The British press appreciated the Russian sniper rifle SVLK-14C "Twilight"

The British press appreciated the Russian sniper rifle SVLK-14C "Twilight"

The British press spoke about the "Twilight" rifle, appreciating its merits. It's about sniper weaponsdeveloped by LOBAEV Arms and operated since 2012.


The sniper rifle has a length of 1570 mm, a mass of 9,6 kg. The British newspaper Daily Mail (DM) noted that the Russian rifle is capable of "changing the rules of the game." In this context, we are talking about the fact that the rifle is capable of hitting targets at a record distance. In a British newspaper, it is indicated that it hits the target “at a distance of about two miles” (3220 km).

In fact, during the operation of the SVLK-14C "Sumrak" hit was hit in the target from a distance of 4,2 km.

The article says that the shooting parameters for the range of the Russian "Twilight" almost double that of the British sniper complex L115A3. This sniper rifle, which the British are armed with, is capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 1,6 km.

In the Daily Mail it is noted that SVLK-14C "Twilight" is intended for professional snipers. At the same time, an expert opinion is given, which indicates that the Russian rifle is capable of radically changing the situation on the battlefield.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B April 14 2020 06: 58 New
    • 16
    • 2
    +14
    But is it accepted for service?
    Especially in the army?
    And in general, “Sumarak” (like?) Exists in single record copies.
    almost double the similar parameters of the British sniper complex L115A3.
    Compare with an army rifle ...
    Not Camille ...
    1. Errr April 14 2020 07: 37 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: Victor_B
      And in general, “Sumarak” (like?) Exists in single record copies.
      "Lobaev and company" offer to shop. The official price of "Twilight" is 1945000 rubles. smile
      http://lobaevarms.ru/twilight/
      1. thinker April 14 2020 07: 59 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        As I understand it, the British will cost even more yes
        Russia develops world DEADLIEST sniper rife: £30,000 'game-changer' gun can hit targets TWO MILES away
        1. Errr April 14 2020 08: 17 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          £ 30000 at the current rate will be equal to ₽2757831. These are still flowers in comparison with what our traders are asking for. "Air Gun", for example, wants to get from the client for "Twilight" already ₽3264000. smile
          https://www.air-gun.ru/nareznoe_oruzhie/lobaevarms_(rossiya)/sverhdalnoboynaya_vintovka_svlk-14s_twilight_sumrak_418st_optika_kronshteyn_soshki_v_komplekte
        2. Deck April 14 2020 08: 37 New
          • 22
          • 10
          +12
          The article is not even clear how to comment. The Daily Mail is a tabloid newspaper like Speed ​​Info. Accuracy International AWM (L115A3) Fires LM.338 rounds. A proven army cartridge, which is in service with many countries of the world, including ours. Dusk has a 40 Lobaev improved cartridge. Based on the 408 CheyTac liner, but enlarged with a .375 bullet. A single, tuned manual assembly cartridge. L115A3 "is capable of hitting targets at a distance of 1,6 km." Hitting targets !!! And not getting hit from the 20th shot. Any anyone can check the energy of a bullet for 4 km on a ballistic calculator. By the way, in the USA there are clubs and special competitions for shooting for 2 miles.
          And in order for the “Russian rifle to radically change the situation on the battlefield”, the following conditions must be provided: target recognition at such a distance (no smoke, fog, mirage, that is, cloudy weather or an early quiet morning), uniform wind throughout the trajectory, especially given its height.
          Bullets generally fly far. There were cases of accidental wounds from small fry at 1,5 km. An army sniper is not an athlete. He has limited ammunition and, most importantly, time.
          In general, they are sick of advertising Lobaev Arms
          1. grandfather_Kostya April 14 2020 09: 40 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            in order for the “Russian rifle to radically change the situation on the battlefield” the following conditions must be provided: target recognition at such a distance (no smoke, fog, mirage, that is, cloudy weather or an early quiet morning), uniform wind along the entire trajectory, especially considering it heights.

