Clash on nuclear frontier: India strikes with 155mm howitzer FH77 Bofors

99

From India, there are reports of a new clash on the Indo-Pakistani border in Jammu and Kashmir. Indian media report that the Pakistani army opened fire on Indian territory using artillery and small arms weapon.

As stated in the Ministry of Defense of India, the Indian security forces "were forced to engage in a shootout."



From materials in the Indian media:

The Indian army used artillery to defeat enemy firing points. Ammunition depots were also chosen as targets. The operation was carried out in the sector of Keran in Kupwar (Jammu and Kashmir). Earlier there, terrorists tried to break through the border.

Recall that during the breakthrough attempt made by the militants, 5 Indian soldiers were killed, including paratroopers from the Para-SF detachment, who were ambushed. They were landed in the area of ​​combat clashes from the air (from the helicopter). According to some reports, the reason for the decrease in the combat effectiveness of this detachment was that the Indian paratroopers were landed in deep snow.

It is reported that during the Friday shootout, Indian troops used 105 and 155 mm caliber artillery. In particular, we are talking about the 155-mm howitzer FH77 Bofors.

Press officer of the Indian Ministry of Defense:

Our troops responded effectively and decisively. There are reports of heavy damage on the Pakistani side. There are no victims on our part. In connection with the melting of snow on the passes, the number of provocations and attempts to break through the border increased. But we are ready to stop them.


Presented video with footage taken from drone. The footage shows a shell hitting an ammunition depot, where the detonation of the contents began:



It is worth recalling that India and Pakistan are nuclear powers adjacent to each other.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    99 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -3
      April 11 2020 07: 16
      I look at the photo and the "parquet jeep" comes to mind, how it is in the mud with these wheels ...
      1. -4
        April 11 2020 07: 37
        Quote: unhappy
        I look at the photo and the "parquet jeep" comes to mind, how it is in the mud with these wheels ...

        Swedes did.
        There they have asphalt everywhere.
        The Indians need to buy our "Malki". And on caterpillars and if it shakes - so it shakes! laughing
        1. +3
          April 11 2020 09: 27
          Quote: Paul Siebert
          Swedes did. There they have asphalt everywhere.

          =======
          Excuse me, but in the photo below - ALSO Sweden?

          fool
          1. -3
            April 11 2020 12: 07
            Keep your fists for the Indians
        2. 0
          April 11 2020 10: 53
          Swedes did.
          There they have asphalt everywhere.

          Is that the Swedes? Can you imagine where this Sweden is located?
          1. -1
            April 11 2020 12: 32
            Quote: alexmach
            Is that the Swedes? Can you imagine where this Sweden is located?

            Tell the ignoramus.
            Somewhere near Poltava?
            1. 0
              April 11 2020 13: 58
              Soviet textbook on geography for the sixth grade to help you.
              1. -1
                April 11 2020 14: 06
                That is, do not you remember?
              2. +1
                April 11 2020 14: 11
                Quote: alexmach
                Soviet textbook on geography for the sixth grade to help you.

                Judging by the word "walk", you learned Russian from this textbook ...
                1. -2
                  April 11 2020 14: 59
                  Well, at least something has been given to you in this life. Although you can talk about the rules of spelling. Only the forum did you happen to be mistaken?
                  1. +1
                    April 11 2020 15: 14
                    Do you want to teach me life, dear?
                    According to sixth grade textbooks?
                    Wow - I choose the forums ...
                    To get started, go to Sweden.
                    By the way, I've been there four times ...
                    1. -2
                      April 11 2020 15: 23
                      Do you want to teach me life, dear?

                      I don’t have the slightest desire at all, I just point out to you the fallacy of your argument.
                      By the way, I've been there four times ...

                      This is of course an achievement, it is difficult to challenge.
                      Wow - I choose the forums ...

