Fast attack fleet: how Iranian boats chase U.S. Navy ships

84

Iran is increasingly using its maneuverable boats in the Persian Gulf against American ships. According to the Central Command of the U.S. Navy, recently an Iranian boat passed in dangerously close to an American ship.

When the US Navy conducted exercises involving ships and Apache AH-64E combat helicopters in the Persian Gulf, Iranian boats in the amount of 11 units repeatedly appeared near American ships, making dangerous and “challenging” maneuvers from the point of view of the US command. The boats belonged to the Corps of Guardians of the Islamic Revolution of Iran (IRGC), which, as you know, has at its disposal not only land, but also aviation, and marine units.



The incident, which provoked the indignation of the American naval command, occurred in the international waters of the Persian Gulf. Iranian boats appear here very often, periodically chasing American ships. In 2016, there was even an incident involving the capture of American sailors from two boats. Then the Iranian coast guard discovered American boats off the island of Farsi, after which it was decided to detain the Americans.

This time, boats of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps also made a name for themselves during the movement of American ships in the Persian Gulf. First, Iranian boats began to pursue the USS Lewis B. Puller, an expeditionary ship, following along with the destroyer USS Paul Hamilton, USS Firebolt patrol ships, USS Sirocco and USCGC Wrangell and USCGC Maui coast guard boats. The IRGC boats repeatedly crossed the path of American ships at extremely close range, while following at high speeds.


Despite numerous warnings from American warships in the form of radio messages and beeps, Iranian boats continued to maneuver in front of the US Navy ships for an entire hour. Only then did they react to American radio communications and cease their maneuvers.

Note that last year, the Commander of the Navy of the IRGC, Rear Admiral Ali Fadawi, said that Iran controls all movements of American ships in the Persian Gulf. Attention to American ships especially intensified after a new phase of exacerbation of the already extremely tense US-Iranian relations after the assassination of Al-Quds by General Kassem Suleimani by the Americans.


The naval forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps of Iran carry out expeditionary missions and protect Iranian interests in the Persian Gulf. They include ships, naval aviation, coastal artillery, and special forces. But the “highlight” of the Navy KSIR - fast and maneuverable patrol boats, which are the main instrument for indicating the military presence of Iran in the Persian Gulf.

Iran places particular emphasis on the maneuverability and speed of its military boats. So, the IRGC is actively using the Seraj-1 maneuvering boats, which, according to Iran’s ex-Minister of Defense, Major General Ahmad Wahidi, are capable of firing rockets and are equipped with modern navigation systems. The main advantage of the boat is the ability to operate at high speeds at sea. The main emphasis is precisely on the tactics of quick attacks with the subsequent retreat or capture of the ship, depending on the specific circumstances.

With the help of constant patrols on boats, the IRGC intends to maintain Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz and to demonstrate to Americans, as well as unfriendly Arab monarchies, their readiness at any time to switch from demonstrative maneuvers to real attacks on ships of a potential enemy.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 16 2020 13: 25
    Well, what danger can boats with machine guns pose for a full-fledged fleet? If they hadn’t made people laugh at whales ...
    Iran says boats can carry missiles ... which ones? Anti-tank (others just do not fit in size)? Against the ship, yeah.
    Lord, like children in a sandbox. Only with weapons.
    1. +5
      April 16 2020 13: 34
      Quote: Mytholog
      Well, what danger can boats with machine guns pose for a full-fledged fleet? If they hadn’t made people laugh at whales ...
      Iran says boats can carry missiles ... which ones? Anti-tank (others just do not fit in size)? Against the ship, yeah.
      Lord, like children in a sandbox. Only with weapons.

      There is a direct danger - for example, a boat with an explosive and a suicide bomber or an elementary possibility of a collision ... Yes, and any commander of any ship of any country has such behavior, at least
      1. -5
        April 16 2020 13: 37
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        There is a direct danger - for example, a boat with an explosive and a suicide bomber or an elementary possibility of a collision ... Yes, and any commander of any ship of any country has such behavior, at least
        Damage to one ship, beating a mosquito fleet.
        This is a transition to a full-fledged war.
        Does Iran need this? No.
        Nerves shake, no more. And the Yankees will be worn out. They are even more nerves shook ...
        1. +10
          April 16 2020 14: 19
          in fact, they are at home, and whoever does not want danger - let him drift along the Gulf of Mexico
          1. -4
            April 19 2020 15: 23
            Quote: novel xnumx
            actually, they’re at home,

            Like in an article on Russian it is written:
            Incidentthat outraged the U.S. Navy Command, occurred in international waters Persian Gulf.
            1. +5
              April 19 2020 16: 58
              Like, the Persians are not the Anglo-Sakas?
              1. -3
                April 19 2020 17: 00
                Quote: novel xnumx
                Like, the Persians are not the Anglo-Sakas?

