Commander of the Navy spoke about the future of the fleet

30
Shortly before naval day fleet A press conference was held with the commander in chief of this type of troops. Vice Admiral V. Chirkov spoke about the successes achieved, about the plans of the command and the prospects for the development of the Russian Navy. Among other things, some of his statements clarified the situation with a number of programs that had previously been the subject of controversy. But first things first.

Regarding the short-term actions of the Russian warships, Chirkov said the following: when the current campaign of the combined group to the Mediterranean was planned, no one could tell what would be the situation in Syria. The fact is that this campaign was previously included in the combat training plan for 2012 year. Accordingly, all statements regarding Russia's intentions to scare Europe and America look like ridiculous speculation. Similarly, the situation is with the intended entry of the ship group in the port of Tartus. Ships of the Northern, Baltic and Black Sea fleets will not enter the Syrian territorial waters. At the same time, this does not mean Russia's refusal from the logistics base (MTO), located in Tartus. MTO base will continue to supply Russian ships with everything they need. The presence of such a facility is currently mainly due to the threat to shipping in the Gulf of Aden. It is convenient for Russian warships to enter Tartus to replenish their fuel and provisions and from there go to the patrol area.

With the provision of ships at a great distance from their native shores is connected another news. At present, during long trips to areas where there are no ITO bases, it is necessary to include in the composition of the ship groups the supply vessels, which carry the stock of everything necessary. With the presence of foreign MTO facilities, the issue of supplying ships becomes simpler. In addition, Chirkov said that maintaining a base abroad is cheaper than equipping and sending individual ships with the necessary cargo. It is obvious that with an increase in the number of patrols, the maintenance of the MTO bases will be even more profitable. Also, Vice-Admiral Chirkov mentioned that negotiations are underway regarding the re-establishment of Russian bases in Vietnam and Cuba. In addition, the location of another similar object can be Seychelles. Thus, in the area of ​​the pirate-dangerous Gulf of Aden there will be two logistic support bases at once.

“Indeed, we are continuing to work to ensure the deployment of naval forces outside the Russian Federation. As part of this work, the creation of logistics support points in Cuba, the Seychelles and Vietnam is being worked out at the international level,” he quotes. RIA News" Chirkova.


Media reports citing allegedly the statement of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy that Russia is negotiating the possibility of basing Navy ships abroad, does not correspond to reality

During the press conference of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, which took place on the eve of 26 July this year, this topic was not discussed and no official statements were made on this issue by the commander-in-chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral V. Chirkov.

Issues of interstate relations are not within the competence of the High Command of the Navy and, therefore, could not be provided to the media in any acceptable format.

The appearance of such information in the media is nothing more than a fantasy of its author, who preferred to put sensationalism at the head of his activities, rather than competence and professional ethics.

The full version of the video report on the press conference of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy

Office of the Press Service and Information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation


It is hardly possible to imagine overseas support bases that will remain idle for years. Plans to create such facilities should be supported by intentions for regular hikes. It seems that those will be. In any case, the figures of renewal of the material part of the Navy, voiced by the Commander-in-Chief, give hope for this. By the end of this year - for the remaining five months - 10-15 of ships of various classes and projects will be introduced into the Russian Navy. For comparison, the following should be said: since 2008, and up to the first half of the current 2012, inclusive, the Russian Navy has been supplemented by a dozen warships. Before 2008, the same amount was put into operation in several years. It seems that the State rearmament program before 2020 (GW-2020) really turned out to be the right step. General quantitative and qualitative plans for the construction and adoption of new equipment have been repeatedly voiced, so we’ll dwell only on those ships that will go to serve this year.

Nuclear submarine (nuclear submarine) "Yuri Dolgoruky"


Submarine "Severodvinsk" project 885 "Ash"


First of all, the first two nuclear submarines of the Borey 955 project should be noted. The head boat of the project "Yuri Dolgoruky" will be introduced into the fleet in the fall. A solemn ceremony in honor of the beginning of the service of “Alexander Nevsky” will take place a bit later. Next Monday, the 30 of July will mark the fourth submarine of the Borey project. The next item in the update program are multipurpose submarines. The Severodvinsk boat, the leading ship of the 885 Ash project, can also make it to service before the end of the current year. Finally, work continues on improving the 677 Lada project. In the near future, the lead diesel-electric submarine of the project called “Saint Petersburg” will become a platform for testing the latest design changes. The following diesel-electric submarines of the 677 project will be built according to the updated version of the technical documentation.

