The network has a video test of the Ukrainian RCC "Neptune"

A video of testing the Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missile appeared on the Web. The video is hosted on the Defense Express Channel on YouTube.

The video shows how a missile is launched from a ground launcher, a missile flies over the sea and a floating target (a lighter with a target net). According to the developers, during the test, a missile with an inert warhead successfully hit a floating target at a distance of 75 km.

As previously reported, the firing took place at the state test site of the Armed Forces of Ukraine "Alibey" in the Odessa region.

According to the data provided by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, on April 2, 2020, the R-360 anti-ship missile of the Ukrainian anti-ship missile complex RK-360MTs "Neptune" with an active homing radar mounted on the missile was first tested. Prior to this, all tests were carried out without a homing head.

It is noted that the complex for the first time independently discovered and hit a target at a distance of 75 kilometers.

As stated in Kiev, an active radar homing missile R-360 creates the Kiev company Radionics LLC, the development of the complex is carried out by the Kiev design bureau Luch.

Nothing is reported on plans for arming the RCC Neptune; there is information that funding for this development was not allocated for 2020.

Comments

[Equalized]

Homing head from "Radionix"

[Sky strike fighter]

But what about intellectual property rights, as Antonov’s design bureau says they like about our An-124s? Or is the X-35 common Soviet times? Well then the An-124 common Soviet times. Just change, change the engines and call the original development Il-124 . And hello. How's the idea?

“Ray” at that time made good money on the development of anti-tank guided missiles. But extra money, as you know, does not happen. Therefore, Korostylev, within the framework of the Neptune Design Bureau, promptly made a project to create a Ukrainian anti-ship missile based on the design of the Soviet X-35 anti-ship missile.

Why on the basis of the "thirty fifth"? Because, from scratch, “Luch” could not do anti-ship missiles - the Ukrainians, who had never issued anti-ship missiles, a priori lacked their own competencies. In addition, a set of production and design documentation for the X-35 was found in the Ukrainian bins very timely, which was transferred to the Kharkov Aviation Plant in the years of the USSR. Finally, the X-35 itself was not the last fashion by the standards of 2014, but in terms of its combined performance characteristics it still looked very good.

Recall that the X-35 tests started in 1983. The subsonic low-altitude “thirty-fifth” development of the Zvezda Design Bureau was intended for the destruction of ships with a displacement of up to 5000 tons. The latest modifications of the "thirty-fifth" got a range of up to 260 km. As part of the Uranus missile systems, the Kh-35 anti-ship missiles could be used by shipborne carriers. The Bal coastal missile systems used a land-based modification of the rocket. It was also envisaged the possibility of using the X-35 aircraft and helicopters. In general, to make on the basis of the Soviet backlog the same Ukrainian anti-ship "universal" was extremely tempting ...

https://riafan.ru/1168501-ukrainskaya-raketa-neptun-do-sevastopolya-ne-doletit

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Southern

what is the problem of increasing the range of the rocket, for a long time the Russian Federation will console itself with similar headlines, kindergarten!

In the sense of comforting yourself? Explain. About the range I did not say anything.

[Fmax]

The article is not so much about range, but generally about rocket problems. And how can a test sample reach Sevastopol?

[Katanikotael]

wow, how masterly they all past problems with accuracy under the carpet swept - there was no guidance head!

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Katanikotael

wow, how masterly they all past problems with accuracy under the carpet swept - there was no guidance head!

So these are also those cunning seafarers.

[Bshkaus]

So, now I have a serious question for those who are associated with the navy.
What say
On the one hand, the rocket formally passed over the barge and did not hit its base.
On the other hand, this grid seems to be a marker-dimension of the ship’s add-ons; accordingly, it could also be dismantled, and statistics need to be collected in dozens of launches.
Again, nobody assigns one missile to a target; accordingly, two pieces would have already disabled the ship with a high degree of probability. In my opinion, this is success.
PS Emotional patriots who do not have the proper education and qualifications with comments like "Ukraine does not know how to do anything, everything is past again", please do not bother with comments, your opinion in this case does not interest me, but you can be satisfied with giving me a minus.

[Equalized]

It was not planned to get into the barge. Specially shoot at the grid (reflector) so as not to sink the barge. Cost savings. Each time during testing a new barge is not a good idea, especially for a poor country like Ukraine. Your cap.

[Bshkaus]

It was not planned to get into the barge

Thank you, I intuitively understood, especially looking at the "things" hanging on the grid, between which the missile hit, but I'm not a naval one, so I had to clarify to improve my own horizons.)))

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Equalized

It was not planned to get into the barge. Specially shoot at the grid (reflector) so as not to sink the barge. Cost savings. Each time during testing a new barge is not a good idea, especially for a poor country like Ukraine. Your cap.

Of course, it wasn’t planned. As it’s not planned to take Neptune into service, as it’s all for blowing dust, you’ll see how terrible we are, but as tests we didn’t plan to hit the barge, on another test a jamb so that Neptune didn’t fly there They explained that it was planned, and most importantly, those who really know the state of affairs on this project are well aware that this is a fake, therefore they do not plan to buy, since there is nothing to buy.

Nothing is reported on plans for arming the RCC Neptune; there is information that funding for this development was not allocated for 2020.

Even copy X-35U is not able.

[Holgerton]

But is it that the EPR of corner reflectors is obviously higher than the EPR of the barge / lighter / target ship?) Just because they imitate a superstructure.
And these same reflectors are precisely the targets, and a barge or some other ship is needed to achieve the required stability, you can even have them on rubber boats.
Look at the online video of the shooting of the same Harpoons, Exocet, LRASM, if you're lucky, you might find the Soviet somewhere, though it's mostly just a photo.
You are such an expert from yourself, but you don’t know elementary things)

[svp67]

Quote: Holgerton

if you are lucky, then maybe you will find the Soviet somewhere, though mostly only a photo.

[Holgerton]

Thank you, I completely forgot something about "Bastion".

[venik]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Even copy X-35U is not able.

=========
So after all, they copied (for 15 years) .... But with serial production - it looks like a "pipe" (especially - with massive) !.

[Reserve buildbat]

The fact of the matter is that they did not copy it. We made a worsened version. Just compare the characteristics of the X-35 and this Whisperer. Especially dimensions and weight

[alexmach]

But with serial production - it looks like a "pipe" (especially - with mass production)!

And how massive should it be for you to create problems for Russia in the Black Sea?

[Dart2027]

Quote: alexmach

And how massive

Let's compare with "Ball".
In one connection 4 cars with 8 launchers, that is 32 missiles in a salvo. Plus TPM with a reserve of missiles for another salvo. Total 64 missiles.
This is just one connection.