                Correct conclusion and ...?
                1. +4
                  April 19 2020 17: 02
                  let the Anglo-Saxons swim in the Anglo-Saxon Gulf, kraynyak, in the Mexican ... only Latinos will be asked permission
                  1. -5
                    April 19 2020 17: 03
                    Quote: novel xnumx
                    let the Anglo-Saxons swim across the Anglo-Saxon Gulf,

                    A mysterious conclusion, but is there such a bay?
                    1. +5
                      April 19 2020 17: 04
                      I suspect this is the English Channel ....
                      1. -4
                        April 19 2020 17: 07
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        I suspect this is the English Channel ....

                        The English Channel, like the Pas de Calais, really belongs to the UK and has international free shipping status for third countries, but what does it have to do with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz?
                      2. +4
                        April 19 2020 17: 30
                        if the Iranians (Persians) walked the La Manche, the claims of the arrogant Saxons would have weight,
                      3. -5
                        April 19 2020 17: 35
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        if the Iranians (Persians) walked the La Manche, the claims of the arrogant Saxons would have weight,

                        no matter what they did to them, they would click their teeth with everything else. other matters the Navy of the IRI and the Navy of the IRGC IRI do not have such warships that would sail to the Foggy Albion .... ours are sailing with rescue tugs ...
                      4. +4
                        April 19 2020 18: 31
                        walk, still walk ...
                      5. +5
                        April 19 2020 19: 49
                        walk, still walk ...

                        Someone is walking, but something is swimming ... feel
                      6. +4
                        April 19 2020 20: 29
                        we are talking about ours .. our go .. even smoked sometimes
                      7. +4
                        April 19 2020 20: 41
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        although sometimes smoked

                        for that they see for several miles .... and they begin to be afraid in advance ... wink
                    2. +5
                      April 19 2020 19: 41
                      But is there such a bay?

                      Problems? It will be necessary to do wink
                      1. +4
                        April 19 2020 20: 27
                        no, Vasya, this is to the Sumerians .. they will dig ..
                  2. +5
                    April 19 2020 19: 37
                    let the Anglo-Saxons swim along the Anglo-Saxon Gulf, kraynyak, along the Mexican ...

                    In the light of recent events .... only the native coast, will be more alive hi
                    1. +4
                      April 19 2020 20: 28
                      By the way, it applies to everyone!
                      1. +5
                        April 19 2020 20: 35
                        In general, everywhere they write SIDI HOUSES, SIDI HOUSES !!! From all channels on television they say SIDI HOME, SIDI HOME !!!
                        I sat at home for three days, sat ... tired kapets! There was no direct force already! And then I thought: Yes, to hell with them! Well, who sees me?
                        And LEG! And soooo straight I felt good! laughing
                      2. +4
                        April 19 2020 20: 52
                        well done! lol hi request so somehow
                      3. +4
                        April 19 2020 21: 09
                        Quote: Mouse
                        In general, everywhere they write SIDI HOUSES, SIDI HOUSES !!! From all channels on television they say SIDI HOME, SIDI HOME !!!
                        I sat at home for three days, sat ... tired kapets! There was no direct force already! And then I thought: Yes, to hell with them! Well, who sees me?
                        And LEG! And soooo straight I felt good! laughing

                        lol good good
      2. KCA
        +3
        April 16 2020 13: 40
        The Hussites tried, though in the port of Aden, the USS Cole destroyer didn’t sank miraculously, there was such a hole in the board that even stop by car, it’s a pity it didn’t reach the waterline
        1. +1
          April 16 2020 14: 09
          Quote: KCA
          The Hussites tried, though in the port of Aden, the USS Cole destroyer did not miraculously sink

          There the ship was moored! In a port with fairly dense traffic. And the guard, obviously, counted the raven. In the open sea, this boat for a couple of hundred meters could approach at best, after which it would turn into a sieve.
        2. +4
          April 16 2020 14: 12
          The Hussites then sat in the mountains and kept an agreement with Saleh, and Saleh with them. 6 more years before the uprising, and 9 until active battles.

          The AKAP fighters blew up the count. This is the local Al Qaeda.

          There is decently under. And he scored a lot. Actually, the ship was saved by the fact that the boat exploded quite successfully, well, the wild coaching of the American crews on the BZZ, otherwise it would have repeated the fate of the Norwegian frigate.