The pace of construction and commissioning of submarines can not but rejoice, but in the area of ​​surface ships, things are even better. According to Vice-Admiral Chirkov, by the end of July, the tests of the Dagestan patrol belonging to the 11661 project will be completed. Among other things, "Dagestan" is interesting in that it is the first domestic ship that is armed with the Kaliber-NK universal missile system. The characteristics of these missiles, namely, their range in 300 kilometers, allow the carrier ship to operate confidently throughout the entire Caspian Sea — Dagestan will serve in the Caspian Flotilla. In addition to the above-mentioned submarines and the outrigger, the plans for the end of the year include the commissioning of nine more surface ships and eight auxiliary vessels. This is the main frigate of the 22350 “Admiral Gorshkov” project, the 20380 corvettes, minesweepers, landing and anti-diversion boats, etc.

Commander of the Navy spoke about the future of the fleet
Watchdog "Dagestan"


More than ten surface ships, submarines and support vessels are currently in high readiness on the slipways of shipyards. At the same time, work to upgrade the material part of the fleet is not limited only to the construction of new ships. Several new projects are being developed. At a July 26 press conference, it was announced that the Ministry of Defense had found ways to finance the development of the look of a promising aircraft carrier. Preliminary documentation for the new project will be ready by the end of 2012, and construction will begin in a couple of years. Obviously, views on the allocation of funds were revised and previous statements regarding the construction of a new aircraft carrier after 2020 turned out to be erroneous. Until the time the Russian Navy receives a new aircraft carrier, the only representative of this class will undergo modernization. Currently, design work is underway to improve the electronic equipment and weapons of Admiral Kuznetsov. Details of the upgrade have not yet been announced, with the exception of the new aviation technicians. According to V. Chirkov, a new version of the MiG-33K will be added to Su-29 fighters.

Another project involves the creation of a new destroyer with a displacement of the order of 14 thousand tons. The technical side of the new destroyer is still classified information. However, the commander-in-chief of the fleet was encouraged by the public, saying that in the very near future the first information and approximate plans for construction would be published.

Simultaneously with the above-mentioned modernization of “Admiral Kuznetsov”, another similar program will be conducted. This time, the object of modernization will be heavy rocket cruisers of the 1144 "Orlan" project. The cruiser “Admiral Nakhimov” will be the first to go for repairs and improvements. This ship was incorporated into the Northern Fleet back in the 1988 year. After 11 years, he was sent for repairs, which, in fact, still lasts. Soon, the ship modernization project will be completed, during which it will receive new equipment and weapons. Five years have been allocated for all the work on updating Admiral Nakhimov. Regarding the two other cruisers of the 1144 project, the Kirov and Admiral Lazarev, the commander-in-chief of the Navy said nothing. It is worth noting that rumors have been circulating for several years about the planned modernization of these ships and returning to the fleets.

© RIA News, Infographics. Denis Kryukov


Simultaneously with the construction and modernization of large ships, the Navy will also lead to the modernization of infrastructure. According to Vice-Admiral Chirkov, in the near future a unified system of submarines and surface ships will be created in Primorye and on Kamchatka. Thus, two new amphibious ships of the Mistral project will serve in such improved conditions. A little later, the rest of the ports of the Navy will be modified accordingly. First of all, approaches to the piers will be deepened and moorings of sufficient length will be built. Thanks to these changes, any ship of the Russian Navy will be able to moor at any mooring wall and receive all the necessary cargoes, fuel, etc. Until now, some large ships, instead of mooring to the pier, are forced to stand on the barrels at a considerable distance from the coast. Convenience service and loading it clearly does not add.

Now one “transformation” of the structure of the Russian Navy is coming to an end: The headquarters of the fleet moves from Moscow to St. Petersburg. The transfer of the fleet command was begun five years ago, after which it went with varying success. Chirkov noted that the translation of the entire leadership of the Russian Navy will be completed at the end of this summer. The commander-in-chief of the fleet and a number of his colleagues have already moved to the Northern capital and are fully prepared for work. To ensure the living conditions of officers and admirals, the Navy Headquarters received more than a hundred apartments. Thanks to the translation of the Headquarters in St. Petersburg, all the leading organizations of the fleet and enterprises and the shipbuilding industry will be assembled. On the territory of one city-subject of the federation are actually the headquarters of the Navy, design offices "Malachite" and "Rubin", the company "Baltic Plant" and "Northern Shipyard", as well as the Naval Academy. Admiral Kuznetsov.

