Military Review

Putin’s “brilliant operation” oil deal called in comments in the press of Poland

227

The press around the world is discussing a new deal OPEC +. Recall that on the basis of this transaction, the countries that are the largest oil producers have given each other obligations to reduce production volumes.


The new deal is often called OPEC ++, as not only OPEC + participants, but also the USA, Canada, Argentina, Colombia and some other countries have agreed to reduce oil production. The share of those who were not originally part of the OPEC + agreement provides for reduction volumes of about 5 million barrels per day.

Mexico joined the agreement, which the parties to the deal had to "persuade" longer than others. The Mexican share accounts for 100 thousand barrels of reduction per day. For comparison: in the USA - up to 2 million barrels. It was the United States that promised "to take on a substantial share of Mexican volumes," so that Mexico would also support the new agreement.

New oil deals have provoked a different reaction in the world. In most cases, experts agree that this agreement will stabilize the market. It is expected that during the year, the price of oil may rise above $ 40 (for a barrel of Brent brand). Currently (7:30 Moscow time), the price of a barrel of oil of the mentioned brand is at around $ 32,8. That is, an abrupt increase in prices, as some experts predicted, did not happen.

The reaction of some Polish media and their readers to the news of a new oil deal drew attention. So, the publication Wirtualna Polska in the Money.pl section usually suggests readers to mark this or that “like” or “dislike” news Online. And the news about the OPEC + (OPEC ++) deal gained dislikes ten times the number of likes (currently 118 vs. 17).

Putin’s “brilliant operation” oil deal called in comments in the press of Poland


In the comments, the deal itself was even called a "conspiracy." And one of the commentators called the deal "Putin’s brilliant operation," adding:

Trump is in his pocket. Two more months, and there will be no sanctions, you will see.

It was previously noted that “Moscow managed to force Washington” for the first time in stories join the deal to reduce hydrocarbon production.

Another user is confident that "OPEC is the largest mafia in the world." At the same time, he was reminded that neither the United States, nor Russia, nor a number of other major players in the oil market belong to OPEC.

Recall that earlier Donald Trump thanked Vladimir Putin for the fact that Russia ultimately supported the agreement to reduce oil production.

Experts agree that today's low oil prices can be beneficial, for example, to India and China.
227 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. seti
    seti April 13 2020 07: 59 New
    22
    In general, all oligarchs and transnational corporations are in the black. Only ordinary consumers are in the red
    1. xvot
      xvot April 13 2020 08: 08 New
      15
      why, lovers of poning are also in the black
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent April 13 2020 08: 23 New
        -5
        Trump is in his pocket. Two more months, and there will be no sanctions, you will see.

        And there you look and the United States will not repeat

        Norwegian Nostradamus 20 years ago predicted the collapse of the United States by the end of 2020 what

        The web discusses the forecast of Johan Galtung, who predicted the collapse of the USSR and the September 11 attack.

        In 1980, the Norwegian participated in a scientific conference in Moscow and shocked everyone, saying that in 10 years the Berlin Wall would fall, and after that the USSR would disappear. Moscow then did not pay attention to the predictions of the Norwegian. And the West, on the contrary, was inspired by prophecy and intensified subversive work against the USSR. The professor, incidentally, predicted the unrest in Tiananmen Square in China in 1989 and the blow to the twin towers in 2001.

        Later in the early 2000s, Galtung said that America would generally fall, die as an empire. The fall, according to his forecast, will begin with Pax Americana starting in 2020, and by 2025 it will completely lose its superpower status. However, the loss of US international authority will be accompanied by a "rise in fascist sentiment", which we are already witnessing in the international arena.

        After Donald Trump came to power in the States in 2016, the Norwegian scientist suggested that the new president would only hasten the collapse of the American empire. Galtung outlined preliminary considerations on this subject in a 2004 article, On the Coming Decline and Fall of the US Empire. He identified 14 major contradictions in American society.


        The whole article is here: https://therussiantimes.com/nauka/392132.html (TheRussianTimes)
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 April 13 2020 08: 30 New
          26
          А one of the commentators called the deal "Putin’s brilliant operation"

          Well then! Only one? And there are many of us at VO! Nevertheless, the largest Russian oil company believes quite the opposite. Verbatim:

          When asked whether Russia would pay an adequate price by agreeing to cut production by 2,5 million barrels per day, Fedun compared the deal with "Brest peace"which was humiliating for Russia, but necessary.
          1. Vladimir16
            Vladimir16 April 13 2020 08: 51 New
            10
            Quote: Stas157
            ... in the largest Russian oil company they think quite the opposite ...

            What does Fedun have to do with Russia's largest oil company?
            This fatliquoring element in Lukoil changes oil for bucks.
            Lukoil has nothing to do with the largest oil company.
            it's a burp of the nineties.
            It’s a pity that they didn’t cover in the place with Yukos.
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 April 13 2020 08: 56 New
              26
              Quote: Vladimir16
              Lukoil has nothing to do with the largest oil company.

              What are you! And maybe the largest private (without government participation) oil company?

              For reference, Lukoil:
              The second company after Gazprom in terms of revenue in Russia (according to the results of 2014, according to Expert magazine) [7]. Until 2007, it was the largest oil company in Russia in terms of production (Rosneft was ahead of it after the purchase of Yukos assets) [8]. By the size of proved hydrocarbon reserves, Lukoil, according to its own data, as of January 1, 2011 was third in the world private oil company (oil reserves - the first)
              1. Vladimir16
                Vladimir16 April 13 2020 09: 04 New
                10
                Well, you spun, spun already. laughing

                here are your words
                Quote: Stas157
                in the largest Russian oil company consider


                It was to these words that I answered you.

                Quote: Stas157
                And to the largest private (without state participation) oil company

                and I will answer it.

                If not government contracts, then this company would have died long ago.
                Many city municipalities have contracts with Lukoil.
                In other words, state money is being poured into the Lukoil cash desk.
                So, this company cannot do without state participation.

                My opinion is that all energy should belong to the state.
                Moreover, it was the state that created what was later called this oil as a result of fraud.
                1. Stas157
                  Stas157 April 13 2020 09: 14 New
                  12
                  Quote: Vladimir16
                  Well, you spun, spun already.

                  And you do not take the topic aside. Why arrange a debate about how large is the largest private (especially for you) oil company Lukoil?

                  Regarding Putin's "brilliant" operation:

                  An agreement of 10 million barrels per day, which marked the Kremlin’s surrender in the “oil war with Riyadh,” requires Russia to remove 2,7 million barrels of daily supplies from the market. This is twice the quota of Saudi Arabia, which will be 1,3 million barrels per day (compared to March).

                  Such a strong reduction in production is devastating for the budget, especially during the coronavirus pandemic:
                  The Russian economy in April-June 2020 may fall by 18%, and real incomes of Russians - by 17,5%, the VEB.RF Research Institute predicts.
                  1. Vladimir16
                    Vladimir16 April 13 2020 09: 18 New
                    -17
                    Quote: Stas157
                    And you do not take the topic aside. Why arrange a debate about how large is the largest private (especially for you)

                    What do you spin the hedgehog.
                    Especially for you, your words
                    Quote: Stas157
                    Nevertheless, the largest Russian oil company believes


                    Meaningless dialogue.
                    He screwed up, and now you come back and you begin to teach me here.

                    You still seemed to the moderator that you were misunderstood and how the kitten was poked, humiliated.

                    No sim conversation is over.
                    Be happy. love
                    .
                    1. Stas157
                      Stas157 April 13 2020 09: 26 New
                      12
                      Quote: Vladimir16
                      What do you spin the hedgehog.

                      Quote: Vladimir16
                      Screwed up

                      Quote: Vladimir16
                      like a kitten poked his nose humiliated

                      Why are you so worried? Do not worry. No need to take everything so keenly! Everyone sees only your aggressive desire to somehow humiliate the interlocutor. Trying in vain. I do not accept your insults at my own expense.
                      1. Serg89
                        Serg89 April 14 2020 20: 26 New
                        0
                        He cites the example of private traders as an argument, and then swim and change shoes. Why are you there? Private traders will say that the deal is bad, they lose profit, the purpose of which is the existence of the corporation, the US shale companies also say, let’s pull their arguments here, why not, what’s the difference with the example of the private company Lukoil in which The main beneficiary is one oligarch and a couple of oligarch funds. Circus, in fact, this feint does not look at Russia's losses in production and made OPEC not only Russia and a couple of CIS countries, but the whole world !!! Therefore, there will be no lovers of freebies to get into the markets from now on, whether you remove or do not remove the sanctions from the producers - now you simply will not break into the market with your oil, who would not start production.
                  2. major147
                    major147 April 13 2020 16: 02 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Stas157
                    Regarding Putin's "brilliant" operation:

                    An agreement of 10 million barrels per day, which marked the Kremlin’s surrender in the “oil war with Riyadh,” requires Russia to remove 2,7 million barrels of daily supplies from the market. This is twice the quota of Saudi Arabia, which will be 1,3 million barrels per day (compared to March).

                    The point of increasing production if there is nowhere to sell? That's why everyone "poduzhilis". Some are more, some are smaller for each of their own sales markets.
                    1. Paranoid50
                      Paranoid50 April 13 2020 23: 07 New
                      +3
                      Quote: major147
                      The point of increasing production if there is nowhere to sell?

                      And they did understand this:
                      Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait agreed to voluntarily reduce oil supplies by another 2 million barrels per day, said Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Zangane.
                      “At the meeting, the Saudi Minister of Energy announced that the kingdom, together with Kuwait and the UAE, agreed to voluntarily reduce oil supplies by another 2 million barrels per day to help oil prices in the market,” RIA Novosti quotes Iran’s oil minister.
                      UAE Energy Minister Suheil al-Mazrui, in turn, said that the country agrees to reduce production from the level of 4,1 million barrels per day.

