On the grave crisis in contemporary Russian war cinema


The 75th anniversary of the Great Victory of the Soviet people over fascism in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 is coming soon. There is no doubt that on the eve of the holiday we are expecting the premieres of new films and series dedicated to historical date. But you don’t feel any joy from this, but you expect new disappointments and mass indignation of the audience.


It's a strange thing, you look at the Soviet “At war as at war”, “Only old people go into battle” or “Baltic sky” and you believe in what is happening on the screen. And not just believe, but live along with the characters on the screen. And after watching the modern "Fighters", "Tanks"," T-34 "or" Indestructible "the soul remains a dirty feeling, as if in it, this very soul, screenwriters, directors, cameramen and actors spat in the most mocking way ...

It is even more strange that viewing, for example, foreign and modern "Pearl Harbor", "Midway", "Pacific Ocean" or "Brothers in arms"Evokes the same feeling of truthfulness shown on the screen, although you know for sure that a lot of them are either greatly embellished, or even a direct lie ...

The sense of objectivity in such films is caused by the details: for example, in the Pacific Ocean, one of the American heroes after the battle is amused by the fact that ... he throws stones at the half-demolished head of a dead Japanese soldier, frozen at the moment of death behind a machine gun. And besides, he rips out golden teeth from dead Japanese soldiers.


And in Brothers in Arms, an American soldier wears a whole bunch of watches on his wrist, taken from killed Germans.

In "Fury" the crew of one American "Sherman" fights off entire hordes of SS men, not forgetting to have some fun with German women, who then die during the shelling. And the youngest and inexperienced tanker is forced to shoot the prisoner ... He does it.

And even after 75 years, but this movie portrays the enemy as the enemy, and his soldier as the hero.


In modern Russian military films, with the possible exception of a few (“28 Panfilovites” or “Brest Fortress”), there is no truth about that great war. They actually do not answer the question that torments us more and more after years: WHY AND HOW WE STAND, WHY WIN?

Modern Russian military films interpret the great past as follows: yes, they won, but they did it almost by accident, and ... contrary to all commanders and commanders, starting from the company commander and ending with the Supreme Commander-in-Chief Stalin.

Such a surreal, treacherous, fictional idea has been created and continues to be planted, destroying the connection between generations and the foundations of modern society.


It will not be about the details over which the audience, who at least have some understanding of military affairs, are already tired of laughing: inconsistencies in the form of clothing and insignia, military equipment to the historical truth, explosions from 82 mm caliber mines, from which it dies with each break almost a company, girls snipers painted around the clock, and other "mistakes", of which there are so many ...

It will be about the concept that has been driven into the heads of Russian citizens for many years with the help of these “movie-making” created with funds from the Russian budget. And that means our money: after all, in the credits in the overwhelming majority of films about the Great Patriotic War it is indicated everywhere that this or that cinema opus was created with the support of, for example, the Russian Ministry of Culture, the “Cinema Fund”, etc.

What does the viewer see in such films? Politruk, an idiot, a sadist counterintelligence agent and necessarily a character who has served a certain number of years, of course, “for no reason”, in the camps. Well, another stupid colonel or general, manically sending subordinates to slaughter.



Anyone who personally communicated with the front-line soldiers, and perhaps even managed to fight in subsequent wars, knows very well that in fact such chances for political commanders or Smershovites to survive or at least remain on the front lines would not exist ...

Accidental shrapnel or a bullet that arrived “from nowhere” would have ended such a “career” very soon ... And, as the front-line soldiers themselves said, higher commanders simply removed these “commanders” from sin immediately when an unhealthy situation arose in the front-line units.

War always carries out its own natural selection.


And yet: during the years of World War II, about 35 million people passed through the active Red Army. If you compare this number with the number of even all prisoners in the same period, it is obvious that if the former ZK got into operation, then there was a completely insignificant number of them.


Or, perhaps, the officials of the Ministry of Culture, as well as the producers, together with the directors and scriptwriters, were all sitting on their own? And now their memories of this unforgettable period of their lives are transferred to the screen? But this is unlikely ...

Does all this say that political idiots, mortalists, sadists and convicts were not at the forefront?


Of course no. They had a place to be. But this was not a mass phenomenon. More precisely, it was a single occurrence, otherwise it simply would not have been a victory, because it is impossible to win such a war with stupid generals and colonels, lieutenants and captains, political officers, goats and counterintelligence-paskuda. Well, there were no such precedents in the history of military art ...

Much more, by orders of magnitude, there were cases when political officers or military counterintelligence, when the commander died, took command. But about this in modern Russian military films there is not a word, not a word ...

As there are no films about real heroes, and not about characters composed in fever delirium who allegedly fought.

For example, Sergeant Sirotinin or Private Perederius, who were left alone with their guns to cover the retreating comrades, one in Belarus and the second in Krasnodar ... Or the pilot Mamkin, who took the P-5 enemy 13 out of the enemy’s fire, burnt out of the fire (! ) children from the enemy rear who landed the plane on the airfield and died of burns in a week ...

On the grave crisis in contemporary Russian war cinema

There are thousands and thousands of such examples of mass heroism, but there are no films about them ...

So who installed this “filter” for modern “film works” about the Great Patriotic War? And who allocates money for this vile lie? Addresses, surnames, appearances? And why repeat it from film to film?

Separately about the enemies. The very Nazis who killed, raped, killed and sent to death in a concentration camp about 15 million civilians of the Soviet Union.


In today's Russian war cinema, they almost always appear ironed, glazed, elegant characters, fighting the Soviet "cattle" aristocratic and even intelligent ...


The enemy is the enemy. Hollywood gives the right to a foreign audience to consider fascists as enemies, and domestic apprentices from the cinema do not give such a right to the descendants of the winners !!!

They sincerely wanted these individuals with a swastika to free the unfortunate Russians from the Bolshevik concentration camp, but the saduk political officers, NKVD detachment detachments, and personally the maniac Stalin filled up the unfortunate Europeans with corpses and did not allow “to bring the light of freedom to Soviet soil”.

Even beautiful actors, playing in these lying movie opuses, know very well that they are participating in grandiose cinema. And therefore, we see not the human characters of the heroes, but miserable walking stereotypes, stamped with a carbon copy and having nothing to do with the historical truth about the war. Well, you can’t make a real talent play sincerely even for the biggest money!

Konstantin Stanislavsky in such cases angrily exclaimed “I do not believe!” Having watched at least one (one!) Contemporary Russian war film, he probably would not have found censored expressions ...

Good gentlemen, filmmakers of all stripes and officials involved in these acts! Why are you faking the truth about the war? Why, after 75 years, are you repeating fabrications again and again? Who or what makes you do it?
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

279 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. DMB 75 April 14 2020 05: 18 New
    • 86
    • 3
    +83
    - Do not watch modern war films!
    “But there are no others?”
    - Here are no and do not look.
    Look Soviet. You don’t know about the current ones, either laughing, crying, or launching something on the TV.
    1. Grandfather April 14 2020 05: 26 New
      • 35
      • 5
      +30
      The 75th anniversary of the Great Victory of the Soviet people over fascism in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 is coming soon. There is no doubt that on the eve of the holiday we are expecting the premieres of new films and series dedicated to the historical date.
      There is no doubt that we will again include American Hollywood handicrafts. I’m ready to bet that it’s so. it’s so tolerant, at first to show the Victory Parade, and then “ordinary Ryan”. this is the whole current system.
      1. The leader of the Redskins April 14 2020 06: 43 New
        • 24
        • 13
        +11
        Is not a fact. I noticed that in recent years, right in time for the Victory Day, our Kololyut began to spit “miscarriages” on the topic of war. Cheap filmetsy miniseries, even the names of which you can not remember. Just the plot and the play of the actors - Kaka!
        Here is the "Rzhev" came out. I read the story. The first half - everything is according to the book, and then ... They hooked, smoothed and screwed up.
        According to the book of the special police officer, they just shot them in the back, and the battalion commander in the last attack drove the remains of the company drunk ...
        But the director decided not to “dirty” the truth with the script and the Germans killed the special agent, and the battalion commander explained to the company for a long time that a large offensive at the front depends on his attack ....
        1. Bashkirkhan April 14 2020 08: 29 New
          • 10
          • 4
          +6
          I think these pseudo films about the Second World War need to be treated with indifference, and not get on your nerves. Recently in Kaluga during a distance lesson on the basics of Orthodox culture on one of the platforms, fifth-graders were shown a pornographic video. So, here are modern films about the war are the same pornographic videos that can be watched with beer and popcorn. Society has degraded, so such films correspond to its needs.
          1. I do not want to agree with you, dear Bashkirkhan! ,, Indifferent, to the villains is not necessary. Neatly, putting in place, as the author of the article did, is another matter. Otherwise, ordinary nonhumans will think that PEOPLE are over. And it will be more convenient to settle on the neck of the obedient, homo sapiens,. With ,, pivas and popcorn ,, in your hands.
            ,, Society has degraded ,,? It has been gradually degrading for thousands of years. But everyone should do his own thing. Servants of Darkness - dirty tricks, people serving Goodness should strive to relieve dirty tricks
        2. Varyag_0711 April 14 2020 08: 35 New
          • 50
          • 12
          +38
          Chief of the Redskins (Nazarius)
          According to the book of the special police officer, they just shot them in the back, and the battalion commander in the last attack drove the remains of the company drunk ...
          So maybe the book is shit? I am not saying that such a case did not exist at all, but this is the ONLY case. And it is this particular case that is introduced as something taken for granted, as ordinary. And then modern youth, with brainwashed by the Unified State Examination, and not only youth, with foam at the mouth begins to prove that it was so. Once I almost fell into the sediment when a friend of mine (not a dumb woman in life) after watching the movie “Bastards” with an aplomb of a connoisseur stated that they say what sadists were in the USSR, poor street children were forced to die. And this is an adult lady, who studied at the Soviet school, and what can we say about youth?
          In general, about this one:
          Good gentlemen, filmmakers of all stripes and officials involved in these acts! Why are you faking the truth about the war? Why, after 75 years, are you repeating fabrications again and again? Who or what makes you do it?
          I want to say that both filmmakers and officials fulfill a very specific task of the country's leadership in denigrating our glorious Soviet past. This is the focused policy of our modern state! Our state is afraid that the people will finally remember what successes they achieved under the Soviet system and what these successes turned into under the modern management system. So they pour tons of dirt, because they understand that they are less than microbes compared to Stalin. That's why they shamefully drape the Mausoleum, at the foot of which the flags of the defeated Reich were thrown. That's why they hang tablets on the killers in the city, which suffered from these killers. Therefore, monuments to the Nazis in Rossosh put.
          But at the same time, we are intensely distracted, and look what they are doing with the monuments in Ukraine and what they are doing in Europe with them. Yes, you look at yourself that you are in your own country with your own story create tricks.

