Frames presented attempting to bring down an American transport aircraft C-130 Hercules

69

A video was published on the network that demonstrates an attempt to attack a military transporter from the ground. This is a U.S. Air Force C-130 Hercules aircraft. According to recent reports, an attack on the transport side was carried out in Afghanistan.

In the publication, The Drive indicates that the militants attempted to shoot down an American military transport aircraft using a grenade launcher. Moreover, the same publication claims that it is an RPG-7 manual anti-tank grenade launcher. Although experts doubted that a grenade launcher shot was represented on the frames.

Everything that happened was photographed with the help of a video camera the American drone MQ-9 Reaper, which was at that time in the air. The video shows a parachute dropping cargo from the side of an American transporter, which lowered its height to complete this discharge. At this moment, an attack attempt was carried out, carried out from one of the buildings in the area of ​​the military facility, for which the cargo was intended.

Ammunition released passed the aircraft, however, in the immediate vicinity of the cargo dropped from the side. At least visually, you can perceive that way.

The material indicates that in the end, none of the US military was injured. At the same time, the operator of the reconnaissance and strike drone carried out a rocket attack on the very position from which the ammunition was fired.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    69 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +4
      April 8 2020 19: 31
      The Yankees themselves, and staged a provocation against their aircraft. In order not to withdraw from there their military occupiers! A makeshift missile, without a homing head, is a pure inertial, only a standing airplane can be knocked out like that!
      1. +17
        April 8 2020 19: 34
        Quote: Thrifty
        Only a standing airplane can be knocked down like this!

        There are examples of successful shots, for example, Mi-26 in Chechnya ... amers were lucky
        1. +21
          April 8 2020 20: 59
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          Quote: Thrifty
          Only a standing airplane can be knocked down like this!

          There are examples of successful shots, for example, Mi-26 in Chechnya ... amers were lucky

          In Chechnya, they hit a maneuvering helicopter.
          And here, from a distance of about a dozen wingspan of this aircraft did not hit.
          What a big plane.
          They shot at all with a VERY SMALL WARNING - a rocket flies into several corps behind the aircraft.
          Those who fight and survived in Afghanistan cannot be so "green".
          Conclusion - production video
          1. +6
            April 8 2020 21: 06
            Everything can be, but
            Quote: Shurik70
            distances of about a dozen wingspan of this aircraft did not fall. What a big plane.

            So at a vantage point from what distance did they shoot? Maybe the shooter is not very experienced or something. The luck of one is the failure of others
            1. +16
              April 8 2020 21: 18
              S-130 wingspan is about 40 meters. So, they shot somewhere from 400-420 meters.
              The cruising speed of 628 km / h is 175 m / s
              RPG-7 shot speed 112-145 m / s
              That is, the lead had to take about 12 aircraft corps. And the lead in one case was taken.
              Such squinting fighters cannot survive in Afghanistan.
              1. -4
                April 8 2020 21: 20
                Quote: Shurik70
                S-130 wingspan is about 40 meters. So, they shot somewhere from 400-420 meters

                Have you identified this by eye?
                1. +16
                  April 8 2020 21: 24
                  Quote: Liam
                  Quote: Shurik70
                  S-130 wingspan is about 40 meters. So, they shot somewhere from 400-420 meters

                  Have you identified this by eye?

                  The distance from the aircraft to the launch of the rocket is by eye the size of the aircraft.
                  The size of the plane is on Wikipedia.
                  Multiply one digit by another - at school I once learned ...
                  drinks
                  1. -3
                    April 8 2020 21: 38
                    And at school you weren’t taught that the plane and the arrow have different heights above the ground and different distances from the drone, so visually without taking into account these and many other things, it’s better not to determine anything?) And it can turn out like with one famous Boeing -777 and Su- 27 over Donbas, where due to ignorance of these moments the Boeing turned out to be the size of a couple of stadiums) drinks
                    1. +2
                      April 8 2020 21: 54
                      By the way, yes. The airplane is not visible at all in the video, only its shadow is visible (the distance from the shadow to the arrow is about 420 m). But the flight of the rocket is clearly visible.
                      Conclusion - THE ARROW AIMED BELOW THE AIRCRAFT !!!
                      1. -2
                        April 8 2020 22: 35
                        Whoever writes here about "Lucky Airplane" has not the slightest idea about physics or mathematics or about other simple matters that are taught in schools. The probability of hitting a single shot from the ground, by eye, and even from this weapon on a flying plane, taking into account speeds and positions in space below zero. Or 1 in many millions.
                        During the 2nd World War, one plane to get into another burst of several cannons / machine guns with a huge rate of fire and an incomparably higher initial ammunition speed than RPGs had to approach 50/100 meters
                        1. +10
                          April 9 2020 00: 14
                          Quote: Liam
                          Whoever writes here about "The plane was lucky" does not have the slightest idea of ​​either physics or mathematics.