                2. WIKI
                  WIKI April 13 2020 11: 59 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Vladimir16
                  If not government contracts, then this company would have died long ago.

                  Bare words. For example, at the end of 2018, the company's debt amounted to $ 435 million, and only 28 million rubles. And most of the dollar debt is its own bonds. Https: //www.conomy.ru/emitent/lukoil/lkoh-dolg
                3. Spring fluff
                  Spring fluff April 13 2020 20: 25 New
                  0
                  But what’s the energy there, let’s go right away - store money in a savings bank, fly Aeroflot planes, eat in a public catering. How it ended we know
            2. Sergey39
              Sergey39 April 13 2020 11: 05 New
              -1
              Quote: Vladimir16
              It’s a pity that they didn’t cover in the place with Yukos.

              So after all, they will cover Lukoil. Under the guise of a coronavirus. Optimize.
              1. kjhg
                kjhg April 13 2020 12: 05 New
                0
                Quote: Sergey39

                So after all, they will cover Lukoil. Under the guise of a coronavirus. Optimize.

                Was the overcoat matured for this? In response to this, Putin’s partners can also cover up for someone who needs it. What, have you already forgotten the humiliation with Rusal? Some kind of memory you have is very short.
                1. primaala
                  primaala April 13 2020 15: 41 New
                  +3
                  Quote: kjhg
                  Quote: Sergey39

                  So after all, they will cover Lukoil. Under the guise of a coronavirus. Optimize.

                  Was the overcoat matured for this? In response to this, Putin’s partners can also cover up for someone who needs it. What, have you already forgotten the humiliation with Rusal? Some kind of memory you have is very short.

                  Vagit Alekperov was born in the village of Stepan Razin near Baku.
                  Having left his native republic, Vagit Alekperov went to the Surgutneftegaz enterprise.
                  In 1983, Vagit Yusufovich Alekperov headed the Povkhneft oil and gas production department of the Bashneft production association.
                  Alekperov earned the nickname "Alec the First." In this case, it is alleged that the head of the oil department was awarded this title due to his heroic accomplishments.
                  In particular, Alekperov "allegedly" sat down on the burst pipe so that the repairmen could overcome their fear of a possible explosion and get down to work. (storyteller).
                  In 1985, Vagit Alekperov was already appointed Bashneft’s first deputy general director for Western Siberia, and two years later he turned out to be the head of the Kogalymneftegaz production association.
                  Naturally, Alekperov could not occupy such large positions in the oil and gas industry without a "correctly" built career and establishing the necessary connections. At that time, he closely knew all the leaders of the Siberian oil companies, and with some of them he subsequently organized a business.
                  Kogalym’s indicators grew not only production, but also the quality of life of the population, which for the most part worked at Kogalymneftegaz. As a result, Alekperov was invited to Moscow, where he was waiting for the chair of the deputy \ minister of oil / gas industry of the USSR.
                  This appointment was unexpected. Many could not understand who contributed to this promotion of "Alec the First" !? Indeed, right up to the coming to power of VVP, Kogalym was under the "heel" of the Chechen diaspora. There were rumors that the "oilman" of Azerbaijani blood was a relative of Heydar Aliyev.
                  In 1990, British Petroleum organized a visit by a group of Soviet oil workers to the UK. Vagit Alekperov was engaged in the selection of the composition of the delegation, and naturally he appointed himself as its head. During the visit, the Soviet deputy minister closely studied the experience of creating a vertically integrated oil company that would be engaged in the exploration, production, refining and sale of oil.
                  With the union, all these tasks were carried out separately from each other. Perhaps even then, Vagit Alekperov was thinking about creating a private oil company, since, despite the fact that the Soviet Union still existed, on the sidelines of the authorities, many were already beginning to share his property.
                  PS To be continued ... as well as the consequence of the vertical fraudsters, about the looting of the state property. Tobish - resources.
              2. Andobor
                Andobor April 13 2020 14: 56 New
                +1
                Quote: Sergey39
                So after all, they will cover Lukoil. Under the guise of a coronavirus. Optimize.

                - They are nationalizing, because Fedun is panicking.
            3. primaala
              primaala April 13 2020 12: 56 New
              -2
              Quote: Vladimir16
              Quote: Stas157
              ... in the largest Russian oil company they think quite the opposite ...

              What does Fedun have to do with Russia's largest oil company?
              This fatliquoring element in Lukoil changes oil for bucks.
              Lukoil has nothing to do with the largest oil company.
              it's a burp of the nineties.
              It’s a pity that they didn’t cover in the place with Yukos.

              A thousand times ready to put PLUS !!!
              How are you RIGHT, Vladimir. good
            4. ccsr
              ccsr April 13 2020 13: 31 New
              +1
              Quote: Vladimir16
              It’s a pity that they didn’t cover in the place with Yukos.

              Alekperov turned out to be more cunning than Khodorkovsky - this is what the old hardened Soviet apparatchik and fledgling Komsomol member of the times of perestroika, who decided to subjugate power, mean. The result is logical - Putin accepts Alekperov and gives him carte blanche for the future, while Khodorkovsky is still trying to teach us from abroad at his own expense. As they say - "Shakespeare is resting ..."
            5. vadim dok
              vadim dok April 13 2020 16: 28 New
              +5
              You take an interest (Google to help you) how much Lukoil pays to the state than ROSNEFT! And this despite the fact that Lukoil is 2 times less in volume!
          2. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 April 13 2020 09: 01 New
            10
            Earlier it was noted that "Moscow managed to force Washington" for the first time in history to join a deal to reduce hydrocarbon production.

            What kind of medicine are respected commentators taking when diligently pouring out their bile on Putin's actions? They all fail to realize that the main achievement in this "conspiracy" is that the US was forced to agree to a reduction in its oil production. Not only that, they took on a share of Mexico's production cuts. Thus, Putin and Salman secured their countries from the loss of the emerging oil markets, which previously successfully replaced the Americans with their shale oil. Previously, the United States did not under any circumstances reduce its production. But now it seems they have no other choice, otherwise Trump would not have made this cut. He was smoothly led to this by Putin and Prince Salman. I think the spectacle they skillfully put on had a positive effect on Trump's decision.
            1. Kronos
              Kronos April 13 2020 10: 30 New
              +4
              There is no mechanism to force the US to do this
              1. SRC P-15
                SRC P-15 April 13 2020 10: 41 New
                +2
                Quote: Kronos
                There is no mechanism to force the US to do this

                There is no mechanism, but there is a deal! yes
                1. major147
                  major147 April 13 2020 16: 05 New
                  +1
                  Quote: SRC P-15
                  Quote: Kronos
                  There is no mechanism to force the US to do this

                  There is no mechanism, but there is a deal! yes

                  There is a deal, but will those who join the OPEC + format comply with the agreement? History says the opposite.
                2. Willywonka
                  Willywonka April 14 2020 08: 54 New
                  +1
                  So where is the US in this deal? Maybe they didn’t make out? As for the Mexican quota of 0.3 million bar. - This is a dead poultice. The most important thing is that the Saudis do not throw prices, that is, they will continue to throw them off for Europe and at what discount should Urals be sold then?
              2. Gost2012
                Gost2012 April 13 2020 10: 48 New
                +5
                Quote: Kronos
                There is no mechanism to force the US to do this

                During the bidding process they always say something, silent bidding does not occur laughing
                Not so long ago (comparatively on a historical scale)), permission was given to export oil from the United States, before that there was no export at all. So they have everything, if not, they will. They signed up for the deal, the question is how they will execute. They will not - it means everything from the beginning.
            2. unaha
              unaha April 13 2020 10: 51 New
              +1
              Took ... in words. Well, as the United States abides by the agreements they are not profitable, probably there is no need to remember.
              1. SRC P-15
                SRC P-15 April 13 2020 10: 58 New
                -4
                Quote: unaha
                Took ... in words. Well, as the United States abides by the agreements they are not profitable, probably there is no need to remember.

                "Where will they go from the submarine?" yes "If they refuse - turn off the gas!" wassat As a visitor under the nickname "Gost2012" said in his comment above, when the US kicks up, we can repeat this "spectacle" over and over again until the entire US shale industry dies.
                1. unaha
                  unaha April 13 2020 11: 04 New
                  +7
                  Even so, but won't our economy (in the region of its half) be ordered to live while the United States “falls off” only shale production?
                  Are you not a fan of King Pierre’s strategy? )))
                  1. SRC P-15
                    SRC P-15 April 13 2020 11: 12 New
                    +1
                    Quote: unaha
                    Even so, but won't our economy (in the region of its half) be ordered to live while the United States “falls off” only shale production?

                    Will only shale mining "fall off"? Why then did Trump agree to this agreement if this shale production, as you said, is "just"? Maybe hundreds of thousands of jobs of bankrupt oil shale producers are hidden behind this?
                    And let Trump enjoy the Pyrrhic victory after the imposition of sanctions against Nord Stream 2. Didn't it come back to haunt him?
                    1. unaha
                      unaha April 13 2020 11: 23 New
                      +2
                      "So why did Trump agree to this agreement if this shale production is, as you said, 'just'? Maybe hundreds of thousands of jobs of bankrupt shale producers are hiding behind this?"
                      Of course, that's why. He still has to be elected for a new term))). However, for the US economy as a whole, the shale industry is quite modest in its share, in contrast to the share of raw materials in ours.
                      1. SRC P-15
                        SRC P-15 April 13 2020 11: 46 New
                        +3
                        Quote: unaha
                        However, for the US economy as a whole, the shale industry is quite modest in its share, in contrast to the share of raw materials in ours.