          P.S. We are preparing for the 75th anniversary, watching old Soviet cinema, and we are not ill for all enemies of evil!
          1. iouris April 14 2020 10: 34 New
            • 9
            • 1
            +8
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            I think these pseudo films about WWII need to be treated indifferently

            No, comrade! Against this anti-people’s art, it is necessary to carry out counter-propaganda, to identify the true customers of each such “cultural product”. Those. you need to have an alternative ideology and apparatus, including critics.
            Fear the indifferent: crimes are committed with their tacit consent.
            “In the impoverished and illiterate Russia, cinema is the most important art!” Because it systematically destroys the spiritual connection of generations.
            1. Varyag_0711 April 14 2020 10: 45 New
              • 10
              • 5
              +5
              Sorry, but I have this
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              I think these pseudo films about WWII need to be treated indifferently
              did not write. This was written by the commentator above under the nickname Bashkirkhan. I’m just for trampling all this anti-Soviet rot and propaganda in the bud. So your comment is not at the address.
              1. iouris April 14 2020 11: 01 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Please accept my deepest apologies for the carelessness. In my defense, I can note that a quote from the "source" is available.
              2. novel66 April 14 2020 12: 00 New
                • 9
                • 1
                +8
                to condemn bastard directors and scriptwriters, and beat them affordably - this is their only weak point
            2. Bashkirkhan April 14 2020 11: 26 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: iouris
              Those. you need to have an alternative ideology and apparatus, including critics.

              Representatives of an alternative ideology will soon leave for a different world, and the new generation brought up on the films “Bastards” and “Shtrafbat” and not reading books all this is no longer interesting. For them, the Second World War is about the same as the Battle of Kulikovo. I read like that work "Shadows in Paradise" by Erich Maria Remarque. Actions take place at the end of the war. The protagonist Robert is forced to flee Nazi Germany and emigrate to the United States. Robert explains the crew of the Hollywood mentality of the Germans. What do those who kill in concentration camps look like every day? Not beasts, with a wry face twisted, as the directors thought. But honestly, scrupulously, with all responsibility, not forgetting to carefully fill out the reports, they carry out the tasks of their bosses without feeling guilty, but rather, being proud of a job well done. Just as before, they tried and were proud, working as accountants. "I explained to him that the largest industrial concerns in the country entered into agreements with concentration camps to supply cheap labor, that is, simply slaves who worked until they lost their ability to work, and then their ashes with smoke flew out of the crematorium chimney." What the director told Robert that the audience would not believe him and the film would not be a commercial success. Since Hollywood makes superficial films and the director just wants to make money.
          2. Avior April 14 2020 11: 03 New
            • 16
            • 0
            +16
            So maybe the book is shit? I am not saying that such a case did not exist at all, but this is the ONLY case.

            It’s more difficult with the book, the author is a front-line soldier who fought under Rzhev, a WWII disabled person. And, judging by the award sheet, he fought well.
            https://pamyat-naroda.ru/heroes/podvig-chelovek_nagrazhdenie10516377/

            I think they’re giving me a nudge now, and to hell with him, I can’t keep silent.
            I think that it’s better not to touch the book and the author.
            This is his personal look. Single case? It is possible, I even agree with you, only the author came across this isolated case, it turns out, since he has this left. Couldn’t it be like that?
            It is no good now for a front-line soldier, who has long been dead, to indicate that he wrote something about the front, he cannot answer. He didn’t expect this from his descendants when, near a village near Rzhev, a sergeant raised a company under heavy fire under machine guns and mortars instead of the deceased commander shouting “Destroy the fascist reptile, forward to the enemy!”. He could be mistaken, or take things differently over the years, in black colors, and we may disagree with him three times, and we will be right, and we are not obliged to agree with him, but he deserved his right to make mistakes and his errors there, near the village of Ovsyannikovo, April 7, 1942, under fire on the battlefield.

            But there is another side to the issue.
            After all, no one forced him to make films according to his book. This is a completely different matter
            There are a lot of memoirs and art books of authors - war veterans, I think it’s the authors of the film and I need to ask why they decided to shoot an isolated case, what determined the choice of this book?
            But the authors of the film already have a lot of questions on this part ....
            Well, let's minus now .....
            hi
            1. Varyag_0711 April 14 2020 12: 30 New
              • 10
              • 6
              +4
              Well, why immediately minus? Plus to you from me! hi In fact, you are right and I do not argue with you. In war, as in war, everything happened. Only now it really raises the question, why was this particular product chosen? Why are negative moments chosen? Why do we consciously pour on the head the ears of that trench truth (here without irony) that accompanies any war?
              The feat itself is being washed away, and consciously being washed away, by this very trench truth. You see, that’s the thing. If you show one chernukha and the trench truth, then you will not educate any heroes on this truth, but you will educate the generation a la "but I need it so much happiness, I won’t go to war, let the others go."
              My grandfather went through more than one war, but I never heard anything negative from him. NEVER he talked about the war, as about something terrible, but in fact he had this and was abundant. He even spoke about the terrible start of the war and the retreat from Belarus. And every year he was invited to our school to tell us about the war before May 9th. He probably perfectly understood and realized that we did not need all that terrible truth about the war.
            2. NordUral April 14 2020 14: 37 New
              • 6
              • 1
              +5
              Why minus? Everything was in that war. Only here are the current activities from the cinema and not only, they are looking for only the bad. And "our" power pays for it.
          3. Dwellernet April 16 2020 13: 45 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            I will subscribe for every word!
          4. Aborigen4ik April 17 2020 05: 51 New
            • 1
            • 6
            -5
            With the Mausoleum drapery, people like you, as usual, go too far ... Our grandfathers threw banners at the foot of the Mausoleum, not to please Blanca-Ulyanov-Lenin, but at the feet of the Supreme Commander. Stalin I.V. So, at least my grandfather told me ... The parade took place with the mausoleum at the platform full and it was repeatedly explained to neo-comics that the passage of troops, giving military greetings to the current leadership of the country standing on the platform on such significant days, looks ridiculous and inappropriate ... Moreover, Ilyich, by no means, had anything to do with that war, so that the best units near his crypt would go on combatant step. But it still doesn’t reach the pseudo-red ones, they just do what they ask, why are they drapping ?. Why don’t you ... whine about drapery, but demand the inscription of the Mausoleum- "Lenin.Stalin" to start returning, then at least some sense appears in the draped whining ...
        3. tatarin1972 April 15 2020 12: 15 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          You know, this was not only written in books, but it really was. My grandfather went through the whole war as a part of 359 OPR, 2722 SD of the Karelian Front. In August 1942, his group withdrew from the rear of the Finnish front-line scouts, who later became Heroes of the Soviet Union, both posthumously. So when crossing the front line, or rather, when crossing the Svir River, one of the girls was shot by our machine gun crew, and there was a drunken political instructor behind the machine gun. Grandfather shot the political instructor, they didn’t give him a tower, they gave him 3 months of a free company, and the whole group.
        4. Sergey Zhikharev April 15 2020 14: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          If the last year is 10 years, then yes.
          "Serving the Soviet Union" - in 2012. "
          "Documentary investigation" by Suvorov-Rezun exactly on June 22, 2011 (or 2012)
      2. Svarog April 14 2020 07: 49 New
        • 18
        • 3
        +15
        Quote: Dead Day
        there is no doubt that we will again include American hollywood

        I can’t watch American films about the Second World War .. As Stanislavsky said, “I don’t believe”
        But domestic modern ones do not really shine. You can count good films on the fingers of one hand ..
        For me, a good film is when you watch several times and after a while, still ready to watch ..
        1. Tavrik April 14 2020 16: 36 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Are there American films about the Great Patriotic War ?? Thought only about the second world .. Sealed up?
          See the good old McHaley Fleet. They knew how to set before ..
          1. Alf
            Alf April 14 2020 20: 23 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: Tavrik
            Are there American films about the Great Patriotic War ??