As we see, the development and renewal of the navy continues to gain momentum. A striking example of this is the pace of building new ships. The projects being developed are also encouraging. Naturally, with the continued construction and development of ships, with the modernization of infrastructure, etc. there will be problems. They must be overcome, otherwise the planned fleet renewal may be disrupted, which definitely will not benefit the sailors and the whole country.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. lotus04
    +16
    28 July 2012 07: 47
    Holiday greetings! MOREMANA!

    More to you the latest ships and 7 feet under the keel!
    1. +16
      28 July 2012 09: 34
      Quote: lotus04
      More to you the latest ships and 7 feet under the keel!

      Or so: 7 American aircraft carriers under the keel!
      1. -4
        28 July 2012 10: 32
        keel them all !!
      2. back
        -11
        28 July 2012 13: 47
        Dmitriy69,
        As I understand it, the Dagestan patrol boat will destroy all your 7 aircraft carriers? ...
        1. -4
          28 July 2012 19: 27
          He will destroy, and you doubt it? belay
    2. dreamer
      +4
      28 July 2012 11: 30
      Quote: lotus04
      More new ships for you

      And then we would read the news pleasing us, not Indians crying
      On Saturday, the MiG-29KUB ship fighter, intended for delivery to India, made the first landing on the deck of the Vikramaditya heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser which was called Admiral Gorshkov before modernization, a source in the military-industrial complex said.

      “The crew of the Heroes of Russia, honored test pilot Colonel Nikolai Dorditsa and test pilot of MiG Corporation Mikhail Belyaev, successfully landed on the deck of the aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov, a source from Interfax said.

      He noted that earlier pilots made several approaches over the ship at different heights, making touches of the deck of an aircraft carrier.

      1. Teploteh - nick
        +2
        28 July 2012 11: 49
        Quote: development and renewal of the navy continues to gain momentum Yes good
        Glory to Russia!!! drinks Glory to the Navy !!! drinks
        1. Nickname
          0
          29 July 2012 23: 21
          Well, here you need to pamper your beloved (we are alive and working, but ministers and presidents are still picking
  2. +2
    28 July 2012 07: 50
    A denial has already come about the Seychelles.

    Reports from a number of media outlets that Russia is allegedly negotiating the creation of naval bases abroad do not correspond to reality. This was reported to the Interfax agency at the Press Service and Information Department of the Russian Defense Ministry on Friday evening.
    At a press conference of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral Viktor Chirkov, the possibility of basing the ships of the Navy abroad was not discussed and no official statements on this subject were made, the press service of the military department explained.
    "Issues of interstate relations are not within the competence of the Main Command of the Navy and, therefore, could not be provided to the media in any acceptable format," the department said in a statement.
    The Defense Ministry stressed that the appearance of such information in the media is "nothing more than a fantasy of its author, who preferred to put sensationalism at the head of his activities rather than competence and professional ethics." The report on Chirkov's press conference is on the ministry's website, the press service recalled.

    Magazines again fantasized.
  3. panteon
    +4
    28 July 2012 07: 58
    WITH PROFESSIONAL HOLIDAY !!! Navy !!!
  4. Ilyich
    +8
    28 July 2012 08: 03
    Along with the above-mentioned modernization of Admiral Kuznetsov, another similar program will be held. This time the object of modernization will be the heavy missile cruisers of Project 1144 Orlan. The cruiser Admiral Nakhimov will be the first to repair and improve.

    This is the case! And then patrol boats and frigates are, of course, good, but only heavy cruisers can reduce the ambition of the "partners" aircraft carriers. And it would not hurt to add escort vessels. But about the construction of new BODs and destroyers, while something is not heard.
    1. Tirpitz
      -6
      28 July 2012 11: 23
      Quote: Ilyich
      but only heavy cruisers can reduce the ambition of the "partners" aircraft carriers.

