foregoing and get an intermediate result: cancellation of the screening of film cascaville is required not only by the "Communists of Russia", but also by Muslim figures. And to the fault of the authorities, it is added that it inspired mockery of Muslim and national cultural figures.

    I fully admit that when the production of this movie parasquille was intended, the goal was determined to be just a delicious spit on the anniversary of the Victory. But then the change of government struck, and what was most undesirable for our “partners” and their archers was the inevitable approach of a vote on amendments to the current constitution, and the effect of the planned action exceeded expectations. Introducing additional doubts into the electorate’s minds about the actions of the authorities (read Putin) is a solid step towards at least turning people away from the idea of ​​going to the polling station, and at the very least suggesting that they vote against the changes proposed by those without direct indication would not have been possible to show the disgusting movie screen.
    1. Pushkar
      Pushkar April 23 2020 10: 46 New
      +1
      Quote: EVDmitri
      to outrage the masses that are opposite in political, ideological, and confessional orientation and direct their anger at the current government, read - at Putin.

      An old tale about a kind father-tsar and evil boyars, who do not allow Father to take care of his beloved subjects ("I smear a sandwich with butter, immediately the thought - what about the people?").
      1. EVDmitri
        EVDmitri April 23 2020 21: 15 New
        -1
        And how does the tale about the good king and evil boyars correlate with the expression "The king is played by courtiers"? Have you ever wondered?
        1. Pushkar
          Pushkar April 24 2020 14: 04 New
          +1
          Quote: EVDmitri
          correlates with the expression "The king is played by the courtiers"

          "The suite is playing the king." Theatrical proverb, but in life - "what is the pop, so is the parish."
          1. EVDmitri
            EVDmitri April 24 2020 18: 30 New
            -1
            Following your logic, the proverb about the king is generally fabulous. But in life it’s not like in the church.
  24. anjey
    anjey April 21 2020 17: 21 New
    +7
    This "masterpiece" was already seen in advertising, the film "Rzhev" disappointed me very much, mediocrity, and even on the eve of the 75th anniversary of Victory ... I don't know why, but for example the German film "Our Mothers and Fathers" is more believable and bearing the image of human tragedy and conveys the breath of that time, albeit from enemy trenches. I do not understand that it does not give our home-grown "geniuses" to learn from their classics directors who showed the war and the tragedy of people on it and not just a set of military special effects and a couple of templates about the bloody NKVD and fools - commanders ...
  25. Amateur
    Amateur April 21 2020 17: 23 New
    11
    Did not watch. Do not read. But! Interesting!
    And who gave the money for the shoot? And who received this money? And why, on Victory Day, feces again? Why are feces for Cosmonautics Day?
    1. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 April 23 2020 11: 05 New
      -1
      Quote: Amateur
      Did not watch. Do not read. But! Interesting!

      And here I looked with my wife. True, I watched the last 2 episodes. And I didn’t die. I even felt compassion for the main characters
  26. for
    for April 21 2020 17: 53 New
    +1
    In 2001, he graduated from Moscow State University of Service with a degree in jurisprudence. But suddenly Anashkin felt an urgent need for creativity

    There is someone to take an example.
  27. Doctor
    Doctor April 21 2020 18: 30 New
    +2
    Promotion went, as with Matilda. Many will lead, begin to watch. And if there weren’t this kipish, no one would have paid attention ...
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. yasvet
    yasvet April 21 2020 18: 35 New
    +5
    The clever move was successful for the creators of the series with a mocking mention of famous Tatar names in the scenes of roll call