                        If this were so, then the United States would not fight OPEC and Russia, but simply bought cheap oil abroad without paying attention to the collapse of its shale production. But they are desperately fighting for it, moreover, not long before that, their billions of billions of dollars were restructured by the shale mining companies. The modest part say ..., well, well.
                2. Malyuta
                  Malyuta April 13 2020 11: 08 New
                  12
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  we can repeat this "performance" over and over until the entire US shale industry dies.

                  If you repeat this "performance", then you will have nothing to pay your pension. hi
                  1. SRC P-15
                    SRC P-15 April 13 2020 11: 16 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Malyuta
                    If you repeat this "performance", then you will have nothing to pay your pension.

                    I think Trump is enough and once: if you do not understand, you can just recall the name of this performance. That’s enough.
                    1. Malyuta
                      Malyuta April 13 2020 11: 26 New
                      +9
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      I think Trump is enough and once, if you do not understand, you can just recall the name of this performance. That’s enough.

                      In our town, Myvsevraisk, they have not yet reported that trampnash.
                      But seriously, I recommend that you speculate on how the vassal saudit plots intrigue against his overlord, whose army provides this very oil production. In this context, I recall one of the theories of the collapse of the USSR, the reduction of oil prices by the Saudis. Can you put a = sign between the power of the USSR and the current Russian Federation? hi
                      1. SRC P-15
                        SRC P-15 April 13 2020 11: 35 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        as a vassal, the Saudis intrigues against his overlord, whose army provides this very oil production.

                        We saw how this suzerain ensures the protection of oil production after the attack on the oil-techranilish SA. Their vaunted "patriots" didn't even budge.
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        In this context, I recall one of the theories of the collapse of the USSR, the reduction of oil prices by the Saudis. Can you put a = sign between the power of the USSR and the current Russian Federation?

                        Well, oil has been dropped now - more than in the USSR - to negative quotes. So what happened? Who was the first to shout the guard?
                      2. Range
                        Range April 13 2020 14: 30 New
                        -1
                        Well, oil has been dropped now - more than in the USSR - to negative quotes. So what happened? Who first shouted the guard? [/ Quote]

                        USA.
                  2. Polite Moose
                    Polite Moose April 13 2020 13: 20 New
                    +3
                    Quote: СРЦ П-15
                    I think Trump is enough and once: if you do not understand, you can just recall the name of this performance. That’s enough.

                    I share your opinion that the oil war between the SA and the Russian Federation is a spectacle. If the SA really brought down the world oil prices in spite of us, then in order to return everything back and even more, we would not need to do practically anything. It would be necessary and sufficient to deliver some money or weapons, 200-300 kg, to the Yemeni comrades. Chinese UAVs, 20-30 RGD-5, 3-4 pack camels. And kirdyk "Vaska's cat" (Saudi oil refining and oil production). At the same time, they would have mocked the Petriets again. However, no such steps (very simple and very cheap) have been taken. They preferred to pour the whole world with free oil and print the notorious egg-capsule. So the enemy was not the Saudis. As a result, one more + was added to OPEC.
                    1. Sergey39
                      Sergey39 April 13 2020 15: 18 New
                      +1
                      That this performance was immediately visible, but not visible to everyone. Financial bigwigs from Washington yawned and are now reaping the fruits of their insanity.
                3. major147
                  major147 April 13 2020 16: 11 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Malyuta
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  we can repeat this "performance" over and over until the entire US shale industry dies.

                  If you repeat this "performance", then you will have nothing to pay your pension. hi

                  I agree with all the disputants, but on my own I will say with a proverb: "Wherever you throw, everywhere there is a wedge", but! “They choose the lesser of two evils,” and I see the lesser the struggle with the “shale producers” for the sales market. And in general, teeth should be shown more often, otherwise they will score unrequited sanctions.
              2. Willywonka
                Willywonka April 14 2020 08: 56 New
                0
                What are you turning off there? The United States is now the leader in the supply of LNG to Europe. Suddenly? "Repeat the Spectrum over and over again"? And trolls will pay with what salary? Have you thought?
                1. SRC P-15
                  SRC P-15 April 14 2020 15: 20 New
                  0
                  Quote: WillyWonka
                  Why are you disconnecting there? The United States is now the leader in LNG supplies to Europe. Suddenly?

                  But do not tell me: Whose U.S. LNG is supplied to Europe? Recall how they buy Russian liquefied natural gas and resell it as their own (but already more expensive) European countries? But Russia does not lose anything on this - it receives its money. Suddenly? bully
                2. Simara
                  Simara April 15 2020 05: 30 New
                  0
                  Maybe leaders ... but what’s the share of LNG in consumption?))) And how much gas does Europe consume from the pipe? We also know how to twist facts. For example, the highest consumption of seafood in the Russian Federation, in the north, but no one runs there from the south with the words I want to live there and have whales)
          3. dvb
            dvb April 13 2020 11: 15 New
            +1
            Totally agree
          4. Sardanapalus
            Sardanapalus April 13 2020 11: 32 New
            -2
            How many Americans have reduced: 0,2 million, so they were forced to cut at such a price, there will remain large liquid shales and will continue to reduce the cost of the technology, only on a grand scale and more powerful.
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 April 13 2020 11: 51 New
              +2
              Quote: Sardanapalus
              How many Americans have reduced: 0,2 million, so at this price they had to cut,

              They didn’t cut anything! In connection with the fall in oil prices and the ruin of shale oil, their production has already fallen to 2 million barrels. And the Americans still took over Mexico’s share, if only to reach an agreement and raise the price of oil. What is it for?
              1. Sardanapalus
                Sardanapalus April 13 2020 14: 05 New
                0
                Well, I'm talking about that to you and I'm talking about the production fell from the Americans, not because of the agreement, but for the price. As soon as the oil settles over 50, they will come out again. For several years, the author correctly predicted: "The era of expensive oil is over for our generation forever."
              2. Andobor
                Andobor April 13 2020 15: 19 New
                -2
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                What is it for?

                By the election, the shale can no longer be saved, Texas and Oklahoma need to be saved.
              3. Willywonka
                Willywonka April 14 2020 08: 57 New
                0
                This is a market, my friend, a free pancake market.
          5. artifact
            artifact April 13 2020 14: 16 New
            +1
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            I think the play that they skillfully played has had a positive effect on Trump's decision.

            used Trump's tactics "to raise rates and then move to previously prepared positions"
          6. Deck
            Deck April 13 2020 15: 00 New
            -3
            What kind of medicine are respected commentators taking when diligently pouring out their bile on Putin's actions? They all fail to realize that the main achievement in this "conspiracy" is that the US was forced to agree to a reduction in its oil production.


            The main result of this ingenious plan was the dollar at 80 rubles.
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 April 13 2020 15: 13 New
              -1
              Quote: Deck
              The main result of this ingenious plan was the dollar at 80 rubles.

              The ruble will grow back, but oil is unlikely to cost $ 60 per barrel, which were very convenient for the US shale.
              By the way: the dollar is already worth about 73 rubles.
              1. Deck
                Deck April 13 2020 18: 45 New
                -3
                oil is unlikely to cost $ 60 per barrel, which was very convenient for US shale


                This is victory! Fuck with him that the budget will not receive tens of billions of dollars. Fuck with him that the ruble has fallen in price by 25%. US shales will experience inconvenience. Just a breakthrough!
                1. SRC P-15
                  SRC P-15 April 13 2020 19: 02 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Deck
                  This is victory! Fuck with him that the budget will not receive tens of billions of dollars. Fuck with him that the ruble has fallen in price by 25%. US shales will experience inconvenience. Just a breakthrough!

                  The budget would not have received these "tens of billions of dollars" anyway: if we had agreed to cut production back in March, and the United States had remained on the sidelines, it would have been they who would have increased the supply of oil to the vacated markets. And the profit would be increased by the United States, not Russia and the CA. This is where your money, supposedly lost by our budget, would go! Precisely to prevent this from happening, Putin and the prince started this show with the collapse of the oil price. Now the United States, against its will, had to get into the boat, which was intensively rocked by Russia and the SA. Only the helmsman in this boat will obviously not be the USA,
                  1. Willywonka
                    Willywonka April 14 2020 09: 03 New
                    0
                    Why wouldn’t I get it anyway? The price would have dropped, but not so much. US supplies would not have increased. At that moment, they filled in strategic reserves, that is, they bought oil at a cheap price.
                2. Igor Aviator
                  Igor Aviator April 13 2020 21: 28 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Deck
                  This is victory! Fuck with him that the budget will not receive tens of billions of dollars.

                  let it be known to you, the budget is being imposed IN RUBLES! In other words, the ruble exchange rate, at a certain cost of oil, is associated with the fullness of the budget by the REVERSE dependence (arithmetic course, 2nd grade of Soviet elementary school). lol
                  1. Deck
                    Deck April 14 2020 06: 22 New
                    -3
                    connected with the fullness of the budget


                    Wallets of our people with a direct dependence. Since the age of 14, the ruble has been falling, people have less and less money. But you see other sources of funding, isn't it Comrade Major?
          7. Andobor
            Andobor April 13 2020 15: 04 New
            -1
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            What kind of medicine do respected commentators take, diligently pouring out their bile on Putin’s actions?

            This is money - no one has canceled the information war, and here the mass of the Internet military hangs around.
            1. Igor Aviator
              Igor Aviator April 13 2020 21: 29 New
              +2
              Quote: Andobor
              no one has canceled the information war, and here the mass of the Internet military hangs around.