            Add: the goal needs to be tied with a rope to the chair. the flight time of the bullet is about 4 seconds and who will wait for it (if it is not sentry at the mausoleum).
            1. Ingenegr April 15 2020 16: 45 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              At 4 km the bullet does not fly for 4 seconds, but much longer. The order is 10 ... 15 seconds. Therefore, even a target tied to a chair will be able to gallop if the chair is not nailed to the ground with crutches.
          2. Alexfly April 14 2020 17: 50 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Absolutely right, dear
          3. tracer April 15 2020 19: 26 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            +100500 There is little that can be added, I am silent about the fact that the flight time of the bullet will be such that the target can go drink tea. She will not change anything on the battlefield AT ALL!
            For targets at such distances, there is another much more effective weapon. ARTILLERY FOR EXAMPLE .... "Bam Bam ... and past" (Pugovkin, Wedding in Robin)
            1. Rusfaner April 15 2020 21: 14 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              "... For targets at such distances, there is another much more effective weapon. ARTILLERY ..."

              For example: MT-12
  2. Maki Avellevich April 14 2020 07: 00 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    during the operation of the SVLK-14C “Sumrak”, hits were hit at the target from a distance of 4,2 km.

    when shooting at such distances it is very difficult to find a shooter who can make an accurate shot.
    The Coriolis effect is harmful.
    the distance is impressive. True, the use of weapons is specific. special purpose.
    1. Victor_B April 14 2020 07: 01 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: Maki Avellevich
      the distance is impressive.

      At the height of the trajectory, the bullet flies at an altitude of 800 (!) Meters!
      The target is turned half up, for the bullet "almost" vertically falls.
      1. The leader of the Redskins April 14 2020 07: 05 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        This is already ... What a mortar!))) laughing
        But in general, I agree, it is not in the troops and it will not be able to be used there. We virtually assume the MTR, but I think no one is going to set records there either. Better "come closer")))
        1. Aag
          Aag April 14 2020 08: 32 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          They got ahead of them: “..., it’s not in the troops and it will not be able to be used there. We virtually assume the MTR ...” The SVD will obviously not take the place.
          And how will Al-alloys be friends with stainless steel (electroplating, corrosion resistance)?
          Remember, at one time they criticized Beretta for such a combination of metals. True, in the Navy.
      2. aybolyt678 April 14 2020 08: 04 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        there should be a howitzer sight, on the side of the barrel, because the barrel in this case overlaps the line of sight
    2. den3080 April 14 2020 07: 07 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: Maki Avellevich
      during the operation of the SVLK-14C “Sumrak”, hits were hit at the target from a distance of 4,2 km.

      when shooting at such distances it is very difficult to find a shooter who can make an accurate shot.
      The Coriolis effect is harmful.
      the distance is impressive. True, the use of weapons is specific. special purpose.

      one rifle and not only a shooter, there is a whole team.
      there is a film about this miracle.
      can be compared with the cars of the formula 1 - piece copies.
    3. Shopping Mall April 14 2020 08: 19 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Maki Avellevich
      during the operation of the SVLK-14C “Sumrak”, hits were hit at the target from a distance of 4,2 km.

      when shooting at such distances it is very difficult to find a shooter who can make an accurate shot.
      The Coriolis effect is harmful.
      the distance is impressive. True, the use of weapons is specific. special purpose.


      Previously, Lobaev’s company actively worked with the FSO and supplied them with SVL rifles.

      Long-range shooting is becoming more common for the military, even without guided bullets. The appearance of large-caliber (12,7 mm) rifles has already made normal shooting at a distance of 1,5 km, some manage to shoot beyond 2 km - such confirmed cases are in Afghanistan.