            There is. A wonderful series called the Unknown War. That's just a hassle in the fact that he is the 1975 edition.
          2. The leader of the Redskins April 15 2020 12: 22 New
            • 1
            • 5
            -4
            "Enemy at the gate."
          3. Darter88 April 18 2020 12: 12 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            “Enemy at the Gates,” about sniper Vasily Zaitsev, a decent movie without pathos!
      3. Doccor18 April 14 2020 09: 38 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        You're right. It is impossible to have a good cinema when half the people under 30 do not know the history of their native country.
        When millions go on
        "The best movie" in theaters. This is degeneration of art.
        The last more or less worthy film that I saw
        "9 Rota". Not without mistakes, but decently removed.
        Then the abyss ...
        1. begemot20091 April 14 2020 10: 18 New
          • 13
          • 1
          +12
          Here is a really complete shit Bondarchuk. Better Thunderstorm Gate. Bondarchuk’s roof was generally torn down. "Stalingrad" - that’s ... e. And “Sniper”, “Penalties” ... were shot in a drunken stupor? And consultants must take boys like Kolya from Urengoy.
          1. Fan-fan April 14 2020 22: 22 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            It's simple, in Soviet times there was a hudsovet, which everyone scolded, but this hudsovet did not miss the obvious bullshit, filtered. And now there is some kind of filter, no, that’s what they’re driving false and mediocre films.
      4. boni592807 April 14 2020 21: 27 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        They do not wait on May 9th. Now, to whom self-isolation, to whom quarantine. What’s the TV people “twisting” the people, with a scanty exception (mainly the “Zvezda” channel), again for the “staff” they save the WORLD on super starships and THEIR super technics “Unattainable” is some kind of RF, but it’s harsh, but “ skillful "REMBO (played by Stalone, who has turned down his service from his homeland) mows the" Bad "Russians (Soviet) in Afghanistan, saving the ancient" civilization "! It’s the US’s job to reshoot the continuation, as Rembo, having made an old age (played by the same stalon) now helping the same Afghans, is fighting with the American rangers in Afghanistan. For sclerosis, taking them for Soviet soldiers. I am sure success will be.
        Already their naphthalene nonsense, not everyone in the US is watching. And we have TVs for our bored children (grandchildren) about us and about Russia. What to be surprised, if to say to young growth and NOT only, instead of Russia, for example Raska. Here is "Khuta thent aghesively sown by menachers .." How many there are good Soviet films, popular science including According to the school program, it was not only literature, physics, etc. hi
      5. Pilat2009 April 15 2020 09: 21 New
        • 0
        • 4
        -4
        That you t-34 and the Indestructible attacked. It is possible to see once. The same Midway shot somehow against the backdrop of the film Torah. Torah. Torah. And 28 Panfilov’s men are generally a normal film. I remember back in the 70s I watched a movie so even modern tanks calmly appeared there
    2. mmaxx April 14 2020 06: 01 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      I do not like this character - Professor Preobrazhensky. But with such an interpretation of his words I agree to 100.
    3. Pravodel April 14 2020 07: 33 New
      • 22
      • 4
      +18
      I am joining. Watch old Soviet films in which the truth about the war is really the truth, and not the fiction of the director or screenwriter.
      Example: in one of the series about partisans, the radio operator falls in love with a captured fascist and goes to the city to meet with this fascist when he escapes from the detachment. Brad, which is even impossible to imagine drunk. And such in modern films, darkness, darkness, and again darkness.
      What is the reason? In the filthy unloved by the liberalists Union, scoop films were created by artists for whom art was art and not earning money. Now the opposite is true: there is no art without dough. Everything that is done, which is put on by modern directors, is written by modern scriptwriters - this is handicraft, the purpose of which is to earn dough, to chop the dough. Under these conditions, there’s no need to talk about any art. And the truth of life, so do not care about it at all. The main thing is that the loot fell, even better in green candy wrappers when selling fakes for art to the west. Who will buy and watch in the West if there are no bloody commissars tearing up the stomachs of pregnant women, there are no sadists of NKV despots, KGB officers mocking soldiers, prisoners, residents, there are no ghouls of commanders sending soldiers to machine-gun mowing, there are no drunk red, Russian soldiers, without exception raping all the unhappy German women ... So we have what we have.
      The main question: how to fix our art ?! There is only one answer: art cannot be unprofitable. Unprincipled art gives rise to chimeras, which devour its creators, it would be good only for creators, but also the people, our people, to whom such art is fed.

      "People-State-Fatherland" - this is the slogan of every Russian patriot. A strong state, a united people, a prosperous Fatherland, which cannot be broken by internal and external enemies.
      1. Mikhail m April 14 2020 08: 39 New
        • 16
        • 4
        +12
        Quote: The Truth
        So we have what we have.

        And what do you want to have when the Mausoleum, from the rostrum of which the Victory Parade was received, is shuttered, and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief and the Minister of Defense accept the parade while sitting in armchairs? What is pop, such is parish.
    4. Lipchanin April 14 2020 07: 35 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: DMB 75
      - Do not watch modern war films!
      “But there are no others?”
      - Here are no and do not look.

      - Do not watch our television
      - And which watch?
      - Do not look
      I watch sports and some entertainment programs myself.
      Everything else is in Tynet
      Well, some more series
      Of the last I like "Cipher" I look forward to continuing
    5. Sayan April 14 2020 08: 45 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: DMB 75
      - Do not watch modern war films!
      “But there are no others?”
      - Here are no and do not look.
      Look Soviet. You don’t know about the current ones, either laughing, crying, or launching something on the TV.

      You can’t say better - I watched a movie the other day ... and everything seems to be nothing but! .. when I saw that the letters in the envelopes were brought to the front - I switched, I don’t even say how and what awards are hung on the characters in these remakes - horror.
      1. Ros 56 April 14 2020 09: 09 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        So this is from the effective movie managers from the movie. The economy must be economical. No need to invite knowledgeable professionals who would hang out all the medals as expected and reject the unnecessary shape, etc. After all, sometimes you watch a movie, life in the trenches, and the shape with a needle, clean, new helmets, the paint glistens without a scratch.
        1. begemot20091 April 14 2020 10: 29 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          And vodka and women, and completely makeup. Form - they are too lazy to open old photos, about the awards in general it is silent, who is what much. About the artists in general, they are silent - it seems that they were recruited according to the announcements in brothels - whose legs are longer. A series about combat swimmers ???? !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mura, Schura, Cat, Bagheera .... Ussa ... it is easier. According to one hundred cell phone wounds. The captain indicates to the rear admiral. They fly where I want, when I want and on what I want ... The madhouse is utter. It seems to support the pants to unclaimed artists. Recently I saw a “piece” about some Bullfinch control unit - I went to the toilet three times with laughter. I've seen enough of such insanity. Even “Stalingrad” is resting.
          1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 11: 28 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: begemot20091
            ! Mura, Schura, Cat, Bagheera .... Ussa ... it is easier. According to one hundred cell phone wounds. The captain indicates to the rear admiral. They fly where I want, when I want and on what I want ... The madhouse is utter.

            But the funny thing is that most of the series they fight on land, they’re not close to water laughing
            They even drifted somewhere into the desert laughing
          2. AK1972 April 14 2020 12: 39 New
            • 9
            • 0
            +9
            Recently I had the misfortune to watch the movie "Tanks" about the legendary run of two T-34 Kharkov-Moscow. In this "masterpiece" of modern war cinema, the truth is that this race has taken place in history. And so there is everything, a tank stop by the NKVD horse riding, 45-ok Red Army shelling, armor cutting on the go, betrayal of a crew member and Koshkin's offer to surrender to the Germans, a female crew member, the whole march passed in a snow-white blouse without a speck ( it’s in the tank), the action takes place in the summer, not a word about Koshkin’s disease. For such films of directors and scriptwriters it is necessary to plant and plant for a long time, as for ideological sabotage (and I have no doubt that these figures distort history intentionally). I would also like that the company in places not so distant to them would be bureaucrats from the Ministry of Culture who signed the rental certificate.
            1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 12: 59 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: AK1972
              female crew member

              Too shy to ask repeat
              In what quality? repeat
              1. AK1972 April 14 2020 13: 04 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                I didn’t understand this from the film, I didn’t watch it completely with gagging, switched to another channel, but still forced myself to watch until the end. However, I had read before that the woman really was a EMNIP mechanic (not a driver mechanic).
                1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 14: 14 New
                  • 5
                  • 2
                  +3
                  Quote: AK1972
                  However, I had read before that the woman really was a EMNIP mechanic (not a driver mechanic).

                  Grandfather said that they had a woman in the carriage. The shooter is a radio operator.
                  On the "Kursk Bulge" along with the entire crew with the Germans fought on daggers.
                  Our tank commander died
                  German crew cut out the whole
                  1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 14: 54 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Not having a name of conscience. You didn’t make me worse with your “minus,” you insulted the memory of my grandfather.
                    Shame on your smelly head !!!!!! -
                    1. AK1972 April 14 2020 15: 27 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Dear Sergey! If anything, minus is not mine. Compensate with a plus.
                      1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 15: 38 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: AK1972
                        Dear Sergey! If anything, minus is not mine. Compensate with a plus.