                          Are you sure that you have a level of knowledge to evaluate my level of knowledge and skills? You need to be more modest. For example, specialists in this field taught me theories of shooting at air targets, some with decent experience. Everything was in order with practice too.
                          Lucky, because the Afghans are mostly excellent shooters. If this one shot at an airplane, then practice let us down.
                          You control yourself, sometimes it’s better not to advertise the ability to google everything.
                        2. -8
                          April 9 2020 00: 18
                          I don’t know who taught you what, but the results of studies are lower than the baseboard. Name the video that was lucky — the nonsense plane at the level — I’m lucky that today the meteorite did not fall on my head. In probability, these are events of a comparable order
                        3. +8
                          April 9 2020 00: 21
                          I see that you have not even been taught to communicate in life. Do mercy - go through, read a book, do something useful for yourself
                        4. +1
                          April 9 2020 07: 54
                          Quote: Pete Mitchell
                          Lucky, because the Afghans are mostly excellent shooters.

                          Rather, great tactics, a few shooters and different lead-ins contribute to the hit.
                          And here it doesn’t look like that.
                        5. +4
                          April 9 2020 01: 55
                          The probability of a single shot from the ground, through the peephole, and even from this weapon on a flying plane, taking into account speeds and position in space below zero.

                          Right below?
                        6. +1
                          April 9 2020 18: 50
                          Maybe it would be better like this?
                        7. 0
                          April 9 2020 19: 23
                          Recalled from classic
                  2. +1
                    April 8 2020 22: 54
                    Back in the "school of life" they explain that an RPG shot does not shoot tracers tongue which are perfectly visible on the video ... yeah ...
              2. +3
                April 8 2020 21: 50
                You are strict, but when everyone studies, amers were lucky this time
                Quote: Shurik70
                Such squinting fighters cannot survive in Afghanistan.
              3. +6
                April 8 2020 21: 53
                Quote: Shurik70
                The cruising speed of 628 km / h is 175 m / s
                RPG-7 shot speed 112-145 m / s

                Cruise shipments are not dumped. Rather, the speed of the aircraft is worth it. And the drop height is unknown, and this greatly reduces the chances of getting in, due to the reduction of the grenade at a distance. Plus the speed of the grenade is variable in distance. From LNG-9 there would be more chances to get there.
                1. +10
                  April 8 2020 22: 19
                  In any case, it’s a pity that they didn’t hit ..... am
              4. +1
                April 9 2020 10: 34
                Quote: Shurik70
                The cruising speed of 628 km / h is 175 m /

                Who is dropping the cargo, close to the ground, even at cruising speed? The speed was minimal, a little more than takeoff speed, 300-350 km / h. In addition, the video clearly shows that they fired without any pre-emption at all. when firing from a grenade launcher, they make a mandatory amendment even for the wind, but here it is stupid to "finger to the sky." You can treat the Afghan mujahideen as you like, but they are experienced fighters. And yet, what and to whom did the Americans throw off there? Obviously, they won't tell us.
        2. +2
          April 8 2020 23: 53
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          e.g. Mi-26 in Chechnya

          They were shot down by MANPADS. Bought in Georgia.
          1. +3
            April 9 2020 00: 18
            If I’m not mistaken, one -26 was shot down after taking off precisely from the RPG: the largest losses at a time
            1. +6
              April 9 2020 00: 38
              Confuse, I apologize for the mistake, they shot down -8ku from the RPG during the first war.
            2. +2
              April 9 2020 07: 51
              Quote: Pete Mitchell
              biggest losses at a time