      But SVLK is a small-scale weapon, like ammunition for it.
  3. Aag
    Aag April 14 2020 07: 03 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "At the same time, an expert opinion is given, which indicates that the Russian rifle is capable of radically changing the situation on the battlefield."
    “Dramatically,” it is strongly said. In other publications, by the way, this word is missing: “... it can change the usual situation on the battlefield.”
    Sold by "Air Gun" ..
  4. Kelwin April 14 2020 07: 26 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Selling soul for 5 pitches)
  5. Thrifty April 14 2020 07: 34 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Is it hunting rabbits in the desert? Indeed, the real distance of its practical application is much smaller! The goal must be hit with a guarantee, here a hundred factors must be kept in mind continuously! Shot from the SVD at 250 meters, and then the crosswind is still a hindrance! And if you hit 900 meters? I’m generally silent about the distance to the target of 2000 meters! This is the super-specialist "work" !!!
    1. Narak-zempo April 14 2020 07: 51 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Mattresses in this caliber have already experimented with guided bullets. Somewhere in the material was. I think we also have such ones, but they are not yet shining. And for the sake of the conditional Dudaev or the conditional Yandarbiev, or the conditional Navalny, if they swing, they will not spare such a bullet, no matter how much it costs. Here the range of the rifle will play.
      1. tracer April 16 2020 00: 57 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        There are devices even more cunning on such devils. They’ll also affect the whole business, but since there are far calibres, there’s a lot of things, probably more
        1. Narak-zempo April 16 2020 13: 11 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          How much does one Caliber cost to pensions? As the President said, you know how to count - so count. It turns out a little expensive to spend on every scum rocket.
          1. tracer April 16 2020 15: 06 New
            • 0
            • 3
            -3
            Is that what you call retirees "bastards"? You still remember about kindergartens and hospitals, sick kids, remember poor mothers, poor two-meter youngs who retire as a hindrance. "Tanks with missiles" are primary everything else is secondary. There will be no power and striking power in the state, all of the listed categories will be burned in stoves or they will be killed by a virus, or else God knows what. They are the "ballast" and so the "market" resolves them. Because those who clang their teeth at the borders of Russia only on the "markets with democracy" and trust.
            1. Narak-zempo April 16 2020 15: 25 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Do not distort. I meant that for every Dudaev or Navalny spending a rocket worth several thousand pensions is unprofitable. A bullet, even a controlled one, will be much more budget-friendly.
              1. tracer April 16 2020 16: 40 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                I am amazed how fantastically far you are from the military theme. You simply do not understand, in principle, even theories of how such devils are eliminated. How they are protected, by barmels and other features with their special services and personal protection. Yes, of course, in your understanding, a warrior creeps up for 3 kilometers and crawls away on his own. Funny, he seems to have come to infantilism, but apparently you were hooked.
                1. Narak-zempo April 17 2020 09: 01 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  And how are they protected?
                  Lee Harvey Oswald had a simple Manlicher rifle.
    2. ssergey1978 April 14 2020 08: 00 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      What a hindrance for 250 meters, do not make people laugh. Up to 400 meters as amended, you can not steam.
      1. Ingenegr April 15 2020 16: 51 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        By itself. What is a tabular wind drift of a bullet under a side wind of 4 m / s at 42 cm by 400 m for SVD? In general, you can not steam. Just about one dimension of the chest figure.
        By the way, under the same wind, drift at 200 m will be 10 cm, and at 300 - 26 cm. Is it definitely not necessary to take into account?
        1. ssergey1978 April 15 2020 18: 51 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          A lot of theory, I propose to shoot, preferably more.
          1. Ingenegr April 15 2020 20: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            We question the effect of wind on the flight of a bullet at ranges up to 400 meters? An interesting approach.
            Quote: ssergey1978
            A lot of theory, I propose to shoot, preferably more.

            And without a theory in shooting, dear, you won’t go far. As for the "... shoot, preferably more" - where is the confidence that I am not doing this?
            1. ssergey1978 April 16 2020 05: 00 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Because whoever shoots doesn’t write such a crap.
              1. Ingenegr April 16 2020 08: 25 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Those who shoot regularly further than 100 meters have no doubt about the influence of the wind.
                1. ssergey1978 April 16 2020 11: 54 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  I shoot further and shoot from 7.62x39 and up to 300 meters I have no wind problems, what can I say about 7.62x54
                  1. Ingenegr April 16 2020 14: 22 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    It is necessary to decide between "I don’t feel problems with the wind" and "I don’t take into account the wind up to 400." These are different things. When shooting at the head "Orthodox" 7.62x54 up to 600 m with moderate winds, I also have no problems. But this does not mean that you do not have to consider the correction for crosswind. If anyone shoots only at calm and at closed shooting ranges, it’s not a question, they have nothing to consider.
        2. Rusfaner April 15 2020 21: 36 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Plus, at 800 m the bullet goes into subsonic mode and reduces the trajectory by 8 meters ...
    3. aybolyt678 April 14 2020 08: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Thrifty
      This is the super-specialist "work" !!!