    Yes, externally, there is no roll call with names in the text of the novel.
    Collectivization, dispossession is a very difficult topic, the approach should be very delicate, the creators of the series screwed up in full.
    1. anjey
      anjey April 21 2020 19: 02 New
      +9
      My great-grandfather and his big family were dispossessed in the 30s and exiled to Vyatka.
      Grandmother and sister returned to their homeland and became leaders in the local collective farm, maybe there were grievances, but they reconciled with the authorities, they did not hear about some bloody GPU schnicks from them, it was difficult to survive especially in the war, it’s so since the 90s , by political order, many colors thicken at that time ...
  30. Junior Private
    Junior Private April 21 2020 18: 36 New
    13
    Due to self-isolation and stretching of my legs, I have to spend most of my time in a horizontal position. For fun, I looked through the central channels and just went nuts. I want to emphasize right away that for the last 20-25 years, I have not been fond of watching a zombie box. On all television spaces they broadcast the same thing: mediocre actresses stick out their painted eyes, supposedly depicting acting, moderately scary singers with their mouths, apparently with their movements depict eternal love to the sound of plywood, pseudo-political information materials and, of course, viral hysteria - now without it nowhere. And all this against the background of advertising of medicines, which are recommended to seize the advertised food. And they also pulled Wang out of the naphthalene with the Kashpirovskys. All these "zuleikhs" seem to have hammered their heads long ago. I'd like to swear hard. For sure I know one thing - if you get a gag reflex from watching these "zuleikh", then you are healthy.
  31. LeonidL
    LeonidL April 21 2020 19: 08 New
    +5
    I am ashamed of Makovetsky, I think that decent people with minimal knowledge of the history of their country should not be filmed in such a crap. 30 silver coins are not money, as they came and they left, but their conscience and reputation are soiled forever.
    1. anjey
      anjey April 21 2020 19: 29 New
      +4
      What do you want, if already, for example, dear Porechenkov and Garmash, for example, are now being shot in dubious advertisements for the divorce of people for money, the roles and people playing them, sometimes do not correspond to reality ....
    2. Million
      Million April 21 2020 19: 57 New
      +1
      They say that Dzhigarkhanyan had a phrase: for the money though in the ass I will give ...
      And here are 30 pieces of silver for the kosher Makovetsky ....
      And on the other hand: if Makovetsky does not play, then they will find another, some Makarsky, Kozlovsky and other "Gazmanov"
  32. Gardamir
    Gardamir April 21 2020 19: 25 New
    0
    All this is sad. Half of those indignant today, tomorrow they will again denounce the Bolsheviks. And then we live in the time of the best ruler, during the reign of which the best films are made.
    I will not talk about the cross and the underpants. Well, at least a little, let's be consistent.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog April 21 2020 20: 11 New
      +2
      Quote: Gardamir
      All this is sad. Half of those indignant today, tomorrow they will again denounce the Bolsheviks.

      Can a transformation take place and understanding begins in people?
  33. Corundum
    Corundum April 21 2020 19: 50 New
    -3
    The author did not advise which movie SHOULD be watched .... And so on the taste and color.
  34. WapentakeLokki
    WapentakeLokki April 21 2020 20: 21 New
    +5
    ... I look at the Chekist, the same as in the Shtrafbat ... he got old but ... he doesn’t lower the bar ... as Misha Pugovkin used to say in Ivan Vasilyevich ... WHAT TYPE !!! .. that's just I don’t recognize you in make-up ... but there’s something to find out .. it’s passed ... knows how many years (.. I don’t remember the year of the release of this SheDavra - StraufBat..aaaa) it passed .. same ... however, the trend..no ???
  35. camo ridges
    camo ridges April 21 2020 20: 44 New
    +4
    Magnificent analysis not only of absolutely mediocre creation, but also
    the underpinnings of the concoctions are a series of such "masterpieces". After all, just such
    crafts characterize our cinema today, and rare grains
    luck only set off his squalor. Where are you, real creators, ay!
    and silence...
  36. Ural resident
    Ural resident April 21 2020 20: 57 New
    +3
    In addition to ideology, modern films and series that are stamped in a stream on Mosfilm are also devoid of elementary concepts of art. Not directing, or rather directing poor for the thinking of a 5 year old child, there is no acting at all, I don’t know, have we lost any talents? No one is killed for camera work, plus the music on a cheap synthesizer, the same in all films and apparently played at once by one musician. It is evident that when they can’t come up with anything, they try to take entourage, historical costumes, interiors and the same nothing-expressing faces from film to film. In general, it is impossible to watch. In the old days, bad films were lost in one thing, in directing, for example, in a script, but here everything is in two. I don’t understand, it’s difficult to write scenes, the students stamp them in the classroom, you read - there are so many interesting things there, just film, no, dullness wins everything and everywhere.
    1. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV April 22 2020 13: 46 New
      0
      On Mosfilm they are not stamped, for a television series a couple of rooms is enough
      1. Ural resident
        Ural resident April 22 2020 13: 51 New
        +2
        So there are rented areas for filming. Somehow he walked - this is a whole city. And Shakhnazarov admitted - 95% of Mosfilm’s income from the filming of television series.
        1. Andrey VOV
          Andrey VOV April 22 2020 21: 06 New
          0
          Taking pictures ourselves and renting out areas are two different things.
  37. Million
    Million April 21 2020 21: 10 New
    +1
    None of the new anti-Soviet films achieved success, even close to the success of the best Soviet films. Moreover. 99 percent of the modern "White Guard cinema" is utter rubbish.