      I put you - because I agree with a dream. In reality, in addition to aircraft carriers, it is not anyone who succumbed to fighting with the USAG. AUG air defense is difficult to break through, but it is not realistic to fend off airplanes.
      1. Vito
        +16
        28 July 2012 11: 37
        Tirpitz... Hello buddy! Nobody is talking about real fighting (God forbid). It's all about its presence, as one well-known proverb says, "it's enough just to be"; and whatever one may say but to reckon with this powerful (I'm not afraid of this word) unit of our fleet will have to all our "partners".
        I once watched a film about ships of this class (ORLAN), and so the captain of this cruiser shared his memories. When their ship in the Mediterranean approached Lebanese waters, all NATO and US ships firing at LEBANON left this water area for a range of 500 km, that is, to the ultimate shot of our GRANITE complex.
        Agree with me, it says a lot! drinks
        1. back
          -9
          28 July 2012 13: 48
          Vito
          and what does it mean?
          1. Vito
            +7
            28 July 2012 13: 55
            back,
            Quote: back
            and what does it mean?

            The fact that power is always respected!
            Read my comment again, everything in my opinion is clearly stated!
        2. iegudeil
          +1
          1 August 2012 02: 04
          I completely agree with you. Often, just the presence of a combat unit in a hot area is enough to cool all the fervor. When the boats of our division were on alert in the Mediterranean, all the enemy SSBNs were hiding in their bases. Naturally, in the case of military operations, shooting a base with all the ships there is not difficult.
      2. Ilyich
        0
        30 July 2012 00: 15
        Quote: Tirpitz
        In reality, in addition to aircraft carriers, it is not anyone who succumbed to fighting with the USAG. AUG air defense is difficult to break through, but it is not realistic to fend off airplanes.

        Perhaps ... My comment comes from that. that the cruisers of this project are called "aircraft carrier killers". Somewhere information slipped (and more than once) that the calculation during the confrontation between the cruiser "Orlan" and a separate AUG always came out in favor of the cruiser.
        The aircraft carrier, of course, goes with the group, but why did you decide that there will be one cruiser? If the task is to combat AUG, then the warrant is selected accordingly, right? Well, in theory, at least.
  5. MILITARY RF
    +2
    28 July 2012 10: 44
    HAPPY YOU SEAFARES
    1. +2
      28 July 2012 18: 08
      The military of the Russian Federation under the flag of Iceland ... making in three words 4 (four) grammatical errors ... If the main word is MILITARY, then definitely not the Russian Federation. If you take the Icelandic flag as the main one, you can forgive, but then what does the Russian Federation have to do with it?
  6. +11
    28 July 2012 11: 55
    Navy happy holiday !!!
    But the article is complete nonsense. Of course it’s good that new ships arrive at the Navy. But look coca PR around one corvette. A beautiful table does not stand up to any criticism at all. From where are 5 boats of project 667BRD to the Pacific Fleet and an unclear amount to the Northern Fleet. There are only 3 of them all in the Pacific Fleet. And on SF 8 BRDM they built only 7 of them, one on conversion to a special purpose boat and is not an SSBN. Where are the project 20380 corvettes on the BF, and there are two of them in service with the b / n 530, 531., etc.
    In general, another article from the series "Don't worry, we have not cut everything yet. We are fine."
    Now, if they adopted 10-15 ships of the 1st and 2nd rank in a year, I would applaud while standing and be sure that my sleep is well guarded and the government does not sleep at night thinking how it would be even more effective to conduct military reform. And so there are 2-3 nuclear submarines that have been building for 6-12 years each and one ship of the 2nd rank + boats which in my time and for ships they didn’t count and the plants handed over a pack a year.
    Now you can put cons for not patriotic statements
    1. Vito
      +5
      28 July 2012 12: 05
      skiff-xnumxHello, no matter how regrettable, but I have to agree with you! So far, we are talking about units. It is necessary to increase the pace, but still I want to note the positive changes. It takes so many years to disintegrate such power, and then, of course, it is not possible to restore at least those similar in terms of tonnage and pace of construction with the SOVIET period!
      As the saying goes "Do not break, do not need mind"!
      1. +8
        28 July 2012 13: 31
        As the saying goes, "If there is a desire, there are 1000 opportunities, and if there is no desire, there are 1000 excuses." I believe that if there is political will, the pace of building the fleet can be accelerated significantly. Let's take a look at the situation in our fleet. Of course, hypothetically. Until 2020, the boats of the 667BRD project will be decommissioned, the decommissioning of the boats of the 667BRDM project will begin, the life cycle is coming to an end even if we take into account that they were at the pier in the 90s, but here the situation is normal, they will gradually be replaced by the project 955 Borey, and the waters with multipurpose boats not so all the rosy head boats of projects 971 and 949A have already been written off, which means that soon there will be a massive write-off of 20 years, I think they will write off everything. And they propose to replace it with 8 "Ash" with a minimum quantity of 30 pcs. I don't even want to talk about surface ships 20 corvettes and 10-12 frigates. A drop in the sea. And if you take into account that they are being built for 6 years and are not laid every year, then when the last ship of the series is built, the first two will already be written off. As for the "Orlans", most likely only two "Peter 1" and "Admiral Nakhimov" are being modernized. Kirov has a serious breakdown of the turbo-gear unit and modernization is possible only with a serious disassembly of the hull, and there is nowhere to repair the Admiral Lazarev at the Pacific Fleet and it does not seem that it is being prepared for towing to the Northern Fleet. And see, soon our surface forces will exhaust their resource and we will be left without an ocean-going fleet.
        With regard to the construction of ships. A truly grandiose construction of ships of 1-2 ranks can be deployed in the Baltic. If Severnaya Verf is already driving tenants away, then Baltiyskiy Zavod is not even connected to the state defense order, but see it built Orlans and there are people and capacities. Transfer corvettes to Amber and let these two factories build destroyer frigates. On TO, you can also start building frigates and destroyers, and most importantly boats. But what turns out to be 30 years has been built and now not because the depths are not the same in the fairway. Let the boats of the 10 project be built for at least 855 years, but they lay it down every year and the situation can be radically changed. So you can do anything you wish
        1. Rockets
          +3
          28 July 2012 14: 21
          Quote: skiff-1980
          I believe that with the political will, the pace of the construction of the fleet can be accelerated several times