      in the parameters of the shot there is a correction for the angular velocity of rotation of the Earth laughing
      1. voyaka uh April 14 2020 08: 16 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        And on the position of the moon and Jupiter at the time of the shot laughing
        Even at 800 meters, fixed-target professional snipers
        think twice "is it worth it to shoot?" before you press the shutter release.
      2. Aag
        Aag April 14 2020 08: 35 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        When using bullets with a steel core, magnetic declination must be considered ... laughing
    4. 72jora72 April 14 2020 10: 33 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Shot from the SVD at 250 meters, and then the crosswind is still a hindrance! And if you hit 900 meters
      I have a CZ bolt mount, a scope with a R12 net, a deer I shoot from 300-600 meters, for 200 meters I have an SCS without a sight.
  6. GTYCBJYTH2021 April 14 2020 07: 43 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    A rifle-gun is fired at 4 (four) kilometers ..... The special patron there, apparently, with rocket fuel ....... The curvature of the earth was not taken into account .... the wind .... In the desert, shoot from it, do not otherwise ..... in the baobab ....
    1. Lycan April 14 2020 10: 13 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      There steering reactive micro nozzles for path correction laughing
  7. JonnyT April 14 2020 08: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is very interesting what kind of optical sight it has - most likely a ballistic computer, not Israeli?
  8. Alex_T April 14 2020 08: 30 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    There is a video in yputube on how to achieve such records for 4 km. A whole team works with weather stations and observers, more than a dozen rounds and several hours are spent on sighting. Such shooting is suitable for records, but not for military use. In combat conditions, a mortar or gun will be used.
    1. Threaded screw April 14 2020 10: 38 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Such shooting is good for records.
      Such shooting is suitable for testing the capabilities of a rifle. World practice.
  9. mr.ZinGer April 14 2020 08: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Change drastically .... not a rifle but a van der waffe
  10. Azazelo April 14 2020 08: 35 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Another scarecrow for Europeans. The author of the pack did not figure out either the "Twilight" or the topic at all .... again money is being beaten out for the arms
  11. Alexander X April 14 2020 09: 20 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    This rifle allows you to solve specific problems. The defeat of particularly important targets at extraordinary distances for classic sniper weapons. Naturally, the cartridges for such a rifle should be equipped with accurate filigree. With tolerances for the manufacture of shells, bullets in microns and tolerances for the weight of the charge and projectile per milligram, or maybe even less. This is not a machine gun or even a SVD. Therefore, it does not matter how much the exotic gunpowder case and bullet are used. And it is going to manually. Relatively speaking, several pieces of ammunition can be made even from platinum. Yes, and dozens of such rifles should be delivered to the army, well, maybe hundreds. For snipers of this class, in order to be able to shoot at such distances with dignity, you can count the fingers on the fingers. Well, the sound of a rifle shot over 4 km can not be heard. So you can shoot ... A very worthy weapon in its class. It is wonderful that they know how to make it and they produce it in Russia.
  12. Mihail2019 April 14 2020 09: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Correct a typo - 3220 m, not km.
  13. Peter is not the first April 14 2020 09: 54 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    This rifle is primarily a technological achievement, like high fashion that no one wears, but everyone goes and "admires" this high fashion, and they wear consumer goods from China. So here, this is a rifle for single (single) snipers. Such a rifle can radically change the situation in a theater of operations if it is used to destroy not the calculations of machine gunners and ATGMs, but the general (president) who decided to inspect the leading edge, but for him this edge begins and ends no closer than five kilometers from the real line of contact. And I'm not saying that they will shoot from record distances.
  14. Vasyan1971 April 14 2020 10: 35 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    At the same time, an expert opinion is given, which indicates that the Russian rifle is capable of radically changing the situation on the battlefield.