                        I know it hi
                        I even know who did it. I forgot his nickname.
                        But I know for sure that he does not leave comments where I comment
                        But minus everything is mine.
                        I wrote so
                        "Not having a name and "
                        Well, for the end of self-isolation drinks
                      2. AK1972 April 14 2020 15: 59 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Lipchanin
                        Well, for the end of self-isolation

                        Go!!! Although she did not touch me, thank God, we work even on Saturdays. The entire staff of the enterprise special permits.
                        And as for the minusers, so I also have 2 such fans, even they make absolutely neutral comments minus without explaining the reasons, they don’t catch up with what I do not care about their horizontal sticks and virtual shoulder straps, especially since the captains are quite fine with me, t .to. match my rank as stock captain.
                      3. Lipchanin April 14 2020 16: 04 New
                        • 5
                        • 1
                        +4
                        Quote: AK1972
                        And as for the minusers, so I also have 2 such fans, they even sculpt on a completely neutral comment for minus without explanation

                        I have more laughing
                        Although she did not touch me

                        Yes, and I'm not bored lol
                      4. AK1972 April 14 2020 16: 14 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        So they’re not reporting me at all !!! drinks
                      5. Lipchanin April 14 2020 17: 14 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: AK1972
                        So they’re not reporting me at all !!!

                        And to someone they shift laughing
    6. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 20: 27 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: AK1972
      And so there is everything, a tank stop by the NKVD equestrian corps, a shelling of a 45-ok Red Army column, autogenous cutting of armor on the move, a crew member’s betrayal and Koshkin’s offer to surrender to the Germans, a female crew member,

      + the emergence of German sabotage in the center of the USSR ...
    7. Pilat2009 April 15 2020 09: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: AK1972
      had the misfortune to see the movie "Tanks"

      This is trash and comedy. The genre is
  • Alf
    Alf April 14 2020 20: 26 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: Ros 56
    After all, sometimes you watch a movie, life in the trenches, and the shape with a needle, clean, new helmets, the paint glistens without a scratch.

    And the smell of cologne and perfume almost from the screen rushing.
  • Ros 56 April 14 2020 09: 02 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And the TV, moreover, do not offend him. fellow
    1. Lipchanin April 14 2020 11: 29 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Ros 56
      And the TV, moreover, do not offend him.

      He is angry with us laughing
  • knn54 April 14 2020 09: 52 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And why be surprised if the Soviet Union, Stalin criticized at the top?
    There are no shrines, there is no ideology. There are no directors. There are no OUTSTANDING actors. Like in the West, "stars" of series. But not REALLY well-deserved, folk.
    In film schools, they also pay not for studies, but for sessions.
    The result is on the screens.
    1. Pushkar April 14 2020 13: 56 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: knn54
      And why be surprised if the Soviet Union, Stalin criticized at the top?

      Not only Stalin, but Lenin, Putin kicked.
  • Sergey S. April 14 2020 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: DMB 75
    Look Soviet. You don’t know about the current ones, either laughing, crying, or launching something on the TV.

    This, of course, is correct.
    But that is not what we are looking at.

    The main question is what young people are watching ...
    And then a state decision is needed.
    Really - censorship is needed. For the topic raised from the same series as drugs, child molestation, the spread of extremist infection ....
  • rich April 14 2020 21: 04 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    the main problem of modern Russian war cinema is the lack of competent consultants and, oddly enough, the lack of censorship. Each shot of the Soviet film was hosted by several organizations. Censorship was on top.
    I will list all the organizations that participated in the acceptance of the film. This is the scenario art council, the art association of the cinema association, in which the film was directly shot, then the studio's general art council, then the film was accepted at the Goskino, then it was accepted in the ideological department of the Central Committee of the party. In the case of republican films was still the Central Committee of the party of a particular republic. As a rule, all flaws and shortcomings were removed at the level of discussion of the picture at the studio artistic council.
  • zenion April 16 2020 13: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If the Mausoleum is draped during the parade, doesn’t the author know who orders these films. The USSR will not be bad; you won’t get good money.
  • evgen1221 April 14 2020 05: 28 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    And our film production system is built in this way, or you’ll take off what you’ll give or eat in six months. Plus, the lack of any kind of intelligible propaganda for what and with what aspirations fought. My clumsy propaganda of the Second World War has infuriated me like in a kindergarten the neighboring group to play war games and we won, the description ends and then emptiness. Yes, and in the minds of the ideology of double vision the same fact was reduced to critical reflection - plus a lot of myths from the series everyone knows, plus total savings on consultants and reading books in favor of restorers and re-enactors in the role of these consultants, well, the eternal one will do, they get paid, and the money from the goskino is paid, and the rental fees and the popularity of the next uncorruption doesn’t bother anyone because they still give Trend. The T-34 review says.
  • Pessimist22 April 14 2020 05: 35 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    Previously, films were made for the people, but now for money, that’s the whole difference.
    1. Azim77 April 14 2020 07: 00 New
      • 12
      • 1
      +11
      In Soviet times, people who went through the same war or who touched them very close were filming, and now they are being filmed by those who were touched by the dashing 90s. That's the different concept of war. The second ones got their hands on stupid criminal series about disassembling the brothers, all sorts of cool "undeservedly served" against the "system" and so on - they flooded the screen with all this, so they don’t get anything else. Indeed, how do they understand why they won. Especially the same West, where they would be happy to permanent residence ..
    2. Tatyana Pershina April 14 2020 07: 55 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Previously, famous artists, directors, screenwriters lived in communal apartments or "Khrushchev", rode the metro or tram, stood in lines for sausage .... That is, they lived in the country, personally interacted with people of different social and financial conditions, and not in a fenced "elite" moral and physical environment. Are contemporary cultural figures (are they cultures?) Primitive in their cultural needs, and they transfer this to their "imperishable". Considering, moreover, self-versed in everything is better than specialists.
    3. Den717 April 14 2020 08: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Pessimist22
      Previously, films were made for the people, but now for money, that’s the whole difference.

      So they take money from the people. But the people are different. And the majority of the people, regrettably, arrange all kinds of "Houses ..." and shows with peeping under someone else's blanket. And the greatest fees at the box office are collected not by “Stalker”, but by all sorts of “boobs ... blood and river with crazy shooting”, flavored with black wine and mud at their grandfathers (“you see, they see it like that”). In Soviet times, to get on the screen, anyone, even a cartoon, underwent a detailed examination, mainly ideological and cultural, I would say. The Ministry of Culture pulled the people behind it "towards bright ideals", and today the Ministry of Culture is lagging behind the needs of the people, but these requirements do not always fit into censored vocabulary. That’s the whole difference.
  • Valery Valery April 14 2020 05: 37 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    So who installed this “filter” for modern “film works” about the Great Patriotic War? And who allocates money for this vile lie? Addresses, surnames, appearances? And why repeat it from film to film?

    Here, really, I would like to know!
    1. evgen1221 April 14 2020 06: 24 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Everything is written there, with financial and media support from the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. Addresses and appearances on their website.
  • Amateur April 14 2020 05: 45 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    On the grave crisis in contemporary Russian war cinema


    While the state will finance, and television channels will purchase this guano, until then they will shoot. Check out the Zvezda channel funded by the Department of Defense. By the number of anti-Soviet and anti-Russian films, you might think that the owner of the channel is the Pentagon.
  • pmkemcity April 14 2020 05: 49 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Nothing to add:
  • Angrybeard April 14 2020 05: 59 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    This crisis of ideas is due to the nature of the conditions in which citizens are placed. And it concerns not only Russia, look at any CIS film, I can’t shout I do not believe it from the very first shots, with the exception of authentic simple stories "from the backwoods" that are not affected by much modern realities.
    I would generally forbid making war films and any remakes of an old movie. Let them practice on simple stories for now. When I start to believe and sincerely experience a simple family history, I can go further.
    And for the woman in the tank and the obligatory sekas “for otherwise the people will not go to the movies” in general 15 years of hard labor. On TV, there’s nothing at all except Baskov, Buzova and the defective clowns and clowns of the Petrosyano Theater for 20 years, and they want to bring up a good taste? This is already beyond the bounds of good and evil, an experiment to dull and destroy the essence of the Russian soul and faith.
  • Free wind April 14 2020 06: 01 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    It seems to me that there are good films, well, do not blame everything.
    1. victor50 April 14 2020 07: 55 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Free Wind
      It seems to me that there are good films, well, do not blame everything.

      Maybe there is ... But I have not met them. Name it. Maybe, Shtrafbat, Bastards, The last armored train, Love at gunpoint, etc.?
      1. poul_579 April 14 2020 08: 59 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        I personally liked: Narkomovsky convoy, Greetings from Katyusha, Thirst, Without the right to make a mistake, Military unit, Yalta, Disappeared, In August 44th, 28 Panfilovites, etc.
  • nikvic46 April 14 2020 06: 02 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    You watch a movie like this and think how we could win such a fierce war. If someone else leads there, then it’s nothing. Then you will switch to another program and Zuleikha will open your eyes to the essence of Soviet society. If you hate your past then you won’t have a future. You just throw mud on your parents.
    1. Old partisan April 14 2020 07: 27 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      and GDP like it, if it weren’t like, then such films wouldn’t be in turmoil. And we would not have seen them.
  • bober1982 April 14 2020 06: 04 New
    • 4
    • 17
    -13
    The author of this article, somehow unpretentiously and rusticly, advertises Hollywood, and also highlights his opuses in large and bold type.
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 07: 17 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      And with what do not agree?
      1. bober1982 April 14 2020 07: 24 New
        • 2
        • 9
        -7
        About how, after 75 years, this movie portrays the enemy as the enemy, and the hero as the hero. And, further, in the same vein. This, you so respectfully speak of Hollywood cheapies.
        1. avia12005 April 14 2020 07: 31 New
          • 13
          • 1
          +12
          You did not understand. Hollywood cheapies for their viewers draw their soldiers heroes. Our cheap things draw our soldiers to our viewer cattle.
          1. bober1982 April 14 2020 08: 01 New
            • 1
            • 8
            -7
            Quote: avia12005
            You did not understand

            Saving Private Ryan, Spielberg himself, a comedy film, and without our political instructors.
            1. avia12005 April 14 2020 08: 05 New
              • 9
              • 1
              +8
              And the fact that for one privates the whole team was sent is definitely a comedy))
              1. Doctor April 14 2020 11: 00 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                And the fact that for one privates the whole team was sent is definitely a comedy))

                Not sent. The Ryan-Fred Niland prototype was simply sent home from the front to the United States to serve as a military police officer.