[alexmach]

Let's compare with "Ball".

So what? let's compare with the "bastion", there is generally a supersonic rocket. So what? Well, Bali and Bastion are cooler (Although, of course, the Ball is more analogous, but it does not matter). So what?

How does this reduce the threat from missiles in the arsenal of Ukraine?

I have already cited an example of an incident in the Kerch Strait, here you also recall the incidents at the drilling sites when the TFR drove Ukrainian floating equipment from oil rigs. Can he do the same just as easily if there is at least a coastal complex within the radius of which he falls?

But imagine a situation like that same naval battle in the war on 08.08.08/6/XNUMX, just imagine XNUMX obscure Georgian pelvis, but those same Priluki and Islands armed with these missiles. Can one RTO protect them from the convoy, and even just anti-aircraft missiles?

Well, let's say the Ball is cooler, and then what?

[Dart2027]

Quote: alexmach

So what? let's compare with the "bastion", there is generally a supersonic rocket.

You asked what can be considered mass production? I cited as an example the number of missiles of similar dimensions in one division of the Russian Armed Forces.

Quote: alexmach

I have already cited the example of an incident in the Kerch Strait

Well, we didn’t have cruisers there either, so 30-mm guns of Ukrainian boats could well sink the same border guards. However, this did not happen.

Quote: alexmach

How does this reduce the threat from missiles in the arsenal of Ukraine?

There are two questions to the threat from Ukraine:
1) Quality (hitting a target is one thing, but hitting a warship is a little different).
2) Quantity (1 missile is 1 missile and the maximum that it can hit this 1 target, but 100 missiles is a completely different matter).
Well, Ukraine has been a potential threat for a long time, and not only for the Black Sea Fleet.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Let's compare with "Ball".
In one connection 4 cars with 8 launchers, that is 32 missiles in a salvo. Plus TPM

so the Ukrainian DBK has a similar structure, however, smaller missiles - 24 ready to launch. The school is one, Soviet.

[rocket757]

There are two reasonable options.
1. The saving of the rocket (layout) will then be picked up and checked.
2. Saving a target ... here it is clear.
You can program anything and above the target, in height. And under the target ... joke.
Choose an option.

[shark]

Unfortunately, this is a success. And that's bad. After all, the main goal for Neptune is the ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Yes they don’t hide it

[Bashkirkhan]

They can also destroy the border patrol ship. "Firefly" some sort.

[Thrifty]

The problem is solved by creating an anti-missile defense corvette based on the same Karakurt!

[Piramidon]

Passenger planes shot down. Now passenger ships will be heated.

[rocket757]

Fortunately, this is nothing ...
Why don't they fly? Scary and dangerous!
Why do not shoot and climb? Because the answer will not be long in coming and here no regrets / concerns from beyond the hill will not help them.

[Peter is not the first]

Scary? I agree. But it is scary to hit at us those who remained adequate, and then there are plenty of inadequate power, so it is desirable that the "yellow house patients" do not have a club in their hands, but no matter how much we want, they are developing clubs. Good or bad, few or many, but they already have them and this must be taken into account.

[rocket757]

Serious weapons are controlled, aimed by more than one face, of trained personnel. There are more chances, there will be a more reasonable or preoccupied link, unit.
However, we don’t need to yawn either ... how warm, always be on the alert!

[Peter is not the first]

I'm not talking about calculating weapons, but about leadership.

[rocket757]

This issue is not resolved in advance. Everyone knows that they have to answer, almost always ... Maybe they can afford to gang up the biggest, but this is not the option. A gangster cheater, for which no one will stand up, if sho.
The feeling of self-preservation still sometimes manifests itself, oh / W / which is not iron. They sent their pelvis to the "breakthrough", but no one dared to pull the trigger.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: shark

Unfortunately, this is a success. And that's bad. After all, the main goal for Neptune is the ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Yes they don’t hide it

What is the success if you didn’t hit the barge?

[shark]

And the barge did not have to hit. So, in principle, the full-time target looks like. A taut grid imitates a ship’s superstructure. So they did it all.

[venik]

Quote: shark

Unfortunately, this is a success. And that's bad. After all, the main goal for Neptune is the ships of the Black Sea Fleet of Russia

=======
Don't worry like that! Well, they copied, well, it works .... In order for them to pose a serious threat, large-scale SERIAL production is necessary, and until then it comes - ooh, how much "water will leak"! For this, there is still not enough money, no production capacity, no qualified production personnel ... AND WHEN all this will be found (and whether there will be at all) -

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Bshkaus

but you can be satisfied by putting me a minus.

Dreamed

[dvina71]

Quote: Bshkaus

In my opinion, this is success.

This success has been almost 30 years since ..

And work on this topic began in 1984 ...

[Holgerton]

Do not remind when it was adopted?
And then I look in google and am amazed that for some reason not 30 years ago, when the main light anti-ship missiles were Mosquito and Termit.

[dvina71]

Quote: Holgerton

Do not remind when it was adopted?

Let me tell you .. in 2003, the x-35 missile was adopted in Russia .. although it was fully tested back in 1995 .. ok 20 launches ..
This missile has already been modernized and the destruction range has been increased to 260 km in the export version ..
Mosquito light RCC? 4 tons .. and X-35..600kg ..

[Holgerton]

Well, excuse me, that 4 tons, Soviet industry gave what it was, but there were no alternatives.

[Grigory_45]

Formally - the defeat of the ship. The missile passed clearly over the target, it was possible that it wasn’t planned to hit the hull (for the reusability of the target) Although the rocket was inert equipment, then, perhaps, it would have to fight for the survivability of the target (the missile could leave a hole, cause a fire, etc. .)
Target ships are often a barge structure with nets, reflectors, etc. hung on it.

although, of course, such pictures are more visual)

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Gregory_45

Target ships are often a barge structure with nets, reflectors, etc. hung on it.

And in this case the same
Look carefully, the grid is clearly visible

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Lipchanin

the mesh is clearly visible

by itself. I watched the video carefully. Defeat the target.

[sabakina]

I never understood why to beat in a superstructure? For me, you need to beat at the level of the waterline. At the same time, fire and water are a terrible force.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Bshkaus

Emotional patriots who do not have proper education and qualifications with comments like "Ukraine does not know how to do anything, again everything is bypassed", please do not bother with comments, your opinion in this case does not interest me, but you can be satisfied with giving me a minus.

And no one is bothered, a serial Soviet missile with a homing head made on the basis of Soviet developments in Ukraine by the former Soviet KB Luch! Fso!