                      Your rude behavior generally does not leave any desire to communicate with you.
        3. 0
          April 11 2020 11: 01
          Quote: Paul Siebert
          There they have asphalt everywhere.

          yeah, solid asphalt))



          In Sweden, the conditions are roughly the same. like in our middle lane
      2. +10
        April 11 2020 07: 43
        The Indo-Pakistani conflict has been going on since 1947 .... and, I think, it will last the same three more times! Mahatma Gandhi was trying to reach out to both Hindus and Muslims that you can live in peace, but the Muslims did not like to obey the Indians, and the Indians were not going to (and are not going to) give Kashmir, which is populated mainly by Muslims, to Pakistan and everything was wrapped up ... Kashmir is almost all over the square like Belarus - I write here, Belarus should join Russia, so the Belarusians write letters to me calling me an occupant and accusing me of frenzied militant chauvinism - and we are one people, of the same faith ... laughing And here is the exact opposite - this fuss will not end, and the presence of nuclear weapons India and Pakistan more or less restrains from a big mess! But if Belarus and Russia reunite sooner or later, because this is a historical fact, and separation is artificially created historical stupidity, then the Indo-Pakistan conflict is unresolvable!
        1. +1
          April 11 2020 08: 48
          Quote: Finches
          .and, I think, three more times will last the same!

          I agree .. It’s with them, like guard dances on the border ..))))
        2. Dog
          0
          April 12 2020 23: 28
          Quote: Finches
          Gandhi kept trying to reach out to both Hindus and Muslims, that you can live in peace, but Muslims did not like to obey the Indians

          Why would you? The Indians have continuous jolly - there, for example, in the 70s the program of mass sterilization of the population was implemented. Not life - but a fairy tale.
      3. +5
        April 11 2020 07: 54
        Quote: unhappy
        I look at the photo and the "parquet jeep" comes to mind, how it is in the mud with these wheels ...

        Great, she's in the mud. It can even help a towing vehicle if stuck
        1. +2
          April 11 2020 08: 03
          Do not confuse people. This car should still carry a howitzer in the war zone, it will ride on asphalt in a parade. Wheels on remote brackets, as in children's drawings.
          1. +1
            April 11 2020 08: 17
            Quote: unhappy
            Do not confuse people. This car should still carry a howitzer in a war zone,

            Конечно.
            As, for example, 2A65, which are now used in Syria.

            But at the same time, the FH77 is orders of magnitude better than the Msta-B. Just a number: thanks to the hydraulics of the Bofos, the time for transferring from marching to combat is 50 seconds, for 2A65 2 is 2.5 minutes

            Quote: unhappy
            Wheels on remote brackets, as in children's drawings.

            More of this wheel, or less?
            1. -5
              April 11 2020 08: 25
              You moved the topic to the time of the transfer to the fighting position, why? Someone mentioned about him? Can we recall the guns of the First World War?
              1. +6
                April 11 2020 09: 07
                Quote: unhappy
                You moved the topic to the time of the transfer to the fighting position, why?

                Do you think that the engine on the FH77 is designed only for movement? That would be stupid. Movement, transfer from marching to combat and back, loading, guidance and restoration of aiming are all hydraulics.

                Such a figure: a cycle from transferring from marching to combat, 8 shots, transferring from combat to marching and moving 500 meters takes no more than three minutes.
                During this time, 2A65 will only deploy in combat and begin to shoot

                Quote: unhappy
                Can we recall the guns of the First World War?

                Let me remind you that D-30, 2A65 and 2A36 are currently in service with Russian artillery, and are actively used, including in Syria
                1. -2
                  April 12 2020 06: 03
                  People on this site are well aware of this information. Did you get the plus sign? Congratulations.
                  To compare the parameters of combat vehicles created with a difference of fifty years is silly.
                  1. -2
                    April 12 2020 07: 58
                    Quote: unhappy
                    To compare the parameters of combat vehicles created with a difference of fifty years is silly.

                    ??
                    FH77 adopted by the Swedish artillery in 1978.
                    The 2A65 "Msta-S" was put into service in 1987.

                    Not fifty, but nine years.
                    1. 0
                      April 13 2020 07: 23
                      Your truth, sorry. It’s only worth recalling the difference between a Kalashnikov assault rifle and an American M-16 in Vietnam. It is also worth recalling about the shortcomings of the T-34 tank that did not prevent the effective performance of combat missions not of the tank but of the tank units.
                      The first place in the evaluation of weapons is the concept of efficiency, a set of parameters, and not some particular parameter like the presence of a hydraulic system.
                      1. 0
                        April 13 2020 08: 53
                        Quote: unhappy
                        It’s only worth recalling the difference between a Kalashnikov assault rifle and an American M-16 in Vietnam.

                        It’s not an automaton, it’s a mine. Powerful, modern, reliable ... but one-time. Because in the conditions of counter-battery it is a weapon for one fire attack.