              MANPADS, And losses due to the minefield, which forced to land
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +5
          April 9 2020 02: 51
          Pete mitchell
          Hello.
          Sorry, that Mi 26 was not shot down from a grenade launcher. There exactly MANPADS.
          There was one episode in Dagestan - 1999 - PTRK - but the helicopter either managed to land, or it was taken off at an approach landing at minimum speed.
          The Czechs made a video. There, one of the senior officers died. This is when Karamahi. Botlikh, Tsumadinsky district ...... I don’t remember the details anymore.
          There were rumors about the shot down with the help of RPGs in the First War, but I’m not sure that it’s true - there were such rumors that .... :)))))
          1. +7
            April 9 2020 02: 58
            Good morning, I apologize for the embarrassment - 26 was shot down by MANPADS. In '94 -96 two -8s were shot down from RPGs. I have classmates who transferred to helicopters there from the first day.
            Once again - not from evil, a mistake crept in. Good day
            1. +5
              April 9 2020 03: 26
              Pete mitchell
              Apologies are not accepted, since you have no reason to apologize.
              Absolutely.
              And there was no embarrassment. I did not notice. anyway.
              And on the topic, I clearly know less than you, because I walked the earth. And it’s hard to even suspect me of involvement in aviators or air defense experts :))))
              Inaccuracies, errors happen to everyone. And I also have them more often than I would like. So nothing bad happened.
              And, damn it. I could not even imagine that you wrote anything from evil ... with a fig, the bathhouse burned down .... :)))))
              Pancake. I even became uncomfortable. that I blurted out, and you apologize .... I repeat - there is no need to apologize to you.
              Okay. bye.
              By the way - judging by the desire - you have - morning ... and I have - 2.24 nights - I'm in Kaliningrad. So. what - hello - to the Far East from the westernmost point of the Russian Federation. :))))
              1. +5
                April 9 2020 10: 23
                Good morning, late yesterday, quarantined all rhythms clean, so I was surprised to see your comment so late - hello to Kaliningrad.
                Most Afghans are good shooters: if this one shot at an airplane, then he has not learned yet.
                Champions on any Americans - they managed to bring down a flying UAB helicopter ..
        5. 0
          April 9 2020 03: 40
          What lucky there. You carefully look at the frames. The missile goes straight forward, without any control. Dolbanuli some unguided projectile. No control is visible. And in general, judging by the torch, some kind of homemade work.
      2. -1
        April 8 2020 19: 36
        Quote: Thrifty
        Homemade missile without homing head

        Moreover, the same publication claims that it is an RPG-7 manual anti-tank grenade launcher
      3. +3
        April 8 2020 20: 32
        The Yankees themselves, and staged a provocation against their aircraft. In order not to withdraw from there their military occupiers! A makeshift missile, without a homing head, is a pure inertial, only a standing airplane can be knocked out like that!

        Far from being a fact. They fired into the plane with what was at hand. As in the song by A. Apina - "I slapped into it from what was." Yes, they quickly faded away. Their usual tactics.
        1. 0
          April 8 2020 20: 40
          Quote: Rich
          Yes, quickly faded

          Judging by the video, they did not manage to fade
        2. +1
          April 9 2020 09: 39
          Read a little about how the Americans guard their bases and airfields. They know how to fight badly, but to hide ... "Accidentally" to be in the range of infantry weapons of American planes taking off is fantastic. This is possible only with a well-prepared, planned, carried out by experienced warriors operation. And in such conditions to sculpt "from what was" with just anyone's hands? Hehe ... This is a provocation.
      4. Maz
        +1
        April 8 2020 21: 26
        Fake. minimum height of cargo discharge so that the parachute opens, plus the speed of the aircraft about 400 km per hour, a shot without any lead. Some kind of nonsense crazy, designed for an untrained audience
        1. 0
          April 10 2020 16: 32
          It looks like some kind of computer toy. At what height was the drone to consider the S-130 barge to look so tiny, while a shot from a grenade launcher looks like launching a large anti-aircraft missile. The intermittent torch of the shot is also embarrassing, as rockets often look in toys.
          I do not presume to assert anything, but doubts about the veracity are very big.
      5. 0
        April 8 2020 21: 29
        I missed a bit, about 400 meters, the Taliban skipped fire training
      6. +3
        April 8 2020 22: 56
        Quote: Thrifty
        Homemade missile, without homing, pure inertial

        what inertial ?! The RPG grenade generally has no guidance equipment, it flies along a ballistic trajectory. hi
      7. +1
        April 9 2020 10: 13
        Sounds like an American drone ad.
    2. +6
      April 8 2020 19: 31
      One word - lucky
      1. -2
        April 8 2020 21: 08
        Come on. At what height did the airplane drop the parachute load and what was the height of the grenade?
        1. +3
          April 8 2020 21: 52
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          One word - lucky
    3. +3
      April 8 2020 19: 34
      Our lard and yes to us in the wort. Well done Americans. Soon there will not be a dozen countries on the planet that would not hate you.
      1. +6
        April 8 2020 20: 00
        Ummm ... what does this video have to do with us? You seem to have beguiled the coast? And what is it we are to blame for being hated? Is it that we have 100 times less deaths from coronavirus? Or the fact that we manage to help instead of "requisitioning" planes with medical supplies and bandages from our allies? You are saying something wrong.
    4. +5
      April 8 2020 19: 35
      If there was "Needle" and a competent shooter, he could have shot down. That would be a scandal))
      1. +4
        April 8 2020 20: 36
        On the needle, as far as I remember, the heat head and getting to this slowly flying target is not particularly problematic
        1. +2
          April 9 2020 03: 51
          Hit - yes, knock down is not particularly likely. MANPADS have a small charge, and this is a large eraplan, with a minimum of electronics and with four motors. Damaged, but will fly further likely.
    5. +6
      April 8 2020 19: 35
      Ammunition released passed the aircraft, however, in the immediate vicinity of the cargo dropped from the side