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

with a homing head made on the basis of Soviet developments in Ukraine by the former Soviet design bureau Luch

in Soviet times, KB Luch GOS did not develop. Active head ARGS-35 for X-35 was developed by NPO Leninets (Leningrad)

[neri73-r]

Quote: Gregory_45

Quote: neri73-r

with a homing head made on the basis of Soviet developments in Ukraine by the former Soviet design bureau Luch

in Soviet times, KB Luch GOS did not develop. Active head ARGS-35 for X-35 was developed by NPO Leninets (Leningrad)

The name KB - “BEAM” - is an abbreviation and stands for “Logically Managed Part”

The KB has always had competencies in guided weapons!

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

The KB has always had competencies in guided weapons!

In Soviet times, the Design Bureau was engaged in the creation of automated monitoring and diagnostics systems for aircraft missiles and sea torpedoes. The weapon or its components KB did not design
And even more so, it has nothing to do with the creation of ARGS-35

[neri73-r]

Quote: Gregory_45

The weapon or its components KB did not design

It (KB) worked with them. It is impossible to diagnose, for example, GOS without knowing how it works and works.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

Quote: Gregory_45

The weapon or its components KB did not design

It (KB) worked with them. It is impossible to diagnose, for example, GOS without knowing how it works and works.

knowing how it works is one thing, doing it yourself is another. I also know how the ARGSN works and how it works, but I definitely can’t calculate and design it. Competencies are a combination of knowledge, experience and skills.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Gregory_45

I also know how the ARGSN works and how it works, but I definitely can’t calculate and design it. Competencies are a combination of knowledge, experience and skills.

I will not argue with you, since I’m not an engineer. But, there are many examples of re-designing design bureaus that coped with the new task of old and young engineering personnel. The same Tula design bureau from aircraft guns to (when set the task) high-precision weapons.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

But, there are a lot of examples of re-designing design bureaus that coped with a new task by old and young engineering personnel

The head for Neptune was developed by NPO Radioniks, created in 2006, and having very little experience in developing ARLGSN - only for the modernization of R-27 air-to-air missiles

[Dart2027]

Quote: neri73-r

there are a lot of examples of re-designing design bureaus that coped with a new task by old and young engineering personnel

If they were helped by expert advice and access to relevant documentation. Without this, too, it is possible, but for a long time.

[Alexey from Perm]

I am a patriot of Russia, but the video shows successful missile tests, the target is hit. The ukrov got their weapons, and this is dangerous.

[dvina71]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

The ukrov got their weapons, and this is dangerous.

It happened when we conducted all the tests, adopted them, put them in the army. They sent them defense lines, taught the operators how to use weapons ... Where did the Ukrainians advance?

[Alexey from Perm]

I agree in that part that it’s a big job to put into service, and the longer they do it the better. But as such a rocket appeared, this is a fact. We also got Armata, but has not yet come into service and is unlikely to appear ...

[dvina71]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

We also got Armata, but has not yet come into service and is unlikely to appear ...

You definitely will not appear. And in our country, the Moscow Region has already concluded a contract with UVZ for 150 ++ cars on the Armat platform .. almost a year ago.

Quote: Alexey from Perm

But as such a rocket appeared, this is a fact.

Such a rocket appeared in 1995 .. and only now they were able to reproduce something .., with what characteristics .. taking into account the general degradation of science and industry in Nenko .. I would not be seduced

[Alexey from Perm]

Quote: dvina71

I would not flatter myself
Reply

I wouldn’t flatter myself about Almaty

[Grigory_45]

Quote: dvina71

Such a rocket appeared in 1995.

They could get acquainted with the X-35 missile in Ukraine only in 2002. In Russia, the missile was adopted in 2003.

[Oleg Shulga]

Formally, it was planned.
Not formally -
1. The rocket flew for the first time at the beginning of 2018 ... moreover, these were throwing tests, the launch accelerator from S-125 was actually tested.
2. Ukraine never made a GOS and inertial for such products, and it did not have access to the same GOS from x-35
3. tests of the rocket itself (as a full-fledged flying thing capable of flying a certain distance of -250+ km) were completed in November 2019.
4. Now tests are being carried out to actually verify the operation of the GOS and the real possibility of defeating at least surface targets. So far there has been only one launch at a modest 75 km
5. In the last tests, 3 missiles were actually tested, but there was only one launch for the target. The remaining 2 worked out other tasks - flying at very low altitudes along a complex path with checking the inertial, positioning system and altimeter.
6. According to the plan, the completion of GOSov and the adoption of the Armed Forces of the RCC Neptune is planned for this year.
7. In general, the money for testing and production is very allocated, they just go to another article, which under normal conditions means the purchase of serial products. There is a jamb and the difficulty with the fact that the tests are not completed and if suddenly problems arise with the rocket, then ... the manufacturer will have other problems as well.
8. if everything goes without jambs, the first (at the end of the year) will accept the coastal version of Neptune (all nishtyaki such as the installations themselves, the radar and other things are very tested in parallel, it’s just not so screaming about all the media, it’s not spectacular like launches rockets). The ship version will be released no less than 2 years later and the current after that should have been air (planned for 2024)

[Sergey Kazarinov]

From the point of view of the success of the test shooting, the hit is a credit for the five. If you rummage around on yuotube, you can see that during the tests of the X-35, the missile also passes through the mesh above the deck of the BCS (and not the barge). The radar center of the target is raised when the missile is aimed at it with the help of reflective corners. How a combat missile hits a target depends on the size and configuration of the target's RCS. There were no examples of the combat use of the Kh-35. It seems that the likely point of entry of the rocket into the target will be the deck-superstructure area. On the purpose of missiles in a salvo: it all depends on the type of target: if a boat or another ship is less than 500 tons displacement, then in a salvo there are 1-2 missiles. For targets, the corvette-frigate - from 2 to 4 in a salvo. Not professionally noted by you "the missile did not hit the base." What are you talking about? If we talk about such anti-ship missiles, then even judging by the video about the approach of the rocket to the target, then its flight was carried out at a height of 2-3 m, which ensures it hits the side or the superstructure area above the deck. It all depends on the conditions I mentioned above. As for the remark about the hurray-patriots, I will nevertheless express the opinion that Ukraine really does not know how to do much in the current conditions. This rocket is an analogue, a clone (especially in terms of the airframe, not to mention the Motor Sich engine, it is native to the X-35 and this clone), because the independent one has never been involved in the development and production of such missiles. I think that things with Neptune will not go beyond these steps, there are many examples of this. Remember the advertised missile corvette, project 58250, which is still (for almost 10 years) on the stocks of the Nikolaev shipyard, as an example of unfinished construction, carelessness and theft of the state. money

[dvina71]

Quote: Sergey Kazarinov

There were no examples of combat use of the X-35.