          Due to what? Where is the money zing?
          All shipyards underwent democratic modernization in the 90s and only one crumbs remained from the shipyards. They simply are not able to produce more, even if you allocate money for it. At the northern shipyard they managed to sell the only floating dock in private hands, and now they pay money for its rent. I’m silent about the slipway.
          It is necessary to accelerate the infrastructure of shipyards and only then can we talk about the growth of shipbuilding ...
          1. +2
            28 July 2012 14: 33
            Well, you've been to these shipyards. That sold the dock is true. Where to expand is there. The slipways are owned by the enterprise, are rented out and are empty. Outfitting walls too. That's what I'm talking about. "There would be a desire"
            1. Rockets
              +7
              28 July 2012 14: 55
              Quote: skiff-1980
              The stocks in the ownership of the enterprise are leased and empty.


              2 slipways? how many to 90-2000 before cutting the plant? The side berth was completely killed. Stapeli essentially need to build new ones. Gas, electric oxygen, overpasses, overhaul necessary.
              1. +1
                28 July 2012 15: 05
                I agree. Many just killed. But you can restore. Moreover, the modernization period is only 18 months if you are talking about the Baltic Shipyard and the price is 42 million rubles. It would be a desire
                1. Rockets
                  +3
                  28 July 2012 15: 12
                  If everything is done correctly and without losses (which I strongly doubt, how can we do without cutting the "attendants" ?! ^^) then God forbid, if we reach the Soviet level of production, in 10 years
                  1. +3
                    28 July 2012 15: 26
                    And no one talks about the level of the USSR in the production of military equipment. The economy was militarized, but now it is not acceptable. Yes, and Nikolaev will not be returned. We are talking about increasing the pace of production due to the resources saved so far to the level of equivalent replacement of ships in service with a delta of 5-6% percent, followed by an increase in this delta due to the modernization of production and increasing the production base.
                  2. 77bor1973
                    0
                    28 July 2012 21: 55
                    Nonsense, everything works, everything functions, even two shipyards are built at the expense of USC and not the state!
                    1. 0
                      28 July 2012 22: 24
                      United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) OJSC is a Russian state shipbuilding holding. The owner of a 100% stake in the company is the Russian Federation. So the state turns out to be building. And where do these shipyards build do not tell.
          2. Rider
            +3
            28 July 2012 15: 47
            Quote: Rockets
            All shipyards underwent democratic modernization in the 90s and only one crumbs remained from the shipyards.