              Judging by how they howled, then everything was done CORRECTLY !!
              1. Andobor
                Andobor April 13 2020 21: 32 New
                -1
                Yes, hired Spain has intensified.
          8. Alexey Sommer
            Alexey Sommer April 13 2020 16: 01 New
            +4
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            that the US forced to agree to reduce its oil production

            They are reducing as a result of falling prices, not agreements. They simply are not profitable to mine. As the price rises will start again.
            By the way, the OPEC deal that Russia rejected in March meant a reduction in production for Russia of 0,5 ml barrels per day, now it is already 2,5 ml ..
            Is this a victory for Russia?
          9. Spring fluff
            Spring fluff April 13 2020 20: 30 New
            0
            Are you serious? The United States did not take any (!) Obligations (!) To reduce, unlike us and the Arabs. Read carefully the source. The US said that according to their forecasts (!), Their production by December 2020 itself will decrease by 4 million b / d. The forecast of decline by December is not an obligation to reduce in May.
        2. Range
          Range April 13 2020 14: 20 New
          +5
          These Russophobes got sick! As a person, albeit indirectly, but connected with the oil industry, I declare that all the world's storage facilities are crammed to capacity, and if you do not take any action, then the entire world oil industry will simply stop. Therefore, I reluctantly joined this process, and USAkali - I want to live. The provocation of the Americans and Saudi Arabia turned against them. I remember the words: - "Do you at least understand what you've done?" And now they are trying to write off their shoals on Russia - Stupid! Ten times stupid.
          1. primaala
            primaala April 13 2020 16: 19 New
            -3
            Quote: Spectrum
            These Russophobes got sick! As a person, albeit indirectly, but connected with the oil industry, I declare that all the world's storage facilities are crammed to capacity, and if you do not take any action, then the entire world oil industry will simply stop. Therefore, I reluctantly joined this process, and USAkali - I want to live. The provocation of the Americans and Saudi Arabia turned against them. I remember the words: - "Do you at least understand what you've done?" And now they are trying to write off their shoals on Russia - Stupid! Ten times stupid.

            And that’s right ... !!! Those who work (or worked) in large oil companies will understand your comment.

            good
            1. Willywonka
              Willywonka April 14 2020 09: 06 New
              0
              Comments are for 15 or 20 re or 12 already?
        3. Tank jacket
          Tank jacket April 13 2020 16: 37 New
          -4
          Yes, there will be no LUKOIL, there will be Rosneft, the largest oil company. Rosneft will absorb Lukoil. A kind of nationalization ... They talk a lot.
          1. NKT
            NKT April 13 2020 22: 40 New
            +1
            Surgutneftegas will absorb, everything goes to this.
      2. grandfather_Kostya
        grandfather_Kostya April 13 2020 09: 07 New
        +6
        But I recall that in the mid-90s, our Pavel Globa prophesied that Russia in 2020 would become the most important world power (I cannot guarantee verbosity). I remembered it only because of the sharp contrast of the realities of the 90s with the prediction.
        1. artifact
          artifact April 13 2020 14: 26 New
          +1
          Quote: grandfather_Kostya
          But I recall that in the mid-90s, our Pavel Globa prophesied that Russia in 2020 would become the most important world power (I cannot guarantee verbosity). I remembered it only because of the sharp contrast of the realities of the 90s with the prediction.

          and Vanga also seemed to say that everything would pass, but the glory of Russia and Vladimir would remain. she really said that the straits would remain with us ...
        2. Sergey39
          Sergey39 April 13 2020 15: 22 New
          0
          Yes, it was. I also remember Globa's prediction.
      3. Jarserge
        Jarserge April 14 2020 10: 14 New
        0
        And what did Wang say about this? The opinion of Allan Chumak and Dr. Koshmarovsky is interesting.
    2. Malyuta
      Malyuta April 13 2020 08: 26 New
      +8
      Well, as soon as the opinion of some kind of polka is presented for public discussion, I could also quote my mother-in-law’s statements, but the site’s rules do not allow this, because in her quotes there are no censorship words in the name of the authorities and their paramogue.
      This is the very rare case when I fully support my mother-in-law! good
    3. seti
      seti April 13 2020 08: 37 New
      -17
      Quote: xvot
      why, lovers of poning are also in the black

      Are you a troll about yourself?
      1. Pereira
        Pereira April 13 2020 08: 55 New
        -9
        He is not a fan of pony. On the contrary, he enjoys any news. His life is beautiful and amazing. I envy.
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 April 13 2020 09: 52 New
          -1
          Quote: Pereira
          He is not a fan of pony. On the contrary, he enjoys any news. His life is beautiful and amazing. I envy.

          Accurately noticed! Nevertheless, I want to supplement it. Our cheering patriots, declaring any failure to be Putin’s personal achievement, accusing everyone else of nagging, each time themselves whining about the terrible 90s. This is their starting point for "nenity", after which only victories are possible!))
          1. Pereira
            Pereira April 13 2020 10: 39 New
            -8
            Exactly. In this sense, for me, they are no different from the potter-leg with their zradoperemogami. And they are just as active and noisy.
          2. 16329
            16329 April 13 2020 15: 37 New
            0
            The same applies to your Russophobian left-liberal brotherhood, you regard any successes of modern Russia and Putin as a disaster
            Any agreement other than unconditional surrender is a compromise, any decision in technology and politics is a compromise because there is reality. And of course, the scales of compromise are always tilted in favor of someone else.
            Here a clearly compromise solution has been reached, the oil price has been stabilized in low consumption conditions, the United States, trying to save face as always, pretended that they are simply helping neighboring Mexico, formally not participating in the agreement, the production levels from which the reduction will be made by 2018, namely, the kingdom of CA has significantly increased oil supplies to the market recently, so they will have to reduce more
            Russia will receive normal oil prices in a period of declining consumption, preserve markets, etc.
            So everything looks good
            1. Pereira
              Pereira April 13 2020 18: 44 New
              -1
              DM, about the Russophobian left-liberal fraternity - a finger to the sky.
              Understand that besides liberals and edrissni there is still a people who are for none of them, but for Russia.
              1. sniperino
                sniperino April 13 2020 22: 22 New
                +1
                Quote: Pereira
                in addition to liberalists and edrisni, there is still a people who are for none of them, but for Russia.
                For those at least someone voted. And when they give out someone’s or even their own opinion, if it is, for the voice of the people, then different questions arise ... Is there a personal license for speaking on behalf of the people? Limited or unlimited? By whom is it signed? Etc.
                1. Pereira
                  Pereira April 14 2020 09: 24 New
                  +2
                  Neither grant-eaters nor stealing officials need a third force. Everything is already taken from them.
                  Therefore, when the voice of a person who does not have a Cain seal is heard, a catch phrase is heard from all sides:
                  And who are you, tell me please? - And who are you? “No, who are you, I ask ?!” - And who are you?!

                  Until 1917, the authorities, along with the opposition, also thought that the people had no opinion. And it’s how it turned out ...
                  1. sniperino
                    sniperino April 14 2020 11: 16 New
                    0
                    Quote: Pereira
                    Neither grant-eaters nor stealing officials need a third force ... the voice of a man who does not have the Cain Seal is heard
                    Everyone says so before the first inspection yes All such "criticism" about the economic and political situation in the world of modern Russia against the current government is needed not least by the stealing officials and grant-eaters, and they are composed by them on the money of those who have them and who have Putin scabies. This is definitely not the people of Russia. Some people who call themselves "communists" thoughtlessly take up this discourse, hoping that the main thing is to sweep away the power, and then they will be at the helm and, after public punishment of all grant-eaters and stealing officials, will confidently lead the state to power and prosperity. Free advice to such "communists": change the name of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation to the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), then you will have a clearer idea of ​​your perspective.
                    1. Pereira
                      Pereira April 14 2020 12: 47 New
                      +1
                      One can think of failures in domestic and foreign policy visible only to grant-eaters and thieves. And the people are dark, stupid, see nothing. I somehow communicate more with people. I'm not saying that part of it itself. Neither officials, nor liberdi are among my acquaintances, and their aspirations are not reliably known to me. I can only judge by the result.
                      According to the Communists as a whole, they correctly said, if you do not take into account that this is a full-time nourished opposition. Their discourse is picked up only by ordinary middle-level functionaries, who need to portray vigorous activity in front of the ordinary plebs,
                      providing mass. But the leaders, led by Papa Zyu, somehow keep quiet, for, as I suspect, on the salary.
                    2. sniperino
                      sniperino April 14 2020 14: 36 New
                      0
                      Quote: Pereira
                      One can think of failures in domestic and foreign policy visible only to grant-eaters and thieves. And the people are dark, stupid, see nothing.
                      You can’t think so, because grant-eaters and privatizers need to be given equal places and elevations for failures in order to channel a lot of negativity related to the current tense situation to power, cause internal conflict, unrest and collapse of the power vertical, which today allows maintaining the relative prosperity of society in manual control . Grants are given to lead the country to disintegration, and corrupt officials hope for a good catch in this muddy water.
  2. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor April 13 2020 10: 46 New
    +2
    lovers poke
    always in the black, they are like the same macarque, always unhappy.
  3. NEOZ
    NEOZ April 13 2020 11: 41 New
    +1
    Quote: xvot
    why, lovers of poning are also in the black

    ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    cons whiners instructed !!!!!!!!!
  4. Blondy
    Blondy April 13 2020 15: 49 New
    +1
    All this is tasteful: the Poles call the results brilliant, but Fedun, the local oligarch from Lukoil, considers the deal to be humiliating. And finally: hell with us, Russia is Sechin.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. Mastodon
    Mastodon April 13 2020 16: 05 New
    -1
    Quote: xvot
    why, lovers of poning are also in the black

    laughing good To the point, well done!
  6. sniperino
    sniperino April 13 2020 22: 46 New
    0
    Quote: xvot
    lovers ponyat also in plus
    Rather, they are not lovers, but pros, and the pros they need are not measured on cardboard epaulets, but are worth something ...
  • Blackmokona
    Blackmokona April 13 2020 08: 16 New
    +1
    99% of oligarchs and TNCs are in the red, because they are buyers of oil, not sellers. Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Ford, GM and others from rising oil prices are just expenses
  • Deniska999
    Deniska999 April 13 2020 08: 18 New
    13
    Administration of VO, have you really gone so far in trying to justify any action by the president that you publish comments from faceless users as an expert opinion?
    1. Alexander S.
      Alexander S. April 13 2020 09: 59 New
      +3
      but any opinion against the president is considered expert and suitable.
  • knn54
    knn54 April 13 2020 08: 47 New
    +3
    Something the Yankees will stir up with Mexico, and do not go to the grandmother.
    1. unaha
      unaha April 13 2020 10: 53 New
      -2
      And what is there to stir up ... They will force them to reduce production on the Mexican shelf, and shale will be kept or increased.
      1. Range
        Range April 13 2020 17: 55 New
        +1
        This is called "Fig to you". Even if everyone, including the US potassium, stops production, this will not save shale producers, since the oil price will not rise. USAkaliya and its satellite Saudi Arabia made a fatal mistake and now even 80 greens per barrel will not save the Arabs and the empire of lies (USA). The price will not rise above 35 Baku ones, even if the Americans do their best to bunch up. Coronovirus to help them.
        1. unaha
          unaha April 13 2020 20: 18 New
          0
          It is likely that the price will not increase significantly. but for whom is this a bigger problem? For the United States with a share of oil and gas in the economy of about 6% or the Russian Federation with a share of about 30%?
          1. Range
            Range April 13 2020 20: 45 New
            +1
            I understand that the bag is more visible, but what year is it? Or is the figure just taken from the ceiling?
            1. unaha
              unaha April 14 2020 07: 42 New
              -1
              If you have other indicators - please.
              I focus on the data of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation for 2018. The graphs clearly show that the share of oil and gas revenues in our country has been constantly growing for the past 15 years.
              1. Range
                Range April 16 2020 21: 08 New
                +1
                If you look at the green papers, then yes (and most of them are refined petroleum products, gas is the final product and cannot be considered as raw materials), but if in material terms, it is 17%, or even less. And of these 17%, two-thirds is already a product of deep processing. Raw takes a tiny fraction. Therefore, before tra-la-la, make inquiries with oil workers, and not in the Internet garbage dump, where the water is muddied with Shakaliya - Empire of Lies.
                1. unaha
                  unaha April 17 2020 07: 31 New
                  -1
                  In 2019, oil export from Russia amounted to 267,5 million tons, an increase of 2,7% or 6,9 million tons by 2018. This is a new historic high (for the second year in a row); for comparison, the highest indicator of the USSR is 144 million tons in 1988.

                  In pure form, in 2019, about 48% of the oil produced was exported, which became the highest indicator for the last 8 years (at its peak in 2004, it exceeded 56%). When considering the total amount of oil and oil products, the export orientation is almost 76%; it has been at this level since the mid-2000s. (2015 maximum is 78,3%).

                  Is it in the "papers"?
                  1. Range
                    Range April 17 2020 09: 50 New
                    +1
                    Gasoil (a product of oil refining) is no longer oil and there is no need to start cancer for a stone. It’s about gas oil and NFC on the Internet that the followers of the liberda so veiled under oil that if a person is not in the topic, then so many noodles are hung on the ears that it will take more than one month, or maybe a year. In search engines you will find real data somewhere on the 20th or more pages.
                  2. Range
                    Range April 17 2020 10: 08 New
                    +1
                    For the gifted. Oil refining products:
                    - road surface;
                    - rubber, paints, varnishes and solvents;
                    - fuel, lubricants, oils;
                    - cosmetics, detergents;
                    - food (yes, yes there is such a chip);
                    - pesticides;
                    - medicines;
                    - explosives.
                    This is all included in your 48%. Although this figure is adjusted by cheaters from the penguinostan.
                    1. unaha
                      unaha April 17 2020 13: 55 New
                      -1
                      Well ... Then, too, for the gifted - indicators of the export of oil raw materials were indicated above. https://minenergo.gov.ru/node/1210

                      Regarding OIL PRODUCTS

                      "The export of petroleum products (in the standard sense - the position of TNVED 2710) in 2019 amounted to 142,8 million tons, having decreased by 5% or 7,5 million tons by 2018. This is the lowest figure since 2013 (maximum of 2015 - 171,7 million tons), but significantly more than in previous years.
                      Some of the petroleum products, such as bitumen, coke, waxes, benzene and similar "aromatics", etc., are classified in foreign trade statistics separately from the bulk. "
                    2. Range
                      Range April 17 2020 14: 08 New
                      +1
                      What is included in the concept of petroleum products, I described in the comments above before your last outpouring. Do not be like a liberde. According to your link, the export of pure oil as of March 2020 amounted to 20,8 million tons.
                  3. unaha
                    unaha April 17 2020 13: 56 New
                    -1
                    And I don’t see your NUMBERS, only demagogy.
                  4. Range
                    Range April 17 2020 16: 19 New
                    +1
                    You are comparing data between extracted and refined oil, which do not say anything. Only that of the total number of crude oil produced is 48%, the rest is oil products. And these 48% then what can they say? By the way, on the website you have indicated and in your chart, data for 2010. And since 2016, there is no processing data at all. So who is the demagogue?
        2. unaha
          unaha April 14 2020 08: 34 New
          -1
          "Out of the bag" - the use of derogatory expressions in relation to the opponent, is this a distinctive feature of the adherents of the current leadership of the state?
    2. dog of war
      dog of war April 13 2020 21: 01 New
      0
      So what is good for Russia if the price does not rise above $ 35? Russia is an oil exporter, not an importer.
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 April 14 2020 10: 05 New
        0
        Quote: War Dog
        So what is good for Russia if the price does not rise above $ 35? Russia is an oil exporter, not an importer.

        Russia is a conflict between exporters and industrialists. Exporters have almost strangled manufacturers. And then there is a chance that there will be a need to survive ....
  • NordUral
    NordUral April 13 2020 15: 00 New
    -1
    They will just stir up, as usual.
  • Altona
    Altona April 13 2020 09: 04 New
    +3
    Quote: seti
    In general, all oligarchs and transnational corporations are in the black. Only ordinary consumers are in the red

    ----------------------
    Now the cost of gasoline in the USA and in Russia is the same. With completely different incomes.
    https://ru.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/
    1. Freeman
      Freeman April 13 2020 13: 19 New
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      Quote: seti
      In general, all oligarchs and transnational corporations are in the black. Only ordinary consumers are in the red

      ----------------------
      Now the cost of gasoline in the USA and in Russia is the same. With completely different incomes.
      https://ru.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/


      Here's more real-world data on gas station prices, rather than the "average hospital temperature", where prices per gallon range from $ 3.99 in California to $ 1.26 in Utah (for example).
      Compare the area of ​​the United States, painted in dark colors (cheaper) with lighter (more expensive).
      By increasing the map, you can see the prices at gas stations.

      https://www.gasbuddy.com/GasPriceMap?lat=39.84039254899492&lng=-102.30611186569878&z=4
      1. Altona
        Altona April 13 2020 15: 14 New
        +3
        Quote: Freeman
        Here's more real-world data on gas station prices, rather than the "average hospital temperature", where prices per gallon range from $ 3.99 in California to $ 1.26 in Utah (for example).

        -------------------------
        And when you consider. that a gallon is 3,8 liters, the price of gasoline is very low. 100 rubles for 3,8 liters (at the lowest bar you have indicated) figuratively, and there are even cheaper (I even found 0,89), that is, 23-27 rubles per liter.
    2. NordUral
      NordUral April 13 2020 15: 01 New
      -1
      "Our" authorities have failed to work, but it should be higher.
  • Sergey39
    Sergey39 April 13 2020 11: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: seti
    In general, all oligarchs and transnational corporations are in the black. Only ordinary consumers are in the red

    Just the opposite. Most of the oligarchs and multinationals are in deep red. Financial markets have collapsed, which could only play into the hands of a few who cranked up the "coronavirus" scam.
  • NordUral
    NordUral April 13 2020 14: 59 New
    +1
    And they are always in the black, as we are always in the black. And then it will be.
  • Fff
    Fff April 13 2020 15: 11 New
    +3
    Why are consumers in the red? In the US, gasoline fell from 45 rubles to 25 rubles per liter
  • aybolyt678
    aybolyt678 April 14 2020 09: 59 New
    0
    Annoying when enemies praise you sad
  • smart ass
    smart ass April 14 2020 20: 29 New
    0
    I think everyone is happy for Putin that he is so well done ?!
  • den3080
    den3080 April 13 2020 08: 01 New
    11
    Woke up in the morning from a strange shine outside the window. I looked out ... and for sure: the OPEC deal ++++ on the horizon sparkles, shines so that it is impossible to look at it without smoked glass.
    laughing
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather April 13 2020 08: 05 New
      -2
      "peremoga" .. I am happy ... yes
    2. NordUral
      NordUral April 13 2020 15: 02 New
      -1
      Did you arrange it so as not to go blind?
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. mikh-korsakov
      mikh-korsakov April 13 2020 08: 24 New
      13
      Schukin! I agree. Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. The general trick of journalists. Someone farted - they will write all of Poland.
  • Mordvin 3
    Mordvin 3 April 13 2020 08: 10 New
    15
    And one of the commentators called the deal “Putin’s brilliant operation,” adding:

    Trump is in his pocket. Two more months, and there will be no sanctions, you will see.