                        FH77 has a much better chance.
                2. +2
                  April 12 2020 13: 58
                  Read sometimes what you write! Traveling in three minutes to 500 meters is a non-stop movement at a speed of 10 km / h. And also curl-turn around, 8 times aim-shoot, etc. Dreamers
                  1. -2
                    April 12 2020 16: 03
                    Let's count, all of a sudden, the truth is incorrectly written.
                    Turn into combat 50 seconds
                    Guidance - on the strength of five seconds
                    The first three shots with the restoration of the tip 13 seconds
                    The remaining five with 38 seconds recovery
                    From combat to marching 50 seconds.
                    A total of 156 seconds, 24 seconds to move. At a speed of 8 km / h it is 53 meters.
                    All right. 3 meters even extra.
                    1. Dog
                      0
                      April 12 2020 23: 57
                      Quote: Spade
                      53 meters

                      Mistaken 10 times - think!
                      1. 0
                        April 13 2020 08: 50
                        Damn, just noticed. Extra Zero

                        It justifies me that GlobalSecurity.org is a very serious site and usually does not allow such errors /
                        However, we figured out the numbers, and still the FH77 is far ahead of 2A65 in its capabilities
              2. +1
                April 11 2020 10: 24
                These wheels are just busy moving from position to position. hi
                1. 0
                  April 11 2020 11: 48
                  Including. But the main task is moving
                  1. Dog
                    +1
                    April 12 2020 23: 58
                    Quote: Spade
                    displacement

                    On the asphalt? I didn’t notice where you patched their patency.
                    1. 0
                      April 13 2020 08: 41
                      Quote: Dog⁣
                      On the asphalt? I didn’t notice where you patched their patency.

                      And I didn’t notice where you refuted it
              3. Dog
                +1
                April 13 2020 00: 17
                Quote: unhappy
                You translated the topic

                Never mind. This citizen prefers to argue with his own invented statements, attributing them to his opponent. So, you know, he’s got something from him.
                1. 0
                  April 13 2020 08: 43
                  Quote: Dog⁣
                  This citizen prefers to argue with his own invented allegations

                  And you used to lie. Like just that. Is that the only way to argue in the absence of knowledge?
            2. +2
              April 11 2020 10: 01
              Quote: Spade
              But at the same time FH77 is orders of magnitude better than "Msta-B"

              ========
              More than a controversial statement! As well as the ability to "self-propel".
              But what FH77 is - great howitzer - no doubt about that!
      4. +5
        April 11 2020 09: 25
        Quote: unhappy
        how she is in the mud with these wheels ...

        =========
        So I think, "how is it through the mud with such small wheels"?

        PS The photo shows the 152 mm howitzer Msta-B. If you mean the small removable wheels on the coulters - so they are used for easy towing!
        PPS Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak!
        1. Dog
          +1
          April 13 2020 00: 04
          Quote: venik
          If you mean the small removable wheels on the coulters - so they are used for easy towing!

          Look at least a photo / video of towing a vehicle - in the stowed position, these wheels are generally on top. What is the convenience of towing?
          And your courageous remark to you in return:
          Quote: venik
          PPS Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak!
          1. 0
            April 13 2020 09: 00
            Quote: Dog⁣
            Look at least a photo / video of towing a vehicle - in the stowed position, these wheels are generally on top. What is the convenience of towing?

            To move the howitzer to the stowed position without these podkhobotovy skating rinks is very hemorrhoid and requires more people than the calculation of howitzers
            And to tow a howitzer in a fighting position .... to put it mildly, it is inconvenient.
      5. +10
        April 11 2020 09: 41
        and these are like little children. "and I have a nail in my pocket")
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. -5
      April 11 2020 07: 17
      The virus is not enough for them. We also decided to kill each other with weapons.
      That's where the hegemon needs to use its capabilities, try them on even for a while while the virus is walking
    3. +1
      April 11 2020 07: 24
      But once it was one country, and now like Ukraine and Russia.
      1. +3
        April 11 2020 07: 33
        But once it was one country

        They were never one country. They were one English colony. They have a different language and different religion. But the Angles specifically made Jammu and Kashmir so that India and Pakistan would conflict for the rest of their lives.
        1. +4
          April 11 2020 08: 02
          Quote: Amateur
          But once it was one country

          They were never one country. They were one English colony. They have a different language and different religion. But the Angles specifically made Jammu and Kashmir so that India and Pakistan would conflict for the rest of their lives.