What is this?

[Cowbra]

for 2020, funding for this development has not been allocated.

God did not give horns to a vigorous cow

[Bshkaus]

God did not give horns to a vigorous cow

Just gave: the target is hit, the product meets the stated requirements. The completion of OCD can be considered successful. Further state tests and adoption. This is a completely different expense item.

[Cowbra]

... the article is different, but there is no money

[Bshkaus]

See:
Article on VO dated 03.02.18 "Ukraine in ten years will have a real threat to Russia"
excerpt from the article:

Russian politicians took the news from Kiev with irony. The Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense, General Vladimir Shamanov, regarded the statement of Kiev politicians as nothing more than “propaganda”.

ibid.

And his first deputy, General Viktor Zavarzin, called for treating such messages with humor.

Sivkov distinguished himself in that article

I do not see the material and technical base in Ukraine in order to create such a missile, ”concluded Sivkov.

The comments were hee hee, yes haha.
Then there were many more articles in the same vein.
I want to note that the past is not 10 years old, but the problem of the material and technical base for creating such a rocket somehow suddenly appeared.
Let's see what Sivkov will say on the pages of the military-industrial complex.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Bshkaus

I want to note that the past is not 10 years old, but the problem of the material and technical base for creating such a rocket somehow suddenly appeared.

Neptune is an attempt to create our X-35 Uranus. The only question is whether it can hit besides the grid remains open. RCC must be able to overcome missile defense and electronic warfare, and not just fly, and this is where the questions begin.

[alexmach]

RCC must be able to overcome missile defense and electronic warfare, and not just fly

yeah .. especially missile defense and electronic warfare of 50-year-old ships of the Black Sea Fleet ...
There is a reality, they have apparently brought their version of the X-35 to mind, or they will finish it in the near future. What would the same incident in the Kerch Strait look like if Ukraine, in addition to shells, could use ground anti-ship missiles? What will happen if these anti-ship missiles are armed with boats, at least the same Priluki and decommissioned American ones?

[Dart2027]

Quote: alexmach

ABM and EW 50-year-old ships of the Black Sea Fleet

Project 11356 frigates? RTO project 22800?

Quote: alexmach

There is a given their version of the X-35, they apparently brought to mind, or in the near future will bring.

Whether there is a? So far, all their attempts to create new weapons have not been very successful.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: alexmach
ABM and EW 50-year-old ships of the Black Sea Fleet

Project 11356 frigates? RTO project 22800?

no matter how modern the ship is, do you think that the RCC does not pose a threat to it? Moreover, Neptune, it must be understood, is not the ancient P-15, but an analogue of the still quite effective Uranus. With the ability to work on ground targets.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

no matter how modern the ship is, do you think that the RCC does not pose a threat to it?

Depends on whether she can get into it.

Quote: Gregory_45

this is not the ancient P-15, but an analogue of the still quite effective Uranus.

That's just the point, that analog. Ukrainian.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Depends on whether she can get into it.

a missile carries a potential threat. Is always. For any ship. Whether a ship can repel an attack depends on many factors and is estimated by probability. Which is never equal to one. Just like an attacking rocket, the probability of hitting is not 1

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

a missile carries a potential threat. Is always

Any weapon carries a potential threat. An example of a boat with explosives and the destroyer of the United States. But one thing is the threat that if 4 missiles are fired, then one will hit with a probability close to 1, and another thing if 10 missiles are fired and the probability of hitting 0.01. The fact that a lot of the USSR was left behind in Ukraine is a fact, the question is what they can do now.

[alexmach]

Project 11356 frigates?

Are these those who are practically without air defense of the near zone? .. No, these will probably be taken off, already from a single missile so precisely ... And from any serious volley?

ISC project 22800

Some of which are without air defense, some are not all foreshortening Shell.

But these are new ships, and besides them there is still a lot of old ones available.

ships of the project 1135 - this and to repel a single missile will already be an achievement.
+ BDK,
+ a bunch of Buyans, who, although violent, are "naked like a falcon" in air defense
+ Lightning
+ Albatrosses
What about the anti-piracy miracle 22160? in the amount of 6 pieces

Most of the Black Sea Fleet ships for these missiles are just targets.

[Dart2027]

Quote: alexmach

And from any serious salvo?

But what is considered a serious salvo? Any air defense can be overloaded with a mass of missiles.

Quote: alexmach

Some of which are without air defense

In fact, there is air defense on everyone, but the first 2 are not Shell, but 30 mm, as on other ships, except 22160.
And for that matter, I wrote that there is more than one Soviet legacy that is 40-50 years old.
But I do not believe in the possibility of the Ukrainian defense industry. Just because all of their new developments have always ended in zilch and corpses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

[alexmach]

But what is considered a serious salvo? Any air defense can be overloaded with a mass of missiles.

Well, at least the same 4 missiles allowed on one installation from different directions? What about 8?

and 30 mm, as on other ships, except 22160

There is still an Wasp on the remaining ships, but that Wasp, that 30 mm guns are most likely to be useless even against subsonic anti-ship missiles.

But I do not believe in the possibility of the Ukrainian defense industry.

Discussing issues of personal faith rather than facts is a fairly expected turn in such an emotional topic.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

The only question is whether it can hit besides the grid remains open

no, the question is already closed. The rocket confidently hit the target.

Quote: Dart2027

Neptune is an attempt to create our X-35 "Uranus"

this is an attempt to make an analogue of the modernized X-35U

[Avior]

In my opinion, it is more correct to say that both the Kh-35U and Neptune are missiles based on the Soviet X-35, which were not initially produced in their designed form.
both that and another differ from the original X-35 range, guidance system, Neptune-sized in addition.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

The rocket confidently hit the target.

Having overcome electronic warfare and air defense?

Quote: Gregory_45

an attempt to make an analogue of the modernized X-35U

I forgot the letter "y", but the essence remains the same.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Having overcome electronic warfare and air defense?

do not write nonsense. Test launches are carried out using electronic warfare and trying to shoot down a rocket?

Based on the available information, Neptune, like the X-35U, has a dual-band ARLGSN capable of operating in conditions of electronic countermeasures. As for air defense, how lucky it is - even though the rocket and subsonic (speed of about 1000 km / h), but in the final section goes very low above sea level, at an altitude of 3 to 10 meters.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

Test launches are carried out using electronic warfare and trying to bring down a rocket

Not in trials, but in life, this is what she will have to do.