                In the states there was
                The policy of the “last survivor” is US Department of Defense directive No. 1315.15, titled “Special Rules for Regulating Survivors,” which describes a set of rules in the armed forces designed to protect members of a family who have already lost their families from military service and conscription.
                1. Alf
                  Alf April 14 2020 20: 38 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Arzt
                  In the states there was
                  The policy of the “last survivor” is US Department of Defense directive No. 1315.15, titled “Special Rules for Regulating Survivors,” which describes a set of rules in the armed forces designed to protect members of a family who have already lost their families from military service and conscription.

                  And then Roosevelt and the US Commander-in-Chief in Europe after January 45th were unpleasantly surprised that the troops did not show the proper stamina, but simply flee.
                  1. Doctor April 14 2020 21: 06 New
                    • 3
                    • 3
                    0
                    And then Roosevelt and the US Commander-in-Chief in Europe after January 45th were unpleasantly surprised that the troops did not show the proper stamina, but simply flee.

                    And how is it that the last son and the stamina of the troops were not sent to war? Under the tsarist regime, the last breadwinner was not taken to the army at all.
                    Or was it necessary, as in the "father of nations" regime, to beat out 7-8 sons, to the last, and then hang the "mother-heroine"?
                    1. Alf
                      Alf April 14 2020 21: 08 New
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      +3
                      Quote: Arzt
                      Or was it necessary, as in the "father of nations" regime, to beat out 7-8 sons, to the last, and then hang the "mother-heroine"?

                      A more specific about the mother-heroine?
                      And it’s connected very simply, they did not perceive the war as our people, and therefore they draped without any remorse.
                      1. Doctor April 14 2020 21: 25 New
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        -2
                        A more specific about the mother-heroine?

                        Epistinia Stepanova, Praskovya Volodichkina, the Gadzanov brothers.

                        And it’s connected very simply, they did not perceive the war as our people, and therefore they draped without any remorse.

                        We know that they were draping, but we were not draping, but then again, how is this connected with the fact that the last breadwinner was not sent to the war?
                      2. Alf
                        Alf April 14 2020 21: 36 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: Arzt
                        but again, how does this relate to the fact that the last breadwinner was not sent to war?

                        I speak once. If you do not understand, your headache.
                        In the USSR, ALL the people stood up and went to war, no one said, I am the last, so I won’t go. There was a calculation of ZIS-3 from six brothers, all went to war, no one was left. And there were many such examples, no one stayed at home.
                      3. Alf
                        Alf April 14 2020 21: 40 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Arzt
                        Gadzanov brothers.

                        The Gazdanov brothers (Osset. Gzdænty æfsymærtæ) are the seven Gazdanov brothers who died at different times in the battles of World War II. All brothers were born in the village of Dzuarikau (North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, RSFSR, USSR) and were called up to the front from their native village. Their mother - Tasso Gazdanova (Vanieva) - died after the third funeral. Asahmat's father lived to see the end of the war, but died after receiving the last funeral [specify] [style] [1].

                        Where is the hanged heroine mother here?
                      4. Alf
                        Alf April 14 2020 21: 44 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Arzt
                        Epistinia Stepanova,

                        Epistinia Fedorovna Stepanova (1882-1969) - a Russian woman, whose eight sons died in the war, holder of the orders "Mother Heroine" and World War I degree.

                        And this "hanged" ..
                        Praskovya Volodichkina

                        They also hung bloody NKVD-shniki.
                        Before the Great Patriotic War, the Volodichkin family lived in the village of Alekseevka: the head of the family Pavel Vasilyevich Volodichkin (died in 1935), his wife Praskovya Eremeevna Volodichkina (1874-1943) and nine sons - Alexander, Andrei, Peter, Ivan, Vasily, Mikhail, Konstantin , Fedor and Nikolai. When the war began, all nine Volodichkin sons went to the front.
                        Five of them - Nikolai, Andrey, Fedor, Mikhail, Alexander - died in 1941 - 1943, Vasily - in January 1945. Peter, Ivan and Konstantin returned after victory in the village with heavy wounds received during the war, which soon brought them to the graves. Their mother, Praskovya Eremeevna, did not wait for the return of her three last sons - her heart could not stand the loss.
                      5. Doctor April 14 2020 21: 59 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        Epistinia Fedorovna Stepanova (1882-1969) - a Russian woman, whose eight sons died in the war, Knight of the orders "Mother Heroine" and World War I degree.

                        I managed to get it.

                        Their mother, Praskovya Eremeevna, did not wait for the return of her three last sons - her heart could not stand the loss.

                        I did not have time to get it.

                        What the problem is, I do not understand. And what does the NKVDshniki have to do with it.
                      6. Alf
                        Alf April 14 2020 22: 10 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: Arzt
                        What the problem is, I do not understand.

                        Your words ?
                        Or was it necessary, as in the "father of nations" regime, to beat out 7-8 sons, to the last, and then hang the "mother-heroine"?
                      7. Doctor April 14 2020 22: 39 New
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        -1
                        Your words ?
                        Or was it necessary, as in the "father of nations" regime, to beat out 7-8 sons, to the last, and then hang the "mother-heroine"?

                        Конечно.
                        To keep at least one child in the family alive in the war is capitalism.

                        It is mercilessly to throw all the children into the meat grinder to the last and, as compensation and consolation, hang a medal - this is socialism.
                        I’ll clarify: socialism in its Stalinist sense.
            2. Batonkt April 24 2020 13: 00 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Even as they took in 1853-4 in the family of my ancestors they took the breadwinner for the Crimean War, leaving my 1,5-year-old ancestor and his 1 month old. sister in the care of mother (breadwinner's wife) and grandmother. The only thing is that upon loss of the breadwinner, the family (until the son of the breadwinner has come of age) was paid annual maintenance in the amount of 75 rubles.
  • Alf
    Alf April 14 2020 20: 36 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: bober1982
    About how, after 75 years, this movie portrays the enemy as the enemy, and the hero as a hero.

    In Hollywood films, there are two points that fundamentally distinguish these films from the masterpieces of the USSR.
    1. American soldiers perceive the war as work, without hatred for the enemy, "we were sent to fight as a job."
    2. Too often in their films the Germans are presented simply as “soldiers from that side,” and there are often times when an American and a German soldier act together.
    In addition, American films are very, albeit imperceptibly, distort the story. In the Brothers in Arms, one of the GG says to Winters-We allowed the Russians to take Berlin.
    1. Siberian54 April 15 2020 16: 31 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Correctly, German punishers did not carry out executions of hostages (20 for 1) in the quarters of San Francisco or Detroit ..
  • Talgat 148 April 14 2020 06: 09 New
    • 13
    • 2
    +11
    By the identity of equipment, equipment, and especially weapons, I like movies from Belarusfilm!
    The state border is a series, a series about the beginning of the Second World War, the outpost commander is armed with the PPS-40 and not the PPS-41, which appeared in the fall of 1941. German tanks are replicas from the BMP-1 in the Brest Fortress, but there’s nothing wrong with that, etc.
    I was pleased with the film by 28 Panfilov’s, the armament corresponds to the time, especially the participation of the SVT-40! Deprived in the Soviet cinema!
    1. The leader of the Redskins April 14 2020 06: 46 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      "Dnieper line". The same Belarusfilm and well-designed details.
    2. Old partisan April 14 2020 07: 29 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      By the way, 28 Panfilov’s people were withdrawn with public money without the participation of the Ministry of Culture.
      1. Alf
        Alf April 14 2020 20: 39 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Old Partisan
        By the way, 28 Panfilov’s people were withdrawn with public money without the participation of the Ministry of Culture.

        Therefore, it turned out to be a film about the War.
    3. NKT
      NKT April 14 2020 08: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The proper use of weapons and equipment of that time is aerobatics. To new “directors” at least learn how to use the correct form, and read about the status of orders and medals from both our and the German side.
  • Plowman April 14 2020 06: 28 New
    • 10
    • 1
    +9
    Corruption. A gang of hackers who cut dibs and they do not give a damn about all dates. Business and nothing personal. So they were taught and what is there to be surprised.
  • Jurkovs April 14 2020 06: 30 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    This article would be in the eyes of Putin.
    1. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 20: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Jurkovs
      This article would be in the eyes of Putin.

      He was somehow already surprised. Why is there a little positive in social networks? How fell from the moon ...
  • evgen1221 April 14 2020 06: 32 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    And as an indicator of government procurement and a litmus test of the needs of our leaders, this (filmmaking) of our Nikita without you, we will lose Mikhalkov, that's a brilliant sculptor of any government. Compare him to Sibiriada and Tired mother to his sun, Here's how to subtly feel the moment and order, as well as talented to fulfill his mother at the highest level. In general, as in Kin Dza-ja, if society does not have an idea, then there is no goal, there is no goal, there is nothing to strive for and create, there is no goal, so we are standing still merrily spinning in one place, which gives excellent prospects for manipulation. It is brilliant to forbid ideology in a society where, without a high goal, its very existence is inconceivable.
    1. poul_579 April 14 2020 09: 02 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      His brother Andron removed Siberia.
    2. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 20: 41 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: evgen1221
      And as an indicator of government procurement and a litmus test of the needs of our leaders, this (filmmaking) of our Nikita, without you, we will disappear Mikhalkov — that’s an ingenious sculptor of any government.