    But why did it happen?

    It seems that one of the reasons is as follows. Soviet cinema (and literature) about the civil war, security officers, fists, etc. - explained the motivation for the actions of opponents of the Soviet regime. Well, that is, where they came from, the motives and goals of their actions - what these opponents wanted to achieve.

    For example, it was explained that white officers fought against the Reds, because they came from a privileged minority and until 1917 lived like Christ's bosom. The revolution stripped them of their privileges - so they wanted to return what they had lost.

    But the kulaks were against collective farms, because they became rich in the exploitation of poor peasants. Collective farms - deprived them of that joy, hence the antagonism. Well and so on.

    That is, in the Soviet understanding, landowners, fists, White Guards are not hellish monsters, but normal people with their own interests. It’s just that these interests diverged from those of the majority of the population.

    As a result, the war against people who have their own interests alien to us - has a meaning that is understandable to the viewer and looks sympathetically in the movies.

    The contemporary "White Guard cinema" does not give an explanation of the motives for the actions of the Bolsheviks.

    Where did the Bolsheviks come from? Out of nowhere. These are the evil Martians who attacked the good earthlings. Therefore, they take away property from good fists and noble whites, arrange grain stores in temples and do not give delicious champagne to sensitive and noble young ladies.

    They are bad because they are bad.

    Such characters in art are called the “operet villain” - that is, the villain who commits unjustified atrocities for the sake of evil itself.
  38. il-z
    il-z April 21 2020 21: 41 New
    +1
    - A specialist is a barbarian whose ignorance is not comprehensive (Stanilaw Lem).
    In the modern acting / directing / pop scene, the "golden calf" is primary, art is secondary and is a means of achieving the main goal. "Loot drives", and it is useless for them to point out their limitations and "curvature".
  39. was-witek
    was-witek April 21 2020 22: 28 New
    +2
    There is only one question ... How to exclude the appearance of such films on the screen of our TVs ??? The incitement of ethnic hatred will lead to the collapse of the state ...
  40. tatra
    tatra April 21 2020 22: 59 New
    -4
    It is very interesting that on the Web this series is praised and defended mainly by Russian descendants of the kulaks and the so-called liberals of a certain nationality, but there are no paid government propagandists among them. This suggests that Putin decided to distance himself from this series.
  41. Brigadier
    Brigadier April 21 2020 23: 33 New
    +2
    Looked at this gov .., hmm, "creation" and realized that whatever you call it, it still stinks!
  42. Sotskiy
    Sotskiy April 21 2020 23: 39 New
    0
    To the author of the article good good good
  43. flicker
    flicker April 22 2020 00: 51 New
    +4
    “Zuleikha opens his eyes”
    Zuleikha stirs up enmity.
    For the sake of this enmity, a so-called novel was hastily created, hotly supported by all sorts of streets and her comrades, for the sake of this enmity, this series was also shot.
  44. phair
    phair April 22 2020 02: 25 New
    0
    To Hamatov in vain .... the author is not from the Lada (rear-wheel drive in the Far East, a curse word). Norm actress, serial defecation. Only zhurnalyuhi is more saleable, the second oldest.
  45. Free wind
    Free wind April 22 2020 05: 52 New
    +2
    Who orders these films? Who ordered the series about thieves, where Abdulov starred, spit on his grave? who sponsored gypsy films? The series gang, let its creators die. Gad thief. To ennoble killers, thieves ????? Who needs? gangsters and need.
  46. EvilLion
    EvilLion April 22 2020 08: 35 New
    +2
    Chulpan Khamatova just plays, she has been playing Chulpan Khamatova for more than twenty years and no one else.