    Why write comment idiot?
  • viktor_ui
    viktor_ui April 13 2020 08: 14 New
    +2
    And why are the numbers not announced, which of the participants on the list are polled, the production will be reduced daily and by how much: how much Russia and how much the USA are for objectivity and clarity ... why was aftur shy ??? Come on modest baits.
    1. Redfox11
      Redfox11 April 13 2020 08: 31 New
      10
      Russia produced 10.4 million barrels without gas condensate in April, the reduction will be 1.9 million, the Saudi in April produced 12.3 million barrels, the reduction will be 3.8 million barrels, the Americans have lost more than 2 oil rigs to 100 in the last 508 weeks, the reduction by the end of the year will be 3 million barrels.
      1. viktor_ui
        viktor_ui April 13 2020 08: 56 New
        -2
        Your answer is not at my request ... how much each participant in this transaction has a reduction limit in numbers. The data is already there and it is very interesting. So I tell you about Thomas, and you write about Yeryomu to me, a respected defendant wassat
      2. Avior
        Avior April 13 2020 09: 06 New
        -2
        I read you and remember the old joke about who took the honorable second place and who came next to last.
        It is nothing that in March they mined 11,3, and in April already 10,4? And now 8,5 will be needed.
        1. Redfox11
          Redfox11 April 13 2020 09: 12 New
          +5
          11.3 this is with gas condensate (condensate 8%), the actual oil production in March was 10.4.
          1. Avior
            Avior April 13 2020 09: 19 New
            -3
            in March, just the oil price war began.
            March - it's so different ...
            1. Redfox11
              Redfox11 April 13 2020 09: 27 New
              +5
              The statistics you write for March is gas condensate, which is 8% of 11.3, and in March and February, oil production was 10.4 million barrels.
    2. NordUral
      NordUral April 13 2020 15: 03 New
      -1
      If he writes, then the fee from the winner will not receive.
  • Peter is not the first
    Peter is not the first April 13 2020 08: 20 New
    +2
    Well, at least in the eyes of the Poles, we won. Peremoga and zrada, always confused.
  • mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov April 13 2020 08: 22 New
    +1
    In Poland, discussing the oil deal! Does it concern them? The first time I hear that in Poland they extracted a lot of oil. As for gas prices - at what price will they sell oil for that and buy it. Is that dad from anger is approaching.
    1. Malyuta
      Malyuta April 13 2020 10: 16 New
      +5
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      The first time I hear that in Poland they extracted a lot of oil

      In Poland, apples are harvested and you, a colleague, are ashamed to not know about it.
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      As for gas prices - at what price will they sell oil for that and buy it. Is that dad from anger is approaching.

      It simply amazes your ignorance. According to our agents, Petrov and Vasechkin’s fitness trainers, the oil price crisis provoked not Sechin, but the Old Man-Lukashenko to bargain 10 cents discounts from the Russian Federation, since it’s beneficial for him to buy oil from Russian entrepreneurs (we don’t have oligarchs, banned in the Russian Federation) at a price of $ 99,90 for a 200-liter barrel.
  • Vitaly Tsymbal
    Vitaly Tsymbal April 13 2020 08: 25 New
    +8
    Dear editors of the MILITARY REVIEW, can you stop filling the "pages" with opuses about anything ??? What is this article for, what is it about and what does Poland have to do with LIKES and DISLAYS (Poles always LAYUT to Russia), if the same thing is written in more detail and is interesting in other foreign media? Sorry for being straightforward, but this material is a shame for a publication that claims to be analytical !!!
    1. Motorist
      Motorist April 13 2020 14: 03 New
      +3
      Poles always "LAYUT" to Russia

      The Poles (whom I know) are mostly adequate people, especially those who are older. It’s not worth it, Vitaliy, all with one arshin ... hi
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Sardanapalus
      Sardanapalus April 13 2020 13: 10 New
      -2
      Putin is categorically against the monuments in his honor. For he’s smart (in all seriousness) .. and knows what awaits his monuments. As soon as he leaves or he leaves .. they’ll expose him. How is clever from wise different? The smart one will get out of any situation, but the wise one will not get into this situation. And he got. As well as most of us. All smart.)
      1. antique
        antique April 13 2020 14: 28 New
        +1
        Quote: Sardanapalus
        Putin is categorically against the monuments in his honor. For smart (in all seriousness) .. and knows what awaits his monuments.

        I think he is more timid than smart. One of the last decrees, which allowed the FSO to use army military equipment, was especially touched. This is strong. Seen sausage is not childish, scary.
        1. your1970
          your1970 April 13 2020 15: 44 New
          -2
          The armored personnel carriers of the USSR did not bother you, didn’t they see the oligarchs too, were they afraid of the people? Or the presence of the Taman division in Moscow, again under the USSR?
          Or Dzerzhinsky’s divisions, in the same place in Moscow under the USSR? Scary .... [/ quote = antique] It’s obvious that it’s sausage not childish, scary. [/ Quote] The CPSU Central Committee was so scared - that they kept 2 divisions to protect their loved ones?
          1. antique
            antique April 13 2020 16: 36 New
            +2
            Why juggle? The protection of senior officials during the Union was carried out by the KGB. If I remember 9 control correctly.
            Neither the Ministry of Internal Affairs nor the army had anything to do with this. Armed with the KGB, the Beshniks were small arms.
            And army divisions always stood and were stationed either in the cities of regional subordination, or next to them. In addition to those who were in the "field".
            Therefore, the arming of the FSO with army equipment looks strange.
            1. antique
              antique April 13 2020 16: 39 New
              0
              And the FSO is the former 9th KGB department. Which Korzhakov, by decree of Yeltsin, withdrew from the KGB.
          2. Igor Aviator
            Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 00 New
            0
            [quote = sv1970] The armored personnel carriers of the USSR didn’t embarrass you, weren’t they afraid of seeing the oligarchs of the people too? or the presence of the Taman division in Moscow, again under the USSR?
            Or Dzerzhinsky’s divisions, in the same place in the USSR during the USSR? Scary .... [/ quote = antique] It’s obvious that it’s sausage not childish, scary. [/ Quote] The CPSU Central Committee was so scared - that they kept 2 divisions to protect their loved ones? [ / quote]
            Do not, do not bother! With that number of "like people" (I often see similar ones - Gozman, Navalny, Khodorkovsky, Kasparov, Amnuel, Nikulin, Sytin ... - they are innumerable! I'm afraid the hand will get tired of chopping (c) angry ), such as that of strangers is not necessary! So, I think, divisions on a million-plus city should be MORE! nothing if necessary, and I will join the ranks of the warriors whom you are so afraid of, even if in reserve!
      2. NordUral
        NordUral April 13 2020 15: 05 New
        +1
        Exactly, we were all very smart in the 80-90s.
  • Avior
    Avior April 13 2020 08: 29 New
    +5
    usually invites readers to mark “likes” and “dislikes” this or that news on the site

    clicked on the link, and got back to VO.

    Previously, randomly selected comments from unknown users were given in articles, and now "likes" are also used as an argument in the article.
    It is sad.
  • Chingachguk
    Chingachguk April 13 2020 08: 51 New
    -13
    GDP quietly tilted Saudis and Donald ..... Shale mining is not profitable for the United States at such prices, which means that the United States recognized the fact that shale gas from the United States will never be cheaper than Russian, and if someone from the producing countries starts to burozit like the Saudis, gas supplies from America may stop altogether! So let Merkel start thinking how to finish laying the pipeline! Putin now may not even bother about this, just quietly and calmly take a place in the front row. For the GDP, many world players today have become puppets, and judging by how Trump has been bustling over the past few days, Putin also found a bolt with a strong thread on the lower back of America.
    1. Altona
      Altona April 13 2020 09: 07 New
      +4
      Quote: Chingachguk
      GDP quietly tilted the Saudis and Donald ...

      ------------------------------
      Is it like that? Having dropped the price of its oil to a negative value with delivery? Let Donald say thanks that helped him save his face, rugged by plastic surgery. There is still some kind of GDP in the astral plane; it seems to be already emperor of the solar system.
      1. Chingachguk
        Chingachguk April 13 2020 09: 40 New
        -3
        Well, they all directly invested in their message and plastic surgery and the ambitions of the emperor ... What is the cost of a barrel of shale oil for the United States? What did the US oil shale mining companies howl? What did Trump bite Putin on the last day? So who should say thank you to whom?
        1. Altona
          Altona April 13 2020 11: 37 New
          0
          Quote: Chingachguk
          What did the US oil shale mining companies howl? What did Trump bite Putin on the last day?

          ----------------------
          Trump pranked Putin? Did the TV tell you this? And about the oil shale miners? Well, you must. They apparently have nothing to do and the US budget consists of 50 percent of petrodollars like ours. If the emperor does not pull the strap, then everyone will remember him. This is an axiom. If earlier some tactfulness was observed, then according to the principle of reciprocity, they will bite him just like he does us. So this is still a soft "combing".
          PS Trump doesn't need Putin. And even more so, "trick" him over the phone. The impeachment and investigation of "interference in the elections" has not yet been canceled. Truth you at least a bit of comfort, ours is still "the emperor of the world." laughing
          1. Malyuta
            Malyuta April 13 2020 11: 58 New
            +8
            Quote: Altona
            Truth to you at least a bit of comfort, ours is still "the emperor of the world."

            This citizen did not have exactly one month before the emperor, so that in the eyes of Putin, he will forever remain a candidate for emperor, because very soon their zombie scrapes will swing and shake with reality.
          2. Chingachguk
            Chingachguk April 13 2020 16: 15 New
            -5
            Who bites you? What place? Do you want to make plastic yourself but no money? I can’t understand why you are so frightened by that? Are you Trump's right hand? Or is everyone here simply obligated to believe the word, not the Putin administration? You are funny ..... wink
      2. Redfox11
        Redfox11 April 13 2020 09: 42 New
        -8
        The coronavirus was dropped, not Putin, and everyone had a negative price, especially the shale. Trump called Putin and not vice versa, the Sauds convened a meeting and invited Russia after the arrival of US senators. Putin is the last in the top three. Your hidden child insult about a rugged face is funny, a lift is a standard procedure for those who have money and who appear on TV.
        1. antique
          antique April 13 2020 10: 24 New
          -2
          Quote: RedFox11
          .Your hidden child insult about a rugged face is funny, a lift is a standard procedure, for those who have money and who appear on TV.