  • parusnik April 14 2020 06: 41 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    What state, such films, desovetization, in a word ...
  • Octopus April 14 2020 07: 00 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The author on his own wave.
    It is even more strange that viewing, for example, foreign and modern Pearl Harbor, Midway, Pacific or Brothers in Arms evokes the same sense of truthfulness displayed on the screen


    The author compared, of course. It’s just that PX and Midway cause great irritation to people in the subject - they have the same disregard for real people and real history as in domestic crafts. The Pacific and the Brothers, yes, works of a slightly different nature.

    Why are you faking the truth about the war?


    The truth is not needed.
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 07: 17 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      It evokes a sense of truthfulness, and not compliance with historical truth. This is not the same thing)
      1. Octopus April 14 2020 07: 21 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        Quote: avia12005
        Evokes a sense of truthfulness

        It causes you.

        Not for people who are interested in Pacific history.

        Separate conversation, what exactly do you have evokes a sense of truthfulness. In the western film, give you raped German women and shootings of prisoners of war, and, for example, “Only old people go into battle”, as I understand, you are ready to eat without it.
        1. avia12005 April 14 2020 07: 30 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Can you read? I'm talking about something completely different. The fact that in their western films their soldiers are always heroes, and in our contemporary films our soldiers are a dumb herd. Now it is clear?
          1. Octopus April 14 2020 07: 33 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            Quote: avia12005
            The fact that in Western films their soldiers are always heroes

            )))

            No. Far from it.

            Quote: avia12005
            and in our modern day our soldiers are wordless

            In general, it’s hard for me to imagine a goodie in modern Russian commercial cinema. Even St. Vladimir turned out, to put it mildly, strange for the saint.

            However, I follow badly.
  • hhhhhhh April 14 2020 07: 20 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It is necessary to introduce quotas for criminals and priests in the Red Army in the cinema for a year. In the archives, see how much it was, and as a percentage, show the same amount in a movie.
    If there is no archival evidence of the events in the movie about the war. Bastards, for example. At the bottom of the entire film is the caption "A film of lies, there has never been such a thing in the Red Army. Watching a movie is harmful." like packs of cigarettes.
    Distributors of pirated content could do this for their homeland.
    1. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 20: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: hhhhhhh
      Distributors of pirated content could do this for their homeland.

      Then the torrent persecutors would not pursue it out of duty (so-so), but fiercely, at the behest of the soul. And the first out of their pants would be a sweet couple of Bondarchuk Mikhalkov.
      1. hhhhhhh April 14 2020 20: 45 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        For the compulsory inscription to entrust the office of Mikhalkov, the author.))) There is no evidence of an attack by cuttings, the inscription "Lies" on the whole film.
  • Horst78 April 14 2020 07: 22 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Soviet films about the Second World War have always been advised by the military (from lieutenant colonel and above) who basically passed it. And now they are filming "experts" grown in Hollywood.
    1. Million April 14 2020 07: 52 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      To the point! Now, instead of "Yes," they answer "That's right."
      I am ashamed ...
      1. AAK
        AAK April 14 2020 09: 01 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        A colleague, alas, but both answers are statutory and from the times of the USSR, only "is" is the fleet, and "so sure" is land ..
        Well, about quality and reliability, it’s enough to look at the mass of videos distributed on the Web about which of our favorite artists fought (or for the youngest of that generation - survived the war in childhood) ... a huge majority is obtained, hence reliability, sincerity, vitality ... look, “They fought for their homeland ..” or “Belorussky Train Station”, you don’t need to say anything, everything is clear and so ...
        1. Million April 14 2020 09: 12 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Wrong about fleet and land. The construction charter is one for all
          1. AAK
            AAK April 14 2020 09: 16 New
            • 5
            • 6
            -1
            I don’t know, colleague, I served in air defense and answered “so precisely”, my cousin - naval, I served on “singing frigates”, they always answered “on the ship”, probably according to the Ship’s charter ...
    2. victor50 April 14 2020 08: 02 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Horst78
      And now they are filming "experts" grown in Hollywood.

      And, judging by their products, they never served in the armed forces. Not a single person from the whole composition.
    3. Dante Alighieri April 14 2020 08: 31 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Oh, if grown up in Hollywood, more likely modern "cultural figures" would take an example from Bollywood ... The same examples cited by the author were taken or produced by none other than Stephen Spielberg, who set himself the task of showing the Americans, most of whom the war only indirectly affected why war is really SCARY. And he did it. Both Brothers in Arms and Pacific Front and Saving Private Raina are very powerful films. Moreover, the first two with a big stretch can be called commercially successful, because they could be seen either only by cable viewers who have an HBO channel, or those who bought a DVD. And this at a cost of $ 120 million for each! And it became a statement that the Americans make a movie purely for the sake of making money is not as clear as it might seem at first glance.

      In Soviet cinema there was a different approach. The Soviet man did not need to explain why the war is SCARY, he knew this from his own experience, from the history of his family. Such people did not make sense to injure once again suffered horrors. However, Soviet directors even managed to put such a powerful message into their abstracted image of hostilities that for a long time he worked no worse than the obviously more realistic works of their Western colleagues. However, over time, as the rumble of the guns of that war is removed, the memory of it in the minds of new generations fades, and in the wake of the Americans we also have a need to depict the war as realistically as possible. So that the new citizens of our country could appreciate what their ancestors went through and how valuable they got so familiar freedom. It’s just that we didn’t have our Spielberg, and the Soviet directors have either passed away or retired. And the current clip makers like Bandarchuk, who came to replace them, can only create a beautiful picture, completely forgetting that it needs to be endowed with an appropriate meaning. And what sense can there be in purely commercial projects? At the same time, they don’t understand that the box office success of the same Spielberg is nothing more than an indicator of well done work, thanks to the audience of the studio and the director, while for modern Russian “movie makers” making money is an end in itself. And in this we, in truth, have surpassed Hollywood.
  • The leader of the Redskins April 14 2020 07: 24 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I could not help but return to the topic ... Recently I watched in YouTube our next "masterpiece" about the youngest son of the regiment. He was six years old, sort of.
    And interestingly, a historical fact. As indicated in the article, you can shoot based on heroics. Moreover, there are many examples. A lot ... But HOW to remove that? !!!
    They took the story with this boy and “smeared” the snot on the table with a thin layer. The battalion commander’s love line was inserted, everyone was dressed upright, the actress was chosen sympathetically ... And for the main feat of this guy they allotted a couple of minutes at the end of the film and it was so blurry that those who don’t know the story thought it was probably an ordinary event !
  • bar
    bar April 14 2020 07: 47 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    All these supposedly “historical” popular films were shot on the same plot. Like a war, always with the women at the forefront. Like the love of preoccupied rabbits under bombing / shelling. Only the scenery changes - in the tank, on the plane, just in the trench. About the reliability of even a conversation there. What is the next incorruptible "Fighters" with Dyuzhevom and "Jackson". Those are also "fighters", both under 2 meters tall wassat
    And now all these contributions, which are supposedly supposedly to educate the patriotism of the younger generation, are paid from the budget, i.e. our money. All this is disgusting no
  • Pecheneg April 14 2020 08: 07 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    On this subject, as I already wrote a comment - all modern Russian cinema about WWII is just shit. The commissar is a fanatic, a special bastard, a commander, and also some kind of kral, really constantly painted walks.
  • Grading April 14 2020 08: 15 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Quote: Pecheneg
    On this subject, as I already wrote a comment - all modern Russian cinema about WWII is just shit. The commissar is a fanatic, a special bastard, a commander, and also some kind of kral, really constantly painted walks.

    1. pmkemcity April 14 2020 11: 30 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Cinema and the Germans!
    2. avia12005 April 14 2020 17: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Great illustration to the above. I have no words. Censored.
  • Brigadier April 14 2020 08: 15 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    "The sense of objectivity in such films is caused by the details: for example, in the Pacific Ocean, one of the American heroes after the battle is amused by the fact that ... he throws stones at the half-demolished head of a dead Japanese soldier, frozen at the moment of death behind a machine gun. And besides, he rips out golden teeth from dead Japanese soldiers. "

    The author, in my opinion, you turned down about objectivity!
    I understand you, that if in our films the fighters after the battle tore the golden teeth from the killed SS men, this would greatly enhance by you sense of objectivity.
    And if at the same time they were still Cossack sabers, shouting "Eh-ma!" cut in half wounded enemies then for you would it be almost 3D? So?