          After that, in the United States and Western countries, another contour of the ship’s defense was actually created - against martyrs. Rather, it was similar before, but it didn’t have serious means on the ground, and as the incident showed, there are seconds for action. Therefore, today western ships bristled not only with remote and turret firing points, but also with anti-piracy / shahidny rapid-fire submachine guns.


          Unfortunately, the Russian Navy still thinks that this is not necessary. And if necessary, then 2 MTPU with Kord or KPVT is enough for a frigate / BOD. And just like the Americans in the 2000th, he believes that if something happens, we’ll turn over the Volcano, that is, the AK-630M / gunner and vuuuhhhhh will blow all the martyrs away. Only in practice, even a combat post appropriate to activate can not be in time. What the Americans were convinced by the example of Kohl.
        3. 0
          April 16 2020 14: 20
          How did it come
      3. +2
        April 16 2020 14: 10
        4-6 12,7 mm. machine guns with radar will reduce to zero any danger to the navy ship from light boat boats with explosives.
    2. 0
      April 16 2020 13: 51
      On the one hand, you are right, but on the other, in the war it’s not whoever has the best weapon, but the one who is stronger in spirit.
      1. +2
        April 16 2020 14: 12
        Quote: Svetlana
        On the one hand, you are right, but on the other, in the war it’s not whoever has the best weapon, but the one who is stronger in spirit.

        If the weapon is much better, then no strength of spirit is enough.
      2. -1
        April 16 2020 16: 45
        I immediately remembered the battle of the British with the Zulus, where they were weighed down by the colonialist, since they were not mentally prepared for close combat.
        But then the courage and fortitude of the Zulus wars crashed against British machine guns.
        Courage is power, but you cannot go far alone.
      3. +1
        April 16 2020 18: 47
        "On the one hand, you are right, but on the other hand, it is not the one with the best weapon that wins in the war, but the one who is stronger in spirit."
        It is not a matter of weapons and fortitude (but this is not accurate).
        It is more about the time of reaction to the threat.
        On the boat, small arms (as far as I know) are not hung from bulkheads. In addition, you still try to get somewhere from a machine gun when the sea is rough! But this is lyrics.
        The process itself! ... Calculation of the machine gun — must run after his weapons to the weapons storage room, then run to the top, then equip the whole kitchen and finally start shooting.
        A steamboat is not a football field and running around it is very troublesome.
        Of course they will tell me that when they enter the zone, machine guns will be deployed initially. But where do we get so many competent machine gunners in the e-page?
    3. -1
      April 16 2020 14: 05
      perform expeditionary tasks and protect Iranian interests in the Persian Gulf.

      --It's not in the Gulf of Mexico. Persians in oil also understand a lot
    4. -1
      April 16 2020 14: 17
      Tell it to Cole Destroyer
    5. 0
      April 16 2020 14: 44
      "This is what gives me the spirit, That I do not fight at all I can get into big bullies" (c)
    6. -2
      April 16 2020 15: 03
      Quote: Mytholog
      Well, what danger can boats with machine guns pose for a full-fledged fleet? If they hadn’t made people laugh at whales ...

      Well, do not tell me, if there are a lot of them, then during the attack ....
      For a long time here the article was about this, like a military game in the General Staff of the USA .. In short, those who were for Iran defeated the AUGs, etc. ..
      So Iran chose the right tactics .. And the United States knows this, although of course they can even bang yao for Iran .. That's where the Yankens choose who they are going to fight for and what it will cost them .. hi
    7. +1
      April 16 2020 15: 08
      Quote: Mytholog
      Well, what danger can boats with machine guns pose for a full-fledged fleet? If they hadn’t made people laugh at whales ...

      Maybe this ... "striped whales" already know this well

    8. +2
      April 19 2020 21: 00
      Quote: Mytholog
      Anti-tank (others just do not fit in size)? Against the ship, yeah.

      Shmalnut a couple of ATGMs in the "captain's cabin" !!! wink You see, the Amer ship will be left without a commander !!! wassat
  2. +9
    April 16 2020 13: 29
    I wonder how many seconds Volcano Falanx will take to smash these battleships to dust?
    1. KCA
      +2
      April 16 2020 13: 42
      How much time to dust apart? One? Two? Three? And five more will come aboard with a ton of RDX on each
    2. +1
      April 16 2020 13: 46
      But there is also a 127-mm Mk-45.