      Yes, it looks like they shot at the load. It can be seen that the shot was fired after the board passed the line of fire
    6. +1
      April 8 2020 19: 57
      Some RPG flew far .... I doubt it, and the Americans did everything right.
      1. +7
        April 8 2020 21: 15
        Quote: 75Sergey
        Some RPG flew far .... I doubt it, and the Americans did everything right.

        They would have done right if they had dumped from all their bases in their America and allowed the world to live and develop peacefully in accordance with its own rules, laws and traditions.
        1. -1
          April 9 2020 00: 56
          Those. will let everything drift?
    7. 0
      April 8 2020 20: 21
      "Come out one on one, we will not beat you on takeoff - Maestro" With RPG-7, Hercules can only be beaten during takeoff and landing, the rest is a PR super duper Hercules. Like Soviet missiles don't take it. The question is. Why did Tram put his signature on the agreement with the Taliban? So that his pepelatsy tried to soak with the RPG-7?
      I tell you. We do not need to choose their prezik. We need to choose their congress
      1. 0
        April 8 2020 20: 47
        Quote: Tusv
        I tell you. We do not need to choose their prezik. We need to choose their congress

        And to the annihilation!
        1. 0
          April 8 2020 21: 05
          Quote: Tol100v
          Quote: Tusv
          I tell you. We do not need to choose their prezik. We need to choose their congress

          And to the annihilation!

          It was the N-th day of self-isolation. In the morning, people went to the refrigerator, took out potions and inoculated all day. By evening, he was completely neglected!
          No offense! Himself so! wink

          Inoculation - (lat. Inoculatio vaccination)

          1) the introduction of pathogens of infectious diseases or vaccines in human or animal tissue;

          2) in parasitology - the introduction of insects and ticks of pathogens into the blood of humans or animals during bloodsucking.
      2. +2
        April 8 2020 21: 23
        Quote: Tusv
        The question is. What for did Tram sign his agreement with the Taliban? So that his pepelats tried to wet with RPG-7?

        There is also the ISIS riffraff, who understands that with the release of the mattresses the Taliban will deal with them closely, and therefore have a great interest in disrupting the agreements. The officials of the "Kabulis" also have the same interest, who also understand that the Taliban will not be alarmed with them and will wrest power in Kabul as soon as the last American plane disappears over the horizon. So there are those who need this provocation in order to shift the responsibility onto the Taliban.
    8. +5
      April 8 2020 21: 21
      Although a missile flight is similar to an RPG-7 charge flight, the launch itself is not the same! In RPG-7, the main flare is not forward, but backward and looks as if with a gap into two parts.
    9. Cat
      +3
      April 8 2020 22: 40
      I have the impression that they didn’t shoot at all at the plane, but at the load or another target.
    10. +1
      April 8 2020 23: 32
      If you look carefully, the firing is not on the plane, but on the dropped cargo. And I must say the shot passes a few meters. Which is good enough for a shooter. There were no goals to hit the plane.
    11. +3
      April 8 2020 23: 49
      Frames presented attempting to bring down an American transport aircraft C-130 Hercules
      ==================
      LIES!!! (as with "911"
      If we understand women, then I represent the opinion of OUR ...
    12. +2
      April 9 2020 01: 10
      A small endured made arrows. Or didn’t want to shoot down at all. bully
      1. +1
        April 9 2020 01: 45
        Or shot at a load, and the plane was too high for the grenade launcher
    13. 0
      April 9 2020 07: 12
      After the Mujahideen refused to return the Stingers allocated once by the US government, it looks really strange. Americans gave 80 thousand bucks for each MANPADS.
    14. +2
      April 9 2020 09: 24
      It is necessary to take anticipation, it is completely absent in the video. It is quite possible to hit such a "cow", there were precedents.
    15. +2
      April 9 2020 10: 48
      It’s a pity that they missed
    16. 0
      April 9 2020 23: 45
      I would definitely not regret it.
    17. 0
      April 10 2020 11: 08
      It's time for mattresses to master the "Afghan" takeoff and landing.
    18. 0
      April 22 2020 14: 31
      They shot at the cargo ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"