          Where the British visited and took control, the blood is still pouring. Burn them in hell.
          1. -2
            April 11 2020 08: 25
            Where the British visited and took control, the blood is still pouring. Burn them in hell.
            Not everywhere. hi It's awesome in the Crimea. There are wonderful weather, I dare to notice you. And so, in principle, yes. Rare fishes are rare. Yes
            1. -12
              April 11 2020 08: 45
              Quote: Observer2014
              Where the British visited and took control, the blood is still pouring. Burn them in hell.
              Not everywhere. hi It's awesome in the Crimea. There are wonderful weather, I dare to notice you. And so, in principle, yes. Rare fishes are rare. Yes

              1. In Crimea, they did not rule.
              2. Tell the pioneers about the "bloodless" "annexation" of the Crimea.

              Quote: Vasya17
              visited Australia, USA, Canada

              Australia and Canada are still under the queen, and they shed a lot of blood on the natives and Indians. With the United States also fought.
              1. +9
                April 11 2020 09: 07
                2. Tell the pioneers about the "bloodless" "annexation" of the Crimea.))))))
                --------------------------------------------------
                Tell the Boy Scouts about the "bloody resistance".
          2. 0
            April 11 2020 08: 36
            visited Australia, USA, Canada
          3. +1
            April 11 2020 11: 56
            I can not agree. The British left behind organized
            well-equipped countries with developed infrastructure, state
            institutes, police, post offices, hospitals, ports.
            Those countries that had the mind after the departure of the English colonialists
            all not to ruin and plunder, easily passed to independence.
            1. 0
              April 11 2020 14: 37
              And which for example? It’s not enough to go over to independence, you also need to preserve it in fact. And then the British left, but the interests of the corporations remained and it became much more interesting for them to work and earn profits in countries with eternal conflicts, without spending more on the maintenance of the Aboriginal police, post office, hospital, infrastructure ...
              1. 0
                April 11 2020 15: 27
                "it became much more interesting to work and make profit" ///
                ---
                Wrong.
                A lot less interesting. Because when a country gains independence,
                then it usually partially nationalizes the ownership of foreign corporations.
                In addition, they now have to pay taxes to the budget of this country.
            2. -1
              April 11 2020 15: 59
              Quote: voyaka uh
              I can not agree. The British left behind organized
              well-equipped countries with developed infrastructure, state
              institutes, police, post offices, hospitals, ports.
              Those countries that had the mind after the departure of the English colonialists
              all not to ruin and plunder, easily passed to independence.

              Oh yeah. The French simply robbed, and the British created the infrastructure to rob. However:
              India - Pakistan
              Israel-Philistines
              Israel-Jordan
              Cyprus-Turkey
              etc
              1. +1
                April 11 2020 17: 41
                In all the examples you cited
                division into states according to national or religious grounds.
                And rightly so.
                And in all the examples, this prevented the domestic massacre between
                nationalities or faiths, which is much worse than border conflicts.
                1. -2
                  April 11 2020 19: 17
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  In all the examples you cited
                  division into states according to national or religious grounds.
                  And rightly so.

                  No, not right. I won’t remember the rest of the BV countries, but Palestine was not divided correctly between Arabs and Jews, and then the Jewish part was again not correctly divided into Jewish and Arab. Yes, how to share. The partition plan died unborn.

                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  And in all the examples, this prevented the domestic massacre between
                  nationalities or faiths, which is much worse than border conflicts.

                  Yah? Which country were the Britons successfully divided and the peoples live there in peace and harmony?
              2. Dog
                0
                April 13 2020 02: 55
                Quote: professor
                Israel-Philistines
                Israel-Jordan

                There are a lot of problems with Israel. Maybe it's not about the British?
            3. 0
              April 11 2020 18: 36
              At the time of the beginning of British penetration (the rest of the Indian company), the Mughal Empire (which arose after the Uzbeks conquered India) was the richest country in the world and India's GDP was much higher than the British
              During colonial exploitation, the British stupidly robbed India.
              The results of this robbery formed the basis of the power of the British crown (of course, the British activity in China, which began after the Opium Wars contributed, China was also richer than Britain then)
              And their infrastructure projects were of importance just for the process of colonial exploitation
              So the civilizational achievements of Britain in India are doubtful
              And you could do without them
              1. Dog
                0
                April 13 2020 02: 58
                Quote: 16329
                Mughal Empire (originated after the curling of India by the Uzbeks)

                Everything is fine in this phrase - from spelling to content.
        2. +1
          April 11 2020 10: 07
          Quote: Amateur
          They were never one country. They were one English colony.