      And for such katerki and 12.7x99 will be painful.
      1. KCA
        +2
        April 16 2020 13: 55
        And what is the negative elevation angle of the Phalanx and MK-45? At what minimum distance can they work on water? How quickly can they transfer fire from board to side? From the bow to the stern, the cabin will not interfere? It is enough to slip into the dead zone and that’s all, and out of a dozen boats that will go from all 360 degrees, at least one, but it will come, a person also needs a split second to slam a mosquito (mosquito), but they will sit down immediately 10 and all over the body. ..
    3. -1
      April 16 2020 13: 51
      Quote: Amateur
      to dust these

      To dust or to pieces, but a little:

      One really should not make an adversary a fool. Wow, the boats were frightened ... Yes, they give out these for free, apparently with fear ...
    4. 0
      April 16 2020 14: 42
      they won’t even use them on Arly Burke, for this purpose, after the Cole incident, the Bushmasters

      and recently they began to set up such things with different types of missiles, including against martyrs-boats

      or such
    5. +1
      April 19 2020 21: 16
      Quote: Amateur
      I wonder how many seconds Volcano Falanx will take to smash these battleships to dust?

      runoff, lope and in May 1987, 17 !!! wink lol

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82_%D1%81_%D1%84%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC_%C2%AB%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%C2%BB
  3. +3
    April 16 2020 13: 31
    What can a similar boat do to a normal warship except to load a couple of centners of explosives and a ram. request hi
    1. +1
      April 16 2020 13: 54
      This is a one-time "trick", after which the boats will not be able to approach the distance of a cannon shot.
      1. 0
        April 16 2020 17: 54
        Far not a fact.
        1. -1
          April 16 2020 20: 57
          Fact! Do you think Americans are dumber than themselves? After blasting such a boat under a warship or support vessel, will you continue to ignore it, or will you start hunting for them with all available means? And the fact that the Americans have enough funds for these purposes is better not to doubt: starting from heavy machine guns, ending with aviation.
          1. +2
            April 19 2020 21: 17
            Quote: Horon
            Do you think Americans are dumber than themselves?

            here the question mark is superfluous !! wassat
  4. +2
    April 16 2020 13: 35
    Well, here's what I just read? what Ode to stupidity? If the order to destroy the boats is given, their crews will not even have time to get scared, despite the speed and maneuverability! fool
    1. 0
      April 16 2020 17: 56
      And if at night it will be?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -4
        April 16 2020 19: 56
        Quote: Petrol cutter
        And if at night it will be?

        I remembered the anecdote: "And so that the rocket does not burn out, we will fly to the Sun at night."
      3. -2
        April 16 2020 20: 59
        For radars, thermal imagers and night vision devices, there is no night.
        1. +1
          April 18 2020 20: 10
          Radars and NVD are far from a panacea. In addition, I did not conduct a conversation for these motor boats. But, for the use of full-fledged shopping malls and RTOs.
          As soon as your NVD sees something behind the smoke curtain.
          Whether the radar will see subtle TCs is a very big question.
          And whether it is designed to detect surface small speed targets is a big question.
          1. +1
            April 18 2020 20: 25
            MRK- generally hit without entering the affected area.
            Especially since machine-gun fire. There are suspicions ...
          2. -1
            April 19 2020 18: 16
            Besides, I didn’t speak for these motor boats.

            Strange, the article talks about these boats, I talk about these boats and their real combat potential, and you talk about others, but project on the situation with Iranian boats and prove to me that they are a superweapon against full-weight US ships ...! I do not understand what is the essence of your claims to my assessment of the combat potential of Iranian boats? Can I put RCC on them? Can they attack ships without entering the melee weapons destruction zone? Radars detect a periscope sticking out of the water at a distance greater than the radius of destruction of anti-aircraft guns, why should they stop seeing boats? Once again, these boats, not the ones you think of! hi
  5. +3
    April 16 2020 13: 37
    Note that last year, the commander of the Navy of the IRGC, Rear Admiral Ali Fadawi, said that Iran controls all the movements of American ships in the Persian Gulf.

    It is very loudly said, "they control" ... Such boats, if desired, will be launched to the bottom at a time, at a decent distance.
  6. 0
    April 16 2020 13: 37
    All right, Khan Americans laughing
  7. +1
    April 16 2020 13: 44
    a small flea bites meaner ... Iran opposes the United States to the best of its ability ... well done ...
  8. 0
    April 16 2020 13: 52
    And this is not a tactic of "wolf packs" from Bandersmarinen, is it very similar? If they tried to spin around the Russian ships, what would be the result?
    1. +2
      April 16 2020 17: 57
      This is more like the tactics of Japanese TCs.
      True, people preferred to work at night.
      It is quite logical, and the surcharge for labor at night is more. bully
  9. -1
    April 16 2020 13: 59
    Quote: KCA
    How much time to dust apart? One? Two? Three? And five more will come aboard with a ton of RDX on each

    They will stop. Opening fire is tantamount to the outbreak of hostilities. And precisely because of this, the Iranians do what they do :)
  10. +1
    April 16 2020 14: 12
    I have another question - what does the ship do shore US Guards in the Persian Gulf? And how did he get there?