Quote: Gregory_45

has dual-band ARLGSN

Question from where? From the Soviet backlog? Then a little outdated. New? And whose development?

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: Gregory_45
Test launches are carried out using electronic warfare and trying to bring down a rocket
Not in trials, but in life, this is what she will have to do.

in this case, we are commenting on the trials, not the combat use. And that’s why I write hit the target, not the target

Quote: Dart2027

And whose development?

this issue has been clarified earlier here. Developed by the Ukrainian Research and Production Enterprise "Radionix". The X-35U is equipped with ARGS-35 from the St. Petersburg NPP "Radar mms". The heads are even outwardly different.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

we comment on trials, not combat use

The tests have passed, no one argues with this. The question is what this rocket is capable of under real conditions.

Quote: Gregory_45

Developed by the Ukrainian Research and Production Enterprise "Radionix".

That's it, that's what this is about.

Quote: Dart2027

From the Soviet backlog? Then a little outdated.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: Dart2027
From the Soviet backlog? Then a little outdated.

what does the Soviet hurt? You do not understand what is written? Then - look for information yourself.
Ukraine did not have documentation on ARLGSN missiles X-35

And, do I understand correctly, do you consider the domestic head obsolete? What is this bold statement based on?

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

what does the Soviet hurt?

Despite the fact that until now all attempts to create something of their own in Ukraine did not end very well. ARLGSN is a very complicated thing and I wonder where they got it from, and for some reason it seems that it was from a warehouse from the times of the USSR where it was delivered for installation on the first X-35s.

Quote: Gregory_45

And, do I understand correctly, do you consider the domestic head obsolete?

With the development of science and technology, everything becomes obsolete. Accordingly, the "heads" that are on missiles made now and those that were put 30 years ago on the first X-35 are not the same thing.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Dart2027

Despite the fact that until now all attempts to create something of their own in Ukraine did not end very well.

a lot has been developed, a lot - at a decent level. They successfully sell ATGMs, upgrade air-to-air missiles (including replacing GOS)

Quote: Dart2027

ARLGSN is a very complicated thing and I wonder where they got it from, and for some reason it seems that from the warehouse of the USSR, where it was delivered for installation on the first X-35

only the characteristics of the GOS and the control system are more consistent with those installed on the X-35U (first missiles - 2009-2010) than on the X-35. It can also be assumed that the head for the GOS Neptune was taken from the S-200 missile

What the Ukrainians borrowed from the Soviet rocket is the motor (probably, slightly podshamaniv it). TRDD-50 was produced in Ukraine until the collapse of the USSR

[Dart2027]

Quote: Gregory_45

a lot has been developed, a lot - at a decent level

For some reason, all that I had to read about their development is that they even managed to spoil the Kalash.

Quote: Gregory_45

It can also be assumed that the head for the GOS Neptune was taken from the S-200 missile

That's it, I wrote about this. The S-200 was put into service in 1967. And is this an advanced development?

[Cowbra]

And, as I understand it, a half-century-old missile that exists in one (that is, sorry, no longer existing at all) is a threat to Russia. For which there is no money. The threat to Russia is oil and gas, which they found there in 2014, they promised to fill Europe with them, only not to sell to Russia - hi, their sons will die from sansctions!
And a missile flying over 75 km is a threat, yes ... It can break the net, that's why they tested it. The Fourth Reich's Nether Weapon! Fishermen, you Khan!
Let first learn how to make CARTRIDGES. And not pistol on machines of the beginning of the last century, as it is now

[alexmach]

I would not seriously count on "no money" or "only 75 km". It is obvious that what kind of water area could be closed for testing in such and tested. It is necessary to proceed from the fact that in the next couple of years they will produce a couple of coastal complexes and also equip their boats with these missiles, and then they will be able to very seriously spoil the Black Sea Fleet in the Black Sea, at least constantly diverting significant forces and resources to themselves, at least threatening combat ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

[Cowbra]

A rocket is expensive to manufacture, all the more so they can only make a piece - it will be even more expensive from this. What, nafig "to arm the boats", whom, Centaurs? A machine gun barely clings to him, the launcher will drown him right away, and again - where is the money for this - I wrote at the top not in vain - there is no money to rivet machine-gun cartridges, and you are talking about missiles, complexes!

[alexmach]

A missile in production is expensive, all the more so they can only do it piece by piece - it will be even more expensive from this.

Piece 20 even in a screwdriver assembly? What do you think pull? Why would they mass produce it at all?

What, nafig "to arm the boats", whom, Centaurs?

Um .. Well, the notorious "Priluki - missile boat without missiles"?
The same islands donated by America? There are already 2 of them in stock and about 4 more are being negotiated. Three times more of your "kintavr" if that.

[Cowbra]

How many ax? Lam? 1 rocket, and flow. So this will be - 5, plus the launch, fasteners on the boat, some kind of detection ... Everything, I did not believe it. Do you understand that they have points in good condition - there was not enough money before the civil war? !!! As they burst into the suburbs of Kiev, they forbade them to shoot at exercises even because no dough for that even. SchA war sucked the last - where do they get Lyam 50-100 for one launcher for Priluk? !!!

[alexmach]

How many ax? Lam? 1 rocket, and flow.

Ax? why immediately an ax? much more logical to compare with the X-35 no? And the characteristics are close and the production is just not particularly massive.
And how much does it cost? And for yourself in rubles and not for export?

where will they get Lyam 50-100 for one launcher for Priluk? !!!

how many missiles did you count? twenty?

[Cowbra]

Launcher-fasteners-detection-and at least a couple of missiles. There are a hundred, IMHO, a little! For myself, not for myself, I’m saying that it will be more expensive than an Ax rather than cheaper! Twist a piece. It always has been. Plus, yes, the Ax is garbage, there is RCC, it has guidance more expensive than land, consider a kamikaze plane with homing and autopilot ...

[alexmach]

Launcher-fasteners

Compared to NIKOR, what about the price of a rocket - count for free

detection

This, by the way, is the first serious question.

There are a hundred, IMHO, a little!

Millions of dollars? On one boat? You are an indefatigable dreamer.

will be more expensive than an ax than cheaper!

Well, it can’t be more expensive than the Ax in any way. X-35 is not more expensive? The price of human labor in Ukraine is low. Access to any imported element base is easy.