    In “Fighters” there is an episode when the pilot, after receiving her money, decides to rob 2 bandits. She kills one, leaves the other alive ...
    There you have it, author, and the feeling of that objectivity in the details for which you drown ...
    Or is it not for you?
    Maybe you don’t have enough torn gold teeth from the killed bandit?
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 11: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Read it again. Everything is relative.
  • EvilLion April 14 2020 08: 17 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    And do not go to the cinema to all sorts of "Stalingrad" and watch on TV all sorts of "Penalties." Well, whine about how under Stalin allegedly for any reason dispossessed too.
  • rocket757 April 14 2020 08: 26 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Problems in the cinema, military ???
    I don’t even want to discuss it. A clear program for denigrating the great history of the Soviet Union.
    Who rules the “ball” with us everywhere? Who has all sorts of figures in the servants? The ruling class, those who now have power and money, and they have our Soviet history as a sickle in their innermost, i.e. according to their stolen / appropriated wealth!
    In general, there is nothing to discuss.
    So I want to remember "get up cursed branded ......"
    It is high time to get up and become one whole, for our bright life, for the future of our descendants ...
  • Prometey April 14 2020 08: 31 New
    • 3
    • 9
    -6
    As for the intelligent, aristocratic Germans in contemporary Russian cinema ... The film "Seventeen Moments of Spring" does not bother the author, how are the Germans portrayed there?
    What doesn’t like the movie “Indestructible”? Well, yes, a female mechanic, and even fighting in a tank. Well, this is all a feature film, not a documentary.
    Personally, I don’t like the movie "Only Old Men Go to Battle" - well, it tastes and color ... I don’t understand why it is shown all the time on May 9th - it’s not at all military.
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 11: 01 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      This “mechanic” looks like a podium on the front line. The fight over her two officers in front of the soldiers is a delirium of pure water. Okay, they could have used one on one in the face ... I’ll get out from under the engine clean and made up, I’ll say nothing at all
    2. avia12005 April 14 2020 11: 02 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      So there Stirlitz is the same, and not the front, but in Berlin.
    3. bober1982 April 14 2020 11: 07 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Quote: Prometey
      Personally, I don’t like the movie "Only Old Men Go to Battle"

      This is because L. Bykov was a brilliant actor (Petya Mokin and others), and he was weak as a director - directing is weak, naive and not true, by the way, I also do not like the film. Of course, pioneers and Komsomol members (today's young people) should watch this film for patriotic education. Not more than that.
      1. EvilLion April 15 2020 08: 30 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        There is no need to write nonsense. An ingenious movie in which there is a clear understanding of what was shot and why, the historical truthfulness could, if necessary, be corrected by real WWII pilots.
        1. bober1982 April 15 2020 08: 51 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: EvilLion
          There is no need to write nonsense.

          I did not understand anything from what you said.
          Read the memories ....... real WWII pilots, nothing to do with this brilliant film.
    4. Sergey S. April 14 2020 11: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Prometey
      Personally, I don’t like the movie "Only Old Men Go to Battle" - well, it tastes and color ... I don’t understand why it is shown all the time on May 9th - it’s not at all military.

      This something happened tastefully ...
  • Dimy4 April 14 2020 08: 37 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    In today's Russian war cinema, they almost always appear ironed, glazed, elegant characters, fighting the Soviet "cattle" aristocratic and even intelligent ...

    The authors of such films directly feel sympathy for the SS and Wehrmacht. But from viewing such opuses it becomes so disgusting. You, the generation that grew up in Soviet films about the war, can’t wash your brain, but kids. I specifically do not include these “masterpieces” with my own, let them first go and see for example.
  • mr.ZinGer April 14 2020 08: 39 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    We have a crisis around, and you're all about CINEMA.
    1. AAK
      AAK April 14 2020 09: 07 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      A colleague, just in time of crisis, when people are sitting at home and watching TV video, they need to leave at least some trace in their souls left, now people have a little time to think, comprehend ...
  • Valery Potapov April 14 2020 08: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You talked about the main thing. The distortion of history, the abuse of demshiza over our grandfathers bears fruit first of all among the grand recipients. While paying, there will be stupid people commissars from our glorious pederasts ...
  • Konatantin 1992 April 14 2020 08: 50 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    "Go and see," as they say (the strongest film, very heavy). All this is understandable, I absolutely agree with the author, but it is clear to any "thinking person" (who does not just watch movies under the "beer"). This is really scary ... to us, the citizens of Russia, the successors of the USSR draw the image of a disgusting state (the USSR if someone does not understand), in which people fought against the Nazis and Nazis in spite of ... just going to slaughter, redeeming blood, at gunpoint TT Politruk or personally L.P. Beria, and this is removed by Russian people if that !!! As a grandson of a World War II veteran who liberated Sofia, Budapest and Vienna, I am ashamed .... Of the latter, if you want to smear yourself with the fierce anti-Soviet and terror of Stalin and Beria, look (if you can) Rzhev and a completely new Zuleikha open her eyes .... You will get blood from your eyes and ears.
    1. EvilLion April 15 2020 08: 31 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Why watch it when you can just read the documentary evidence of the atrocities of the Nazis?
  • depressant April 14 2020 08: 54 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Of the Western films about the Soviet Army, I saw only "K-19" and "Enemy at the Gates." Our military sharply criticized them for the mismatch of details and the lack of historical truth. But these films amazed me. And you know what? With great respect, I would even say, a reverence for our submariners and defenders of Stalingrad. Jude Law as a sniper Zaitsev generally looks holy. There is no such relation to our warriors in contemporary Russian films. I tried to watch, it didn’t work out. Adventures in the surroundings of war. Heroes of empathy do not cause. The directors are mediocre and in addition Russophobia. Just grantoed. They don’t understand what kind of audience the film is made for. Or vice versa - they understand very well, but they have the goal of entangling the audience with Russophobic ideology, forming from it a bunch of universal people, of which each is on its own.
    1. Prometey April 14 2020 10: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: depressant
      Of the Western films about the Soviet Army, I saw only "K-19" and "Enemy at the Gates."

      I agree - K-19 falls out of the satire line of Western films about our military.
    2. Sergey S. April 14 2020 11: 59 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: depressant
      Of the Western films about the Soviet Army, I saw only "K-19" and "Enemy at the Gates." Our military sharply criticized them for the mismatch of details and the lack of historical truth. But these films amazed me. And you know what? With great respect, I would even say, a reverence for our submariners and defenders of Stalingrad.

      Into the account of "K-19".
      The crew member was telling ...
      A woman came to the director, showed the script to the submariners ... They gave advice, told how it was ...
      Then she came again, so that the first spectators were crew members ...
      She was smashed for distorting reality ....
      She almost burst into tears .... Her argument was very simple. If you show, then what they say:
      1. In America, no one will watch - not interesting.
      2. Recognize the film as "red propaganda."

      I myself, the first time I could not watch it - it was disgusting.
      The second time I began to look in order to identify lies. After 20 misgivings, the account went astray ...
      There, even the epaulets of the protagonist have problems - in different episodes, different ranks ...

      By the way, the film begins with the fact that the boat is pushed out of the factory with imperfections and without a full test cycle. This is a lie. But, for example, the American "Thresher" died for precisely this reason.
      Metamorphoses ...
      And who cares ...

      And about the fact that Korchilov went into radiation as a volunteer, this amers will never understand. He no longer served in the reactor compartment, but knew the equipment better than others.
      Our Heroes have eternal memory. And we are responsible so that this memory does not go away with us.
    3. EvilLion April 15 2020 08: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      If “K-19” is an attempt in a film about Americanized Soviet submariners with typical Hollywood tricks, then I do not remember point-blank respect for “Enemy at the Gates”. The usual anti-Soviet agitation.
  • Konatantin 1992 April 14 2020 09: 03 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And so I can advise (although if a person, person, not biomass), see old Soviet films. Epic movie Liberation, Some old people go into battle, And the dawns here are quiet, Officers, They fought for their Motherland, Cranes are flying, Go and see (everyone should see to know and remember ...), Ati-bats were soldiers, Father of a soldier, In war as in war, Shield and sword, Battalions ask for fire, Hot snow, Lark, Chronicle of a dive bomber .... this list is very long.
    1. albert April 14 2020 14: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      From modern I can recommend the documentary series "The Great War" in 2011. It was filmed very interesting, reviewed many times. The old media company did an excellent thing.
    2. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 21: 11 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Konatantin 1992
      And so I can advise (although if a person, person, not biomass), see old Soviet films. Epic movie Liberation, Some old people go into battle, And the dawns here are quiet, Officers, They fought for their Motherland, Cranes are flying, Go and see (everyone should see to know and remember ...), Ati-bats were soldiers, Father of a soldier, In war as in war, Shield and sword, Battalions ask for fire, Hot snow, Lark, Chronicle of a dive bomber .... this list is very long.

      And perhaps the most piercing film is Ordinary Fascism.
    3. EvilLion April 15 2020 08: 40 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      "Release" does not look in any case. to learn materiel according to normal historical documents. I tried to watch “Shield and Sword”, threw it away, but I don’t spare KINA about spies.