          And did Trump operate? Does Trump have a manicure? But Putin has one. Boris Johnson has a very rumpled appearance, and seems to be not going to do anything with himself.
          Find at least one major politician with plastic surgery on his face.
          1. Chingachguk
            Chingachguk April 13 2020 16: 24 New
            -4
            But what, well-groomed hands and a tightened face cause irritation in you? Do politicians of non-traditional orientation inspire respect from you? Especially untidy looking and dirt under the nails ......
        2. Chingachguk
          Chingachguk April 13 2020 16: 16 New
          -5
          "Friends" of Russia will minus to death ....... wassat
  • Zaurbek
    Zaurbek April 13 2020 09: 00 New
    -3
    What will Fedun say? Some win, others fail! PR rule everything.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 April 13 2020 11: 06 New
      0
      Quote: Zaurbek
      what will Fedun say?

      Fedun Nehai is engaged in his pig farm. The Czech Republic will sooner or later resume, and they are within reach. yes
  • Fitter65
    Fitter65 April 13 2020 09: 04 New
    -3
    Putin’s “brilliant operation” oil deal called in comments in the press of Poland
    Well, there is no need to be a cool analyst. or have seven spans in the forehead, if the Poles say that the operation is brilliant, then Russia is in flight. good
    1. Chingachguk
      Chingachguk April 13 2020 16: 27 New
      -3
      An interesting observation and conclusion ..... sad
  • jekasimf
    jekasimf April 13 2020 09: 12 New
    0
    Forgive me, but what is "wrong" in this deal for Russia. Earlier, the entire volume by which Russia reduced production was immediately occupied by the USA. And it didn’t care for her. But now the USA was forced to cut 2 million barrels. And at the same time, the predicted oil price is 45 bucks, which means that it is still NOT profitable for shale producers! Russia got what it wanted, with a decrease in the amount of exported oil, it will receive more money, while the US shale producers will continue to go bankrupt.
    1. unaha
      unaha April 13 2020 10: 59 New
      -1
      The "not so" at least is that it is enough for shale producers not to drill new wells to reduce production. We will have to preserve the existing ones and it is not a fact that they will not be lost at all. Of course they will try to get out somehow, but will it work? Large TNCs may succeed, but what should small companies that have several wells and do not have protection ... And they are often very significant taxpayers to local budgets.
    2. Fitter65
      Fitter65 April 13 2020 11: 10 New
      -3
      Quote: jekasimf
      Excuse me, but what is "wrong" in this deal for Russia.

      Well, as an example of an article on the same topic, but only a few days earlier it was written.,OPEC cuts production, Texas considers profit, The United States will reduce oil production by 250 thousand barrels, and Russia - by 2,5 million. Deal with OPEC + called humiliating for Russia There is a desire to look through, look ...
    3. Chingachguk
      Chingachguk April 13 2020 16: 38 New
      -2
      And a friend needs to get a stake on his head, he will still be blowing his own !!!! You louder louder, higher salary !!!! laughing
      Totally agree with you. Putin beat everyone and showed that mattresses do not pull the price competition. But if it were to stretch the GDP this thing until the fall, when the shale would have run out of insurance, then it would have been great ...... and sooooo interesting .....
    4. Willywonka
      Willywonka April 14 2020 09: 16 New
      0
      Once again, who and where made the US reduce production? They are not in the contract. US forces to cut neither OPEC nor Putin nor paid trolls. There is only one factor - the market.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 April 13 2020 09: 19 New
    +1
    "big uncles" agree when they cannot win in one, especially when losses are inevitable for everyone and for each of them!
    This is normal, the art of compromise was not born today! and even the elephant is forced to make concessions when something begins to bake him, too!
    Something in the very, most, win ??? this is not a question now, and the assessments are very different from all sides pouring in.
    Let's see, in short.
  • dgonni
    dgonni April 13 2020 09: 22 New
    +2
    And where did the author find the presence of the USA and Canada in the deal? Here is a plate with quotas for reduction! It’s not clear where the states with Canada are. (https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/el_murid/16552936/1603267/1603267_original.jpg)
    Well, thanks to the trump of GDP for the fact that he became in the right position and did not resist? Not even funny!
    1. Lister
      Lister April 13 2020 18: 41 New
      14
      Quote: dgonni
      And where did the author find the presence of the USA and Canada in the deal?

      They are not there! yes
      They do not sign such papers yes
  • Keeping
    Keeping April 13 2020 09: 40 New
    +2
    March 5 - Russia rejects the proposal to reduce production by 0,3 million barrels per day and ruins the OPEC deal

    April 8 - Russia is ready to reduce production by 1,6 million barrels per day.

    April 9 - Russia is ready to reduce production by 2 million barrels per day.

    Following the meeting of OPEC, Russia will reduce production by 2,5 million barrels.

    BRILLIANT OPERATION !!!
    1. 30143
      30143 April 13 2020 09: 48 New
      -2
      Definitely, Putin lost this round. Aging, it is felt that the scent has become dull and the grip is not the same.
      1. Lister
        Lister April 13 2020 18: 40 New
        12
        Why did you lose? Due to lower production? Or won that a new production option has been drawn up?
        1. Willywonka
          Willywonka April 14 2020 09: 19 New
          +1
          Saudis will throw us from the European market. They are vengeful guys ..... in this and lost. It was not necessary to enter this phase of the relationship.
    2. Redfox11
      Redfox11 April 13 2020 10: 01 New
      -3
      You have a lot of mistakes, at the beginning of March OPEC wanted to reduce 1.5 million barrels (Russia 500 sauds 000), these 200 million in a situation where extra 000 million barrels do not affect anything. Now Russia will reduce 1.5 and not 20, because the OPEC deal excluding gas condensate, production 1.9 will be 2.5. The total reduction of 10.4 million (OPEC + and USA Canada Norway) barrels now, against 8.5 million barrels in early March.
    3. GRIGORIY76
      GRIGORIY76 April 13 2020 10: 34 New
      -1
      This is called "many point moves"
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx April 13 2020 09: 47 New
    +1
    Experts agree that today's low oil prices may be beneficial ...

    ... only to buyers of oil or to those who sell stolen raw materials, because in the world everyone appreciates his work.
    Labor money
    Adyghe parable

    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek April 13 2020 11: 24 New
      +1
      It used to be a custom to give my son to someone else's family, to learn the craft and to be brought up in strictness .....
  • 501Legion
    501Legion April 13 2020 09: 59 New
    +4
    still would like to pay attention to likes and dislikes of some newspaper, and even more so to the stench from the Poles.
  • Igor Pa
    Igor Pa April 13 2020 10: 01 New
    0

    Experts agree that today's low oil prices can be beneficial, for example, to India and China.
    iksperdy do not even suggest that it is much more profitable for me than India and China. am
  • lot
    lot April 13 2020 10: 06 New
    +2
    Another brilliant analytics gossip on the site.
    Already such garbage to publish ...
  • regdan
    regdan April 13 2020 10: 08 New
    +2
    At first they said shale oil kirdyk. Now it turns out not kirdyk ... where zrada where there is no need to search for a break. Speak as is Russia crap ... as I vanged ...
  • Maks1995
    Maks1995 April 13 2020 10: 08 New
    +1
    "(currently 118 versus 17)." - 135 people is this the press?
    IMHO, it was still not enough to start referring to Polish homeless people ...

    It would be better if a writer, football player or rapper was asked. On the Star - rappers a separate type of troops)))). Secret of course.)))
  • Doccor18
    Doccor18 April 13 2020 10: 59 New
    0
    First, we dropped the ruble, raised prices for everything. Then they thought and decided to reduce production. Immediately obvious, Wise rulers.
  • voyaka uh
    voyaka uh April 13 2020 11: 07 New
    +3
    The deal will work or not, it will be visible at the end of May.
    Now oil, which is sold at a low price, is poured into storage and in
    super tankers in stock.
    If demand jumps at the end of May, a reduction in production saved prices, if
    no, the oil market will remain at zero.
    1. Liam
      Liam April 13 2020 11: 15 New
      -2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If demand jumps at the end of May, a reduction in production saved prices

      True, if prices are skipped, the shales of Canada, the United States, Brazil and other neopec increase production again. But there is no OPEC +, for the collapse will happen. A double-edged cartel
      1. Altona
        Altona April 13 2020 11: 49 New
        -2
        Quote: Liam
        True, if prices are skipped-shale Canada, USA, Brazil and other neopec

        -------------------------
        The Russian Federation will not be able to increase production immediately. Now many wells will have to be simply shut and forgotten.
        1. Liam
          Liam April 13 2020 11: 53 New
          -3
          Russia is a member of the OPEC + cartel and will not be able to increase even if it is technically possible.
    2. Altona
      Altona April 13 2020 11: 44 New
      -1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The deal will work or not, it will be visible at the end of May.
      Now oil, which is sold at a low price, is poured into storage and in
      super tankers in stock.

      ----------------------
      Winter is over, half of the transport is stopped — airplanes and ships with trains. So it is unlikely that there will go much increase in consumption, Lesch. As for our oil, they could give farmers free diesel fuel and fuel for sowing, but they won’t, the toad will strangle.
  • Avior
    Avior April 13 2020 11: 25 New
    +2

    for illustration, who mined how much and how much will be under the new agreement.
    1. Altona
      Altona April 13 2020 11: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Avior
      for illustration, who mined how much and how much will be under the new agreement.