Twist by the piece

Five times? This will never happen. Moreover, RCC in any case is not mass production in thousands of pieces.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Cowbra

How many ax? Lam? 1 rocket, and flow

you’ve been robust so compared medium-range anti-ship missiles with SLCMs))
If you compare - then with the Russian X-35 or the American Harpoon. Uranus rocket costs about 20 million rubles. Money not transcendental for the state

[Cowbra]

Well, if so, then yes. But again it is unclear - and there is no such money? No, not my words

[PalBor]

This is a very correct observation. This test was carried out on the balance of the 2019 budget. For 2020, no money has been allocated even for revision either for Neptune or Vilhu-M. And, as it is not a shame to admit, their design bureau "Luch" was able to create good and dangerous missiles on a Soviet basis. But there in Ukroboronprom Abromavichus and Co rule, well-known "magicians", so ... As we have in the 90s. There are ideas and products, no money. Better Czech BMPs, worth 20 thousand euros for 205 thousand euros we will buy.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Bshkaus

Just gave: the target is hit, the product meets the stated requirements. The completion of OCD can be considered successful. Further state tests and adoption.

A waste of money, just for public relations! From a military point of view, this is a useless thing and money thrown away. Nobody will buy it from foreign customers. For its own aircraft, it is not needed, since there are practically no carriers. The Armed Forces of Ukraine need it only for the purpose of fighting us, but for this, missiles need to have more than one hundred, which again comes down to money.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

For its aircraft, it is not needed, since there are practically no carriers

why not? There is a coastal complex (it was shot from it), by analogy with the Soviet X-35 Neptune can even be put on small ships (boats), aircraft can also serve as carriers (from jet fighters to patrol An-26s and helicopters)
In your place would not be so categorical.

Quote: neri73-r

The Armed Forces of Ukraine need it only for the purpose of fighting us, but for this missiles it is necessary to have not one hundred

they will not fight with us. And they can do it. Moreover, in any case, the General Staff will react to the emergence of new weapons in Ukraine, which will delay additional forces and funds in the region

[rocket757]

She died, she died ... convulsions are not considered life.

[Equalized]

KB - the developer of this rocket is more alive than all living things. Hundreds of ATGMs and thousands of missiles are delivered to them both abroad and in the Armed Forces. One of the few enterprises in the military-industrial complex of Ukraine that works well and breathes.

[rocket757]

One small enterprise, for an economy not a small country. Do you think this is a solution to the problem? Well, well, fresh tradition.

[APASUS]

Nothing is reported on plans for arming the RCC Neptune; there is information that funding for this development was not allocated for 2020.

As I understand it, the developer carries out all R&D and tests at his own expense, in the hope of purchasing the Ukrainian Defense Ministry?

[Equalized]

In 2019, the program was funded from the budget of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. In 2020, they plan some fraud with state guarantees, that is, they will finance not directly through the budget, but through other channels. Let's see what happens.

[voyaka uh]

If the rocket turned out normal, then it can be exported.

[neri73-r]

Quote: voyaka uh

If the rocket turned out normal, then it can be exported.

Will you buy It’s clear that they themselves have a mustache, and after a well-known company selling tanks from Ukraine no one will buy anything! Maybe if only some Honduras or Gabon and a half missiles! Well, from under the floors the most infamous non-democratic regimes ..... documentation will be taken.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

nobody will buy anything from Ukraine! Maybe if only some Honduras or Gabon and a half missiles!

The UAE and Saudi Arabia, for example, cooperate with Ukraine. For the latter, they developed OTRK Thunder. Neptune can also offer, as a cheap replacement for Harpoons

[neri73-r]

Quote: Gregory_45

Neptune can also offer, as a cheap replacement for Harpoons

Cool, American Harpoons to Ukrainian Neptune change !!!! Who will allow them ???? Yankees, what, idiots? Yes, naivety is not a sign of stupidity, but a purity of the soul! (C) In what world do you live? Who will give them profit? Where did you see that the servants of the owner were pressed

[Grigory_45]

those countries are not very interested in the Americans what weapons they should buy. Although completely loyal to Washington. But loyal - does not mean on the position of slaves. They have both Russian and French weapons. If it is in their interests, Neptune will also be bought, in any case, it will be cheaper than Garpunov, with similar characteristics

[neri73-r]

Blessed is he who believes!

[neri73-r]

Quote: Gregory_45

The UAE and Saudi Arabia, for example, cooperate with Ukraine. For the latter, they developed OTRK Thunder.

There, cooperation consists in the development and transfer of documentation! Schasss, Ukraine will produce, and the Emirates and the SA to buy, fled! Technology transfer and nothing personal.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: neri73-r

There, cooperation consists in the development and transfer of documentation! Schasss, Ukraine will produce, and the Emirates and the SA to buy, fled! Technology transfer and nothing personal.

CA, will not produce OTRK. She has neither competencies nor the desire to expand production. Arabs will buy ready-made systems and missiles.

[Mebius]

They are being prepared by the State Department for provocations against Russia .. Well, nothing, as if these missiles didn’t dunk themselves or their masters (the course of the rocket could change, etc.))))

Quote: APASUS

As I understand it, the developer carries out all R&D and tests at his own expense, in the hope of purchasing the Ukrainian Defense Ministry?

You understand correctly and that if anything can be blamed on them for anything .. Who finances this is a tricky question!

[Karaul73]

Quote: Cowbra

... the article is different, but there is no money

Yes, it’s just the money. Everyone pays a military fee.

[slipped]

AK-630M-2 him (Neptune ) in du ... u

[Termit1309]

Quote: voyaka uh

If the rocket turned out normal, then it can be exported.

If any country is interested and gives money for revision and mass production, then maybe.

[Avior]

missile range and navigation verification

December 5, 2018 Checking the missile's range, control and guidance accuracy. Destroyed target at a distance of 280 km

Testing the launch, navigation and missile control system in the middle of the flight

April 5, 2019 Regular tests of the rocket and verification of the operation of the launcher based on the Kraz vehicle.
The missile flew 225 km along a complex path, dropping from 300 to 10 meters.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Нептун_(крылатая_ракета)
from the X-35, by the way, the missile is different in size, control system and the ability to attack ground targets.

Financing of the Neptune program in 2020 is provided in full. At the same time, the purchase of Vilha missiles was planned in accordance with program indicators - within the allocated funds. This is stated in the press service of the Ministry of Defense ... The purchase of infantry fighting vehicles in 2020 will be carried out in volumes according to commercial proposals for imports, taking into account the fact that the arsenal of the armed forces is equipped with samples of the former USSR. In 2020, deliveries of more than 70 unmanned aerial systems are planned in accordance with the needs identified by the General Staff.

https://www.unian.net/weapons/10880705-v-minoborony-razyasnili-situaciyu-vokrug-finansirovaniya-neptuna-i-vilha.html
although earlier some did say that the funding would be according to the system that exists for the purchase of serial equipment, under state guarantees.