          ==========
          They were just ONE country, and LONG (for thousands of years) before they became a British colony!
          Although in fairness it should be noted that they were never a ONE country! They were always divided into small principalities, often at odds with each other.
        3. 0
          April 11 2020 12: 27
          The language of most Pakistanis and more than half of the Indians is the same, with regional differences. Hindi in India, Urdu in Pakistan. They are mutually understood. In India, by the way, there are almost as many Muslims as the entire population of Pakistan.
          1. +2
            April 11 2020 15: 20
            Even more. Somewhere there was infa that Muslims in India are about 400 million, and the population of Pakistan is about 160 million.
        4. 0
          April 12 2020 14: 01
          The language is quite the same. Different writing
      2. +1
        April 11 2020 07: 34
        they were not one country, both sides were part of the British Empire as colonies, and only, and before that there was feudal fragmentation into many principalities
        1. HDZ
          0
          April 11 2020 10: 03
          Quote: Graz
          they were not one country, both sides were part of the British Empire as colonies, and only, and before that there was feudal fragmentation into many principalities

          The Great Mughals choked on tea now.
        2. +1
          April 11 2020 10: 09
          Quote: Graz
          they were not one country

          ========
          What to say? request Learn History!
        3. 0
          April 11 2020 12: 38
          There was British India as a part of the colonial possessions of Britain (a large part of the population) and dozens of protectorates-principalities (a smaller part of the population) of different sizes, from tiny to huge Hyderabad. At the same time, British India had a single currency rupee, a single customs space. There were colonial troops and troops of the principalities. In the interwar period, British India was a member of the League of Nations. However, the majority of the members of the Indian delegation in the League of Nations were English. And maybe that's all. I don’t remember exactly, there are no materials at hand. Power at the central level was mainly in the hands of the British, with the participation of the Indians with an advisory voice. At the regional level, it was equally divided between the British and Indians. The principalities were under the protectorate of Great Britain and the authorities of British India. Municipal corporations were predominantly in the hands of the Saami Indians.
      3. +2
        April 11 2020 11: 57
        Quote: shubin
        But once it was one country, and now like Ukraine and Russia.

        Tyuyuyu ... yes there are plenty of examples. Moreover, they are so bloody that Ukraine and Russia are children's toys ...
        Serbia - Croatia - Bosnia
        North and South Sudan
        Armenia - Azerbaijan
        Ethiopia - Eritrea
        Well, cherry - North and South Korea
        1. 0
          April 11 2020 16: 18
          Sudan Arabs, South Sudan blacks.
    4. -2
      April 11 2020 07: 33
      India stabbed with 155mm howitzer FH77 Bofors

      Air strikes and missile forces. Artillery fires at individual targets (single or group) or fires at areas of massive fire (several fire attacks at the same time at a particular site).
      1. +1
        April 11 2020 07: 42
        But what
        Plaque, fly, flew - artillery, not a plane.
        What a difficult language.
        1. +4
          April 11 2020 07: 47
          Bandits are not pilots either. However, a raid on the bank commit. laughing
          1. +1
            April 11 2020 10: 21
            Quote: maykl8
            Bandits are not pilots either. However, a raid on the bank commit. laughing

            =========
            "... Tartakovsky in Odessa was called "one and a half w ... a" or "18 raids" .... well, and the nickname! 15 raids "he received because he and his shop survived not 17 or 19, but 18 raids..... "(Babael" Cavalry "). laughing
            PS Tartakovsky, too, was not a pilot!
            PPS How GREAT and MIGHT Russian tongue!
          2. +2
            April 11 2020 12: 00
            Quote: maykl8
            Bandits are not pilots either. However, a raid on the bank commit.