      "And the dawns here are quiet" can hardly be called a military one, after all, a big war is somewhere on the sidelines, leaving the story of the sergeant unfit for combat training on the front and 5 girls with whom he has to stop the superior enemy group. In this regard, he is even further from the war than the “Ballad of a Soldier,” where GG at least does not actually leave the front.
      1. Marine engineer April 15 2020 15: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Is Living and Dead good?
  • DPN
    DPN April 14 2020 09: 12 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Yes, they became anti-Soviet, starting with the film; Bastards "to this day.
  • Maks1995 April 14 2020 09: 12 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You might think that the rest of “modern Russian cinema” is not a crisis.
    Stupid films, often stupidly worsened, copied from the west.
  • vel1163 April 14 2020 09: 15 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Well, how can our directors and producers get out if there is a clear installation of soldiers and people are heroes and power is crap. There is victory, but everything was bad in the Soviet country. If you make truthful films, you must immediately say that there were good and bad ones. But the plants worked The military quickly learned and soon surpassed the German, the Russian soldier is the best in the world, the Russian commanders too, and Stalin the inspirer and organizer of victories.
  • Maxim364364 April 14 2020 09: 22 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    In the Brest Fortress, the NKVD schnick was well removed, in the heat of battle split the German saboteur, fought with his subordinates to the end, died as a hero in battle. No icons, policies, cuttings from shovels and stupidity like Nikita Sergeevich.
  • jekasimf April 14 2020 09: 33 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    One day I accidentally saw a sloppy filmets, about the creator of the T-34 tank, Koshkin. It’s called “Tanks.” It's just a scribe! I was sick for a week.
    https://yandex.fr/video/preview/?filmId=9054205279851615549&text=фильм%20Танки&path=wizard&parent-reqid=1586845941432597-161829324765486141700324-production-app-host-vla-web-yp-107&redircnt=1586845959.1
    1. Siberian54 April 15 2020 16: 43 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Actually, the T-34 was designed by another person, Koshkin was just the administrator who sat down on the finished project, and the designer was sat up for execution, so the tank had so many "children's sores - the remaining people did not pull the job
  • Gardamir April 14 2020 09: 46 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Discussion, miracles on bends. It is necessary to scold the defective managers, but not to hurt the power under which these menagers flourish.
  • evgenii67 April 14 2020 10: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And who generally watches modern war films ??? Well, let's start with the fact that not many people love war films, and those who love know that the best films about the Second World War were shot in the USSR and only a few are being advertised, or they specifically watch modern feces to discuss later on.
  • svp67 April 14 2020 10: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It's a strange thing, you look at the Soviet “At war as at war”, “Only old people go into battle” or “Baltic sky” and believe in what is happening on the screen.
    And what is the feeling after watching "Die Hard" or "Sergeant Tsybuli's Country Trip"?
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 10: 56 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Normal. Now, if 90 percent of films on this subject would be "Country Trips" or "Die Hard," then it would be sick.
      1. svp67 April 14 2020 10: 58 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: avia12005
        Normal. Now, if 90 percent of films on this subject would be "Country Trips" or "Die Hard," then it would be sick.

        And the fact of the matter is that from then on all the “slag” “crumbled and the donkey” and “diamonds” remained, the same thing will happen with modern films over time.
        1. avia12005 April 14 2020 13: 56 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          What will happen to those who form their view of the war on the basis of such “diamonds”. And what will happen to the country and to us? Salt.
          1. svp67 April 14 2020 14: 02 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: avia12005
            What will happen to those who form their view of the war on the basis of such “diamonds”.

            I think that “28 Panfilovites”, “Boundary”, I really hope for “Podolsky cadets” will be excellent “diamonds”
            1. avia12005 April 14 2020 14: 26 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Exactly! God grant that it be so.
  • iouris April 14 2020 10: 30 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    "See the root!" (Kozma Rods)
    Art is a superstructure phenomenon related to the sphere of ideology. Having not solved the fundamental issue of ownership and methods of distribution of the material and spiritual goods produced, it is impossible to create an alternative ideology and new art that adequately reflects the goals and objectives of the people!
    The proposed text is another "cry of Yaroslavna."
    1. Tavrik April 14 2020 16: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Correctly! We read the work of Lenin about partisanship in literature.
  • U-58 April 14 2020 10: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Somehow, the theme of the characters is touched on casually.
    But we all see how the presence of a huge number of representatives in carpet-tunic tunics and hats with a blue top is an inalienable attribute of modern vernal cinema.
    NKVD is our FSE.
    Moreover, front-line counterintelligence agents are also shown in this form, which the spirit did not have.
    And they are half the action of the films ...
    1. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 21: 19 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: U-58
      But we all see how the presence of a huge number of representatives in carpet-tunic tunics and hats with a blue top is an inalienable attribute of modern vernal cinema.
      NKVD is our FSE.

      The well-known artist Peter Dennis.

      So they represent our soldiers. Apparently, the stereotype is once a political instructor, then a Jew.
  • Prometey April 14 2020 10: 37 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Yes, and in Soviet films there were enough tricks.
    "Ati-bats, soldiers were coming." Heroic, not bad movie in general. But the plot itself hurts the eye. 1944, the Red Army inflicts devastating blows on the Wehrmacht ... and bam - as in 1941 a certain platoon of tank destroyers, armed only with PTR, appeared at the forefront of the attacking Germans. I understand that it was necessary to show the heroism of Soviet soldiers. But, damn it, it's already 1944. What grenades and PTR in the fight against tanks? Not a single anti-tank gun. Why the heck was it to omit the command of the Red Army, showing that for 3 years nothing had changed in the war and that the Red Army men, like in Moscow, in 41, were rushing under tanks with grenades? Moreover, there even the "Tiger" rolled out from somewhere. And with his bare hands you almost have to stop. Oh, such films. "Hot snow" and "Battalions ask for fire" - our all.
    1. avia12005 April 14 2020 11: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Everything happened at the front. The main thing is the pitch. This is respect and gratitude, not dousing.
    2. Trapperxnumx April 14 2020 11: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Prometey
      But, damn it, it's already 1944. What grenades and PTR in the fight against tanks? Not a single anti-tank gun. Why the heck was it to omit the command of the Red Army, showing that for 3 years nothing had changed in the war and that the Red Army men, like in Moscow, in 41, were rushing under tanks with grenades?

      Do you think that this could not be in 1944? I watched the German Chronicle and 44 and 45, and some of our descriptions of the fighting. Believe me, everything happened there. Wehrmacht had small-town successes. They beat off settlements, stations, ambushes were arranged, prisoners were captured. Another thing is that they generally did not exert any influence on the events as a whole.
    3. Alf
      Alf April 14 2020 21: 20 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Prometey
      Ati-bats, soldiers were coming. "A heroic, not bad film in general. But the plot itself hurts the eye. 1944,

      Stop. What side is this 1944th year?
      1. Prometey April 14 2020 22: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Alf
        Stop. What side is this 1944th year?

        Well, with this - according to the script of the film. Well, something even looks like a breakthrough from the Iasi-Chisinau boiler.
        1. Alf
          Alf April 14 2020 22: 17 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Prometey
          Quote: Alf
          Stop. What side is this 1944th year?

          Well, with this - according to the script of the film. Well, something even looks like a breakthrough from the Iasi-Chisinau boiler.

          And where is the 44th in the film?
  • Nikolaevich I April 14 2020 10: 42 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In recent years, I don’t watch “Russian” films at all ... Sometimes I tried ... according to “recommendations” (!), But it happened that I turned it off in the “middle of the film”! I somehow watched f. "Attraction" (the wife and granddaughter twisted their arms and led ...) ... the "absurdities" in the film turned out to be enough for "impressions"! When my wife and granddaughter tried to "drive" me to f. "Invasion", I put up "fierce resistance", and they had to retreat ... Now, "on the telly" they advertise some kind of "Protestant" film ... I just had to "look" at the fragments of the "movie" (animal nkvdeshniki ... inhuman camp conditions, all in the "spirit" of Solzhenitsyn!) to decide that I will not watch this film!
  • o_zotov April 14 2020 10: 55 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    It's a strange thing, you look at the Soviet “At war as at war”, “Only old people go into battle” or “Baltic sky” and believe in what is happening on the screen. And you do not just believe, but live along with the characters on the screen.


    Those who caught the war, whose young parents fought, left the cinema. Remained Mikhalkovskie fosterlings extra chromosomal medina. What to expect from them?
  • Olddetractor April 14 2020 11: 02 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: Prometey
    Yes, and in Soviet films there were enough tricks.
    "Ati-bats, soldiers were coming"

    The prototype was a platoon of Lieutenant Shironin, who defended the railway crossing near the village of Taranovka in the Kharkov region in March 1943. All platoon fighters and the commander were awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union. The film is of course an art
  • Trapperxnumx April 14 2020 11: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And from childhood I remembered the book "A Man Doesn’t Surrender" where a young political instructor finds himself on the eve of the war in the border part and then removes the soldier from the encirclement. That's where the heroism is! It is still under the impression - as if he himself was walking through the Belarusian forests to Berezina.
  • Fitter65 April 14 2020 11: 36 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    In modern Russian military films, with the possible exception of a few (“28 Panfilovites” or “Brest Fortress”), there is no truth about that great war.
    Still there is a good movie "STAR", my granddaughters watched it several times, at that time all the artists were normal people (I'm talking about A. Panin)
    1. begemot20091 April 18 2020 19: 47 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Awesome shit. And how do you remember it? Panin was normal. Probably, somewhere far away they shot and they couldn’t run for a bottle. Is he actually an artist? I had the opinion that this fool from a psychiatric hospital was released for hype, and then his directors noticed: but mine and ... Well, the yoke into the movie.
  • Grandfather Crimea April 14 2020 12: 05 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The topic raised is relevant. I immediately remembered the phrase about one director-actor (the youngest)))) "Fedya, where are the boobs ?!" Zadolbal Bondarchuk Jr. is seen by many that so walked on it ....
    The phenomenon is probably that the wrong people go to art, there are possibly talented ones, but only scum find sponsors (like themselves) and create “masterpieces”. Worship of everything Western, deviation from the norm (both in thinking and sex - role), perversity of nature and stupidity, wretchedness pretending to be insider and creatism - can create something that people eat and eat ((((((It's a shame, however, ((
  • Ruby April 14 2020 12: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    My aunt’s husband walked from Kursk to Berlin. I could not watch films about the war, and I always said that there was no truth at all from the word at all. And he was talking about Soviet films, and as far as I know, many front-line soldiers had such an attitude to cinema. This is the question of generations. Today's youth has a completely different story and teaches and perceives. Give them a hype. Here are the directors and try. They need a cash register first of all, they don't give a damn about the rest.