[Sky strike fighter]

from the X-35, by the way, the missile is different in size, control system and the ability to attack ground targets.

The size is yes. The latest version of the X-35U can work on ground targets. In Syria, the X-35U missile hit ground targets.

During the operation in Syria, Russian Su-34 front-line bombers launched X-35 missiles against terrorists.

Video of the defeat of the X-35U ground target at the link below.
https://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/1079634.html

The decision that the Kh-35U will be included in the Su-35S weapons set was made in early September. The Kh-35U missile can attack ground targets, including heavily fortified enemy positions, warehouses, and mobile military equipment. This goes beyond what her predecessor, the X-35 cruise missile, was capable of.

X-35U is made according to the normal aerodynamic scheme and has an X-shaped folding wing with an air intake of a trapezoidal section. After launch, the rocket instantly finds its target and is steadily moving in its direction. It is controlled by an inertial system. The active radar head ARGS-35E and the radio altimeter provide all the necessary information to build the final trajectory. The X-35U also has advanced guidance systems with advanced satellite navigation.

A rocket is extremely difficult to stop, even if it is already detected. Her dual-band active guidance system allows her to bypass all intercept systems, as well as the impact of advanced electronic warfare equipment.

https://rueconomics.ru/354160-novaya-rossiiskaya-raketa-kh-35u-sposobna-prevratit-lyubuyu-platformu-v-opasneishee-mnogofunkcionalnoe-oruzhie

[Avior]

I don’t know if Neptune’s GPS is dual-band or not, but the rest of Neptune has the same differences from the original X-35 that you wrote, it uses GPS instead of Glonass for correction.
I wrote there above

In my opinion, it is more correct to say that both the Kh-35U and Neptune are missiles based on the Soviet X-35, which were not initially produced in their designed form.
both that and another differ from the original X-35 range, guidance system, Neptune-sized in addition.

[Maks1995]

Well, like our patriots, they didn’t laugh at Ukraine, and weapons appear.
ATGM, Tanks, now RCC.
Now they’ll probably write everywhere that the next thing is missing .....

[Sky strike fighter]

Is all this Neptune and Alder-M, or do you mean KR Kite or something else interesting?

[Uncle Vanya Susanin]

“... Ukrainization means: abandoning your past, being ashamed of belonging to the Russian people, even the names“ Rus ”,“ Russian ”, abandoning the traditions of history, carefully wiping off all common Russian peculiarities and trying to fake a regional“ Ukrainian ”identity.

Ukraine is a retreat from the centuries-old, with all the branches of the Russian people and the national genius of a developed language and culture, self-transformation into an intertribal obnosov, to a wipe of either Polish or German boots: idolatry before the region, servility before the Polish-Jewish-German socialists, renunciation of the original principles their people, from historical self-awareness, a departure from church-social traditions.

Ukraine is an ailment that is capable of undermining even the most powerful national organism, and there is no condemnation that would be enough for this voluntary self-destruction! ”
Osip Monchalovsky from the work "The Main Foundations of the Russian Nationality" (1904)

“In order for there to be a“ Ukrainian ”culture, the existence of the Ukrainian people is necessary. But there is no people of that name yet, in the extreme in Galicia there is only the “Ukrainian” variety of the Russian people. ”

[val43]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Of course, it wasn’t planned. As it’s not planned to take Neptune into service, as it’s all for blowing dust, you’ll see how terrible we are, but as tests we didn’t plan to hit the barge, on another test a jamb so that Neptune didn’t fly there They explained that it was planned, and most importantly, those who really know the state of affairs on this project are well aware that this is a fake, therefore they do not plan to buy, since there is nothing to buy.

The Minister of Defense of Ukraine said ...

[Ros 56]

Is not all Soviet ruined these savages Bandera? Surprising for these sailors.

[Sky strike fighter]

A set of production and design documentation for the X-35, back in the years of the USSR, was transferred to the Kharkov Aviation Plant.

[Avior]

Neptune differs from the Soviet X-35 in size and guidance system, so this was obviously not done according to the old set of documentation.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Avior

Neptune differs from the Soviet X-35 in size and guidance system, so this was obviously not done according to the old set of documentation.

Take a close look at the table; it indicates that the Kh-35U (2015) can hit ground targets, which was demonstrated in Syria. Launches were carried out from the Su-34.

[Avior]

I looked long ago.
but you don’t quite understand.
The control system allows you to hit ground targets at all of the missiles, including Neptune and X-35U, except for the X-35. I have not argued the opposite anywhere.
The control system of all but the X-35 uses correction using satellite navigation.
I brought a plate to show the size of the missiles, so that it was clear that the design documentation from the X-35 cannot be used for the production of Neptune - they are different in size.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Avior

I looked long ago.
but you don’t quite understand.
The control system allows you to hit ground targets at all of the missiles, including Neptune and X-35U, except for the X-35. I have not argued the opposite anywhere.
The control system of all but the X-35 uses correction using satellite navigation.
I brought a plate to show the size of the missiles, so that it was clear that the design documentation from the X-35 cannot be used for the production of Neptune - they are different in size.

I thought that you meant that the X-35U, unlike Neptune, could not work on ground targets, and it turns out that you had in mind the earlier X-35. I don’t understand you.

[Ros 56]

It stuck you all, he is your hero, and not mine, so I repeat for the gifted: don’t crap any food and go to your Bandera sites, you shouldn’t do it here. They turned the country into a garbage dump and something else croak earhooks. Donbass will still say nothing.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Southern

you got stuck with the "Bandera", zeroed in the zeroed "country"?

You were mistaken, he is not from Ukraine to be

zeroed in the zeroed "country"

[Sky strike fighter]

Let's say that maybe you will be able to finish the analogue of our X-35U.

[Sky strike fighter]

Like in FIG, that's all.

[Maas]

The speed of the rocket in the region of 1000 km / h?

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Maas

The speed of the rocket in the region of 1000 km / h?

A flight speed of up to 0,85 M - this is about 1000 km / h

[Old26]

Quote: voyaka uh

If the rocket turned out normal, then it can be exported.

And if they, Alexey, can sell it to someone, then there will be a howl at VO: "Why did these ave. Idurks from A (B. C, D - name any country) bought this g ... but" Neptune ", and not our "Onyx." And they will scratch their turnips, but why did Ukraine create such a rocket - they are clumsy and only do what they saw the budget

Quote: Termit1309

Quote: voyaka uh

If the rocket turned out normal, then it can be exported.