    Yes? And I thought that an ambush tank battalion could "radically change the situation on the battlefield ..."
  15. iouris April 14 2020 10: 41 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Where is it used? Practice is the only objective criterion.
  16. Incvizitor April 14 2020 14: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In order to work with such a thing, she still needs a sight for some 500 thousand, and if the thermal imager is so much for a lemon.
  17. KSVK April 14 2020 14: 41 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    At such distances, the correct calculation of the trajectory has a greater influence. The accuracy of the rifle is secondary. 1600 m for the 338 LM caliber is the distance to which an ordinary (lead in a tompak shell) bullet arrives even at supersonic speed. When a bullet switches to subsonic, the bullet's CD changes sharply with very unpleasant consequences. When establishing range records, the so-called solid. Homogeneous alloy bullets. And they sharpen them from the bar on very precise machines. This eliminates the "trouble" with the transition of the bullet to subsonic. The advantage is almost perfect aerodynamics and high BC. And the trunks of Lobaev are really made using unique technology. But, as far as I know, this affects the resource of the barrel more than its accuracy. Just rifles with a technical accuracy of less than 0,1 arc minutes are not uncommon now. Although they are not cheap.
    All of the above, however, does not negate the admiration for the huge work done. As with the fitting of the "iron", and actually with the preparation and implementation of such a shot. After all, no one condemns the sport of "high achievements" for its inapplicability and unattainability for ordinary people. So here is a demonstration of achievements.
  18. akims April 14 2020 15: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In Vietnam, an American sniper shot dead in front of a crowd of people a messenger on a bike from 3,5 km. I once read in the Soldier of Fortune, the year in 95th.
  19. il-z April 14 2020 16: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    At the same time, an expert opinion is given, which indicates that the Russian rifle is capable of radically changing the situation on the battlefield.

    IMHO in real combat operations at ranges of 1 km or more, the sniper fire of artillery and ATGMs, as well as not necessarily the sniper MLRS, can radically affect the situation on the battlefield. And the influence of "Twilight", including due to its "saturation" in the RF Armed Forces, is vanishingly small (tends to zero).
  20. Mwg
    Mwg April 15 2020 16: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "The British newspaper indicates that it hits the target" at a distance of about two miles "(3220 km)" - the rifle is undoubtedly wonderful, but where can I get so many trained snipers that would fire 3 km? Obviously not an ordinary weapon
  21. Genie April 15 2020 17: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I had a BARNARD-P rouge bike. In the sense, based on the bolt group assembled. Two trunks Montana 308 and 6,5x55. A very similar concept.
  22. Romanenko April 15 2020 17: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Dusk is more a prototype than a working rifle, it’s certainly great to hit a 1x1 meter target at a distance of 4,2 km, this is an indicator of quality and high technologies used in the manufacture of sniper weapons, but you must understand that in real life such shooting is not in demand, a bullet flies this distance is about 19 seconds.
    Therefore, one must correctly understand the reaction of the British, they also do not imply that now regiments armed with Twilight will appear in the army of the Russian Federation.
    This is just a quality assessment.
    I personally see greater perspectives for our snipers in the development of the microwave subject, this is a worthy replacement for the respected and well-deserved, but already outdated SVD.
    1. Genie April 15 2020 17: 44 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Any Sako-75, even Hunter, is better than SVD.
      1. Romanenko April 15 2020 17: 48 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        I wouldn’t wipe my feet about SVD, it’s just that she’s already old, although she still has a huge number of fans.
        In 1980, when I got to know her fairly close, I honestly say that I was delighted as if I were talking to a beautiful woman who, in the process of communicating, sets a fairly strict framework, but punctually fulfills all the agreements.
        1. Genie April 15 2020 17: 53 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          This is when there is nothing else. But, you see, the "minute" and 2.5 for SVD, the difference.
          Itself once worked with SVD. But even a hunting carbine allows you to confidently shoot at 800m at Warminta (a sports target), which you can’t get from SVD.
          1. tracer April 16 2020 00: 39 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Dear friend, as a person who spent some time in the mountains with this device, I will tell you so. About a minute and 2.5 minutes, apparently ... SVD IS A SNIPER RIFT adopted by the Soviet and Russian army. It has its own tasks, such as "supporting combat units in offensive and defense." So battle formations attack an adversary who is quite a man, and not a “warmint” or some gopher. Therefore, this target has overall dimensions AT DIFFERENT distances. The SVD rifle in caliber 7,62x54R has a range of effective use, and so at all this range the rifle fits into these targets. That is why it was created. No one says that there is no “better” with greater range or accuracy, but this rifle was created in its niche of semi-automatic rifles of small dimensions and weight. WHERE the sniper must move in the composition of the unit. Varmint, accuracy, "llyalya" poplar. Level "Kalash punches the rail."
            1. Timeout April 17 2020 03: 41 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              [
              Quote: tracer
              like a person who spent some time in the mountains with this device

              Again "tracer" in his repertoire. With what “apparatus” can a bread-cutting sniper crawl in the “mountains”? The campaign decided to crush the novoreg with "authority" ... But both of them lie like gray geldings.
              Quote: tracer
              It It has its own tasks such as "supporting the combat unit in the offensive and defense."