      ---------------------
      I wrote about this last week in order to plunge some here into a new reality, otherwise many also live on Mars.
      1. Avior
        Avior April 13 2020 12: 12 New
        -2
        at the top of each thread on this topic it makes sense to post so that there are no unnecessary questions
    2. Freeman
      Freeman April 13 2020 13: 45 New
      +2
      Avior (Sergey) Today, 11: 25
      for illustration, who mined how much and how much will be under the new agreement.

      Excuse me, where is USA in this table? Or will they only reduce production by 100 thousand barrels instead of Mexico?
      1. Willywonka
        Willywonka April 14 2020 09: 24 New
        +1
        Well, probably the United States is not in OPEC +. The only factor that forces the US to lower the price is the market.
  • Zabvo
    Zabvo April 13 2020 11: 36 New
    +3
    Meanwhile, the import of cheap gas from abroad was banned in the Russian Federation, sir ... what
    1. Catholic
      Catholic April 13 2020 14: 59 New
      +6
      Why do we need imported gasoline? Maybe it's better to lower the price of your gasoline?
      1. Zabvo
        Zabvo April 19 2020 22: 23 New
        0
        Well, how would it be logical for you, for me, for any sane person in our country, but for those who pump oil, it’s not logical. Cheap gasoline in Russia is fantastic.
  • 123456789
    123456789 April 13 2020 11: 39 New
    +1
    Quote: 501Legion
    still would like to pay attention to likes and dislikes of some newspaper, and even more so to the stench from the Poles.

    Even Poland has not disappeared, but has already given a darling laughing
    1. Catholic
      Catholic April 13 2020 14: 58 New
      +8
      She has long been a sweetheart laughing
  • forty-eighth
    forty-eighth April 13 2020 11: 53 New
    +2
    This is just great news. Some God-forgotten Polish news portal wrote about the OPEC deal. This article has collected as many as 113 (!) Dislikes, and in the comments some Pole praised Putin. And the leading Russian media immediately wrote about this. Level! Not this way. LEVEL!

    PS I’m waiting for the guys from NYT or WP to begin to refer to this comment. I want to snatch my ray of glory.
  • sanik2020
    sanik2020 April 13 2020 11: 59 New
    0
    Experts agree that today's low oil prices may be beneficial, for example, to India and China

    What about other buyers that low prices are disadvantageous? In experts, in genius.
    1. Graduate student
      Graduate student April 13 2020 15: 51 New
      +6
      Low prices are beneficial to everyone who buys oil. But oil suppliers, cheap oil, are very unprofitable.
  • Laksamana besar
    Laksamana besar April 13 2020 12: 03 New
    +1
    Trump said in the news that he did a favor to Mexico for 100 thousand barrels and then she will pay for everything. Pure business.
  • ender
    ender April 13 2020 12: 04 New
    -5
    Russian reaction to Polish comments: -

    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Polish experts called it Putin’s brilliant operation !!!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    Russophobes !!
    .
    .
    .
    1. Catholic
      Catholic April 13 2020 14: 55 New
      +6
      They are Russophobia.yes
      You do not agree?
  • Pavel T
    Pavel T April 13 2020 12: 26 New
    +2
    In already completely dropped, the opinion of one Pole is considered a victory, many forum users are the same. That is, the opinion of at least one Pole is not indifferent to you? And before, especially on the forum: what and who is this Poland, we will crush her naked booty if necessary, but generally do not care about her. It’s all from the area: I have been chasing you for so long to say how indifferent you are to me))) ugh
  • Alexy
    Alexy April 13 2020 13: 43 New
    +3
    Stop calling this shame a brilliant operation !!!
    1. Graduate student
      Graduate student April 13 2020 15: 50 New
      +3
      This is a common oil production agreement.
  • iouris
    iouris April 13 2020 15: 21 New
    0
    The fact that a systemic crisis of a world order will lead to an energy crisis is like two and two. Not to see a crisis of world order, limited only by oil prices, is the result of a specific upbringing.
    1. Graduate student
      Graduate student April 13 2020 15: 49 New
      +6
      There is not so much a crisis of world order as a crisis of capitalism.
      1. iouris
        iouris April 13 2020 16: 14 New
        -1
        And besides capitalism, is there anything else ?!
  • lis-ik
    lis-ik April 13 2020 16: 31 New
    +6
    All the operations there are "brilliant", especially the "South" and "North" flows were successful, and a rollback in production by 2003 is generally a check and checkmate against the slates of the foe. It is not for nothing that they say "a miser pays twice."
    1. Fan-fan
      Fan-fan April 13 2020 17: 36 New
      +4
      For 20 years, the authorities have become proficient in how to pass a failure as a victory and persistently tryndet about victory. But one should not expect another from them, did anyone hear that Putin at least once admitted his mistake or the mistake of his closest friends? At least someone has been punished, for example, for a fine to Gazprom of 3 lard greens or for continuing to remove us from the Olympics? SP2 kirdyk, with the South Stream problems, gas through Ukraine Putin was forced to pump, and even at their price, is that a victory?
      1. Igor Aviator
        Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 13 New
        -5
        And you are NOT ALLOWED, do your job well! Who are you. to demand a report? Gozman's henchman. or Sytin, or what? It is THEY who are all howling - "Russia is gone ..."
    2. Igor Aviator
      Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 16 New
      -4
      Well, if people like you started to howl, then really everything is getting better! good
    3. iouris
      iouris April 14 2020 17: 39 New
      0
      Quote: lis-ik
      especially successful streams "South" and "North"

      Not the fact that they will not be unprofitable or, in general, will not be blocked. In addition, Trump can simply make him pay (about 51% of the percent), he does it famously. Unless the States will abandon Europe and go on a defensive defense according to the Monroe Doctrine, but this is not yet believed. Most likely, these flows will work only after the war (it does not seem, however, that this option should be considered).
  • boss
    boss April 13 2020 17: 01 New
    +1
    Again conspiracies, nostradamuses and reptolids fly to nibira
    1. Lister
      Lister April 13 2020 18: 33 New
      15
      Humanity cannot seem to do without all this ... At all times, people believed in all possible conspiracies, oracles, and so on ...
  • Igor Aviator
    Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 09 New
    -3
    Quote: Chingachguk
    Well, they all directly invested in their message and plastic surgery and the ambitions of the emperor ...

    Apparently, he has nothing to say - there are not enough arguments ... Khutspa - she is like that, when she has nothing to say - they switch to appearance and so on .. Here I have a direct argument - I VERY WELL remember WHAT Russia was BEFORE the GDP came to power, and WHAT she is in the world NOW! How I survived with my family Before the Supreme came to power, and HOW I live now. So, do not work, gentlemen, henchmen - liberoids, to blame Putin - if necessary, I’ll cover his back!
  • Igor Aviator
    Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 25 New
    -3
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The deal will work or not, it will be visible at the end of May.

    Hello! I don’t think so soon! Processes affecting large masses of people are quite inertial, and given that to raise prices, in addition, huge surpluses of oil in reserves should be consumed, at least in part, then the dates before autumn - winter 20g should not be considered. IMHO hi
  • Igor Aviator
    Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 31 New
    -4
    Quote: 30143
    Putin lost this round. Aging, it is felt that the scent has become dull and the grip is not the same.

    Not for you to judge!
  • Igor Aviator
    Igor Aviator April 13 2020 22: 40 New
    -2
    Quote: Chingachguk
    But what, well-groomed hands and a tightened face cause irritation in you? Do politicians of non-traditional orientation inspire respect from you? Especially untidy looking and dirt under the nails ......

    And they really like the honesty and patriotism of Navalny and Khodorkovsky, the "Eagle Eye" of Sytin and Gozman! wassat
  • Maxwrx
    Maxwrx April 13 2020 23: 57 New
    +2
    Yeah, brilliantly fucked up Putin! Saudi Arabia increased production by 2,5 million / ton, we did not increase. And from the new figure we are reducing by 2 million, and the Saudis by 1,5. Those. we really reduce by 20%, and they increased by 5%. Moreover, the cost of urals fell more than Arab oil. In general, the losses are awful, and most importantly, we recorded a level with them, now all subsequent transactions will be from their high base and our low base.
  • Febi
    Febi April 14 2020 08: 53 New
    +2
    Yes))) It is unlikely that anyone could crap steeper)))) Only our "genius" "
  • Jarserge
    Jarserge April 14 2020 10: 15 New
    0
    If the Poles praise Russia, it is at least suspicious.
    1. Freeman
      Freeman April 14 2020 11: 30 New
      +2
      Quote: Jarserge
      If the Poles praise Russia, it is at least suspicious.


      They do not praise, but troll. Only our pro-government propagandists, if the appropriate "smiley" is not set, understand everything literally.
      This is because their "brain" is in the language.
      And there, there is only one gyrus - and that one is direct, though flexible.
      / sarcasm /
      typical portrait of propagandist
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Dmitry V.
    Dmitry V. April 14 2020 11: 22 New
    +1
    On March 6, Russia was supposed to be reduced by 0.5 mln barrels per day, on April 10 it was necessary to agree to 2,5 million barrels, the price of brent until March 6 was about 46-47 dollars, after April 10 - nothing changed 32-33 - and remains in same range.
    The USA did not undertake any obligations, the Saudis increased production and decreased from the increased volume, the Russian Federation decreased from previous volumes ...
    And where is Putin’s gain?
    The fiasco of March 6 with additional commitments to reduce - it is hoped that the price of oil will win back for 3-4 months.

    It is difficult to recall a more incompetent economic transaction - even the purchase of Lehman Brothers shares in 2008 after meeting with President Bush and their complete depreciation seems a small mistake ...
  • Maks winter
    Maks winter April 14 2020 14: 14 New
    0
    "OPEC - the largest mafia in the world".

    wassat
  • Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 April 14 2020 21: 47 New
    +6
    I am impressed .. how Zatulin expresses his thoughts, as a political scientist. delicate, smart, and not annoying. Now it’s a rarity.