            And what do you remember about the 90s ??
            Putin has been in power for 12 years, but nothing has been done
            1. Rockets
              0
              29 July 2012 01: 07
              Quote: Ryder
              And what do you remember about the 90s ??
              Putin has been in power for 12 years, but nothing has been done


              Order to take the property from private owners from LLC AOO, etc.?
              Or do you hope that they themselves will give?
              Well, they don’t take us away, first give it to privatize, and then take it away from us in our own way. And again, the GDP will be to blame, because you want this?
              1. Rider
                +1
                29 July 2012 01: 24
                Quote: Rockets
                Order to take the property from private owners from LLC AOO, etc.?
                Or do you hope that they themselves will give?


                The problem is not the owners of the shipyards, but the lack of orders from the state
                In the end, property can always be taken away - as cleverly done with Yukos or the creation of state corporations.

                Those. a lot of options for improving the situation, but nothing has been done in 12 years. Except for the patrol boat "Dagestan". laughing
                1. Docker76
                  0
                  29 July 2012 11: 09
                  Quote: Ryder
                  property can always be taken away


                  ... please note, no one was taken away from anyone .......
                  ... redeemed at market value, though without consent ..... tongue
            2. Nickname
              0
              29 July 2012 23: 54
              So they Navalny with Sobchak interfere with industry and grain yields
              lift up
    2. Nickname
      0
      29 July 2012 23: 16
      Skiff, I think everyone will agree
      But, do we still exist (I speak Russian and sn is not in bucks)?
      So we should have a child prodigy that covers all aircraft carriers at once?
      Or the aliens promised support, but if not, then it’s very sad and everyone (pu, me and serdyuk) must go into a corner and shoot himself
  7. 0
    28 July 2012 12: 27
    With the aircraft carriers, a bummer comes out, and about Mistral he somehow suspiciously kept silent.
  8. Alx1miK
    +2
    28 July 2012 16: 13
    Build a nuclear submarine and name it "Kuzkina Mother". Let the amers shake.
    1. Shulz-1955
      +1
      29 July 2012 00: 26
      Well, or at least "YO MYO"
  9. +1
    29 July 2012 00: 51
    Hmm. I would like to see an article or a detailed commentary about the state of our shipbuilding industry ... And then in our city, instead of shipbuilding plants, in Vladik, we have warehouses and shopping centers. They closed the dalzav, 178 are going to close it and make a recreation park. 92 is so old that there is nothing to say. Only the fishing and auxiliary fleet are going to build now. Only there is no one to work at the factory. In bargaining, it’s more profitable for now, at our prices.
    1. 0
      29 July 2012 08: 37
      Yes, the state of shipbuilding in the Far East is depressing. In other places it’s much better, although not a fountain either. If it is interesting, In his comments to this and other articles, he conducted an analysis of the status of some shipyards. Look, it might be interesting.
  10. Karmin
    0
    29 July 2012 01: 19
    Quote: Rockets
    Commander of the Navy spoke about the future of the fleet
    Watchdog "Dagestan"

    Not ,, Dagestan ,,, but ,, Tatarstan ,,
  11. Karmin
    -1
    29 July 2012 01: 21
    The photograph does not depict ,, Dagestan ,, but ,, Tatarstan ,,
  12. bremest
    +1
    29 July 2012 14: 28
    Congratulations to all fellow citizens on the day of the Russian Navy !!!! Glory to the Russian Navy!
  13. bremest
    +1
    29 July 2012 17: 11
    ONCE AGAIN WITH THE DAY OF THE Navy OF RUSSIA!
    Channel Star made a gift, live broadcast from Sevastopol! HOORAY !
    Gift to all!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh1gNbdJVrQ&feature=related
  14. +1
    29 July 2012 19: 01
    a good picture of the fleets, but it seems there are a lot of things that are not in the service, but are in conservation (or storage), such as cruiser 941 project 2 pieces. 10-15 ships a year is good, even every year, yes, excluding boats and minesweepers

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"