              Who is she? SVD? To go nuts ... The rifle has an application, but not as a task. "tracer" once again showed his knowledge of knowledge of the charter. This fighter performs tasks cut by the commander using his weapons.
              Quote: tracer
              Therefore, this target has overall dimensions AT DIFFERENT distances.

              "tracer" do you talk about the overall dimensions of the targets? Especially about target number 25.
              1. tracer April 17 2020 07: 30 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                And "magnetic", do you criticize me. A lover of magnets on SCS, huh? That is OK. I took white tablets today? For a long time you haven’t. Does the virus scare you away? Don’t be afraid the site is not contagious, although you can not remove the mask out of habit. You have not been forgotten, do not bother ...))) You are so funny ...
                1. Timeout April 17 2020 13: 41 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: tracer
                  And "magnetic", do you criticize me.

                  Is that criticism? This is the regular poking of a sniper baker in his own feces.
                  Quote: tracer
                  I took white tablets today?
                  And why do you look like you, apparently you are constantly under drugs.
                  Quote: tracer
                  You are so funny ...

                  In what ... And I thought who served in the army, he does not laugh at the circus.
                  1. tracer April 17 2020 19: 03 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    Who told you that you need to criticize. You have to laugh at yourself. Sin cannot be laugh at. But there is nothing I can do about it. You understand the "magnetic" you can be diagnosed. To argue with your category is useless and counterproductive. How to explain the law of thermodynamics to Papuans. No one will argue with you. Get used to it. If you run after me like a mongrel, get that attitude too.
                    1. Timeout April 18 2020 01: 46 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Quote: tracer
                      Who told you that you need to criticize.

                      Quote: tracer
                      And "magnetic", do you criticize me.

                      Another attempt to roll over, or memory like a navaga? Strong!
                      Quote: tracer
                      You have to laugh at yourself.

                      Why do you have to laugh at yourself? Nature has grinned at you not so badly.
                      Quote: tracer
                      You understand the "magnetic" you can be diagnosed.

                      Another little thing? Then I watch your walkers still cannot reach me.
                      Quote: tracer
                      To argue with your category is useless and counterproductive.

                      What words we spied! Of course it’s not worth it, because you can’t argue against facts.
                      Quote: tracer
                      No one will argue with you.

                      Now what is happening, and 100 comments before that?
                      Quote: tracer
                      If you run after me like a mongrel, get that attitude too.

                      Run after you, do not respect yourself. Or because of you do not read the article? So you look like a named animal, barking, grinning, and there are no attempts to bite, except for excuses and empty comments. Manecha of greatness, our everything!
                      1. tracer April 18 2020 04: 03 New
                        • 0
                        • 3
                        -3
                        Does the magnetic hat filled do not bother you? Well, you think so. This is a clown hat no more. But you don’t notice it. Do not behave rudely and do not have to rake. However, you love it, you like it. You’ll even like ram to write nasty things until you’ve made a mistake at the “new gate”. It’s disgusting to many people to talk about dirty tricks because of you. A hype lover is inadequate. Verbal duel with you to behave disrespect.
                      2. Timeout April 18 2020 05: 27 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: tracer
                        Does the magnetic hat filled do not bother you?

                        ??. An interesting passage ... Is it a twist of your antilogic or ordinary illiteracy?
                        Quote: tracer
                        It’s disgusting to many people to talk about dirty tricks because of you.

                        Announce the entire list of many.
                        Quote: tracer
                        Verbal duel with you to behave disrespect.

                        Do not need. How can a door mat be respected? Either their feet will be wiped out, or the neighbor's cat will pile on.
    2. Ingenegr April 15 2020 21: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      If the only evaluation criterion is only the accuracy of the shooting, then it is certain. Only to realize this advantage, the cartridges need appropriate quality and cost.
      For example, the accuracy of firing WOLF with a 150-grain bullet from the TRG-22 at 300 m is on average worse than that from the SVD with 7N14 cartridges. This is verified. Cartridge prices are comparable.
      But Norma DL at a shot price 6 times higher (in 2011 prices) flew 3 ... 4 times more hefty.