If any country is interested and gives money for revision and mass production, then maybe.

That's quite possible. Saudi Arabia and the countries of the Persian Gulf can order such a missile from Ukraine, especially if we consider that its cost will probably be lower than the market value of the Harpoon, which has a market value of $ 1,5 million.

[Sky strike fighter]

Well, you compared the supersonic Onyx, which in its latest modification Onyx-M flies 800 km and the subsonic analog of our X-35U subsonic Neptune rocket.

Saudi Arabia and the countries of the Persian Gulf can order such a missile from Ukraine, especially if one considers that its cost will probably be lower than the market value of the Harpoon, which has a market value of $ 1,5 million.

With these purchases, the Gulf countries pay for loyalty to their western patron. No one will let Ukraine into this market. It is not a matter of money; the market is divided there.

[Oleg Shulga]

Were they allowed to use anti-tank systems, from the “ray” design bureau?
For 2 years, Jordan bought several hundred missiles and bought a license to assemble the Corsair.
The Saudis have bought more than 200 anti-tank systems Skif and Corsair and about 2 thousand missiles for them for 150 million Basques and are going to buy as many
Qatar bought about one and a half hundred guidance systems for Turkish modules under Skif and missiles for them
And there are still purchases of Algeria, Azerbaijan, the OAU ...

[Old26]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Well, you compared the supersonic Onyx, which in its latest modification Onyx-M flies 800 km and the subsonic analog of our X-35U subsonic Neptune rocket.

Saudi Arabia and the countries of the Persian Gulf can order such a missile from Ukraine, especially if one considers that its cost will probably be lower than the market value of the Harpoon, which has a market value of $ 1,5 million.

With these purchases, the Gulf countries pay for loyalty to their western patron. No one will let Ukraine into this market. It is not a matter of money; the market is divided there.

I am comparing what is. Whether or not we sell the same "Onyx" to country X will be decided by scratching the left heel behind the ear. And without any logic. A striking example is Azerbaijan. Selling a lot of different weapons, they suddenly refused to buy half of the Bal complex. The result - the Azerbaijanis bought the Israeli "Gabriel". It's the same with other countries. The Saudis will want to buy the same "Onyx", and we will migrate, as with Azerbaijan, while Ukraine hurries up - they will buy from Ukraine. especially if they fulfill an order for Thunder 2 for the Saudis. Plus they will offer a lower price. And the main thing for them will be the quantity. They have an enemy coast 200 km away. And if they have to choose between an expensive supersonic missile and a cheap subsonic missile, then at this distance they will buy a cheap one. For they will buy more. And the rocket will fly to the target for 4 minutes or 10 minutes - it does not really matter. In addition, the goals of the same opponents of Saudi Arabia often have such goals that the expensive Onyx is redundant. It is cheaper to sink a boat or corvette with Neptune / Harpoon / Uranus than using Onyx.
And about loyalty. Nevertheless, they buy our weapons and order Ukrainian, despite the fact that they are loyal to the Americans.

The last modification of "Onyx-M" is not yet available and it is not known when it will be. So it is better not to remember him, like "Caliber-M" now. They will put it into service, put it into production, and then we will talk. While this is a virtual weapon system, similar to the "Zircon", "Petrel", "Poseidon" and other "wunderwaffe".

[Sky strike fighter]

The last modification of "Onyx-M" is not yet available and it is not known when it will be.

Well, how is it not? The tests of Onyx-M and Zircon are on. The strange logic about the tested Neptune can be said that it is, but the tested Onyx-M and Zircon seem to be gone.

MOSCOW, September 25. / TASS /. The sea-based cruise missile "Onyx-M" with a firing range increased to 800 km has passed throw tests; before being put into service, it is necessary to carry out flight tests for the declared range.

the range has been increased due to the new composition of the fuel, as well as the lighter and more compact onboard radio electronics of the rocket. All standard carriers of the previous version of the "Onyx" will be able to fire the new missile as well, since its dimensions have not changed.

Earlier on Wednesday, a TASS source in the military-industrial complex said that NPO Mashinostroyenia had developed a sea-based cruise missile "Onyx-M" with an increased firing range and increased accuracy of hitting sea and ground targets. "On the basis of the Onyx cruise missile in service, a new version, Onyx-M, has been developed, with a maximum range of 800 km," the agency's source said.

https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/6925991

[Old26]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Well, how is it not? The tests of Onyx-M and Zircon are on. The strange logic about the tested Neptune can be said that it is, but the tested Onyx-M and Zircon seem to be gone.

I will repeat myself once more if you do not understand. All three - "Onyx-M", "Zircon" and "Neptune" are being tested. Moreover, the status of the same Onyx-M is still not clear. Either development is underway, or testing has begun. About "Caliber-M" is even more muffled. It is only known that "Zircon" is being tested. And "Neptune" is being tested by our neighbors.
So, prospective buyers in the Persian Gulf are unlikely to buy the same Onyx and Onyx-M. But a missile class "Harpoon" / "Uranus" / "Neptune" - easily.

[Sky strike fighter]

So, prospective buyers in the Persian Gulf are unlikely to buy the same Onyx and Onyx-M. But a missile class "Harpoon" / "Uranus" / "Neptune" - easily.

So I don’t argue with that. They don’t have to confront AUG. Yes, we are not making these missiles for sale, but for ourselves. Otherwise, buyers will give rockets to amers, it will be interesting. They are loyal to them. For sale Bramos is.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Otherwise, buyers will give rockets to amers, that will be interesting. They are loyal to them.

India didn’t quarrel with the USA either; Caliber family missiles were delivered to India (both SLCM 3M-14E and RCC 3M-54E)

[slipped]

Quote: Old26

So, prospective buyers in the Persian Gulf are unlikely to buy the same Onyx and Onyx-M.

"Prospective Buyers" will buy Yakhont, or Brahmos at least. Onyx is not for sale.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Yes, the missile turned out to be in Ukraine, our fleet should pay more attention to the missile defense of ships.

[Old26]

Quote: slipped

Quote: Old26

So, prospective buyers in the Persian Gulf are unlikely to buy the same Onyx and Onyx-M.

"Prospective Buyers" will buy Yakhont, or Brahmos at least. Onyx is not for sale.

Ueli. Of course, the export version of Onyx is Yakhont. Yes, and "Yakhont" with "Brahmos" is absolutely unnecessary there. Expensive and at the same time redundant for this region