    For the sake of justice, Andrei Mironov in all his roles, even in "The Diamond Hand", even in "The Twelve Chairs" also plays himself a beloved. True, unlike Khamatova, he is charismatic in himself.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 22 2020 10: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: EvilLion
      For the sake of justice, Andrei Mironov in all his roles, even in "The Diamond Hand", even in "The Twelve Chairs" also plays himself a beloved. True, unlike Khamatova, he is charismatic in himself.

      Like Mikhalkov. The master - he is in any film master. smile
  47. 2ez
    2ez April 22 2020 16: 21 New
    +3
    Quote: Varyag_0711
    Aron Zaawi (Aron)
    The film is really flat and template.
    You said it VERY softly. In fact, this is not a film, this is another shit-masterpiece from our shit-makers from modern cinema.
    The problem is that the authors and actors creating such films are that they themselves were never forced to overcome real difficulties in life.
    The problem is that with the collapse of the USSR and the abolition of censorship, actors, directors, scriptwriters, and even less consultants disappeared.
    The most disgusting thing is that the Soviet ACTORS, once respected by me, were blown away at one moment to the level of talentless and immoral banal actors. What have Mikhalkov, Tabakov, Dzhigarkhanyan, Akhedzhakova, Zbruev, Raikin, Basilashvili and other cinematic brothers-brothers become? Where did their talent go? Even my beloved and respected Gaidai was marked by a very mediocre comedy "Good weather on Deribasovskaya". For the new heroes of Ukraine a la Talashko, he is also senior lieutenant Skvortsov (only old people go to battle) I don't even want to remember.
    Hence the fair question, was there a boy? Maybe it was not they who were talents, but the system of Soviet cinema and censorship itself was talented, since it knew how to make talents out of them? After all, after the abolition of censorship, practically no worthy film appeared in our cinema. For me, the exception is "Quartet I", really talented guys who make quite a good movie. But that's probably all. Do not look at Dzhigarkhanyan in "The Best Film" or discuss his personal life, how he went crazy at the end of his life. I don't want to remember Raikin and Akhedzhakova either. And so in everything.
    Maybe people were right in the Middle Ages, who did not consider actors as people and buried them separately outside the fence of the cemetery, like lepers? Maybe this is not "ilita", but all the same the ram of the nation?

    Is Raikin an actor? Horse - YES, but the actor - no ...
  48. Joker62
    Joker62 April 22 2020 17: 18 New
    +3
    Cheap and complete lies! Watching TV shows is sickening ....
  49. DDT
    DDT April 22 2020 17: 41 New
    +4
    Yes ... comrades and not quite comrades, my question is this. What did you actually want ?! Do you even have an understanding that only now, when the children of the 90s became adults and began to "create" life, we see the catastrophe that happened to us, Soviet people? They grew up in a spiritless, aggressive, nihilistic world 90 -x, just physically and mentally unable to understand why and why we, conventional up-to-90s see what they are doing. And the fault is not really on the government. On you who were born in 60-70 years that we didn’t save your children from it. ”So we reap what we sowed.
  50. nikolaj1703
    nikolaj1703 April 22 2020 17: 57 New
    +4
    Unified film. A dummy template, perverting the story. Such people should not be allowed close to the cinema. It is impossible to measure the events of the 30s from the position of the twenty-first century.