    In the photo USCGC Wrangell
    1. +1
      April 16 2020 14: 22
      By sea, ocean. And what does it surprise? There they have a base in the bay if that wink
    2. +5
      April 16 2020 14: 22
      definitely, the coast has beguiled !! laughing
    3. +2
      April 16 2020 14: 55
      Due to the flag, used as a sail laughing
    4. 0
      April 17 2020 09: 34
      and by the way. Who knows what the second big American ship on the video is some kind of strange design
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    April 16 2020 14: 28
    By the way, the Iranians there feel themselves immortal. On the 14th, they tried to abort the Chinese Tanker.

    CHINA-FLAGGED TANKER "SC TAIPEI"(IMO 9175535, 22,377 DWT) PURPORTEDLY FELL UNDER ARMED ATTACK IN GULF OF OMAN AT 12:48 UTC BY IRANIAN NAVY /IRGC. VESSEL WAS SAILING TO JUBAIL, SAUDI ARABIA. NOW OFF IRANIAN COAST... VIA


    Fighting Them Back - Dutch Royal Navy's Frigate "HNLMS De Ruyter" has just entered the Gulf of Oman and is thus relatively close to the tanker SC Taipei.

    SC Taipei is now anchored in the approaches to the Strait of Hormuz. It appeared to have been briefly seized by Iranian authorities on Tuesday. Dutch frigate HNLMS De Ruyter is nearby but turned off its AIS signal at 1813 UTC.

    In short, either the Dutch frigate frightened off, or the Chinese partners reported that the Iranians had completely beguiled the coast. And the Iranians left to look for other intruders who called at Saudi ports.
    1. 0
      April 16 2020 15: 06
      Taipei is not the Chinese, this is Taiwan
      1. 0
        April 16 2020 15: 22
        Shanghai is wink

        Aoxing Ship Management Limited is its owner. It was flying the flag of Hong Kong. Well, the current owner of ASML pays taxes in Shanghai. Therefore - beguiled. wink
        1. -1
          April 16 2020 15: 23
          Strange name
          Type Taipei, our city?
          1. 0
            April 16 2020 15: 25
            Well, this is Chinese characteristics. For them, Taipei is China, temporarily lost, but China.
  13. +1
    April 16 2020 14: 34
    Quote: donavi49
    By sea, ocean. And what does it surprise? There they have a base in the bay if that wink


    It is surprising that this PCA is also of the "Island" class; the Ukrainians still could not transport two PCs of this class. He would never get to life on his own from the USA ...
  14. 0
    April 16 2020 14: 35
    small bug and smelly.
  15. -1
    April 16 2020 15: 07
    There has already been an article with examples that boats can damage boats only by accident and weakly.

    As soon as the Amers get tired, they will arrange a provocation and drown.
    They will not be sure to wait for a loss of face.
    1. 0
      April 16 2020 16: 55
      One torpedo tube per boat, 10 boats. Hands at a distance. And only frigate al will want to rock the boat more. The first shot on the boat and he is at the bottom. Just an option to contain arrogant. But for a full-blown war will not work.
      1. -2
        April 16 2020 18: 40
        Here in that article and examples were given. The first shot on the boat and they are at the bottom. Boats.

        A photo of the only successful bombing of a moored ship by a martyr-boat was laid out on top of the mass.
  16. +1
    April 16 2020 17: 33
    And I said, the base of torpedo boats is cool! Well, rocket-generally weigh! ... bully
    Hence the conclusion - gentlemen, buy products from SZ "More" in the range. And a good mood will not leave you anymore! ...
  17. 0
    April 16 2020 20: 52
    if the machine gun is on the sharp nose of the boat, then what kind of on-board fire towards the enemy can we talk about? These are some misunderstandings created to disperse the beach nude sunbathers in violation of Sharia law.
  18. -3
    April 16 2020 21: 59
    the volcano-phalanx workstation perfectly fulfills subsonic rocket protection and for boats (it takes them 15 miles to get a radar), there is an ass there even at a speed of 60 knots, by the way, the higher the speed of the watercraft, the easier it is for a volcano to program it
  19. 0
    April 17 2020 17: 18
    Quick attack fleet
    ?!
    Rather, the Fleet will be the only attack.
  20. +1
    April 19 2020 00: 03
    It’s right not to let the Yankees live peacefully, let them clean where they came from.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"