            And there is plaque on the teeth. Enemy, bastard ...
        2. 0
          April 11 2020 08: 59
          Military terminology is gradually taking shape
          Article 27

          During sieges and bombings, all necessary measures must be taken to spare, as far as possible, temples, buildings serving the purposes of science, arts and charity, historical monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, under the condition that such buildings and places did not serve military purposes at the same time.

          The besieged are obligated to designate these buildings and places with special visible signs, of which the besiegers must be informed in advance.

          Documentation of 1907.
          Bombards are no longer in use, bombers have not yet entered, and there have been bombings.
          hi
          1. 0
            April 11 2020 11: 43
            IMHO. The word "bombing" comes from the word "bomb". And "Bombards" and "Bombers" are means of delivering a bomb to a target.
            In the period before the First World War, inclusive bombs were called heavy explosive (in modern terminology - high-explosive and high-explosive fragmentation) artillery shells designed to fire from mortars of all calibers (but not mortars!), Heavy howitzers and heavy guns, as well as naval bomb weapons (however, the latter went out of use in the XNUMXth century)
            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Бомба
            1. 0
              April 11 2020 12: 03
              I think the concept of a bomb is even broader.
              I remember that all sorts of disgruntled bombs were also thrown at the king.
              But the name of the bombardment appeared historically as one of the first names of the guns, not necessarily fired bombs, it was still the 14th century.
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki//Бомбарда
              A bomb is another thing, it’s already a device for throwing bombs.
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Бомбомёт_(полевой)
              But after the advent of airplanes, the term is applied to aviation, but the old concept is preserved in the Convention.
              hi
      2. +1
        April 11 2020 08: 44
        Quote: maykl8
        Air strikes and missile forces. Artillery fires

        An artillery raid (fire raid) is one of the types of modern artillery strike, when a gun quickly fires several shells (up to ten) from different angles and they almost simultaneously fall into the target zone.
        1. +2
          April 11 2020 09: 30
          Quote: Genry
          An artillery raid (fire raid) is one of the types of modern artillery strike, when a gun quickly fires several shells (up to ten) from different angles and they almost simultaneously fall into the target zone.

          No, it's called their MRSI (Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact)
          We have, with the hard hand of translators, Discovery - "Flurry of Fire".
          In the specialized literature, a more adequate term is "pseudo-volley"
        2. +1
          April 11 2020 11: 53
          An artillery raid (fire raid) is one of the types of modern artillery strike, when a gun quickly fires several shells (up to ten) from different angles and they almost simultaneously fall into the target zone.

          There is a department in the Mikhailovsky Military Artillery Academy - “Department of Management rocket attacks и artillery fire". Do you think that the academy is not aware of the terms that they themselves come up with? feel
          1. +1
            April 11 2020 12: 23
            Quote: maykl8
            rocket attacks and artillery fire "

            Just for rockets - only hits
            And artillery has many other fire missions, often extended over time. For example, hours of exhausting fire can hardly be called an "artillery strike"
            1. 0
              April 11 2020 18: 27
              For example, hours of fire exhaustion is difficult to call an "artillery strike"

              There is no such fire. There is a disturbing fire - single shots at one target with an interval of 20-30 minutes to hamper the activities of the enemy. There is a methodical fire - this is fire on the object of attack (Platoon Support Point 6 Hectares). At least two batteries (12 guns) are involved. The first 2-4 shots are fired, and the remaining shots are fired by batteries at a pace providing at least one projectile per hectare every 10 seconds.
              A fire raid is conducted for at least 5 and no more than 20 minutes. If in 20 minutes the target amount of ammunition is not laid out on the Target, then the fire is transferred to another Target, and after 20 minutes back to the "unfinished" one. This is done by the fact that within 5 minutes the most effective defeat of the enemy's manpower is inflicted, and after 20 minutes everyone is already sitting in holes and the fire is ineffective.
              1. 0
                April 11 2020 18: 30
                Quote: maykl8
                There is no such fire.

                "The objectives of shooting to kill may be: destruction, destruction, suppression, and exhaustion. "Article 2 of Part 1 of the Rules of Shooting and Fire Control
          2. 0
            April 11 2020 14: 43
            Quote: maykl8
            Do you think that the academy is not aware of the terms that they themselves come up with?

            If you are so informed, then where are the quotes, links ... - do not be unfounded.
            And I want specifics, and not just your IMHO.
            1. 0
              April 11 2020 18: 08
              Yes please:
              Section "What is the structure of the university"
              https://zen.yandex.ru/media/vzapase_expert/mihailovskaia-voennaia-artilleriiskaia-akademiia-5dfbd5318d5b5f00ad329132 27-й пункт с верху.
              1. 0
                April 12 2020 08: 00
                Quote: maykl8
                Section "What is the structure of the university"

                The answer is unanswered. As if a lawyer, is responding with a letter, with a blank sheet of paper.
                1. 0
                  April 12 2020 08: 28
                  The answer is unanswered. As if a lawyer, is responding with a letter, with a blank sheet of paper.

                  Are you not an American spy? wassat
      3. +2
        April 11 2020 09: 22
        Quote: maykl8
        Artillery fires on individual targets

        Everything is somewhat more complicated. Fire raid along with fire observation relate to the theme of the order of fire to kill
        1. 0
          April 11 2020 12: 04
          Everything is somewhat more complicated. Fire raid along with fire observation relate to the theme of the order of fire to kill

          Everything is just like that. But the end result is a fire raid. Fire observation is some kind of newfangled exotic.
          1. 0
            April 11 2020 12: 16
            Quote: maykl8
            angry observation is some kind of newfangled exoticism.

            On the contrary.
            It's just that earlier they used somewhat different terms, more pretentious. Like "squalls of rapid fire" with "periods of methodical fire" in between
    5. 0
      April 11 2020 07: 42
      to whom war and to whom mother is dear
      will begin and continue, will deepen sales of weapons, etc.
      Wise monkeys look from the side until they are fried
    6. 0
      April 11 2020 07: 55
      These are the ones who can "screw up" the neighbors with nuclear weapons! fool That the Indians, that the Pakistanis, verily, of the same yard of a dog, do not live an hour without a fight! !! fool fool
    7. -1
      April 11 2020 08: 25
      The world has ceased to be afraid of wars, even nuclear ones. Hollywood taught what post-apocalypse is, who likes what, I choose "Mad Max"
    8. +1
      April 11 2020 10: 32
      Conventional war between two nuclear powers.
      Without threats to "incinerate each other with atomic weapons."
      Which means there are brains on both sides! good
    9. 0
      April 11 2020 11: 09
      When it comes to Indian gunners:
      1. 0
        April 12 2020 20: 29
        What a healthy howitzer!
    10. +3
      April 11 2020 11: 28
      Quote: Thrifty
      These are the ones who can "screw up" the neighbors with nuclear weapons! fool That the Indians, that the Pakistanis, verily, of the same yard of a dog, do not live an hour without a fight! !! fool fool

      Since the appearance of their nuclear weapons, there has been one war (Kargalskaya) between them and 8 or 9 border conflicts. And nothing, did not use nuclear weapons. Maybe because each of the parties was smart enough?
    11. 0
      April 11 2020 12: 42
      It is doubtful that the Indian media used the terms "Jammu and Kashmir" or "Jammu and Kashmir State". The state was liquidated and divided into two union territories.
    12. amr
      0
      April 11 2020 12: 52
      Quote: professor
      2. Tell the pioneers about the "bloodless" "annexation" of the Crimea.

      Interesting? where is the blood? in Crimea?
    13. 0
      April 11 2020 14: 58
      A beautifully withered warehouse. But damn the Indians and Pakistanis, the essence is one nation, but faith is different but the roots are the same ... The main thing is that the hand on the button does not flinch anyone ...
    14. 0
      April 11 2020 19: 53
      Quote: Spade
      Quote: maykl8
      There is no such fire.

      "The objectives of shooting to kill may be: destruction, destruction, suppression, and exhaustion. "Article 2 of Part 1 of the Rules of Shooting and Fire Control

      Exhaustion lies in the moral and psychological impact on the enemy’s manpower harassing fire limited amount of artillery and ammunition for a specified time. We, a colleague, are not talking about shooting tasks. Yours faithfully!
    15. 0
      April 12 2020 23: 07
      Quote: Observer2014
      Where the British visited and took control, the blood is still pouring. Burn them in hell.
      Not everywhere. hi It's awesome in the Crimea. There are wonderful weather, I dare to notice you. And so, in principle, yes. Rare fishes are rare. Yes

      @ The brothers rushed ... already zaminusili !!!
      KAAIF laughing
      By the way, right now two military hospitals are building two universal hospitals! good

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"